should I leave emet keep my (DEP) on still?

Should I allow emits 3.0V keep my DEP on or should I just leave it on Opt, in? I basically installed it mainly to protect ie #9 and indeed all programs in my C: / / files-i always practice of computer security I don, t click on anything that tells me unless I know what it is - and my Email, I always scan before opening attachments, even if its someone I know I , he's their first, but ask that emits Can I just leave it on how it was installed Just to Protect all my c:\\ files and ie #9 I really Don, t have much else on my PC i Don, t play games online - i.m just a pc ordinary browser and I like watch Watch and go on facebook - in any case can someone Tell me on Emet on the issue that ' thank you...

Hello michael barbrie,.

There is a newer version of 3.5 EMET. which is available for download from Microsoft.

In this version:
1 without requiring source code: until now, several no work around available (for example Data Execution Prevention) are required for any request to be chosen manually in and recompiled. EMET changes this by allowing a user to opt in applications without recompilation. This is especially convenient for deployment of mitigation measures on the software that was written before the mitigation measures are available and when the source code is not available.

Click on here to download the new version of 3.5 EMET.
I hope this helps answer your question.

Marilyn

Tags: Windows

Similar Questions

  • I use my MacBook Air as a desktop computer. Should I leave the charger plugged all the time or should I drain the battery and then recharge? What is the best for the battery?

    I use my MacBook Air as a desktop computer. Should I leave the charger plugged all the time or should I drain the battery and then recharge? What is the best for the battery?

    Keep the computer plugged in whenever possible.

    If you keep the computer always connected, make sure that at least twice a month

    Run it on battery until battery charge level falls to about 40-50%.

    Please don't completely discharge the battery. Discharge the battery completely will reduce wear and tear on the battery.

    For more information:

    Section: To optimize the battery life

    http://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT204054

    Citing at the bottom of the linked article.

    "The question is often asked:" should I disconnect my laptop from the mains when not in service? Under normal circumstances it should not be necessary because as soon as the lithium-ion battery is full, a properly functioning charger will stop the load and load the pad will only engage when the battery voltage drops to a low level. Most of the users do not remove AC power, and this practice is safe. »

    http://BatteryUniversity.com/learn/article/bu_808c_what_the_user_can_do

  • Will not wear my watch for a week... should I leave it on the charger for a week or take off for the week?

    Will not wear out my watch for a week... should I leave all week on the charger or leave it?

    Hello

    You can leave it on the charger if you wish.

    https://help.Apple.com/watch/#/apd2b717523a

  • Should I leave my new mini die 4 Pad completely before you recharge it fully?

    Should I leave my brand new mini die 4 iPad completely before recharging? I've heard that it can increase the autonomy in the long term?

    You too, its called a full life cycle when it has low battery and charge you 100%, this will increase your battery if your having battery problems

  • What should I change to keep alive indefinitely without any Windows activity?

    Title of the Moose: kb2492386

    Installed kb2492386 update to XP Pro (version 2002) as well as several IE8, several .NET framework and central management framework.  Since the updates windows times out and require a re-login.  Power options are unchanged: never stop disks, never attend the eve and disabled hibernation.

    What should I change to keep alive indefinitely without any Windows activity?

    Hello

    Follow these steps and check if that helps:

    a. log on to a user administrator account in Windows XP.

    b. click the rectangular 'Start' button in the left corner and open the control panel.

    c. click on "Performance and Maintenance" and select "Power Options".

    d. choose 'Never' lists 'sleep' and 'Putting into hibernation'. Then click on 'OK '.

    Also, see this Microsoft KB article and check if that helps:

    How to solve the problems of hibernation and standby in Windows XP

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/907477

  • After a system restore to a time before Windows XP, should I leave Safe Mode and restart normally? What other steps should I take in Mode safe?

    After a system restore to a time before Windows XP, should I leave Safe Mode and restart normally.  Completely restored restore operation the registry both before the intrusion of viruses if the date and time specified as the restore point is earlier than the time of the intrusion, but in the same 'on' the cycle of computer?  I have to do something else before going back to safe mode?

    Time as about 23:00 last night 7/29 restoration, first known intrusion by "XP Home Security 2012" was shortly after midnight 7/30.

    I ended up a sde.exe process, which stopped the pop-ups.  A full scan with Norton quarantine, JS. SecurityTool.  After a restart of the computer, the normal features of the programs has been lost by the "Run" menu or icons on the desktop.  By clicking on the icon for the normal .exe files redirected to the dialog box "select a program to open.

    I restarted in Mode safe mode with networking and then restore.  I tried opening IE and Excel and that they work properly in Mode without failure.  They will work correctly when I leave Safe Mode and restart normally.  Should I test other specific applications.

    XP Home Security 2012 seems to have accessed or modified some files to DropBox (not sure how this program was installed, but it was already on).

    Should I delete all DropBox files, just those showing a modification date corresponding to the intrusion of XP Home Security 2012, or don't you worry about this?

    After a system restore to a time before Windows XP, should I leave Safe Mode and restart normally.  Completely restored restore operation the registry both before the intrusion of viruses if the date and time specified as the restore point is earlier than the time of the intrusion, but in the same 'on' the cycle of computer?  I have to do something else before going back to safe mode?

    Time as about 23:00 last night 7/29 restoration, first known intrusion by "XP Home Security 2012" was shortly after midnight 7/30.

    I ended up a sde.exe process, which stopped the pop-ups.  A full scan with Norton quarantine, JS. SecurityTool.  After a restart of the computer, the normal features of the programs has been lost by the "Run" menu or icons on the desktop.  By clicking on the icon for the normal .exe files redirected to the dialog box "select a program to open.

    I restarted in Mode safe mode with networking and then restore.  I tried opening IE and Excel and that they work properly in Mode without failure.  They will work correctly when I leave Safe Mode and restart normally.  Should I test other specific applications.

    XP Home Security 2012 seems to have accessed or modified some files to DropBox (not sure how this program was installed, but it was already on).

    Should I delete all DropBox files, just those showing a modification date corresponding to the intrusion of XP Home Security 2012, or don't you worry about this?

    System Restore IS NOT the way to remove malware. The reason why you do not see the effects of the malware in safe mode is probably due to the fact that the process for most malware does not load in safe mode, and therefore not active.

    Restart the computer in Safe Mode with network. Click HERE. Download Malwarebytes. Update Malwarebytes and perform a full scan.  Choose to quarantine found nothing. Once completed click HERE and download Superantispyware Portable. Run a full scan quarantined found anything yet. Restart your computer in normal mode and perform a quick scan with Malwarebytes.

  • My 'C' drive is full of 98%. What should I do to keep my computer running out of space?

    My 'C' drive is full of 98%. What should I do to keep my computer running out of space?

    You can visit your C: drive and straight copy / paste your images and data that keep a lot of spaces in an external hard drive.

    If you want to save, then take a look at:

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/308422

  • I am a new user of CC. Very satisfied.  I have just d/l upgrades on 2014 CC.  now, I have 2 sets of folders.  Can I uninstall the old version. or should I leave on this machine?

    I am a new user of CC. Very satisfied.  I have just d/l upgrades on 2014 CC.  now, I have 2 sets of folders.  Can I uninstall the old version. or should I leave on this machine?

    2014 CC uses NEW plugins https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1499663

    -so do uninstall is not the old programs CC if you use plugins in your programs

    If you are sure you don't need the old CC programs

    -http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/install-apps.html to install or uninstall

  • HUP of licensing; I am looking to buy a HUP to my house through my employer. If I get fired or leave the company, is my license still valid?

    I am looking to buy a HUP to my house through my employer.  If I get fired or leave the company, is my license still valid?

    From the following link.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/FAQ.aspx#faq_3

    «.. . and tell them when they should stop using the software program home use, for example if the end of your Software Assurance coverage or an employee leaves employment. »

    You must stop using the software if you leave at the service of your company.

  • When I open a PDF file, I get the following message "invalid plugin detected Adobe Acrobat reader DC will leave" I reinstalled Adobe DC but still the same problem, it happens with all PDFs. Any advice much appreciated.

    When I open a PDF file, I get the following message "invalid plugin detected Adobe Acrobat reader DC will leave" I reinstalled Adobe DC but still the same problem, it happens with all PDFs. Any advice much appreciated.

    Hi Stephen39,

    Do you have any 3rd party plugin installed for Adobe Reader? If not, close all instances of Adobe Reader running and delete the entire folder to: C:\program Adobe [version] \Reader\plug_ins.

    Now go to control panel > programs and features. Locate the entry for Adobe Reader X and choose to repair the installation.

    If you do not have a 3rd party plugin installed, try to uninstall them and see if the problem is related to the same. If it works, let me know what plugins have been the origin of the problem so that I can have a look.

    If all goes well, this should fix things.

    Thank you

    Nicos

  • I have just the creative application of cloud on my mac than its opening upward and said 'impossible to arrive on the Adobe servers. Please check your firewall settings and try again in a few minutes. I keep trying and it still happens?

    I have just the creative application of cloud on my mac than its opening upward and said 'impossible to arrive on the Adobe servers. Please check your firewall settings and try again in a few minutes. I keep trying and it still happens?

    Hello

    Please make sure that there is no Proxy setting on your network and also check that you are logged into admin and not as mobile admin. You can also try to connect the MAC to a Wi - Fi network to different/open or Mobile Hotspot and disable all antivirus on MAC titles and try to check if the creative cloud app works.

    Thank you.

  • Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

    Hello!

    Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

    And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

    Thank you!

    Anna

    Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

    And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

    Planning your Partitions

    The Question

    Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
    each of them for, and what size should each one be?

    It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
    only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
    the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
    person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
    response).

    Terminology

    First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
    partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
    the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
    "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
    That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
    partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
    He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
    have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
    Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
    partition, not that it's the partition at all.

    A bit of history

    Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
    95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
    using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
    FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
    maximum 2 GB partition size.

    More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
    one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
    space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
    Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
    more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
    bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
    partition of 1 GB or more.

    More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
    That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
    only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
    greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
    about half of his last group waste.

    If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
    FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
    lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
    back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
    1996 - around $ 32.

    So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
    three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
    smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
    so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
    less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
    a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

    People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
    FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

    The present

    Three things have changed radically since 1996:

    1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
    partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
    with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

    2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
    size.

    3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
    can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
    Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

    What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
    multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
    The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
    that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
    should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
    has examined when planning your partition structure.

    What Partitions are used for today

    There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
    scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
    debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
    partition types in the following:

    1. a partition for Windows only

    Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
    If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
    He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
    because both are safe on other partitions.

    The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
    is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
    below to find out why.

    Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
    partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
    small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
    upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
    partition is too small.

    2. a partition for installed programs

    This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
    just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
    installed application programs are safe if they are in another
    partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
    (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
    Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
    buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
    the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
    the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
    work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
    Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

    3. a partition for the pagefile.

    Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
    score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
    help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
    to get back to the page to another file frequently used
    data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
    be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
    almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
    Windows is on C:.

    4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

    Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
    or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
    themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
    because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
    and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
    types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
    strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
    secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
    computer.

    5. a partition for data files

    Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
    I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
    He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
    must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
    I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
    data are safe there and so do not take measures to
    Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
    Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
    probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
    category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
    sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
    the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
    just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
    diet, not how partition you.

    However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
    programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
    two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
    partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
    plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
    or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
    usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
    to save just the score easily, without having to
    collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
    those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
    usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
    its own.

    Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
    very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
    Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
    me, but there are clearly two views different here.

    6. a partition to image files

    Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
    other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
    the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
    the advantage in doing so.

    7. a partition for music files.

    The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
    files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
    just like the other data.

    8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

    For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
    XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
    system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
    discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
    all these partitions

    Performance

    Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
    somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
    probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
    whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
    performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
    so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
    read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
    are, faster access to them will be.

    Organization

    I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
    organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
    to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

    Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
    technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
    files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
    fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
    as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
    a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

    Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
    versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
    possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
    solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
    any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
    with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
    first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
    to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
    the first place.

    What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
    records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
    This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
    When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
    on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
    Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
    less organization rather than more.

    So how should I partition my drive

    If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
    surprise:

    1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
    single (usually c partition :));

    2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
    application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
    (normally D :).)

    With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
    any advantage to have more than two partitions.

  • How low should I leave the battery on my MacBook Pro before I recharge

    I have a new MacBook Pro and I know that once a month I'm supposed to leave the battery discharged.  But how low should it let?

    Don't let the battery discharge to 0. You must load whenever it is convenient. There is no battery memory as the old batteries so you can load any level of discharge.

  • Should I leave the facial recognition Apple learn ears?

    I would have thought it a silly question until I started to take corrective measures that I will not be able to cancel. Now, I want to just make sure that the ear is actually a problem I need to fix and not a useful thing, I'd appreciate it.

    As long as I've been on the Photos (~ April 2015), he found ears and offered me the faces. I read once you include the back of someone's head in their face album. The article implied that users (maybe just lay ones) should not worry face obscured the person or case-head of screwing with the algorithm of recognition. This is a piece of information.

    The second is that maybe Apple learns ears to identify the profile pictures. Maybe he learned a person's appearance according to its features of the face (front) AND its characteristics of the ear (profile). In this case, I very well should put all the pictures where my ear is surrounded exclusively in my face album.

    Or maybe it's intend to Apple (although I can't find anything to support), but the software needs much development (as with African-American faces). In this case, I wouldn't tell him to ignore the ears that I see that it is found; I had just leave them be until the software is pretty good to start with profit by associating them with names.

    I've been on the Beta of El Capitan since my guest between July and September.

    The corrective action, I mentioned include an album of the ears and then, after catching a lot during some time, select them all and choose "don't not a face.

    .

    Face recognition identifies quite a few areas of a photo as a face, if she sees a model, where the two dark spots could be seen as eyes.  I see a lot of these false positives.  Faces in the rock or in the bark of the tree.  Just dismiss it as 'Not a face' as you did.  If you enlarge your photos of the ear, you will see the faces hidden in the section.

    It detects even the faces of pets as sides occasionally:

  • Desktop HP Envy: should I leave computer 24/7?

    Can I leave my computer on 24/7 instead of turn off every night?  I mode "Eve" and the power PC and monitor down automatically after 30 minutes, and only I have to click with the mouse to bring back to life when I want to use it.  It seems that if I turn it off completely and then turn it back on every time, it takes time and would be hard on the computer.  On and off, on and off, on and off, does not seem a good idea for me.

    @TuyHoa6869

    Comment

    Windows 10 provides automatic updates of your operating system - some updates, in fact, many Windows updates - require that at least the computer be restarted.

    In general, assuming that the operating system is healthy, your hardware works as expected, your drivers are up to date and functional, and you run decent security software, with stop on the system is a safe way to manage the computer.

    Leaving the computer 'on' all the time can possibly slow performance, too.

    When the computer is 'off', it is less likely to suffer damage from power spikes, it is less susceptable to the intrusions of various kinds (viruses, hackers) and the material can last even longer.

    Exclusions from this general statement include enterprise systems (example: servers of data) that are built to be run 24/7 in a controlled environment.

    You can certainly leave on the computer - in so many things that you should always restart from time to time to allow updates, drivers and programs to install.

    Leaving the computer 'on' is a personal choice.

    When you see a post that will help you,

    Who inspires you, gives a cool idea,

    Or you learn something new.

    Click the 'Thumbs Up' on this post.

    My answer-click accept as Solution to help others find answers.

Maybe you are looking for