Site at tunnel breaks on upgrading to 8.3.2

Similar Questions

• SBS 2008 office1 Serv2008 Office 2 need to share assets between them via a site to site VPN tunnel

  Hi all.

  I really need help on this one.

  The office 1 installer running SBS2008 Office 2 running Server 2008.

  Each firm has its own FQDN Office 1 CompanyABC 2 A_B_C of the company office.

  Each firm has its own internal IP address pool Office 1 192.168.69.xxx and office 192.168.20.xxx 2.

  Site to site VPN tunnel between 2 office routers Netgear SRX5308 1 and 2 Netgear FVS318G Office established and working.

  Each firm has its own DNS server and acts as a domain controller

  How to configure the 2 networks to see each other and be able to use assets on every network (files, printers)?

  Is it so simple that the addition of another pool internal IP for each DNS server?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  "Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials online help"

  https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/home-client.aspx

  TechNet Server forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• SA520w routing through site-to-site VPN tunnels

  I have several offices that are connected using site-to-site VPN tunnels and all will use the SA520W (firmware 2.1.18). I currently have 3 routers in place, router tunnels created for the router B and c of router. I need assistance with the configuration to allow the guests to router site B get to the router site C. I have attempted to add a static route, but get a destination unreachable host trying to ping. Also, if I connect to the router site has via the Cisco VPN client, I'm not able to get resources on each site, B, or C.

  A - the site 10.10.0.0/24

  Site B - 10.0.0.0/24

  Site of the C - 10.25.0.0/24

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  So, that's what you have configured correctly?

  RTR_A

  ||

  _____________ || ___________

  ||                                            ||

  RTR_B                                RTR_C

  Since there is no tunnel between B and C there is no way for us past that traffic through RTR_A for two reasons. The most important reason is that subnet 10.25.0.0/24 (rtr_c) is not allowed to pass through the IPSec tunnel (it's okay to IPSec?) of rtr_a ==> rtr_b. You can't just add a statement of road because your addresses are not routable which is the reason why it fails.

  Your only option is to create another tunnel between rtr_b and rtr_c. This may not be the ONLY option, but you should get what you need.

  I hope this helps.

• Using the same set processing on several site to site VPN tunnels

  Hi all. I have a rather strange situation about site-to-site VPN tunnel.

  On the one hand, I have a PIX 501 and on the other end an ASA5505 and a tunnel set up between them.

  The problem is that on the side of the PIX, I can't establish a tunnel, but when the traffic starts on the side of the ASA the tunnel established as usual.

  I checked the configurations on both ends and keys, passwords, mirror that LCD seems OK. The only thing that comes to my attention, it's that I have the same set of transformation used for 2 different tunnel on the side of PIX.

  Can I use the same set of transformation on several tunnels or should I set a different transformation for each tunnel? Could be the source of the problem?

  Use it on PIX

  card crypto set pfs group2

  Or on ASA, use:

  card crypto set pfs Group1

• Keep Site to Site VPN Tunnel active for monitoring

  Hi all

  I have a configured site-to-site VPN tunnel only happen when the traffic generated from the remote peer. is it possible to keep the still active tunnel once after the tunnel is established.

  My requirement is to monitor VPN to see availability, so need to ping one of the natd(8) ip on the remote end, but it will come only when the traffic generated end peer.  currently the timers of default on SA is configured

  Help, please...

  Thank you

  Mikael

  TARGET_GP group policy attributes

  VPN-idle-timeout no

• General.UserAgent.override < site > is not working since upgrade to 25 FF

  I usually visit a few sites which prevents non - IE users, for sites I fake my useragent by adding general.useragent.override.address.com about: config page.
  Since I've upgraded to firefox 25, that no longer work, I've seen this thread:
  https://support.Mozilla.org/en-us/questions/976003
  userAgent removed swich addone and restarted firefox - nothing happened, my useragent on these web sites is always FF by default.

  General.UserAgent.site_specific_overrides and general.useragent.enable_overrides are set to true.

  OS: ubuntu 13.04, 64-bit

  It no longer works.

  For reading as Bugzilla isn't a forum like here.

  Bug 933959 - general.useragent.override.[domain] (about:config entry) stopped working
  

• I need a version 3.0 - ish of Firefox which is used on a registration site the webmaster has not upgraded and debugged the site to be compatible with Firefox 4.

  The site

  https://Fourwinds.com/OCF/login.php

  only works with Firefox as browser. The webmaster does not have upgraded and debugging for use with Firefox 4. I'm hoping to find a copy of the version 3.0 - ish to be able to access this web site. Any suggestions?

  You can get Firefox 3.6 http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

  If it's just for a site, an alternative is to keep Firefox 4 but install the portable version of the earlier version of Firefox on your hard drive. You can get http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable - section version inherited at the bottom of this page contains links to older versions of Firefox.

• When I ask for help for XP drivers, typing a help site I get ONLY an upgrade to Win 7. This isn't what I asked! Where available technical support before information I want?

  I HAVE Win 7.gold I information NEED in XP for upgrades and drivers disks... When you go to these websites I ONLY get marks for the upgrade to Windows 7. This isn't what I need!   Windows 7 works on main PC with the strength to use it. The PC, I need to is a P - IV with a beard!

  Hi lefty637,

  1. what drivers XP did you?
  2. what previous available information are you looking for?

  Windows XP drivers are always available on the site for manufacturer of device or system. If you are looking for a Windows XP driver, then visit the system or device manufacturer to download and install it.
  See the search for Compatible for Windows XP device drivers
  See also, information material for Windows XP device drivers

  If you are looking for something else, then we provide more information, so that we can better help you.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Site to Site VPN tunnel is not come between 2 routers

  Dear all,

  I have 2 routers for branch which is configured for VPN site-to-site, but the tunnel does not come!

  I ran debug and I enclose herwith output for your kind review and recommendation. I also enclose here the 2 routers configs branch.

  Any idea on why the Site to site VPN is not coming?

  Kind regards

  Haitham

  You guessed it!

  Just because you have re-used the same card encryption for LAN to LAN and vpn-client traffic.

  This from the DOC CD

  No.-xauth

  (Optional) Use this keyword if the router to router IP Security (IPSec) is on the same card encryption as a virtual private network (VPN) - client - to-Cisco-IOS IPSec. This keyword prevents the router causing the peer for the information of extended authentication (Xauth) (username and password).

• Static - VPN Site to Site DMVPN Tunnel

  Hello

  I have two sites, Site-a with Cisco ASA 5505 static IP Configuration & Site-B 1841 Cisco ISR with dynamic IP Configuration.

  See the diagram attached for a glimpse.

  The goal is to have the tunnel VPN Site to Site between the site of two so that desktop sitting in Site B can access the server applications residing in the Site-A.

  Please suggest

  Concerning

  @Mohammed

  Hello

  A site to Site IPSec, the ASA is the static side and he should have the 'dynamic' configuration, and the side Dynamics SRI 1841 should have the static side:

  I'll give an example configuration to achieve, but you can use a different encryption algorithms:

  ASA 5505:

  Phase 1:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

   
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultL2LGroup

  pre-shared-key cisco123

   

• remote users access site ipsec tunnel

  How to configure the ACL and the road to allow remote users access to site ipsec as local users?

  Current scenario is

  1. distance users (192.168.2.0/24) ipsec <->Cisco 870 (192.168.0.0/24)

  (2 cisco 870(192.168.0.0/24) ipsec tunnel <->cisco 1811 (10.0.0.0/24)

  Now remote users can access the 192.168.0.0 network, no problem, but how they can access 10.0.0.0 network?

  I guess I can do like this:

  1. in cisco 870, site to site ip 192.168.0.0 tunnel allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  (add) permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  2. in the site-to-site vpn cisco 1811

  (add) permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  3. in settings vpn split cisco870 add the 10.0.0.0/24 network

  Is this fair?

  Thank you.

  You must configure the interesting traffic that an ACL contains the source is remote destination as local LAN and LAN.

• KeepAlive in site to site VPN tunnel

  I was asked a question by a colleague today if there is any way that a keepalive

  can be configured so that site to site tunnels would remain place, vs having to have interesting traffic to allow the ISAKMP

  negotiations occur to bring up the tunnel on the SAA.

  The configuration is of a PIX running version 6.3.3 on one end to the other end, which is a code running ASA 8.3.1.

  Is there a function which would leave the tunnel to the top?

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Phase2 is defined using the encryption card, as follows:

  card crypto xxx 1 set security-association life seconds xxxxxx

• Unable to pass traffic between ASA Site to Site VPN Tunnel

  Hello

  I have problems passing traffic between two ASA firewall. The VPN tunnel is up with a dynamic IP and static IP address. I have attached a diagram of the VPN connection. I'm not sure where the problem lies and what to check next. I think I have all the roads and in the access lists are needed.

  I've also attached the ASA5505 config and the ASA5510.

  This is the first time that I've set up a VPN connection any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Adam

  Hello

  Regarding your opinion of configuration Remote Site ASA that you have not added the internal networks of the Central Site VPN L2L configurations at all so the traffic does not pass through the VPN.

   access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.226.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.226.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 10.182.0.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.170.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.172.0 255.255.*.* access-list exempt extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.128 140.15.0.0 255.255.*.* 

  Take a look at ACL configurations above. The 'exempt' ACL is used in configurations NAT0 and tells the ASA what traffic of exempting from NAT. "outside_1_cryptomap" ACL is used to tell the traffic between the subnets should be using the L2L VPN connection.

  So in short on the Remote Site ASA these ACLs should be identical. Make additions to the LIST of VPN L2L, then try again.

  I would also like to point out that to ensure that the Central ASAs L2L VPN ACL Site contains the same networks. The ACL on the Central Site will, of course, its internal subnets as the source and the site LAN remote destination.

  THW out of ' crypto ipsec to show his " shows you that only the SA between binding Site Central network and the Remote Site LAN was established. Others have not formed as the configuration is lacking at LEAST on the Remote Site ASA. Can also be the Central Site.

  -Jouni

• disconnecting from site-to-site vpn tunnel

  Dear Cisco

  I use the Cisco ASA 5505 5 builed VPN site to site.

  B, C, D, E of the site all site-to-site VPN A with only IPSEC IKEv2 configurartion site.

  Reading the Site an ASDM.  Monitoring VPN can always read all four sites are connected.  But I found that Site D and E during connection reset periodically with a few hours.

  (1) I would like to know the connection during the reset time is normal or not?

  (2) any installation or configuration can refine the site to site VPN.  Make VPN tunnel more stable?

  (3) any menthod can monitor VPN site-to-site is health or not?

  Thank you very much for your help

  Alan.

  A. in general, the time is set to 86400 for expiration. It can also be defined by the amount of traffic

  (B) Yes. Try turning on KeepAlive IKE

  C. check the logs is as far as I know of

  This is a good doc on VPN

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a00807e0aca.shtml

• Crossed between the remote access client to a remote site at a Site in Tunnel

  Here's the scenario: users access remote vpn in ASA5510 with the tunneling split. The ASA has a tunnel from one site to another site. Vpn remote access users must be able to come and then go back devices on this tunnel from site to site. Is it still possible? Most of what I see on crossed is internet access when not to use the tunneling split.

  Thank you!

  You can do this job.  First of all, you should make sure that the command "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface" is configured.  You will then want to update your remote access ACL to include accessible subnets via the split tunneling L2L tunnel.  In this way, customers will receive a static route routing traffic through the tunnel for remote access.  The ACL crypto for the L2L tunnel shall include either a specific or analytical entry to the pool of the VPN client to destination subnets.  The corresponding crypto ACL on the far side of the tunnel L2L will need to be updated with a mirror reverse configuration of hub.  Finally, if you have configured on the NAT ASA, you will need to include a rule of exemption for the pool of VPN client-> remote subnet traffic flow.