Site to Site VPN and remote access on PIX 6.3 (3)

Similar Questions

• You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

  We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

  Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

  My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

  Hi John,.

  Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

  CSCuc75090  Details of bug

  The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

  Symptom:

  When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

  Conditions:

  It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

  The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

  Workaround solution:

  N/A

  Some possible workarounds are:

  Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

  Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

  Below some information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

  Hope this helps,

  Luis.

• L2l VPN and remote access VPN

  Hello

  I have 2 Cisco Pix (Pix1, Pix2) 515E (8.0.4). Between these devices exist VPN L2L, which are configured on the external interfaces. On Pix2 I configured remote access VPN on the external interface, too.

  Is it possible to achieve LAN behind Pix1, by using remote access VPN on Pix2 then VPN L2L?

  I don't want to set up remote access on Pix1.

  Thank you very much.

  Kind regards

  Vladislav

  NAT (outside) 1 140.40.30.0 255.255.255.0 (PAT for RA vpn to access the internet if you complete tunnel)

  It is simply because I have configured tunnel RA as complete tunnel instead of split, nat (outside) 1 at the RA 140.40.30.0 pool have internet access through your firewall ASA_SITE_B and translate with global ID 1 who is your external interface of the firewall SA_SITE_B. This has nothing to do with what you are trying to accomplish, but I posted it because it was part of the very common scenario. There are some example PIX 6.3 cases where you will need split tunnel so that RA users have internet access not passing not through the encrypted tunnel code 6.0 does not feature of intra-interface support but 7.x above is of the code. Other examples are that some people configure split RA RA user tunnel will have access to their local resources in their homes as the printers network etc...

  It is therefore, I need to translate 172.27.1.0/24 RA pool?

  No there is no address translation in place in this scenario to work and you don't need to translate something too long, there is no of networks that overlap in one of the SITES u do not need to translate, this scenario is completely free sheep as you access lists free of nat in two firewalls for networks involved in communication in tunnels ASA_SITE_B.

  Because I want to see IP addresses from PIX_SITE_A to 172.27.1.0/24, not 140.40.30.0/24. Is it possible to do it this way?

  Im not clear on this issue, but if I think what it means, it's possible but you need to have political NATing but I think this will make complicated setup, I would say to make this as simple as possible.

  Concerning

  All helpful PLS rate valid if it helped

• CSA with the Client VPN and remote access

  Hello world!

  I have the folowing isue: I have to tune in to the CSA for a clinet it connects remote with VPN Client only. He should not be able to connect to any other network or lan or dial-up.

  No idea what the policy should change or tune?

  Thank you

  You can create an access network rule that depends on a State of the system. The State of the system can be defined to have a game of skill, which belongs to the range of VPN and the network access rule would declare that the client computer cannot act as a server on UDP/TCP ports when the State of the system is ensured.

  So, if the laptop is not connected to the VPN, it would not be able to act as a server for connections to all and will be locked out. You will need to create an exception for the IP address of the VPN server to your corporate offices and allow the CSA client opening these ports.

• AnyConnect 3.0 supports IPSec VPN for remote access?

  Hello world

  I've read about Cisco AnyConnect 3.0 issues that it supports IPSec VPN for remote access:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/qa_c67-622477_ns1049_Networking_Solutions_Q_and_A.html

  I downloaded and installed the Client AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.0.0629, but I'm not able to get the IPSec VPN works. Also, it has no option to use the previous of Cisco IPSec VPN client PCF files.

  Can someone point me in the right direction to get IPSec VPN AnyConnect 3.0 work?

  Thank you in advance!

  Hello

  Takes AnyConnect support IPSEC from version 3.0, but only in combination with IKEv2.

  There is no option to use a CPF file with it and the config should be pushed through a profile Anyconnect.

  More information on this:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/vpn_client/AnyConnect/anyconnect30/Administration/Guide/ac02asaconfig.html#wp1325361

  You should also change the ASA config so that it accepts negotiations IKE v2:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/vpn_ike.html#wp1144572

  Kind regards

  Nicolas

• Routing and remote access - on three subnetworked, two subnet unable to reach to the internet!

  Hello

  Good evening everyone.

  I had a problem in Routing and remote access on windows 2003 server.  This server is already configured as a file server, domain server, and application server. Also configured as a router (thanks to access routing & remote) to connect the three different networks with each other. If this server has three NICs installed and each separate NIC network cards represent.

  three different networks are - 192.42.160.0/24, 192.42.161.0/24, 192.42.162.0/24

  Three cards of the NETWORK adapter installed on the server as with the IP - next

  NIC - 1 = 192.42.160.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  NIC - 2 = 192.42.161.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - 192.161.220.112 (this ip address for internet access then 4 g router IP)

  -3 = 192.42.162.220, NETWORK cards, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  Now the question is I can get Internet & (also scathing in router ip 192.42.161.112) one network i.e. - 192.42.161.0/24, BUT when I try to access the internet from another two network (192.42.160.0/24 & 192.42.162.0/24) I can not access and in addition can not ping to internet router ip - 192.42.161.112...

  So, how do I access the internet to another two network also?

  I was already the configuration of static routing for all three network but I wasn't always successful. I don't really know what exactly static routing this should be done in access routing & remote area so that all three network can reach to the internet?

  Here is the result of the current track...

  D:\Documents and Settings\Administrateur > route print

  IPv4 routing table
  ===========================================================================
  List of the interface
  0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
  0x2... 00 30 05 8f ad 5 c... Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet - Mi Teefer2
  niport
  0 x 3... 0E 00 c4 f8 a7 0c... Network Intel(r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter - Teefer2 M
  iniport
  0 x 4... 0E 00 0c a7 c5 85... Intel (r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter #2 - Teefer
  2 miniport
  ===========================================================================
  ===========================================================================
  Active routes:
  Network Destination gateway metric Interface subnet mask
  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.42.161.112 192.42.161.220 1
  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
  192.42.160.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.160.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.160.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.161.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.161.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.161.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.162.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  192.42.162.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.162.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 1
  Default gateway: 192.42.161.112
  ===========================================================================
  Persistent routes:
  None

  Sorry if I'm not able to explain properly. Please let me know if you have to explain more about it...

  Thank you all.

  Mahesh

  Hello Manu,

  Please post this question in the forums TechNet for Windows Server 2003. They will be able to guide you further.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• The Routing and remote access could not start, error 214500037 (0x80004005)

  My windows server 2003 r2, failed to start the Routing and remote access services. And in the event an observer log, it has error code
  Event ID: 7024, with service specific error 2147500037 (0x80004005)
  I tried to reset tcp/ip and replace ias.mdb and dnary.mdb by a new, but it did not work.

  Thank you

  Hi budhihartono,

  Since you are facing problems with windows server 2003 r2, it would be better suited in the Technet Windows forum. Please post your question in the following TechNet Windows server forum to improve assistance:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• VPN Site to Site and remote access

  I have ASA certified with 25 concurrent VPN connections. I want to know if I have 20 remote tunnels and 5 Site-to-Site created on the same time tunnels, and I want to establish the new Site to the other tunnel, is him Site to Site remove the remote tunnels or can not put in place. Site at tunnels have a higher priority than the remote access or they are the same. Site at tunnels are more important to me and I need them to repress the remote access tunnels.

  Hello

  Sorry for the confusion. No you can not set the parameter like this.

  Thank you

  Gilbert

• Filtering of VPN and local access to the remote site

  Hello

  I set up vpn, filtering on all my VPN l2l. I have limited access to remote resources at the local level to the specified ports. It works perfectly.

  But I want to have as full access from local to remote networks (but still retain the remote access to the local level). VPN filter now works as I have two-way with a simple ACL. So is it possible to open all the traffic from the local to remote and all by limiting the remote to the local traffic?

  ASA 5520 8.4 (3)

  Thanks in advance

  Tomasz Mowinski

  Hello

  Well let's say you have a filtering ACL rule when you allow http local network traffic to the remote host

  LAN: 10.10.10.0/24

  remote host: 192.168.10.10/32

  The filter ACL rule is the following:

  FILTER-ACL access-list permit tcp host 192.168.10.10 eq 80 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  I think that this ACL rule would mean also that until the remote host has been using source port TCP/80, it may access any port on any host tcp in your local network as long as it uses the source TCP/80 port.

  I guess you could add a few ranges of ports or even service groups of objects to the ACL rules so that not all well-known ports would be accessible on the LAN. But I guess that could complicate the configurations.

  We are usually management customer and completely different in ASA L2L VPN that allows us to all traffic on another filtering device and do not work in this kind of problems. But of course there are some of the situations/networks where this is not only possible and it is not a feasible option for some because of the costs of having an ASA extra.

  Please indicate if you have found any useful information

  -Jouni

• Routing and Remote Access Server & VPN

  We have Server Windows 2008 R2, which is our domain, but also DHCP server controller. On this server we have Setup RRA for VPN and it works fine. We had to stop our DC due to a failure and after I got the domain controller to the top and it is a problem for users that connect to the VPN.

  When users try to connect to the VPN, it connects successfully. But they did not access network as usual. I looked in the VPN properties, and it receives an IP address of 169.254.xxx.xx which is not the correct network IP address. So while the user who is remote think they are connected, they are currently not connected.

  Does anyone have advice what is the cause of this and how to troubleshoot or resolve?

  Hello

  Given that you are working on Windows 2008 R2 please post your question here:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• PIX 515E and remote access VPN

  I use a PIX 515E with: ASDM Version: 5,0000 51 PIX Version: 8.0 (4) and configure it with remote access VPN.

  I would like to get an email every time that a user login (and or disconnection) to the VPN. Remote clients use the Cisco VPN Client.

  Any help is appreciated,

  Hello

  Here is a link to the email configuration when you log in to the ASA/PIX: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/pix-500-series-security-appliances/63884-config-asa-00.html#anc7

  Then you can create a list of message to send the logs only for the connection/disconnection of the VPN user: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/pix-500-series-security-appliances/63884-config-asa-00.html#anc18

  There is a wire that is linked here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/10798976/asa-email-logging-issue

• AnyConnect VPN and LAN access

  When remote users to connect to the Cisco ASA VPN and authenticate with Cisco AnyConnect client, they then full access to the environment internal of LAN of business as if they were sitting at their desks in the Office of the Corporation.

  Right?

  After that the remote client authenticates to the AnyConnect VPN, it is sensible to then run remote users of traffic through the corporate firewall (outside to inside) before allowing LAN access full corporate?

  Remote_User - vpn - ANYCONNECT-(outside) (inside) firewall - CORP_LAN

  Thank you

  Frank

  Hello

  Yes, by default, all traffic will be sent through the tunnel.

  If there are users VPN shouldn't be able to reach the resources, you need to establish rules for access to it. The best way to do this is by using VPN filter.

• authentication 802. 1 x on cisco VPN for remote access

  I'm on dial-up VPN (mobile VPN) on cisco ASA5510, now, I want to authenticate remote users via Microsoft IAS (Radius Standard) service. However, I couldn't get through the via protocol PEAP authentication process, and it seems that it only supports PAP that isn't safe.

  Any suggestion on how to implement PEAP over VPN remote access?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Glance atv http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806de37e.shtml

  It may be useful.

  Best regards.

  Massimiliano.

• How many group Supportepar ASA 5520 vpn for remote access

  Hello

  Howmany vpn group is supported on asa 5520 with configuraion vpn remote access.

  Concerning

  1 if nat-control is disabled and you do not have any other order NAT in your config file, you do not have it. Try to remove the existing "NAT 0" command and "clear xlate."

  2. you must ensure that your network inside know they can go by ASA to access remote vpn client IP. You have any device layer 3 behind the ASA that does the routing. If so, please verify that this is the routing table.

• VPN 3005 remote access concentrator

  I inherited 2 VPN 3005 one in production with a weird config, probably because the one who set up was having a similar problem. The other I'm trying to configure correctly and will then move users who him. It has a public IP address and the private port has an address on the local network. I have installed a swimming pool with a different subnet. My client connects but cannot get on the local network. I ping the local of the 3005 but nothing past interface.

  Thank you

  Eric

  Hello

  As I understand it, the tunnel is to establish properly (so no problem on the VPN config).

  If you check under surveillance | Sessions make you see the session to set up remote access? Also see packets received/transmitted?

  I would check that the internal LAN has a default gateway pointing to the internal IP address of the hub (or at least a route to access) to be able to send packets to the VPN clients.

  Federico.