VPN Site to Site and remote access

Similar Questions

• PIX site to site and remote access

  Dear guy

  I have a PIX 515e with version 8.0 and the other side a 2811 router, the vpn site to site between these two devices is implemented, but I want some remote clients can connect to pix,.

  so is this possibe two implement a site to access remote vpn on pix interface (outside)?

  any clue?

  Hello

  Yes, it is quite possible. Please see attached the sample configuration. Note This is for pix v7.x, but it should work fine for 8.x

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807f9a89.shtml

  HTH

  Jon

• Site to Site VPN and remote access on PIX 6.3 (3)

  Hello

  I have a vpn site-to site to remote access configured on the pix device. Everything works like a charm until I decide to perform authentication of the local client for remote vpn clients using the same card encryption from site to site. Thus, the tunnel from site to site is broken because that is trying to authenticate the local user.

  Is it possible to use the authentication of the remote local user for vpn clients on PIX without breaking other tunnels that use the same cryptomap?

  If the answer is to use separate crypro card so how can I assign the other encryption to use outside of the interface card, if only a single encryption card can be assigned to any given interface?

  When you configure the isakmp key, use the command

  ISAKMP KeyString keys by the peer-address [mask netmask] [No.-xauth] [No.-config-mode]

  No.-xauth will tell the isakmp won't the isakmp xauth for L2L and non-config-mode does not distribute the ip address of the peer L2L.

  Let us know if it works

  -Vikas

• How can I get my list of sites and FTP access, password etc... (old win 7 on an external drive)

  Hello, this is not considered a regular registered sites export (I have many)... and it's a mistake.

  In short, after computer out, I got the hard drive I have USB (old win 7 pro on an external drive)

  How can I get my list of sites and FTP access, password etc...

  they are encrypted in the registry if I'm not mistaken?

  any idea?

  Thank you.

  (Google translation)

  proceedings found:

  Just do an export of the new common/site .reg file and the modifier with the values of the old and then importing, everything works

  Thank you

• Routing and remote access - on three subnetworked, two subnet unable to reach to the internet!

  Hello

  Good evening everyone.

  I had a problem in Routing and remote access on windows 2003 server.  This server is already configured as a file server, domain server, and application server. Also configured as a router (thanks to access routing & remote) to connect the three different networks with each other. If this server has three NICs installed and each separate NIC network cards represent.

  three different networks are - 192.42.160.0/24, 192.42.161.0/24, 192.42.162.0/24

  Three cards of the NETWORK adapter installed on the server as with the IP - next

  NIC - 1 = 192.42.160.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  NIC - 2 = 192.42.161.220, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - 192.161.220.112 (this ip address for internet access then 4 g router IP)

  -3 = 192.42.162.220, NETWORK cards, Sub - 255.255.255.0, gateway - No.

  Now the question is I can get Internet & (also scathing in router ip 192.42.161.112) one network i.e. - 192.42.161.0/24, BUT when I try to access the internet from another two network (192.42.160.0/24 & 192.42.162.0/24) I can not access and in addition can not ping to internet router ip - 192.42.161.112...

  So, how do I access the internet to another two network also?

  I was already the configuration of static routing for all three network but I wasn't always successful. I don't really know what exactly static routing this should be done in access routing & remote area so that all three network can reach to the internet?

  Here is the result of the current track...

  D:\Documents and Settings\Administrateur > route print

  IPv4 routing table
  ===========================================================================
  List of the interface
  0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
  0x2... 00 30 05 8f ad 5 c... Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet - Mi Teefer2
  niport
  0 x 3... 0E 00 c4 f8 a7 0c... Network Intel(r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter - Teefer2 M
  iniport
  0 x 4... 0E 00 0c a7 c5 85... Intel (r) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter #2 - Teefer
  2 miniport
  ===========================================================================
  ===========================================================================
  Active routes:
  Network Destination gateway metric Interface subnet mask
  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.42.161.112 192.42.161.220 1
  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
  192.42.160.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.160.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.160.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  192.42.161.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.161.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.161.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  192.42.162.0 255.255.255.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  192.42.162.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
  192.42.162.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 20
  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 20
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.160.220 192.42.160.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.161.220 192.42.161.220 1
  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.42.162.220 192.42.162.220 1
  Default gateway: 192.42.161.112
  ===========================================================================
  Persistent routes:
  None

  Sorry if I'm not able to explain properly. Please let me know if you have to explain more about it...

  Thank you all.

  Mahesh

  Hello Manu,

  Please post this question in the forums TechNet for Windows Server 2003. They will be able to guide you further.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• The Routing and remote access could not start, error 214500037 (0x80004005)

  My windows server 2003 r2, failed to start the Routing and remote access services. And in the event an observer log, it has error code
  Event ID: 7024, with service specific error 2147500037 (0x80004005)
  I tried to reset tcp/ip and replace ias.mdb and dnary.mdb by a new, but it did not work.

  Thank you

  Hi budhihartono,

  Since you are facing problems with windows server 2003 r2, it would be better suited in the Technet Windows forum. Please post your question in the following TechNet Windows server forum to improve assistance:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• A Site to remote access VPN behind the same public IP address

  Got a problem quite stupid.  We have a VPN from Site to Site configured for a new data center, which will be responsible for general traffic management.  In addition, some users need to use use a VPN client to access certain areas.  The firewall at the Office only has a public IP address, so the two will come to the Site to Site VPN for remote access from the same source.

  This seems a problem with legacy Cisco VPN clients because encryption card matches the entry VPN site-to-site, even if they use VPN clients.  A good/simple solution to solve this problem?

  Some newspapers (198.18.85.23) is the address public IP for the office and the tom.jones is the user.  192.168.1.0/24 is the pool of the VPN client.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713130-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 737003-5-ASA: PISG: DHCP not configured, no viable servers found for tunnel-group "Corp-VPN.

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713119-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713061: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, IPSec tunnel rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card remote proxy 192.168.1.4/255.255.255.255/0/0 local 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 on the interface outside

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x00007fff28dab560, mess id 0x37575f3c).

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-3-713902: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % 713259-5-ASA: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, Session is be demolished. Reason: political crypto card not found

  January 7, 2014 19:12:52 ASA5515: % ASA-4-113019: Group = Corp-VPN, Username = tom.smith, IP = 198.18.85.23, disconnected Session. Session type: IKEv1, duration: 0 h: 00 m: 02s, xmt bytes: 0, RRs bytes: 0, right: not found card crypto policy

  January 7, 2014 19:12:53 ASA5515: % 713904-5-ASA: IP = 198.18.85.23, encrypted packet received with any HIS correspondent, drop

  Hello

  Don't know if this will work, but you can try the following configuration (with the rest of the VPN configuration)

  list-access CLIENT VPN ip enable any 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 is the VPN CLIENT address

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set peer 198.18.85.23

  card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-3DES-SHA

  The idea would be to have the ACL matches the VPN full Tunnel that the Client attempts to establish. (destination "any" from the point of view of the customer, the ASAs view source)

  I tested briefly on my own SAA by connecting from an IP address to which the ASA offers free VPN in L2L. But as I don't have the operational L2L VPN, I can't really verify the VPN L2L at the moment. Thus, certain risks may be involved if you can afford it.

  -Jouni

• ASA5505 VPN Site to site and limiting access - URGENT

  I'll admit knowledge limited to the front, so forgive me if I look like a fool.  The company that I work began recently to hosting our application for some of our customers. to do this, we are renting rack space, connections and equipment in a data center.  We must send data to our request for an application in the center of data of our customers.  They have an ASA 5505.

  Our data center will support VPN site-to-site and nothing else.  Our client find it unacceptable, citing security and the inability to restrict access to only the small number of servers, our application needs to access.  I have to be able to talk intelligently and with the facts (and, preferably, examples of configuration on hand) with their staff of the IOC and network in the next day or so.

  The ASA 5505 can be configured for a VPM from site to site with our data center which limits our application server to access a limited set of IP addresses within their network?  If so, this is quite easily possible?  Anyone done this?

  Thank you

  Leighton Wingerd

  Leighton,

  Sounds complicated problem - but are simple actuall.  Remember that a VPN ensures the transmission from site A to site B on a precarious environment - internet.  For example, you can DEFINE the traffic that goes through the VPN, you also DEFINE the traffic that will launch the VPN tunnel in the first place.  With these statements said - using your supposed information you would create valuable traffic as the exact traffic you want to allow through the vpn;

  access-list permits datacentre_2_client tcp host 1.2.3.4 host 192.168.1.2 eq 1521

  And you will use the same ACL to set which can cross traffic.  However, I know for a fact that an ODBC Oracle connection uses more than one TCP port!

  The confidentiality of data is something else - that your customer needs to define requirements.  An SSL connection is fine and dandy - you will just be to encrypt the traffic twice!

• L2l VPN and remote access VPN

  Hello

  I have 2 Cisco Pix (Pix1, Pix2) 515E (8.0.4). Between these devices exist VPN L2L, which are configured on the external interfaces. On Pix2 I configured remote access VPN on the external interface, too.

  Is it possible to achieve LAN behind Pix1, by using remote access VPN on Pix2 then VPN L2L?

  I don't want to set up remote access on Pix1.

  Thank you very much.

  Kind regards

  Vladislav

  NAT (outside) 1 140.40.30.0 255.255.255.0 (PAT for RA vpn to access the internet if you complete tunnel)

  It is simply because I have configured tunnel RA as complete tunnel instead of split, nat (outside) 1 at the RA 140.40.30.0 pool have internet access through your firewall ASA_SITE_B and translate with global ID 1 who is your external interface of the firewall SA_SITE_B. This has nothing to do with what you are trying to accomplish, but I posted it because it was part of the very common scenario. There are some example PIX 6.3 cases where you will need split tunnel so that RA users have internet access not passing not through the encrypted tunnel code 6.0 does not feature of intra-interface support but 7.x above is of the code. Other examples are that some people configure split RA RA user tunnel will have access to their local resources in their homes as the printers network etc...

  It is therefore, I need to translate 172.27.1.0/24 RA pool?

  No there is no address translation in place in this scenario to work and you don't need to translate something too long, there is no of networks that overlap in one of the SITES u do not need to translate, this scenario is completely free sheep as you access lists free of nat in two firewalls for networks involved in communication in tunnels ASA_SITE_B.

  Because I want to see IP addresses from PIX_SITE_A to 172.27.1.0/24, not 140.40.30.0/24. Is it possible to do it this way?

  Im not clear on this issue, but if I think what it means, it's possible but you need to have political NATing but I think this will make complicated setup, I would say to make this as simple as possible.

  Concerning

  All helpful PLS rate valid if it helped

• PIX 515E and remote access VPN

  I use a PIX 515E with: ASDM Version: 5,0000 51 PIX Version: 8.0 (4) and configure it with remote access VPN.

  I would like to get an email every time that a user login (and or disconnection) to the VPN. Remote clients use the Cisco VPN Client.

  Any help is appreciated,

  Hello

  Here is a link to the email configuration when you log in to the ASA/PIX: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/pix-500-series-security-appliances/63884-config-asa-00.html#anc7

  Then you can create a list of message to send the logs only for the connection/disconnection of the VPN user: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/pix-500-series-security-appliances/63884-config-asa-00.html#anc18

  There is a wire that is linked here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/10798976/asa-email-logging-issue

• Routing and remote access to the Server 2003

  I configured the remote access and routing service in my Server 2003 duly NAT enabled. All my clients are not in the field. All use internet and intranet connection using my proxy authentication provided by the administrator of the proxy server. I would like to restrict the clients except intranet connection. How to limit the customer?

  Post in the Windows Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

• Create odbc connection between local access and remote access or sql remote

  I need to connect to a remote access or sql database using my local in access 2007 version.  I can't understand what I put in each of the available boxes.  I see only a SQL driver to the system section of the odbc Wizard.  If I decide that he wants to know where the sql server is... well, it's not local, I have a web address for this and may not know how to get the systΦme can recognize the information remotely.  Help, please!

  Means of access:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Office/default.aspx

  Office at the above link forums

  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/addbuz

  Access support at the link above.

  They will help you with your questions of access when repost you in the Office Forums above.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Two tunnels from site to site and vpnclient access

  I have 2 remote sites, 1 with a static ip address and 1 with a dynamic ip address, they connect to a central site that has a PIX 501. I could get 2 ipsec tunnels works well for awhile, but my client wants to just now the possibility of having workers use the vpnclient to connect to the PIX as well. The problem I have is after you have added the config of vpngroup my site with the dynamic ip address can no longer connect. I had to use the ip address they have now and install an aditional counterpart in the card crypto, but if this ip address change I have to come in and change the config.

  Here's the relevant info in the config:

  IPSec ip 192.168.100.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 192.168.100.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 192.168.100.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 192.168.125.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 192.168.100.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 192.168.101.0 255.255.255.0

  ipsec2 192.168.100.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.125.0 255.255.255.0

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac oadcset

  Crypto-map dynamic oadcdynmap 30 transform-set oadcset

  oadcmap 21 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  oadcmap 21 match address ipsec crypto map

  oadcmap 21 crypto map set peer

  card crypto oadcmap 21 transform-set oadcset

  oadcmap 22 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto oadcmap 22 correspondence address ipsec2

  crypto oadcmap 22 card set peer

  card crypto oadcmap 22 transform-set oadcset

  map oadcmap 25-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic oadcdynmap

  oadcmap interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key * address netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

  ISAKMP key * address netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 21

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 21

  ISAKMP strategy 21 md5 hash

  21 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP strategy life 21 28800

  vpngroup address oadcclient pool oadcgroup

  vpngroup dns 192.168.100.3 Server oadcgroup

  vpngroup oadcgroup by default-field clientdomain.com

  vpngroup idle 1800 oadcgroup-time

  vpngroup password oadcgroup *.

  Any help is appreciated,

  Ken

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac oadcset

  Crypto-map dynamic oadcdynmap1 30 set transform-set oadcset

  Dynamic crypto map match 30 oadcdynmap1 address ipsec2

  Crypto-map dynamic oadcdynmap 30 transform-set oadcset

  oadcmap 21 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  oadcmap 21 match address ipsec crypto map

  oadcmap 21 crypto map set peer

  card crypto oadcmap 21 transform-set oadcset

  oadcmap 22 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic oadcdynmap1

  map oadcmap 25-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic oadcdynmap

  Try this and see if it helps. I have something similar on a router do not know if the PIX supports. Worth a try if

• Routing and Remote Access Server & VPN

  We have Server Windows 2008 R2, which is our domain, but also DHCP server controller. On this server we have Setup RRA for VPN and it works fine. We had to stop our DC due to a failure and after I got the domain controller to the top and it is a problem for users that connect to the VPN.

  When users try to connect to the VPN, it connects successfully. But they did not access network as usual. I looked in the VPN properties, and it receives an IP address of 169.254.xxx.xx which is not the correct network IP address. So while the user who is remote think they are connected, they are currently not connected.

  Does anyone have advice what is the cause of this and how to troubleshoot or resolve?

  Hello

  Given that you are working on Windows 2008 R2 please post your question here:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

• L2L pix 501 and remote access VPN

  Hi, I'm working on an old 501 PIX w / Software 6.3 (5), he already have access to remote VPN configuration and works very well, but now he needs a L2L implemented. One thing I try to do all the work remotely via VPN or ssh to the machine. I don't know what's on the other end, but they swear that it is set up and maybe my problem is when I start putting in orders for the other VPN it breaks the remote VPN access. One thing that I have to do is NAT a host on the inside to appear as another host on the end. I use these commands and I think it works cannot be said.

  access-list 101 permit ip remote_network 255.255.255.0 local_server host

  public static 10.1.0.203 (inside, outside) - access list 101

  then

  access-list 102 permit ip host 10.1.0.203 192.168.50.83
  access-list 102 permit ip host 10.1.0.203 192.168.50.86
  access-list 102 permit ip host 10.1.0.203 192.168.50.50
  access-list 102 permit ip host 10.1.0.203 192.168.50.85

  and use it to match against

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  EMDs-map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  correspondence address card crypto emds-map 10 102
  card crypto emds-map 10 peers set remote_vpn_server
  card crypto emds-card 10 set of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

  then

  ISAKMP key magic_key address remote_vpn_server netmask 255.255.255.255
  ISAKMP identity hostname
  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10
  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption
  ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash
  10 1 ISAKMP policy group
  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  and that is where it usually breaks the VPN, I don't know if the other VPN works due to not being not able to get to this server to try to ping, I don't really like to try this stuff remotely but I don't have a lot of choice at the moment.

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  Jarrid Graham

  Yes, just use the number of different sequence with 1 name of the crypto map. Please also ensure that your dynamic crypto map, which is your vpn client has the sequence down the crypto map (more), because you want to make sure that the static crypto map (for lan-to-lan tunnel has higher sequence number (lower number)).

  The political isakmp sequence number does not match, it is processed from top to bottom (number less than the high number) and also long 1 set of isakmp policy corresponds to the remote peer, it will be negotiated properly.

  Hope that answers your question and please note useful post. Thank you.