Site to site VPN help

Similar Questions

• site IPSec VPN help!

  I im doing site vpn to the other for the first time on a 891 to an rv 120 (gui), but it doesn't connect. I think it could be my list of access on the 891. the error I get in the rv120 is

  08/12/02 18:15:35: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Phase 1 negotiation failed because the time for xx.xx.xx.xx [500]. ea65b6c91b9e73de:0000000000000000

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Configuration found for xx.xx.xx.xx.

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: opening new phase 1 negotiation: xx.xx.xx.xx [500]<=>xx.xx.xx.xx [500]

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Start Identity Protection mode.

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:180]: XXX: NUMNATTVENDORIDS: 3

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 4

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 8

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 9

  2012-08-02 18:16:11: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: ignore the information because the message has no payload hash.

  2012-08-02 18:16:42: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: invalid protocol SA type: 0

  2012-08-02 18:16:42: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: failure of the Phase 2 negotiation because of the waiting time for the phase 1.

  2012-08-02 18:17: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: accept a request to establish IKE - SA: 71.32.110.24

  2012-08-02 18:17: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: schedular is already planned for the creation of the SA for outside: 'xx.xx.xx.xx' 2012-08-02 18:17: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: could not attach schedSaCreate in IKE configuraion

  891 config

  =====================================================

  pool dhcp IP test

  Network 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  default router 10.10.10.1

  Server DNS 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4

  !

  !

  IP cef

  8.8.8.8 IP name-server

  IP-server names 8.8.4.4

  No ipv6 cef

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key Testingkey address xx.xx.xx.xxx

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set test1 ah-md5-hmac esp-3des

  !

  maptest1 map ipsec-isakmp crypto 2

  defined peer xx.xx.xx.xx

  Set transform-set test1

  match address 100

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet8

  Qwest connection description

  no ip address

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  PPPoE enable global group

  PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1

  maptest1 card crypto

  !

  !

  interface Vlan1

  Quest description

  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  !

  interface Dialer1

  the negotiated IP address

  IP mtu 1492

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  encapsulation ppp

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1452

  Dialer pool 1

  Dialer-Group 1

  PPP authentication chap callin pap

  PPP chap hostname xxxxxxxxx

  PPP chap password 0 xxxxxxxx

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  !

  the IP nat inside source 1 list overload of the Dialer1 interface

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1

  !

  access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255

  category of access list 100 remark maptest1 = 4

  Note access-list 100 IPSec rule

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  Dialer-list 100 ip protocol allow

  =======================================================================

  Hi Manny,

  Thanks for the debug output! I believe that we are making some progress and was able to establish phase 1 of IKE. The problem is now to establish IPsec SA or a phase of IKE 2. Could you do the following again once more, and view the results?

  int f8

  no card crypto maptest1

  int d1

  maptest1 card crypto

  Claire crypto his

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Debug crypto ipsec

  ISAKMP crypto to show his

  Crypto ipsec to show his

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Site to site VPN, I need all internet traffic to exit the site.

  I have 2 sites connected via a pair of SRX5308

  A = 192.168.1.0/24

  IP WAN = 1.1.1.1

  B = 192.168.2.0/24

  IP WAN = 2.2.2.2

  Now what I need to do, is to have all traffic from B to go to the site one even traffic destined to the internet. That is, I need internet traffic out of our network with the IP 1.1.1.1, even if it is from the network B.

  On my I have set up a route 1.1.1.1 of the ISP, then a value by default 0/0 to 192.168.1.1 it ASA knows how to get to the peer VPN is a more specific route, but sends everything above the tunnel, at the remote end which then hairpin of ASA routes internet outside its own WAN port traffic.

  I can understand though not how to so the same thing on the pair of SRX5308 they either don't raise the tunnel or internet route to the local site address B.

  Anyone have any ideas?

  I need to do this because we are logging and monitoring of internet traffic to A site via tapping from upstream to various IDS solutions and will not (cannot) reproduce this to all our remote sites.

  Thank you

  Dave.

  After some more thought and testing I came up with a workable solution to my own problem. I'll share it here in case it can help others.

  (1) use the wizard at both ends to implement a normal VPN that connects the two segments of network 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0

  (2) go to site VPN - VPN policy remote router192.168.2.1 and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the remote IP address.

  (c) to apply the change

  3) go to the VPN-> VPN policy on the head end site (192.168.1.1) and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the local IP address

  (c) to apply the change

  Now all the traffic wil go down the VPN tunnel and exit to the internet on the site of head end. Hope this helps others with the same question.

• Site to Site VPN on AZURE

  I have a VPN site-to-site existing on Azure and Azure a new subnet created on the local network that must be able to reach.

  I added the new subnet within azure for the VPN and add a static route on the RRAS server win 2012 for routing.

  On the initial installation of a RRAS-Site VPN site (I didn't configure it) I think the interesting traffic specified must be sent through the VPN Tunnel, but I knew how to specify the new subnet via RRAS, I don't want to delete and re-create the VPN Site to Site.

  Y at - there anyone who can help please.

  Thank you

  Philippe

  Hello

  Your question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you on the Azure MSDN Forums:

  https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-us/home?category=windowsazureplatform

  TechNet forums Azure:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-us/home?category=windowsazureplatform

  TechNet Server forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  TechNet forums:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  MSDN forums:

  https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  See you soon.

• SBS 2008 office1 Serv2008 Office 2 need to share assets between them via a site to site VPN tunnel

  Hi all.

  I really need help on this one.

  The office 1 installer running SBS2008 Office 2 running Server 2008.

  Each firm has its own FQDN Office 1 CompanyABC 2 A_B_C of the company office.

  Each firm has its own internal IP address pool Office 1 192.168.69.xxx and office 192.168.20.xxx 2.

  Site to site VPN tunnel between 2 office routers Netgear SRX5308 1 and 2 Netgear FVS318G Office established and working.

  Each firm has its own DNS server and acts as a domain controller

  How to configure the 2 networks to see each other and be able to use assets on every network (files, printers)?

  Is it so simple that the addition of another pool internal IP for each DNS server?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  "Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials online help"

  https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/home-client.aspx

  TechNet Server forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• IPSec Site to Site VPN Solution needed?

  Hi all

  I need a solution to provide full connectivity to one of my clients. I created two IPSEC Site to Site VPN, one between the INFO and RITA and second between NIDA and RITA. I can access RITA machine that is 172.16.36.101 at the INFO and 10.0.0.5 to NIDA.

  Now, I need to give access to my customer INFORMATION to direct NIDA 10.0.0.5 without established VPN machine to NIDA 10.0.0.5 of 172.16.36.101 access.

  Could you please give me the solution how is that possible?

  Concerning

  Uzair Hussain

  Hi uzair.infotech,

  Looks like you need to set up a grouping between the 3 sites, at the end of that your topology will look like this:

  INFO - RITA - NIDA

  You can check this guide that explains step by step how to configure grouping:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/12752536/how-configure-site-sit...

  Hope this info helps!

  Note If you help!

  -JP-

• site to site VPN

  SH running-config crypto

  I have the following configuration, in order to create a site to site vpn which should not be changed in the configuration below.

  Do I need to add new card crypto?

  And what is the dynamic-map

  I need to create new ipsec transform-set or can I use the existing?

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ikev1 remoteaccess

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac L2Lvpn ikev1

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 999608000 association

  Crypto ipsec pmtu aging infinite - the security association

  Crypto-map dynamic Test 1 set pfs Group1

  Crypto-map dynamic Test 1 set transform-set remoteaccess L2Lvpn ikev1

  Crypto-map dynamic 1jeu reverse-Road Test

  card crypto Test 1-isakmp ipsec dynamic test

  Test interface card crypto outside

  Crypto ca trustpoint _SmartCallHome_ServerCA

  Configure CRL

  Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint0

  Terminal registration

  name of the object CN = TestFW

  Configure CRL

  trustpool crypto ca policy

  crypto isakmp identity address

  Crypto ikev1 allow outside

  IKEv1 crypto policy 1

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 10800

  IKEv1 crypto policy 10

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 1800

  IKEv1 crypto policy 65535

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 1800

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x

  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.

  Thank you

  bluesea2010,

  Next step will be sending real traffic, or just run a package Tracker to ensure that traffic flows very well:

  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.15.x 8 0 172.10.10.x detail

  If all goes well, you should be good to go.

  Hope this info helps!

  Note If you help!

  -JP-

• SA520w routing through site-to-site VPN tunnels

  I have several offices that are connected using site-to-site VPN tunnels and all will use the SA520W (firmware 2.1.18). I currently have 3 routers in place, router tunnels created for the router B and c of router. I need assistance with the configuration to allow the guests to router site B get to the router site C. I have attempted to add a static route, but get a destination unreachable host trying to ping. Also, if I connect to the router site has via the Cisco VPN client, I'm not able to get resources on each site, B, or C.

  A - the site 10.10.0.0/24

  Site B - 10.0.0.0/24

  Site of the C - 10.25.0.0/24

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  So, that's what you have configured correctly?

  RTR_A

  ||

  _____________ || ___________

  ||                                            ||

  RTR_B                                RTR_C

  Since there is no tunnel between B and C there is no way for us past that traffic through RTR_A for two reasons. The most important reason is that subnet 10.25.0.0/24 (rtr_c) is not allowed to pass through the IPSec tunnel (it's okay to IPSec?) of rtr_a ==> rtr_b. You can't just add a statement of road because your addresses are not routable which is the reason why it fails.

  Your only option is to create another tunnel between rtr_b and rtr_c. This may not be the ONLY option, but you should get what you need.

  I hope this helps.

• 887VDSL2 IPSec site to site vpn does NOT use the easy vpn

  Much of community support.

  as I'm looking through the config Guide about 870 router series, only to find information about the config with eazy vpn.

  is there a classic way, about 870 Series site 2 site without eazy vpn IPSec configuration?

  Have a classic way if a tunnel? Have the 870 is not as a vpn client?

  Thank you

  Of course, here's example of Site to Site VPN configuration for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080194650.shtml

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/ps221/products_configuration_example09186a008073e078.shtml

  Hope that helps.

• RV180 restrict access to the Site to Site VPN

  Hello

  I'm trying to set up my network so that VPN traffic is routed only to a physical single on the RV180 port or to a certain subset of devices on a network.

  I have a site to site vpn configuration in a Home Office and connect to the corporate network.  The user has a couple of devices on the home network who need to access the corporate network.

  We hope to leave his PC accessible to its home network and the corporate network, but limit other devices to access the vpn.

  I think that I could do playing with the subnet, but I just can't get my head around it.

  It must be something simpleish to do this, isn't there?

  I'd appreciate any help you have.

  Thank you

  Gary

  Hi boys, here's a hypothetical situation.

  VLAN 1 is port 1

  VLAN 2 is port 2

  VLAN 1 has a switch connected to your local network of services

  VLAN 2 has a switch to maintain your VPN.

  The configuration of the port for each port would be the vlan respective unidentified.

  You can disable the router in order to prohibit intervlan communication. But also, and especially, the vpn is a specific meaning, subnet, you specify the specific ip subnet on the config of the tunnel because the config include not a second subnet will not work it's traffic in the tunnel.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• SSL vpn site to site vpn

  I have a couple of site to site VPN working properly on an ASA 5515. Don't know what is on the other side, as I haven't seen them. I configured a SSL vpn for remote users who must be able to access resources on remote sites. I got access to the network of site without any problems and and have added the range of IP addresses for remote users to links from site to site, but I am unable to connect. Anyone who has this performance, it would be greatly appreciated if you can help.

  Hi mbluemel,

  You need to configure the remote side to allow traffic from the remote side for SSL VPN users.
  This list of documents the measures taken to achieve this: -.

  http://www.petenetlive.com/kb/article/0000040.htm

  For more information: -.
  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• site to site vpn - internal network even on both sides of the tunnel

  Hi all

  I have the following questions about the Site Site VPN using ASA 5510 and 5505

  Scenerio is

  1. we have five branches & headquarters

  2. we want to establish a vpn between branches & Head Office (VPN from Site to Site)

  3. all branches & head office using the same internal network (192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0)

  My question is

  How can I configure VPN site-to-site between branches & head office with the same internal network (192.168.150.0/24)

  Please help me with the configuration steps & explanation

  I have experience on setting up vpn site to site between branches with differnet internal network (for example: 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24)

  Waiting for your valuable response

  Hello

  Here are a few links on policy nat

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9950.shtml

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008046f31a.shtml#T10

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml

  Concerning

• question links to site 2 site VPN with authentication cert

  Currently we are accumulate tunnel site-2-site VPN with our client. Usually we use pre-shared key as authentication with other customers without any problems, but it must use authentication cert with her this time. But the question is that our CA is different from theirs. I tried a few times, but he failed. Is it someone please let me know that he must have the certificate issued by the same certification authority to create the VPN tunnel?

  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  You can read this document to get a simple example of setting up a VPN S2S using certificates on an ASA:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080aa5be1.shtml

  Basically the sides must have the same certification authority and If there is an intermediate certificate that must be installed also. The ASA 2 will generate a CSR (certificate access code request), now then PKI will create a certificate for both parties, commonly called "certificate of identity".

  Please pass a note and mark as he corrected the post helpful!

  David Castro,

  Kind regards

• Site to Site VPN. pick up DfltGrpPolicy instead of Tunnel-Group

  Hello

  Our ASA was set by a consultant some time ago to allow connectivity SSLVPN RSA backend. I am now trying to get a Site to Site VPN working but seem to get into a lot of difficulties. I get a load of the l2l VPN-related debugging messages which I believe is set up correctly. Here's what I think is of interest

  "January 24, 2009 12:13:01: % ASA-6-113009: AAA recovered in group policy by default (DfltGrpPolicy) to the user = x.x.x.x".

  The user specifies the IP address of the Cisco router remote that we try to get the VPN configuration.

  I have to admit that I haven't done a lot with the side things SSLVPN so this part of the config is out of my depth, that's why I post here.

  If anyone can help it would be really appreciated.

  Here are the relevant details (I can post more if there isn't enough). My question is, how do I get the l2l using the tunnel-group and not the default group policy?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  dynamic-access-policy-registration

  DfltAccessPolicy

  WebVPN

  list of URLS no

  SVC request no svc default

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server VPNAUTH

  AAA-server VPNAUTH *. *. *

  interval before new attempt-5

  timeout 3

  key *.

  AAA authentication enable LOCAL console

  AAA authentication http LOCAL console

  LOCAL AAA authentication serial console

  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication

  AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console

  LOCAL AAA authorization command

  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy

  value of DNS server! !. !. !

  VPN-idle-timeout no

  VPN-tunnel-Protocol webvpn

  enable IP-comp

  enable IPSec-udp

  field default value mondomaine.fr

  the address value vpnpool pools

  WebVPN

  enable http proxy

  SVC Dungeon - install any

  SVC keepalive 60

  SVC generate a new method ssl key

  SVC request no svc default

  disable ActiveX-relays

  disable file entry

  exploration of the disable files

  disable the input URL

  tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup webvpn-attributes

  message of rejection-RADIUS-

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  pre-shared-key *.

  tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes

  PAP Authentication

  ms-chap-v2 authentication

  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup

  address vpnpool pool

  authentication-server-group VPNAUTH

  tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup webvpn-attributes

  message of rejection-RADIUS-

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x

  pre-shared-key *.

  Wayne

  Do "sh run all tunnel-group" you should see the strategy of group associated with it.

  for example:

  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 General attributes

  no accounting server group

  Group Policy - by default-DfltGrpPolicy

  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  by the peer-id-validate req

  no chain

  no point of trust

  ISAKMP retry threshold 10 keepalive 2

  Let me know if it helps.

  See you soon,.

  Gilbert

• problem of site 2 site vpn

  Greetings. We have a site 2 site vpn 2 asa5510-based work. The two sites are accessible internel network hosts, but we are unable to access all the services (such as the TFTP or CA)? or even ping hosts in the remote site of our local asa5510 network. It seems that ASA attempts to send packets directly through the default gw, bypasing the vpn tunnel. Any help would be very appreciate.

  PS We checked the ACLs on both devices, so more than likely, this is not the problem.

  Hello

  Since you did not include public ip address of the external interface in the Crypto ACL, it's why he's not going in the tunnel.

  Add Crypto ACL a statement where qualify you this statement outside the public ip address of the interface source and mirror image in the remote device.

  HTH

  Sangaré

  Pls rate helpful messages