Smart object problems, AI to ch = pixelated

Similar Questions

• Display linked smart object problem?

  I was really kissing linked smart objects recently. However I found on a few occasions, there are cases where a linked smart object seems to strangely, and I see pixels rounded curiously - almost as if she started scaling the picture a bit.

  

  The smart object linked above is correct, but the one below (linked the same file) is rendered differently. Two smart objects have been placed with identical dimensions, any scaling that occur here. Whenever I for now, place this file in the PSD I have this display problem. Around him, my only way is by duplicating that rendered correctly.

  Has anyone else encountered this problem?

  I worked on it.

  Essentially, when you insert the linked smart object even if I was seized to display 100% width & height (by default, that it has been globally as the source PSD has a smaller width/height), I had to then move the smart object after setting width & height 100% in order to then render correctly.

• Smart object pixelation problems

  Hello

  How is it that some logos that I bring in Photoshop as smart air well while some other look pixelated? Is there anything I can do to improve it?

  Thank you!

  Select the smart object layer, starting a free transformation (don't change in reality the transformation), in the options bar turn anti-aliasing, then validate the transformation (again, without changing anything, but the anti-aliasing checkbox).

• convert to smart object resolution problem

  Hello

  I work for the video game UI and because of that, my photoshop documents always needs to have a resolution of 72 dpi.

  My current problem is that when I convert a few layers to a dynamic object by using the launch of "convert to smart object" menu, Photoshop always gives this new file a resolution of 300 dpi.

  It is very annoying and I don't find in the preferences a way to define a specific resolution of the dynamic object.

  Changing the resolution after the creation of the dynamic object is not a solution (it's a slow process, I need to repeat each time a new smart object is created and the smart object is expanded in the parent document)

  Create a new document with a specific resolution and drag it as a smart object to my parent document is also a slow process, that I can't use as my work files contains many of these intelligent objects.

  So, is there a solution, I'll be very happy to know.

  Thank you!

  Mr. picouli says:

  Hello

  I work for the video game UI and because of that, my photoshop documents always needs to have a resolution of 72 dpi.

  Why is that game and poster that matches are played do not follow the ppi. Billboards is manufactured with different PPI and none that I saw the card to have a resolution of 72 dpi. Why the 72 DPI is so important in your workflow?  Are you sure you all image files are recorded with a resolution of 72 dpi setting?   I think the number of pixels you have images and objects, it is what would be important for the games.

• Why not transform the work? I'm doing a simple resize a smart object, and I constantly have problems. do not transformation. I had this same problem on several images and I've just updated to the latest

  I had frequent problems trying to resize the smart objects - I am unable to use the transformation. I had this problem on several images. I had some success by restarting Photoshop CC and Windows, but this does not always solve the problem. Is this a known issue? It's really annoying. I had this problem before the last update, and it continued after the most recent update.

  Hi djdphotography

  • You also have the same result if you create a layer duplicate the layer of the same image?
  • Also be sure that you do not have the Quick Mask mode by mistake (press Q to turn it off before you select the transform tool)

  

  Useful article:-Photoshop help | Free transformations of images, forms and paths

  Concerning

  ~ Assani

• All my smart objects pixelated

  I am past all recently to a new job with access CC, so I barely started to scratch the surface after migrating to CS5. There are a lot of things, even simple tasks, I am not aware of. At work, I have the last Photoshop, but at home, I still run CS5. When you work in Photoshop/Illustrator, I always import the dynamic objects in my workflow. After opening a document Photoshop CC full of dynamic objects in CS5, all my smart objects became pixilated. It's pretty useless to me. I opened PS CS6 documents with smart objects before and was able to open them in PS CS5 with dynamic objects intact. I don't know why is this now different in CC? I'm supposed to save a particular way to avoid losing my smart objects?

  The new version can open existing files,

  While the older versions of CS5 could open new files created with CC, but some features will not be supported.

  try saving the file in psd

  with maximize compatibility check box selected

  Let us know if that helps.

• Problem opening of raw as a smart object

  After editing an image in camera raw, when I click Open image CS3 opens a dynamic object.  Is there a way to reset the default to open as a NEF file?

  Thank you, John

  Click on the Options of Worksflow link at the bottom of the window of the cab, and then uncheck the box open in Photoshop as smart objects. Click OK, and then click done.

• Smart objects - copy without referencing the Original SO?

  A question from me

  If I copy a raster layer several times for an animation to image, then it makes sense to do than the smart object layer.  What I do, but I'm missing something.  For example, there is a video going around on photo blogs today, a lady in charge by an elk, but missed the guy with the iPhone, so I quickly put together.

  

  The video has been radically challenged in the Department of pixel, so I made the Lady layer one OC and formulated a number of copies.  Same thing with the Elk (from a different source), where I used Puppet Warp to simulate a bucking motion.  In both cases, Free transforming the PW YES, or using copied, caused the original SO layer to reflect the changes.  Not good at all. And it's something that's happened to me before.

  Then a little later, Google I found this old threadand tried his advice to slide SO the layer to the new icon of layer instead of using Ctrl j.  But that's where it weird, because now I could use Ctrl j and PW as before and modify a copied SO layer without affecting the original.

  Someone has a good understanding of why my SOs don't always work in the same way for me?  I guess I should man to the top and RTFM, but I was using what I thought exactly the same workflow in different documents and get different behavior.

  Working with smart objects in Photoshop

  I don't see this problem in PS CC 2015 (Mac) with copy/duplicate methods. Are you sure that you not open the parent (SO) and the transformation (Puppet Warp or free transform) running on the child (content)?

  Application of puppets Warp to a smart object layer apply PW as a dynamic filter that is only attached to this layer (you will see in the layers), and if none of the other layers will be affected by PW. But if you run PW on duplicate content, clicking on a smart object to see the child record, then all layers will be affected.

  Looks like you know what you're doing, but the PW behavior as a dynamic filter is specifically designed for the layer that the smart filter is applied.

  Steve

• Objects vector smart object - file format

  What is the best file format to save a photoshop file that has a number of vector smart objects that will eventually print? File can be placed in illustrator or indesign prior to be expelled to the printer either as direct files or on the PDF.

  Danny is correct: smart objects are STILL pixelated in resolution of the PSD, regardless of the format that you save it in.

  If you want to print any dynamic objects with imported objects vector (illustrator?) to setter image max resolution, you must extract these objects in the PSD file and rebuild the design in Illustrator or InDesign.

  It means that the smart object in question, which opens in Illustrator, and then save the file as a file HAVE editing. Remove the smart object in the PSD in Photoshop, then save a new version. Note the exact dimensions and positions. Open the file in InDesign and rebuild the original.

  If the layer effects have been applied in Photoshop to a matter SO vector: no chance. You will need to generate layers separated in the best of cases, or begin to recreate the effects in Illustrator in the worst case scenario. Or a combination of both.

  Vector shapes and the Type that were generated in Photoshop with effects applied to him may be problematic if the resolution of the PSD is insufficient. However, the outline remains vector while recording in Photoshop PDF format. Import the PDF into InDesign retains the sharp vector contour. Just make sure that the native resolution of the Photoshop document is high enough to produce a strong impression for effects (which will be pixels).

  The problem is that a lot of designers decided to convert their photoshop vector shapes and text in smart objects - and this will rasterize the result, no matter what. And there is no easy way to "unsmart" a dynamic object.

  A method (far from perfect) is:

  • Double-click the smart object to open it in a new window
  • Select all the layers in the .psb (dynamic object) that opens
  • Choose Layer > Group the menu
  • Hold down the SHIFT key and drag the window of smart objects to your original document with the move tool window.
  • Drag the icon fx the dynamic object for the new group of layers layer you just drag over
  • Remove the smart object layer.

  The only caveats to this method are scale and positioning. You may have to reposition some groups according to their interaction with the edges of the original document. And if you scale the smart object layer, you may need to scale of the group as well.

  Here is a script that automates some of this: http://blog.kam88.com/en/expanding-smart-objects-script.html

  This will ONLY work with SOs that were created in Photoshop.

  Dynamic objects are bothersome creatures indeed. Much too easy for designers unknowing to destroy the intent of vectors and difficult and potentially very tedious to undo in a news environment.

  The problem is that a lot of users tend to abuse of Photoshop as a request to print 'all-in-one' layout

• If I'm smart object then rasterize it then smart new ojbects

  Hello

  I hope you are all good. I wonder that something with the smart object in photoshop. So if I do a random object layer intelligent then rasterize it (and make some changes may be beush or a few small changes) then turn to smart object again. I'll lose any resolution or size problems?

  If you have an information about it pls know me.

  Nice day!

  You do not have either of these problems when working with dynamic objects. If you rasterize the smart object and then change the size of resolution or image via the size of the Image, you will have the same results as you normally would. Switch to smart objects by pixelation will change all that.

  Chris

• Try to paste from Illustrator as a smart object

  Is there a trick to paste an image vector pixelated from Illustrator into Photoshop as a smart object and not introduce a bunch of smoothing that wasn't in the original file? My images are perfectly aligned with the pixel grid in Illustrator, and displays correctly rasterizes preview.

  This page is useful to deal with vector shape layers, but the techniques he talks do not work for dynamic objects. Strangely, he says that it is not a problem with smart objects, but I do.

  Here's an example of what I'm talking about: a simple image of pixel of 13 x 13 in turn shit in Photoshop Illustrator when pasted as a smart object (I know not a picture that is as simple as it could be pasted as a shape layer, but the I work with real images are much more complex and cannot be pasted in the form of simple shape layers).

  

  I'm using Photoshop CS4.

  > How to use these tools documentation could be improved so that when someone tries to do what wants to do the OP above, it can really accomplish its purpose?

  I'm not sure. It seems to be expecting behavior that should not. So I don't know what he thinks is happening, or what part it misunderstands.  I can document how the mathematics and applications work, but not all average people incorrectly assume that they work.

  Nod to the pixel grid option vector will manage the outline of the shape-, but maybe inside aliasees according to the position and size of the shape as well as the definition of the original form of vector.  Most of the time, vectors do not align with the pixel grid, but we can force the outside edges to align. Inside edges usually cannot be aligned with limits of pixels without deforming the wrong form (in the case where it is possible at all).

• vector smart object in photoshop

  I swear im not a fool, but here I am with another problem...

  OK im with illustrator, but not good at all with photoshop.

  I'm illy card and you want to put in photoshop to add the final texture.

  It's the standard business card size, effect of mosaic type with type. not very complicated.

  I have copy and place it in photoshop as a smart object vector and it comes out pixelated beyond belief.

  I rechecked that anti-aliasing and AICB/PDF are checked on. If I save it as PNG file it seems to work, but that seems like an unnecessary step...

  I use Illy CS5 photoshop CS4, if that matters.

  any ideas?

  You can I think to score your own answer as the answer, so people will notice the thread.

• File > Place, but not as a smart object?

  You can file > Place and Image without a smart object layer?

  Leaving as dynamic object is usually the way to go, but if for some reason you won't a dynamic object you can always use: layer: pixelation: Smart Object.

  A problem with the dynamic vector objects is that vector data does not appear in the output of Photoshop. Which means that if a document has vector smart objects and you save as PDF, the SO ends as pixels in the output PDF (check by opening the PDF with Acrobat and zoom)

  You don't have the ability to copy vector data, and then paste as paths or shape layers. It is wrought with complications, but it can give the output vector.

• Change of image when converting to smart object

  Well, that's a new one on me.

  I have a simple image with a layer and layers of setting three on top.

  Mixer - with blue layer refused to 0%

  Posterize - 3 levels

  Black and white - no changes to the default values

  

  It gives me a black and white posterized picture-as I expect. All blending modes are normal and without layer effects are applied and there is no other layers on.

  

  However, when I change to a dynamic object - level poster borders move (see example cut the corner of the picture below)

  

  If I open the smart object - everything is as before, if I close (save the object) and discovers the smart object in the main image, change the posterization.

  I work in 16-bit and image and the dynamic object are in Adobe RGB. I get the same effect with the GPU acceleration on or off

  I am at a loss to explain why I see a change while creating a dynamic object.

  Dave

  Just to be sure: to view > actual Pixels?

• copy the smart object, paste in the new doc is smarter

  Here's the relevant part:

  app.activeDocument = backArt;
  var backDesign = backArt.activeLayer;
  backDesign.copy();
  app.activeDocument = backTemp;
  app.activeDocument.paste();
  

  If the layer I copy a dynamic object, it is no longer when stuck.  Is it possible to change this option or if not actually copy paste a layer which is a smart object?

  Both pis.  I was able to solve the problem using two copies instead of copy.