Soft proofing and color profile

Similar Questions

• Soft Proofing and adjustment brush / Spot removal problems

  Hello

  Since the last update (at least I think) to 6.5 that I have a problem when soft proofing is turned on. In particular, the adjustment brush and the brush of spotting does not work smoothly. The first problem is that when you try to make smaller or larger brush (keyboard and Tablet) the brush shows the size have immediately brush outside the window or click on the image to see the size of the brush (brush of detachment and adjustment) and the cash withdrawal is very slow and if I want to spend the part I want to remove to make it better appearance it does not update immediately when moving. Also when using either the computer fans brush starts to kick in and work hard. Tried two GPUs and extinguish the same result. but as I turn soon soft proofing off the coast of the brushes as planned work and also the fans to stay out of

  so if someone has problems with these two brushes you might want to look into the option to see if Proofing is enabled

  I have not noticed this. However, I usually do all my withdrawal in cash without proofing turned on. Normally, the only thing I do when the soft proofing is set things like saturation, lights and shadows. Things that affect the overall appearance of printing based on the book that I use. What are the specifications of your computer? OS, RAM, etc.

• Softproof and color profiles

  Not all of my correct installed color profiles are available in the menu "Profile" softproof in the develop module. Why not? And how can I change this?

  Thank you.

  Those who are not?  Profiles CMYK will not be displayed, for example.

• Relationship of Bit depth and color profile

  Can someone explain what the relationship between the color of a file profile and he has little depth, if there is a relationship?

  It is not a. Bit depth tells you how many nuances a pixel can have (256 shades of gray in an image in 8-bit grayscale) while the color profile tell you how this pixel looks really (he transforms a number like 255/0/0 in a specific shade of red in the case of sRGB)

  Bit depth:

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/CS/using/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-73daa.h tml

  Models of color, spaces, and modes:

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/CS/using/WSC5BC9589-872F-4792-A07D-47388F117A79a.htm l

• I want that all my color settings set to sRGB so that when I print from my professional lab colors will match my screen (I'm calibrated). When I hit save under and see that there is a check box to embed the Adobe 1998 color profile in the menu, but I want

  When I hit Save as menu drop-down is checked to integrate adobe 1998 color profile and I want it to be srgb. Where can I change so that it is srgb and the rest in this way? My impressions of my professional lab and come back cast, flat and dark green or blue for them. My monitor is calibrated according to me its because somewhere I have adobe 1998 selected and color profiles are the translation not properly so I need everything to be srgb. I am also shooting srgb. Help, please!

  If you think that your calibration profile is disabled, follow these steps:

  

• Bluescreen when the soft proofing

  I just started to have the blue screen with an X, developing mode, while the soft proofing and seeking the warnings of the range. Proofing also no longer works (image remains the same). Recently made "Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update" and recently upgraded to El Capitan, and this issue seems to be passed eventually. Since having the problem, I've just updated to the latest version of LR, nothing helps. With the help of iMac (mid-2010) with a lot of memory... everything worked fine last week. Here is the system of information displayed on the performance tab in the preferences of LR:

  

  Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

  Sorry for my delay... Thank you for your response. I always have, I could not proofing to work even though he seems to have the right icc profile listed. In fact, the profiles were more where they should be in the ColorSync folder. Reinstalled them, and everything is good to go. GPU is activated and not blue X.

• [LR 5] Soft Proofing - Gamut Warning monitor vary with the profile of the printer?

  Hello

  There is something that I do not understand when you use the function of gentle fermentation in LR.

  The monitor Gamut Warning feature (top left icon of the histogram when Proofing is enabled) is supposed to show us what colors in the image can be reproduced on the screen. Right? If I understand correctly, the warning is calculated by comparing the current image (virtualized by LR in the Melissa RGB color space) to the display range (read active calibration profile).

  Then why LR different show "out of gamut" areas for display when I change the profile of the printer selected when using soft proofing? It's not logical for me.

  I missed something?

  Thanks in advance.

  Indeed, they are vague on this issue. My thinking on the subject comes to converse with people from Adobe here and elsewhere, as I'm sure that I'vce has discussed this issue on the forum before. As far as I know the caution monitor is supposed to be calculated after the conversion to the profile of the printer so that you get an idea if the soft resistant color is displayed accurately. This must be the correct behavior as waterproofing can really take a color either in or out of the monitor range. I'm not 100% sure on it though, but definitely, he explains how he behaves.

  Also, if you calibrate your screen and write a display icc v4 profile, the situation changes once again as today the display profile can actually contain a perceptual rendering intent, making it even less accurate and the assumption of simple linear conversions one-to-one between color spaces is not valid. Some calibration software packages do however, but there are a few exceptions.

  If you want to know if your image is outside the display profile, you can indeed deceive the test to allow you to select a display as the printer proofing profile profile. In principle, you can select a standard workspace such as prophotoRGB it and get results that make sense. But you certainly don't want to have a random printer profile chosen for the reasons cited above. I guess they could add some tricks to detect that you have selected the profile of the current view and not one profile of another to randomly display and then collapse the interface, but it's a case of edge I doubt Adobe would give priority to this. It works very well so simply, you realize that you have selected your profile screen like the printer proof profile.

• Convert to profile & Soft Proofing.

  Hello

  My apologies if this has been requested and replied. Some responses on proofing looked on the forums has helped, but not hit the nail on the head.

  I am grateful for the ideas, instructions, pointers.

  I. According to the instructions of the printer that prints my work, I have converted my image profiles to Dot Gain 20%. I want to assure you that I see on my screen will have a) be a tight that she (woman, the print job) will see on his screen. and (b) give me an idea of how the print job and the printer (Espson stylist Pro 4800) will interpret. It is logical to me that I should change my format of test for Dot Gain 20%, no?  Have I not this wrong?

  II. I also need to do a series of JPEG files which will be visible on a variety of screens, each with a different brand and calibration. These JPEG files should be as convincing a match to print as possible, with compensation, of course, carried out for the paper, ink, etc. The game should be close. Is there a standard for ever which will allow me to see what is likely to appear on a given screen. An order, I know. I was wondering if I should just inform viewers to display JPEG images with their monitors, assign a certain color profile - or if I should send them a monitor profile as well as JPEG files.

  Thank once again for ideas.

  Best-

  Hardware: iMac 27 "; Native Gamma 2.2. CS6.

  A little guide:

  You will need a valid of monitor profile (MP) and a printer profile (PP) for

  Epson 4800 for a printing (ink, paper, well-defined resolution process

  and much more).

  If your impression people do not have a profile, and then not to print from there.

  A PP contains everything about the Dot Gain.

  Let the images in sRGB (sRGB workspace)

  Edit by PhS until it looks nice

  In the event, choose your PP

  Rendering Intent Relative Colorimetry, Black Point Compensation

  Observe the changes of the image, Soft Proof on / off

  Failure to comply with the warning range, using a color of alarm

  If the changes are strong or / and if the Gamut Warning zones are large

  (not only highlights or some leaves on the trees), then change your image.

  This can be explained by simple means.

  If the image looks nice and save with sRGB embedded profile

  and leave it to print, using exactly the defined printer process previously.

  Test is done by software, here Photoshop, for simulated hardware.

  which is entirely defined by the PP.

  sRGB is a de facto standard for the Web.

  If your images are in a colorful way, then it could be recommended

  working entirely in AdobeRGB (1998) = ARGB.

  Image in aRGB, work space ARGB.

  You can do this after the clarification of this issue with the impression people. Of course

  the aRGB profile must be incorporated, but even in this case, there is a good chance

  the people of print is not familiar with profiles and assumes sRGB as

  Profile of the source.

  Putting, you would need two versions - one for printing, one for the Web.

  Cordially - Gernot Hoffmann

• Where Soft Proofing adjustable and specific documents?

  Hello

  I don't seem to find where the parameters can be changed / adjusted.

  Thank you

  Raphael

  With Soft Proofing on (1) click on the drop down profile menu (2). If you don't see the desired profile choose 'other' and all the profiles that you have available will be listed (3).

  

• color for web and print profiles

  Hello

  I'm editing photos from my digital SLR. They were shot as jpg in Adobe RGB. I'm editing photos for both web and print right now and I was wondering if there is a way to do so that I would be able to change for both at the same time in the process of Photoshop.

  Here are the details for what I usually do:

  For printing, I would work in AdobeRGB photos while the check option has the working CMYK value (usually SWOP, depending on which printer I use). Then I would flatten the work, resize and sharpen and change the color to CMYK mode, save as TIFF.

  For the web, I used to edit while RGB color settings are defined in sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 and verification is set to RGB monitor. I flattened, resize and sharpen and save for Web.

  Is it possible that I can edit a single photo (shot in Adobe RGB) so that they can be used for BOTH print and web? I know CMYK or RGB would mean they would end in search of different end, but is be possible that I can have a single Photoshop file for the photo and go through the steps needed to make it ready for printing and for the web... or because of the color profiles and linguistic verification options , there is nothing I can do but to edit each photo twice?

  Thanks in advance to anyone who might be able to help.

  First of all I suggest you just started shooting RAW not Jpeg.

  then personally I work in AdobeRGB. I place my PSD AdobeRGB in ID and the CMYK conversion is done when I do my PDF. for web work I convert to sRGB when I use save for Web. Do not use your monitor profile color proof for the web like that you have the correct monitor profile.

• U2413 - factory Color Calibration and ICC profiles

  Hi, I just bought a U2413. I need for photography. There is nothing on profiles ICC U2413 DELL that was installed with the software in the documentation. And please note that I have not (yet!) a calibrator. I need to configure the best without calibrator... using the factory calibration.

  I hope you can make it clear, to me, how it works.

  The monitor has different MODES BUILT-IN, such as:
  -Color space sRGB
  -Color space ARGB
  -Standard
  -Game, etc.

  Which mode is the one that has been calibrated at the factory?
  What mode should I use in order to have the results of color?
  I see that there is no DELL U2413 color profile, D6500, which is associated with the monitor (I can see it in the control panel). I think it is good to have this setting. Can you please confirm?

  Do I set up the U2313 DELL ICC profile also to programs like Canon Digital Photo Professional, or as long as it is in Windows, it is not necessary? [Item 3 of this screenshot]. I see that if I put profile DELL in Canon DPP the colors of the photos appear much colder.

  Thank you

  If you do not have access to an i1DisplayPro/Color munki display a yo do not have the possibility to calibrate (not even in GPU with the munki:)

  factory calibrated
  -sRGB: 50 50 brightness contrast. You can use standard sRGB.icm, once lower you it up to 120cd/m (20-25% brightness) you will lose the white point calibration.

  -AdobeRGB: contrast 50 50 brightness. You can use standard AdobeRGB1998.icm (complatible or ones like Clay1998.icm), once lower you it up to 120cd/m (20-25% brightness) you will lose the white point calibration but less than sRGB. For color management programs and without perhaps a colorimeter its your safest choice, do not forget to assign and activate an Adobe1998.icm/Clay1998.icm in Control Panel of Windows to your monitor while you're in this preset OSDdevice.

  The other preset OSD are not calibrated at the factory.

  -standard is delivered with the native range (as described in U2413.icm of pilots) and native white (whie 6700-7000K with a strong green tint)

  -Custom is delivered with the native range (as described in U2413.icm of pilots) and native white (whie 6700-7000K with a strong green tint), but you have access to the parameters of "custom colors". 20-25% brightness, contrast 50%, and R = 100, G = 91 = 97 peut give you near D65 white and 2.26 "grow" gamma (cose to 2.2 or sRGB but I guess it comes with a ramp to a same gray except calibrated). Try these setings and activate U2413.icm in this preset custom of the OSD.

  And get an i1DisplayPro, you really need.

  Canon DPP regarding:

  2 refers to the "default" image profile
  3 to view the profile (so the DPP can distort the RGB values in the image to represent this color in what that is the range to your screen). Once you set a dile icm as 'default' in the control panel-> color management-> your device it shoud check the option "use operating system settings" (I think, I don't have any owm a canon camera)
  5 a your printer profile, a profile for each combination of inkjet paper
  6. keep this, perceptual is generally more 'alive' than the actual image
  7 I think takes forever with Canon programs (but I am not a canon camera, so I have not tried their meaning), keep the same as 6

• Between cc and cs6 indesign color profile

  Hi all

  I use indesign cc and cs6 in Windows 7 os based on the customer's requirement. When I change a color profile in indesign cs6 reflecting in indesign cc and vice versa. Is it possible to keep them unique?

  The only solution is to have several documents, each embodying the color settings you want, but otherwise identical.

  -Dov

• created the color profile loading

  Hello

  I had this problem before.

  I work with Imac end 2015 retina 4K and the operating system's EL Capitan.

  Photoshop CC 2015-5

  I created a new profile of color with a spyder 2 (I ordered a new color Munky, incidentally)

  and the software I used was Displaycal 5.

  When I open a file with overview of the Mac, the colors and the contrast is perfect.

  When I open the same file with the Adobe Bridge or Photoshop CC 2015 products

  the contrast is far from bright and the colors are not correct.

  Now, I guess to see the new file created color in bridge color settings according to a tutorial.

  But right now, I don't see the new color profile.

  In the workspaces from photoshop, I see the profile, but no matter what I do the photo are much to high heat.

  In the past with my old Mac and earlier versions of photoshop, I never had this problem.

  The colors and contrast have been even the glimpse of the I mac.

  I really hope you can help me.

  Thank you very much

  Richard

  View > proof > Monitor RGB turns off the whole display color management chain. It's his goal (insofar as it is never desirable). In short, turn off and leave it off.

  Different color-managed applications display differently, there is a problem with the display profile. All color management applications should display always the same, regardless of the profile/the document workspace. That is the question to have a color display managed pipeline.

  Redo the whole process, make sure you that have all the settings as you wish. I have not used Dispcal/Argyll in quite awhile, but it is a fairly large and complex software piece.

  A small difference between the apps that are color management and not, is normal and expected. What is the size that the difference is, depends on the characteristics of the screen in question.

  That said, the sensor Spyder 2 useless next with modern LED and wide range of displays, and despite this, the overall accuracy was not very good at first. So you can wait until you get the new sensor.

• What sRGB profile to use (HP sRGB profile ICC PCBS, ICCnoBPC and no profile)?

  Hello world

  Can I ask something from you guys? I have a question to which no one can seem to answer.

  I don't know which is the best profile to use - the sRGB profile HP, ICC sRGB PCBS, the sRGB ICC with no PCBS, or no profile (just marked as sRGB colorspace).

  They are all sRGB_IEC61966-2, but the sRGB HP who is originally from older versions of CS (and perhaps newer?) does not specify if it's PCBS or nonBPC.

  I noted several things (and I know little about color profiles, so please excuse my ignorance):

  (1) Firefox displays all profiles in the same way, except noBPC is shown with lighter blacks

  (2) adobe seems to represent the PCBS sRGB and sRGB HP in the same way?

  (3) some people suggest to use no profile, marking just the metadata for say sRGB

  (4) the site of the ICC said that color profiles more V2 on the www are black-scaled; other sites seem to say that it is the opposite: that PCBS is something new for most of the people who save sRGB V2...

  (5) PCBS = black scaling.

  Help ! I am completely at a loss for what is the way most future-proof to do. Every road seems to be a disadvantage.

  Any help would be great

  Tod

  todstanlervan wrote:

  Hi gener7

  I see. Can I ask, however, if this is your profile that you use in your editions?

  This is a display of the profile sRGB HP EXIFTool.

  Really curious to know if we actually use the same file.

  Part of me wonders if that my installation of photoshop has the HP sRGB is because maybe I installed it by accident long ago; or maybe it's really the same thing.

  See you soon

  It is the export of the Exiftool GUI on my sRGB file text file. Hope that helps

  -File-
  File name: sRGB Color Space Profile.icm
  Directory:.
  File size: 3.1 kB
  FileModifyDate: 2009:06:10 14:28:33 - 07:00
  FilePermissions: rw-rw-rw -.
  FileType: ICC
  MIME type: application/vnd.iccprofile
  -ICC_Profile-
  ProfileCMMType: Lino
  ProfileVersion: 2.1.0
  ProfileClass: Profile of display device
  ColorSpaceData: RGB
  ProfileConnectionSpace: XYZ
  ProfileDateTime: 1998:02:09 06:49
  ProfileFileSignature: Association
  PrimaryPlatform: Microsoft Corporation
  CMMFlags: Non-integrated, independent
  Photo: IEC
  DeviceModel: sRGB
  DeviceAttributes: Opaque, bright, positive, color
  RenderingIntent: perception
  ConnectionSpaceIlluminant: 0.9642 1 0.82491
  ProfileCreator: HP
  ProfileID: 0
  ProfileCopyright: Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company
  ProfileDescription: sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1
  MediaWhitePoint: 0.95045 1 1.08905
  MediaBlackPoint: 0 0 0
  RedMatrixColumn: 0.43607 0,22249 0.01392
  GreenMatrixColumn: 0.38515 0.09708 0,71687
  BlueMatrixColumn: 0.14307 0,06061 0.7141
  DeviceMfgDesc: IEC http://www.iec.ch
  DeviceModelDesc: Space of RGB color by default of IEC 61966 - 2.1 - sRGB
  ViewingCondDesc: Reference look at a Condition in IEC61966 - 2.1
  ViewingCondIlluminant: 19.6445 20,3718 16.8089
  ViewingCondSurround: 3.92889 4,07439 3.36179
  ViewingCondIlluminantType: D50
  Luminance: 76.03647 80 87.12462
  MeasurementObserver: CIE 1931
  MeasurementBacking: 0 0 0
  MeasurementGeometry: Unknown (0)
  MeasurementFlare: 0.999%
  MeasurementIlluminant: D65
  Technology: Tube CRT screen
  RedTRC: (data binary 2060 bytes, use option b to extract)
  GreenTRC: (data binary 2060 bytes, use option b to extract)
  BlueTRC: (data binary 2060 bytes, use option b to extract)

• Use of on Satellite U300 ICM color profiles

  I've got U - 300 Satellite + Win XP. I use specially generated IMAGE color profile to my screen using Spider. I downloaded this addon rom Web sites allowing me to use the product. ICM file and it works.

  However, I have to turn it on whenever my computer is restarted because graphics cards drivers not support color profiles and after each reboot, the colors are back, which are defined in the graphics drivers.

  Is there a way to define this profile once and for all, so I don't have to go to the control panel whenever I turn on my machine? Thanks for help.

  Personally I t have experience using these profiles of ice color, but I found this Microsoft page.
  http://www.Microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/ProPhoto/ColorControl.mspx

  http://www.Microsoft.com/whdc/device/display/color/default.mspx

  But perhaps entirely graphic driver doesn t support this profiles of ice and, therefore, you have always change it in the control panel.
  Perhaps an update of the graphics card driver could help. But this is only a suggestion.