SonicWall NSA 220 slow flow

Similar Questions

• Install SSL SonicWall NSA 220

  Hello I need know if possible to install SSL from comodo or symantec. I have a sonicwall NSA 220.

  thnks for help.

  Install an SSL certificate. Yes, it is possible. By submitting the CSR make sure you select SSL/Apache for the creation of the certificate.

  #Iwork4DELL

• VPN at the request of iOS to the NSA 220

  Can I connect an iPhone or an iPad to a SonicWall NSA 220 with SSL VPN on demand and detection of trusted network?

  Read the Notes version and Guides on the link below, I think I won't be able to do so in part because the NSA 220 does not support the authentication of the client certificate, and these features are only supported on devices Dell SonicWALL E-Class SRA.

  support.Software.Dell.com/.../Release-Notes-guides

  I would like to know if it will work before you buy the 220 of the NSA.  Or to add this support for client certificate authentication, SSL VPN on demand and detection of Web of trust in a future release?

  Thank you

  Hi Barret.

  Currently, the NSA does not support the authentication of the client certificate and which is required for the VPN feature at the request of iOS.  Currently iOS VPN on demand is supported for connections to the devices Dell SonicWALL E-Class SRA and SMB SRA.  There are more details and captures screen in the Mobile Connect for iOS 3.1 User Guide: https://support.software.dell.com/download/downloads?id=5642876

  It will be finally supported by the line of product of NSA as well but I have no available for this chronology.

• EA6900 Super slow flow

  I have an EA6900 put in place for the routing functions on a Virgin Media 120Mbps cable connection.  I see a very slow flow on the Linksys router, and after looking for obvious causes, I am stumpted.

  The EA6900 is connected to Virgin Media "Superhub" which is on the modem mode.  In this configuration, a single peripheral cable with a gigabit ethernet card can see download speeds autour 9Mbps.  However, when a Superhb in router mode switch and connect a device directly to it, jump to 100 Mbit/s download speeds.

  I tried several different network between the modem and the EA6900 cables, but the results are the same.  I was also in touch with Virgin Media, who said that there is no problem with the upstream connection.

  He suggests that the cause is something to do with the EA6900.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  Ben

  Disable media Prioritizaion or leave it turned on and ensure that you set the speed of bandwidth downstream to 120000 in advanced settings. Let us know if that helps.

• ASA5510 Migration of SonicWall NSA 2400 VPN/GW router

  Hello

  I'll need to migrate 1 router VPN/GW SonicWall NSA 2400 x to 2 x ASA5510 (need SSL - VPN, detection/prevention of Intrusion, Virus, Malware protection similar) behind 2 x 2921 Cisco ISR routers. He comes to office relocation and redesign of the network.

  Suggestions or comments? It's very appreciated.

  BTW:

  1. difference between ASA5510 and ASA5520?
  2. it's a good idea to use the Juniper VPN instead of ASA5510/20 box?

  Thank you

  Dengming

  Hi Dengming,

  See the data sheets for Cisco ASA 5510 and 5520. You will find all the specs of the device and there is a feature to compare devices as well.

  See you soon,.

  Nash.

• SonicWALL NSA, using VPN client overall comments to reach network of internal resources

  Hello

  I have problems performing Global VPN client to work when you connect to our internal network of comments in order to reach our internal LAN Server in order to reach internal resources in a safe manner. I'm not sure what could the settings were necessary in the Sonicwall to achieve?

  Our installation is based on the NSA 3600 and I installed a WLAN area in the sonicwall to enable clients to connect to the internet. Traffic in the WLAN area to our internal LAN Server is denied. However, some users would like to be able to use the wireless network in order to achieve internal resources and for that I want to use the Global VPN client. It is even possible to use of an internal network from the point of view Sonicwalls Global VPN client?

  The use of the outside Global VPN client works very well

  Any help is greatly appreciated and if more detailed configuration information are necessary, I'll happily give you that.

  Thank you

  Hi Ben,

  No I didn't at first, but your answers have would lead me in the right direction, hopefully. I realized that I could create a custom GroupVPN by going to the settings of the interface to the interface that is the war in the Gulf to my wireless network.

  return to results

  Thank you

  Cree

• x 220 slow network performance

  I have a x 220 windows 7 32 bit and with cable and wireless I get extremely slow performance. The chip is an Intel 81579LM and copy files over the network via the cable network for example I get only 800 Kbps. If I plug my desktop PC into the same switch I get something much faster. So the problem is definitely on the 220 x. I tried various driver updates, but nothing seems to fix. I ran perfmon and CPU and disk read/write queues are not a problem. Where should I go from here?

  Roger

  roger456 wrote:

  If I plug my desktop PC into the same switch I get something much faster

  .

  You use the same Ethernet cable between the device and the same port on the switch for the two tests?

  If this is not the case, try to do the test with the help of two Ethernet cables between the devices and the same port of the switch... This would pretty quickly sort if you have an Ethernet wiring related issue - it's pretty common root cause of the problem you describe.

  See you soon,.

  Bill

• SonicWALL NSA 3600 6.2.2.1 - 14n and Sonicwall Mobile Connect for MAC DNS problems

  Hello

  I wonder if anyone has seen this problem. I just upgraded my NSA3600 to version 6.2.0 to 6.2.2.1 - 14n and now none of my MAC OS x clients that use the Sonicwal Mobile Connect application has no DNS. You can test by IP and use NSLOOKUP to find the records dns, but if you try to ping or access what either by its name it does not work.

  Everything worked perfectly before the upgrade to 6.2.2.1

  Thank you for this information, but it was not useful in this case because everything worked until I upgraded from 6.2.0 to 6.2.2.

  I just got got off the phone with Sonicwall support and there is a bug in the 6.2.2.1 - 14n and they gave me with a firmware fix. version 6.2.2.1 - 14n-HF156864-1n and everything is in working order.

• Slow flow on MPLS VPN WAN

  Anyone have any ideas why a portion of the traffic is slow as it passes through a VPN MPLS WAN. My FTP copies are fast but copy all windows or windows file transfers are slow. Copies of windows are about three times slower as the FTP transfers. Can be optimized on routers or switches?

  Hello

  Thus, all transfers are done with CIFS are slow and other then CIFS are ok?

  All transfers are between XP/7 and servers (before 2008)?

  Please take a look at http://bit.ly/rkh9IM

  CIFS (or SMB) prior to the 2008 version is slow by definition as it can not cope with very good latency. Other protocols such as HTTP and FTP run much smoother.

  When you run Server 2008 (or better) combination with Windows Vista (or better) should solve some of your problems as it can using SMBv2.

  What actual speed is your order on the MPLS and what is the maximum transfer reached between server and workstation?

  Best regards, G.

• Slow flow on TIV

  Recently, I have configured a VTI interface between two 2921 routers.  The link between the two routers is 100 MB, but the tunnel does not seem to be able to spend a lot more traffic.  I noticed a few differences between the MTU and bandwidth in the Tunnel interface compared to the physical interface.  Is it normal for a VTI?

  Tunnel1 is up, line protocol is up

  Material is Tunnel

  The Internet address is 192.168.193.127/31

  MTU 17862 bytes, BW 100 Kbps, DLY 50000 usec,

  reliability 255/255, txload 43/255, rxload 99/255

  Encapsulation TUNNEL, loopback not set

  KeepAlive not set

  Tunnel source 1 *. ***. ***. 1, destination 1 *. ***. ***. 2

  Transport/Protocol of IP/IPSEC tunnel

  TTL 255 tunnel

  Tunnel transport MTU 1422 bytes

  Tunnel of transmission bandwidth 8000 (Kbps)

  Tunnel to receive 8000 (Kbps) bandwidth

  Tunnel of protection through IPSec (profile "RD_VTI")

  Last entry 4w2d, exit 4w6d, blocking exit ever

  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 4w2d

  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 176

  Strategy of queues: fifo

  Output queue: 0/0 (size/max)

  30 second entry rate 123000 bps, 157 packets/s

  exit rate of 30 seconds 1994000 bps, 233 packets/s

  836701737 package, 47577560492 bytes, 0 no buffer entry

  Received 0 emissions (0 of IP multicasts)

  0 Runts, 0 giants, 0 shifters

  errors entry 0, 0 CRC, overgrown plot of 0, 0, 0 ignored, 0 abort

  1506226971 packets output, 1926214877370 bytes, 0 underruns

  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 resets interface

  unknown protocol 0 drops

  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 30 second entry rate 123000 bps, 157 packets/sec

  Disclaimer

  The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose.  Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.

  RESPONSIBILITY

  Any author will be responsible for any damage that it (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

  Poster

  Without a thorough analysis, your adjust-mss seems too small; IP MTU minus 40 is the commune.

  Benefits activation of PMTUD on the tunnel interface (see my previous Cisco white paper reference).

  So, what does the mower to the shape of the 95% to?  Why are shape you?

• Flow of packets through NSA series...?

  I searched the internet for a document taking all the flow of packages through Sonicwall NSA from the moment of penetration to abandon the vehicle, I have not found... anybody has an idea

  I fear that such information may be confidential.

• How to block Facebook for specific users by IP in NSA 4600 Sonicwall

  Hello

  I want to block facebook and youtube for some users in network using the IP of the user's computer or a MAC and allow other remaining users access facebook normally in Dell Sonicwall NSA 4600.

  Kindly guide me how it is possible in the firewall settings. Thank you

  Osama Aftab.

  You must configure the App control rules advance for block & FB access to specific users.

  Following article will give you heads upward.

  It is said in this article during the configurations block: activate & user/group of users Include: all THE (IE block FB for all users). You can use groups to exclude the user to authorize access to few IPs/users.

  

• Reference Dell sonicwall Email security 3300

  Hi all

  I need help to deploy my camera to 3300 of e-mail on the network security...

  first of all, I'll choose al to the server mode... and put it on the DMZ network... on the LAN will be my directory server and active Messaging... the bridge is two sonicwall NSA 5600 in HA.

  1. in order to inbound traffic, I'm going to on my policy of sonicwall for WAN DMZ

  2. from the DMZ to the local network, which is necessary for the network to the DMZ (e-mail Português) will communicate with LAN (Server Messaging (exchange) or AD)? What kind of strategy and ports need to be open

  your help will be appreciated :)

  Sorry for the late reply.

  There are many things to consider and the 3 KB here should cover all the questions you have.

  Each service that you mentioned has its own ports to be used.

  

  

  

• VPN from Site to Site of 2600 NSA does not work after upgrade to 6.2.0.1/6.2.2.0 6.2.0.0 SonicOS

  Site to Site VPN using policy based or VPN type road works very well in NSA 2600 with SonicOS Enhanced 6.2.0.0 - 20n. However, in order to correct the poodle attacks on SSLv3, we improve our SonicOS to 6.2.0.1 - 24n and this make the VPN does not. We tried SonicOS 6.2.2.0 - 7n with the same result. However, the VPN works remotely locally, but not the reverse, i.e. one meaning outside of the local network. Here are the details of the VPN deployment:

  Distance: NetScreen SSG-5 or GSU - 320 M

  Local: SonicWall NSA-2600

  Policy type: Tunnel Interface

  Auth. method: IKE using preshared Secret

  IKE Phase 1 proposal: Main Mode, group 2, 3DES, SHA1

  Proposal of IPSec Phase 2: ESP 3DES SHA1

  Please advice if it is linked to the SSLv3 disabled on Ipsec or any setting that we can make the VPN works on SonicOS after 6.2.0.1, again thank you!

  After reading the Release Notes for Early Release SonicOS 6.2.2.0 - 12n NSA-2600, we have solved the problem easily. Here's the important part:

  IMPORTANT: SonicOS 6.2.2.0 includes a design change added in recent versions for the treatment of the traffic via the Interfaces of the VPN Tunnel. By default, NAT policies are now applied to this traffic. In SonicOS 6.2.0.0 and SonicOS 6.1.1.9 and 6.1.1.x earlier, traffic on the Interfaces of the VPN Tunnel was exempt from policies NAT. Transition one of these earlier versions to 6.2.2.0 may require configuration changes.

  In fact, the truth is since 6.2.0.1, they already have policies NAT for the Interfaces of the VPN Tunnel. So the solution, regardless of usage 6.2.0.1 or 6.2.2.0, is just to write your policy NAT there is source and services NAT to network strategy involved VPN Tunnel Interface, that will be fine. To be simple, just

  Original of the CBC	Definition of the CBC	Original dest	Definition of dest	SVC Original	Definition of SVC
  Any	Source language	Remote VPN network	Source language	Any	Source language

• VPN tunnel cascade w / SW NSA FWs

  

  Hello

  I have questions about VPN cascading between 3 firewall SonicWALL NSA. Let me explain my situation and what I want to achieve.

  As shown in the diagram above, I have 3 branches connected to the Internet, which advanced to the LAN is the NSA SW FW. There is a VPN tunnel between each site: Site_A Site_ B, Site_A Site_ C, Site_B Site_ C. The Internet of the Site A traffic is redirected to the Site B. This Site A Cross Site B to access the Internet and LAN B. Site A through C access LAN C Site.

  My question is: is it possible to remove the tunnel VPN Site_A-Site_C to and instead, through Site B to C LAN access? If so, how you can achieve this configuration?

  What worries me is the VPN tunnel options that allow you to redirect all Internet traffic or a specific destination of LAN through objects (screenshots from Site A) address:

  

  

  Without the redirection of Internet traffic, I thought about creating a group of addresses, including 2 B LAN and LAN C address objects. But I want to keep the Internet through Site B traffic redirection.

  What do you think?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hello

  My comments below:

  If you route indeed all traffic from A to B, the following must fill.

  1. remove the tunnel A C

  Ok.

  2. site B will have A subnet that is defined as a local resource for C

  Do you mean this by local resource?

  

  3 C is going to have A subnet defined as remote resource

  Ok.

  If you route any traffic from A to B, the following must fill.

  First step would be to remove the tunnel VPN between A and C, but I guess that you have assumed that it was already done.

  1. define the C subnet as a remote resource on Site A

  Yes, like a remote network for the A - B VPN tunnel.

  2. tunnel of site B to A will need to subnet C defined as local resource

  Ok.

  3. tunnel of site B and C will need subnet defined as local resource

  Ok.

  4. the site will need to subnet C has defined as remote resource

  Yes.

  I'll do a test soon with 3 sites and see how it goes.