SSL/tls over TCP using tcplistner socket or a tcpclient

Similar Questions

• Dreamweaver (on Windows 7) does not connect to the server, IIS (v7) using "FTP over SSL/TLS...". »

  I am weather evauating to buy Dreamweaver CS6...

  Trial of Dreamweaver CS6 (on Windows 7) does not connect to the IIS server (v7) using "FTP over SSL/TLS (explicit encryption).  I have a NEW Godaddy SSL certificate installed on the IIS server.

  On the connection between States Dreamweaver: "server certificate expired or contains invalid data."

  I tried:

  -ALL Dreamweaver Server configuration options

  -L' use of multiple certificates (I tried 2048 and 4096-bit Godaddy SSL certificates)

  -Make sure the certificate "issued to the"domain name is my domain name. "

  I am able to connect without a problem with Filezilla, Filezilla equivalent affecting 'explicitly require FTP over TLS.  I can connect both using Microsoft Expression web.

  This has been discussed previously. I recommend reading my old thread for details:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/thread/889530

  But to make a long story short, Godaddy is incorrectly signed SSL certificates on shared servers.  The servers/ips/domains and the certificate do not match.  So DW and many other tools fail authenticate with Godaddy SSL connections.  Some users have stated that other tools FTP, such as Filezilla as you mentioned, bypass and automatically change your connection to insecurity, but DW is very picky.  Once you modify encryption against zero, the connection will be accepted.  Best solution is if you want a certificate SSL correctly signed move to another host because Godaddy refuses to admit that they are wrong with SSL certificates on their sites.  These warnings will appear also to your users if you have a store saying the SSL certificate does not match the domain/ip and this can make users checking in a very nervous showcase.

• SPA112 & SIP122 - bytes of garbage sent using the SIP over TCP

  Because the port UDP 5060 is blocked in my case, the SIP over TCP is a good solution for me.

  But when I put SPA112 to use SIP over TCP, the server record is still broken.

  (I used the version of the firmware is latest: 1.3.3 but older versions has the same behavior.)

  After capturing packets, a problem is found:

  Each time before SPA112 has sent a message to register, there were 9 frames of data sent before him.

  Each frame has 20 bytes, and the content is the same.

  The 20 bytes has a motive: the first 4 bytes is always 00 01 00 00.

  So come with 4 * 4 bytes, for example, d8 22 6 b 17 d8 d8 d8 22 6 b 17 22 6 b 17 b 22 6, 17

  So, in the stream TCP, the register message is like:

  ....."k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. "" k... "k.NOTIFY sip:sip.callwithus.com:5060 SIP/2.0

  Via:...

  The server responded immediately "SIP/2.0 484 address incomplete."

  Then send SPA112 record message again, this time it succeeded and the server response "SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized '.

  Seems good.

  Subsequently, SPA112 has sent a new message digest information register but the bytes of garbage appeared again.

  Is there any configuration on this bytes of garbage?

  It seems that you hit the Nice firmware bug. I can tell you what I see in captured TCP stream.

  Your client is connected to the SIP server, but it is not start sending SIP messages - it STUN via the stream instead. You caught "STUN Binding request" nine times before the first SIP package. And an another STUN is tried before the second REGISTER.

  This is a bug with doubt - STUN have nothing to do in the stream TCP SIP. As the switch waits for the SIP packets, it is confused by byte STUN causing packets SIP to be misunderstood and rejected.

  Unfortunately, I have no idea how to report a bug in firmware to Cisco, unless you are willing to pay for it.

  On the other side, it would be that hard to solve the problem. Just disable the STUN.

  Thread mark as answered if it solves your problem, it will help others to find solutions.

• How to disable SSL 2.0 and use SSL 3.0 or TLS 1.0 instead.

  We want to disable SSL 2.0 and use SSL 3.0 or TLS 1.0 instead. We used the followign command:

  SET JAVA_OPTION = - Dweblogic.security.SSL.protocolVersion = SSL3 - Dweblogic.security.disableNullCipher = true

  but still SSL 2.0 is used. Help, please

  Deepak looking good so far.

  Let us know for any other help. We encourage you to create a service request with Oracle.

  See you soon,.

• Can I make a Flash frame as a bitmap and send over TCP/IP?

  I want to draw some combinations of bitmaps, vectors, flash, text etc and forms draw programmatically in my film using ActionScript and then get each pixel "rendered" my film (to the 100% view) in a table that I send to another program over TCP/IP. Can someone help me out here?

  The first part of the question is if its possible to render a frame which is a collection of Flash elements as bitmap? I know that I can browse a bitmap and get every pixel using getPixel method but I'm trying to access the last image rendered on my screen, including, as I said text and Flash Forms.

  The second question is what would be the best way to send this "video image" on TCP/IP? Can I use a XML socket connection? It's the only way I know how to send data from Flash over TCP/IP, but I don't know that if this is the only way - the help page indicates the data must be in XML format, which seems heavy for this application.

  I am now using Max/MSP/Jitter to make a screenshot, the size and the location of my Flash movie and then send the resulting matrix with a 'jit.net.send' object (which lets send you video over TCP/IP frames), but it's too awkward for installation that I'm building.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  -bob

  If you want to see is a single item, you can create a bitmapdata object and then call the draw() method and pass the movieclip containing all your assets.

  As for the second part, I'm not sure about this.

• Where to go to turn off the SSL/TLS e-mail client?

  Avast detected a secure connection from my e-mail program (processhelpctr.exe) to th POP server 244.1127.217.20 (att.net).  And asked me to disable SSL/TLS in my mail client so that the Mail scanner can analyze my mail.  The e-mail scanner will provide security SSL/TLS itself.

  What should I do?  Where can I find SSL/TLS to turn off?

  I would recommend that you uninstall Avast and reinstall without mail analysis feature.  Mail scanners do NOT make you it safer and often interfere with the good reception of the mail. Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
  --------------------------------
  https://MVP.support.Microsoft.com/profile/Brian.Tillman
  If a response may help, please vote it as useful. If a response to the problem, please mark it as an answer.

• After a virus, I am unable to connect to the internet. Event log messages: the NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error...

  original title: NETBios TCPIP of missing in Device Manager

  I recently had to run two antivirus programs on an infected computer and am now unable to connect to the internet. When I went to the event viewer, I noticed the following error messages:

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7000

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The helpdesk TCP/IP NetBIOS depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  When I look in the Drivers folder, I see netbt, but devices & Non Plug and Play Devices, of TCPIP NETBios is not listed in Manager.

  Hi Diddy Dell,

  Follow these methods.

  Method 1: Performs a search using the Microsoft safety scanner.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Method 2: Follow these steps:

  Step 1: Start the computer in safe mode with network and check if the problem persists.

  A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/315222

  Step 2: If the problem does not persist in SafeMode with network, perform a clean boot to see if there is a software conflict as the clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Note: After completing the steps in the clean boot troubleshooting, follow the section How to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state of the link to return the computer to a Normal startupmode.

  After the clean boot used to resolve the problem, you can follow these steps to configure Windows XP to start normally.

  (a) click Start, run.

  (b) type msconfigand click OK.

  (c) the System Configuration Utility dialog box appears.

  (d) click the general tab, click Normal startup - load all services and device drivers and then click OK.

  (e) when you are prompted, click on restart to restart the computer.

  Method 3: Follow the steps in the article.

  How to reset the Protocol Internet (TCP/IP)

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/299357

  Windows wireless and wired network connection problems

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

• Disabling NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  Don't know if I'm in the right forum or not, but I have about 25 remote PCs, all on Windows XP (don't worry, they will be upgraded to Windows 7 at the end of the year), for which I need to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP and run into a problem.  I tested this command on the command line on several computers in my cabin-

  WMIC / interactive: off nicconfig where TcpipNetbiosOptions = call SetTcpipNetbios 2 0

  Disables it very well if I'm typing on the command line with the PC directly - and almost immediately, too.  But when I connect remotely to a computer offsite (via ssh) which puts me at the command line, if I type this exact command, I'm locked up completely without response from the keyboard either.  I have to close the window - no other way out.  No idea why that might be?

  PS - I even tried to put this command in a batch script and calling the command and he locked up in exactly the same way.

  As I read the article on the first link of Azam, reality that turns off NetBT is set at the server level.

  In fact, the setting at the customer level to 'Setting use NetBIOS on the DHCP server' is the default, so it must be already set that way unless your users have been sleeping.

  There are other ideas in this thread--> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winservercore/thread/d18bd172-e1a0-4a61-ba52-0952a1e3cabc/

• Connection to blog___An error error occurred when tries it to connect your underlying connectio of blog___The was closed. could not establish trust relationship for the secure channel.__you SSL/TLS must correct this error before proceeding

  I installed Microsoft Security Essentials 2 days back... I get some error messages since then.

  I use Windows live writer to load my post on the blogger. My computer is Windows XP with SP3.

  Since installing MSE, when I try to post on my blog using windows live writer, I would say an error message:

  "Connection to the blog error."

  An error occurred while trying to connect to your blog

  The underlying connectio was closed. could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel.
  You must correct this error before proceeding. "

  Please help me solve this problem. Your valuable advice is apprecited. Thank you.

  Post in the MSE forums:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/protect/default.aspx

• [SOLVED] Error 404 Google + card Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface disabled in NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  I realize that it is a long title.  It could be useful describe my problem.

  Recently, I downloaded something (not sure if I can't talk about website) and with download received 4 bad files found by Malwarebytes named: PUP. OfferBundle and PUP. ToolbarDownload.  These 4 files were quarantined and then removed, but this does not solve my problem.  I ran Microsoft and other spyware, but nothing more has been discovered.

  I have Norton Internet Security, which extends constantly and I always have these terrible files.

  I can not access Google search engine.  I get this message: error 404 (not FOUND)! 1

  The address bar reads: cgi-bin/redirect.ha.  I have another computer and am able to access Google since the router same use so I know there are still a few malware rootkit on my computer which may be connected to the Teredo Tunneling adapter, I don't understand.

  I'm not sure how to solve this problem.  I don't know where watch, but ran many scans of data collection.  Here is a part of a single test showing wireless and LAN configurations:

  Windows IP configuration

  Name of the host...: StrikingEagle-HP

  Primary Dns suffix...:

  Node... type: hybrid

  Active... IP routing: No.

  Active... proxy WINS: No.

  ... DNS suffix search list: att.net

  Wireless Network Connection 2 wireless LAN adapter:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Wireless network connection Wireless LAN adapter:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b5fc:b411:6df0:e722 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b9d4:2772:d89a:3a5f (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::b5fc:b411:6df0:e722% 13 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address...: 192.168.1.73 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:35

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:34

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 13

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 320868474

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller

  Physical address.... : 2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:575:56e9:298d:9097 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7% 11 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.71 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:32

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:32

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 11

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 237781304

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Tunnel adapter isatap. {38655146-6231-4777-AB1C-2DC12E0017FD}:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft ISATAP adapter

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Local Area Connection * 9:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft 6to4 card

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Tunnel adapter ISATAP.att.NET:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  ... Description: Adapter Microsoft ISATAP #2

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2001:0:4137:9e76:2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8% 14 (Preferred)

  ... Default gateway. :

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: disabled

  Server: dsldevice.att.net

  Address: 192.168.1.254

  Name: google.com

  Address: 74.125.227.40

  74.125.227.41

  74.125.227.46

  74.125.227.32

  74.125.227.33

  74.125.227.34

  74.125.227.35

  74.125.227.36

  74.125.227.37

  74.125.227.38

  74.125.227.39

  Please note the last entry.  DHCP is not enabled.  NetBIOS over TCP/IP is disabled.  Now, it's for the Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface AND Google map is registered immediately thereafter with a list of IP addresses.

  Would be - why I can't access Google?  How can I fix it?  How can I activate this card Tunnel?  I want to do this?  I did a ping for the Tunnel of the card test and it seemed to work OK.  How do I know if card Tunnel is really on?   Why is the Tcpip BIOS

  people with disabilities in the last list of IP and not on others?  Why are all those Google IP addresses listed?

  Any help is greatly appreciated.  I'm very stuck.  Thank you.

  Edit = Edit

  has run another scan: MicrosoftSecurity Agent (I think) that produced a VERY long report, CBS.  There are a lot of mistakes in this report, and I don't know which ones were repaired my Microsoft or if errors are related to my problem.  Here are some of the errors.  All t errors are repeated throughout the report. I hope this info is helpful:

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, CBS Session info: 30218206_2956451109 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, info CBS doesn't have the package opened internally. [HRESULT = 0X800F0805 - CBS_E_INVALID_PACKAGE]

  2012-04-11 11:20:30, CBS M² info: could not start the download with pattern file: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_std.sqm, flags: 0 x 2 [HRESULT = 0 x E_FAIL 80004005]

  Hello
   
   
  We are pleased to know that the problem is solved.
  We know in the future if you have problems with Microsoft Windows.

• Direct reception of SMB over TCP/IP specifically in Windows 7 Pro?

  A year or two ago, I had a computer Windows 7 Professional on a NAT LAN with two Windows XP Professional computers, all on the same workgroup.  I have somehow managed to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP on the computer of Windows 7 (currently verified using the command ipconfig/all), and I followed the instructions at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/204279/en-us to implement accommodation Direct of SMB over TCP/IP on Windows XP-based computers.  This allowed me to access shares on any machine to another through sharing protected by password in the food safety using the IP address correspondent (not a problem my router is configured with the IP reservations for all machines; "I do agree not all printers).

  Everything was fine until I upgraded the XP machines to Windows 7 Professional and tried to implement hosting Direct of SMB over TCP/IP on them.  Unfortunately, the instructions contained in the cited link literally apply only to Windows XP.  I can't find a way to put them on the new Windows 7 machines.  I can't rebuild even how I disabled NetBIOS over TCP/IP on the original Windows 7 computer.

  So my questions are (assuming I want to use NetBIOS to implement file sharing):

  (1) is there a statement anywhere that explains how concretely to do Windows 7 Pro?

  (2) otherwise, if someone can translate the following instructions of Windows XP from the link mentioned in Windows 7 steps?

  1. Click Start, point to settings, and then click network and Dial-up connection.
  2. Right click on Local area connectionand then click Properties.
  3. Click Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), and then click Properties.
  4. Click Advanced.
  5. Click the WINS tab, and then click Disable NetBIOS with TCP/IP.

  (3) I would also like a test of window 7 viable this configuration as described at the bottom of the quoted link.

  Help with this will be greatly appreciated! -JCW2

  OK, I came across a translation of the above steps, placed the (wrong) statement of Microsoft to https://support.microsoft.com/kb/313314?ppud=4&wa=wsignin1.0:

  Go to control panel/network and sharing Center control

  Double-click each connection that needs to be changed (for example, LAN and wireless) individually, and then click Properties

  Double-click the entry of Internet Protocol Version 4

  Click on the Advanced button

  Select the WINS tab, and then click the button 'Disable NetBios over TCP/IP',

  The results can be verified at the command prompt by entering "ipconfig/all" and by examining the "NetBIOS over TCP/IP" entry under each relevant card.

  I hope this helps someone else... - JCW2

• ISE 1.3 authentication problem (error 12321 PEAP has not SSL/TLS)

  Hi all

  I have this error when authenticating on the wifi (on the cisco ISE 1.3)

  12321 PEAP doesn't have SSL/TLS handshake, because the customer rejected the local certificate ISE.

  I have a cluster of two VM. I also have a local certificate for both and Quovadis.

  If anyone has any advice, docs or anything else that might help, thank you.

  Concerning

  Eric

  Hi Eric, this error message indicates that the client attempting to authenticate does NOT approve the CA that signed the certificate to your servers from ISE. You use a self-signed certificate or do you have a public certificate from a public CA such as VeriSign, GoDaddy, etc.?

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Difference between IPSec over TCP and UDP IPsecover

  Hello world

  I'm testing the VPN to the user's PC.

  When I test the PC of the user using IPsecoverTCP it uses protocol 10000.

  When I check on ASA - ASDM under connection details

  ike1 - UDP Destination Port 500

  IPsecOverTCP TCP Dst Port 10000

  using Ipsecover UDP

  IKEv1 - Destination UDP 500 Port

  IPsecOverUDP - Port of Destination UDP Tunnel 10000

  Therefore when using TCP or UDP uses the same port 500 and 10000.

  Is need to know what is the major difference between these two connections just TCP or UDP?

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  IPSec over TCP is used in scenarios where:

  1 UDP port 500 is blocked, resulting in incomplete IKE negotiations

  2 ESP is not allowed to cross and encrypted traffic thus do not cross.

  3. network administrator prefers to use a connection oriented protocol.

  4. IPSec over TCP may be necessary when the intermediate NAT or PAT device is stateful firewall.

  As there are IPSec over UDP with IPSec over TCP, there is no room for negotiation. IPSec on the TCP packets are encapsulated from the beginning of the cycle of implementation of the tunnel. This feature is available only for remote access VPN not for tunnel L2L. Also does not work with proxy firewall.

  While IPSec via UDP, similar to NAT - T, is used to encapsulate ESP packets using a UDP wrapper. Useful in scenarios where the VPN clients don't support NAT - T and are behind a firewall that does not allow the ESP packets to pass through. IN IPSec over UDP, the IKE negotiations has always use port UDP 500.

• ISE EAP Tunneling SSL/TLS certificates

  Hello

  I'm working on an implementation of the ISE that will run OmniPass in several areas by using LDAP. The areas that I have in my environment are a production and post-production/tests of areas. Currently my ISE devices are related to AD production and use the certification authority certificates in our AD production. The problem I have is that I can only attribute certificate Local to be used for SSL/TLS for EAP authentcations tunneling. This means that when I try to authenticate a device that is not part of the directory assets production (pre-production), using the LDAP instance separate like identity store, his attempt to create a tunnel with a cert that is not of the CA of pre-production and so don't not with the following error...

  Failed authentication:

  12321 PEAP doesn't have SSL/TLS handshake, because the customer rejected the local certificate ISE

  This is because the device built in pre-production is not the CA production the as trusted entities. My question is, it is possible to define several certificates of separate CA to be used for SSL/TLS tunneling?

  See you soon

  Evan,

  Currently, it is not supported. However, 2 different enhancement request were filed to support this.

  CSCua59145    ISE should support multiple-server CA

  CSCud10660    Multiple subordinate CA in ISE for EAP authentication

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Client VPN with tunneling IPSEC over TCP transport does not

  Hello world

  Client VPN works well with tunneling IPSEC over UDP transport.

  I test to see if it works when I chose the VPN client with ipsec over tcp.

  Under the group policy, I disabled the IPSEC over UDP and home port 10000

  But the VPN connection has failed.

  What should I do to work VPN using IPSEC over TCP

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  Mahesh,

  You must use "ikev1 crypto ipsec-over-tcp port 10000.

  As crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp work on image below 8.3

  HTH