Direct reception of SMB over TCP/IP specifically in Windows 7 Pro?

Similar Questions

• Disabling NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  Don't know if I'm in the right forum or not, but I have about 25 remote PCs, all on Windows XP (don't worry, they will be upgraded to Windows 7 at the end of the year), for which I need to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP and run into a problem.  I tested this command on the command line on several computers in my cabin-

  WMIC / interactive: off nicconfig where TcpipNetbiosOptions = call SetTcpipNetbios 2 0

  Disables it very well if I'm typing on the command line with the PC directly - and almost immediately, too.  But when I connect remotely to a computer offsite (via ssh) which puts me at the command line, if I type this exact command, I'm locked up completely without response from the keyboard either.  I have to close the window - no other way out.  No idea why that might be?

  PS - I even tried to put this command in a batch script and calling the command and he locked up in exactly the same way.

  As I read the article on the first link of Azam, reality that turns off NetBT is set at the server level.

  In fact, the setting at the customer level to 'Setting use NetBIOS on the DHCP server' is the default, so it must be already set that way unless your users have been sleeping.

  There are other ideas in this thread--> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winservercore/thread/d18bd172-e1a0-4a61-ba52-0952a1e3cabc/

• [SOLVED] Error 404 Google + card Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface disabled in NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  I realize that it is a long title.  It could be useful describe my problem.

  Recently, I downloaded something (not sure if I can't talk about website) and with download received 4 bad files found by Malwarebytes named: PUP. OfferBundle and PUP. ToolbarDownload.  These 4 files were quarantined and then removed, but this does not solve my problem.  I ran Microsoft and other spyware, but nothing more has been discovered.

  I have Norton Internet Security, which extends constantly and I always have these terrible files.

  I can not access Google search engine.  I get this message: error 404 (not FOUND)! 1

  The address bar reads: cgi-bin/redirect.ha.  I have another computer and am able to access Google since the router same use so I know there are still a few malware rootkit on my computer which may be connected to the Teredo Tunneling adapter, I don't understand.

  I'm not sure how to solve this problem.  I don't know where watch, but ran many scans of data collection.  Here is a part of a single test showing wireless and LAN configurations:

  Windows IP configuration

  Name of the host...: StrikingEagle-HP

  Primary Dns suffix...:

  Node... type: hybrid

  Active... IP routing: No.

  Active... proxy WINS: No.

  ... DNS suffix search list: att.net

  Wireless Network Connection 2 wireless LAN adapter:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Wireless network connection Wireless LAN adapter:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b5fc:b411:6df0:e722 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b9d4:2772:d89a:3a5f (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::b5fc:b411:6df0:e722% 13 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address...: 192.168.1.73 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:35

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:34

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 13

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 320868474

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller

  Physical address.... : 2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:575:56e9:298d:9097 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7% 11 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.71 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:32

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:32

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 11

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 237781304

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Tunnel adapter isatap. {38655146-6231-4777-AB1C-2DC12E0017FD}:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft ISATAP adapter

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Local Area Connection * 9:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft 6to4 card

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Tunnel adapter ISATAP.att.NET:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  ... Description: Adapter Microsoft ISATAP #2

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2001:0:4137:9e76:2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8% 14 (Preferred)

  ... Default gateway. :

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: disabled

  Server: dsldevice.att.net

  Address: 192.168.1.254

  Name: google.com

  Address: 74.125.227.40

  74.125.227.41

  74.125.227.46

  74.125.227.32

  74.125.227.33

  74.125.227.34

  74.125.227.35

  74.125.227.36

  74.125.227.37

  74.125.227.38

  74.125.227.39

  Please note the last entry.  DHCP is not enabled.  NetBIOS over TCP/IP is disabled.  Now, it's for the Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface AND Google map is registered immediately thereafter with a list of IP addresses.

  Would be - why I can't access Google?  How can I fix it?  How can I activate this card Tunnel?  I want to do this?  I did a ping for the Tunnel of the card test and it seemed to work OK.  How do I know if card Tunnel is really on?   Why is the Tcpip BIOS

  people with disabilities in the last list of IP and not on others?  Why are all those Google IP addresses listed?

  Any help is greatly appreciated.  I'm very stuck.  Thank you.

  Edit = Edit

  has run another scan: MicrosoftSecurity Agent (I think) that produced a VERY long report, CBS.  There are a lot of mistakes in this report, and I don't know which ones were repaired my Microsoft or if errors are related to my problem.  Here are some of the errors.  All t errors are repeated throughout the report. I hope this info is helpful:

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, CBS Session info: 30218206_2956451109 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, info CBS doesn't have the package opened internally. [HRESULT = 0X800F0805 - CBS_E_INVALID_PACKAGE]

  2012-04-11 11:20:30, CBS M² info: could not start the download with pattern file: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_std.sqm, flags: 0 x 2 [HRESULT = 0 x E_FAIL 80004005]

  Hello
   
   
  We are pleased to know that the problem is solved.
  We know in the future if you have problems with Microsoft Windows.

• Base64-encoded data sent over TCP

  I'm having a problem with a stringbuffer sent over direct TCP.

  On the side of the unit, I have an application that sends a stringbuffer (surlabasedesdonneesdufabricantduballast) over TCP:

  Solution:

  I still don't yet understand why all "chains" which was added to the string base64encoded kept getting eaten, but my solution was, rather than send the string representation of all the data. I've converted the string in bytes and sent him in this way. It worked.

• After a virus, I am unable to connect to the internet. Event log messages: the NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error...

  original title: NETBios TCPIP of missing in Device Manager

  I recently had to run two antivirus programs on an infected computer and am now unable to connect to the internet. When I went to the event viewer, I noticed the following error messages:

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7000

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The helpdesk TCP/IP NetBIOS depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  When I look in the Drivers folder, I see netbt, but devices & Non Plug and Play Devices, of TCPIP NETBios is not listed in Manager.

  Hi Diddy Dell,

  Follow these methods.

  Method 1: Performs a search using the Microsoft safety scanner.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Method 2: Follow these steps:

  Step 1: Start the computer in safe mode with network and check if the problem persists.

  A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/315222

  Step 2: If the problem does not persist in SafeMode with network, perform a clean boot to see if there is a software conflict as the clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Note: After completing the steps in the clean boot troubleshooting, follow the section How to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state of the link to return the computer to a Normal startupmode.

  After the clean boot used to resolve the problem, you can follow these steps to configure Windows XP to start normally.

  (a) click Start, run.

  (b) type msconfigand click OK.

  (c) the System Configuration Utility dialog box appears.

  (d) click the general tab, click Normal startup - load all services and device drivers and then click OK.

  (e) when you are prompted, click on restart to restart the computer.

  Method 3: Follow the steps in the article.

  How to reset the Protocol Internet (TCP/IP)

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/299357

  Windows wireless and wired network connection problems

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

• IPSec over TCP on PIX 501F to the catalog

  Hello

  Is there a way I can configure IPSec over TCP as default configuration in the PIX firewall. I'm under 6.3

  The PIX does not support IPsec over TCP. It doesn't support NAT - T, which is IPSec over UDP/4500, which houses also of the Cisco VPN client. Just add the following command on the PIX:

  ISAKMP nat-traversal

  The PIX and VPN client auto-négociera if necessary IPSec encapsulation. See http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/gl.htm#wp1027312 for more details.

• SPA112 & SIP122 - bytes of garbage sent using the SIP over TCP

  Because the port UDP 5060 is blocked in my case, the SIP over TCP is a good solution for me.

  But when I put SPA112 to use SIP over TCP, the server record is still broken.

  (I used the version of the firmware is latest: 1.3.3 but older versions has the same behavior.)

  After capturing packets, a problem is found:

  Each time before SPA112 has sent a message to register, there were 9 frames of data sent before him.

  Each frame has 20 bytes, and the content is the same.

  The 20 bytes has a motive: the first 4 bytes is always 00 01 00 00.

  So come with 4 * 4 bytes, for example, d8 22 6 b 17 d8 d8 d8 22 6 b 17 22 6 b 17 b 22 6, 17

  So, in the stream TCP, the register message is like:

  ....."k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. "" k... "k.NOTIFY sip:sip.callwithus.com:5060 SIP/2.0

  Via:...

  The server responded immediately "SIP/2.0 484 address incomplete."

  Then send SPA112 record message again, this time it succeeded and the server response "SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized '.

  Seems good.

  Subsequently, SPA112 has sent a new message digest information register but the bytes of garbage appeared again.

  Is there any configuration on this bytes of garbage?

  It seems that you hit the Nice firmware bug. I can tell you what I see in captured TCP stream.

  Your client is connected to the SIP server, but it is not start sending SIP messages - it STUN via the stream instead. You caught "STUN Binding request" nine times before the first SIP package. And an another STUN is tried before the second REGISTER.

  This is a bug with doubt - STUN have nothing to do in the stream TCP SIP. As the switch waits for the SIP packets, it is confused by byte STUN causing packets SIP to be misunderstood and rejected.

  Unfortunately, I have no idea how to report a bug in firmware to Cisco, unless you are willing to pay for it.

  On the other side, it would be that hard to solve the problem. Just disable the STUN.

  Thread mark as answered if it solves your problem, it will help others to find solutions.

• Difference between IPSec over TCP and UDP IPsecover

  Hello world

  I'm testing the VPN to the user's PC.

  When I test the PC of the user using IPsecoverTCP it uses protocol 10000.

  When I check on ASA - ASDM under connection details

  ike1 - UDP Destination Port 500

  IPsecOverTCP TCP Dst Port 10000

  using Ipsecover UDP

  IKEv1 - Destination UDP 500 Port

  IPsecOverUDP - Port of Destination UDP Tunnel 10000

  Therefore when using TCP or UDP uses the same port 500 and 10000.

  Is need to know what is the major difference between these two connections just TCP or UDP?

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  IPSec over TCP is used in scenarios where:

  1 UDP port 500 is blocked, resulting in incomplete IKE negotiations

  2 ESP is not allowed to cross and encrypted traffic thus do not cross.

  3. network administrator prefers to use a connection oriented protocol.

  4. IPSec over TCP may be necessary when the intermediate NAT or PAT device is stateful firewall.

  As there are IPSec over UDP with IPSec over TCP, there is no room for negotiation. IPSec on the TCP packets are encapsulated from the beginning of the cycle of implementation of the tunnel. This feature is available only for remote access VPN not for tunnel L2L. Also does not work with proxy firewall.

  While IPSec via UDP, similar to NAT - T, is used to encapsulate ESP packets using a UDP wrapper. Useful in scenarios where the VPN clients don't support NAT - T and are behind a firewall that does not allow the ESP packets to pass through. IN IPSec over UDP, the IKE negotiations has always use port UDP 500.

• IPSec over TCP on Pix

  Nice day

  I would like to know if there is the possibility of configuring IPSEC over TCP on the pix Firewall.

  This features are supported by the latest Pix OS (6.3.3)?

  Thank you

  Diego

  The pix does not support ipsec over tcp. It supports NAT Traversal that is ipsec over udp. IPSEC over tcp is compatible with the VPN concentrator. The next link talks about NAT traversal.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/config/ipsecint.htm#1057446

  Take a look at this link to configure IPSec over TCP on a VPN 3000 Concentrator

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800946bc.shtml

• Client VPN with tunneling IPSEC over TCP transport does not

  Hello world

  Client VPN works well with tunneling IPSEC over UDP transport.

  I test to see if it works when I chose the VPN client with ipsec over tcp.

  Under the group policy, I disabled the IPSEC over UDP and home port 10000

  But the VPN connection has failed.

  What should I do to work VPN using IPSEC over TCP

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  Mahesh,

  You must use "ikev1 crypto ipsec-over-tcp port 10000.

  As crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp work on image below 8.3

  HTH

• IPSec over TCP works on VPN 3030 interface (3) external?

  I configured the third external interface and can connect with the ESP and UDP tunnel, but not with IPsec over TCP.

  The customer says:

  Unexpected TCP control packet received a.b.c.d, src port 10000, port dst 4408, flags 14: 00

  the hub said nothing, although I tried several event classes

  the document said "IPSec over TCP works with the VPN client software and hardware VPN 3002 client. It only works on the public interface. It is a client to the function of hub only. It does not work for LAN-to-LAN connections. "

  This means - it works on the public interface real, physical?

  or it should work on the external interface if I click on the checkbox to its public interface?

  Thanks for any advice,

  Martin

  IPSec over TCP is designed to operate only on the real public interface #2.

  There were a few technical reasons behind it, among them:

  (1) some clients cancel their tunnels on the private interface (one-arm-config) and that would cause a headache when trying to HTTP through the VPN 3000 if IPSec/TCP has been installed for Port 80/443. We decided to pull out of the private Interface.

  (2) that the external interface #3, we have chosen not to enable IPSec/over TCP Dynamics fielterso n it mainly because of the load balancing.

  Since the LB only works on real public interface #2, even once, we chose to leave

  IPSec/TCP out of it.

  Nelson

• VPN IPsec over TCP on PIX 6.3

  Hi all:

  Does anyone know how config IPsec over TCP on PIX6.3?

  Thank you all...

  Ted Wen.

  Hello

  You can enable IPSec over TCP to PIX Security Appliance Software Version 7.0 with the command "isakmp ipsec-over-tcp port. But I can't make it work and have posted my problem on the Forums of Discussion.

  Thank you.

  B.Rgds,

  Lim TS

• IPSec Over TCP

  When you set this option on the SAA, that affect all VPN? It is an element of configuration global, if I work with UDP VPN, but I am to set up a VPN using TCP, the other VPN still use UDP, or that they do not fail as the other end isn't the same configuration?

  IPSec over TCP is supported only for the connection to access remote vpn client for the SAA. It is not supported for VPN LAN-to-LAN tunnel.

  And Yes, it will affect all the client connection to access remote vpn for the SAA once you activate it in the world.

  Here is the document for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa83/configuration/guide/IKE.html#wp1059912

• Can I make a Flash frame as a bitmap and send over TCP/IP?

  I want to draw some combinations of bitmaps, vectors, flash, text etc and forms draw programmatically in my film using ActionScript and then get each pixel "rendered" my film (to the 100% view) in a table that I send to another program over TCP/IP. Can someone help me out here?

  The first part of the question is if its possible to render a frame which is a collection of Flash elements as bitmap? I know that I can browse a bitmap and get every pixel using getPixel method but I'm trying to access the last image rendered on my screen, including, as I said text and Flash Forms.

  The second question is what would be the best way to send this "video image" on TCP/IP? Can I use a XML socket connection? It's the only way I know how to send data from Flash over TCP/IP, but I don't know that if this is the only way - the help page indicates the data must be in XML format, which seems heavy for this application.

  I am now using Max/MSP/Jitter to make a screenshot, the size and the location of my Flash movie and then send the resulting matrix with a 'jit.net.send' object (which lets send you video over TCP/IP frames), but it's too awkward for installation that I'm building.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  -bob

  If you want to see is a single item, you can create a bitmapdata object and then call the draw() method and pass the movieclip containing all your assets.

  As for the second part, I'm not sure about this.

• New Windows 7 pro machine always prints the first page in a direction, but all other pages are printed in a different orientation

  We bought a new PC for one of our employees that is running Windows 7 Pro 64 bit. We have several printers throughout our office area. There are three printers that this person will print to the two Ricoh printstations and a Brother Laser printer. Any printer that employee uses printers still print the first page, a focus on the next page and all other pages in the other direction. The first page is always printed in the opposite direction of whatever orientation has been selected.

  If it has a four page document and select landscape as the orientation, the first page prints in portrait orientation while the other three pages will be printed in landscape. She can go back and print the document again and all four pages will be printed in the right direction. This happens no matter which printer she uses, as well as any program (Word 2010, Excel, Adobe, web pages, etc...). Any suggestions?

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads

  Hope this information helps.