stop a pl/sql block

Similar Questions

• SQL logical support for pl/sql block

  Hi all
  I have need of your suggestions and comments for the below question:
  
  I have two tables: table A and table b.
  
  Table has two columns as id and charges:
  
  Counties of ID
  -------------------------
  99 10
  13 999
  9999 7
  
  Table B has two columns Id and stopped:
  
  Order of identification
  _______________
  99 1
  2 999
  3 9999
  
  
  We need update of the order in the Table B such that Id with the highest number in table A stopped as 1 in the table B and it continue to increase enforcement for other Ids based on reducing the counts in table A. It will be like a job serving daily and search counts in table A and update the order in table B, according to her.
  It seems simple, but I don't get it. Please help me on this by writing a PL/SQL block.
  I'd really appreciate all your comments and your responses.
  
  Concerning
  Dev

  Hello

  Here's a way to do it:

  MERGE INTO     stat     dst
  USING (
       SELECT       s.id
       ,       ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( ORDER BY SUM (m.counts)
                                      DESC
                                NULLS LAST
                           )     AS orders
       FROM             stat     s
       LEFT OUTER JOIN  main     m  ON  s.id  = m.id
       GROUP BY  s.id
        )               src
  ON     (src.id     = dst.id)
  WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE
  SET     dst.orders     = src.orders
  ;
  

  As you can see, it is similar to the solution to your original problem.
  In the original problem, id in the table (primary) source was unique; now, it is not, and we are interested in the SUM of all values of counts, so we can use GROUP BY and the SUM aggregate function. When used in the same query, aggregation (such as the SUM above) functions are calculated before analytical functions (for example, ROW_NUMBER), so the aggregate functions can be nested within analytical functions.
  The big change is that now the subquery source produces a line for each stat line, or not this ID exists in the hand, and he ignores any ID at hand which does not exist in stat, using an outer join. "stat LEFT OUTER JOIN main" means that all ranks of stat will appear in the results, even if there is no game in hand, but the bottom lines will be in the results only if they have a match in the stat.
  ROW_NUMBER assigns unique, coinsectuive whole, exactly as you requested. If there is a tie (two or more ID having exactly the same SUM (account)) then ROW_NUMBER will assign numbers separate, consecutive lines. It will be arbitrary in what id receives the lower number.

• leave a pl/sql block

  Hi all. I'm on oracle 9i.
  
  I have a problem: I start my sql file, which has a share of some SQL commands and in it there is a part which is a PL/SQL block.
  What I want is that if a certain if the condition is verified, he must get out of the PL/SQL block and also he must leave all files!
  
  Here is a part of the code:
  
  drop table test1;
  create table test1
  in select * from test2;
  
  create the table prova_test1
  in select * from test_1
  where 1 = 2;
  
  
  DECLARE
  number of account: = 0;
  Valore number: = 0;
  contap number: = 0;
  valorep number: = 0;
  Stop varchar2 (2000): = null;
  BEGIN
  
  
  Select count (1), sum (val) contap, valorep
  of prova_test1;
  
  Select count (1), sum (val) in conta, valore
  of test_1;
  If conta <>contap or valore <>valorep then
  
  Training: = "exit";
  run immediately stop;
  on the other
  other sql statements.
  ....
  ....
  end if;
  end;
  /
  
  So what I want is that if the condition is true, he must get out of pl/sql block and the entire process.
  How can I achieve that?
  Thank you for the collaboration,
  Fabrizio

  Simply - what you want to do is not easy to do because you mix server with client code code and wait for the two to work in perfect harmony as if it were a single whole. It is not the case.

  PL/SQL code is sent to Oracle and PL/SQL anonymous blocks. They are analysed. Executed. Then, control is returned to SQL * more. SQL * more is do not have a "programming language" - it has a few macro commands. It does not support conditional processing logic (there is no IF command in SQL * more).

  To achieve what you want, you need to tell SQL * over how to respond to the mistakes of the Oracle server. Should continue despite the error? Should it end?

  For example

  -- // client call
  whenever sqlerror continue
  
  -- // server call: should this result in an error, continue processing
  drop table foo;
  
  -- // client call
  whenever sqlerror exit failure
  
  -- // server call: should this result in an error (exception), terminate processing
  begin
     .. pl/sql code..
  end;
  /
  
  ..etc..
  

  Very sure that you do not confuse the side Server and client - side you need to know exactly what is running on the server (SQL and PL/SQL) and how the client makes the call to the server, and how he responds after the call to the server is made.

• DB procedure / function can return multiple values in a PL/SQL block

  Hi all

  
  

  I have a problem returning to the exit procedure following in PL/SQL because I have SELECT INTO variable but with no output back in my PL/SQL block even if I turned it into a function.

  
  

  . pls suggest.

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE nominations (p_start_date AS, p_end_date IN DATE)

  IS

  v_day_id PLS_INTEGER;

  v_day_name VARCHAR2 (33);

  v_day_date DATE;

  BEGIN

  SELECT (2 + (p_start_date + (LEVEL - 1) + LEVEL - 1 - TRUNK (LEVEL - 1 + 1, "IW" + p_start_date)) AS day_id

  , TO_CHAR (LEVEL - 1, 'Day' + p_start_date) AS day_name

  , TO_CHAR (LEVEL - 1, "DD-MM-RRRR" + p_start_date) AS day_date

  IN v_day_id, v_day_name, v_day_date

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECTION OF LEVEL < = 1 + p_end_date - p_start_date;

  END;

  /

  Your insert would be something like this:

  INSERT INTO PR_OPS_APPOINT_SETS (SPEC_CODE1, SPEC_CODE2, CLINIC_NO, SECTOR_ID, USER_ID, APPOINT_DATE)

  SELECT r.SPEC_CODE1, r.SPEC_CODE2, r.CLINIC_NO, r.SECTOR_ID, USER, d.APPOINT_DATE

  PR_OPS_CLINIC_RECS r

  CROSS JOIN)

  SELECT TO_DATE (TO_CHAR (LEVEL - 1, "MM/DD/RRRR" + p_start_date), "MM/DD/RRRR") AS APPOINT_DATE

  OF THE DOUBLE

  CONNECT BY LEVEL<= p_end_date="" -="" p_start_date="" +="">

  ) d

  WHERE SPEC_CODE1 = p_SPEC_CODE1

  AND SPEC_CODE2 = p_SPEC_CODE2

  AND CLINIC_NO = p_CLINIC_NO

  AND SECTOR_ID = P_SECTOR_ID;

  In terms of getting the parameters p_SPEC_CODE1, p_SPEC_CODE2, p_CLINIC_NO, P_SECTOR_ID...? I don't have enough information on your part.

• change a pl/sql block using "bulk collect.

  Hello

  I have a pl/sql block, short it slows...

  DECLARE

  CURSOR CURUPDATE1 IS

  SELECT MF_TJ. UID_LO

  OF MF_TJ

  WHERE MF_TJ. DTYP (SELECT CD

  OF MF_DOC_TYPE

  WHERE MF_DOC_TYPE. DTYP_CAT = 'xx')

  AND MF_TJ. LINE_TYP IS SET TO NULL;

  BEGIN

  FOR T IN CURUPDATE1

  LOOP

  UPDATE MF_TJ

  THE MF_TJ VALUE. LINE_TYP = "NR."

  WHERE MF_TJ. UID_LO = T.UID_LO;

  UPDATE MF_AJ

  THE MF_AJ VALUE. LINE_TYP = "NR."

  WHERE MF_AJ. TJ_UID_LO = T.UID_LO;

  END LOOP;

  END;

  /

  now I change to use bulk collect, but I split it into two pl/sql blocks (each for an update)

  DECLARE
  CURSOR CURUPDATE1 IS
  SELECT MF_TJ. UID_LO
  OF MF_TJ
  WHERE MF_TJ. DTYP (SELECT CD
  OF MF_DOC_TYPE
  WHERE MF_DOC_TYPE. DTYP_CAT = 'xx')
  AND MF_TJ. LINE_TYP IS SET TO NULL;
  TYPE of recs_type IS the TABLE OF CURUPDATE1% ROWTYPE directory INDEX;
  REB recs_type;
  BEGIN
  CURUPDATE1 OPEN;
  Go SEARCH the CURUPDATE1 COLLECT in BULK IN REB 8000 limit;
  CLOSE CURUPDATE1;
  FORALL i IN 1.recs. COUNTY
  UPDATE MF_TJ
  THE MF_TJ VALUE. LINE_TYP = "NR."
  WHERE MF_TJ. UID_LO = (i) recs. UID_LO;-

  END;
  /

  
  DECLARE
  CURSOR CURUPDATE1 IS
  SELECT MF_TJ. UID_LO
  OF MF_TJ
  WHERE MF_TJ. DTYP (SELECT CD
  OF MF_DOC_TYPE
  WHERE MF_DOC_TYPE. DTYP_CAT = 'xx')
  AND MF_TJ. LINE_TYP IS SET TO NULL;
  TYPE of recs_type IS the TABLE OF CURUPDATE1% ROWTYPE directory INDEX;
  REB recs_type;
  BEGIN
  CURUPDATE1 OPEN;
  Go SEARCH the CURUPDATE1 COLLECT in BULK IN REB 8000 limit;
  CLOSE CURUPDATE1;
  FORALL i IN 1.recs. COUNTY
  UPDATE MF_AJ
  THE MF_AJ VALUE. LINE_TYP = "NR."
  WHERE MF_AJ. TJ_UID_LO = (i) recs. UID_LO;-
  END;
  /

  Is there a way I can just use pl/sql block using bulk collect?

  Thank you very much

  Hi 5181139

  As Paulzip and Jarkko Turpeinen have pointed out, you could do it using only SQL...

  This is a course using COLLECT in BULK:

  DECLARE
     blimit CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 500;
     CURSOR curupdate1 IS
        SELECT MF_TJ.UID_LO
        FROM   MF_TJ
        WHERE  MF_TJ.DTYP IN (SELECT CD
                              FROM MF_DOC_TYPE
                              WHERE MF_DOC_TYPE.DTYP_CAT = 'xx')
        AND MF_TJ.LINE_TYP IS NULL;
     TYPE c_arr IS TABLE OF curupdate1%ROWTYPE;
     c_rows c_arr;
  BEGIN
     OPEN curupdate1;
     LOOP
        FETCH curupdate1 BULK COLLECT INTO c_rows LIMIT blimit;
        FORALL i IN c_rows.FIRST..c_rows.LAST
           UPDATE MF_TJ
           SET    MF_TJ.LINE_TYP = 'NR'
           WHERE  MF_TJ.UID_LO = c_rows(i).uid_lo;
  
        FORALL i IN c_rows.FIRST..c_rows.LAST
           UPDATE MF_AJ
           SET    MF_AJ.LINE_TYP = 'NR'
           WHERE MF_AJ.TJ_UID_LO = c_rows(i).uid_lo;
        EXIT WHEN c_rows.COUNT < blimit;
     END LOOP;
     CLOSE curupdate1;
  END;
  

  See you soon,.

  Gas

• Huge performance difference between stored proc and anonymous PL/SQL block.  Why?

  Hello!  I searched various online resources and have been unable to find those who have addressed this problem, so I hope that someone here may be able to offer advice.

  I have a stored procedure that is approximately 300 lines long, takes no parameters, and sets a record and a few types of internal tables.  When I run it on a particular data set, it takes about 50 seconds at the end of my environment.  Unfortunately, it will have to be performed as a block anonymous PL/SQL instead of a stored procedure, because of the policies that exist about the environment which I deployment.  However, when I converted it to an anonymous PL/SQL block, make no other code changes whatsoever and it connecting the same schema that belongs to the stored procedure, it takes about 6.5 minutes (nearly 8 times as long) to complete.  Aside from the burden of analysis and validation, which could add a fraction of a second, can someone please suggest some possible reasons for the large performance difference and offer advice on what I can do about it?  In which case it is important, the procedure uses in bulk binds (for example, in bulk collect, forall) where it makes sense and doesn't call other objects in PL/SQL.  Thanks in advance.

  Without seeing your code, it is difficult for me to contribute more.

  Note also that...

  1 roles are turned on in the anonymous blocks but not (at least not by default) in the stored procedures. This is why the anonymous block could have MORE rights (those granted through roles) probability that you can get more items through anonymous block.

  2. ensure that, in both cases, it does reference the same target tables.

  Debug by calculating the difference of time after certain steps in your code. Who should get an idea on this or activate the trace.

• Error when you try to create a region of the page generated by the anonymous pl/sql block

  Hi guys I tried to create a region of the page which is the source and anonymous pl/sql block and I have been making a few mistakes. Basically what I want this region to do, is to give the current user of the application one summarized data compared to there user name which is: app_user the code I used was

  declare

  ven_ret varchar2 (15);

  BEGIN

  ven_ret: = (select u.vendor of USERS4ARCHITEC u )

  
  

  where

  u.e_mail = V ('APP_USER')

  and not exists (select null from arch_tbl I where u.vendor = i.vendor and user_id = V ('APP_USER'))

  order u.vendor in ven_ret);

  END;

  /

  the structure of the table to the USERS4ARCHITEC table is

  User varchar2 (15) vendor2 (20)

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  user@1                                                                          sap

  user@1                                                                          oracle

  user@1                                                                           IBM                                                            <---------sample data

  user@2                                                                          Oracle

  user@2                                                                          cisco

  the structure of the table to the arch_tbl table is

  user                                                     vendor

  --------------------------------------------------------------

  user@1                                                 sap

  So if user@1 logs in the application of the region using the pl/sql code code above should display oracle and IBM, because these two sellers are always under his username that he has already used a form to insert the sap into the arch_tbl table. Please tell me what I'm doing wrong here. Thank you guys

  Why would you build a type psedu at APEX report MANUALLY when you can just build a relationship with the same selection you use now for your pl/sql dynamic region?  What is the purpose of building your own report when the tool made for you?

  Thank you

  Tony Miller
  Software LuvMuffin
  Ruckersville, WILL

• "Declaration of execution" and anonymous PL/SQL blocks

  I often use control - enter to execute the statement that the cursor is currently over.  Normally, this works very well.  But it's a little twisted once I added an anonymous PL/SQL block to the worksheet.  As long as the anonymous block is the last thing on the spreadsheet, I can "run statement" as usual.  But if I add a SQL queries after an anonymous block and try to run the statement, rather than just the running query, SQL Developer aims apparently to compile everything since the beginning of the first anonymous block until the current as a block statement.

  For example, if I have a spreadsheet as follows:

  SELECT 1 FROM DUAL;  --run statement on this line works as expected, running just this query
  
  BEGIN  --run statement anywhere within this block works as expected, running just this block
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('X');
  END;
  
  SELECT 1 FROM DUAL; --run statement on this line goes back to the "BEGIN" on line 3 and gives a compilation error
  

  It is a nuisance major for me, as I have often a mixture of SQL and anonymous blocks on a worksheet.  I know that I can point out that the code I want and execute statement in this way, but I'd rather not have to do.  I was expecting that developer SQL would be smart enough to know where each block begins / ends and realize my current statement is not part of the block above him. Is there a setting that can change this behavior?  Or is it the way it is supposed to work?

  Whatever it is, thanks for the excellent tool.

  Add a ' / ' at line 5 and line 5 to line 6 bump

• First execution of pl/sql block is slow.

  Hello

  I've implemented TimesTen to improve performance of an Oracle pl/sql block.

  To do this, I created some cachegroups in TimesTen for caching oracle data.

  After everything is done on TimesTen, when we execute the pl/sql block on TimesTen, I observed that it took 35 seconds for the first run time on Timesten (compared with 48 seconds on Oracle).  The next run of the same pl/sql block with the same parameters take only 6 seconds. I want to achieve the same flow rate (6 sec) when the pl/sql block is executed for the first time. Can you please suggest what exactly I should look into.

  Thank you

  Amit

  Ye, it's a phenomenon known as I mentioned, but the 'hit' on the first run is usually not nearly this big. However, Windows as a platform is suffering more than most from this phenomenon and also Windows supports only not MemoryLock = 4, which further compounds the issue.

  Would you happen to have an available Linux system where you could test this with MemoryLock = 4, just so we can see what the difference between Linux and Windows? I think it would be a very useful thing to study to quantify how much this is due to Windows itself.

  A 'workaround' could be just application make a 'fake' execution of the PL/SQL procedure, immediately after I start and then all 'real' subsequent executions will be fast.

  Chris

• Oracle report calling in a PL/SQL block

  Hi all

  I need to call an Oracle (10g Developer Suite) report in a PL/SQL block. I read online that the same can be achieved using the utl_http package.

  Are there documents or links that tells how the above is achieved with an example? Also how to set the URL of the report?

  Oracle DB Version: 10.2.0.5.0

  Thanks in advance.

  AKS

  Use the package instead of srw. It is easier to use and has good debugging options:

  With the help of event publication

  (it is 11g manual, but it's the same thing for 10g).

• to change the pl/sql block to get the value of the user

  In this code rather than affect the value of the SID in the block, I want to get the sid of the user.

  Help, please.

  Oracle Database 10 g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - product

  PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production

  CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production

  AMT for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production

  declare

  v_sname t1.sname%type;

  v_issue_date t3.issue_date%type;

  v_book_title t2.book_title%type;

  v_book_id t2.book_id%type;

  cursor c1 is

  Select t1.sname, t3.issue_date, t2.book_title, book_id

  join T1 T3

  using (SID)

  Join t2

  using (book_id)

  where sid = 1;

  Start

  Open c1

  loop

  dbms_output.put_line (v_sname |) » '  || v_issue_date | » '  || v_book_title | ' ' || v_book_id);

  extract the c1 in v_sname, v_issue_date, v_book_title, v_book_id;

  When exit c1% notfound;

  end loop;

  Close c1;

  end;

  /

  Thank you

  If I set up a script that I want to pass a value, I just a configuration variable and name it and use it very similar to a procedure or function. Makes it easy to implement a procedure/function, or to convert a function/procedure in a PL/SQL block for test/debugging with relatively few changes to the code inside:

  declare
     in_sid  number  := to_number('&1');
  
     v_sname t1.sname%type;
     v_issue_date t3.issue_date%type;
     v_book_title t2.book_title%type;
     v_book_id t2.book_id%type;
     cursor c1 is
        select t1.sname, t3.issue_date, t2.book_title, book_id
        from t1 join t3
        using(sid)
        join t2
        using(book_id)
        where sid=in_sid;
  begin
     open c1
     loop
        dbms_output.put_line( v_sname ||' '  || v_issue_date ||' '  || v_book_title || ' ' || v_book_id);
        fetch c1 into v_sname, v_issue_date, v_book_title, v_book_id;
        exit when c1%notfound;
     end loop;
     close c1;
  end;
  /
  

• How to truncate the table in a pl/sql block

  Hello guys, I'm trying to truncate a table that includes data using a pl/sql block, so if the table has even a single row then the truncate should run. to do this, I wrote the following code
  
  
  declare
  number num.
  Start
  Select count (*) in the num from table_name;
  If num > 0 then
  truncate table table_name;
  end if;
  end;
  
  Now, when I execute the pl/sql block, I get the following error.
  
  PLS-00103: encountered the symbol "TABLE" when the expected in the following way:
  
  When I run the truncate without pl/sql command, it runs very well.
  
  Can someone please where I'm wrong.
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: 969224 on April 23, 2013 08:08

  969224 wrote:
  Hello guys, I'm trying to truncate a table that includes data using a pl/sql block, so if the table has even a single row then the truncate should run. to do this, I wrote the following code

  declare
  number num.
  Start
  Select count (*) in the num from table_name;
  If num > 0 then
  truncate table table_name;
  end if;
  end;

  Now, when I execute the pl/sql block, I get the following error.

  PLS-00103: encountered the symbol "TABLE" when the expected in the following way:

  When I run the truncate without pl/sql command, it runs very well.

  Can someone please where I'm wrong.

  Thank you

  Published by: 969224 on April 23, 2013 08:08

  DDL is not allowed directly within PL/SQL procedures.

  You must (ab) use EXECUTE IMMEDIATE issuing the DDL

• Ignore the error and continue the pl/sql block

  Dear all,
  
  Please help me to fix the script below.
  
  I had an obligation to write a pl/sql that will handle the update instructions.
  
  For example:
  A table that contains 10 rows of data. Through pl/SQL block, I update the 10 rows (or a smaller number of lines).
  Now, the scenario is by updating registration / line 4, oracle has met an error and then oracle leave pl/sql block and cancel the transaction.
  
  My requirement here is, by updating the records, if oracle encounters an error, it must raise an error or ignore the record and continue to process records. Oracle wouldn't pl/sql block.
  
  We are using oracle 10g.
  
  Thank you
  KODS

  As has already been suggested, you might check DML ERROR LOGGING

• pl sql block does nothing

  I have a pl/sql block and it does nothing why?
  
  The code is as follows:
  
  DECLARE @day varchar (10)
  
  BEGIN
  
  
  Set @day =' select to_char ('sysdate', 'DAY') of double;
  
  IMPRESSION @day
  
  END;
  
  Any ideas would be very appreciated.
  
  Thank you!

  The minimum code required to do this is:

  set serveroutput on
  SQL> set serveroutput on
  SQL>  begin
    2     dbms_output.put_line ( to_char ( sysdate, 'DAY' ) );
    3     end;
    4   /
  FRIDAY
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

  If you do not use a variable instead, you do not need to make a selection in this case, standard SQL features available in PL/SQL
  Note that:
  (i) ' set serveroutput we ' must be defined once per session.
  (II) semicolon ";" at the end of each statement, and
  (III) "/" tells SQLPlus "I'm done, please compile and run.

  SQL> declare d varchar2(10);
    2  begin
    3  d := to_char ( sysdate, 'DAY' );
    4  dbms_output.put_line ( d );
    5  end;
    6  /
  FRIDAY
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

  You have already shown a version using the ' select... in... from double '-that was the only way to do this in earlier versions, and of course, is how to get real data from real tables.

  T/SQL and PL/SQL are very different... you have been pointed out the docs, go read and keep reading and reading, reading and...

• Select the query within the PL/SQL block.

  Hello Experts,
  
  I'm just a beginner with PL/SQL.
  If I write a select query of client like fire against a database and SQL dev, it gives me result.
  For example: select * from employee;
  
  Now suppose that when I use the same query within a PL/SQL block:
  Declare
  Start
  Select * from employee;
  end;
  /
  It gives error during execution, by mentioning that an INTO should etc...
  I have my doubts here:
  1. is it impossible to use a simple select statement within a PL/SQL block (If yes why?)
  
  I know it's a very basic question, I tried to search it on the forum but could not find the thread, please redirect me to the link if it is already the answer.

  Please read this first. may ask why?

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/AppDev.111/b28370/TOC.htm