Teststand compatibility

Similar Questions

• LabVIEW and TestStand compatibility chart

  Hello

  There are various compatibility tables LabVIEW NOR as this Web site but it seems not to be a LabVIEW and TestStand compatibility chart.

  I think I found my answers, but I had to get through all the Notes version of TestStand to get.

  Hi Ray,

  The lists of the political of TestStand page on the different version of TestStand compatibility with:

  • Operating systems
  • LabVIEW
  • LabWindows/CVI

  (In addition to information about the cycle of life and support policy)

  Specifically, here's a screenshot of LabVIEW support:

  

  With each new version of TestStand, we will update the policy life cycle page, so you can always go for information.

• Problem with function "BD" in TestStand/LabWindows

  Hello, good day.

  I am having some problems with connection BD function I use in a personal function inside a DLL.

  I had a function called GetSensor , which I know it works because I have used and tested in the LabWindows environment.

  Its function is to return the value of an element in my database to give its input parameter, just that.

  

  My problem comes out when I tried to use this same feature in TestStand, it seems that the BD can only function in the same way of when used of LabWindows because always display a warning message, which is display only when the values of iHdbc are iHdbc is 11 or iHdbc is 10.

  

  

  The software that I use are:

  

  I know that TestStand is the opening of my DLL locks function it always enter, but failed the part then try to connect to the database.

  I think that this could be a problem of compatibility with LabWindows, TestStand, but I can't find where I can change some options to solve this problem.

  Thanks in advance. Any help you could give is welcome.

  I coud not answer before.

  The solution to my problem with the BD connection function should use NI TestStand 2014 (32-bit) instead of the version of NI TestStand 2014 (64-bit) that I used. Just that.

• How can I get the TestStand splash screen to not show up when I call the results treatment Utility offline?

  So I call the Offline processing Utility (ORPU) a not executable call results in a plugin to perform a personalised treatment in another configuration.  Everything works fine, including having run reduced (mostly hidden) by using the option/tray.  When he called, the TestStand splash screen appears (certainly is not a show-stopper but it's confusing from the point of view of the user).

  Is it possible that I can get this start screen to not appear when calling the ORPU?  I noticed in the help, mention is made of the use of the callback file, and I wonder if someone has successfully used this to avoid the dialog box or other behaviors.  I would like more info on how it works, but it doesn't seem to be a vast detail on this in the help, and I'm not also find me useful examples.

  The source of the Offline utility treatment results is included with TestStand and can be changed.

  The ORPU source is located under "Components\Models\TestStandModels\Offline utility treatment results"

  From the source, you can see that there is no flag that allows you to hide the splash screen (except for / I leave, but that it will also close the ORPU!); However, you can easily change the ORPU so it does not show the start screen by removing the following lines in \Components\Models\TestStandModels\Offline Results Processing Utility\OfflineResultsProcessingUtility\MainForm.cs

  If (! data.) Quit smoking)
  splashScreenForm = new SplashScreen (mEngine, false);

  Regarding the flags without papers, there are not really many flags undocumented in the ORPU (even once, you can see them in the source), and undocumented flags have very specific use cases (open files from shell and NEITHER internal regression tests).

  A (non-official) complete list of indicators ORPU from 2014 TS:

  /?
  Shows help

  / tray
  Starts the ORPU in the status bar

  / exit-when-done
  Exits when all files are made

  / I'm leaving
  Leave immediately

  /process - files - Missing - Data
  Treats the files even if they lack of data

  / which-process-files-Missing-Data
  Do not process files that are missing data, show only a mistake (it is the default behavior).

  / Process-All-Profiles
  Start all profiles

  / Process-No.-Profiles
  Don't start any profile

  / Process-Profiles
  Treat the profiles specified in the following arguments

  / process-files
  Add the files specified for the specified profile

  / log - level

  Sets the logging level for the newspaper ORPU, all of the messages above, the specified log level is saved.

  /ShellOpen
  It is an internal indicator, it is used to treat applications for the shell (for example, after a double click on a tsr in Windows Explorer). Do not use this indicator.

  / non-interactive
  It is an internal indicator used for the test. Do not use this indicator.

  Please note that NEITHER does not support appellant flags undocumented and that NEITHER is not guaranteeing backward compatibility of these flags undocumented and they could change at any time, without warning.

  For a more detailed explanation of the working of each option, refer to the Arguments of the command line Utility using TestStand treatment results offline.

  Hope this helps,

  Francisco

• 64-bit version of TestStand

  Hello

  When TestStand comes in a 64-bit version?

  Cordially Bjarne

  Hey Bjarne,

  I want to clarify that the current 32-bit versions of TestStand and LabVIEW are both fully supported on the system of 64-bit Windows 7 operating (I actually currently use it), given that the 64-bit operating system provides a layer to run 32-bit applications.  The compatibility issue occurs when you try to call 64-bit code modules in the TestStand 32-bit process, because the number of 'bits' cannot be mixed in a single process.  Currently, the call of 64-bit code modules only is possible by running modules of 64-bit code in a separate process, as described in the article that I referenced earlier.

  I hope that clarifies things for you!  I would like to know if you have any other questions about the use of TestStand on a 64 bit system.

• software compatibility

  Before I dive and upgrade to Sierra, I'm looking for a reliable source check the compatibility of the applications, I currently rely on.  Many are a bit dated.  Any suggestions?

  Main applications:

  Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 v 14.6.8

  Quicken for Mac 2007 v 16.2.4

  Photoshop CS5 x 64 new v12.0

  Roxio Toast 10 Titanium v 10.0

  Apple Pages, Numbers and Keynote ' 09

  Running OS X Lion mountain.

  Click here.

  (145086)

• I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5

  I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5. How this is done. Thank you very much.

  It is not possible to update Safari past 6.1.6 on Lion.

  (144969)

• How to: Crush 3/iMac 5 k (compatibility mode)

  Hello friends,

  I see quite a few new features on the market with Thunderbolt 3. According to the FAQ of TB3 Intel, TB1 and TB2 was designed with future upgrades in mind. This means that you can connect, once a solution is available, on a host of TB2 TB3 system using compatibility mode. It will only work to 20Gbps TB2, but work remains. The same is true of peripheral TB2 TB3 host computer (will work but at slower speed)

  This would be similar to the connection of a USB 3 device on a USB 2 or 1 USB host but only get speeds over slow or vice versa.

  
  

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters? What I've seen online seems to go using a device of TB2 and TB3 host and each of these adapters is Windows only. I have spent too many hours searching so I'm curious to know if someone has yet to fall on an adapter or converter that connect DisplayPort TB2 host and have the device USB-C/TB3 (USB - C not only) in compatibility mode.

  The reason? Peripheral TB3 are already less expensive than TB2 devices. I don't know who will get the most expensive. I don't care 40Gbps if he gives me a simple way to add multiple devices USB 3.0, exhibitions and maybe the eSata device. I know there are hubs, but I would prefer something that is the test of the future TB3 would be cheaper and future proof for NeXTGen computers.

  (Sorry for the TL; DR but it is always a person who does not read or "assume" it is a noob question and gives an answer "Captain Obvious". Don't BE this guy here...)
  

  Sincere greetings,

  Jorge Uptown

  JLopez. Chicago wrote:

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters?

  bolt-adapter https://www.StarTech.com/cables/Thunderbolt-3-cables/Thunderbolt-3-USB-c-Thunder ~ TBT3TBTADAP

  

• DIGITAL CAMERA RAW COMPATIBILITY UPDATE 6.21

  ***? How many times I have to do? I'm FED UP! I don't care ABOUT RAW! Update your program... I have

  NEVER USE!  NOT my computer!

  You're not talking Apple here.  It is a moderated forum for Apple to discuss features and troubleshooting. Apple-> system-> software update Preferences menu contains options to disable automatic downloads, although the Mac App Store update itself for Snow Leopard activates the automatic notifications of updates.  While a nuisance, you have just to tell more later, only choose to update once you have read the documentation to verify that its good operation with what you have.  Always back up your data before allowing updates.

  For direct feedback to Apple, who may have only one impact of future operating systems, http://www.apple.com/feedback

  If you find that a specific update has compatibility issues, we invite you to sign up for a free developer online account on http://developer.apple.com and submit a bug report to http://bugreporter.apple.com where you can know at least that if it's something reported before.  But this will not use or disclose this information here because of a confidentiality agreement.

• ANT or heart Bluetooth Monitor strap compatibility?

  That is, compatibility with A separate more specific ANT/Bluetooth Heart Monitor strap?

  Hello

  If preferred to use the integrated heart rate monitor, Apple Watch can measure your heart rate via an external pair Bluetooth chest strap cardiofrequence-meter.

  More information:

  Your heart rate. What it means, and where on Apple Watch you will find. -Apple Support

  Use the Bluetooth with your Apple Watch - Apple Support Accessories

• Corrupt Digital Raw compatibility update

  I have my macbook set to do automatic updates. I see a light red on the App Store, which shows an updated - and when I check it said provision, "Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20. I scroll down and see that it has installed this update even at least 10 times start on 13 August through 24 August! Even updated, same version and I think it's a corrupted file or virus! Help, I want to stop saying that I need to update!

  Hello cdaniels31.

  Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. I understand that the Digital Raw compatibility update, version 6.20 performed several times, but the App Store there is always a full update. I am pleased to provide you with advice for this problem.

  First of all, let me put your mind at ease. It is an updated official Apple for the compatibility of the RAW for OS X El Capitan image, not a virus. It seems that OS X is not recognizing that it was already done.

  Let's start troubleshooting by restarting your MacBook. Then we will try to complete the update by using the link below, instead of using the App Store.

  Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20

  Finally, restart your MacBook, once more.

  Kind regards.

• Compatibility «?» (Mac Pro Tower / Firewire / climax together, etc..)

  I take Logic Pro 9, but after looking at all the improvements for Logic Pro X, I can't wait to get up to speed.

  I like the look of the improvements to the plug-in; logic adding distance (not available for LP9?); Drum Kit Designer, synthesizer, etc.

  When he (LP10) announced that there is a flagrant limitation I had with my current set-up but I don't remember what the hiccup was... perhaps there is none and I could be good-to-go.  Can anyone confirm if and where I'm looking at compatibility problems?

  System: Mac Pro Tower (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xenon

  OS: 10.10.5 (Yosemite)

  Interface: Climax together - Firewire

  If I remember, the question I met was first introduced with the announcement of Logic Pro X was he needed El Capitan - which did not offer the divers "Core Audio" / support, which means that overall height (Firewire) would be uncertain if even not work at all.  "" Looking at the "tech specs" on Logic Pro X, it supports OS X 10.10.  That looks promising (if it in fact the issue with El Capitan and the lack of support for Core Audio driver still exists).

  Can I run Logic Pro X to Yosemite?

  Can I run overall height (FireWire) in El Capitan without the Core Audio Driver issues / Firewire?

  Thanks in advance!

  I must add, additional hardware, I am running is a UAD PCI card in the tower.

• compatibility update

  Hi I'm still stuck with Firefox and their nasa night launch addon - belt LavaFox & BlackFox Orions w / Grim Reaper (one who is all black, no shit bar gray and the drop-down boxes are black with white writing), it's the best setup I like for my computer and I've just updated to the new firefox and it is incompatible? I tried to download the other launch night nasa and that ' s when I got pissy gray bar and white drop-down boxes (shit) so I had to remove firefox and download a previous version of 2014 to correct the problem and disable all future updates.
  How you do this? you boast of personalization and are never compatible previous addons, that I don't want any other addons that this ive got! I think it's the best it is its completely black all the boxes included and somehow you will find it is too hard to make sure that all the addons have a single line of code that is also added to your updates, so they all work together and now I can't update and continue my experience with firefox now I am looking for the alternative browser options that give me what I like and allow me to keep it because it is always, unless I'm finding that you took my situation seriously and we will integrate the compatibility section of addon for all the new updates.

  Yours Sincerely
  Disgruntled users

  You were able to use this theme through 41 of Firefox, but it stopped working in Firefox 42?

  I think others have mentioned problems with the complete themes in Firefox 42, but I don't remember the details. I hope an update will come.

  In the meantime, rather than running a version with known security vulnerabilities, you might consider another variant of Firefox called the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is currently based on Firefox 38 with a few security updates. It is unlikely to have any change relating to the compatibility of the Add on, until next year.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.4.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) to rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\FxOld
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\FxOld
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in this FxOld file. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \FxOld\Plugins
  • \FxOld\browser\plugins

• Why can't Norton Identity Safe compatibility be integrated into the latest versions of Firefox? IE seems not to have problems with it.

  Firefox constantly asks me to upgrade to the latest version, which is not a problem as long as the new generation is compatible with applications that I serve throughout and rely on every day. I use the 40.0.3 version and it wants me to update to 41.0.2. If the Norton Identity Safe toolbar work with my current version of Firefox, what is the compatibility issue with a newer version of Firefox? IE does not appear to have this problem of update... which makes me consider the switch back to IE as my default browser. I rely on the Identity Safe to take care of my connection problems, and there is no need to deal with problems of incompatibility. I know I'm not alone in finding this aggravation with updates. (I use Win7 Home Premium, 64-bit).

  Sorry, this is a change in the types of code Add - ons are allowed to include. It was supposed to change in Firefox 40, but at the request of vendors such as Symantec, it was postponed to 41 of Firefox. I don't think this change will flip over. Norton is working on a new version, but I understand that it takes longer than expected.

  Here's what I suggest for users who need Norton password security features:

  Instead of freezing your Firefox on a non secure version, consider using the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is designed for businesses that require a cycle time longer between changes to the features, but anyone can use it. ESR is currently based on Firefox 38. It will get updates of security over the coming months, but not to get new features, so changes in Firefox 41 concerning the compatibility of the add-on will not be out for a good time.

  Norton is likely to continue to support the ESR until the new toolbar update is finished, maybe next month. After that, I don't know what they will do because normally they don't take over a small range of versions.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.3.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) simply rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Fx41
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\Fx41
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in the old folder. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \Fx41\Plugins
  • \Fx41\browser\plugins

• The addon compatibility?

  Just a thought.
  I had a complete theme I really liked called Silvermel.
  So, with the latest updates, it is more compatible with Firefox. I went to complete themes in Firefox Addons to see if I could find something else I liked and found that 95% of them are not compatible. It is not as bad with my other addons as with complete themes, but I'm still losing the use of 1 or 2 update of Firefox addons.

  Firefox is always talking about how customizable they are and then their advances make less. Improve things to the point where you're tell them improved it is counterproductive.
  Would ask you the developers of Firefox not change the things that the addons must be usable? If they don't then they should not be updated.
  Thank you!

  Thanks for the comments!

  Firefox is built by users for users. Feedback is very important to the development process.

  The best place to leave comments for Firefox is here:
  https://input.Mozilla.org/en-us/feedback/Firefox

  You can also access this page at any time to in Firefox by clicking the Menu icon (the one with three lines, looks a bit like a hamburger), then click the question mark at the bottom of the drop down, then click on 'submit your comments... '. »

  With regard to the compatibility of the add-on broken; updates do not usually break a lot of modules. But right now Firefox is going through major changes in how modules work. We worked closely with add-on developers to ensure that their modules are updated to be compatible with these changes.

  Unfortunately, some developers are trolling or have abandoned their modules in total. You can read more about these changes in the blog of Mozilla post titled The Future of development of Firefox Add-ons