The ANSI syntax for the join 4 tables-is this correct?

Similar Questions

• I'm having the problem of local connection on my Dell PC with Vista. ISP is Verizon FIOS. FiOS representative told me to disable Ipv6 and the problem stops. Is this correct?

  I'm having the problem of local connection on my Dell PC with Vista. ISP is Verizon FIOS. FiOS representative told me to disable Ipv6 and the problem stops. Is this correct?

  original title: local area connection problem

  Hello

  1. What is the exact problem you are facing with local connection?

  2. how many computers have you plugged into the network?

  Please provide the information of network event logs to help you best.

  Click on the link below.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/using-Windows-Network-Diagnostics-event-logs-to-solve-network-problems

  In the meantime, run the troubleshooter mentioned in the link below.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-network-connection-problems

• Tuning for sql join key table no consumer of the heavy use of the query processor

  Obligation comes to tunne prod of the query in
  

  high use of the query processor

  sql_id: fp79wb32h7a6t

  Module: AHC, P_PatientDQ()

  Cost: 7

  Elapsed time: hung

  Status: Hung, 35,253,460 day at 30 minute intervals

  -Create table

  create table ahc. PATIENTVISITS

  (

  ahcid NUMBER,

  visitId NUMBER,

  visitstatus NVARCHAR2 (100),

  visitdate DATE,

  visitintime DATE,

  visitouttime DATE

  )

  -Create/recreate the index

  create indexes ahc. F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID on ahc. PATIENTVISITS (AHCID, VISITID);

  create indexes ahc. VISITDATE_IDX on ahc. PATIENTVISITS (TRUNC (VISITDATE));

  First total number of table

  Select count (1) of

  Pvs AHC.patientvisits

  -Save County 1387485

  create table ahc. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS

  (

  ahcid NUMBER (19) not null,

  IDPack NUMBER (10) not null,

  visitId NUMBER (19) not null,

  dependentvisitid NUMBER (19) not null,

  isdiabetic NUMBER (2)

  )

  -Create/recreate the index

  create indexes ahc. K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID on ahc. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS (AHCID);

  Total number of second table

  Select count (1) of

  AHC.patientdependentvisits POS

  -Save County 774599

  Original request:

  SELECT count (*)

  ACH. PVS PATIENTVISITS

  WHERE PVS. VISITID IN (SELECT POS. DEPENDENTVISITID

  ACH. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS POS

  WHERE POS. AHCID = 37

  AND POS. VISITID = 218

  AND POS. ISDIABETIC = 0)

  AND SUPERIOR (PVS. VISITSTATUS) = 'PENDING'

  AND PVS. AHCID = 37

  Count (1)

  -----------

  1

  PL/sql Developer explain plan for the original query

  Owner of description Objects_name cost cardin bytes cpucost cost of e/s

  SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS			7	1	41	63669	7
  AGGREGATION OF TRI				1	41
  SEMI OF THE NESTED LOOPS			7	1	41	63669	7
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTVISITS	4	1	25	33295	4
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID	3	9		23164	3
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS	3	1	16	30375	3
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID	2	14		18093	2

  After editing the query

  SELECT / * + FIRST_ROWS * / COUNT (1)

  ACH. PVS PATIENTVISITS

  JOIN THE AHC. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS POS ON PVS. VISITID = POS. DEPENDENTVISITID

  WHERE PVS. AHCID = POS. AHCID

  AND POS. AHCID = 37

  AND POS. VISITID = 218

  AND POS. ISDIABETIC = 0

  AND SUPERIOR (PVS. VISITSTATUS) = 'PENDING'

  Count (1)

  -----------

  1

  PL/sql Developer explain plan for change request

  Owner of description Objects_name cost cardin bytes cpucost cost of e/s

  SELECT STATEMENT, TARGET = TIP: FIRST_ROWS			7	1	41	59257	7
  AGGREGATION OF TRI				1	41
  NESTED LOOPS
  NESTED LOOPS			7	1	41	59257	7
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS	4	1	16	36646	4
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID	3	14		24364	3
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID	2	1		15293	2
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTVISITS	3	1	25	22611	3

  here after I changed the query no display cost = 7 io wait = improvement also 7 can someone please help these

  How to adjust or rewrite lots of join not keys to multiple records on table table

  Thank you

  VSM

  you have not answered my question. Are you really calling it 35 million times in 30 minutes?

  If so, why?

• My Norton anti-virus software used to work and now it does not work with the new Firefox update. This corrected soon? Otherwise, I will not use the product

  Since your last update that my Norton toolbar will not work... If it does not work, will not use your product. Can it be fixed quickly?

  According to the article, I linked to before, you will need to update the norton version 2015.2.1.13 toolbar that is compatible.

• I didn't Photoshop CC updates for about 80 days.  Is this correct or am I missing something?

  Is it true that he didn't there had no Photoshop CC upgrade for more than 80 days?  I have not received notice for more than 80 days.

  You are currently at day then! It was released on 10-12-14, I think.

  Benjamin

• Columns in the dimension fact table

  OBIEE, can we use a column of fact in the related dimension table where this column is only a description column? Well Yes, I know that use columns of fact indeed and volumetric size... But what exactly will question if we do? I have observed in one model... No data connection was there to test...

  Hi Hari,

  Why you cannot create two tables MDB is as a fact and DIM and place all the columns in the description of Sun and measures actually?

  in this way, you should reach patterns star in MDB

  http://www.varanasisaichand.com/2012/04/fact-and-dimension-from-single-source.html  (2nd method)

  Thank you

  Angelique

• Select the view v - table

  Hi guys,.
  
  I was hoping just to get your opinion on something.
  I have a Production process that is taking longer and more time to complete, and sticks to a certain section of code.
  The code is an INSERT in the main dimension table.
  
  This procedure works well on the TEST and the code section end much more quickly.
  Traffic on the Production is much heavier and there are applications developed by people other than me who SELECT this dimension table. I am assuming, based on the fact that the Test and Production code are identical, this increase in traffic could be eating upwards of bandwidth and slows down the jobs.
  
  So I thought - if I create views and leave the other applications hit the opinions as opposed to the main table, this will help speed it up. I did it before on a Teradata platform using a "dirty read" that has worked very well, but Oracle does not offer this option.
  
  What do you think guys? Impossible this work or do I have to take a different approach.
  
  Thank you.

  You are welcome

• Question about the order of evaluation of the clause WHERE CLAUSE when the Oracle OF the syntax used to join tables

  Hello

  Oracle version: 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit

  I read the documentation online at joins. The page is avialable here: joins at

  My question is about the join order of evaluation of the conditions in clause and the conditions of those

  are not the join conditions and are placed in the WHERE clause.

  Consider the following pseudocode

  SELECT

  T1. Col1,

  T2.Col1

  Of

  Table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2

  WE

  (condition_expression1)

  WHERE

  (condition_expression2)

  Is it correct to say that if there is no column on the status of join (condition_expression1) in condition_expression2, then condition_expression2 is executed before condition_expression1? In other words, oracle always trying to filter based on the WHERE clause individually each table as much as possible before joining them based on the conditions on the article?

  Thanks in advance,

  Hello

  dariyoosh wrote:

  Hello

  Oracle version: 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit

  I read the documentation online at joins. The page is avialable here: joins at

  My question is about the join order of evaluation of the conditions in clause and the conditions of those

  are not the join conditions and are placed in the WHERE clause.

  Consider the following pseudocode

  SELECT

  T1. Col1,

  T2.Col1

  Of

  Table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2

  WE

  (condition_expression1)

  WHERE

  (condition_expression2)

  Is it correct to say that if there is no column on the status of join (condition_expression1) in condition_expression2, then condition_expression2 is executed before condition_expression1? In other words, oracle always trying to filter based on the WHERE clause individually each table as much as possible before joining them based on the conditions on the article? ...

  The reverse is actually closer to the truth, but we can't really make general statements like that.

  SQL is not a language of the proceedings.  Looking at the code SQL, we could say that the code does, but we cannot say much about how that code it.  In other words, SQL is a language that describes the results you get, not the way to get them.

  The optimizer will do everything what he thinks is faster if it does not change the results.  If any order in which they are applied (in outer joins or CONNECT BY queries, for example), then think of the join is done first, and the value of the WHERE clause is applied to the result of the join.

  Here is a query looks very much like you posted:

  SELECT d.deptno

  e.ename, e.sal

  OF scott.dept d

  LEFT OUTER JOIN scott.emp e ON e.deptno = d.deptno

  WHERE e.sal > = 3000

  ORDER BY d.deptno

  ;

  Output:

  DEPTNO ENAME SAL

  ---------- ---------- ----------

  10 KING 5000

  20 FORD 3000

  20 3000 SCOTT

  The scott.dept table contains deptnos 30 and 40; Why are they not in the result set?  The query behaves as if the outer join is made first (production 15 rows), then the WHERE clause has been applied.  All lines with deptno = 30 had sals down han 3000 and all single line with deptno = 40 was NULL in the sal column, then these lines are excluded (as well as other lines of deptnos 10 and 20), and only 3 lines above are left.

• How do I display values skyrocket in the IR filter for the joined table columns?

  Hello
  
  I have a problem in the IR the query is based on a table, joined with other tables. I would like to provide users the ability to use IR filter search bar in the joined table columns. The problem facing on this filter, the Expression field, by pressing the arrow button displays values for the fields in the primary table, but not for fields that come from joined tables. Have you experienced this behavior in your reports? Is this normal?
  
  TIA

  Hello

  Correlated subqueries can improve performance - but it does not depend on the involved tables, the number of columns and the existence of indices. As far as I know, the optimizer has problems with them. You could try to explain the Plans on the two statements to verify that.

  In any case, I created a new test page with the SQL for IR:

  SELECT E.EMPNO,
  E.ENAME,
  D.DEPTNO,
  D.DNAME,
  E2.EMPNO "EMPNO2",
  E2.ENAME "ENAME2"
  FROM EMP E, EMP2 E2, DEPT D
  WHERE E.EMPNO = E2.EMPNO(+)
  AND E.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO(+)
  AND E2.PRIMARY_EMPLOYEE(+) = 'Y'
  

  http://Apex.Oracle.com/pls/OTN/f?p=267:226

  As far as I can see, it works properly - except that if I do a filter on the ename column, when I try to create a second filter, drop-down lists ename all the values, while the other columns list only the available values after having applied the first filter. Which seems strange that the filters are applied as ANDS. But it does the same thing for other areas - IE, the field used in a filter is not filtered for the second filter - so I guess this is normal, but only a person in Apex could probably explain why it is so.

  Otherwise, everything seems to work as I expect and the above page works the same as my test page, which uses external joins http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=267:224

  Andy

• How it warns Oracle to use an index for the join of two tables...

  How to prevent the Oracle to use an index for the join of two tables to get a view online that is used in an update statement?
  
  O.K. I think I should explain what I mean:
  
  When you join two tables that have many entries sometimes there're better is not to use an index on the column that is used as a criterion to join.
  
  I have two tables: table A and table B.
  
  Table A has 4,000,000 entries and table B has 700,000 entries.
  
  I have a join of two tables with a numeric column as join criteria.
  
  There is an index on this column in A table.
  
  So I instead of
  

    where (A.col = B.col)

  I want to use
  

    where (A.col+0 = B.col)

  in order to avoid Oracle using the index.
  
  When I use the join in a select query, it works.
  
  But when I use the join as inline in an update statement I get the error ORA-01779.
  
  When I remove the '+ 0' the update statement works. (The column is unique in table B).
  
  Any ideas why this happens?
  
  Thank you very much in advance for any help.
  
  Hartmut cordially

  You plan to use a NO_INDEX hint as shown here: http://www.psoug.org/reference/hints.html

• JOIN the question... Join two tables without omitting lines

  I came across a problem that should be an easy fix (I hope), but I'm having a hard time to come up with a solution.

  Basically I have two tables, one with the actual amounts with the budget. I have to write a sql statement select that joins these tables together and includes all of their lines. I was able to join the tables by using JOIN, LEFT JOIN and RIGHT JOIN, but it always fails the lines I need.

  Below, I have examples of my tables (AMOUNT_TABLE and BUDGET_TABLE). For simplicity, I built the examples to show the same values in the first four columns, with the 5th and 6th columns (SUB_ACCOUNT, AMOUNT, BUDGET) as the only values that are different. My actual tables are not quite that simple, but I don't think it was relavent to this issue.

  AMOUNT_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT
  2013

  111111555555000010020131111115555551000100201311111155555520001002013111111555555300010020131111115555554000100

  BUDGET_TABLE

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	BUDGET
  2013

  1111115555553000200201311111155555540002002013111111555555500020020131111115555556000200

  Here's what I hope. Note that SUB_ACCOUNTs 0000, 1000, and 2000 show without budget amounts since there is not a corresponding line in the BUDGET_TABLE. And same for SUB_ACCOUNTs 5000 and 6000, they show budgets with no amount because there is not a corresponding line in the AMOUNT_TABLE.

  (exit)

  FISCAL_YEAR	PERIOD	ACCT_UNIT	ACCOUNT	SUB_ACCOUNT	AMOUNT	BUDGET
  2013	1	11111	555555	0000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	1000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	2000	100	0
  2013	1	11111	555555	3000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	4000	100	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	5000	0	200
  2013	1	11111	555555	6000	0	200

  If all goes well, my question is clear. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  Use the join ANSI - FULL OUTER JOIN syntax:

  with amount_table like)

  Select fiscal_year 2013, 1 period, 11111 acct_unit, 555555, 0000 sub_account, amount 100 of all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,1000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,2000,100 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,3000,100 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,100

  ),

  budget_table like)

  Select 1 time, 11111 acct_unit, account 555555, sub_account 3000, 2013 fiscal_year, budget of 200 Union double all the

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,4000,200 from all the double union

  Select 2013,1,11111,555555,5000,200 from all the double union

  Select double 2013,1,11111,555555,6000,200

  )

  Select nvl (a.fiscal_year, b.fiscal_year) fiscal_year,

  period of NVL (a.period, b.period),

  NVL (a.acct_unit, b.acct_unit) acct_unit.

  account of NVL (a.Account, b.Account),

  NVL (a.sub_account, b.sub_account) sub_account.

  Amount NVL(a.amount,0),

  NVL(b.budget,0) budget

  of amount_table one

  full join

  budget_table b

  on)

  a.Fiscal_Year = b.fiscal_year

  and

  a.period = b.period

  and

  a.acct_unit = b.acct_unit

  and

  a.Account = b.account

  and

  a.sub_account = b.sub_account

  )

  /

  FISCAL_YEAR PERIOD ACCT_UNIT ACCOUNT SUB_ACCOUNT AMOUNT BUDGET
  ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
  2013 1 11111 555555 0 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 1000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 2000 100 0
  2013 1 11111 555555 3000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 4000 100 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 6000 0 200
  2013 1 11111 555555 5000 0 200

  7 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.

• How to join two tables if you transpose the rows, columns and rows in one of the table

  Hi guys,.

  can someone help me please in the write request

  I have two tables

  Agents and Agent phones but in the agent phones table for the id of an agent it displays 4 rows because one of the column there types of different phones (office, mobile, home, fax)

  So instead of display 4 rows, I used max(case...) to convert rows to columns

  now how to reach it with another table

  Requirement:

  Database: 11.2.0.2.0

  create the table AGENT_PHONE

  (

  agent_id NUMBER (20) not null,

  agent_type_code VARCHAR2 (10) not null,

  agent_type_prefix VARCHAR2 (10) not null,

  Phone_Number VARCHAR2 (16) not null,

  phone_type_code VARCHAR2 (10) not null

  )

  CREATE TABLEAGENTS

  (

  agent_id NUMBER (20) not null,

  agent_type_code VARCHAR2 (10) not null,

  agent_type_prefix VARCHAR2 (10) not null,

  NAME VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL

  )

  INSERT INTO AGENT_PHONE(AGENT_ID,AGENT_TYPE_CODE,AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX,PHONE_NUMBER,PHONE_TYPE_CODE)

  VALUES (29709, ARE ', 'OFFICE', '4805551436', 'CELL');

  INSERT INTO AGENT_PHONE(AGENT_ID,AGENT_TYPE_CODE,AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX,PHONE_NUMBER,PHONE_TYPE_CODE)

  VALUES (29709, ARE ', 'OFFICE', '1111111111', 'PHONE');

  INSERT INTO AGENT_PHONE(AGENT_ID,AGENT_TYPE_CODE,AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX,PHONE_NUMBER,PHONE_TYPE_CODE)

  VALUES (29709, ARE ', 'OFFICE', '2223334444',' OFF');

  INSERT INTO AGENT_PHONE(AGENT_ID,AGENT_TYPE_CODE,AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX,PHONE_NUMBER,PHONE_TYPE_CODE)

  VALUES (29709, ARE ', 'OFFICE', '5556667788', 'FAX');

  INSERT INTO VALUES AGENTS

  (29709, ARE ', 'OFFICE', 'FLY');

  INSERT INTO VALUES AGENTS

  (1234, ARE ', 'OFFICE', 'MIKE');

  SELECT * FROM AGENT_PHONES

  AGENT_ID

  AGENT_TYPE_CODE

  AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX

  PHONE_NUMBER

  PHONE_TYPE_CODE

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  	29709			RE					OFFICE				4805551436		CELL
  	29709			RE					OFFICE				1111111111		PHONE
  	29709			RE					OFFICE				2223334444		OFF
  	29709			RE					OFFICE				5556667788		FAX

  SELECT * AGENTS

  AGENT_ID

  AGENT_TYPE_CODE

  AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX

  NAME

  29709

  RE

  OFFICE

  ROB

  1234

  RE

  OFFICE

  MIKE

  This is so the data we have in both table

  Now, I transposed rows to columns in the table of agent phones so I used the following query

  SELECT AP. AGENT_ID,. AGENT_TYPE_CODE,. AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX.

  MAX (CASE WHEN AP. PHONE_TYPE_CODE = 'CELL' THEN AP. PHONE_NUMBER END) AS CELL.

  MAX (CASE WHEN AP. PHONE_TYPE_CODE = 'OFF' THEN AP PHONE_NUMBER END) AS TURNED OFF.

  MAX (CASE WHEN AP. PHONE_TYPE_CODE = 'FAX' THEN AP. PHONE_NUMBER END) LIKE FAX,.

  MAX (CASE WHEN PHONE_TYPE_CODE = 'PHONE'. THEN AP PHONE_NUMBER END) AS PHONE

  AGENT_PHONE AP

  WHERE AP. AGENT_ID = 29709

  GROUP OF AP. AGENT_ID, AP. AGENT_TYPE_CODE, AP. AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX.

  	AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	CELL	OFF	FAX	PHONE
  1	29709	RE	OFFICE	4805551436	2223334444	5556667788	1111111111

  My question is how this to join the agents table so that my output should be like this...

  I want to display all the results in the table of the Agent, even if they are not in the table of agent phones. As you can see there are other agent id 1234 is also populated

  AGENT_ID

  AGENT_TYPE_CODE

  AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX

  NAME

  AGENT_ID

  AGENT_TYPE_CODE

  AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX

  CELL

  PHONE

  OFF

  FAX

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  	29709		RE					OFFICE					ROB			29709		RE					OFFICE				4805551436		1111111111		2223334444		5556667788
  	1234		RE					OFFICE					MIKE

  Currently, I run this query and I get the output as below

  SELECT *.

  AGENTS HAS

  LEFT OUTER JOIN AGENT_PHONE AP

  ON A.AGENT_ID = AP. AGENT_ID

  AND A.AGENT_TYPE_CODE = AGENT_TYPE_CODE.

  AND A.AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX = AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX.

  	AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	NAME	AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	PHONE_NUMBER	PHONE_TYPE_CODE
  1	29709	RE	OFFICE	ROB	29709	RE	OFFICE	4805551436	CELL
  2	29709	RE	OFFICE	ROB	29709	RE	OFFICE	1111111111	PHONE
  3	29709	RE	OFFICE	ROB	29709	RE	OFFICE	2223334444	OFF
  4	29709	RE	OFFICE	ROB	29709	RE	OFFICE	5556667788	FAX
  5	1234	RE	OFFICE	MIKE

  I want id 29709 agent in a line with 1234 agent also id to display

  You can rotate your phone number of agent in columns

  Select *.

  of AGENT_PHONE

  pivot)

  min (PHONE_NUMBER)

  for PHONE_TYPE_CODE in ('CELL' as a 'CELL', 'PHONE' like 'PHONE', 'OFF' in the 'OFF', 'FAX' as 'FAX')

  )

  AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	CELL	PHONE	OFF	FAX
  29709	RE	OFFICE	4805551436	1111111111	2223334444	5556667788

  Then you can join to view inline or CTE

  with AGENT_PHONE_PIVOT like)

  Select *.

  of AGENT_PHONE

  pivot)

  min (PHONE_NUMBER)

  for PHONE_TYPE_CODE in ('CELL' as a 'CELL', 'PHONE' like 'PHONE', 'OFF' in the 'OFF', 'FAX' as 'FAX')

  )

  )

  SELECT *.

  AGENTS HAS

  LEFT OUTER JOIN AGENT_PHONE_PIVOT AP

  ON A.AGENT_ID = AP. AGENT_ID

  AND A.AGENT_TYPE_CODE = AGENT_TYPE_CODE.

  AND A.AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX = AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX.

  AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	NAME	AGENT_ID	AGENT_TYPE_CODE	AGENT_TYPE_PREFIX	CELL	PHONE	OFF	FAX
  29709	RE	OFFICE	ROB	29709	RE	OFFICE	4805551436	1111111111	2223334444	5556667788
  1234	RE	OFFICE	MIKE	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

  Is that what you're looking for?

• How to join two tables to retrieve the data from the columns in table two. Tables have primary and foreign key relationships

  Hello

  I want to join the two tables to retrieve the data from the columns of the two table passing parameters to the join query. Tables have primary and foreign key relationships

  Details of the table

  Alert-1 - AlertCode (FK), AlerID (PK)

  2 AlertCode-AlertDefinition-(PK)

  Help, please

  
  

  ----------
  

  Hi Vincent,.

  I think that you have not worked on adf 12.1.3.  In adf 12.1.3 you don't have to explicitly create the association. When you create the EO to your table, Association xxxxFkAssoc, will be created by ADF12.1.3 for you automatically. Please try this and do not answer anything... You can also follow the links below. I solved the problem by using the following link

  Oracle ADF Guide step by step - Oracle ADF tutorial: creating a relationship of the master / detail using Oracle ADF

  ---

• Help with a script to search for text in a table cell and apply the cell style

  Hello

  I build the script which Jongware wrote in his post here http://indesignsecrets.com/tackling-tables-through-scripting.php - I am trying to create a variable in which I can add a number of different parts of the text, in this case it's different parts of the United Kingdom i.e. 'London', 'East', 'Scotland' etc. I just need the script to apply the cell Style - 'District Cell' - to any cell that contains text in the variable. Here's the script, if anyone can help I would be grateful.

  function checkWhichTable()
  {
  // ensure the user made a selection
  if (app.selection.length != 1)
  return null;
  var currentTable = app.selection[0];
  if (currentTable.hasOwnProperty("baseline"))
  {
  currentTable = app.selection[0].parent;
  }
  while (currentTable instanceof Cell || currentTable instanceof Row || currentTable instanceof Column)
  currentTable = currentTable.parent;
  if (!(currentTable instanceof Table))
  {
  // No table selected
  return null;
  }
  return currentTable;
  }
  app.doScript(checkUserSelection, ScriptLanguage.JAVASCRIPT, undefined, UndoModes.ENTIRE_SCRIPT, "Process Table");
  
  
  function checkUserSelection ()
  {
  var a_table = checkWhichTable();
  if (a_table == null)
  {
  if (confirm("No table selected. Do you want to process *all* tables?") == false)
  return;
  allTables = app.activeDocument.stories.everyItem().tables.everyItem().getElements();
  for (aTable=0; aTable<allTables.length; aTable++)
  {
  processTable (allTables[aTable]);
  }
  } else
  {
  processTable (a_table);
  }
  }
  function processTable(table)
  {
  // do something here!
  
  
  //Find Text in Cell and apply Cell Style
  var textInCell=['London', 'Scotland', 'South West'];
  for (i=0; i<table.cells.length; i++)
  {
  if (table.cells[i].texts[0].contents==textInCell)
  table.cells[i].appliedCellStyle = "District Cell";
  }
  
  
  
  
  }
  

  Hello

  Change this feature:

  function processTable(table)
  {
  //Find Text (exactly as it is) in Cell and apply Cell Style
  var
    textInCell=['London', 'Scotland', 'South West'],
    mFound, cFound;
  
  app.findGrepPreferences = null;
  app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = "^(" + cities.join("|") + ")$";
  mFound = table.findGrep();
  while( cFound = mFound.pop() )
    cFound.parent.appliedCellStyle = "District Cell";
  }
  

  Jarek

• Need to know the grain of the join table

  Hi Experts,
  
  I have a doubt,
  
  Let say I take data from two tables
  pay_costs
  PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F
  
  for tables, the columns are
  pay_costs. BALANCE_OR_COSTS
  pay_costs. DEBIT_OR_CREDIT
  
  PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F.PROPORTION
  
  Now, I need to join these two tables respectively. I followed site etrm and found that we can create the join
  
  PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F.PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX = PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX. PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX
  and PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX. COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID = pay_costs. COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID
  
  so I'm doing something wrong. The grain of the data is going to change... Help kindly I am new to the field of ebs

  Hello
  You will potentially have millions of records in PAY_COSTS because it's the main compensation table.

  Your PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F contains only a breakdown of how the costs of a user should be broken out. There is an ASSIGNMENT_ID (which connects to the person) and a PROPORTION corresponding to the percentage.

  Depending on how long the person has been with the company, for each assignment ID (that you can consider PERSON_ID), there might be hundreds of files in PAY_COSTS.

  The primary key of the PAY_COSTS is the COST_ID while the primary key of the PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F is COST_ALLOCATION_ID more EFFECTIVE BEGIN and EFFECTIVE END dates. Which tells me, is that the benefits are time and if you try and join the ALLOCATION_ID you will end up with a wrong answer. If you were within the E-Business Suite, application effective date using the current date as the default value. Then, it does is apply a filter on all tables that have dates of application. Thus, for example, you may have to limit benefits to know those that this could be done using this SQL:

  SELECT
  ASSIGNMENT_ID, COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID, PROPORTION
  Of
  HR. PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F
  WHERE
  SYSDATE BETWEEN EFFECTIVE_START_DATE AND EFFECTIVE_END_DATE
  ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT_ID, COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID

  You can get a clue by COUNT (*) from the two tables. If there are more records from a table that another so you can be sure that there is not a join one of 1:1 and therefore the granularity must be 1: n one-to-many

  Hope this helps
  Michael