Similar Questions

• Cross spectral power and consistency of the 2 signals

  Hello

  I try to get the cross-spectral power and consistency of the two signals. I should be able to get this:

  "The cross-spectral power and consistency of these 2 signals have been calculated on a window (8.5 minutes) 1024-sample using the fast Fourier transform applied to the 3 overlapping of the panes of 512-sample in the window of 1024 consistency." In each pane, the data were the first linear straightened and with windows by using the Hanning (cosine) function before the calculation of the Fourier transform. The 1024 coherence window was so advanced by 256 samples (2.1 minutes), and the calculation repeated until all BDUS/interval of N - N series have been analyzed.

  We used the product of consistency and the cross-spectral energy to weight these 2 effects in order to quantify the degree of the hitch.

  I should get this chart type

  

  The RR signal I straightened before that trying to get the power crossed with sampling freq = 2. And I put 2 ways to get it.

  consistency too and later the product of the two. Im trying to get the spectrogram and watch later 3d like picture.

  I have attached the vi.

  Consistency is perhaps badly fixed.

  Thanks for the help, guys.

  Kind regards.

  you made a few mistakes, example en by overhauling it you can't do the segments overlap, that's why you should go with a loop and the creation of a subset (and this is why I suggested para window ASD)

  You must also set the indexing of the product release and do not concatenate, penny you released 2d end that you can use for 3d graphics

  FS in the mathscipt should also be in hz, not in seconds, I told you the last time (he is shown in the help)

• Should be checked for consistency

  I received the following message during the time I turn on my computer, "one of your drives should be checked for consistency. You can cancel the disk check, but it is strongly recommended that you continue. To skip disk checking, press a button within 10 seconds. »

  Then I press any key to cancel, but restart the computer again and the same message on the screen shows. Please let me know how I can fix this problem, thanks.

  After a regular stop. Turning off too soon may cause chkdsk run. But I guess you do.

  Interestingly, something different may be at stake.
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/831374 tells a similar message if there are too many files on the disk and that you are not running the latest service pack.

  If this happens during more than once then-
  Well, if it was the 1st time in 2nd or 3rd then maybe you don't shut down the computer properly, can you just don't let the scan disk utility (the tool that checks your hard drive for consistency) to complete its work when the pc starts. But if this is not the case, then maybe your hard drive has developed bad sectors, or there may be another problem with him.

  To check the conditions weather, the above is true then right-click on the drive on which is checked at startup and select scan disk. See the results and you will probably notice the problem yourself.

• "Error - disk should be checked for consistency", computer does not complete check of the disk system.

  Original title: computer refuses to perform disk full system check.

  After that I turned on computer always run a check disk systems saying 'need to drive to check for consistency', it stops at 82%, the disc makes noise.  It is said that he replaced bad clusters in file and after checking the window/options/install/win_18.CAB, it stops there.  She always checks the drive C. Checked for viruses, no.  Any ideas?

  Hi DanaCox,

  You did it of any material changes or software on the computer before this problem?

  I suggest you chkdsk from the Recovery Console and check if the problem persists.

  At the Recovery Console prompt, type which Suits, and then press ENTER:

  CHKDSK [/ p]: [/ r]

  Note: At first, try to run chkdsk/p & check if it helps. Later, you can run chkdsk/r.

  
  Reference: How to install and use the Windows XP Recovery Console

  To start the computer and use the Recovery Console

  Hope the helps of information.
  Please post back and we do know.

• Error: "one of the drives should be checked for consistency" to start the computer

  The original title: disk space

  My laptop is an Acer Aspire 5000 running with XP Home Edition. At a hard 100G drive with 2 partitions fat. Recursively shows problem at startup. The message displayed is "one of the drives should be checked for consistency. So when he was checked always check disk space and get stored at 41%. I tried to restore several times, but it is once again no place for a long time.

  Could you help me with this?

  Hi RodrigoGodinez,
   
  Sometimes the disk check always starts check the file system on one or more drives for consistency. If no button is pressed, the disk check is aborted. In fact, it is because a data structure of the disc or file is corrupted which can not be recovered and check disk always runs at Windows startup.
   
  Restart the computer and run the command chkdsk from the recovery console.
   
  To boot into the recovery console, see the following article:
  Description of the Windows XP Recovery Console for advanced users
   
  Additional reference on:
  Recovery Console overview
   
  For more information about the disk check, see:
  How to perform disk error checking in Windows XP
   
  Note: While running chkdsk on the drive if bad sectors are found on the hard drive when chkdsk attempts to repair this area so all available data on this risk to be lost.
   
  If the disk check done in start the computer every time, here is an article that could be useful for:
  Chkdsk.exe or Autochk.exe starts when you try to shut down or restart your computer

• my laptop continued to go to the blue screen that says disc C needs the consistency check

  It says checking file system on C: the type of the file system is FAT32, one of your disks needs to be checked for consistency...

  Windows® will force a check disk when it detects that a volume has been dismantled not properly or may be damaged.  If it detects the need for control is somewhat variable.

  Windows® always sets a bit in the master file Table (MFT) indicating that the table is opened when he set up a disc.  At that time, he creates one in memory a copy the MFT in which he first made changes, then planned to be written to disk.  She does it for operations files of speed.  If the system is out of tension or breaks down, the copy of the MFT in memory is not written to disk.  Files and folders may be lost, the list of the blocks that are allocated and free on the volume can be corrupted.  It really bad case, blocks can be assigned to multiple files.  So little open of the MFT is defined at the beginning of Windows®, it can schedule a check disk.  Compromise power and system hangs often lead to the automatic functioning of 'chkdsk '.  Even if Windows® is not, it is often a good idea to run or schedule a check disk if a system is turned off without stopping or if it crashes.

  Thresholds of power can even cause physical damage disc if it is written sectors when turned off and can cause unrecoverable errors.

  Letting Windows® check records is an important part of its operation and must not be ignored without a really good reason.

  Skip the drive checks because we can't be bothered, or not wanting to wait for the cheque is jeopardizing the basic integrity of the system.  Once a disk check is scheduled, Windows® will persist in asking to perform the audit, until it is actually executed.  One can notice a regular disk check as if a regular disk check is not allowed.

  Ignore you the check disk at your own risk and peril and you better have a good backup if you do!

• "Your drive should be checked for consistency.

  Hello

  I was wondering if you could help us?  I am running Vista on a Dell laptop and recently have been receiveing "your drive should be checked for consistency" at the start - it, then crosses the chkdsk to BACK process.  It goes through the process very well, deleting some files and move others. However, once I have connected to Windows, my laptop does work for a few minutes before freezing completely upwards. I thought it was just streaming elements that aggravate freeze it, but it seems to freeze no matter what I do.  I continue to have force a switch to stop/off that I can't even restart.

  Its been my computer completely unusable - is there something I can do to solve this problem, apart from buying a new one?

  Thank you!

  Katie

  Thanks - how could I do?  Is this a hardware problem?

  Sounds like it... You said, "it goes through the process very well, deleting some files and moving others." which tells CHKDSK is to find questions and tries to compensate for them.  However, who can only go so far and if there are internal physical damage on the disc itself (disk drive I guess - not an SSD) then the damage could extend.  Sooner or later, you might get to a point where you don't even have the option to boot.

  What your backups?

  You can find the manufacturer of the hard drive itself and get their diagnostic utilities and test the drive entirely with those.  That will tell you if you have real bad sectors and like it or whether a zero and writing with their utility and the new installation of the operating system could help.  It is more likely that it is a pity however.

• "The device, \Device\Harddisk0\DR0, has a bad block" on Dell Vista SP2

  I am repeatedly getting the error "the device, \Device\Harddisk0\DR0, has a bad block." in the event viewer. Recently, I fixed a security problem that prevented me to install windows updates. For this, I ran CHKDSK (see results below), System File Checker, and a complete analysis of the system of McAfee, spybot and Malwarebytes, both in security and the good start. How can I check for errors on my HARD disk?

  --------------------------------------------
  My problem earlier wire: http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/is/genuinevista/thread/60c76236-abd2-4fea-8980-007f424a8eb0

  Although most things seem to work very well, "the device, \Device\Harddisk0\DR0, has a bad block." error still occurs in the event viewer despite the installation of updates/CHKDSK and SFC. Check the results of said disc 'the volume is clean' and the System File Checker showed no errors. Windows resource protection did not find any breach of integrity. Any ideas, what is happening?

  In addition, I don't know if this is related, but a problem with the wireless network connection keeps recurring. "Windows wireless service" is not automatically start during the boot. It must manually be diagnosed and started. He gave the following error message:

  

  In network connections, the IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are verified and most up-to-date driver software is installed. When I tried to update the drivers under devices, I got the following message. "The best driver for your device is already installed. Windows has determined that the driver for your device software is up-to-date.

  -----------------

  New report MGADiag after CHKDSK runs and the installation of the updates.

  Diagnostic report (1.9.0027.0):
  -----------------------------------------
  Validation of Windows data-->
  Validation status: genuine
  Validation code: 0
  Code of Validation caching online: 0x0
  Windows product key: *-* - F4GJK - KG77H-B9HD2
  The Windows Product Key hash: iJAth4TbScMi8HdcPurlASXdEkw =
  Windows product ID: 89578-OEM-7332157-00204
  Windows product ID type: 2
  Windows license Type: OEM SLP
  The Windows OS version: 6.0.6002.2.00010300.2.0.003
  ID: {A5A5B929-9AF8-43E5-A311-544A304C88A3} (3)
  Admin: Yes
  TestCab: 0x0
  LegitcheckControl ActiveX: N/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Product name: Windows Vista (TM) Home Premium
  Architecture: 0x00000000
  Build lab: 6002.vistasp2_gdr.110617 - 0336
  TTS error:
  Validation of diagnosis:
  Resolution state: n/a

  Given Vista WgaER-->
  ThreatID (s): n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Version: 6.0.6002.16398

  Windows XP Notifications data-->
  Cached result: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  File: No.
  Version: N/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  WgaTray.exe signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  WgaLogon.dll signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002

  OGA Notifications data-->
  Cached result: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Version: 2.0.48.0
  OGAExec.exe signed by: Microsoft
  OGAAddin.dll signed by: Microsoft

  OGA data-->
  Office status: 114 blocked VLK 2
  Microsoft Office XP Professional with FrontPage - 114 VLK blocked 2
  OGA Version: Registered, 2.0.48.0
  Signed by: Microsoft
  Office Diagnostics: 025D1FF3-364-80041010_025D1FF3-229-80041010_025D1FF3-230-1_025D1FF3-517-80040154_025D1FF3-237-80040154_025D1FF3-238-2_025D1FF3-244-80070002_025D1FF3-258-3

  Data browser-->
  Proxy settings: N/A
  User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Win32)
  Default browser: C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe
  Download signed ActiveX controls: fast
  Download unsigned ActiveX controls: disabled
  Run ActiveX controls and plug-ins: allowed
  Initialize and script ActiveX controls not marked as safe: disabled
  Allow the Internet Explorer Webbrowser control scripts: disabled
  Active scripting: allowed
  Recognized ActiveX controls safe for scripting: allowed

  Analysis of file data-->

  Other data-->
  Office details: {A5A5B929-9AF8-43E5-A311-544A304C88A3}1.9.0027.06.0.6002.2.00010300.2.0.003x 32*-*-*-*-B9HD289578-OEM-7332157-002042S-1-5-21-3777094449-617660858-91839038Dell Inc.. MM061                           Dell Inc.. A14 20070402000000.000000 + 00056303507018400FE04090409Central Standard Time(GMT-06:00)03DELL M07 114114Microsoft Office XP Professional with FrontPage104iCnywwNW1w4s9ukTIwGMGxyGic =54185-640-0000025-1798914 39476F84C4B4004

  Content Spsys.log: 0 x 80070002

  License data-->
  The software licensing service version: 6.0.6002.18005
  Name: Windows Vista, HomePremium edition
  Description: operating system Windows - Vista, channel OEM_SLP
  Activation ID: bffdc375-bbd5-499d-8ef1-4f37b61c895f
  ID of the application: 55c92734-d682-4d71-983e-d6ec3f16059f
  Extended PID: 89578-00146-321-500204-02-1033-6000.0000-1402007
  Installation ID: 007894240565911961931104634943657564676410030663392174
  Processor certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=43473
  The machine certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=43474
  Use license URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=43476
  Product key certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=43475
  Partial product key: B9HD2
  License status: licensed

  Windows Activation Technologies-->
  N/A

  --> HWID data
  Current HWID of Hash: OAAAAAEABQABAAEAAQABAAAAAwABAAEAJJRiENrxWFBy8jZ2jNDqTizZupDy9IwU5rIQVqxW9Eg =

  Activation 1.0 data OEM-->
  N/A

  Activation 2.0 data OEM-->
  BIOS valid for OA 2.0: Yes
  Windows marker version: 0 x 20000
  OEMID and OEMTableID consistent: Yes
  BIOS information:
  ACPI Table name OEMID value OEMTableID value
  APIC DELL M07
  FACP DELL M07
  HPET DELL M07
  STARTING DELL M07
  MCFG DELL M07
  M07 DELL SLIC
  SSDT PmRef CpuPm

  Hello

  You look at the statistics of SMART to see if the hard drive is a failure.
  http://mikemstech.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-to-detect-failing-hard-drive.html

  If he is not in default, you run chkdsk /f /r to ensure that bad sectors are marked. One way to do this forum works it offline.
  http://mikemstech.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-to-perform-offline-system-integrity.html

  If the disk is failed, you may need to save your data,

  http://mikemstech.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-to-rescue-files-from-damaged-system.html

• Bad LBAs appearing on newspaper

  Hi all

  I have a Dell PowerEdge 2900 which log shows bad LBA for physical disk 01. These bad LBAs have appeared in journal 02/11/16 at 02/16/16.

  In Dell OpenManage, everything has a green check marks.

  Here's a copy paste log controller showing the bad LBA:

  11/02/16 0:42:43: EVT #59094-02 / 11 / 16 0:42:43: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 22 97 3 a 00 00 08 00, meaning: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 0:42:43 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 22 97 3 b 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 0:42:43: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a08c5200 = 0
  11/02/16 0:42:43: MedErr is for: cmdId = ee, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba = 122973 a., cnt = 8, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 0:42:43: ErrLBAOffset (1) LBA(122973a) BadLba = 122973 b
  11/02/16 0:42:45: EVT #59095-02 / 11 / 16 0:42:45: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 22 97 3 a 00 00 08 00, meaning: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 0:42:45 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 22 97 3 b 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 0:42:45: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a0710600 = 0
  11/02/16 0:42:45: MedErr is for: cmdId = ee, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 1, lba = 122973 a., cnt = 8, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 0:42:45: ErrLBAOffset (1) LBA(122973a) BadLba = 122973 b
  11/02/16 0:42:45: EBB_RecoverReadErrors: question WV for pd = 01, lba = 122973b
  11/02/16 0:42:45: show writing check pd = 01, physArm = 1, span = 0, blk = 122973b
  11/02/16 0:42:45: EVT #59096-02 / 11 / 16 0:42:45: 110 = average error corrected during PD 01 (e0x20/s1) recovery to 122973 b
  11/02/16 16:37:14: EVT #59097-02 / 11 / 16 16:37:14: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, PEH: 2 a 00 00 f6 50 3 a 00 00 38 00, meaning: 3/0 c/00
  11/02/16 16:37:14: feel Raw for PD 1: f0 00 03 00 f6 50 60 0 a 00 00 00 00 00 01 80 00 89 0c
  11/02/16 16:37:14: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a0835600 = 0
  11/02/16 16:37:14: MedErr is for: cmdId = 41F, ld = 0, src = 7, cmd = 2, lba = f65000, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 16:37:14 :-> DelWrite: dirtyArms = 7, badPhys = ff - ff
  11/02/16 16:37:14: ErrLBAOffset (26) LBA (f6503a) BadLba = f65060
  11/02/16 16:37:14: writing MED ERR! ErrLBA (26) LBA (f6503a)
  11/02/16 18:13:24: EVT #59098-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:24: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c7 00 00 36 00 ca, meaning: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 18:13:24 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c7 db 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 18:13:24: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a068ca00 = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:24: MedErr is for: cmdId = 3df, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is 121c7ca, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:24: ErrLBAOffset (11) LBA (121c7ca) BadLba = 121c7db
  11/02/16 18:13:26: EVT #59099-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:26: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c7 00 00 36 00 ca, meaning: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 18:13:26 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c7 db 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 18:13:26: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a05cba00 = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:26: MedErr is for: cmdId = 3df, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 1, lba is 121c7ca, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:26: ErrLBAOffset (11) LBA (121c7ca) BadLba = 121c7db
  11/02/16 18:13:26: EBB_RecoverReadErrors: question WV for pd = 01, lba = 121c7db
  11/02/16 18:13:26: show writing check pd = 01, physArm = 1, span = 0, blk = 121c7db
  11/02/16 18:13:26: EVT #59100-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:26: 110 = average error corrected during PD 01 (e0x20/s1) recovery at 121c7db
  11/02/16 18:13:28: EVT #59101-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:28: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c9 00 00 00 4 a 00, feel: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 18:13:28 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c9 0 a 04 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 18:13:28: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a06cd000 = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:28: MedErr is for: cmdId = 173, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is 121c8ca, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:28: LBA (121c900) ErrLBAOffset BadLba (4) = 121 c 904
  11/02/16 18:13:29: EVT #59102-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:29: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c9 00 00 00 4 a 00, feel: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 18:13:29 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c9 0 a 04 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 18:13:29: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a076bc00 = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:29: MedErr is for: cmdId = 173, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 1, lba is 121c8ca, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 18:13:29: LBA (121c900) ErrLBAOffset BadLba (4) = 121 c 904
  11/02/16 18:13:29: EBB_RecoverReadErrors: question WV for pd = 01, lba = 121 c 904
  11/02/16 18:13:29: show writing check pd = 01, physArm = 1, span = 0, blk = 121 c 904
  11/02/16 18:13:30: EVT #59103-02 / 11 / 16 18:13:30: 110 = average error corrected during PD 01 (e0x20/s1) recovery to 121C 904
  11/02/16 18:40:20: EVT #59104-02 / 11 / 16 18:40:20: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 00 80 00 00 32 00 4th f6, feel: 11/03/00
  11/02/16 18:40:20 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 00 f6 4e 9 b 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  11/02/16 18:40:20: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a08f2400 = 0
  11/02/16 18:40:20: MedErr is for: cmdId = 80, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is f64e32, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 18:40:20: ErrLBAOffset (1B) LBA (f64e80) BadLba = f64e9b
  11/02/16 19:36:35: EVT #59105-02 / 11 / 16 19:36:35: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 2A 00 01 06 29 ca 00 00 36 00, meaning: 3/0 c/00
  11/02/16 19:36:35: feel Raw for PD 1: f0 00 03 01 06 29 d5 0 a 00 00 00 00 00 01 80 00 2nd 0c
  11/02/16 19:36:35: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a070fa00 = 0
  11/02/16 19:36:35: MedErr is for: cmdId = 426, ld = 0 src = 7, cmd = 2, lba = 1062980, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  11/02/16 19:36:35 :-> DelWrite: dirtyArms = 7, badPhys = ff - ff
  11/02/16 19:36:35: ErrLBAOffset (b) LBA(10629ca) BadLba = 10629 d 5
  11/02/16 19:36:35: writing MED ERR! ErrLBA (b) LBA(10629ca)
  12/02/16 02:33:11: EVT #59106-02 / 12 / 16 2:33:11: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 00 db 92 00 00 6F 00 d1, feel: 11/03/00
  12/02/16 02:33:11 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 00 db d1 a8 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  12/02/16 02:33:11: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a06e7000 = 0
  12/02/16 02:33:11: MedErr is for: cmdId = 4 d, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is dbd192, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  12/02/16 02:33:11: ErrLBAOffset (16) LBA (dbd192) BadLba = dbd1a8
  12/02/16 02:33:13: EVT #59107-02 / 12 / 16 2:33:13: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 00 db 92 00 00 6F 00 d1, feel: 11/03/00
  12/02/16 02:33:13 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 00 db d1 a7 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  12/02/16 02:33:13: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a0526000 = 0
  12/02/16 02:33:13: MedErr is for: cmdId = 4 d, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 1, lba is dbd192, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  12/02/16 02:33:13: ErrLBAOffset (15) LBA (dbd192) BadLba = dbd1a7
  12/02/16 02:33:13: EBB_RecoverReadErrors: question WV for pd = 01, lba = dbd1a7
  12/02/16 02:33:13: show writing check pd = 01, physArm = 1, span = 0, blk = dbd1a7
  12/02/16 02:33:13: EVT #59108-02 / 12 / 16 2:33:13: 110 = average error corrected during PD 01 (e0x20/s1) recovery at dbd1a7
  13/02/16 0:41:02: EVT #59109-02 / 13 / 16 0:41:02: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, PEH: 2 a 00 00 and 23 22 00 00 08 00 f5, meaning: 3/0 c/00
  13/02/16 0:41:02: feel Raw for PD 1: 00 03 00 23 f5 28 f0 0 a 00 00 00 00 00 01 80 00 89 0c
  13/02/16 0:41:02: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a06d7200 = 0
  13/02/16 0:41:02: MedErr is for: cmdId = 490, ld = 0 src = 7, cmd = 2, lba is 23f500, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  13/02/16 0:41:02 :-> DelWrite: dirtyArms = 7, badPhys = ff - ff
  13/02/16 0:41:02: ErrLBAOffset (6) LBA (23f522) BadLba = 23f528
  13/02/16 0:41:02: writing MED ERR! ErrLBA (6) LBA (23f522)
  13/02/16 01:59:33: EVT #59110-02 / 13 / 16 1:59:33: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c7 00 00 a2 feel 5th 00: 11/03/00
  13/02/16 01:59:33 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c7 cc 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  13/02/16 01:59:33: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a0800e00 = 0
  13/02/16 01:59:33: MedErr is for: cmdId = 26th, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is 121c7a2, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  13/02/16 01:59:33: BadLba LBA (121c7a2) ErrLBAOffset (2A) = 121c7cc
  13/02/16 01:59:35: EVT #59111-02 / 13 / 16 1:59:35: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 21 c7 00 00 a2 feel 5th 00: 11/03/00
  13/02/16 01:59:35 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 21 c7 cc 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  13/02/16 01:59:35: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a0734e00 = 0
  13/02/16 01:59:35: MedErr is for: cmdId = 26th, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 1, lba is 121c7a2, cnt = 80, rmwOp = 0
  13/02/16 01:59:35: ErrLBAOffset (2A) LBA (121c7a2) BadLba = 121c7cc
  13/02/16 01:59:35: EBB_RecoverReadErrors: question WV for pd = 01, lba = 121c7cc
  13/02/16 01:59:35: show writing check pd = 01, physArm = 1, span = 0, blk = 121c7cc
  13/02/16 01:59:35: EVT #59112-02 / 13 / 16 1:59:35: 110 = average error corrected during PD 01 (e0x20/s1) recovery at 121c7cc
  16/02/16 18:01:53: #59113-02 EVT / 16 / 16 18:01:53: 113 = feel unexpected: PD 01 (e0x20/s1) path 5000c5003997d5b5, CDB: 28 00 01 05 d7 b2 00 00 00 4F, feel: 11/03/00
  16/02/16 18:01:53 : sens Raw pour PD 1 : f0 00 03 01 05 d7 e3 0 a 00 00 00 00 11 00 81 80 00 97
  16/02/16 18:01:53: DEV_REC:Medium Error DevId [1] retired Tgt 1 RDM = a07e8400 = 0
  16/02/16 18:01:53: MedErr is for: cmdId = 22 b, ld = 0, src = 1, cmd = 11, lba is 105d7b2, cnt = 50, rmwOp = 0
  16/02/16 18:01:53: ErrLBAOffset (31) LBA (105d7b2) BadLba = 105d7e3

  I intend keeping an eye on the controller log and running an analysis of consistency check soon.

  Don't you think that the disc is a failure?

  Thanks for the help!

  Hello.

  Looks like the average of errors on the existing LBA on the PD 01 have been corrected. Ensure that the controller and the drives hard firmware is up to date. Go head check consistency, a race of diagnoses and a review for more information.

• U2415 - two connections for Display Port

  This is my first contact with Dell support and the first time I use the interface of the RFP.

  My question will appear in some basic way a lot of people, but I'm confused by the fact that my new monitor is equipped with a cable, which I assume is the only one, I really need to connect. However, the documentation does not confirm it.

  On the contraryt, there are two connectors on the monitor that are commented out using the interface to display, but with a different connector port. It's confusing and the documentation is only adding more confusion.

  Do I need a cable only? I got a cable with on one side a marked connector of the symbol "monitor - like".

  If so, I don't understand the purpose of providing two types of connectors and the need for an explanation (bad), not yet available in Dutch!

  Port numbers are 4-5 on page 10

  Thank you

  If your computer graphics card has the size DP (DisplayPort) out, to connect like this =
  RFP computer on--> Dell DP to the CDM cable--> U2415 CDM in

  If your computer graphics card has the mini size CDM (Mini DisplayPort) out, to connect like this =
  Computer AMD at--> Dell mDP to DP--> DP U2415 cable in

  Why we offer both? If the end user can daisy chain multiple monitors. As explained on page 27. Or connect two computers to the same screen using these different ports.

  For Belgium, the language is french.

• U2415 - when I changed the monitor upside down I hear something like a screw wandering inside.

  Greetings from the Greece. I apologize for my bad English. Has just delivered my new u2415. But when I turn the monitor upside down, there is something like a screw that moves from one side of the screen to the other.  The monitor works perfectly when it is plugged. The warranty covers replacement with a new or not? Or just a new one?

  Policy of Dell on monitor to nine = trade
  * If the monitor Exchange is configured within the first 30 days of the date of the original invoice, the replacement will be New
  * If the monitor Exchange is configured outside the first 30 days of the date of the original invoice, the replacement will be refurbished

• Windows needs to repeatedly check consistency D even if nothing is wrong

  I have several SSD and HD, including C (SSD) and D (HD).  At least several times a month, from the start, I get the black screen indicating that d should be checked for consistency.  This has happened for nearly two years.  Sometimes I let him check D and Windows should NEVER found a problem with it.

  Why this Dungeon is happening and how to get Windows to stopy hurt seeing D as needing to be checked?

  Hello

  Welcome to the Microsoft community. I will certainly help you to question. This problem occurs because of the corruption in the registry or when chkdsk runs at startup.

  Important: When running chkdsk on the drive if bad sectors are found on the disk hard when chkdsk attempts to repair this area if all available on which data can be lost.

  Open command prompt high by following the instructions below:

  1. Open the start menu and type cmd.
  2. Right-click on the command prompt and click "run as administrator"
  3. Click Yes at the prompt of the UAC.

  Once the open command prompt, follow the instructions below:

  To disable CHKDSK from startup using the on command chkntfs /x switch in command prompt. The /x switch will exclude a verification by default startup car. If you have drive C: as your hard drive, then the command to disable chkdsk C: drive analysis would be:

  chkntfs /x c:

  Since you have 2 disk, C and D, you can disable chkdsk with the command below

  chkntfs /x c: d:

  Hope this information was useful. Let us know the results once you have tried the following steps.

  Thank you

• Check the disk for consistency

  I read messages will this question hide two to five years. I guess my problem is the same: black screen on startup with white 'BACK', writes, "one of your disks needs to be checked for consistency. You can cancel the disk check, but it is strongly recommended that you continue. Windows will now check the disk. "What has happened three times in the last two months, and nothing was found in the mess at the end of the audit.

  Responses to previous posts are frankly discouraging - at least for me. I want to know is if this disk check is a signal that all is not well with the computer, or if it's just a gene that will probably calm down. Would it not be in my interest to call a repairman? I'm not interested in venturing into the only registry.

  Thank you.

  There is nothing remarkable or unusual in the chkdsk report, no bad sectors or the reported bad clusters.  Run the utility of diagnosis of the constructor on the drive and see if it reports disk problems, go to the web site of the manufacturer of the drive for the utility.

  John

• The RV042 502 Bad Gateway CGI was not CGI/1.1 compatible

  Hello

  I have half a dozen routers RV042 in various places.  They are running v4.0.0.07.  Apparently at random, I had the

  502 bad Gateway

  The CGI/1.1 CGI was not consistent.

  error when you try to connect to the web interface with google chrome (even with IE too).  This is happening on the side LAN.  I actually didn't notice until my software Opsview monitoring threw up a critical when he did get an http response.

  The router otherwise actually works very well.

  Since the first occurrence, several of my routers have developed the same error.

  I have tried different browsers, clear caches, although I'm not surprised that these efforts were in vain, because clearly there is a problem even when no browser is involved (nagios).  Nagios http checking also returns a 502 Bad Gateway.

  I guess that a reboot is in order, but I'm looking for other explanations/solutions before having to restart because I would like to avoid that if possible.  If I can help more, please let me know.

  Thanks for the help.

  I know you are trying to avoid a reboot, but I would try and see if the problem goes away.  The rv series starts acting funky when they have not been restarted for awhile.

• transaction tables consistent reads - undo records applied

  Hello

  on 11.2.0.4 on Linux

  In the documentation, it is said:

  The report of the following V$SYSSTAT statistics should be close to a:

  ratio = transaction tables consistent reads - undo records applied / transaction tables consistent read rollbacks 

  And the recommendation is that the recommended solution is to use automatic undo management...

  We are in automatic cancellation, but the ratio is 38:

  SQL > show Cancel parameter

  VALUE OF TYPE NAME

  ------------------------------------ ----------- --------

  UNDO_MANAGEMENT string AUTO

  SELECT name, value of V$ SYSSTAT whose name in ("transaction tables consistent reads - undo records applied",

  ("tables of compatible transactions read restorations")

  NAME

  VALUE

  ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------

  transaction tables consistent reads - undo records applied	38
  operating tables consistent read recommitments	1

  2 selected lines

  So, what would be the reasons and the solution?

  Thank you.

  This is a good demonstration of why it's a bad idea to blindly follow the ratios.

  Once since your instance starts, you had to use 38 undo records to discover the time of validation of a specific transaction. The performance impact of that verification is virtually invisible - worst case, it is you read 38 undo disk blocks to get the necessary information.  All you have is an example where a query ran long enough so that a few hundred to a few thousands of transactions were hiding at the time of a transaction that committed at the same time that the query started - try to 'solve the problem' is a waste of time.

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis