understand row_number() and its use in analytic function

Similar Questions

• Using the analytic function

  Oracle 11g Release 2

  I'm assuming that the best solution is the use of analytical functions.

  create table test3
  ( part_type_id  varchar2(50)
  ,group_id      number
  ,part_desc_id  number
  ,part_cmt      varchar2(50)
  )
  /
  
  insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',1,10,'comment1');
  insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',1,10,'comment2');
  insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',2,15,'comment1');
  insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',2,15,'comment2');
  insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment3');
  insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment4');
  insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment5');
  insert into test3 values( 'XYZ123',1,10,'comment6');
  insert into test3 values( 'XYZ123',2,15,'comment7');
  commit;
  
  select * from test3;
  
  PART_TYPE_ID           GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID PART_CMT
  -------------------- ---------- ------------ --------------------
  ABC123                        1           10 comment1
  ABC123                        1           10 comment2
  ABC123                        2           15 comment1
  ABC123                        2           15 comment2
  EDG123                        25          75 comment3
  EDG123                        25          75 comment4
  EDG123                        25          75 comment5
  XYZ123                        1           10 comment6
  XYZ123                        2           15 comment7
  
  9 rows selected.
  
  Desired output:
  
  PART_TYPE_ID           GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID PART_CMT
  -------------------- ---------- ------------ --------------------
  ABC123                        1           10 comment1 
  ABC123                        2           15 comment1
  XYZ123                        1           10 comment1
  XYZ123                        2           15 comment2
  
  RULE: where one part_type_id has multiple (2 or more distinct combinations) of group_id/part_desc_id
  
  NOTE: There are about 12 columns in the table, for brevity I only included 4.
  
  
  
  

  Post edited by: orclrunner was updated desired output and rule

  Hello

  Here's one way:

  WITH got_d_count AS

  (

  SELECT part_type_id, group_id, part_desc_id

  MIN (part_cmt) AS min_part_cmt

  COUNT AS d_count (*) OVER (PARTITION BY part_type_id)

  OF test3

  GROUP BY part_type_id, group_id, part_desc_id

  )

  SELECT DISTINCT

  group_id, part_desc_id, part_type_id, min_part_cmt

  OF got_d_count

  WHERE d_count > 1

  ;

  Output:

  GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID MIN_PART_CMT PART_TYPE_ID

  ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------

  ABC123 1 10 comment1

  ABC123 2 15 comment1

  XYZ123 1 10 comment6

  XYZ123 2 15 comment7

  Analytical functions, such as the COUNTY and MIN, many global versions, in addition, it can give the same results.  Use the analytical versions when each row of output corresponds to exactly 1 row of input and the aggregate and GROUP BY version when each line of output corresponds to a group of lines 1 or more input.  In this issue, each line of output appears to be a group of input lines having the same group_id, part_type_id, and part_desc_id (I'm guessing just, this only has never stated), so I used GROUP BY to get 1 row of output for every input lines.

• SQL using the analytic function

  
  Hi all

  I want a help in the creation of my SQL query to retrieve the data described below:

  I have a test of sample table containing data as below:

  State ID Desc

  MICHAEL 1 T1

  ACTIVE 2 T2

  T3 3 SUCCESS

  DISABLE THE T4 4

  The thing I want to do is to select all the lines with an ACTIVE status in the table but is there is no ACTIVE status, my request will give me the last line with MICHAEL status.

  I can do this in a single request by using the analytical function for example, if yes can yiu help me on the request of unpacking.

  Kind regards

  Raluce

  Something like that?

  I had to fix it.

  with testdata until)
  Select 1 id, "T1" dsc "DISABLED" status of Union double all the
  Select 2 id, 'T2' dsc, the status "ACTIVE" of all the double union
  Select id 3, "T3" dsc, the status of 'SUCCESS' of all the double union
  Select 4 id, "T4" dsc "DISABLED" status of double
  )

  Select
  ID
  dsc
  status
  of testdata
  where
  status =
  -case when (select count (*) in testdata where status = 'ACTIVE') > 0
  then 'ACTIVE '.
  Another 'DISABLED '.
  end
  and)
  ID in (select id from testdata where status = ' ACTIVE')
  or
  ID = (select max (id) in testdata when status = 'DISABLED')
  )

  STATE ID DSC

  '2' 'T2' 'ACTIVE '.

  Maybe it's more efficient

  Select
  ID
  dsc
  status
  of testdata
  where
  status =
  -case when (select count (*) in testdata where status = 'ACTIVE') > 0
  then 'ACTIVE '.
  Another 'DISABLED '.
  end
  and
  ID =)
  -case when (select count (*) in testdata where status = 'ACTIVE') > 0
  then id
  on the other
  (select max (id) in testdata when status = 'DISABLED')
  end
  )

  Post edited by: correction of chris227

  Post edited by: chris227
  extended

• Use of analytic functions

  Hi gurus,
  I ask someone to enlighten me on the analytical functions.
  I used the following query:

  select * from 
  (select filename,count(regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'))over(  partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') ) cnt
   FROM 
  l_x12n_835_fileinfo where partitionnum=76000 and clntsysnum=76500 and radt>='01-JAN-2010')
  where cnt>1

  The sample result set is:

  FILENAME     CNT
  
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.1     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.3     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.1     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.1     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.3     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.1     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.2     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era     4

  Now, I changed the query to:

  select * from 
  (select filename,count(regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'))over(  partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') order by filename   ) cnt
   FROM 
  l_x12n_835_fileinfo where partitionnum=76000 and clntsysnum=76500 and radt>='01-JAN-2010')
  where cnt>1

  The result set has been

  FILENAME     CNT
  
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.1     2
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.3     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.1     2
  rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.1     2
  rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.1     2
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.2     3
  rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.3     4
  rsmedcalwa.20100112.chpwr.175.era.1     2
  rsmedcalwa.20100112.chpwr.175.era.2     3

  (1) I don't understand how the addition of the order by clause changes the count. Could someone explain please?
  When I change this order by order of regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'), it gives me the correct number.
  
  My requirement is to check how many similar file names I.
  
  (2) if there are any other better elsewhere, please let me know.

  Hello

  Analytical functions still carried on in a window of the the result set, which can be smaller than the result set.
  If you have a PARTITION BY clause, the window for each row includes rows with the same values from all the PARTITION BY expressions.
  If you have an ORDER BY clause, the window includes that of a section of consecutive lines in the score, as defined by a windowing clause (in other words, LINES or KEEP them). The default value is "RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND LINE CURRENT.

  In your case, if the analytical clause is:

  over(  partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') )
  

  and the line you are looking at a filename = 'rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2', the window takes up the entire partition, in other words, all lines whose name includes "rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era". In other words, the window is identical to the partition, because theree is no ORDER BY clause.

  But if you add an ORDER BY clause:

  over(  partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') order by filename   )
  

  then the window (potentially) decreases. Since there is no clause window, the default value 'RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECDING AND a CURRENT LINE' is used, which means that only the lines with a lower or equal to "rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2" file name (using the normal string comparison) will affect the results.

  The analytical ORDER BY clause is required for certain features (such as ROW_NUMBER) significance only in regard to certain commands. For the most part fucntions (including COUNTY), the ORDER BY clause is optional, and you do not have to use a. In this case, it seems that you do not want the effect of a smaller than the partition window, just so, do not use an ORDER byclause of Analytics for this function.

  Remember, the analytical ORDER byclause is completely independent the ORDER BY query clause. If you want the result presented in a certain order, use an ORDER BY clause at the end of the query. It will not change the results of the analytical functions.

• How to achieve this using an analytic function - please help

  version 10g.
  This code works very well with my requirement. I'm tyring learn analytical functions and implement than in the query below. I tried to use row_number,
  but I could nt achieve the desired results. Please give me some ideas.
  
  

  SELECT c.tax_idntfctn_nmbr irs_number, c.legal_name irs_name,
         f.prvdr_lctn_iid
    FROM tax_entity_detail c,
         provider_detail e,
         provider_location f,
         provider_location_detail pld
   WHERE c.tax_entity_sid = e.tax_entity_sid
     AND e.prvdr_sid = f.prvdr_sid
     AND pld.prvdr_lctn_iid = f.prvdr_lctn_iid
     AND c.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
     AND c.status_cid = 2
     AND e.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
     AND e.status_cid = 2
     AND (c.from_date) =
            (SELECT MAX (c1.from_date)
               FROM tax_entity_detail c1
              WHERE c1.tax_entity_sid = c.tax_entity_sid
                AND c1.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
                AND c1.status_cid = 2)
     AND (e.from_date) =
            (SELECT MAX (c1.from_date)
               FROM provider_detail c1
              WHERE c1.prvdr_sid = e.prvdr_sid
                AND c1.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
                AND c1.status_cid = 2)
     AND pld.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
     AND pld.status_cid = 2
     AND (pld.from_date) =
            (SELECT MAX (a1.from_date)
               FROM provider_location_detail a1
              WHERE a1.prvdr_lctn_iid = pld.prvdr_lctn_iid
                AND a1.oprtnl_flag = 'A'
                AND a1.status_cid = 2)

  Thank you
  
  Published by: new learner on May 24, 2010 07:53
  
  Published by: new learner on May 24, 2010 10:50

  Can be like that not tested...

  Select *.
  Of
  (

  SELECT c.tax_idntfctn_nmbr irs_number, c.legal_name irs_name,
  f.prvdr_lctn_iid, c.from_date as c_from_date, max (c.from_date) more (partition c.tax_entity_sid) as max_c_from_date,
  e.from_date as e_from_date, max (e.from_date) more (partition e.prvdr_sid) as max_e_from_date,
  PLD.from_date as pld_from_date, max (pld.from_date) more (pld.prvdr_lctn_iid partition) as max_pld_from_date

  OF tax_entity_detail c,.
  e provider_detail
  provider_location f,
  LDP provider_location_detail
  WHERE c.tax_entity_sid = e.tax_entity_sid
  AND e.prvdr_sid = f.prvdr_sid
  AND pld.prvdr_lctn_iid = f.prvdr_lctn_iid
  AND c.oprtnl_flag = 'A '.
  AND c.status_cid = 2
  AND e.oprtnl_flag = 'A '.
  AND e.status_cid = 2
  AND pld.oprtnl_flag = 'A '.
  AND pld.status_cid = 2

  ) X
  where c_from_date = max_c_from_date AND e_from_date = max_e_from_date AND
  pld_from_date = max_pld_from_date

• Nth salary using the analytic function

  I use under function to calculate second highest with empno and deptno salary.

  Is it possible to get the same result with another query without using Assembly only analytical functions condition.using and windows function is possible to get the desired output?

  SELECT e.empno,

  e.DEPTNO,

  tmp. SAL as second_higher_salary

  FROM emp e,.

  (SELECT Empno,

  DEPTNO,

  SAL,

  DENSE_RANK() (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER of sal) AS rnk

  WCP

  ) tmp

  WHERE tmp.deptno = e.deptno

  and tmp.rnk = 2

  EMPNO DEPTNO SAL

  ---------- ---------- ----------

  7934 10 2450

  7782 10 2450

  7839 10 2450

  7876 20 1100

  7369 20 1100

  7902 20 1100

  7788 20 1100

  7566 20 1100

  7900 30 1250

  7844 30 1250

  7654 30 1250

  7521 30 1250

  7499 30 1250

  7698 30 1250

  7900 30 1250

  7844 30 1250

  7654 30 1250

  7521 30 1250

  7499 30 1250

  7698 30 1250

  Here's my solution:

  Select empno,

  DEPTNO,

  FIRST_VALUE (sal) (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER by sal desc)

  de)

  SELECT EmpNo,

  DEPTNO,

  Decode (DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY deptno order by sal desc), 1,-sal, sal) sal

  WCP

  )

  /

  EMPNO

  DEPTNO FIRST_VALUE (SAL) OVER (PARTITIONBYDEPTNOORDERBYSALDESC)

  ---------- ---------- -----------------------------------------------------

  	7782	10	2450
  	7934	10	2450
  	7839	10	2450
  	7566	20	2975
  	7876	20	2975
  	7369	20	2975
  	7788	20	2975
  	7902	20	2975
  	7499	30	1600
  	7844	30	1600
  	7654	30	1600
  	7521	30	1600
  	7900	30	1600
  	7698	30	1600

• Determine the maximum length of a column and its use in the same query?

  I would like to determine the maximum length of a column and use it in the same query. Is this possible? IE:
  
  SELECT RPAD (last_name, SELECT MAX (LENGTH (last_name)) + 5 FROM user, '-')
  OF the user.
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Welcome to the forum!

  jfraley wrote:
  I would like to determine the maximum length of a column and use it in the same query. Is this possible? IE:

  SELECT RPAD (last_name, SELECT MAX (LENGTH (last_name)) + 5 FROM user, '-')
  OF the user.

  Thank you

  Sure. You almost go in your message: a scalar subquery . Just put brackets around the subquery:

  SELECT      RPAD ( last_name
            , (
               SELECT  MAX (LENGTH (last_name)) + 5
               FROM    user_tbl          -- USER is not a good table name
              )
            , '-'
            )          AS padded_last_name
  FROM      user_tbl
  ;
  

  Scalar subqueries in SQL are like tape in your garage in canvas: they are used for thousands of different things and open, maybe 1% of them. Usually, there are better ways to achieve the same results, such as the analytical functions:

  SELECT      RPAD ( last_name
            , 5 + MAX (LENGTH (last_name)) OVER ()
            , '-'
            )          AS padded_last_name
  FROM      user_tbl
  ;
  

  Still another way is to make the subquery and then join his game as if it were a table of results:

  WITH     got_max_length     AS
  (
       SELECT     MAX (LENGTH (last_name))     AS max_length
       FROM     user_tbl
  )
  SELECT      RPAD ( u.last_name
            , m.max_length + 5
            , '-'
            )          AS padded_last_name
  FROM           user_tbl     u
  CROSS JOIN     got_max_length     m
  ;
  

  Published by: Frank Kulash, December 12, 2011 21:17
  Added cross join example

• by using the analytical function to get the right output.

  Hello all;
  
  I have the following date of sample below
  

  create table temp_one
  (
         id number(30),   
        placeid varchar2(400),
        issuedate  date,
        person varchar2(400),
        failures number(30),
        primary key(id)
  );
  
  insert into temp_one values (1, 'NY', to_date('03/04/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'John', 3);
  
  insert into temp_one values (2, 'NY', to_date('03/03/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'Adam', 7);
  
  insert into temp_one values (3, 'Mexico', to_date('03/04/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'Wendy', 3);
  
  insert into temp_one values (4, 'Mexico', to_date('03/14/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'Gerry', 3);
  
  insert into temp_one values (5, 'Mexico', to_date('03/15/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'Zick', 9);
  
  insert into temp_one values (6, 'London', to_date('03/16/2011', 'MM/DD/YYYY'), 'Mike', 8);

  It's the output I want
  

  placeid       issueperiod                               failures
  NY              02/28/2011 - 03/06/2011          10
  Mexico       02/28/2011 - 03/06/2011           3
  Mexico        03/14/2011 - 03/20/2011          12
  London        03/14/2011 - 03/20/2011          8

  Any help is appreciated. I'll post my request as soon as I can think of a good logic for this...

  Hello

  user13328581 wrote:
  ... Please note, I'm still learning how to use analytical functions.

  It doesn't matter; analytical functions will not help in this problem. The SUM aggregate function is all you need.
  But what do you need to GROUP BY? What is the value of each row of the result will represent? A placeid? Yes, each line will represent only placedid, but it will be divided further. You want a separate line of the output for each placeid and every week, then you'll want of the week and GROUP BY placeid. You don't want to GROUP BY the raw issuedate; that would put on 3 March and 4 March in separate groups. And you don't want to GROUP BY failures; This would mean that a line with 3 failures could never be in the same group in line with 9 failures.

  This becomes the output you posted from the sample data you posted:

  SELECT       placeid
  ,             TO_CHAR ( TRUNC (issuedate, 'IW')
                , 'MM/DD/YYYY'
              ) || ' - '|| TO_CHAR ( TRUNC (issuedate, 'IW') + 6
                                           , 'MM/DD/YYY'
                             )     AS issueperiod
  ,       SUM (failures)                  AS sumfailures
  FROM        temp_one
  GROUP BY  placeid
  ,            TRUNC (issuedate, 'IW')
  ;
  

  You can use a subquery to calculate TRUNC (issuedate, 'IW') once. The code would be of about as complicated, efficiency probably will not improve substantially and the results would be the same.

• [8i] can I use an analytical function, or do I need a subquery?

  Hi all...
  
  This should be a quick. I hope I can solve my problem with an analytic function, but I don't know if it's possible. Can I use a subquery if I have to, but I'd really rather not.
  
  Here is a very simple version of what I'm trying to do:
  

  CREATE TABLE     test123
  (     field1          VARCHAR2(10)
  ,     field2          VARCHAR2(10)
  ,     my_date          DATE
  );
  
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value1', 'a',TO_DATE('12/31/1900','mm/dd/yyyy'));
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value1', 'b',TO_DATE('01/02/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'));
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value1', 'c',TO_DATE('01/05/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'));
  
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value2', 'a',TO_DATE('12/31/1900','mm/dd/yyyy'));
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value2', 'b',TO_DATE('01/01/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'));
  INSERT INTO     test123
  VALUES     ('value2', 'c',TO_DATE('01/15/2010','mm/dd/yyyy'));

  I want the results:

  FIELD1     FIELD2
  --------------
  value2     a
  value2     b
  value2     c
  value1     a
  value1     b
  value1     c

  I started with the following query:

  SELECT     field1
  ,          field2
  FROM     test123
  ORDER BY     MIN(my_date)     OVER     (
                                               PARTITION BY     field1
                                               )                                -- removed DESC here
  ,               field2

  But the problem is the database has a date of 31 December 1900 ' as default / initial for any date field. I don't want these default values taken into account in my calculation of min. I tried to put a WHERE clause in my analytical function [WHERE my_date <>TO_DATE (' 12/31/1900 ',' mm/dd/yyyy')], but I kept getting an error message "missing right parenthesis", so it seems that you can not have a WHERE clause here... or I'm just something wrong?
  
  Moreover, it is a 8i database...
  
  Edited by: user11033437 may 20, 2010 17:16: took the 'DESC' criteria out of my order by clause. In my real application, I need DESC, but not the example.

  Hello

  A WHERE clause excludes rows in the results set. Whenever you want you can have a WHERE clause that was more limited (for example, something that would simply exclude MIN calculating values in the ORDER BY clause), then think CASE:

  SELECT       field1
  ,       field2
  FROM       test123
  ORDER BY  MIN ( CASE
                WHEN  my_date > TO_DATE ( '12/31/1900'
                               , 'MM/DD/YYYY'
                               )
                THEN  my_date
            END
             )     OVER     (PARTITION BY     field1)      DESC
  ,       field2
  ;
  

  This puts the lines for "Value1" first.
  The minimum my_date for "Value1" (after excluding the values of 1900) is later than the minimum for "Value2", so I think that you either made a mistake in the desired output, or you do not want sorted by descending order.

  As always, thanks for the display of the data of the sample and the results so clearly.

• Using the analytical function.

  Hello
  
  I have this scenario.
  

  with t as 
  (
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,100 bulk_available,12122 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,2775 bulk_available,8704 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,524 bulk_available,15614 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,3300 bulk_available,15654 bulk_locator_id
  from dual)
  select  t.* from t;

  We have two locations for a given item_id. Primary and in bulk.
  
  I'm trying to get a select statement out of this point of view, where I will be restock the primary AMOUNT of sites in bulk, BUT the smaller bulk first. Once she gets up, I shouldn't take more product.
  
  There is an analytic function that would do this?
  
  That's the max I could come up with.
  

  with t as 
  (
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,100 bulk_available,12122 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,2775 bulk_available,8704 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,524 bulk_available,15614 bulk_locator_id 
  from dual union all
  select 21009 item_id,9 primary_available,450 max_qty,3300 bulk_available,15654 bulk_locator_id
  from dual)
  select  t.*, max_qty -
                 (primary_available + SUM(bulk_available)
                  over(PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY bulk_available)) replen_this_much 
                  from t;

  So, in this scenario, I want to replen bulk_locator_id 100 ' 12122 'and ' 15614 bulk_locator_id 341'. That's all. ZERO of the other rentals (bulk_locator_id). If the question is not clear, please let me know.
  
  Published by: RPuttagunta on September 11, 2009 16:23

  Hello

  Thanks for posting the sample data.
  It would be useful that you also posted the output you want. Is this?

  .                                 BULK_         REPLEN_
  ITEM_ PRIMARY_   MAX_  BULK_      LOCATOR_        THIS_
  ID    AVAILABLE  QTY   AVAILABLE  ID               MUCH
  ----- ---------- ----- ---------- ---------- ----------
  21009 9          450   100        12122             100
  21009 9          450   524        15614             341
  21009 9          450   2775       8704                0
  21009 9          450   3300       15654               0
  

  If so, you can get to this:

  SELECT       t.*
  ,       GREATEST ( 0
               , LEAST ( TO_NUMBER (bulk_available)
                       , TO_NUMBER (max_qty)
                      - ( TO_NUMBER (primary_available)
                        + NVL ( SUM (TO_NUMBER (bulk_available))
                                OVER ( PARTITION BY  item_id
                                       ORDER BY      TO_NUMBER (bulk_available)
                                 ROWS BETWEEN  UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
                                   AND      1           PRECEDING
                               )
                           , 0
                           )
                        )
                    )
               ) AS replen_this_much
  FROM       t
  ORDER BY  item_id
  ,            TO_NUMBER (bulk_available)
  ;
  

  You should really store your numbers in NUMBER of columns.

  You essentially posted all what you need analytical functions. The problem was just wrapping this analytical function (or something very close to it) and LESS and more GRAND, so that the replen_this_much column is always between 0 and TO_NUMBER (bulk_available).

• By using the analytical function to sort without showing this column in the result.

  Hello

  We use the Oracle 11.2

  How to use Oracle Analytics to sort the output of a query without showing this column in the result?

  Here's my query:

  Select distinct nvl(SRC_CHR_NM,'0') | » #'|| NVL(EXPL_SRC,'0') | » #'|| NVL(DIM_NM,'0') | » #'|| NVL(DIM_CHR_NM,'0') | » #'|| NVL(DIM_CHR_ABR,'0') | » #'||

  Decode (InStr (NVL(SRC_COL_NM,'0'), 'trim ('),'1 ', Replace (NVL(SRC_COL_NM,'0'),'trim (',' trim(PRM_DTL.'), '0',' PRM_DTL.)))) » || NVL(SRC_COL_NM,'0')) AS ALLOFIT,

  DIM_NM

  from EXPL_CONFIG where SBJ_AREA_CD = 'PRMDTL. '

  I want to use analytical to sort by DIM_NM but I do not want to show. I want to just just the ALLOFIT column to show in the output.

  Something like "row_number() over (order by DIM_NM desc).

  Thank you!

  Hello

  If you SELECT SEPARATE, then you can only ORDER OF things in the SELECT clause. (Do you really need to do SELECT DISTINCT?  Often, it's just an inefficient way to remove the lines that do not need to be there at all).

  Move making the SELECT DISTINCT in a subquery and make the ORDER BY (and nothing else) in the main query.

  I hope that answers your question.

  If this isn't the case, please post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) and also publish outcomes from these data.

  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.

  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002

• Re: How to change its use of the function keys?

  The function keys on my laptop P870 are keys to double action. You must press the FN key at the same time as the key function F1, F2. In particular, I use the F2 key a lot but have to use 2 hands (unless you have extremely long fingers) to operate the function keys driving me crazy.

  Any suggestions?

  If you use open Office assist Win8 > system settings > keyboard and function keys mode change.
  Change of cell function special mode reboot and test how it works.

• make changes to a file, I don't create and now used to the function key

  I had to change the dimensions of the file so I am not changing the button actions.  So, it worked before, and now im in CC host trying to get it to work again.  Any ideas how to check where the url I need to go to url google.org

  Here's the AS3

  to import flash.external.ExternalInterface;

  // =========================== CLICKTAG STUFF ==================================

  // =============================================================================

  ct.addEventListener (MouseEvent.CLICK, handleClick);

  ct.addEventListener (MouseEvent.ROLL_OVER, handleMouseOver);

  ct.addEventListener (MouseEvent.ROLL_OUT, handleMouseOut);

  function handleClick(e:MouseEvent):void {}

  ExternalInterface.call("saveglobalscore",score) ("ctaClick");

  trace ("clicked... clicktag");

  / * var flashVars:Object = LoaderInfo (this.root.loaderInfo) .parameters;

  If {(flashVars.clickTag)

  navigateToURL (new URLRequest (flashVars.clickTag), "_blank");

  }

  trace ("clicked"); * /

  }

  function handleMouseOver(e:MouseEvent):void {}

  cta.cta.gotoAndPlay ("OVER");

  cta.gotoAndPlay ("over");

  }

  function handleMouseOut(e:MouseEvent):void {}

  cta.gotoAndPlay ("out");

  }

  do not change the fla.

  Use the original html code and change the object tag:

  width = "550" height = "400" id = 'test' style = "float: none;" ' vertical-align: middle ">

• Using SQL analytic functions

  Thanks in advance to anyone who might help
  
  I am writing a storage report. Try to calculate the use of space over a period of time. I need for a db_nm, tblsp_nm find the collections of the first and the last, and then find the difference in the space_used
  
  The structure of the table is like this
  

  drop table tstg
  /
  create table tstg (db_nm varchar(10),
                    tblsp_nm varchar(15),
                    space_used number,
                    collection_time date)
  /
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSTEM',100,to_date('01/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSTEM',120,to_date('05/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSTEM',150,to_date('10/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSAUX',10,to_date('01/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSAUX',12,to_date('05/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  insert into tstg values ( 'EDW', 'SYSAUX',15,to_date('10/07/2011','DD/MM/YYYY'));
  commit;

  Expected result is
  

  DB_NM      TBLSP_NM        SPACE_USED COLLECTIO       DIFF
  ---------- --------------- ---------- --------- ----------
  EDW        SYSAUX                  15      10-JUL-11          5
  EDW        SYSTEM                 150      10-JUL-11         50

  I use
  

  select db_nm,tblsp_nm,space_used,collection_time,
  last_value(space_used) OVER (partition by DB_NM,Tblsp_nm order by collection_time ASC) -
  first_value(space_used) OVER (partition by DB_NM,Tblsp_nm order by collection_time ASC) diff
  from
  tstg

  but gives more lines in the result I want

  DB_NM      TBLSP_NM        SPACE_USED COLLECTIO       DIFF
  ---------- --------------- ---------- --------- ----------
  EDW        SYSAUX                  10      01-JUL-11          0
  EDW        SYSAUX                  12      05-JUL-11          2
  EDW        SYSAUX                  15      10-JUL-11          5
  EDW        SYSTEM                 100      01-JUL-11          0
  EDW        SYSTEM                 120      05-JUL-11         20
  EDW        SYSTEM                 150      10-JUL-11         50

  /
  
  
  Thank you
  Eduardo

  Hello

  Thanks for the sample data.

  Here's a solution using the FIRST/LAST functions:

  select db_nm
       , tblsp_nm
       , max(collection_time) as collection_time
       , max(space_used) keep (dense_rank last order by collection_time) as space_used
       , max(space_used) keep (dense_rank last order by collection_time)
         - max(space_used) keep (dense_rank first order by collection_time) as diff
  from tstg
  group by db_nm
         , tblsp_nm
  ;
  

• Warning quota IMAP but I have cleaned already and its use is very low

  I get a warning of Quota IMAP (101%) on one of my gmail email accounts.
  I read the articles on cleaning and avoid Quota IMAP problems and have done what I can delete and move e-mails.
  But my space usage report shows that I use only 36MB for this account which seems really small.
  (my main Gmail account using 8.8 GB and I do not receive a warning.)

  what I missed or where can I turn?

  Peter

  Gmail will also save all e-mails, both sent and received in 'all mail '.

  Deletion of an e-mail from a folder does not result removes the email in "all mail".

  Basically, all letters, incoming and outgoing are saved in the folder "all messages".
  Labels can be applied to create a visual effect to appear as in other folders, for example: Inbox or one that you create.

  So to delete an e-mail from for example: Inbox simply deletes the "Inbox" label and still leaves the email in "all messages".

  • https://support.Google.com/mail/answer/78755?hl=en