Use the GPU?

Similar Questions

• How to use the GPU for the AMD over-pants D500 in Mac pro 2013

  I install the first CC 2015 Pro and After Effect CC 2015 to 2013 with the graphics card AMD over-pants D500 Pro Mac, I can set GPU rendering in Premiere Pro, but impossible to define in the After Effect, only can use the CPU in the preview of the setting, how can I do?

  AE uses only a few NVIDIA CUDA enabled cards to speed up rendering drawn with RADIUS. This feature never quite worked, with disabilities masks and effects on layers 3D, and NVIDIA has changed the direction of their development of this technology for the Ray-traced rendering feature is is more developed by Adobe. They are working on another technology to use the GPU, but it is not yet available. There is nothing you can do to enable the GPU acceleration, unless you have a compatible NVIDIA card.

• I have the last El Captain MAC update fom and an iMac Mid 2015 retina but Lightroom refuses to use the GPU indicating a display error. Has anyone else experienced the same question?

  I have the latest update of El captain and an iMac Mid 2015 retina but Lightroom refuses to use the GPU indicating a display error. Has anyone else experienced the same question?

  I also got an iMac mid 2015 27 "retina and not have problems. But I have another option 'see the add screen pictures"deselected it's the ravages of a single reading. See screenshot of my graphics card.

  

• After using the GPU effects

  Szalam, if possible, I'd like some information in what concerns this topic because I'm having a moment a little hard to get my head around how After Effects uses the GPU in some situations.

  For example, I have a comp UltraHD quite complex with a group of layers 3D element. Because we work closely with the 3D with element layers, we have the rendering engine in After Effects "3D Classic" on. Because I'm using a GPU K4200, I'll just follow the advice of Adobe and use the CPU for any trace of the rays since the K4200 is "unsupported".

  So now that I'm assuming that After Effects will do all THE processing of treatment on the CPU - with the exception of the work of 3-d element, which will be done only on the GPU, correct? Then now, I guess as long as I "simultaneous rendering of several images multiprocessing" something sensible (i.e. leaving 1/4 or preferably more like 1/3 of the available RAM to non - After Effects-related work and not hungry processors), then After Effects will try to max-out the processors as much as possible for everything except the item in 3D work (which will be hopefully out the GPU max). Is this correct?

  Is it interesting to use in load/no tested (for example the K4200) GPU to accelerate the raytraced render engine in this scenario (i.e. 3D only in the model elements are 3D, element, cameras and lights 3D layers), or is it better to leave it on the CPU and leave the single GPU for 3D element?

  Thanks in advance!

  Chris Hocking wrote:

  For example, I have a comp UltraHD quite complex with a group of layers 3D element. Because we work closely with the 3D with element layers, we have the rendering engine in After Effects "3D Classic" on. Because I'm using a GPU K4200, I'll just follow the advice of Adobe and use the CPU for any trace of the rays since the K4200 is "unsupported".

  Right. Your scene does not all the layers using the ray traced in her rendering engine at all, so leave it on Classic 3d is the best choice. The new version of the item has "drawn with RADIUS' shadows and whatnot, but which is unrelated to converter traced to obsolete radius of EI. EI raytraced render engine is essentially an effect pressing the Optix of NVIDIA GPU library. It was just to add depth to layers. People are often confused and think that turning traced to the rendered RADIUS on would hire the GPU to make this, but the only thing he never accelerated has been traced to the RADIUS effect (which has very few people have already used).

  Chris Hocking wrote:

  So now that I'm assuming that After Effects will do all THE processing of treatment on the CPU - with the exception of the work of 3-d element, which will be done only on the GPU, correct?

  Yes.

  Chris Hocking wrote:

  Then now, I guess as long as I "simultaneous rendering of several images multiprocessing" something sensible (i.e. leaving 1/4 or preferably more like 1/3 of the available RAM to non - After Effects-related work and not hungry processors), then After Effects will try to max-out the processors as much as possible for everything except the item in 3D work (which will be hopefully out the GPU max). Is this correct?

  Pretty much, Yes. There are other potential bottlenecks (if you use images out of an external device with a slow connection, for example), but it's like basic things will be.

  Chris Hocking wrote:

  Is it interesting to use in load/no tested (for example the K4200) GPU to accelerate the raytraced render engine in this scenario (i.e. 3D only in the model elements are element and 3D & cameras lights 3D layers), or is it better to leave it on the CPU and leave the single GPU for 3D element?

  Your scene, as you describe it, does not use the ray-traced rendering engine at all. The ray-traced rendering engine is just a way to add depth and dimension to natively layers in AE. Given that you do not use this feature, by turning your comp to use the rendering engine raytraced won't help what whatsoever and, instead, plu cause lead the times.

  But you can feel free to test yourself. Try a rendering with the standard rendering engine and with the renderer raytraced lit. See if you can see differences.

  Here is an official blog of Adobe on the GPU in AE: features GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) in After Effects

• By using the GPU of the iMac to 5K with After Effects

  Hi all

  I have an iMac 27 "with an AMD Radeon R9 M290 (2 GB) GPU.

  I use after effects 14 CC, but I can't use it with the GPU (it uses the CPU). How can I solve the problem?

  (Use the CPU is not the best way to work with AE).

  Thank you.

  After Effects uses the GPU for very little.

  Your GPU will be used for all OpenGL GPU functions. It just will not be used for CUDA unique feature: the outdated plotted in 3D rendering engine Department.

  For more information, see the following page:

  Features GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) in After Effects

• By using the GPU for editing and rendering

  I just got a new GTX 770 4 GB classidied graphic card.

  However when I'm editing and rendered in CS6 I do not see that it is used in all the.

  I have the CUDA option selected in the project settings,

  but still first does not off the coast of the GPU.

  In any case, I can use the GPU to accelerate the rendering time?

  Please refer to this post on "what first Pro accelerates with CUDA/OpenCL?"

  http://blogs.Adobe.com/PremierePro/2011/02/CUDA-mercury-playback-engine-and-Adobe-Premiere - pro.html

  Best,

  Peter Garaway

  Adobe

  Premiere Pro

• Export / made video using the GPU / MPE?

  I have the support of acceleration GPU MPE enabled in my project settings, but when I export an H.264 YouTube Widescreen HD video preset, my GPU usage is 0% and my CPU usage is 74%.

  Is there something special I have to go do encode / export using the GPU not the CPU?

  MPE has only hardware acceleration if you have taken care of the effects in your timeline. If you have no effects supported in your time line, you will not receive.

  Despite all the hype about MPE and the supported cards, guests only if the effects that you use are those supported. If you don't regularly use them, what is the sense to invest in a video card cheap if you can't use it? It's something of that every potential buyer should be aware.

  Investment in a card CUDA support is only reasonable if you use effects supported regularly.

  Benefits to export a calendar without supported effects are still unclear and maybe you knew now that without these effects, there is no discernible benefits to a supported video card. I wish I knew more about it, but we need benchmarks to tell us where and when we can enjoy such a card.

• How LV will use the GPU as the Tesla

  Y at - it information about how LabVIEW can make use of something like a Tesla (Graphical Processing Unit with large number of processors on a single bus)?  He see a GPU as just another set of processors and seek opportunities of parallel process, use them?

  Hummer1

  You can check this link about future efforts in LabVIEW to take advantage of the GPU processing. It includes a prototype available for download from ni.com/labs site. I know not what sort of coverage in terms of GPU providers, there are at this point, or what we might do in the future, but there is a lot of material to browse if you wish.

• Switchable graphics: is it possible to use the GPU Radeon ONLY?

  Hi all

  I have two laptops: one is a Latitude E6420 and the other an Inspiron 14 Intel N4050.

  Both have switchable graphics; NVIDIA Optimus on the E6420 and Radeon on the N4050.

  I'm on Windows 7 Professional 64 - bit genuine on both machines.

  With the E6420, if I choose, I can either affect the GPU discreet default one or can I just go into the BIOS and disable Optimus, which makes the machine run only on the dedicated graphics card (I normally do, since I'm almost never far from an outlet.)

  Unfortunately, I have no such control with the N4050. I wonder if there's a similar way to disable shared Intel GPU on the N4050 in order to force him to run only on the Radeon graphics cards. There seems to be no way to do it via the BIOS, and I think that the deactivation of the GPU from Intel in Device Manager is not a good idea. I know I can control which GPU crosses where the Switchable Graphics method in Catalyst Control Center, but this function appears not yet to disable completely the shared GPU (which seems to take when running on battery - there is no apparent way to say with certainty what GPU no is used).

  Thanks in advance; your help is greatly appreciated.

  The answer is no, it's not.  The AMD GPU has no connection with the display device - all video data through the GPU on Board of the Intel processor.

  You cannot disable the on-CPU GPU - if you do, you will get no display at all.

• By using the GPU for rendering? Get makes it faster?

  I'm trying to export a 20 min video I've done in After Effects. It has a few effects of particles and some effects of Audio spectrum. When I start a Render, it shows between 20 to 30 hours to complete. If I had several machines I would have no problem with that, but I did not.

  I tried most of the suggestions in the forums to try and speed up the rendering time:

  

  • Clasic made instead of Ray traced
  • Removed unused and sequences pre comps
  • Reduced the number of effects
  • reduced the number of precomps
  • reduced the number of expressions
  • Rendering with CUDA
  • Disabled motion blur
  • Disabilities to 3D layers.

  Still, I can't take the shortest rendering time. I also tried various rendering parameters:

  • YouTube 1080 p
  • Youtube720p
  • QuickTime animation
  • Lossless
  • JPEG sequence

  with no major difference (youtube 1080 p being the best)

  I noticed that the SOUL does not all the power he could. It uses around 50% of CPU, but I read that may be because it doesn't have time to ramp upward before arriving at another framework.

  I also notice that even using CUDA acceleration, SOUL does not use power of the GPU at ALL. I have two GTX780 and I'm sure that if it was their use he would accelerate a lot, but I don't know if we can use them and if possible I don't know how to activate it.

  If you are looking for any other suggestions to speed up my rendering, or instructions for making SOUL use my GPU

  Data sheet:

  • I7 - 4790K
  • 32 GB of RAM
  • 2 x GTX780

  The GPU is not rendered 99% of everything that AE. If you use the TEA to render a model of EI then AE works in the background so SOUL must leave a few resources for do you other things. With the help of SOUL is always slower rendering with the Render tail if you go to the same format, but for most of us is not a problem because we don't sit and wait for makes, work us on the next shot or move on to another project. That's the beauty of the SOUL, must never stop creating - things, you get paid for.  If it's a rush to get out the project will restore then with making Cue of EI for a codec made fast production and then run through the SOUL SOUL being much more efficient and faster video transcoding in another format.

  As far as general things AE goes, temporal effects are taking the most time to render, particles also take a long time to render. Drawn to the beam with acceleration CUDA only is absolutely not supported in SOUL even if you have a correctly configured NVIDIA GPU. I know not all professionals that use drawn with RADIUS one rendered for anything whatsoever. There are much better solutions even without 3rd party effects.

  I hope this helps. The best way to get something out of the door is to make a standard production format by using the mark to return and a quick to render format ensuring that you use the formats of standard production for all of your belongings in the Ant project that are all of the images used in your publication to scale to 100% at some point in your comp (a lot of people try to make photo slideshows in HD with 20 images of a DSLR MP and all of them are resized way down). Once you have your master of standard production format that fall into the SOUL to generate your deliverables.

  Currently AE will not use 100% of your system resources when rendering HD or even 4 K video because AE watch only 1 frame at a time and any modern processor can easily treat an image using a fraction of its power. Then, we need to calculate everything again. Certain effects will use more memory a temporal effects and particles can quickly fill the memory, but until the basic architecture of the AE render engine is completely revamped we're stuck with makes it slow.

  Just FYI a little... Many of my composite complex can take 1 or 2 minutes per image for rendering. Some have taken 5 or 6 minutes. My 'pencil tests' or movement work almost always with little or no effects just to check the appearance of the animation. I call them pencil tests, test the hosts traditional photo pencil sketches to check the action and blocking before sending frames out to ink and paint because it makes no sense to paint on a stage where you don't know if Bambi walks funny because you didn't run a pencil and ink. In any case, my 'pencil tests' or previews make usually about 7 to 10 frames per second. It's the range of my work. Most production companies who are trying to earn a living do effects and editing have a fairly strict set of standards for travel times. Only, they conceive their work to fit into this mold.

• How can I set up that uses the GPU Lightroom 6?

  Hello!

  I just got 6 Lightroom and all is well until now. However, I think that the performance could be better, and I think that the reason is that Lightroom chooses the bad GPU.

  But let me first, I use an Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro (571 G-VN7-55ZA) with the following configuration:

  • Intel Core i5-4210U 1.7 GHz
  • 8 GB memory DDR3 L
  • 8 GB + HDD 1000 GB SSD hybrid
  • Graphics Intel HD 4400
  • NVIDIA GeForce 840 M with 2 GB dedicated VRAM
  • 8.1 Windows 64-bit

  My laptop so usually works with Intel HD GPU. But when I'm using Lightroom, I want my laptop to use the best NVIDIA GPU. Unfortunately, I found no option to set it up like this, in Lightroom, nor under the GPU.

  Does anyone know how this can be done?

  Or is it not necessary, because maybe the used GPU is start-up automatically as soon as the workload is too high? How can I test this?

  Thanks for your help in advance!

  See you soon

  You can change the default GPU for a program via the NVIDIA Control Panel, simply click on the Lightroom icon and select run with graphics processor-processor > choose default graphics...

  You will receive an option to select the graphic processor preferred for Lightroom.

  My advice would be NOT to disable the Intel HD in the Panel peripheral card.

• cannot use the gpu.

  I buy a new hp g6-1139 tx. with 2 GB of ram, 1 GB dedicated ati redone gpu hd, 1 GB integrated intel hd gpu

  ---> total 2 + 1 + 1 = 4 GB of memory.

  now, I add 2 GB of ram to my laptop. so in total 4 bg ram.

  ---> total 4 + 1 + 1 = 6 GB memory...

  I know that win 7 32 bits of the system can supports only 3.6 GB of memory... It can therefore something tht I see only 2.45 GB of ram in my computer property & I don't see my ati graphics card in DXDIAG... coz it use 3.5 GB of ram + 1 GB intel gpu = 3.6 GB

  Hi Jay,.

  If this is the case you need X 64 Bit drivers for the Card Ati Radeon you have in your computer.

  Therefore, you may have to download it from the HP website. or directly from ATI (if the graphics card was provided by hp then the HP drivers should work.)

  I found something for you, the difference between X 64 and X 86

  64 bit 32 vs

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/32-bit-and-64-bit-Windows-frequently-asked-questions

  My PC running the 32-bit version or 64-bit Windows?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/find-out-32-or-64-bit

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/installing-and-reinstalling-Windows-7

  Windows 7 64 bit comes in handy when you need to deal with at least 4 GB of RAM or more. Windows 7 32 bit can use up to 3.2 GB of RAM. Because the address space of memory is much larger for 64-bit Windows, this means that you need two times more memory than the 32-bit Windows to accomplish some of the same task, but you are able to do much more, you can have more apps open, do things like run a virus scan in the background it will affect the performance of your system. 64-bit Windows 7 is safer too, malicious code cannot easily infiltrate it, drivers are more reliable because they must be signed before it can work with 64 bit Windows 7.

  Regarding compatibility, you need device drivers 64-bit hardware devices, you may have. In addition, there is no 16-bit subsystem in Windows 7 64-bit, which means, your applications must be 32-bit only, not 16-bit Installer or programs uninstaller.

  Thank you

  Naidnaper

• Qosmio X 70-how use the GPU nVidia for external monitor

  Hello guys,.

  Can I use my card for an external monitor, BenQ Xl2420t geforce?
  Vga and hdmi only goes for the graphics card intel

  Try to solve this sequel to this workaround:
  Start Notepad in safe mode and uninstall the Nvidia driver.
  Then restart and reinstall the driver again.

  Some people have been able to solve this problem, but don t tell me why it worked, but it did.

• Audio jerky HDTV using the GPU Radeon HD HDMI output 7950

  I tried to look online and on the forum. I found a post, but it wasn't quite the issue I'm having.

  Sometimes - no particular trend spotted - the sound of my TV becomes and remains jerky.  Specifically, he's crashing several times every second about. However, when I run a video YouTube on Internet Explorer audio seems to be fixed (including any audio output, not just the video on IE).  As soon as I close IE audio becomes choppy.  I guess I should note there is no lag in the video performance or system, when this happens.

  I think that this question has to do with the release of my audio from my video card, because when I plug my headphones (for the header or line of motherboard) audio is not so rough.  Currently, I have a cable HDMI from my GPU to my TV and then output a line audio from my TV to the speakers.

  I have the drivers updated on my graphics card and my motherboard.

  This can be solved probably by plugging my computer directly into the audio mixer for my speakers Panel, but I would like to know if I can solve this problem with my current setup, because it is more convenient.

  Thanks for any help or you advise!  If need more information, I will do everything I can to help.

  System Specs:

  OS: Windows 8 Pro

  GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7950

  Mobo: ASUS P8Z77-V Pro

  CPU: Intel i7 - 3770K

  RAM: G Skill 8 GB DDR3

  It worked for me

  Originally posted by JeonjuHot
  Hello. Im a Korean user and I am not good in English. So. just interpret yourself.
  I got a same problem as you guys.
  I 7950 and receiver onkyo 707 and after worm. 12.3 drop audio had taken place.
  To fix this, I compared other drivers and found the solution.

  Open regedit and locate
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Video\ {... XXXX} \0000
  ('XXXX' means the device number. There are several file of the device number and 'AdapterDesc', you should find in the 0000 folder is what value of the key "amd radeon HD series 7XXX.).

  At that folder '0000', 'PP_SclkDeepSleepDisable REG_DWORD"change the value 0 to 1.
  and reboot ~! ~ ! ~ !

  I solve this problem like that and I hope to solve the problem.
  If it doesn't, I don't know. !! Good bye

• Black screen (no output) for RED files on the GPU acceleration

  Hey, maybe you can help me with my problem, since the update, I can't use the gpu acceleration for rendering of the r3d files, anything r3d in my calendar has become black, if I do not pass the software, I had hoped maybe I could export with gpu but it fails just there as well. From what IV ' e reading the question is if you have a gpu that is obsolete, but I have a gtx 970 if im not sure what I could do, resettlement had no effect.

  Hi jimbobwey,

  Branched your message in a new discussion.

  You touch a different question altogether. It is a problem with the NVIDIA drivers.

  Please see this: GPU acceleration

  Thank you

  Regalo