Export / made video using the GPU / MPE?

I have the support of acceleration GPU MPE enabled in my project settings, but when I export an H.264 YouTube Widescreen HD video preset, my GPU usage is 0% and my CPU usage is 74%.

Is there something special I have to go do encode / export using the GPU not the CPU?

MPE has only hardware acceleration if you have taken care of the effects in your timeline. If you have no effects supported in your time line, you will not receive.

Despite all the hype about MPE and the supported cards, guests only if the effects that you use are those supported. If you don't regularly use them, what is the sense to invest in a video card cheap if you can't use it? It's something of that every potential buyer should be aware.

Investment in a card CUDA support is only reasonable if you use effects supported regularly.

Benefits to export a calendar without supported effects are still unclear and maybe you knew now that without these effects, there is no discernible benefits to a supported video card. I wish I knew more about it, but we need benchmarks to tell us where and when we can enjoy such a card.

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Export reports updated using the DataTransferService

    Hi all

    I'm trying to set up a synchronization with our Eloqua instance by exporting saved reports using the DataTransferService API.  Documentation, it is said:

    Before you export data through most of export system, you will need to connect to the user of Eloqua® interface and create excerpts from standard data that you will run. You will need create a report 'saved' in Eloqua®, and then configure the report registered for export. Once that is done - the newly created export report will be shown in describing assets DataExport via the API.


    I created the report saved a contact filter; How to "configure this report backed up export?  When I look at the results of DescribeAssetType ("DataExport"), I don't see my report saved listed (I guess that's because I've not implemented for export again).  What Miss me?


    Thank you!

    Chung

    Nevermind, I figured it - go to the Admin report | Agents and using the drop-down arrow next to my name, select 'new on-demand report export.  Wow, it was hard to find! I hope this helps.

  • Use the GPU?

    Use the GPU?

    What is the official recommendation for a 1080 p monitor?

    Thank you

    Hi stephenr,.

    Check this link for a list of the graphics card tested and suggested for Lightroom:

    Adobe Lightroom GPU troubleshooting and FAQ

    Kind regards

    Claes

  • How to use the GPU for the AMD over-pants D500 in Mac pro 2013

    I install the first CC 2015 Pro and After Effect CC 2015 to 2013 with the graphics card AMD over-pants D500 Pro Mac, I can set GPU rendering in Premiere Pro, but impossible to define in the After Effect, only can use the CPU in the preview of the setting, how can I do?

    AE uses only a few NVIDIA CUDA enabled cards to speed up rendering drawn with RADIUS. This feature never quite worked, with disabilities masks and effects on layers 3D, and NVIDIA has changed the direction of their development of this technology for the Ray-traced rendering feature is is more developed by Adobe. They are working on another technology to use the GPU, but it is not yet available. There is nothing you can do to enable the GPU acceleration, unless you have a compatible NVIDIA card.

  • I have the last El Captain MAC update fom and an iMac Mid 2015 retina but Lightroom refuses to use the GPU indicating a display error. Has anyone else experienced the same question?

    I have the latest update of El captain and an iMac Mid 2015 retina but Lightroom refuses to use the GPU indicating a display error. Has anyone else experienced the same question?

    I also got an iMac mid 2015 27 "retina and not have problems. But I have another option 'see the add screen pictures"deselected it's the ravages of a single reading. See screenshot of my graphics card.

  • Lighroom 6.1 develop vs vs library export colors change with the GPU acceleration

    Having managed to obtain the execution of acceleration GPU (with AMD Radeon 6800 on Windows 7) subsequently, I make a radical change in color between the library and develop modules.  The develop module shows a really cool picture.  This can be 'activated' on and outside by disabling GPU acceleration.  The library files and anyexported show a warmer image in comparison.

    How can I fix it?  Anyone has any ideas - I had to disable the GPU at the moment... again...

    Library and develop are color management and use the profile.  But they use it in different ways with different code (for example develop uses the GPU is not the case of library), so incompatibilities in the risk profile of stumbling one but not the other.

  • After using the GPU effects

    Szalam, if possible, I'd like some information in what concerns this topic because I'm having a moment a little hard to get my head around how After Effects uses the GPU in some situations.

    For example, I have a comp UltraHD quite complex with a group of layers 3D element. Because we work closely with the 3D with element layers, we have the rendering engine in After Effects "3D Classic" on. Because I'm using a GPU K4200, I'll just follow the advice of Adobe and use the CPU for any trace of the rays since the K4200 is "unsupported".

    So now that I'm assuming that After Effects will do all THE processing of treatment on the CPU - with the exception of the work of 3-d element, which will be done only on the GPU, correct? Then now, I guess as long as I "simultaneous rendering of several images multiprocessing" something sensible (i.e. leaving 1/4 or preferably more like 1/3 of the available RAM to non - After Effects-related work and not hungry processors), then After Effects will try to max-out the processors as much as possible for everything except the item in 3D work (which will be hopefully out the GPU max). Is this correct?

    Is it interesting to use in load/no tested (for example the K4200) GPU to accelerate the raytraced render engine in this scenario (i.e. 3D only in the model elements are 3D, element, cameras and lights 3D layers), or is it better to leave it on the CPU and leave the single GPU for 3D element?

    Thanks in advance!

    Chris Hocking wrote:

    For example, I have a comp UltraHD quite complex with a group of layers 3D element. Because we work closely with the 3D with element layers, we have the rendering engine in After Effects "3D Classic" on. Because I'm using a GPU K4200, I'll just follow the advice of Adobe and use the CPU for any trace of the rays since the K4200 is "unsupported".

    Right. Your scene does not all the layers using the ray traced in her rendering engine at all, so leave it on Classic 3d is the best choice. The new version of the item has "drawn with RADIUS' shadows and whatnot, but which is unrelated to converter traced to obsolete radius of EI. EI raytraced render engine is essentially an effect pressing the Optix of NVIDIA GPU library. It was just to add depth to layers. People are often confused and think that turning traced to the rendered RADIUS on would hire the GPU to make this, but the only thing he never accelerated has been traced to the RADIUS effect (which has very few people have already used).

    Chris Hocking wrote:

    So now that I'm assuming that After Effects will do all THE processing of treatment on the CPU - with the exception of the work of 3-d element, which will be done only on the GPU, correct?

    Yes.

    Chris Hocking wrote:

    Then now, I guess as long as I "simultaneous rendering of several images multiprocessing" something sensible (i.e. leaving 1/4 or preferably more like 1/3 of the available RAM to non - After Effects-related work and not hungry processors), then After Effects will try to max-out the processors as much as possible for everything except the item in 3D work (which will be hopefully out the GPU max). Is this correct?

    Pretty much, Yes. There are other potential bottlenecks (if you use images out of an external device with a slow connection, for example), but it's like basic things will be.

    Chris Hocking wrote:

    Is it interesting to use in load/no tested (for example the K4200) GPU to accelerate the raytraced render engine in this scenario (i.e. 3D only in the model elements are element and 3D & cameras lights 3D layers), or is it better to leave it on the CPU and leave the single GPU for 3D element?

    Your scene, as you describe it, does not use the ray-traced rendering engine at all. The ray-traced rendering engine is just a way to add depth and dimension to natively layers in AE. Given that you do not use this feature, by turning your comp to use the rendering engine raytraced won't help what whatsoever and, instead, plu cause lead the times.

    But you can feel free to test yourself. Try a rendering with the standard rendering engine and with the renderer raytraced lit. See if you can see differences.

    Here is an official blog of Adobe on the GPU in AE: features GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) in After Effects

  • By using the GPU of the iMac to 5K with After Effects

    Hi all

    I have an iMac 27 "with an AMD Radeon R9 M290 (2 GB) GPU.

    I use after effects 14 CC, but I can't use it with the GPU (it uses the CPU). How can I solve the problem?

    (Use the CPU is not the best way to work with AE).

    Thank you.

    After Effects uses the GPU for very little.

    Your GPU will be used for all OpenGL GPU functions. It just will not be used for CUDA unique feature: the outdated plotted in 3D rendering engine Department.

    For more information, see the following page:

    Features GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) in After Effects

  • By using the GPU for editing and rendering

    I just got a new GTX 770 4 GB classidied graphic card.

    However when I'm editing and rendered in CS6 I do not see that it is used in all the.

    I have the CUDA option selected in the project settings,

    but still first does not off the coast of the GPU.

    In any case, I can use the GPU to accelerate the rendering time?

    Please refer to this post on "what first Pro accelerates with CUDA/OpenCL?"

    http://blogs.Adobe.com/PremierePro/2011/02/CUDA-mercury-playback-engine-and-Adobe-Premiere - pro.html

    Best,

    Peter Garaway

    Adobe

    Premiere Pro

  • By using the GPU for rendering? Get makes it faster?

    I'm trying to export a 20 min video I've done in After Effects. It has a few effects of particles and some effects of Audio spectrum. When I start a Render, it shows between 20 to 30 hours to complete. If I had several machines I would have no problem with that, but I did not.

    I tried most of the suggestions in the forums to try and speed up the rendering time:

    Untitled-1.jpg

    • Clasic made instead of Ray traced
    • Removed unused and sequences pre comps
    • Reduced the number of effects
    • reduced the number of precomps
    • reduced the number of expressions
    • Rendering with CUDA
    • Disabled motion blur
    • Disabilities to 3D layers.

    Still, I can't take the shortest rendering time. I also tried various rendering parameters:

    • YouTube 1080 p
    • Youtube720p
    • QuickTime animation
    • Lossless
    • JPEG sequence

    with no major difference (youtube 1080 p being the best)

    I noticed that the SOUL does not all the power he could. It uses around 50% of CPU, but I read that may be because it doesn't have time to ramp upward before arriving at another framework.

    I also notice that even using CUDA acceleration, SOUL does not use power of the GPU at ALL. I have two GTX780 and I'm sure that if it was their use he would accelerate a lot, but I don't know if we can use them and if possible I don't know how to activate it.

    If you are looking for any other suggestions to speed up my rendering, or instructions for making SOUL use my GPU

    Data sheet:

    • I7 - 4790K
    • 32 GB of RAM
    • 2 x GTX780

    The GPU is not rendered 99% of everything that AE. If you use the TEA to render a model of EI then AE works in the background so SOUL must leave a few resources for do you other things. With the help of SOUL is always slower rendering with the Render tail if you go to the same format, but for most of us is not a problem because we don't sit and wait for makes, work us on the next shot or move on to another project. That's the beauty of the SOUL, must never stop creating - things, you get paid for.  If it's a rush to get out the project will restore then with making Cue of EI for a codec made fast production and then run through the SOUL SOUL being much more efficient and faster video transcoding in another format.

    As far as general things AE goes, temporal effects are taking the most time to render, particles also take a long time to render. Drawn to the beam with acceleration CUDA only is absolutely not supported in SOUL even if you have a correctly configured NVIDIA GPU. I know not all professionals that use drawn with RADIUS one rendered for anything whatsoever. There are much better solutions even without 3rd party effects.

    I hope this helps. The best way to get something out of the door is to make a standard production format by using the mark to return and a quick to render format ensuring that you use the formats of standard production for all of your belongings in the Ant project that are all of the images used in your publication to scale to 100% at some point in your comp (a lot of people try to make photo slideshows in HD with 20 images of a DSLR MP and all of them are resized way down). Once you have your master of standard production format that fall into the SOUL to generate your deliverables.

    Currently AE will not use 100% of your system resources when rendering HD or even 4 K video because AE watch only 1 frame at a time and any modern processor can easily treat an image using a fraction of its power. Then, we need to calculate everything again. Certain effects will use more memory a temporal effects and particles can quickly fill the memory, but until the basic architecture of the AE render engine is completely revamped we're stuck with makes it slow.

    Just FYI a little... Many of my composite complex can take 1 or 2 minutes per image for rendering. Some have taken 5 or 6 minutes. My 'pencil tests' or movement work almost always with little or no effects just to check the appearance of the animation. I call them pencil tests, test the hosts traditional photo pencil sketches to check the action and blocking before sending frames out to ink and paint because it makes no sense to paint on a stage where you don't know if Bambi walks funny because you didn't run a pencil and ink. In any case, my 'pencil tests' or previews make usually about 7 to 10 frames per second. It's the range of my work. Most production companies who are trying to earn a living do effects and editing have a fairly strict set of standards for travel times. Only, they conceive their work to fit into this mold.

  • Switchable graphics: is it possible to use the GPU Radeon ONLY?

    Hi all

    I have two laptops: one is a Latitude E6420 and the other an Inspiron 14 Intel N4050.

    Both have switchable graphics; NVIDIA Optimus on the E6420 and Radeon on the N4050.

    I'm on Windows 7 Professional 64 - bit genuine on both machines.

    With the E6420, if I choose, I can either affect the GPU discreet default one or can I just go into the BIOS and disable Optimus, which makes the machine run only on the dedicated graphics card (I normally do, since I'm almost never far from an outlet.)

    Unfortunately, I have no such control with the N4050. I wonder if there's a similar way to disable shared Intel GPU on the N4050 in order to force him to run only on the Radeon graphics cards. There seems to be no way to do it via the BIOS, and I think that the deactivation of the GPU from Intel in Device Manager is not a good idea. I know I can control which GPU crosses where the Switchable Graphics method in Catalyst Control Center, but this function appears not yet to disable completely the shared GPU (which seems to take when running on battery - there is no apparent way to say with certainty what GPU no is used).

    Thanks in advance; your help is greatly appreciated.

    The answer is no, it's not.  The AMD GPU has no connection with the display device - all video data through the GPU on Board of the Intel processor.

    You cannot disable the on-CPU GPU - if you do, you will get no display at all.

  • When I export a video edited, the maximum dimensions are reduced. :(

    Hi, I am new to using Adobe first Pro CC. His version is 7.2.2. I use it on my Mac. I'm free range.

    I imported a video with domentsions of 2560 x 1600. Then, I edited this video. When I tried to export the edited video, the maximum dimentisons of video is 2048 x 1280.

    I want to export my video edited on dimensions of 2560 x 1600. How can I get this done?

    Thank you.

    Wei

    In your in the video settings of your export settings scroll down a bit you get to these settings.

    Then twirl them down.

  • Help please - component video using the same clip several times

    Hi people,

    I have a 9 minute video I want to cut into pieces and make a 3 min video. I searched the help system and Forum, but found nothing - very probably (not being is not a native speaker) looking for the wrong keywords.

    How can I add the same clip several times to a movie? If that has been resolved, I could do the rest with setting- and outpoints and would.

    Thank you in advance.

    Christoph

    You can place the clip on the timeline and use the Split Clip (small scissors under the monitor icon) to split your clip. Place the cursor where you want to trim your clip, and then click the icon of the scissors. Move the cursor to the next position, and then click the icon of the scissors again. Then press DELETE on your keyboard and that article will be deleted and the gap will be closed. If you wish, you can take small sections, you created and drag them around to change their positions.

    Once you have edited your clip, you can export the section 3 minutes as a DV - AVI to use repeatedly in your video. All you need to do to export is file > export > Movie. If you have several clips on your timeline you must place the work area bar (WAB), the gray bar above the timeline, on the section that you want to export. Then in the window export movie go into settings and for the beach, select work area bar.

    You can then reimport the 3 minute clip in your project and use it as many times as you want.

  • Pages export to Word using the model of NEWSLETTER, issue 1 of page spacing

    QUESTION: Anyone know if model NEWSLETTER (and or Museum Brochure) correctly export to .docx and how delete images or change the text boxes using these models so that I am still able to export properly?

    I used the NEWSLETTER model, whose Pages can export to .docx and then import to .docx (I don't know if that Word can do, but Pages indicates it would be).

    Problem: after the header of the newsletter, I removed the photo and have floating only the areas of text underneath.  I have two pages, the 2nd page export perfect (a page break separates it from the first).  On the first page, there are 12 small boxes in two columns under the heading who generously and easily fit on the first page.  It is not unlike the model I have, however, but with no photos.  I've seen many templates use these 'boxes' in support of the columns of text on a page, I don't think the floating box would be a problem.  However, I like the wish of floating boxes to learn how to use them so that they "work".

    I saw immediately that the text boxes, I added, when export and imported .docx, lose their place and float under the heading (NEWSLETTER) (superimposed text, bad page layout).

    I noticed the paragraph (carriage return, Enter) symbols, while I moved around text boxes, had become interlaced between the boxes, but not all - 1/2 at the bottom of page.  I then noticed that attempt to remove the superfluous paragraph runs in .pages (after repositioning all the boxes), but aggravated .docx, also the Pages do not leave even to remove the first symbol (it mystifies me, because the models do not appear to use paragraph at all except inside the floating boxes).

    Finally, I added enough symbols paragraph so that there was a conflict between each text box, but not as much as Word decide to add a blank page.  I had to make sure the columns are too wide - they should be 1/4 "part we will tell.  THAT APPEARED TO WORK.  Pages exported and imported it point by point I was happy.

    But when my Advisor job achieved and open in Word (the one for Windows 7), the SAME problem, I had before setting the transport returns appeared: the two decoders or four are overlapping the title, and set the person must have inserted transport returns before the first text box to move it all down (which seemed to work - but failed as an export and no not to use practice later).  'good work '.  Fortunately, I also have attatched a PDF export, however the person had asked to change their PLU using high government dell.

    QUESTION: Anyone know if model NEWSLETTER (and or Museum Brochure) correctly export to .docx and how delete images or change the text boxes using these models so that I am still able to export properly?

    Thank you hope that your next print job loose its staples.

    Well, we have said for years in this community if you want stressless, architecture native document exchange with Windows Word users that you need to use the most recent Word available on the Mac.

    Pages is not a clone of Word, and Apple does not guarantee that the open translation process / export from/to the architecture of document Word will remain faithful to the original of the document formatted.

    In response to your questions:

    1. If you have document objects in a model with x on their border, and then the object is locked. You visit the tab Pages to reorganize v5, and downstairs you can unlock these objects for further editing, or deletion.
    2. It is advice that we can give here will make sure Pages exports specifically to the word he already did not. The logic of translation is connected to demand, and it is the price of roulette.
    3. Continue the first paragraph.
  • Toshiba 40L7335DG: small delay audio/video using the tuner internal

    Sometimes the video audio delay when you use the tv tuner internal.
    The delay is sometimes small and insignificant, sometimes reach approximately 500 ms.

    When some audio or video settings are set to different values to the default values stay worse.

    Other TV (LG) don't have the problem when using the same signal.

    Hello

    Have Hmm you tried to reset the TV to factory default?
    Do this. I read somewhere else that factory settings could help solve such audio problems.

    I had a similar problem with my TV from another manufacturer using a HiFi amplifier as part of s the TV HDMI port.
    But I could solve it an option in the menu of the amp which decreased the output of audio sync problems.

Maybe you are looking for