validate/compare the 2 fields amount

Similar Questions

• It is possible to compare the contact fields based on the value of data updated?

  Hi all -

  I would like to run a filter and compare my contact fields if the value in a field has been updated or changed.

  for example if the data in the "first name" value changes to be empty to have a value, which would respect the requirement.  Also if "phone number" 123-456-7890 to 999-000-0000 that would also meet the requirement.

  Did anyone done this before?  Any ideas of how to implement?

  Any contribution is appreciated.  Thank you!

  If that's what you're talking about, there is no trace of audit in Eloqua.

  It will be great if Oracle can verify the critical fields.

  The solution is to create to the top of the field in another area, so when it changes, you can compare the values.

  Good luck

• Canvas campaign: filters common vs compare the Contact fields

  HI -.

  Is there a difference between using one or several Contact fields compare elements vs using a shared filter?

  In my campaign, I need to check if one of the three fields is equal to something specific (and therefore remove them from the campaign).  I couldn't achieve exactly the same results if I used a shared filter that sought the same criteria?

  Thank you

  Abe

  1. the shared filter evaluates when someone passes through this point of decision.  It is different from that of a Segment in which a Segment is your first point of qualification for a campaign (so why someone "stays in the segment").  They actually stay in the segment so that they did not leave the campaign yet.  If the segment is more permissive, your filter shared between them, so that hardly leave the campaign according to your rule.

  2. I saw your other post on the date field.  You're right... when I try in the Web I get an error as well.  Definitely a bug in the interface user, as you can do in a segment.  I would say for now you use the shared empty contact filter and log a ticket with Support for the bug in the user interface.

• By comparing the dynamic fields of objects using equals and hashCode methods

  To compare the different objects of the same class with their content as jobTitleId, classificationId, deptId & classificationId had to be done and do a few steps later, using Set and the map. I was able to do it by simple substitution of equals and hashCode methods of the object class and was able to read the information (as in the map below).

  Map < LocationData, list < LocationData > >

  The following is the class I used (its been shown you so that it can be called for my problem statement):

  Class LocationData

  package com.astreait.bulkloader;

  public class LocationData {}

  String locId, deptId, jobTitleId, classificationId;

  @Override

  public boolean equals (Object obj) {}

  LocationData ld = (LocationData) obj;

  return this.deptId.equals (ld.deptId) & & this.jobTitleId.equals (ld.jobTitleId) & & this.classificationId.equals (ld.classificationId) & &

  this.locId.equals (ld.locId);

  }

  @Override

  public int hashCode() {}

  return deptId.hashCode () + jobTitleId.hashCode () + classificationId.hashCode () + locId.hashCode ();

  }

  }

  Problem:

  I am already known to which all the fields of this object, I need to make the comparison.

  IE I have to use the variables named classificationId, deptId, jobTitleId & locId etc.

  Need:

  I need to customize this logic such as names (classificationId, deptId, jobTitleId & locId etc.) fields can be learned, dynamically, as well as their values. So, as far as I understand, I've made use of 2 classes (TableClass and ColWithData), such as the list of the ColWithData is there in the TableClass object.

  I think what will happen if I substitute the same two methods "equals() and hashCode();"

  as the same thing is possible.

  TableClass class #1

  Class TableClass {}

  The list < ColWithData > cwdList;

  @Override

  public boolean equals (Object obj) {}

  Return Boolean = false;

  I need to have the logic must be set such that

  all dynamic fields can be compared

  return return;

  }

  @Override

  public int hashCode() {}

  Return int = 0;

  I need to have the logic must be set such that

  All dynamic fields for their individual codes can be found

  return return;

  }

  }

  ColWithData class #2

  Class ColWithData {}

  Pass the string; Here, the jobTitleId, classificationId, deptId, locId or any other information fields more may come.

  String data; The corresponding data or value for each jobTitleId, classificationId, deptId, locId or any other more fields.

  }

  Please let me know if I'm the procedure in the right direction or should I do a different approach. If it is allowed to use the current approach then what should be done to equals and hashCode methods?

  Finally, I need to make the map as: (is not worried how I give you, but may be considered my goal sought this logic)

  Map < TableClass, list < TableClass > > finalMap;

  I'm sorry for that. Although the problem is resolved, on my side.

• compare the 4 fields in a table

  Hi, today my brain pains, can someone please tell me how to compare 4 fields in a table to see if they are all equal?
  

  create table dm_test (n_1 number,
  n_2 number,
  n_3 number,
  n_4 number);

  INSERT INTO dm_test
       (n_1,
        n_2,
        n_3,
        n_4)
  VALUES
       (1,
        1,
        1,
        1);
       
   INSERT INTO dm_test
       (n_1,
        n_2,
        n_3,
        n_4)
  VALUES
       (3,
        2,
        2,
        2);
           
    INSERT INTO dm_test
       (n_1,
        n_2,
        n_3,
        n_4)
  VALUES
       (0,
        0,
        0,
        3);
          

  The result of my query must return only
  first row
  1 1 1 1
  
  Thanks people...

  Maybe something like that?

  SQL> SELECT  *
    2  FROM    dm_test
    3  WHERE   n_1 = n_2
    4  AND     n_2 = n_3
    5  AND     n_3 = n_4
    6  /
  
                   N_1                  N_2                  N_3                  N_4
  -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
                     1                    1                    1                    1
  

  It won't however if you're concerned about NULL values. Do you want a row to return if they are NULL?

  EDIT:

  The version that supports the NULL:

  SQL> INSERT INTO dm_test VALUES(NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> SET NULL '(null)'
  
  SQL> SELECT  *
    2  FROM    dm_test
    3  WHERE   NVL(n_1,-1) = NVL(n_2,-1)
    4  AND     NVL(n_2,-1) = NVL(n_3,-1)
    5  AND     NVL(n_3,-1) = NVL(n_4,-1)
    6  /
  
                   N_1                  N_2                  N_3                  N_4
  -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
                     1                    1                    1                    1
  (null)               (null)               (null)               (null)
  

  Edited by: Centinul May 14, 2010 07:07

• By comparing the inputtext fields

  Hello
  I have a simple question. I'm usgin Jdev 11.1.2.2.0. My use case:
  
  I have a VO with 3 fields (username, question and answer).
  When the user enters the answer, I need to check in the database for the particular ANS if it is appropriate, the user be able to.
  The steps I did:
  (1) created read only VO.
  (2) developed a method in the bean, which will be the username, answer.
  (3) callin the method in the module of the application.
  (4) but I always "result: error".
  
  Bean code:
  
  public String answerTabout (ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {}
  String resultstr = "error";
  User String = (String) username.getValue ();
  Years = (String) checkAns.getValue ();
  System.out.println ("Calling");
  Links DCBindingContainer = ((DCBindingContainer) BindingContext.getCurrent () .getCurrentBindingsEntry ());
  Method of the class OperationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding ("checkUser");
  Map params = method.getParamsMap ();
  params.put ('years', years);
  params.put ("user", user);
  
  System.out.println ("Done");
  
  Object result = method.execute ();
  {if (!) Method.GetErrors (). IsEmpty())}
  ResultStr = "success";
  System.out.println ("result" + resultstr);
  
  }
  System.out.println ("returnStr =" + resultstr);
  Return resultstr;
  }
  
  
  Code of the AOS:
  
  ' Public Sub checkUser (String years, String user)
  {
  AnswerVOImpl vo = (AnswerVOImpl) getAnswer1 ();
  
  System.out.println ("frm applcaitoon");
  System.out.println (years + "" + user);
  System.out.println (VO);
  vo.setNamedWhereClauseParam("check_user",user);
  vo.executeQuery ();
  int rowCount = vo.getEstimatedRangePageCount ();
  int count = vo.getRowCount ();
  
  System.out.println ("ROWCOUNT =" + RowCount);
  {if(ROWCOUNT==0)}
  System.out.println ("no match");
  
  }
  
  
  log file:
  the call
  fact
  FRM applcaitoon
  Jose ispl\dmptest
  com.laurus.model.viewobject.readonly.AnswerVOImpl@188834e
  number of lines = 1
  returnStr = error
  
  What's not in my code? Or is there another method better do?

  Your check condition after execution of the binding of the method is the wrong way autour:

  if(!method.getErrors().isEmpty()) {
  resultstr = "succes";
  System.out.println("result " + resultstr);
  }
  

  should be

  if(!method.getErrors().isEmpty()) {
  // you get here only if the method returns an error
  System.out.println("result " + resultstr);
  return;
  }
  
  int count = (int)method.getResult();
  if (count > 0)
      resultstr = "succes";
  
  System.out.println("result " + resultstr);
  return resultstr;
  

  Next, you need to return something from the AM method. Otherwise, you cannot know if the answer matches.

  // return no of rows found. If count == 0 no match found
  public int checkUser(String ans, String user )
  {
  AnswerVOImpl vo = (AnswerVOImpl)getAnswer1();
  System.out.println("frm applcaitoon");
  System.out.println(ans + " " + user);
  System.out.println(vo);
  vo.setNamedWhereClauseParam("check_user",user);
  vo.executeQuery();
  int rowCount=vo.getEstimatedRangePageCount();
  System.out.println("rowCount="+rowCount);
  if(rowCount==0) {
  System.out.println("not matched");
  
  return rowCount;
  }
  

  You should check the AM method. It looks like, it does not check the answer, but only the user.

  Timo

• Disqualification: Compare the value list in another Table

  I'm relatively new to the Disqualification.

  I use the 11.1.1.7 version.

  I have 2 tables Oracle.  Table1.FieldA does not have a foreign key constraint (but should be) at Table2.FieldB.

  I created a snapshot for Table1 that includes FieldA.

  I created another cliché to Table2 which includes FieldB.

  I am trying to compare the Table1.FieldA with Table2.FieldB value to make sure that there is.

  I can think of a few processors that I could, but they seem to compare a value with another value in the same snapshot (table).

  Any advice would be helpful.

  
  Thank you.

  Ray

  Hello

  Use the search check if you want to just check between the tables. According to the reference database, you need create a list of choices on the table (can be either staged as you, or just a list of external choice provided the lookup columns are indexed). Use Lookup and return if you want to import data in the other table in your process. You can control if you want a 1:1 or from a 1:M relationship, and if you go back several records, you can use split chronogram: table with all the paintings of entry to create an intermediate join process.

  Mike

• Confirm the email address on the form field

  Is there a simple way to add a field "Confirm email address" in our forms so that people don't accidentally send forms with an incorrect email? It would be just to compare the two fields to make sure they match.

  Try this:

  http://KB.worldsecuresystems.com/598/bc_598.html#main_Adding_an_email_verification_field_t o_a_web_form

• In an Adobe form I need the value of Field3 to display the higher of the two fields, Field1 value or Field2 (compare the value of Field1 and Field2 and display the highest amount in field3) can someone please tell me the script to run this simple comparis

  I have 2 fields that are calculated fields and I need display the higher value of the 2 fields in a third field

  The field names must be in double - quotes. And if you change the value of any field, now, you will see error messages in the console.

• With the help of javascript code to validate content in the text field only if the field is visible...

  I have a "Lock of all areas" set up button and it took to run only if some fields are filled. The code works fine... except TextField13 does not validate correctly. TextField13 is encapsulated in a subform, titled busjus. The busjus subform is hidden at the disposal of the default form (it becomes visible only when a user selects some text in a drop-down list). I want the code to check if TextField13 is null only if the busjus subform is visible.

  The problematic part of the code that does not work as expected is listed below:

  partiv.nonflow.busjus.presence == visible) && partiv.nonflow.busjus.TextField13 == null ||  

  Complete code is listed below:

  if(partiandii.parti.TextField2.rawValue == null || 
  partiandii.parti.TextField1.rawValue == null || 
  partiandii.parti.DropDownList5.rawValue == null ||
  //Part II: Current Job Details
  partiv.nonflow.busjus.presence == visible) && partiv.nonflow.busjus.TextField13 == null ||  
  partiandii.partii.NumericField2.rawValue == null ||)
  {
      app.alert('Please complete all fields marked with a red asterisk and try clicking the button again.');   
  }
  else {
      myScriptObject.LockAllFields(form1);
  }
  

  Hello

  At a glance, I believe that this piece must include the rawValue call

  partiv.nonflow.busjus.TextField13
  

  This should be

  partiv.nonflow.busjus.TextField13.rawValue

  so that you compare the text in the field instead of the actual field object.

  Hope this helps

  Malcolm

• Compare the amount of the previous month based on the account number

  Hi team,
  
  In my table of the source, amount aggregated by month for a given account there
  

  ACCOUNT_NUMBER          YEAR          MONTH          AMOUNT
  ---------------          -------          ------          -----------
  123456789          2012          01          450.00
  123456789          2012          02          -234.00
  123456789          2012          03          0.00
  123456789          2012          04          890.00
  123456789          2012          05          78.00
  123456789          2012          06          44444.00
  123456789          2012          07          450.00
  123456789          2012          08          450.00
  123456789          2012          09          450.00
  123456789          2012          10          120.67
  123456789          2012          11          176.88
  123456789          2012          12          450.00
  123456789          2013          01          340.00

  Now, I need to add a column more in this area, with logic below. There will be more than 1000 accounts available. For each account I need to achieve this.
  
  CASE WHEN MONTH_AMOUNT = 0 THE CASE OTHERWISE 1-0 WHEN PREVIOUS_MONTH_AMOUNT = 0 THEN 0 1 OTHER)
  
  On this basis, the objective should be
  

  ACCOUNT_NUMBER          YEAR          MONTH          AMOUNT          FLAG
  ---------------          -------          ------          -----------     -------------
  123456789          2012          01          450.00          1
  123456789          2012          02          -234.00          1
  123456789          2012          03          0.00          -1
  123456789          2012          04          890.00          1
  123456789          2012          05          78.00          1
  123456789          2012          06          44444.00     1     
  123456789          2012          07          450.00          1
  123456789          2012          08          450.00          1
  123456789          2012          09          450.00          1
  123456789          2012          10          0.00          1
  123456789          2012          11          0.00          0
  123456789          2012          12          450.00          1
  123456789          2013          01          340.00          1

  can someone help me how to compare the value of the previous month. All columns have the data varchar, except for the quantity type.

  Hello

  I have not tried. But this desire.

  SELECT
  ACCOUNT_NUMBER,
  YEAR,
  MONTH,
  AMOUNT,
  CASE WHEN AMOUNT = 0 THE 0 ELSE 1 - CASE WHEN LAG(AMOUNT, 1, 0) OVER (PARTITION BY ACCOUNT_NUMBER ORDER BY YEAR, MONTH) = 0 THEN 0 ELSE 1) AS FLAG
  FROM SOURCE_TABLE;
  

  See you soon
  Didier

  Published by: Didier vishwakarma on 6 March 2013 12:36

• Comparing the sum of the two tables and correct by difference of amount in its second t

  Hello guys,.
  
  I have a very difficult task that I can't get my head around.
  The sample data looks like this:
  
  Master table
  Request - booking - debit - credit - MasterAmout
  1------------1----------------D---------------------------------15.3
  1------------2----------------D---------------------------------480.6
  1------------3------------------------------C-------------------496.8
  ------------------------------------------- 0.9
  
  
  The slave table
  Demande---reservation---debit---credit---slaveamout---slavecorrection
  1------------1------------D------------------------------------15.3---------------14.5
  1------------2------------D------------------------------------480.6-------------480.6
  1------------3-----------------------------C-------------------496---------------496
  -------------------------------------------0.1--------------------------------------0.9
  
  
  The reservation have a total amount of 0.1, but must be corrected to 0.9 because the main table has 0.9.
  
  Reservation 1 requires a correction so the slave table also has a total of 0.9 (business rule is, only corrections on the first booking). So we have
  to change the amount of 15.3 to 14.5. I plan my SQL like this:
  
  1 reservations sum of two tables for each claim. Compare the two for each individual claim.
  2. If Captain sum the amount shows a difference between master / slave
  2.1 select top 1 table reservation slave for the specific claim and increase/decrease by the difference of these two amounts.
  
  Who is?

  Hello

  Use MERGE to actually do the UPDATE.
  The ROW_NUMBER analytic function to identify the first booking in slave (unless you can count on which the reservation = 1).

  MERGE INTO     slave     dst
  USING     (
       WITH     master_summary     AS
       (
            SELECT       claim
            ,       SUM ( master_ampount * CASE
                                     WHEN  debit  = 'D'  THEN -1
                                     WHEN  credit = 'C'  THEN  1
                                 END
                       )     AS balance
            FROM       master
            GROUP BY  claim
       )
       SELECT     s.claim
       ,     s.booking
       ,     SUM ( s.slave_amount * CASE
                              WHEN  s.debit  = 'D'  THEN -1
                              WHEN  s.credit = 'C'  THEN  1
                             END
                ) OVER (PARTITION BY  claim) - m.balance     AS diff
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  claim
                           ORDER BY        booking
                         )     AS r_num
       FROM     master_summary     m
       JOIN     slave          s  ON     m.claim     = s.claim
       )          src
  ON     (     src.claim     = dst.claim
       AND     src.r_num     = 1
       )
  WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE
  SET     dst.debit      = CASE
                      WHEN src.diff      <  0 THEN 'D'
                                     ELSE NULL
                   END
  ,     dst.credit      = CASE
                      WHEN src.diff      <  0 THEN NULL
                                     ELSE 'C'
                   END
  ,     dst.slaveamount = ABS (src.diff)
  ;
  

  If you would care to CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data (showing the two tables, as they exist before the DML) then I could test this.

  The design of history seems very uncomfortable. Instead of the debit and credit columns, it would be much simpler to have positive and negative amounts. Is it really worth now both not corrected and corrected the amounts in the table on the slave, especially if you keep only versions corrected debit and credit columns?

• By comparing the fields on a JSPX

  OK, this should not be difficult, but I can't find anything on it.
  
  I want to do is compare two fields, in this case the dates on a form.
  
  Now, the tricky part seems to get values that are CURRENTLY in the form of type.
  
  I need a way to see what the user has typed currently on the form. Why is it so difficult? (or apparently?)
  
  He compares the value that was stored in the line, but this will only confuse the user:
  
  ' Public Sub StartDate_validator (FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent uIComponent object pObject)
  {
  RichInputDate vReturnDateComponent = uIComponent.findComponent ("id1") (RichInputDate);
  VReturnDate = vReturnDateComponent.getValue () (Date);
  Day vStartDate = pObject of (Date);
  System.out.println ("to start date" + vReturnDate.compareTo (vStartDate));
  
  If (vReturnDate.compareTo (vStartDate) < 0)
  {
  throw new ValidatorException (new FacesMessage (FacesMessage.SEVERITY_ERROR, "invalid leave", null));
  }
  }
  
  ' Public Sub ReturnDate_validator (FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent uIComponent object pObject)
  {
  RichInputDate vStartDateComponent = uIComponent.findComponent ("id2") (RichInputDate);
  VStartDate = vStartDateComponent.getValue () (Date);
  Day vReturnDate = pObject of (Date);
  System.out.println ("on the date of return" + vReturnDate.compareTo (vStartDate));
  
  If (vReturnDate.compareTo (vStartDate) < 0)
  {
  throw new ValidatorException (new FacesMessage (FacesMessage.SEVERITY_ERROR, "invalid return", null));
  }
  
  }
  
  < af:panelGroupLayout id = "pghb" layout = "vertical" >
  < af:inputDate value = "#{bindings." AutoSubmit DepartDate.inputValue}' = 'true '.
  label = "#{bindings." DepartDate.hints.label}.
  required = "#{bindings." DepartDate.hints.mandatory}.
  shortDesc = "#{bindings." DepartDate.hints.tooltip}"id ="id2 ".
  immediate = "true".
  Validator = "#{backingBeanScope.UpdateTABean.StartDate_validator}" >
  < f: validator binding = "#{bindings." DepartDate.validator} "/ >"
  
  <!-->
  < af:convertDateTime pattern = "#{bindings." DepartDate.format} "/ >"
  < / af:inputDate >
  < af:inputDate value = "#{bindings." AutoSubmit ReturnDate.inputValue}' = 'true '.
  label = "#{bindings." ReturnDate.hints.label}.
  required = "#{bindings." ReturnDate.hints.mandatory}.
  shortDesc = "#{bindings." ReturnDate.hints.tooltip}"id ="id1"immediate ="true ".
  Validator = "#{backingBeanScope.UpdateTABean.ReturnDate_validator}" >
  < f: validator binding = "#{bindings." ReturnDate.validator} "/ >"
  < af:convertDateTime pattern = "#{bindings." ReturnDate.format} "/ >"
  < / af:inputDate >
  < / af:panelGroupLayout >
  
  Thank you
  
  Jet

  Hello

  Try to set up each component of entry as one partialTrigger on the other. I think it should work.

  It has to do with the life cycle JSF/ADF. It becomes a bit complicated because of the autoSubmits and the immediate you have on components. Learn more about the cycle of life and its variants here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31973/af_lifecycle.htm

• Validation - validate if the field has a date format appropriate or a number

  Hello
  
  I have 2 of my form fields... we're the date type and the other is of type number... may I know how to validate if the field has the correct date/number format...
  
  Please advice how to write "Validation" of the APEX feature to accomplish the foregoing.
  
  Thank you

  can I know how to validate if the field has the correct date/number format...

  The most effective way is simply to try to convert to the type required (using format masks there) in a function to return a Boolean validation:

  declare
  
    n number;
  
  begin
  
    n := to_number(:p1_num_item);
  
    return true;
  
  exception
  
    when value_error or invalid_number
    then
      return false;
  
  end;
  

  and

  declare
  
    d date;
  
  begin
  
    d := to_date(:p1_date_item, 'DD-MON-YYYY');
  
    return true;
  
  exception
  
    when others
    then
      if sqlcode between -1899 and -1800
      then
        -- Date format error
        return false;
      else
        -- Unexpected error
        raise;
      end if;
  
  end;
  

  my date is in the following format: DD-MMM-AA

  There is no format 'MMM' model. And do not use 2-digit year formats: which caused bad enough already.

• Validate if the field contains a specific text

  Hi all

  I want to make a script in my form that validate the a field for a specific word.

  I have a domain where users can put it e-mail adres, but addresses with Yahoo that he should receive a warning that these addressen cannot be used.

  I have now If (this.rawValue is 'Yahoo')

  But I need advertising, a figure that it doesn't matter which text is based on this text, if it contains the warning must come from yahoo.

  How can I do this?

  Greetings,

  Timo

  Try the below. Choose the Java Script language.

  var strText = TextField1.rawValue.toLowerCase ();

  If (strText.IndexOf("Yahoo",0) > 0)
  xfa.host.messageBox ("Yahoo email addresses cannot be used");

  Thank you

  Srini