vCloud transfer server storage

Similar Questions

• The transfer server storage shared for vcloud Director cells

  Hello

  I'm building a cluster of vCloud Director (3 guests) in our environment, but I was wondering about transfer server shared storage that is required for downloads and uploads the data among all cells, here is that excerpts from the Director Cloud installation guide for the same

  ==============================================================================================================

  To provide temporary storage for uploads and downloads, shared storage must be accessible to all hosts in a cluster of clouds Director. The amount of storage to transfer server must have permissions writable by root. Each host must ride this storage $VCLOUD_HOME

  / Data/Transfer (in general transfer/opt/vmware/cloud-director/data/transfer). Uploads and downloads are the storage for a short time (a few hours a day), but because the transferred images can be large, allocate at least several hundred gigabytes at this volume.

  =============================================================================================================

  I have some questions related to this,

  1. can I use storage iSCSI for this "shared forwarding server storage" or only a NFS storage will do.

  2 storage is recommended according to the prospective of VMware.

  3. If anyone has references to the configuration for this storage documentation, please let me know.

  Thank you

  Keryan

  It is not explicitly stated above all because there are several options and alternatives.

  NFS is by far the easiest and also the easiest to wear but CIFS, for example, would work.  Like any other technique of file-sharing system that makes the blob of data readable and accessible in writing of all cells at the same time.

  iSCSI is not enough to really say yes or no to the subject.  If you have a shared several cells and do iscsi lun on it ext3 file system, then the cells will tear system metadata of file into pieces in a relatively short deadline, because ext3fs is not designed to be multi-homed.

  This isn't a limitation of iSCSI, or a lun SAN, or tours with virtual machines to share the same file several VMS vmdk, is put on top of this file system.

• Windows Server 2008 32 bit - "not enough server storage is available to process this command."

  My operating system is Windows Server 2008 32-bit. When I install SQL Server 2008, system throws me error.

  "Not enough server storage is available to process this command."

  Free space in my drive C is 195 GB.

  Even I checked upward with IRStackSize, and is to have a value of 50. I still get the same error.

  Kindly guide me to solve this issue.

  Concerning
  Hitesh Parsawala

  Hello

  You can find the Server forums on TechNet support, please create a new post at the following link:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

• Desktop\SharedDocs is not accessible. You are not allowed to use this network resource. Not enough server storage is available to process this command.

  \\XXXDesktop\SharedDocs is not accessible. You are not allowed to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have the permission to access. Not enough server storage is available to process this command.
  I got the above message when I tried to access my room servert pc (XP Pro with Service Pack 3) from another pc Client (XP Home Edition with service pack 3) on a network share. I see all class document & readers who share in my network places on both PCs.
  There is no problem when I have access to XP Home Edition of XP Pro. I heard the pc installed with Acronis True Image to give to this question. But my two PCs are installed with it. Any solution.
  What I've tried so far on my pc (XP Pro):
  1. click on start, run, type regedit, and then click OK.
  2. Locate and double-click the following registry subkey:
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa
  3. on the right side, double-click restrictanonymous setting.
  4. make sure that that the value in the value data box is set to 0, and then click OK_ (why the default value is 0. I change it to 1, but always the same)
  5. close the registry editor.
  6. restart the computer.
  I also tried to enable the allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts and shares on XP Pro (default value is Disable).
  File and printer sharing exception is enabled in firewall. Don't have a firewall part 3

  The two guest account are capable of Simple file sharing in XP Pro box checked also checked.

  Hello

  Please visit the following link.

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_xp-networking/three-computers-networked-fine-then-suddenly-the/3976b554-bb9c-4920-881f-38eb64480ca7

• Three computers networked fine then suddenly the error message «...» Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. Not enough server storage is available to process this command. "

  I had a network that worked very well with three 2 computers running Windows XP Professional and Windows XP Home Edition 1. Suddenly, the network has just stopped allowing certain communications giving the above error message (I have another thread address with XP to Vista computers). The main computer with XP Pro, I'll call A, the second computer with XP Pro, I'll call B and third with XP Home will be C. All computers can share files and printers then without any changes to the system that occurred the following:

  A can access the documents and printers on B and C

  B may NOT have access to documents or printers on one, but access to documents and printers on C

  C cannot have access to the documents on one, but CAN access A printer and CAN access the documents and printers on B

  When access is denied error message is displayed:
  "\\A\My documents is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. Not enough server storage is available to process this command. "(\\A\ being the computer that I am trying to access)

  As I said access from all computers on this network was working fine a week ago and there has been absolutely no changes made to the network. I checked the following

  1. workgroup name on all computers are the same
  2. file and printer sharing are enabled for all computers.
  3. all computers may been from each computers just denied in some cases.

  The firewall that runs on all three machines is AVG and there were no changes to the one last week, but I checked that sharing is allowed.

  I even tried to run the Configuration Wizard from the network on all computers to see if it works, but the same exact problems occur after doing this.

  I met this problem now THREE times. I can't believe that I'm the only one who has this problem and I can't believe that there isn't a solution for it. None of the Microsoft documentation has even a hint of a solution for this specific problem.

  I need a solution that closes completely the network at my church, and they cannot afford to buy printers and others for each of their computers.

  This error message is misleading. See article Knowledge Base Microsoft Antivirus software may Cause Event ID 2011 for a likely solution, specifying a value of IRPStackSize 15 on A computer.
  Boulder computer Maven
  Most Microsoft Valuable Professional

• Network access error: not enough server storage is available to process this command

  Hello
  I can't access the other computers on my network neighborhood.
  If I try to use \\computer\d$ running, I get "not enough server storage is available to process this command."

  I look in the case of newspapers and I have an error: "{the browser service has failed retrieve the backup list too many times on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{97851F92-8FAC-4FB2-A6C9-CAB1B0FE6593}." The secondary Explorer stops. »

  I enjoyed all the ideas. I hope I don't have to reinstall the system (Windows Vista Business 32 bit)

  Dan

  I'm glad that you got this sorting. You were one of the rare cases where there was not enough space on a hard drive. Generally, the "not enough space" is misleading. In all cases, it is good to know things work now. Thank you for taking the time to let us know. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Error when you try to connect to a shared network drive by car on the portable XP from VISTA desktop: "not enough server storage is available to process this command."

  Hello
  I was able to connect ok in a shared folder on my laptop VISTA from my XP desktop computer.
  but when I try the other way around (to connect to a shared drive on my desktop XP FROM my VISTA laptop), I get the following error message:

  "The mapped network drive could not be created because the following error occurred: not enough server storage is available to process this command."

  Desktop is HP Pavilion a1410n
  Windows XP SP3 Home Professional 3 GB RAM
  Laptop is HP dv5z
  Windows Vista Edition Home Premium SP2 4 GB RAM

  I would like suggestions.
  Thank you very much.

  Ideas:

  • You have problems with programs
  • Error messages
  • Recent changes to your computer
  • What you have already tried to solve the problem

  Remember - this is a public forum so never post private information such as numbers of mail or telephone!

  Steve,

  Thanks a lot for the link to this article.
  It was most helpful.

  I also found this forum useful post:
  http://www.techsupportforum.com/Networking-Forum/networking-support/114373-cant-map-new-network-drive.html

  In particular, he said to check the event log of the computer that you are trying to connect to (the remote computer) to search for an event ID 2011, which would be entered in the time you finally tried to connect and does not.
  I did alt-click on the icon MY COMPUTER (from the remote computer) and the menu HANDLE, click the EVENT VIEWER folder (in the left pane), and then the SYSTEM folder under that.
  On the right pane, I found an ad for the event ID 2011 at the time wherever I finally tried to connect.

  To test this, I went to the VISTA laptop and tried to connect the computer to Office XP again, which gives a different error message on the VISTA laptop.
  When I went back on the XP desktop I tried to connect to and looked again to the event log, of course ANOTHER event ID 2011 has been registered with the new time of my additional attempt to connect.

  He confirmed that it was likely that the IRPStackSize was the problem, as your proposed article.

  Then I printed article how DO TO SAVE AND RESTORE the REGISTER to: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322756/
  then backed up the registry (both by running a restore system to register and by exporting from the top level of the regedit).

  I then went in regedit on the desktop in XP for the
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CURRENTCONTROLSET\SERVICES\LANMANSERVER\Parameters file described in your article.
  There was NOT an entry for IRPStackSize in the right pane, so I followed the instructions in the add - it and change it to decimal 15.
  I rebooted and tried to connect but still got the same error.
  The article said that the default value is 15, so I assumed that adding input IRPStackSize to 15 has not changed anything.

  So I went into regedit and changed the value of IRPStackSize of 15 to 18, restarted and it solved the problem.

  I found that the following articles is also useful in the resolution of this problem (aside from the one you gave):

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/285089

  http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/r0803/10r03/10r03.asp

  I typed this all this while this might help others who may encounter this same
  Error "not enough server storage is available to process this command" when you try to
  Map a network drive (or just try to connect) to a XP computer from another computer.

  Thanks much for the lead.

• How to change the transfer server repository

  Hello

  I made a mess!  Play with the new 4.5 ViewServer I configured transfer server repository directly on my server from view. Now, I created a real transfer server, but I can't change the repository, unless I stop to see serve. But if I stop View server I can't reconfigure the repository...

  This information is written anywhere in the server (or vCenter db)? In this case, I can edit the record in the Database.

  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  Davide

  in this tutorial http://paulslager.com/?p=624 is teaching you to install the server transfer, put in maintenance mode follow by adding the repository. Please do the opposite way that putting maintenance, then remove the transfer server and the repository will be deleted as well together.

  iDLE-jAM | SC 2, SC 3 & VCP 4

  If you have found this device or any other answer useful please consider useful or correct buttons using attribute points

• Discovers the problem of transfer Server - Service does not properly and maintenance in the waiting mode

  Hello. I have try to add view transfer Server Infrastructure and get the problems of follow-up:

  1. after that I have add forwarding server to "transfer servers" in the view manager, he is "on hold" and "missing transfer Server Repository. But on the record transfer servers 'System health' dashboard of my server in red and error is "the service does not work properly.

  2. If I try to put the server in maintenance mode, status is changed to "pending maintenance mode" and nothing happens at all. Server to remain in this State forever.

  I tried with two servers, Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 2003 Server R2. Both the same problem. I can't get another clue what is the problem.

  NIC is E1000, static IP and 'LSI Logic parallel' as a SCSI controller

  What can I do?

  Thanks for all replies.

  Change the role of the administrator of your view (or whatever the account that is used to manage the server transfer has role) on vCenter and put a tick in the box for Global-manage custom attributes.

  This fixed our environment, the index was in this error message on the display connection server.

  The error messages in the view ' 21: 51:50, ERROR 734 [ServiceConnection25] error when adding custom fields: [transfer Server Status, lock VM status] for type MB: VirtualMachine com.vmware.vdi.vcsupport25.ServiceConnection25. » addCustomFieldNames(SourceFile:1591)
  AxisFault
  faultCode: ServerFaultCode
  faultSubcode:
  "faultString: permission to perform this operation was denied."

  Aaron surfboard

• The Windows VM file server storage configuration options

  Hi all

  I have a Setup home of ESXi 3.5 running on an Adaptec 5805 with 3 x Western Digital 1 TB of drives in raid 5.  I plan on a number of virtual machines running on VMFS using virtual disks ranging from 10 to 20 GB.  Most of the storage is for the volume of a windows VM file server storage, somewhere around 1.5 to the mark.  Additional physical disks added to the Adaptec 5805 will be added for file server storage.  At least that's what I want to achieve

  My question is, what is the best option to add the windows VM storage file server because the VMs and storage are all on the same table?

  1. a large VMFS volume, add a virtual as extra storage space 1.5 TB drive to the VM file server and use scopes when you add additional physical disks in the array

  2. a single 300 GB partition on the table in the VMFS datastore for virtual machines, a score of 1.5 TB on the table in the VMFS datastore for storage file server disk.  Use scopes on the 1.5 TB data store when adding additional physical disks

  3. a single 300 GB partition on the table in the data store additional VMFS for VMs. the rest of the dashboard accessible from Raw Device Mapping for the 'normal' when you add storage of file server and extented with methods of expansion array physical disks

  4. something else non of the above makes no sense or it is technically impossible.

  Thank you very much for your time.

  Jon

  Hi Jon "Best" depends on what you want to accomplish, all 3 of your options 'will work '...

  1 & 2 gives you the flexibility to create files VMDK as space and allocation to different virtual machines, if you need to. So for your 1.5 to sample, you can decide you want 500 GB to go to VM1, VM2 250, etc. etc. Option #3 devoted himself primarily to the 1.5 TB on a virtual computer, whatever we have mapped ROW (the ROW will include the entire disk and outside the cluster configurations is only usable by a virtual machine).

  When you create a VMFS partition, you can choose the size of the block that fits your needs. For a 1.5 to drive you choose 8 MB so that you could create a VMDK file as large as the disc if you wanted (8 MB would give you an upper limit of 2 TB).

  Extensions will allow you to spend a single data store by adding disks, however another approach when adding drives is to create additional data store, and then create the VMDK files and link them in virtual machines as necessary (find yourself with "multiple" readers in the virtual machine).

• WinSxS swallow all my server storage space and fill C:Drives causing unstable Windows

  Hey there, I got a small cut of data center where we have virtualized 10.  Which most is Server 2008 standard with 4 x x64Bit version.

  I thought about creating a 75GB C partition would be more than enough space.  After about 9 months of use of torque with a 64 bit OS and Exchange 2010, I was up to 5 GB space on my C drive.  Fortunately, I had a load of spare to park my Exchange .edb files to remedy the problem of the lack of storage SAN.

  What MS is going to deal with this problem.  I'm lucky, I can just use extra storage space and make a difference.  What of those who pay for hosted solutions / storage.  This eventually cost them much more they may have planned to even if they copy actually that much data on the server.

  Surely MS will come out as its eems to be a cleaning tool or a patch to stop this issue more and more out of control.  Nobody seems to have a decent solution for this.  Woe to anyone brave enough to just go and delete files to free up space.

  Any ideas or advice greatly appreciated.

  Looking forward to hear from you.

  Glyn.

  Hello

  Welcome to Microsoft Windows 7 answers Forum!

  Note: your computer is under domain, you must contact the TechNet forum, where we have of the support technicians who are well equipped with the knowledge on area issues, to do that please visit the link provided below.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winservergen/threads

• Transfer and storage of Smartphones blackBerry media card

  My "BOLD" does not appear on my xp as a disc machine, so I am not able to transfer files in the manner of Windows.   Also the software BB Manage Office seems unable to transfer multimedia content as well.  It seems that the mini-usb cable to charge it but I am unable to have the Blackberry to interact with the computer.  I guess it had something to do with the parameters of mass storage but at this point or the pilots with 10 hours invested... I thought that I should throw the experts.   Thank you.

  Check this thread

• How to remove auto set the profile of the vcloud Director of storage

  Hello

  I would like to delete the free storage set the vcloud Director profile. But have no corresponding button, anyone has idea?

  I already removed "self storage defined profile" and "storage cap" vcenter.

  Thank you

  Simon

  Oh ~ ~
  Sorry about that, found that it remove the provider vDC.

  Thank you

• Cannot create a subscription to notifications vCloud Director (Server.setCustomProperty routine-cursor)

  Hello

  I'm having a problem when you use the workflow of subscription vCloud Director notification.

  When you try to add an AMQP broker using the workflow ' To create a subscription for notifications vCloud Director ' I get the error messages: "Value can not be supported by the custom property".

  The broker and the recipient are created.

  After doing some research, I see that the error occurs at the end of the workflow to the 'Set prop' custom task scriptable during the procurement of:

  If (routingKeyAtt! = null) Server.setCustomProperty (subscription, "routingKey", routingKeyAtt);

  No idea why I can't set this specific CustomProperty?

  no idea who to work around this problem?

  Thank you!

  All - I've updated the package of Notifications for 5.1 file found here: vCloud Director 5.1/5.5 blocking tasks and notification using AMQP package -please try this version, it should now allow the subscription as well as adding custom properties successfully create.

  UPDATED March 11, 2014: update to "Create a vCloud Director notifications subscription" workflow for working with vCloud Director 5.5. The change IS backward compatible with vCloud Director 5.1.

• See Transfer Server Questions

  I have a requirement to set up a forwarding server, and my question is, if the user data, such as My Documents are on back-end storage and redirected, when your desktop is extracted to the local computer, will be also removed user data. I don't think he will, because of the architecture of the product, as is check a new image. After the cut with the image, there should be access to data redeirected. When disconnecting from the local network, the redirected folders data will be always available on the image removed on the laptop? I'll test this, but wanted to know if anyone else has had this experience.

  Thank you

  Savoy 6

  If you need an offline office you should not redirect the user documents, etc.  Now, if you must, you can use offline folders and redirect their documents that you have visited.  But do so with caution as allowing it to all your virtual desktops would cause an enormous burden for your storage space.  This would increase the IOPS / s a little because she would try to cache all files offline for users of documents when opening session.