VCS 7.2 compatibility

Similar Questions

• Cisco telepresence video Communication Server (VCS) - compatibility CTX X8.1.1?

  The Cisco TelePresence Exchange System compatibility matrix (CTX) does not cover version of VCS X8.1.1 (to solve the problem of software). Version X7.2 is recommended and supported which is affected by "heartbleed".

  X8.1.1 compatibility is tested by Cisco and the updated matrix?

  In fact we run CTX v1.3 with VCS X7.2 and solve the problem of software without leaving the support. What is the recommendation of Cisco?

  Kind regards

  C.Opwis

  You could improve your VCS to X7.2.3 which includes a fix for Heartbleed.

• VCS with TMS Cisco compatibility

  Hi guys,.

  one of our clients runs on VCS x5.2, they plan to upgrade the VCS to X7.2.4 due to packet loss.

  could someone answer my query 2 below...

  1. make VCS 7.2.4 compatibility with TMS 13.2.2 with legacy agent? or x7.2.4 VCS support only the TMSPE?

  2. I saw a doc of Cisco, claiming that it will go to vcs x6.1 before going directly from 5.2 7.2.4. is it mandatory?

  Cordially Vigeesh

  The answers to your questions are in the X7.2.4 release notes:

  https://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VC...

  1.) Yes, no

  Yes 2).

• VCS 7.2 + TMS 13.2.1 + version TMSPE Movi/Jabber compatibility

  Hi, if I switch to 7.2 VCS + TMS 13.2.1 + TMSPE.

  Jabber/Movi will work with version 4.1 and 4.2?

  This is essential information as Jabber (4.4) update is not possible right now on all PCs.

  Tom br.

  Yes.

  We have everything from 4.0.1 to 4.5 Movi on the system we use in the office, I work in and run with TMS 13.2.1 X7.2

• Interoperability VCS control and Expressay - various versions

  Hi team,

  We settled on a client control VCS about 6 months. The customer has decided to buy, after this period, VCS highway as well.

  The version of VCS is x7.2 control and we are already in the version x8.2.1.

  My question is:

  There is some incompatibility between the VCS control version x 7 and VCS Expressway in x 8 version?

  Best regards

  VCS X7.2.x and X8.x backward compatibility were considered in depth since the published software X 8.  The following discussion is the latest X8.2 version that resolves the compatibility between versions X 7 and X 8 of the VCs.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/12240026/VCs-x82

  If you care to learn more about the compatibility of the software versions X 7 and X 8, you can take a look at this discussion, there are others out there as well, just look for them.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/11720871/VCs-Expressway-and-control-different-versions

• HDX 8000 on VCS not sending Video - H.264/H.323

  Hi guys,.

  I need a little help to make heads or tails of a few H.241/H.245 of e-mail that seems to show the VCS rejecting the video from the HDX 8000 registered as H.323. The other device in the call (opening) is a DX70. The HDX 8000 receives audio and video of the DX70, however the DX70 receives only audio. A capture of packets on the VCS shows no video of the HDX 8000, and media stats thus confirm the absence of video. I have the tool some diagnostic logs of the call which shows a rejection of OLC for H.264.

  Call flow is DX70-> CUCM-> SIP Trunk-> VCS-> HDX 8000

  I cut the video clips of sent TCS and OLC received underneath. I don't know what the problem is that my understanding of these protocols is quite limited, and I'm not sure what I can do on VCS or possibly CUCM to fix. The HDX 8000 has no support so I have more luck there.

  Apparently it worked for them before their call manager has been upgraded to 11 or so claimed. VCS is on 8.6

  Rejection of the OLC:

  Module = "Developer.IWF" level = 'ERROR' CodeLocation="ppcmains/oak/calls/iwf/IWFLCListMgr.cpp(315)" method = "IH245OLCRejResponseMsg::CauseCode IWFLCListMgr::updateInboundOLCListForOLC" = "0x7f749ed6f700" Thread: State = "IWFConnectedState" Global-CallId="2e9acc06-a188-4712-b9da-4698eca8d34f' Local-CallId="6d42819b-205d-454f-ae95-5a283199f74c' Sip-CallId ="[email protected]"/ * / ' Local-Tag = "f653265efcb77e05" Remote-Tag="2397002~70309dbf-e7dd-4b85-aad8-82d36153a410-45698833" H225-ip = "10.176.11.130" H225-port = "1720" H245-ip = "10.176.11.130" H245-port = '39551' last States = 'IWFAwaitingTCSState IWFAwaitingAckWithSdpAnswerState IWFAwaitingMSDCompleteState IWFSipConnectedConnectingH323State IWFConnectedState' received an OLC for cap: 0: [109] 90000 bitrate: 17920 hbits/s video H264 [tags = 2 profile_level_id = {profile_idc = 66 " [{, profile_iop = 0, level_idc = 13}, max_mbps = 23500, max_fs = 3840, max_br = 1500, packetization_mode = NAL] was in the CHT sent sideways H323, therefore not sending an OLC reject. The TCS has sent confined: Capset(2) contains 5 items for packaging: rfc3984nil

  Did a bit of translation for the params are collapsing, but I won't pretend that I really understand them.

  Video caps from TCS (VCS):

  videoCapability
  {
  genericVideoCapability:
  {
  standard capabilityIdentifier: {0 0 8 241 0 0 1},.
  maxBitRate 18560,
  collapse
  {

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 41, * profile: Basline profile
  parameterValue booleanArray: 64
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 42, * level: 2.2
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 57
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 3, * CustomMaxMBPS
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 534
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 4, * CustomMaxFS
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 34
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 8, * rcmd-nal-unit-maximum size
  parameterValue unsigned32Max: 256000
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 13, * not sure, can't find documentation on this
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 6000
  }
  }
  }
  }

  Video clips OLC received (from HDX):

  videodata data type: genericVideoCapability:
  {
  standard capabilityIdentifier: {0 0 8 241 0 0 1},.
  maxBitRate 17920,
  collapse
  {

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 41, * profile: Basline profile
  parameterValue booleanArray: 64
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 42, * level: 1.3
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 36
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 3, * CustomMaxMBPS
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 216
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 6, * CustomMaxBRandCPB
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 60
  },

  {
  standard parameterIdentifier: 4, * CustomMaxFS
  parameterValue unsignedMin: 15
  }
  }
  }

  What version of your Polycom software runs on?  We had a lot of problems with Polycom HDXs prior to version 3 of the software running.  It is highly recommended that you update the Polycom if it is on an older version, not only for reasons of compatibility, but also to address all security vulnerabilities in previous versions of the software (software, Shellshock, GHOST, etc.).

  Wayne
  --
  Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

• software compatibility

  Before I dive and upgrade to Sierra, I'm looking for a reliable source check the compatibility of the applications, I currently rely on.  Many are a bit dated.  Any suggestions?

  Main applications:

  Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 v 14.6.8

  Quicken for Mac 2007 v 16.2.4

  Photoshop CS5 x 64 new v12.0

  Roxio Toast 10 Titanium v 10.0

  Apple Pages, Numbers and Keynote ' 09

  Running OS X Lion mountain.

  Click here.

  (145086)

• I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5

  I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5. How this is done. Thank you very much.

  It is not possible to update Safari past 6.1.6 on Lion.

  (144969)

• How to: Crush 3/iMac 5 k (compatibility mode)

  Hello friends,

  I see quite a few new features on the market with Thunderbolt 3. According to the FAQ of TB3 Intel, TB1 and TB2 was designed with future upgrades in mind. This means that you can connect, once a solution is available, on a host of TB2 TB3 system using compatibility mode. It will only work to 20Gbps TB2, but work remains. The same is true of peripheral TB2 TB3 host computer (will work but at slower speed)

  This would be similar to the connection of a USB 3 device on a USB 2 or 1 USB host but only get speeds over slow or vice versa.

  
  

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters? What I've seen online seems to go using a device of TB2 and TB3 host and each of these adapters is Windows only. I have spent too many hours searching so I'm curious to know if someone has yet to fall on an adapter or converter that connect DisplayPort TB2 host and have the device USB-C/TB3 (USB - C not only) in compatibility mode.

  The reason? Peripheral TB3 are already less expensive than TB2 devices. I don't know who will get the most expensive. I don't care 40Gbps if he gives me a simple way to add multiple devices USB 3.0, exhibitions and maybe the eSata device. I know there are hubs, but I would prefer something that is the test of the future TB3 would be cheaper and future proof for NeXTGen computers.

  (Sorry for the TL; DR but it is always a person who does not read or "assume" it is a noob question and gives an answer "Captain Obvious". Don't BE this guy here...)
  

  Sincere greetings,

  Jorge Uptown

  JLopez. Chicago wrote:

  The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters?

  bolt-adapter https://www.StarTech.com/cables/Thunderbolt-3-cables/Thunderbolt-3-USB-c-Thunder ~ TBT3TBTADAP

  

• DIGITAL CAMERA RAW COMPATIBILITY UPDATE 6.21

  ***? How many times I have to do? I'm FED UP! I don't care ABOUT RAW! Update your program... I have

  NEVER USE!  NOT my computer!

  You're not talking Apple here.  It is a moderated forum for Apple to discuss features and troubleshooting. Apple-> system-> software update Preferences menu contains options to disable automatic downloads, although the Mac App Store update itself for Snow Leopard activates the automatic notifications of updates.  While a nuisance, you have just to tell more later, only choose to update once you have read the documentation to verify that its good operation with what you have.  Always back up your data before allowing updates.

  For direct feedback to Apple, who may have only one impact of future operating systems, http://www.apple.com/feedback

  If you find that a specific update has compatibility issues, we invite you to sign up for a free developer online account on http://developer.apple.com and submit a bug report to http://bugreporter.apple.com where you can know at least that if it's something reported before.  But this will not use or disclose this information here because of a confidentiality agreement.

• ANT or heart Bluetooth Monitor strap compatibility?

  That is, compatibility with A separate more specific ANT/Bluetooth Heart Monitor strap?

  Hello

  If preferred to use the integrated heart rate monitor, Apple Watch can measure your heart rate via an external pair Bluetooth chest strap cardiofrequence-meter.

  More information:

  Your heart rate. What it means, and where on Apple Watch you will find. -Apple Support

  Use the Bluetooth with your Apple Watch - Apple Support Accessories

• Corrupt Digital Raw compatibility update

  I have my macbook set to do automatic updates. I see a light red on the App Store, which shows an updated - and when I check it said provision, "Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20. I scroll down and see that it has installed this update even at least 10 times start on 13 August through 24 August! Even updated, same version and I think it's a corrupted file or virus! Help, I want to stop saying that I need to update!

  Hello cdaniels31.

  Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. I understand that the Digital Raw compatibility update, version 6.20 performed several times, but the App Store there is always a full update. I am pleased to provide you with advice for this problem.

  First of all, let me put your mind at ease. It is an updated official Apple for the compatibility of the RAW for OS X El Capitan image, not a virus. It seems that OS X is not recognizing that it was already done.

  Let's start troubleshooting by restarting your MacBook. Then we will try to complete the update by using the link below, instead of using the App Store.

  Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20

  Finally, restart your MacBook, once more.

  Kind regards.

• Compatibility «?» (Mac Pro Tower / Firewire / climax together, etc..)

  I take Logic Pro 9, but after looking at all the improvements for Logic Pro X, I can't wait to get up to speed.

  I like the look of the improvements to the plug-in; logic adding distance (not available for LP9?); Drum Kit Designer, synthesizer, etc.

  When he (LP10) announced that there is a flagrant limitation I had with my current set-up but I don't remember what the hiccup was... perhaps there is none and I could be good-to-go.  Can anyone confirm if and where I'm looking at compatibility problems?

  System: Mac Pro Tower (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xenon

  OS: 10.10.5 (Yosemite)

  Interface: Climax together - Firewire

  If I remember, the question I met was first introduced with the announcement of Logic Pro X was he needed El Capitan - which did not offer the divers "Core Audio" / support, which means that overall height (Firewire) would be uncertain if even not work at all.  "" Looking at the "tech specs" on Logic Pro X, it supports OS X 10.10.  That looks promising (if it in fact the issue with El Capitan and the lack of support for Core Audio driver still exists).

  Can I run Logic Pro X to Yosemite?

  Can I run overall height (FireWire) in El Capitan without the Core Audio Driver issues / Firewire?

  Thanks in advance!

  I must add, additional hardware, I am running is a UAD PCI card in the tower.

• compatibility update

  Hi I'm still stuck with Firefox and their nasa night launch addon - belt LavaFox & BlackFox Orions w / Grim Reaper (one who is all black, no shit bar gray and the drop-down boxes are black with white writing), it's the best setup I like for my computer and I've just updated to the new firefox and it is incompatible? I tried to download the other launch night nasa and that ' s when I got pissy gray bar and white drop-down boxes (shit) so I had to remove firefox and download a previous version of 2014 to correct the problem and disable all future updates.
  How you do this? you boast of personalization and are never compatible previous addons, that I don't want any other addons that this ive got! I think it's the best it is its completely black all the boxes included and somehow you will find it is too hard to make sure that all the addons have a single line of code that is also added to your updates, so they all work together and now I can't update and continue my experience with firefox now I am looking for the alternative browser options that give me what I like and allow me to keep it because it is always, unless I'm finding that you took my situation seriously and we will integrate the compatibility section of addon for all the new updates.

  Yours Sincerely
  Disgruntled users

  You were able to use this theme through 41 of Firefox, but it stopped working in Firefox 42?

  I think others have mentioned problems with the complete themes in Firefox 42, but I don't remember the details. I hope an update will come.

  In the meantime, rather than running a version with known security vulnerabilities, you might consider another variant of Firefox called the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is currently based on Firefox 38 with a few security updates. It is unlikely to have any change relating to the compatibility of the Add on, until next year.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.4.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) to rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\FxOld
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\FxOld
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in this FxOld file. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \FxOld\Plugins
  • \FxOld\browser\plugins

• Why can't Norton Identity Safe compatibility be integrated into the latest versions of Firefox? IE seems not to have problems with it.

  Firefox constantly asks me to upgrade to the latest version, which is not a problem as long as the new generation is compatible with applications that I serve throughout and rely on every day. I use the 40.0.3 version and it wants me to update to 41.0.2. If the Norton Identity Safe toolbar work with my current version of Firefox, what is the compatibility issue with a newer version of Firefox? IE does not appear to have this problem of update... which makes me consider the switch back to IE as my default browser. I rely on the Identity Safe to take care of my connection problems, and there is no need to deal with problems of incompatibility. I know I'm not alone in finding this aggravation with updates. (I use Win7 Home Premium, 64-bit).

  Sorry, this is a change in the types of code Add - ons are allowed to include. It was supposed to change in Firefox 40, but at the request of vendors such as Symantec, it was postponed to 41 of Firefox. I don't think this change will flip over. Norton is working on a new version, but I understand that it takes longer than expected.

  Here's what I suggest for users who need Norton password security features:

  Instead of freezing your Firefox on a non secure version, consider using the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is designed for businesses that require a cycle time longer between changes to the features, but anyone can use it. ESR is currently based on Firefox 38. It will get updates of security over the coming months, but not to get new features, so changes in Firefox 41 concerning the compatibility of the add-on will not be out for a good time.

  Norton is likely to continue to support the ESR until the new toolbar update is finished, maybe next month. After that, I don't know what they will do because normally they don't take over a small range of versions.

  If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:

  Clean reinstall it

  We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.

  (A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.3.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).

  (B) the release of Firefox (if any).

  (C) simply rename the program folder, either:

  (Windows 64-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files (x86)\Fx41
  

  (Windows 32-bit folder names)

  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
  

  TO

  C:\Program Files\Fx41
  

  (D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.

  Success?

  Note: Some plugins can only exist in the old folder. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:

  • \Fx41\Plugins
  • \Fx41\browser\plugins