version of vSphere 4 to deploy, secure and analyze

Similar Questions

• Deploy, secure and analyze the class

  We send someone for the class to deploy, secure and analyze VMWare.  Everyone has been through this training before?  Basically, we have our want someone trained to develop our strategy of VMWare and VMWare infrastructure upward and running out.  We have enough credits to send someone to a class, but did not have someone out for any training yet.  We really wanted to send someone to the installation and configuration of class, simply because we believe that we've moved past that point and are in the region to try to improve our VMWare environment.  Our concern is that the class to deploy, secure and analyze you have to take a test online as a sine qua non.  Someone at - experienced this little test before and can tell us that some basic information about it?  Just really looking at how in depth, the test is.  Are they mainly check if we can move with skill a Linux command line and have the basics of ESX and VMWare Infrastructure or are testing much more than that?

  Welcome to the Forums - as ex-instructeur you'd find value in the class install and configure even if you went further in your environment - the I & class C is a well-appointed class and develop a good solid base for VI - 3 - several times I have students who had worked with VMware for some time to the observation of end class for me that they thought they'd be bored and we were just to become a VCP but got a lot of valuable information. that being said the preliminary test of the DSA was actually developed to ensure that students have had an appropriate level of knowledge so that they would benefit form the DSA class - so that it covers the end of ESX concepts, don't know if virtual center and virtualization - to get the best bf both worlds that you took a peek at the Fast Track class - she actually covers the material of the two classes in 5 days - you have enough credit for this.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• I get the following message:-Firefox 35.0.0.5486 this new version of Firefox contains important security and bug fixes and page offers much improved making it

  I have received several messages inviting me to download the software updates that I use. I think they are attempts to get help with phishing or such. The last "software update available" amplifies - "this new version of Firefox contains an important security and bug fixes, and much improved page rendering times offer." Is generated by anyone at Mozilla, or automatically in Mozilla? Mozilla distributes these types of messages? That Firefox is updated automatically, then these messages should have no useful function except to help with the download of some intrusive camera, which I did not need. Are there plug-ins that I should throw?

  Upgrade to Firefox 35 is currently limited and not everyone gets the new update offered at this time.
  If this is the case for you, then you can manually update via help > topic.

  See also:

  • https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/35.0/releasenotes/
  • https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/all/

• BlackBerry Smartphones impossible to disable the password security and encryption

  HelloW, I am currently using,
  BlackBerry 9780
  Smartphone (3G, Wi - Fi)
  6.0 bundle 3049 (v6.0.0.706, platform 6.6.0.246)
  Band 3G 1,2,5,6
  The kernel v3.8.6.5 encryption
  Brand version: 1.0.99.538J
  The micro Edition configuration: CLDC-1. 1
  Micro Edition profile: MIDP - 2.1
  Micro Edition JTWI Version: 1.0
  Micro Edition Media Version: 1.1
  Micro Edition PIM Version: 1.0
  Micro Edition file Version: 1.0
  Edition micro Bluetooth Version: 1.1
  Micro Edition location Version: 1.0.1
  Micro Edition Security and Trust Services (APDU) Version: 1.0
  WLAN Version: 4.3.0.9
  (Research In Motion Limited)
  Now the problem is that I'm not able to disable password insecurity,
  (Homescreen > options > Security > password), there is a small latch (yellow lock symbol). Another problem is that I am also able to disable encryption, there is a tick mark on who. And there is one symbol of a padlock, please help me da information thereon, after every 20 minutes my B.B gets locked and I asks me to put the password of da, I want what it b done with the company.
  Thank you.

  Hello and welcome to the community!

  From what you describe, there is a COMPUTER on your BB policy which is demanding both encryption and a password for the device-lock. If you are currently on the BES, then STOP NOW and see your BES admins they control it.

  If you are not on BES, somehow your BB has a COMPUTING policy... the cause maybe it was once associated with BES, but not properly deleted when the property was transferred to you. If all goes well, there will be other problems that often comes with "2nd hand" situations. In any case, you can check this:

  • KB30076 How to check for an it on a BlackBerry smartphone policy

  Even if does not appear as described, from what you have described, there is probably a COMPUTER policy that is causing this (some may be "hidden"). To remove it, first make sure you have a good backup of your BB... See the link in my sig auto on this post for instructions. Then do this:

  • KB31291 How to reset a BlackBerry smartphone to factory using BlackBerry Desktop Software Settings

  Thereafter, your BB will be as new... you need to re - install your applications and restore your data (according to the backup you took my instructions above). BUT - when you restore data, DO NOT make a full restore... rather, only restore these databases you need (e.g., Contacts, calendar, Messages, etc.) and more precisely to avoid those who have nothing to do with the COMPUTER policy, company or similar things... If you restore, you will be right where you started.

  Good luck and let us know!

• .ovf created on vsphere deployed 5.0 on the old version of vsphere

  Quick question, someone each deployed an ovf file that was created on 5.0 in an older version of vsphere.

  We do this in the future.  So, it's a pre-emptive question to see if anyone had to do this or any issues that may arise.

  Thank you

  Hello and welcome to the communities.

  Check out this discussion.

  Good luck!

• I don't like the newer versions. Will be my change of 6.02 version if I install 31.4.0 security and stability update?

  After trying a few recent versions of Thunderbird, I have fortunately returned to 6.02, which has what I like for my profiles.

  For the last few days I get insistent messages to download 31.40 security and stability update. But I do not use this version.

  So my two questions are:

  (1) I need these updates for version 6.02?

  (2) if I download updates my version will change to 31.4.0?

  Thank you.

  Version 6 is old enough. You skipped a lot of upgrades.

  If you load the updates go you to the version of the upgrade. This is why's called it an upgrade.
  Personally, I stayed at the version 24.6 because of all the problems that versions 31 and to have shown so far. They could be close to those of problems now and when they do I will move to the top.

• To extract information of deployed services and their version number

  We have an EM environment where in we deployed composite applications. We have more than one partition with number of services deployed in them. We want to extract the details of deployed services and their versions in each partition of a file stored in a file or a table if it is stored in the table. We are not sure if this information is stored in a file or a table. Rather than pick manually the console each time, we want it be retrieved in a file or table will help us control the versions of the deployed services. Please help in this regard.

  Using Ant-ant - sca - mgmt.xml listCompositesInPartition f, we obtain details of composites deployed in a particular partition.

• Tips for starting the deployment vCenter and vSphere

  Well, so here's my question, and maybe it's a long one.

  I intend to deploy vSphere/vCenter deployment soon, and I am currently considering a network isolated for management stuff.  My understanding is that to get there, you have ESXi hosts to configure a NETWORK card that is connected to a remote switch and then assign IPs on the same subnet for each machine.  So that's what I would do.  NICs will be connected to a separate switch for the vMotion and the virtual machines on the host computers.

  This leaves me in a quandry minor, however.  I would like to get vCenter configuration on a virtual computer.  And vCenter must be able to communicate with the domain for the domain controllers, right?  What I would do is vCenter configuration, configuration of the distributed vSwitches and hang them up to the network adapters that are connected to the internal network (and therefore the domain controllers) and make sure that everything works correctly.  Once it's over, I want to put in place a couple of VMs who will take over the functions of the DCs and from there, the majority of the servers on the network of virtualization.  Yahoo!

  So, here's the problem, I can say.  If I want the management network server ESXi to be isolated with their own IP addresses, how is the vCenter VM supposed to communicate with the inside network where are domain controllers, because I won't have any installation of vSwitches to other network adapters, because I need to vCenter to create these vSwitches, etc..  Chicken and eggs?  I'm sure that someone has addressed and solved this problem before.  Help?

  Yes, it is what we have done to the SC for the VI Center and each host.  We use a non routable subnet for our network of Vmotion.

  Sorry I havn't been referred in the community forum, because I answered.

  If you have found this device or any other answer useful please consider the use of buttons useful or appropriate to award marks.

• replication with different versions of vSphere vSphere

  After reviewing the matrix of interoperability of products, everything "looks" good, but caring for a second opinion.  See below:

  Environment:

  • vCenter 6 sites
  • PSC external sites
  • Protected site is vSphere 5.5 Update 2 or 3
  • Recovery site is vSphere 6.0 U2
  • vSphere 6.1 replication
  • 6.1 SRM

  Issues related to the:

  Can anyone confirm the support in regards to the different version of vSphere protected and recovery site?

  Are there related shades to have different versions of vSphere protected and recovery site?

  We can successfully failover to the recovery site, reprotect VMs to protected site and be restored in a site protected without problem?

  Different versions of vSphere are supported to recover protected site and as you have configured, it is recommended to have the new version on the recovering site. The reason for this and be careful about the different versions, has to do with the versions of virtual equipment. VMware ESX can run VMs with earlier versions of virtual hardware, but not later (came out after the version of vSphere). You want to make sure that your virtual machines will run on the host on the recovering site. If you are using a later version of vSphere to recovery, as long as you deploy new virtual machines when running it, or if you do this, you use a virtual hardware version that is compatible with the hosts what was your site protected, you will never come across the problem of trying to recover a virtual machine with the hardware version that is incompatible with vSphere.

  Issues related to the:

  Can anyone confirm the support in regards to the different version of vSphere protected and recovery site? -Yes

  Are there related shades to have different versions of vSphere protected and recovery site? -See above

  We can successfully failover to the recovery site, reprotect VMs to protected site and be restored in a site protected without problem? -Yes (see above)

  Does make sense?

• SRM requires the same version of vSphere in both places?

  We need to quickly implement SRM, I know that is not the way to do it, but it is a decision that I am not charged. We will use SRM 5.1.  I have not read the documentation of SRM totally still, but I hope someone can answer me this:

  Do we need to run the same version of vSphere in both places?

  Site A (Production):

  -vSphere 4.1 (updated anything) Enterprise - because our material is NOTon the compatibility list for something more recent

  -vCenter 5.1 - Let's fix our current server vCenter Server 4.1 to 5.1

  Site B (DR):

  -vSphere 4.1 U2 (or newer) company - this material is NOT identical to that site but is compatible with 4.1 U2 thru 5.1

  -vCenter Server 5.1

  We have here a viable solution?

  Thanks for the help.

  You're right that MRS requires 3rd party replication or VMware vSphere replication (or you can use the two together).  SRM itself doesn't replicate anything, she orchestrates and manages the recovery of virtual machines protected by these other mechanisms.

  If you do not have the option of replication of the table, then you must use vSphere replication.

  VR, however, is a function of the ESXi core appeared in 5.0.  He is by nature a part of the hypervisor itself, so he needs to a 5.x or higher host to use, it's is not an authorization to issue at all.

  To use VR, you will need the hosts on both sites to use 5.x - site source must 5.x use the Filter/agent in the core that produced the data from the replica.

  My * personal * take on it's you would be best served to stand up for VC 5.1 on both sites, and then upgrade your hosts to 5.1, and then deploy appliances virtual RV (used to manage replication and register the service with VC), can protect certain virtual machines so that you get used to the behavior of VR, then put the RS on top (5.1 on the two sites) and start building protection of groups and the stimulus packages and others.

• Last update of security and Build ID

  Hi people,

  Simple question of El Cap here I hope...

  Anyone know why the last update of security (updated 2016-001) changed the version number? Now our Mac Book Pro and our iMac 5 k both show a build number of 15 1004. They had their own unique IDS. Which is what we used to identify our imaging process.

  Thoughts?

  We are the only users. We are not Apple. Only they can answer your question. For now, Apple wanted to change the version number to determine if the security update has been installed.

• "A security and stability update for FF has bee n dnlded & ready 2 B is installed" updated: FF 37.0.2, but 37.0.1 is more recent. What to do?

  Received a Firefox "Software Update" which says: "a security and stability update FF has been downloaded and is ready to be installed" Update: FF 37.0.2
  Message has the ability to restart now or later. I'm on ver 37.0.1 and FF says it's the MOST RECENT! Is - this safe (from Mozilla) or an attempt to scam/Phishing? What to do?

  Firefox 37.0.2 is indeed a valid version

  https://www.Mozilla.org/Firefox/all/
  https://www.Mozilla.org/Firefox/37.0.2/releasenotes/

• Security and privacy setting problem

  I have a MacBook Pro, school issued, and I have an administrator account. It is El Capitan version 10.11.4 running

  For a few weeks and I don't know exactly when it started, it was disconnect automatically. In addition, when it disconnects me my password is not always recognized as correct, so I have to reboot to reconnect. I finally found the setting of security and confidentiality that is checked for disconnection after 30 minutes of inactivity and unchecked, it.  However changes to the settings I do not stay, I uncheck the box or change the amount of time before disconnection, he returns in this journal of 30 minutes setting. As a teacher in a busy class I find that more and more frustrating. I can't afford this waste of time if I need to show something to the class on the Board of directors or to find a resource. Can anyone help?

  I guess you just change your connection password, but desynchronization between account password and login Keychain password. You need access to Keychain Access-> Preferences, select 'Synchronize password Keychain with account'. Preferences and access to quick access-> S.o.s. Keychain keychain and repair.

• The latest update of firefox is not compatible with trend micro security and people with disabilities, it's when I clicked on install. How to bring back my trend micro?

  I downloaded a firefox security update. When I clicked on install (or apply), I was told it disabled my security from trend micro, and there is no version compatible with trend micro. He told me they keep control and let me know what is available. NOT GOOD. I paid a lot of money for my trend micro and want it to be functional. Help! I didn't click on finish. Does that mean the upgrade is not installed and that trend micro still works?

  I seem to have fixed that by going to the site of Trend Micro and upgrade to the latest version of Trend Micro Titanium 2012 V5.0. It uninstalled the previous version on my computer and then install the latest version. Trend Micro is working now and I can browse with Firefox. The upgrade was free.

• I am currently running windows essentials security and avast antivirus and antispyware protection security - is enough? I need Mcafee or Norton or are they the same thing?

  What is the best protection virus out there - see my present programs

  You should not run two antivirus programs. Microsoft Security Essentials versus Avast Security and uninstall what you don't want. With a good antivirus and the built-in Windows Firewall on XP I wish I had the free version of Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware installed. Update/run it manually once a week or more. You don't need anything else except a smart user.

  http://www.getsafeonline.org/
  https://www.mysecurecyberspace.com/
  http://www.GetNetWise.org/
  http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/staying-safe.PDF

  Too much security is detrimental:

  http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/Too_Much_Security.PDF

  MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!