VI running on an Instance of Application EXE computer remote?

Similar Questions

• Computer runs slowly, several instances of dllhost.exe and svchost.exe consumes large amounts of CPU and RAM, please help!

  So it is currently 05:49 where I am right now and I've lost sleep over this issue these days.  My computer went from fast to slow apparently all night and I cannot understand why.  I downloaded Malwarebytes and ESET Nod 32 Antivirus free and I have Avira.  I have scoured the sysinternals Process Explorer and cannot find the root of the problem, and I just need someone better than me to help me with this problem.  I will follow all rules or guidelines, I'd really appreciate just for help!  Thank you!

  I mean not kind of, but not in a concrete way.  I backed up all my hard drive on a USB of terra, reset my computer at the store settings, basically wiping and just re - download the essential.  In fact, it works better than ever, now that it is cluttered with.  It seems barbaric, but he did a lot.

• Computer with Windows XP running slow and what is Svchost.exe?

  Original titile: my Acer One ZG 5 is apparently very slow a file called scvhost.exe (I think) eats memory. What can I do?

  My Acer One ZG 5 is apparently very slow a file called scvhost.exe (I think) eats memory. What can I do?

  What is useful or even possible to upgrade to windows 7?

  Hello

  Svchost.exe is a process on the computer that hosts, or contains, other individual services that Windows uses to perform various functions. For example, Windows Defender uses a service that is hosted by a svchost.exe process.

  There may be multiple instances of svchost.exe running on your computer, each instance containing different services. One instance of svchost.exe can host a single service for a program, and another instance can host several services related to Windows. You can use Manager tasks to display services running under each instance of svchost.exe.

  To view the services that are running under svchost.exe:

  (a) open the Manager the tasks by right-clicking on the taskbar and then click Task Manager.
  (b) click on process tab.
  (c) If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
  (d) Hovering mouse on one of the processes will show you a list of all the services.

  You mentioned that your computer is running slowly. Follow the troubleshooting method specified in the link here.

  Method: Follow the steps for Windows XP.

  How to make a computer faster: 6 ways to speed up your PC

  http://www.Microsoft.com/atwork/maintenance/speed.aspx#fBid=ZX7S9AI1uI1

  You can follow the steps here to upgrade Windows XP to Windows 7.

  Upgrade Windows XP to Windows

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/help/upgrading-from-Windows-XP-to-Windows-7

  See this link:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx#fBid=I9GWec8FSz3

  Email us if you have any further questions. We will help you.

• LabVIEW run engine time included in the application exe

  Hi all

  Back in LabVIEW 5, we could create a single LabVIEW application exe file that included the execution engine (all in a single exe file). Now, we must install the runtime engine in its own right + the LabVIEW application exe. I don't think that someone knows a way to create LabVIEW application exe files which include the execution engine in new versions of LabVIEW.

  I know that we can install the runtime automatically during the installation of the LabVIEW application.

  I know also it makes more sense to have the execution time separate from the application of updates etc, but in some cases its nice just have a program obviously installed on the system - the application of interest.

  Any soloutions neat known?

  -Martin

  The time of applications from a single file is long gone. The current LabVIEW runtime engine is a great combination of many files, including DLLs, interface model files user etc. It is not always necessary, but even the most trivial LabVIEW application today takes several tens of these files at startup even. That's how things have changed, and although there are indeed efforts to get apps to run from one place to put them on a USB key for example, LabVIEW is not really a system that lends itself to this. In LabVIEW 7.1 and 8.0, you could include virtually all of the files that make up the runtime system in the same folder as your executable file, no NOR never argued that neither they will probably move to make. With some trial and error, you can start deleting files and see if your app still worked then, but it's a tricky procedure since the application could often start very well, but suddenly encounter display problems if you have opened a subscreen or something with this subject-specific objects.

  You can probably try to simply copy all the files from the LabVIEW Runtime folder in your executable file and there is a chance that it still works, but what for? The size of the facility remains basically the same and if you happen to install both applications on the same computer, each contains a copy of all of the runtime system, so there is no gain more but in fact a setback.

  The interdependencies of these modules are complicated and some need additional components and registry settings to work properly. By offering a way to configure individually that you want to include, and what would be a total pita for the end user that nobody would really understand what is needed for what and why. Experience would be so especially try it doesn't work once, and never use it again.

  I never thought to look into this latest version of LabVIEW. Time to figure it all out is simply average too much punishment for the small gains you get. Installers are the norm these days.

  Another issue that followed, is that you need to monitor all the Security Advisory reports NOR and other bugfixes and act on them yourself whenever a component that you have added in your application must be updated. As it is now, the NI Updater can and will update the plant installed according to enforcement system and all is well.

• only one instance of wusa.exe is allowed to run

  I'm not able to have any windows update more on Windows 7.

  When I tried to download the update manually and install, it gives me this error "that one instance of wusa.exe is allowed to run.

  I'm sure that there are no cases of wusa.exe running. I looked everywhere and nothing.

  I even tried in safe mode. same mistake.

  I went to the extreme, I renamed the file in wusa.old safe mode. then I restarted windows. and made sure he was not running. but when I renamed it wusa.exe and just tried to run the update file, I got the same stupid mistake.

  any help in this? !!

  Caroline Taylor,
  These give a try and we do know:
  Clean boot your PC, and then run Windows Update.

  Reset the Windows Update components

  Mike - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Photosmart 7510 running multiple instances of HPNetworkCommunicator.exe

  I have several instances of HPNetworkCommunicator.exe being run, but only 1 printer configured.  An escalation manager HP/engineer? connected to my PC to help solve a problem that I had with Efax.  He used a tool of the scrubber and left all instances previous HP printers I had and then reinstalled the PhotoSmart 7150 software.

  Everything worked fine after that.  However, Windows did an update on my computer and after that I could not the scanner, no printer software worked (to check the ink levels, scanner, etc...).  Responsible for the escalation, said there are problems with Windows updates because after the update, Windows does not see the printer as a scanner and it is a threat to the network, so it disables the scan from the printer part.

  He has reinstalled the printer that a printer wireless and then scan will work again.  However, he had several (3) instances of HPnetworkCommunicator.exe running after that.

  I went into the control panel and saw 2 7510 s PhotoSmart configured, so I deleted one of the printers.  I thought that's why there are several instances of HPneworkCommunicator running, and delete the redundant printer would solve the problem.

  I rebooted and checked everything was working on the printer.  However, I have yet 2 instances of HPnetworkCommunicator running.  Is this normal?

  Hello

  It is normal to have more than one instance running at the time sime because of several communication actions occouring simultanly (e.g. alerts of ink. Front panel to scan, the device status, etc..)

  This is the mode of operation of the specific software version.

  If you see the affected PC performance, it's another story.

  For such a question, I would recommend you to set the alert of ink as shown below, restart the PC and check any changes:

  http://support.HP.com/us-en/document/c03191239

  If performance is still affected, also disable the front panel scan option.

  If the software does not affect the PC somehow, you have really not hae any reason to take action.

  Kind regards

  Shlomi

• The Windows Task Manager shows two instances of HpqPhUnl.exe running under XP

  My windows Task Manager shows two instances of HpqPhUnl.exe Runnung.

  * original title - why do I have two HpqPhUnl.exe race? *

  Are you using the quick change of user with more than one user connected and are both instances of HpqPhUnl.exe running under different user names?

  Although it is always possible for malware to masquerade as a legitimate file, HpqPhUnl.exe is related to the HP Photosmart Essential software provided with printers HP all-in-one.

  It seems there were several problems with Photosmart Essential and HP has replaced with HP Photo Creations.  HP claims, however, that he "supports" always Photosmart Essential.  See http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c02475046&lc=en&dlc=en&cc=us&product=3857372

  If you have any problems and you're just curious, I suggest you leave the pretty well after scanning with the following just in case two free tools:

  MalwareBytes Anti-Malware
  SUPERAntiSpyware

  If you experience problems with your HP software - and the scans do not present any malware - I suggest to ask in the forums HP (there are 3: consumer, Business and IT resources.)

• Impossible to install the software to receive error message like "16-bit MS-DOS subsystem config.nt msiexec.exe file system not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Applications."

  Hello

  Original title: problem installing the software
   
  When my wife tries to install software (for example the updates of Windows or Itunes) on his Dell laptop (Windows Vista Home Premium), she gets this error developed box.
  "the 16-bit MS-DOS subsystem
  The msiexec.exe config.nt file this system is not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Applications. »
  Grateful for any ideas on how to fix this problem!

  Hello

  1. what 16-bit or software program you try to run? Should I use the CD Rom drive?

  2 - is the question also appear during the installation of Windows updates?

  3. have you made changes on the computer before this problem?

  Follow the methods and check them out below:

  Method 1: Perform a clean boot and check.

   

  To help resolve the error message, you can start Windows Vista or Windows 7 by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  
  Please note:  After troubleshooting, be sure to start your computer in normal mode by following step 7.

  Method 2:

  Run an analysis of auditor of system files on your computer and check for the issue.

  How to use the System File Checker tool to fix the system files missing or corrupted on Windows Vista or Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

  Method 3: Solve problems with programs that cannot be installed or uninstalled

  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall

  Hope the above information is helpful.

• Task Manager Windows has 5 svchost.exe/System cases and 3 instances of YahooWidgets.exe/Owner running in XP SP3

  I did a few recommended lately on the system settings.  I don't remember see these multiple entries above.

  It is normal to have several copies of svchost.exe appears in the Task Manager.  I have 8 right now in the process of execution.

  Important XP Services running "behind" these entries of svchost.exe.  Some svchost.exe process may have just XP Service running behind her, an another svchost.exe process can have several XP Services running behind it.

  In addition, malicious software has been know to dress up like a svchost.exe process to deceive you or sometimes the malware will hide behind a svchost.exe process, because he knows that you won't be able to see it in the Task Manager.

  I don't know what YahooWidgets and do not want to install any YahooWidgets to find out how it works, or if this is normal.

  Thanks to the bad implementation of the MS Answers forums, we know absolutely nothing about your system is always a good idea before troubleshooting to run some respectable scans for malware, then I'll give you some instructions, if you're curious to see what happens behind these multiple svchost.exe process see you in Manager tasks.

  No matter what you use for malware protection, follow these steps:

  Download, install, update, and make at least an analysis full (not at the same time) with these free malware detection programs:
  Malwarebytes (MMFA): http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
  SUPERAntiSpyware: (SAS): http://www.superantispyware.com/

  These comprehensive analyses can take some time, but you really need to run.  SAS will probably be just a bunch of Internet tracking cookies, but you can remove them.  Once you have done at least a full analysis, you can do quick scans in the future to save time and save the analyses complete for when you have more time or are really suspicious of an infection of the system.

  They can be uninstalled later if you wish.

  To help understand your processes svchost.exe and what is running under them, read this article and you will be smarter than the average bear:

  http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/tutorial129.html

  You may be able to get clues with what is happening with your svchost.exe process using the Task Manager and maybe understand.

  You will always be able to understand what is happening with your svchost.exe process if you use Process Explorer.

  Download Process Explorer, so you can see what is 'really' running on your system, especially behind those svchosts several process see you in the running task manager.

  Download Process Explorer from here:

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/Sysinternals/bb896653.aspx

  You'll like Process Explorer when you get the hang of it.  Process Explorer is the Manager of Windows taskbar on steroids.

  Process Explorer installs nothing so it won't slow down your system since it works only on request.

  Process Explorer can seem a little intimidating at first because it has so much information, but you will begin to make love the way it works when you're looking for performance problems.   You can even say EP you want it to be your new default 'Task Manager' value in the future.  You can always run the original tasks as Manager.

  Once you get Process Explorer running, expand the columns, made drag the corners of the screen for it's largest, etc., so you can see as much information as possible in the window.  Now you can really see what is running on the system.

• Multiple instances of rundll32.exe in Windows 7 Premium using all RAM - no viruses detected by MSE but PC runs slowly

  Processor: AMD Athlon (TM) 9750 Quad-Core 2.40 GHz

  4,00 (3.75 usable) GB RAM

  System: 64 - bit OS with Genuine Microsoft Windows 7 Premium (purchased separately with distributor online PC)

  At startup, there are three instances of rundl32l.exe with no path name Image displayed in the Task Manager.

  The three were separated from the PID of 1624, 1634 and 1644.

  None has an associated user name.

  Used private working memory is listed as 128K, 344K, 520K.

  Commit size is listed as 1, 036 K, 1 864 K and 1 940 K.

  List page 717, 1 731, and 2 044 defects

  Note that the following persons have no associated user name, until I log in as an administrator:

  Csrss.exe, nwsvc.exe, until I log in as an administrator, date at which all are listed as belonging to the user of the system.

  There are two instances of csrss.exe after I login as an administrator to monitor the system.

  Note that as soon as I open MSIE (worm: 9.0.8112.162421 64-bit Edition |) Update: 9.05 (KB2647516) | Encryption level: 256-bit)
  The use of the RAM dropped to 1.04 BG of the GB available total 3.75, jumped but still once 3.14 GB and the balloons of the use of network.

  as soon as I logged as administrator.  There are multiple instances open for svchost.exe attributed to the system, network and Local Service.

  Since I use MacAfee and Microsoft Security Essentials and have found a problem, I wonder if there is a virus that creates multiple

  run32dll.exe and this according to the capacity of detection of these two programs.

  You know, it's more difficult to follow all the news - just to get a response.  I've restored as soon as possible, has got rid of the programs and the remains, then reinstalled MSE and updated, and, Yes, the computer is updated and better now with the improvement of power, video card and without an easy way to trace this information (you know a feature of Windows that would follow easily everything you ask?) - it seems a big eater of real-time , for questionable results.  I thought that Windows 7 Ultimate would have included more administration tools just to log on and view, copy, paste, rather than the back-and-forth necessary to fill out a form that is as unique as it is not shoot all the tools.  I see that much info required users, and where is the forensic tools easy to use a computer owner should have?  Malware authors certainly use them.  The average owner must be at least as good a handle on reports on what's happening, everything down to the core.

  Any tips?

• Application exe missing vi sub

  Hello

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Kind regards

  Hari

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Kind regards

  Hari

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Hello

  Sorry for the post above.

  Here clearly displayed.

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Kind regards

  Hari

• VI in Application.exe missing Sub

  Hello

  I did based on PCI 6221 DAQ card applications.

  I build application.exe.

  I build Installer 1) 2010 runtime engine) 2 DaqMX drivers included.

  When I installed and run the application on the client computer.

  It gives the error code 3.

  No source files were found. Missing Sub Vi.

  Are all the missing Sub vi associated DAQmx.

  I found that all the Vi Sub required file Exists in the installation folder.

  One please solve the problem.

  Kind regards

  Hari

  I got it it works fine now.

• How to develop the final application exe file that will work on PC not installed labview

  Hello

  I developed a labview application (I request manufacturers/builders and professional license).

  I generate the final exe file by the tools of-> built Application exe of VI-> fact file

  But this the application exe file runs only on machines installed labview. His works do not on the other PC.

  For the execution of the other PC I have to do.

  Hello Ramji,

  As you said, EXE is created by you and its nning ruou fine on the PC where you created such as LabVIEW is present there.

  So for LV CE, please create an installer and Add Installer/additional software required by your EXE.

  Look at the link for reference.

  http://www.NI.com/white-paper/5406/en

  Kind regards

  Leila

  CLD

• Creation of LV8.5 application EXE, Error 1502

  Hello

  I am building an application .exe of my code of LabView8.5. This is my first time doing so.

  My VI program works very well and has no errors.

  However, when I try to compile the application, I get the error

  Error 1502 to the node invoke in AB_Source_VI.lvclass:Close_Reference.vi-> AB_Build.lvclass:Copy_Files.vi-> AB_Application.lvclass:Copy_Files.vi-> AB_Build.lvclass:Build.vi-> AB_EXE.lvclass:Build.vi-> AB_Engine_Build.vi-> AB_Build_Invoke.vi-> AB_Build_Invoke.vi.ProxyCaller

  Possible reasons:

  LabVIEW: Cannot save a bad VI without its schema.

  Method name: Save target: Instrument

  To my knowledge, there is no bad VI, like the VI to run ok in LabVIEW!

  Thanks for your help,

  David

  Construction of an exe does not actually include the dependencies, so you will be required to ensure that the dll is present on your target computer or build an installer that automatically places the dll on the computer.

• debugging a standalone application (EXE)

  Hello

  I have an application that uses ActiveX controls to communicate with two different cameras at the same time.

  I have a simulation environment in a computer where I got installed Labview 2014. Here, I built my program, and it works well.

  I created an application (EXE) and then tried in another computer that is isolated from all the networks, but it is the computer that manages the two devices directly.

  The program works very well, with the exception of a few minor errors. I want to debug the program on this computer, but I can't do it remotely, and it has no installed labview or.

  Do you know if there are any tools or ways to see my block diagram of the application or to see some of its settings while running?

  I find that this article

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/8DA679805915DE40862572D5007B2F70?OpenDocument

  but it does not apply to my case because I have access to no distance to the computer that is running.

  Thank you

  A method proven (and very old!) who will work with an executable is to build in logging functions.  I got a program in real time which seemed to lose of ticks.  He was already streaming status information for the PC, but something to 'lose '.  I added code to write to a local log file some 'Debug' information, including the State of some of my digital and found lines where my 'assumptions' on my code were false (i.e. my stupid mistake).

  Depending on your situation, which can involve a lot of text to read, but that's why we have with matching text editors...

  Bob Schor