Virt. itself esxi5.1 5.0 - required longmode 64-bit

Similar Questions

• vSphere requires a 32-bit DSN

  When you move to the installation of vSphere, if on a host Windows 64-bit x 86 compatibility mode, it takes a 32-bit DSN for database connection.

  If a DSN has been put in place through Start & gt; Administrative Tools & gt; Data sources (ODBC) vSphere Setup will not be able to use this DSN.

  Tool administrator ODBC 64 bits that can be invoked from the control panel to manage the user DSN and system DSN used by 64-bit process, but for the 32-bit data sources, the 32-bit ODBC Administrator tool is used for Windows on Windows 64 (WOW64) process.

  To configure a DSN 32 bit launch the 32-bit version of the Data Source Administrator. It is located in the: %systemdrive%\Windows\SysWoW64\Odbcad32.exe

  OK, now that we have covered, my only question is WHY?  vCenter 64-bit, 64-bit OS, 64-bit SQL, ESX database is now 64-bit... so, why the limit of 32-bit.

  We take two small steps forward to take one GIANT leap... And I must ask, what does VM Ware?  Why, oh why can't he be MORE thorough.  It's mind-boggling to hoops to make it work, it is really back.

  RParker wrote:

  Maybe because what it does not really matter. Make a 64-bit application actually use more memory (because all pointers and many other types of data, in its structures of duplicate data in size).

  It does not matter?  Hmm... you did not use the 64-bit applications for a long time have you?

  No, not for a long time.  Located only 10 years (IRIX 6.4 on the original SGI servers) and Digital UNIX on Alpha.  You have assumed, with no knowledge of who I am, or what I do for a living, somewhere, I'm an ignorant who doesn't know my donkey to my elbow.  Well, I have news for you.  I run one of the largest supercomputers in the world to live, one 64-bit from the beginning, because we need the applications to use more than 4 GB of RAM (we had a system with 256 GB of RAM in 2001).  In other words: I know what I'm talking about.

  Everyone can see that they are MORE robust and work better than 32-bit.  Seek to vSphere, it WAS 32-bit before, NOW the performance is much better, coincidence just HAPPEN when they converted to 64-bit?  I do not.

  They have had the time to fix bugs.  From 32 to 64-bit is completely irrelevant to this.  It is also possible to write good stable code in 32-bit and 64-bit.

  And why do companies that manufacture products HAVE 64-bit it a POINT they offer 64-bit support '?  Yes, it does not matter?  Only for people who do not pay attention to new technologies.

  It's called "marketing."  A lot of gullible bettors will think "64 is larger than 32, 64-bit must be better, right?" without really thinking about what it means.  The result: a lot of fat software, sales and big bonus of the commission.

  and vCenter isn't anywhere nearby which great - then there's really no need to make the 64-bit application. You would have nothing to win and probably lose some performance. OK, so 64-bit-to-end can be more 'clean' but that's all.

  Do you read the fluff or technical manuals?

  Technical manuals and experience 15 years as a sysadmin and programmer in high performance scientific computing.

  It's not at all... 64-bit isn't the following watchword is the FUTURE for existing technologies.

  Agreed.  Where did I say it was a buzz word?  Where I said that he should not be adopted?  Where did I say that the technology itself is not important?  I don't have.  All I said was that for this particular application, switching to 64 bit is not important.

  AND my point is that if they did the rest of the 64-bit products why they left these?

  For precisely the reason that I said, which you seem to have ignored.  This client is a small application.  He doesn't have to manage large amounts of data.  operating systems 64-bit x86_64 can execute 32-bit code in native mode, with no drop in performance.  Therefore, it is quite understandable that VMware is converting this application 64 bits a low priority.  On the other hand, converting server components 64-bit has been much more important, because they manage more large amounts of memory. ESXi itself, for example, must be able to manage physical servers with very large amounts of RAM, and this is something that cannot be done effectively with a 32 bit OS.  Then, of course, they did it first and left the customer server components to last because making 64-bit enable all new features or functionality.

  Forget all the ideal way to provide more software and better features, it must ALL be compiled on 64-bit then do not flip flop or use something else (such as a DSN of 32 bit on a 64-bit OS) ESPECIALLY when 64-bit DSN is backward compatible...

  Yes you can defend 32 bit all you want, to the people who KNOW the real difference, is there more to him than just double the number.

  No, it isn't.  The transition from 32-bit does nothing to increase stability.  If I write a request for a 32-bit system and then recompile it for 64 - bit, all bugs that had as a 32-bit will always be there in the 64-bit program.  It may be even more, due to invalid assumptions about the size of some data structures.  I would like that you describe to me exactly what you think it's more 'to him' (1) double the number of bits in certain types of integers and (2) double the number of bits in pointers, so that they can meet flat spaces of memory greater than 4 GB.  Enlighten those of us who went through the 32-> 64-bit transition 10 years ago and obviously missed something.  Please, I beg you.  The Linux community would like to know, too, since apart from those two things, there is no difference between a 32-bit version of Linux and a 64-bit version.  The same source is used for both versions.  Which is probably true for Windows 7, although of course I don't have access to the source code to check.  I certainly used to compile my Windows programs for two 16 - and 32-bit versions of Windows from the same source code, at the time it was necessary.

  In high performance computing stuff that I run, we actually moved some 64-bit to 32-bit applications, because the additional memory required for 64-bit slower (more RAM required results in a greater frequency of the CPU cache misses leads to reduced performance).  The difference can be very important, because the cache is about an order of magnitude faster in terms of latency than main memory, so if one asks who managed to run almost entirely into the cache, then that grows the cache, the performance drop can be huge.  Not all of this serves to something like the vSphere client, because it is not a CPU-bound application.

  This is not the same as the shift from 16-bit to 32-bit of the 1980s.  In this transition, stability has been improved, but it wasn't because of the increase in bits.  It was because of the additional memory protection features available in 32-bit modes of 386 processors and later, compared to that of the 8086 and 80286, and Linux, OS/2 and Windows NT all took advantage of this.

  Kind regards

  Tim

• Pentium 4 running software that requires a 64-bit, etc.. Is this possible?

  I have a Pentium 4:
  992.9 > MiB memory.
  > (2) 3.o GHz CPU;
  > 21.4 available disk space (with Linux installed, which I could not remove).
  I want to run the software requiring:
  > XP (64 - bit compatible) (told me that the computer would go very slowly if I used something other than XP)
  > Minimum 512 MB RAM (1 GB or more recommended)
  > 600 MB of available space required for the software and user manual.
  > 2 GB of additional disk space is required for all VST sounds / to THE included with the 2012 finals.

  My computer is able to do this with Windows XP 64-bit? I was planning on buying a copy of XP Professional on unused Amazon sold at retail. I am computer illiterate with the exception of the use of software - is similar to driving a car and not knowing really what as a clutch.
  Thank you very much!

  You don't want Windows XP 64-bit.  He has never supported with software and drivers, stick with 32-bit Windows.  But in all cases, your processor is not compatible with the 64-bit software.

• The .iso file I created with the Windows DVD 7 Professional 32 64 BIT is not installed using BootCamp because it says that it requires a 64 BIT .iso?

  Hello

  I try to have a system dual boot on a 2012 end iMac 27 inches with Intel i7 under OS X El Capitan v10.11.4 who had replaced running Fusion HD. I created files .iso files to both a .cdr WIndows 7 all-in-one 32/64 BIT DVD and a DVD from 32 to 64 BITS of Windows 7 Professionaland also downloaded the BootCamp5.1.5621 drivers. I created the files .iso on a USB disk ejector WD Passport 160 GB ATA. When I try to use BootCamp to create a WIndows 7 install disk from the selected .iso files, it is said that this version is not 64-BIT and it requires 64-BIT install on my iMac. What Bootcamp, look in the files of la.cdr/.iso it determines that it is not 64 bit?

  Please use your product key and download an ISO only 64 bits from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows7 and place it in your Documents folder. Find a 8 + GB USB Flash drive, which will be in the format / erased by BCA. Run BCA and use the option create USB Installer (it should automatically check the software download option). When you are prompted, point to the ISO. This installer from USB can be used repeatedly.

  El Capitan will create Setup with BC6 USB drivers. Please follow install Windows 7 and previous versions on your Mac with Boot Camp - Apple Support and follow steps 1 through 16 in the Windows 7 installation section. Pay attention to step 11 in particular.

• Program install problem that requires a 64-bit operating system.

  I can't install a program that requires that my computer is 64-bit.  I get an error message that says that it is not a 64 bit system.  When I look at my CPU information, he said that it is an AMD Athlon 64 X 2 Dual Core Processor 3800 +.  What gives here?  I'm edition XP SP3 Windows Media rumming.  There I'm missing something, but don't know what to look for.  Thanks for any help.  Frankycpu

  Monday, January 24, 2011, 19:30:18 + 0000, frankycpu wrote:

  I can't install a program that requires that my computer is 64-bit.

  No, you are not understanding what say you. It does not require
  your computer 64-bit, it requires your version of Windows to
  be 64-bit.

  I get an error message that says that it is not a 64 bit system.  When I look at my CPU information, he said that it is an AMD Athlon 64 X 2 Dual Core Processor 3800 +.  What gives here?  I'm edition XP SP3 Windows Media rumming.  There I'm missing something, but don't know what to look for.  Thanks for any help.  Frankycpu

  Your hardware is capable of running 64-bit Windows, but you
  running 32-bit Windows on it.

  Ken Blake (MS-MVP)

• Why new version muse is required only 62 bits?

  In fact I use 32-bit windows, but I could not new muse version. Because he want 64-bit! ;(

  The minimum system requirements for the new version with 2014, you will need to upgrade the system for the new version.

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• I am trying to install a software that requires a 32-bit operating system, but Vista has 64-bit

  What are my options?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-AU/Windows-Vista/32-bit-and-64-bit-Windows-frequently-asked-questions

  Read the above questions and answers about it.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-Vista/default.aspx

  Windows Vista Compatibility Center

  First thing to do is to check its Vista compatibility at the link above, and if not to see what patches/solutions are available from its manufacturer...

  See you soon. Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• bought LR 6 upgrade, requires the 64-bit system, I have 32 with x 64 based processor. Any solution?

  I bought LR 6 upgrade (have LR 5), did not know that he needs a 64 bit system.  Is there a solution to this?  Apart from a new computer?

  Unfortunately not.

  You need a 64-bit computer.

• SQL * PLUS 32-bit Client required for 64-bit Windows

  Hello
  
  I had a 64-bit Windows OS and Oracle 11.
  
  With 32-bit Applications (Crystal Reports) I can't run SQL NET thick, thin NET SQL and JDBC.
  32-bit Oracle Installation is missing.
  
  Oracles "Instant Client downloads for Microsoft Windows (32-bit)" won't do it.
  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/topics/WinSoft-085727.html
  
  What else to use?
  
  Thank you
  
  Martin Sautter

  You download the 32-bit client from:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/database/Enterprise-Edition/downloads/112010-win32soft-098987.html

  As already mentioned here, you need to install in a different House in db Oracle 64-bit. I did myself, as the toad is a 32 bit 32 bit tns application.

• Lightroom CC system requirement

  Hello, I'm the India Backer. I want to use Lightroom CC, but I'm confused if it will support the required configuration or not.

  I use a 32 - bit operating system, Windows 7. It really will support Lightroom CC if I install it on my system?

  Please give me suggestion and information so that I can use Lightroom CC as soon as possible.
  

  You can use creative cloud LR5 LR6/LRCC2015 will be unavailable but it requires a 64 bit OS.

• installation requirements for Adobe Technical Communication Suite 2015

  My question is about the installation for Adobe Technical Communication Suite 2015 requirements. The requirement of "16-bit video card": This means that the video card must be external (like those used for games). Or video integrated on the motherboard will be fine, make sure it meets the specifications.

  A video card on the motherboard should be fine.

  These specifications are very basic and computer hardware most sold in the last 5 years would easily meet these specifications.

• Current version of Muse actually requires 64-bit Windows?

  Hello.  Is the current version (latest version) of Muse actually * require * a 64-bit version of Windows?  Is there absolutely no way to run current Muse on my 32-bit of Windows 7 SP1 computer?

  I thought that Adobe Air was 32 bit...?

  Thank you

  Yes, it is only 64 bits. He is no longer running UC Air platform, it's a native app.

• ERROR: this version of esx requires a processor capable of 64-bit operation

  Kindly help to provide entries:

  I have a DELL Optiplex 760 that supports VT that is enabled.

  I tried to install directly ESX 4.0 and has been able to do successfully.

  However, I have tried to format and installed Windows 7 and then installed VM Workstation 7.

  When I tried to create a virtual machine (ESX), it gives me an error "this version of esx requires a 64-bit capable processor."

  Any advise?

  ESX 4 requires no VT she requires only a 64-bit processor.  Your physical processor is sufficient.  (Note, however, that you would be able to run the 32-bit clients.)

  Workstation 7 requires however VT virtualization features 64-bit processor.  Since you don't have VT, the virtual processor in Workstation 7 is a 32-bit processor.

• Minimum requirements for Windows Vista Home Premium - download & installation

  I need to install Adobe Acrobat X Pro for windows on my laptop and my operating system is Windows Vista Home Premium but I can not because the system tells me that I can't due to not meeting minimum requirements. What can I do to upgrade my system so that the program can be executed and be installed thanks?

  Acrobat X Pro system requirements

  Windows

  • 1.3 GHz or faster processor
  • Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, professional, or Tablet-PC Edition with Service Pack 3 (32 bit) or Service Pack 2 (64-bit); Windows Server 2003 (32-bit and 64-bit; (Service Pack 2 required for 64-bit); Windows Server 2008 or 2008 R2 (32-bit and 64-bit); Windows Vista® Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, or enterprise with Service Pack 2 (32-bit and 64-bit); Windows 7 Starter, Home Premium, professional, Ultimate or Enterprise (32-bit and 64-bit)
  • 512 MB RAM (1 GB recommended)
  • 1.9 GB of available disk space
  • screen resolution of 1024 x 576
  • DVD-ROM drive
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 or 8; Firefox 3.5 or 3.6
  • Video hardware acceleration (optional)

  Note: For 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 R2 and Windows XP (with Service Pack 2), Microsoft Update KB930627 is required.

• CC technology requirements

  All new products CC require a 64-bit computer?

  Nancy O.

  Please check the specifications of the creative cloud tech

  http://www.Adobe.com/in/products/creativecloud/tech-specs.html