VLAN with Switch L3 (SG-500)

Similar Questions

• Inter routing VLANs with this config

  Hi all

  I'm looking for clarification, I understand two Vlan need a device to layer 3 to enable routing between them.

  I wanted so check if this set up works or not.

  Router - Switch A-SwitchB-SwitchC

  All the link between router and switch are ports of junction and allows said we have VLAN 10 to 20 on switch C

  And two for the router interface to these VLANs.

  Device of two different VLANS on switch C can communicate?

  If this is not why. I guess, I'm rationalizing is traffic belonging to VLAN 10 crossbar router base and scope and is achieved through the trunk even join router

  Please specify.

  Thank you

  L

  Yes they should be able to communicate if done correctly. VLAN 10 and 20 must be resources shared by all switches to the router with the L3 interface.

  So for host on VLAN 10 to get a host on VLAN 20, the package would take VLAN 10 overall of all switches to the router, where it would get "routed" to VLAN 20 and again on the switches to the host to VLAN 20.

• Switches Cisco stackable, 500 and the consolidation of NETWORK cards

  Am looking using the stacking and NIC teaming to create redunancy for user access to servers. What I think is becoming 2 switches SG500-28 and set them up in a stack which appears as a logical switch. Now on the servers I have re 2 network cards to be a team so that they appear as a logical interface 1, perferably in an active/active configuration using LACP. In this team NIC take 1 member of the team to either switch B, so that each Member of the team is on separate switches.

  Givent the scenario:

  (1) who will work with the switches of the 500 series? The switches is that their price point is perfect for my client.

  (2) in addition, the connection of the battery will be there also needs to be a GAP between the switches or the connection of the battery is also data traffic?

  Hi Robert,.

  (1) I don't see any reason that this would not work as desired. There are the requirements by doing a SHIFT but being on the same physical switch isn't a.

  (2) with the switch of SG500 line, you have a few options for up/down the link between the switches to the battery, it depends on the model. Each of them supports 1 G up and down links with copper. The switches are then divided and support 5G or 10G mini-gbic down links. There is not currently an options trolling battery links.

  Let me know if that answers your questions!

• Problem with switching screens

  Hello, I have a problem with switching screens. Here is my code (both screens extends screen):

  SerializableAttribute public class Main extends UiApplication {}

  Private TrainLinkScreen trainLinkScreen;
  Private WorkingScreen workingScreen;
  private string;

  Public Shared Sub main (String [] args) {}
  new hand (.enterEventDispatcher ());
  }

  public Main() {}
  workingScreen = new WorkingScreen();
  pushScreen (workingScreen);

  try {}
  trainLinkScreen = new TrainLinkScreen();
  } catch (GpsException ex) {}
  message = ex.getMessage ();
  } catch (FileException ex) {}
  message = ex.getMessage ();
  }
  If (message! = null &! message.equals("")) {}
  invokeLater (new Runnable() {}

  public void run() {}
  Dialog.Alert (message);
  System.Exit (1);
  }
  });
  } else {}
  popScreen (workingScreen);
  pushScreen (trainLinkScreen);
  }
  }
  }

  The problem is that the workingScreen is not displayed. The download takes a little time, so I wanted to put here a screen like "I work, please wait...". ", but he appears, the unit freezes for a few seconds and then the trainLinkScreen appears. Could someone please write where is the problem? I tried invokeLater on the first screen, but it ends with the crash on popScreen (trainLinkScreen). I tried invokeLater on trycatch also block, but it does not work either. Help, please.

  Thank you. I already have the solution (I hope that ), I put to device gps location in a separate method (it's a small part of the code that does not have too much time to finish), she called before initialization and initialization in method invokeLater as a thread (the large part, too download from the internet). The display works perfectly in this way (in the first place, the "Download" screen appears and then comes the rest of the code) Although some other things seems to not work properly now

• Problem with switch Cisco SG300

  Hi guys,.

  I have a problem with switch Cisco SG300-20. After the failure of the switch boots in a kind of mode. It requires

  MAC address and serial number to be entered manually for the device. I tried to find information on this mode, but without success.

  My question is: what is this mode and how to make the start switch in this mode?

  How can I turn on the switch in this mode on purpose if it happens again and I enter the wrong information by accident.

  Thank you

  Hi Aegx, this is a rare case where the switch basically forget his identity. Although the switch is recoverable, it is recommended the switch RMA.

  If you are certain that you have neither taken under warranty, all the information that is asked is on the bottom of the switch sticker. If the thumbnail is is not present you wouldn't able to do this is correct.

  In addition, if you make a typographical error, the switch will have undesirable failures that are permanent, such as the inability to update software.

• New bug fixes with switching between tools

  Thank God! A problem with switching between tools in Adobe. When you transfer between open documents tool (framing or healing tool box & etc.) switch to default (first of all on the shortcut menu). Thank you guys for this problem, because it made me sick.

  Lots of Cuddles!

  Hi AndreyNosov,

  Thanks a ton for your comments.

  I'm sure, this is the must have set once you update the last update for Photoshop 2015.5.1

  Photoshop CC 2015.5.1 update now available

  Kind regards

  Mohit

• Power CLI script to add multiple VLANs with port group name in an ESX cluster

  Hi all

  Can someone help me get a script adds several VLANs with port group name in an ESX cluster?

  Kind regards

  Suresh

  OK, so you just need to do an Import-Csv inside the loop and change the variables accordingly.

  What is the provision of this CSV file?

• VLANS with Cisco ASA 5505 and non-Cisco switch

  I have an ASA5505 and a switch Netgear GSM7224 L2 that I try to use together.  I can't grasp how VLANs (or at least how they should be put in place).  When configuring my VLAN on the ASA5505 it seems simple enough, but then on my switch, I thought I'd create just the same VLAN numbers that I used on the SAA and then add the ports that I wanted to use for each VLAN.

  Currently on my ASA, I have the following VLAN configured...

  outside - vlan11 - Port 0/0

  inside - vlan1 - Port 0/1

  dmz_ftp - vlan21 - Port 0/2

  Port of Corp - vlan31 - 0/3

  I need to do the same thing on my switch as well...  On my way, I'm a little confused as to how I need to configure the VLAN.  Below is the screenshot of web GUI...

  

  Note: Normally you can now change the VLAN ID (red), but in this case the default vlan (vlan id 1) may not be changed or deleted, you can does not change its settings.

  Tagged (green), Untagged (purple) and Autodetect (yellow) you must select at least 1.  I'm not sure how to in one place to tell my inner vlan (vlan1).

  I want VLAN1 ports 1-8 on my Netgear switch used alone to talk to interface/0/1 on the ASA5505 port.  I don't want to NOT port 9-24 able to talk to ports 1-8 on the Netgear switch ports OR 0/0, 0/2 - 0 / 7 on the Cisco ASA 5505.

  So, how can I configure my inner Vlan1 on ports 1-8 on the switch?  Do mark, UNTAG, autodetect them?  What about tours?  I've been a bit the impression that I would set up my VLAN on both devices, then trunk port 1 and dedicate this port on both devices to nothing other than the sheath and the security of vlan would then take the packages where they need to go.  Is this the wrong logic?

  Hi Arvo,

  If the port of the ASA is just part of a single VLAN (i.e. e0/0 single door 11 VLAN), this is called an access port. If the port of the ASA had to carry several VLANs, it would constitute a Trunk port.

  To access ports (VLAN unique), you must set the switch corresponding to be unidentified for port this VLAN individual. If you decide to configure a trunk port, then the port of the switch must be set for labelling for each of VLAN who win the trunk.

  For example, ASA I have:

  interface Ethernet0/1
  switchport access vlan 20
  !
  interface Vlan20
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
  

  With the above configuration, the configuration of the switch would look like this (assuming the e0/1 port of the SAA is connected to 0/1 on the switch):

  VLAN 20 - 0/1 = untagged

  If instead you use a trunk port, the config would look like this:

  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface Vlan10
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  ip address dhcp setroute
  !
  interface Vlan20
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
  

  Assuming that the ASA e0/0 port is connected to 0/1 on the switch):

  VLAN 10 - 0/1 = tagged
  VLAN 20 - 0/1 = tagged
  

  Hope that helps.

  -Mike

• Compatibility of VLAN with Cisco

  Hello

  We just bought 10 x new Netgear switches (all M4100) to add to an existing Cisco infrastructure.

  Simple configuration with only 6 Valns.

  5: Admin, 30: VOIP, 101: management, 100: a set of Workstations, 102: second series of Workstations, 200: IPTV, 400: Internet, 401: Wireless Management

  All I wanted to do was: 2 last ports each switch netgear = T and all the VLANS. I have not identified all ports if I want to use in the appropriate vlan

  101 of VLAN is my Managementt Vlan. (Need to configure inter vlan routing for this to work)

  I only turned on three switches up to now and all three do not work. They work for a while and that packets but do not receive all.

  What I am doing wrong?

  What I need to get rid of the original vlan1 on the netgear?

  Is that what I need config in the STP to make these compatible with Cisco (300 and 400 series) switches.

  I use an optical backbone on Cisco and Netgear switches.

  Sincere greetings,

  OLAF

  Hi Moussa,.

  Thanks for reaching out.

  We got it working.

  Step 1: upgrade to the latest firmware.

  Step 2: Forget the MISTLETOE.

  We had a few questions about the old firmware - causing links to trunk have some incompatibility with their tag and removed the images between Cisco and Netgear brand.

  After the upgrade of the firmware that we had access to "switchport mode access" and "switchport mode trunk" orders fixing the access port and trunking issues.

  Thank you Mr President,

  OLAF

• Management of VLANS on switches PowerConnect 28XX

  I had already tried the PowerConnect 27XX switches (mainly the 2708), and while it worked very well, he had a very, very frustrating feature: the IP address of management was always assigned to VLAN 1 - there is no way to change this.  I wonder if someone who has the (2708 or 2716) 28XX series could tell me if they have added a way to change the management VLAN, or if the management VLAN is always pasted to the VLAN1?  It is a decisive feature - I can't lose a port on VLAN1 on the switch just to be able to manage, as our current environment uses a VLAN for management.

  Thank you

  Nick

  management of VLANs is always vlan 1 on 28xx switches.

  An option is outwardly loop back one vlan 1 coelio to an access port vlan XX.   This will allow you to manage the switch on any vlan.  Of course, it burns 2 ports, not just 1.  But these switches are inexpensive, so you can have a hard time to find a solution less expensive just to avoid to manage on the vlan 1 or using the hack of the outer loop.

  Note: 28xx executes a single PLEASE, so you will need to disable the STP Protocol on the loop back ports if you go with this hack.

• This should be easy but... VLANS and switches

  I have 2 switches Dell 6224 is in Vlan35 and the other is vlan110 - I have an Ethernet cable connecting a switch to another - the port on the vlan 110 arrives but the port on the vlan 35 does not work - I want to access the vlan switch 110 of vlan 35 - what should I add to my config so that it works?

  Thank you very much

  Eric

  When you need two different VLANS to communicate with each other if you have enabled an L3 device on the network to perform routing. Your 6224 ToR may already setup for VIRTUAL LAN routing. In the config, it will have the command # ip Routing. Then the switch should just an IP address for each VIRTUAL local area network, and can then route between the VLANS.

  Example of possible configuration:

  6224 ToR

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.1
  VLAN 35 = 192.168.35.1
  VLAN 110 = 192.168.110.1
  # ip Routing
  # int port-channel 1
  switchport mode trunk #.
  # permit switchport trunk vlan add 35 110

  6220

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.2
  VLAN 35 only = no IP address
  VLAN 110 no = no IP address

  port-channel int # 1 (connection to ToR 6224)
  switchport mode trunk #.
  # permit switchport trunk vlan add 35 110

  port-channel int # 2 (connection iSCSI 6224)
  switchport mode access #.
  # switchport access vlan 110

  iSCSI 6224

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.3
  VLAN 35 only = no IP address
  VLAN 110 no = no IP address

  port-channel int # 1 (connection to 6220)
  switchport mode access #.
  # switchport access vlan 110

  You can also try to continue in the way of the use of the static routes for everything, I don't know how this will work.

• Config port / VLAN on switch MXL

  I'm not a network engineer, but I try to set a port to my MXL switch to a VLAN that will route traffic on virtual machines on a local network of calculation.

  This is the port Te 0/52 on the back of the MXL and I am running ESXi on servers in my m1000e.  In fact, I have two MXLs in the tissue A of the m1000e configured with VLT via the interfaces of the FourtyGig.  This part has been implemented by people of Dell Tech Services, making the installation.

  Here's what looked like the config to start:

  dsa1 #show vlan

  Codes: *-Default VLAN - VLAN, GVRP, R - G remote control Port Mirroring VLAN, P - primary, C - community, I - isolated
  O Openflow
  Q: U - no identified, the T - tag
  x - unidentified Dot1x, X - Dot1x tag
  o - unidentified OpenFlow, O - OpenFlow tag
  G - GVRP tag, M - Vlan-stack, H - VSN tagged
  i unidentified intern, I - labeled internal, untagged, V v - VLT - VLT tag

  Ports Status Description Q NUM
  * 1 U active Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  U Po41 (Te 0/41-44)
  Te U 0/1-32
  115 active Mgmt T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  486 active VMGuest T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  Te U 0/49-50

  And I wanted to add VLAN 1000 to calculate, so I did the following:

  dsa1 #conf

  dsa1 (conf) #interface Te 0/52
  dsa1 (conf-if-you-0/52) #show config
  !
  interface TenGigabitEthernet 0/52
  no ip address
  MTU 12000
  hybrid portmode
  switchport
  FlowControl rx tx off
  spanning tree rstp edge port bpduguard stop-on-violation
  no downtime

  dsa1 vlan (conf) #interface 1000
  dsa1 (conf-if-vl-1000) #show config
  !
  interface Vlan 1000
  Description information
  name computer
  no ip address
  Tagged TenGigabitEthernet 0/1-32
  Unmarked TenGigabitEthernet 0/52
  no downtime

  VLAN now looks like:

  dsa1 #show vlan

  Codes: *-Default VLAN - VLAN, GVRP, R - G remote control Port Mirroring VLAN, P - primary, C - community, I - isolated
  O Openflow
  Q: U - no identified, the T - tag
  x - unidentified Dot1x, X - Dot1x tag
  o - unidentified OpenFlow, O - OpenFlow tag
  G - GVRP tag, M - Vlan-stack, H - VSN tagged
  i unidentified intern, I - labeled internal, untagged, V v - VLT - VLT tag

  Ports Status Description Q NUM
  * 1 U active Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  U Po41 (Te 0/41-44)
  Te U 0/1-32
  115 active Mgmt T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  486 active VMGuest T Po41(Te 0/41-44)
  V Po33 (0/33.37 Fo)
  Te T 0/1-32
  Te U 0/49-50
  1000 active Compute T Te 0/1-32
  Te U 0/52

  But I wanted to add THAT VLT Po33 tag to the new VLAN because there is in others, not because I really understand what it does.  In my view, it is used for load balancing?  If I label it with the command 'tag Po33' in the config of vlan, out with the status "T" instead of "V".

  Here are the details of the VLT:

  dsa1 #show vlt detail
  Local LAG Id counterpart LAG Id status Local Peer status Active VLAN
  ------------  -----------  ------------  -----------  -------------
  41 41 UP UP 1, 115, 486
  dsa1 #show brief vlt
  VLT area in brief
  ------------------
  Domain ID: 100
  Role: secondary
  Primary role: 4096
  ICL Link Status: to the top
  Status of heart rate: upward
  VLT Peer status: to the top
  The local unit ID: 0
  Version: 6 (4)
  Local system MAC address: f8:b1:56:09:70:b1
  MAC address of the remote system: f8:b1:56:09:70:fd
  Configured the system MAC address: 00:01:00:01:00:01
  Version of the remote system: 6 (4)
  Restore delay timer: 90 seconds
  Delay-restore Abort threshold: 60 seconds
  Routing peer: disabled
  By the peer-routing-Timeout timer: 0 seconds
  Multicast peer-routing timeout: 150 seconds

  So my questions are, I'm on the right track?  It will do what I want it to do is send traffic on port 0/52 Te which is labeled in ESXi with 1000 VLAN?  Should I worry the VLT marking stuff and if yes, how should I do the VLT marking rather than normal marking?

  The connection only 1 port of MXL 1 to a device, this device is considered a switch/host an orphan. A VLT connection will have 1 port each MXL placed in a port channel and connected to a device.

  Here is a good article that covers the VLT in use with different Topologies.

  http://Dell.to/1wfDl3n

  And the User Guide is a good source to have as well.

  http://Dell.to/1Hy70bb

• Several VLANs with multiple gateways

  Hello.

  Got a SF500 in Layer 3 mode, 5 VLANS air conditioned and have their own subnet.

  VLAN 10 = 192.168.10.0/24

  VLAN 100 = 192.168.100.0/24

  VLAN 200 = 192.168.200.0/24

  VLAN 201 = 192.168.201.0/24

  VLAN 202 = 192.168.202.0/24

  We have a gateway on Vlan 10 (192.168.10.1), which all VLANS can see & access (because of intervlan routing), and this currently allows for vlan 10 for access to the internet.

  I want to vlan 100 to be able to access the internet through this gateway, although other VLAN (200,201,202), uses a different gateway located on the vlan 200 subnet.

  Of course, the gateway must be in the subnet.  I can't assign the default gateway of a machine on vlan 100, the gateway ip address on vlan 10.

  If I point the virtual interface default gateway in its subnet (for example, 192.168.100.254), he also does not know how to get to the internet, even if she can see the entry door (I can access a web page it hosts).

  So the question is this:

  Traffic 100 VLANs can be routed on the SF500 to use the gateway on the vlan 10? (outside the default gateway of the switch).

  If this is not possible with the SF500, what do I need to make it work?

  Thank you very much.

  Hi André,.

  I understand what you want to achieve, so in your case, we need a switch with PBR (policy based routing) capacity that allow to match the IP source address and action hope then the IP address of the gateway.

  This feature is not implemented in SMB product, but for devices of the company, we have this feature as Catalyst 3750

  Please note or marked as replied to help other customers of Cisco

  Greetings

  Mehdi

• Query VLANS with Cisco configuration example

  List of expensive,

  I was wondering if there is an error on the Cisco documentation below.

  The schema and configuration shows the LWAPs attached to the switch on vlan 5, but the trunk to the WLC is pruning vlan 5.

  If this is true, how the LWAPP LWAPs with the WLC to talk?

  The proposed config is a few lines of the diagram below.

  Thanks for any comments.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6366/products_configuration_example09186a0080665cdf.shtml#DIA

  Chris.

  Management of the AP is on vlan 5, so there's no reason to be vlan 5 allowed on the trunk for the wlc.  Only the interfaces configured on the WLC should be allowed.

  Management, AP-Manager and all dynamic interfaces... service-port can be included, but should not be routable.

  Hope that explains it... If not let me know :)

• Restricted Inter-VLAN with SG200-26 and SG300-10 routing

  Hi all

  My apologies if this has been covered elsewhere.

  My organization would like to organize a LAN game activity. The installation program I have in mind involves a switch 24 ports to connect all computers in player and saw that the switch connected to a smaller 'core' which has the connected the router and game server. I would like to know if I can put things up as follows...

  SG200-26 with 1 to 24 ports on VLANS separated so they can talk to eachother. I'd then ports 25 and 26 to be a trunk aggregated (for bandwidth and redundancy) port to carry all 24 VLAN more an additional management VLAN (VLAN 100 e.g.) that will be used to access the switch. I want these aggregated trunk ports to connect to a 'core' SG300-10 switch that is connected to the game server and a router for internet access.

  I would like to than the possibility of having two network connections of the server to the switch, one on the management of VLANS and the other on a VLAN different (e.g. 50 VLAN) which will be accessible by players (ports 1-24 of SG200-26). The power switch needs to be able to perform routing inter - VLAN restricted, because it does not VLAN 1-24 of eachother talk but they can talk to VLAN server, but only through specific service ports (e.g. 12345, 12346 port). Is this possible?

  Also how I configure the SG300-10 to enable the VLAN 1-24 of VLAN 50, but not to talk or VLAN 100. So, I will probably have the router on its own LAN VIRTUAL (VLAN 60 ex.) and allow for VLAN 1-24 for access, but only via HTTP port 80 for web access.

  What do you think?

  Thank you.

  Hi Marc, the default gateway of the computers will be the SVI to the switch.

  Router-> couche3-> SG300 layer 2 SG300

  router is 192.168.1.1

  VLAN 1 in 300 SG is 192.168.1.100

  2 VLAN on 300 SG is 192.168.2.1

  SG300 layer 2 has a 1u, 2 t trunk.

  My computer to connect to an access port 2 unidentified on the layer 2 SG300.

  I am able to ping 192.168.2.1

  I am able to ping 192.168.1.100

  I can not 192.168.1.1 pnig

  The reason is that the router has no idea on this subnet so cannot send the package to the source 192.168.2.x subnet.

  The ACL and the basic connection are 2 different animals. The ACL is to prevent intervlan communication. The basic connection must be tags trunk and vlan or static routes.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful