VLAN question Unauthentication scaling

Similar Questions

• VLANning questions about blades MXL

  Hello

  I have a new M100e with a SAN PS4110xs case, a few servers blade and two switches Force10 MXL (switches and SAN on fabric)

  I put it all in place and works fine, but using the default VLAN for all

  I want to connect the switches to a Juniper EX3300 via SFP ports + and send the subnet SAN out so that I can connect remotely to the IP address of the EqualLogic for VMM integration management

  However, every time I try to put SAN ports in a VLAN separate-, before even that I look into the chutes for the Juniper - I lose all connectivity on the San.

  I created a new VLAN (VLAN120), but as soon as I set the ports inside they cannot ping each other.

  int vlan120

  Tagged te0/1 (this is the port of SAN)

  Tagged te0/12 (it is a single server)

  Tagged te0/16 (that's the other server)

  as soon as I do that I lose all connectivity to the San and server cannot ping each other via the iSCSI network.

  I tried to use 'no label' instead of 'tag' with the same effect.

  The VLAN is active (non-stop)

  I am at a loss for what is the question.

  Any help gratefully received.

  Select this option.

  I understood the question - I got 2 trunk in the Juniper VLAN120 links - as soon as I disabled the second interface everything arises in life

  Now I need to try to find a way to implement a SHIFT between the two MXL in the stack and a Juniper ex3300 - I managed to get the connectivity that I need, but with only a single link - as it is a remote site I want redundancy :-)

• Wiring of VMotion and VLan question...

  Hello

  I understand the VLANS and how they work, but I'm not really a 'network' guy and I have a few questions...

  My servers are dl380 g6 with 8 network ports. I intend using two for console service, two for vmotion and the other 4 for my virtual switch of production. I know there is no way of vswitches configuration, but it's my game to date plan.

  My question is how can I configure a vlan and segment the traffic for vmotion? I have 4 ports on my physical switch that I put aside for this vlan vmotion. How can I set this up? Wwhat can I do on the switch and how do I have to create a separate subnet in the DNS? ABLES

  My plan is to pass the cables from the ports on esx hosts I put aside for vmotion to the physical switch ports...

  I'm not too sure about that...

  Thank you! points will be awarded to anyone.

  Hello.

  My question is how can I configure a vlan and segment the traffic for vmotion? I have 4 ports on my physical switch that I put aside for this vlan vmotion. How can I set this up? Wwhat can I do on the switch and how do I have to create a separate subnet in the DNS? ABLES

  What kind of physical switch are you using?  Here is a link to the Cisco documentation to create the VLAN on Catalyst switches.  Create a layer 2 VLAN and create VMkernel interfaces with the appropriate IP addresses.  Don't worry about DNS or Routing and keep things simple, if you can.

  Good luck!

• Question about scaling for orientation landscape

  I noticed when you use the Simulator BB10, my app is scaling according to the reported resolution of 768 x 1280 instead of 1280 x 768. For this purpose the application is updated to be the incorrect scale. If the application is configured to start in landscape mode, the device should not report as such resolution (1280 x 768)?

  Is it possible to understand dynamically? or just assume if horizontal is reported to be smaller than the verticle, just trade accordingly?

  Hope you get what I mean, I probably not explains it very well

  Just because you specify landscape, the device will probably be in the corresponding mode. Default mode BB10's portrait and on Tablet, landscape.

  It is best to look just at the stage width and height to determine the current orientation and restore as needed. You can listen for orientation changes as well.

  If you run only in the landscape, then you will need to flip how your draw based on if app is landscape-aligned or not aligned it to landscape.

  You may be able to simply rotate your landscape drawable on a change of direction.

• Question of scaling of head

  I was wondering if there is a way to prevent the head scaled down, but at the same time still allow to scale Mount?

  I like the way it looks when my thin puppets in the camera, but when I look too far back they seem strange.

  Is it possible to prevent him from less than 0 scale or below the default value while allowing the lean - in?  I know that you could define rest pose and be really careful to lean backward, but I intend to have the actors to portray my puppets and I don't want to hurt their performance.

  Perhaps a future version could include parameters rather than a sliding scale?  Thank you!

  Currently no, it's all or nothing. I guess that you can sit in front of a wall, if you want to restrict movement to the rear.

  The limits are an interesting idea, though - I could see this being useful for something like the eyebrows too (maybe I just they're going upwards, not downwards). Thanks for the suggestion!

• Design - Rack Edge or Edge VLAN question

  I have Cisco UCS and Nexus 7 k gear I design, so I use this design guide:

  https://www.VMware.com/files/PDF/products/NSX/VMware-NSX-on-Cisco-n7kucs-design-guide.PDF

  However, it is not totally clear on how the physical to virtual connections must be deployed.  Looking at this guide (page 11), it seems that 5 VLAN must be shared resources to each host (including the VLAN edge), and it would negate the need for a separate group of edge (or grid).  However, the same guide also speaks of a cluster of mgmt and edge and there is even a diagram (pg 13) that shows what looks like to me a host of edge.  Since both the mgmt, edge and compute clusters all share the same distributed switch, it seems that this design is indicating that there is no need for a separate edge cluster.   Does this sound right to you?

  Then the document proposed the edge VLAN to shared resources for all hosts, the VLAN Edge can simply be ignored and remain stagnant on the hosts of the calculation, thus linking the only living on the edge/edge management cluster VLAN edge elements.  He accomplishes the goal of the cluster Edge.  The edge vs no decision dashboard isn't so much on this VLAN are connected, but more info on how you plan to implement NSX and its components.

  Brad Hedlund did a good job, talking through the design, specific to the N7K decisions, who do not do in the Cisco Design here document and help you decide if needed/wanted a cluster of edge: http://bradhedlund.com/2015/02/06/going-over-the-edge-with-your-vmware-nsx-and-cisco-nexus/

• Beginner question: resizing/scaling of images, STROKE and workflow.

  Hi all.  I am new to the world of the Illustrator/design, so my apologies for what may seem like a stupid question and I thank you in advance for the advice.

  Basically, I created an image in illustrator that I want to use at different sizes.  I thought at the start: "Hey, it's all the stuff of vector, so I should just be able measure it goes up and down without problem!  However, I quickly realized that while paths are vectors, the stroke applied to paths are not, and they do not change proportionally when I adapt paths.  So, if I increase the size of the image, the objects that were once touching now have gaps between them, and if I reduce the size of the image, certain traits begin to overlap. Just to be perfectly clear on what I'm talking about, here are a few screenshots:

  Original	Image scale	Small scale image

  My questions are:

  1. Was my assumption that 'Illustrator files can be resized easily and inconsequential"simplistic and erroneous?  (It seems that it is!) Please help me understand how illustrator is or is not useful to create scalable images.
  2. Is the right way to manage this just to determine the need for size and have separate AI for each size files, or is there a way to 'better' which implies not manually kicks setting for images of different sizes?
  3. Third option of comedy!
     

  nvenet,

  The perception of the way it should be is correct; but there are a few strangenesses that can mess things up.

  An important one if you have strokes & effects of scale checked or unchecked, in this case, it must be checked, and I believe that it is unchecked.

  You can find it in the Transform palette dialog box.

  You can consider the object > path > feature of contour, then Ctrl / Cmd + SHIFT + G to ungroup, then Pathfinder > unite to change the path traced in a simple filling/nostroke. This will work regardless of features & scale effects.

  Another important is the ghost of pixel grid Align attribute which may haunt you, know well in other cases; often you can recognize by distortions. If it isn't:

  You can select the entire document and untick finally align on the pixel grid in the Transform palette and uncheck also align new objects to the pixel grid in the options of the Launcher.

  And you can avoid the types of documents with the default (RGB for the web and other) or change the default value for such documents.

• Design of Network\VLAN question

  I have a network completely flat and Im not a networking guy, but I have two ESX host, I need to build with a Lefthand SAN

  and I want to create a VLAN for vmotion traffic segmentation. Anyone know where I could find instructions to create the VLAN?

  I have 6 NETWORK adapters per ESX host and plan on using iSCSI software. I have also dedicated physical switches for my iSCSI traffic.

  How you prefer to use the 6-port network card?

  Awared points to answers.

  Hello

  You can assign a VLAN on each port group. VSphere Client, click on ESX / I have server you want to configure > click on the Configuration tab > then click on link networking in the hardware Section. Then click on the properties link in one of the vSwitch > select one port group, and then click on edit. Finally, you can assign a VLAN in the VLAN ID properties.

  The best way to use the NIC ports available, I think that there depends on your preferred configuration. For example, what kind of features you need to activate, the requirement for a network for each virtual computer speed, etc. But, basically, I have the same perception with the previous suggestion. You can allocate one or two ports for specific traffic.

• Question of scaling of the FPGA 2009 PID.vi LV

  Hey all,.

  I have been using the PID.vi in the FPGA LV 8.5 module.  I've updated for 2009, and the vi of PID is different now.  Instead of taking values for the Kc I16, Ki, Kd, value, it now uses FXP 16 bit, with an 8-bit integer value.

  I'm messing around with my host now, trying to figure out how to change the values correctly.  I was using the "niFPGA ScalePIDGains.vi" in the example of "discreet use PID - R series.  This example is the same in 2009 LV compared to 8.5, in what is still growing values at I16.  How would you correctly scale values in the FXP 16-bit value that awaits the FPGA vi?

  Thank you

  Bones349,

  Here is some information on the fixed-point data type. You can try to use To fixed-point Function to convert the data type of fixed point of various other types of data, or you can try the wiring directly in the PID VI I16, as it appears to do the conversion for you.

• How can I make my swf is displayed correctly in the browser windows?

  I want to publish my Flash file and make it accessible by a link, but it does not display correctly. All angles or curved edges look jagged and uneven. Straight lines are fine, but everything else seems messy. In addition, my last swf is amplified to fill the window of the browser for a reason, which looks terrible. I didn't know the question before scaling and I can't understand what the problem is this time. Files I posted before still displayed to the normal size of the file work, but it works differently. I use Flash CS6, and I tried to download and view my swf in Chrome and firefox. The swf dimensions are 1280 by 720. Thank you

  If you link directly to the swf instead of an html page that loads the SWF then the swf will size itself to fit the browser window.

• two questions of routing VLAN fast

  Let's say that I have spend a routing 4 L3 VLAN

  VLAN 1 192.168.10.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.10.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 2 is 192.168.20.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.20.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 3 is 192.168.30.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.30.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 4 192.168.40.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.40.254 inside this vlan

  There is that a single router out of this switch at the net, and lets say that it is in VLAN 1 and its address is 192.168.10.1

  first question - inside the L3 switch I need to add a default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1

  to ensure that all traffic not matching only a 192.168.x.x address not know where to go to the net, correct?

  Second - when this router, is there a difference if I use the following static route:

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254

  Instead of

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254

  ?

  Whatever happens, the package comes to switch L3, but in one case, what happened to it through the interface VLAN 1 VLAN and in the other case, he gets there through the interface VLAN VLAN for which traffic is intended anyway. is what im trying to figure out, this will make a difference at all? especially with regard to broadcast packets?

  If it makes no difference, then it is safe to say that the following static route would be optimal?

  192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.254

  Re "of all". Fix. The L3 switch will route traffic based on its routing table. By default, he knows all IP subnets, it is directly connected to, i.e. all subnets VLAN. If you must add a route by default manually or not depends on the exact implementation. It would be nice if the L3 switch will use the no default for routing gateway that you use for the switch IP parameters itself (if there is an option in the web interface to set a default gateway). If you cannot define a default gateway on the L3 switch, you might have to manually add a static route. The easiest way would be to check the current routing table and see if there is a default or not gateway.

  Re "then." A router can only transfer the packets to the next hop router. The next hop router must be connected to this router. The route "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254" is correct for a router with IP address 192.168.10.1 and 255.255.255.0 as 192.168.10.254 subnet mask is connected to the router. "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254" is not correct. The router cannot learn the path to a subnet specific 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 using a gateway on that subnet. It is not correct to use this kind of a route and do not use it even if it might work even (because the router is a simple query ARP to find the MAC address of the 192.168.20.254 and your L3 switch will respond to the ARP request, even if it's on the internet of 192.168.10.254). At the same time that another router between 10 and 20 subnets it would work no more...

  Re your conclusion: I recommend to keep four static routes to subnets existing on the L3 switch instead of put in a single subnet more great which includes a lot of addresses that are not connected here. Technically, this works if you only use working IP addresses. But you will see some loops if you send something to 192.168.55.50 or similar. The gateway router it will send to the L3 switch that will return to the catwalk. They should understand it's a loop, but still, I would not recommend this type of installation... Add routes for each of the L3 switch subnet...

• Question of vlan Cisco 7600 PFD

  Hello!

  Please help with a question.

  In our network, we have 7600 and I need to create a service of vpls with two different VLAN associated with a PFD:

  L2 PFD manual test
  VPN id 100
  neighbor 1.1.1.1 mpls encapsulation

  interface Vlan120
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  PFD xconnect tests
  !
  interface Vlan121
  no ip address

  And when I try to reach "xconnect PFD testing:

  Incompatible with the PFD configured setting.
  Check the interface MTU, VLAN ID size
  Or try to configure BPDU PW on routed SVI, which is not allowed

  Is it possible to do or not? No mapping VLANs etc.

  Thank you all!

  Hi Dimitri, you can do it, but the link is made to port vlan does not level level IVR.

  Here is a configuration snippet:

  the GigabitEthernet4/1/0 interface

  101 ethernet service instance

  encapsulation dot1q 101 second 10

  rewrite the penetration pop tag 2 symmetrical

  interface GigabitEthernet4/1/1

  ethernet 100 service instance

  encapsulation dot1q 100

  rewrite tag pop 1 symmetrical penetration

  connect GigabitEthernet4/1/0 eline-101 101 100 GigabitEthernet4/1/1

  Xander

• Questions of VLAN and configuration for Cisco AIR-CT2504-25-K9 Controller

  Hello

  It's my first time thanks to the Cisco wireless solutions, so I was hopping someone could help me with the following:

  We just bought the AIR-CT2504-25-K9 controller with some points of access for the AIR-CAP1702I-E-K9.

  The network is as follows:

  Peripheral layer 3 (managed by third parties): it's on the domain network. (VLAN by default, 1 - unidentified)

  ADSL router - it's the network without comment thread. (Default Vlan 4 - tagged).

  VOIP: VLAN 5.

  Both fittings go into a switch Cisco SG500 52 (Layer 2). There is a port to shared resources on the switch SG500 with VLAN 1 (Tagged) and VLAN 4 (with tag). The WLAN controller is plugged into this port trunking.

  The data and management network are in the same subnet and on the same VLAN (1).

  I used the wizard on the controller setup.

  There are three interfaces:

  management VLAN ID 1 IP 192.168.1.2 Port 1 (configured with a gateway domain network, DHCP, etc.).

  VLAN wireless identifier 4 IP 192.168.5.1 Port 1 comments (configured with modem router ADSL, DHCP, etc.).

  Virtual IP 192.0.2.1

  Proxy DHCP active overall.

  There are two wlan networks:

  (1) area - management Interface - SSID abc.

  (2) comments - comments Wireless Interface - SSID xyz (the wizard put to management, but I changed it to the wireless).

  Are the AP connected to another SG500 switch which is shared resources to the switch with the controller.

  Ports of the APs are connected to have only 1 VLAN unidentified. They don't have 4 VLAN Tag or not identified. However, everything seems to work as expected.

  When I join the guest network (SSID xyz), I get an IP address from the router ADSL and all Internet traffic goes through him. When I connect to the domain network (SSID abc), I get an IP address from the DHCP in Windows Server and all traffic goes through the device of layer 3 (I checked the public IP address in my browser). I can't ping anything from one network to the other.

  My questions are the following:

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Thank you

  A

  Hello

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  Yes, I'm with CAPWAP:

  More information: http://lets-start-to-learn.blogspot.de/2014/08/cisco-wireless-understand...

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  If you want that mgmt interface must be unmarked and then put 0 otherwise you can use vlan 1.

  I do not have what is configured under mgmt and comments interface, but according to the name I'll say yes, you must set the comments under comments wlan interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Yes, there are many things that you can configure, but I'll leave most of the default of things unless you really need to change!

  The following best practices: http://www.borderlessccie.net/?p=270

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• SG200 - 26 configuration newbie question VLAN

  Hi all

  After using a Netgear switch for years, this is my first Cisco switch now and it drives me crazy because it is much more "professional" than the Netgear one...

  My question is:

  My router, I am connected to the switch with two separate interfaces that should work like two "zones". GE25 for LAN, GE26 for the WLAN.

  Now, I have connected my

  • LAN devices to ports to GE24 GE4
  • WLAN devices to ports GE1 to GE3

  How should I configure VLAN so that the port groups mentioned above do not see between them them?

  You can assume that I would use a VLAN ID

  • 10 for the LAN
  • 100 for the WLAN

  Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

  Best regards

  Frank

  Dear Frank,

  Thank you to reach small business support community.

  Note the SG200 is a Layer2 device and therefore does not provide communication inter - VLAN by its own.  Please refer to the below section "Configuration of VLAN on SG200 switches" successful

  http://sbkb.Cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&PID=2&app=search&VW=1&articleid=80

  I hope you find this information useful and do not hesitate to contact me if there is any other help I can help you with that.

  Kind regards

  Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
  Support Engineer Cisco client

  * Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

• SF300 Questions of the of the VLAN IP address

  I bought 3 SF300-48 switches to work AP1131AG Aironet wireless with my APs. I have now spent 1 VLAN for all to have a Guest_Wireless VLAN 200 as well as the default VLAN 1 for my Corporate_Network. The question that I have is that any client on my default VLAN receives an IP address from the DHCP Windows Server without problems, but when you connect to the guest VLAN you can't obtain an IP address.

  So, I also have a Cisco 3560 G Router (default gateway) which has the same Aironet AP1131AG AP connected to it with the same config as additional points of access files and it works perfectly. I can connect to each SSID wireless (Corp. Vlan1 or comments Vlan 200) and get the IP address of the DHCP server.

  I also have the network below plan and was seeking help in the SF300 configuration to allow the IP to get on the subnet, Vlan 200. I also tried to connect my laptop directly in the SF300 and configure the port to access the Vlan 200 and I still can't an IP address.

  Any help would be appreciated...

  Aaron

  Hi aaron, on the 3560, the port mode is defined as the encapsulation dot1q and one vlan specified native? Also, for the SF300 vlan natif native is 1, you tag vlan 200 to the trunk?

  The Catalyst switch works differently than the SX300 switch in this sense.

  Note also, will not attend the VTP SX300 or PAO.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages