SF300 Questions of the of the VLAN IP address

Similar Questions

• cannot ping the new ip address

  Hello, everyone

  I'm working with switch SG300-10. I am trying to assign an ip address for a new VLAN ID. But I can not ping after finishing.

  First, I added a new ID (100) of VLAN

  

  Then I assigned a port to this vlan

  

  Finally, I added an ip address for this id vlan

  

  After that, I tried to ping 192.168.10.24, but it did not work.

  Is there something wrong, that I did?

  Hi Jiahing, you give too many omissions. All about the VLAN, IP addresses, gateways, physical connection and firewalls of material.

  It is the configuration of all for basic connectivity.

  Host A connects to port 1 in VLAN 1.

  Host A IP address is 192.168.1.10, mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.1.254

  Host B connects to port 2 VLAN 200

  Address IP of B the host will be 192.168.2.10 with mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.2.254

  The configuration of the switch would be as follows

  config t

  database of VLAN

  VLAN 200

  int vlan 1

  192.168.1.254/24 IP address

  int vlan 200

  192.168.2.254/24 IP address

  int gi0/2

  switchport trunk vlan 200 native

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Question about the implementation of VLAN automatic voice with Polycom phones on a SF 300 - 24 p

  Someone at - it Setup successfully a SF 300 - 24 p to automatically assign a VLAN voice for traffic from an IP of Polycom phone? We have activated with LLDP-MED policy assigned to the port, as well as the interface configured as a trunk with the PVID defined on the VLAN data and Auto VLAN enabled.

  Hello

  Thank you for using the Cisco support community. My name is Nico Muselle and I work for Cisco Small Business Support Center.

  In response to your question, the only additional thing required on your switch is the choice of one of the below configurations:

  1. Affect the phone VLAN statically to ports connection of phones.

     or

  2. Turn them on Vlan voice (and change CoS affecting 5), and add telephony YES Polycom phones (the first 3 bytes of the MAC). You may need to add a few different Yes. This way the switch detects the phone YES and add the switchport to the Vlan voice.

  LLDP-MED network strategy as you have defined it, on the other hand, will be used to assign the VLAN on the phone automatically if you do not have to configure it manually on all phones.

  In short, you can choose one of the methods above, in combination with the LLDP-MED policy so everythings should work just fine. If it is not, please let me know.

  Kind regards

  Nico glacier
  Cisco Small Business Support Center.

• SWITCH Cisco/Linksys SLM224G: Problem with the VLAN

  Hello!

  I'm trying to set up a VLAN in my baskets. I have some knowledge about VLANs, but I still can not configure in my path.

  My situation:

  I have PC that contains two virtual machines, which works as a router between three networks: LAN, WAN, LAN2. It's a bit complicated, but I'll try to draw:

                                                   |-------------||----------------------------|                   |           e1|-to-eth1-VM2-----WAN|VirtualMachine 1        eth0|---trunk-VLAN1&2---|g1         e2|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2|eth0=VLAN1 eth1=VLAN2       |                   |           e3|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2 etc.|                         PC |                   |   SWITCH  e4||VirtualMachine 2            |                   |           e5|-to-eth1-VM1---wire-to-LAN2|eth0=VLAN3 eth1=VLAN4   eth1|---trunk-VLAN3&4---|g2         e6|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1|----------------------------|                   |           e7|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1 etc.                                                 |-------------|
  
  gX = Gigabit portseX = 100Mbit portsVMX = Virtual machine numberwire-to = patch-cord connection between ports on the switch
  
  Schema of routing and logical visibility:
  
  LAN1---VM1-----VM2---WAN              |LAN2----------|
  

  Important note is that LAN1 and LAN2 must be separated (visible only through routers). WAN must be visible through VM2 to LAN2 and through by VM1 and VM2 to LAN1. It seems easy, but VLAN that I did on this passage seems doesn't work.

  I do it like this:

  Step 1: Management of VLANS / create a VLAN...

  Creation of VLANS 1, 2, 3, 4 (numbers meters right now - I have now this number 1 is restricted to the switch).

  Step 2: Management of VLAN / Port to VLAN...

  Setting up VLAN1 with ports g1, e5 (the two labelled or not identified?-I have not seen any difference)

  Implementation VLAN2 with ports g1, e6, e7, etc...

  Implementation VLAN3 with ports g2, e2, e3, etc...

  Setting up VLAN4 with g2, e1 ports

  Step 3: Management of VLAN / Port setting...

  Implementation of ports e1 to PVID4 (chassis type = all I guess, but with "capture filter"?)

  Setting up port e2 at PVID3

  Setting up port PVID3 e3

  etc...

  Setting up port e5 for PVID1

  Setting up port e6 at PVID2

  Setting up port e7 for PVID2

  etc...

  Thus, on this configuration and that the switch it does not work for me

  I know that the switch is to see Mac since VLAN which is carried out by PC, because when I arrive in "Admin / dynamic address" I see pimps on the correct ports, with good VLAN ID. So the problem is to transmit a VLAN for their ports, then clear frames of ID and let the packets to go (and return: clear packages, add the VLAN ID and send to their Gigabit ports).

  Show the configuration is one of the many I tried :/ but I think this one is the best.

  Or maybe I don't know VLAN as I think and this scheme is impossible? Please tell me.

  Concerning

  and waiting for any suggestions,

  READ

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  * Do not forget to give a 'congratulations '. Thank you!

• Help with the VLAN and RVS4000

  I am trying to Setup VLAN on a RVS4000 to share our Internet connection with another office but do not allow access to our network of the other network. We have a BEFSX41 connected to Internet and also connected to our other site via a virtual private network to another BEFSX41. Port 1 on the BEFSX41 connects to Port 1 on an EZXS88W switch.

  The other company has provided the RVS4000 and also provides a WRT54GS router. I want to connect 2 ports on the BEFSX41 to Port 1 on the RVS4000 and 2 ports on the RVS4000 to track 1 on the WRT54GS.

  Port 1 on the RVS4000 is member of the default VLAN1 and Port 2 will be a member of VLAN2.

  Our IP network is 192.168.20.0/24

  BEFSX41 is 192.168.20.1

  The DHCP service is disabled

  The RVS4000 has a static IP address of 192.168.20.254 and is configured as a router

  DHCP is also disabled

  The wireless network is as follows:

  IP network is 192.168.21.0/24

  The address IP of WRT54GS is 192.168.21.254 and is static and also configured as a router.

  I don't know how to actually Setup the VLAN from here and the instructions are not useful. My questions are:

  1 port 1 on the RVS4000 must be safe, with label or Untagged?

  2 If the interval routing disabled?

  3. If so, how do I route between the RVS4000 and WRIGHT so the two networks have access to the Internet, but not to other networks?

  The befsx41 should be one that is connected to the internet so that your final point so that the vpn tunnel work. The wan port on the wrt54g must be connected to the lan of the befsx41 port.

  If your server is located behind the befsx41, you should be able to port forwarding. If your server is located behind the wrt54g you may experience the problem with the redirect because you need to forward ports on both routers and according to me, there are some applications that do not work on double NAT.

  If you want to have access to the internet on both VLAN of the rvs4000, it should work as a router so its internet port must be connected to the port the befsx41 lan.

• Configuration of VLAN 6248 - link IP subnet to the VLAN

  We have 200 node network with no VLAN (small private company that developed quickly)

  All nodes / devices / etc. of PCs spread evenly over 6 Dell 5448 switches with no regard for the Department, location or usage.

  (1) L3 is 6248 - we've added 6248 route VLANs (everything is on VLAN 1 still - i.e. without marking)

  (2) L2 several VLANS by switch - the best of cases, 2 VLANS by 5448

  (3) trunk / general uplink L2 s 5448 using LAG (44, 45 ports) - should be labelled all traffic, but since it will be a conversion / migration on an e-commerce network 24 x 7, we thought that we would have to do uplink between 5548 s and 6248 General and changes to the trunk later

  (4) for the conversion, all uplinks of trunk/general will have several VLANs marked as vlan1 untagged traffic

  (5) we know fixed us every VLAN gateway IP to the IP address of 6248 maintenance the VLAN, but can't decide how to proceed with no one-to-one correspondence of VLAN LAG uplink

  Questions on 6248

  Q1: we would use "bind the IP subnet to the VLAN ' the 6248 to configure routing between VLANS or do we define the belonging to a VLAN by LAG?

  Q2: would we be able to ping the IP of the bridge VLAN configured in the 6248 a down host link / node / PC marked for the same VLAN?

  Any suggestions would be most appreciated.

  On the 6248 allowing to the VLAN routing you must just ensure each VLAN has an IP address assigned to it:

  Console (config) #interface vlan 5

  Console (config - vlan) #ip address 192.105.1.1 255.255.255.0

  Then enable routing on the switch:

  Console (config) #ip Routing

  That's all that needs to be configured on the 6248 for VLAN routing to work. One thing to take steps, is that on the 6248 the management VLAN is not routable. By default, the management VLAN is VLAN 1. Two options are to move the management VLAN a VLAN different:

  Console # configure

  Console (config) #ip address vlan 99

  Or not use VLAN 1 at all. Place traffic on other VLANs.

  The answer to your second question is Yes. With the VLAN routing enabled a customer to any what VLAN should be able to ping the gateway of the 6248.

  When it comes to generals and trunk mode. General mode is like a combination of access and trunk, you can send several VLANS not identified. General mode is most commonly used on the 6200 switches when connecting with the new switches, trunk sometimes doesn't connect when it is connected to a most recent switch. I suggest using the general mode on the 6248 and if it works, leave it in general mode.

  Here is a list of various white papers which all have some good info to have.

  http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/networking/w/wiki/2580.networking-whitepapers.aspx

  6248 user's Guide

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_User%27s%20Guide2_en-us.PDF

  6248 cli guide

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

  5548 user's Guide

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524p_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.PDF

  5548 cli guide

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

  Having to update firmware of the switch can help with interoperability.

  6248

  http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-6248/drivers

  5548

  http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-5548/drivers

  See you soon

• Dell Powerconnect 5448 a reference on the vlan by default

  Hello

  Just a question.  A Dell Powerconnect 5448 switch will act as a home if its interfaces are configured with 1 interface connection to a primary switch that has the interface is 'access to the interface mode' by default with a vlan?  It will work with all its switches on vlan interface of uplink or would you need to configure both as the trunks to allow access vlan to work and this switch uplink?

  The 5448 is a layer 2 switch, which by default has a VLAN native of 1 with all interfaces in access mode for the native VLAN 1. On the VLAN native all frames are frames unmarked. So now that your uplink to the other switch port, all the info will be sent without label, which means the other switch will receive the unmarked data and then place it in the VLAN that is in access mode. Communication should work this way.

  However, I think using a network connection between the switches. The trunk port is used to connect the devices up-to-date with the switches / VLAN together and allow several VLAN tagged fell on it. Looks like you already have several VLANs on the network, and having a network connection will allow you to expand on it. At the same time everything that is on the VLAN native is always through the trunk to the other switch and will stay on the VLAN native.

• Channel Port LACP with VMWare ESXi IP hash Message: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: < MAC > host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port

  Hello

  Currently I have a VMWare ESXi host with 2 network including 6 cards (3 of each) ports are connected to a X 3750.  I configured LACP on the switch and the Port of vDS group road based on IP Hash (802.3ad), my looks of config as follows:-

  src-dst-ip port-channel load-balance

  Interface Port-channel15

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  bandwidth share SRR-queue 10 70 25 5

  form of bandwidth SRR-queue 10 0 0 0

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust dscp

  spanning tree portfast

  channel-protocol lacp

  active in mode channel-group 15

  Currently I see many MAC beat in the log of the switch.  From my understanding, I expect the MAC address out all ports, because that's what'd ESXi when you use 'route based on the hash of the IP.  I'm worried about the impact this might have on the CPU / switch.

  August 6, 09:42:05.700 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.0939 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/16 and article gi1/0/15

  August 6, 09:42:16.479 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.28e4 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/20 and 0/article gi1/17

  August 6, 09:42:18.719 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.7f6a to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/19 and article gi1/0/20

  August 6, 09:42:20.766 TSB: % SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: 0050.569e.0939 to host in the vlan 1 is flapping between port gi1/0/16 and article gi1/0/15

  Is it by design, if so can I disable the message?  If this isn't the case, please can you advise where I can check/change the configuration?

  Thank you

  Peter

  It is really gud who... .you mentioned your solution here.

  Can you please mark this question as answered, thatâ so it can help the other guys.

  Concerning

  Please rate if this can help.

• Help the VLANS on Cisco SG200 - 08 p switch voice and data

  Hi all

  I'm faced with a problem of configuration on the Cisco SG200 - 08 p.

  We use Cisco SG200 - 08 p on a mobile carriage which will go from classroom to classroom who will have computer and phone VoIP cisco plugged into it. The question is that each of our closets are in different VLANS (1 voice and 1 data... Let's say data vlan 20 and vlan voice 2025 for conversation) and which move towards every closet.

  It would be great if I could just create a vlan voice dynamically pick up this switch upstream has however and generic data, it seems that I was failed to do.

  So far, I can pass the data Vlan no probably. The upstream switch port is set to access port and a switch port access voice vlan (these are x 3750 switches)

  If the above is not possible, I guess I'll take what I can get. Should I create data vlan 20 and vlan2025 of the voice on the Cisco SG200 - 08 p and make a port on the Cisco SG200 - 08 p and a trunk trunk on the 3750 x? Is there an option on the Cisco SG200 - 08 p to tag voice traffic?

  I am also concerned about DRIFTING and I did not see an area in the Cisco SG200 - 08 p to set it as a customer and a transparent mode.

  Thanks for any help,

  Dan

  Playne,

  first the bad news, the switches for small businesses currently do not support VTP, they support the GVRP Protocol which is like VTP, but there is no State that the VLAN used it will not automatically learn as VTP.

  You should be able to configure the 3750 as a trunk with a vlan 1U or unmarked and vlan 2025 as the tag for the voice. configuration of the port on the switch to small businesses the same way to its home port. All ports which have only phones will be 2025U of access and all ports only PC would be access 1U. All ports of phone and computer would be trunk 1u, 2025T

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  Randy Manthey

  CCNA, CCNA - security

• SRW224G4: can't set the VLAN simple

  Hello

  My knowledge on him VLAN is somewhat limited, so please bear with me :-)

  The situation is like this:

  We have a small area demilitarized, where a (manageable) 3CDSG8 3COM switch is used. Internally, we have the SRW224G4. Now I have to make is a link 'safe' of our internal network on the 3COM switch.

  Then I configured the 3COM switch so that the management port to use a routable IP address internally, plus 55 its VLAN ID.

  Then I tried to Configure Port 2 of the SRW224GP also use 55 as its VLAN (VLAN is that only active, all other ports are set to 'Access'):

  * Management of VLAN-> Port setting

  E2-> Mode "General"-> frame Type 'Accept all'-> PVID "55"-> the active filtering of capture

  * Ports2VLAN for VLAN 55

  E2-> "Untagged" (but does not work with 'Tagged' as well)

  If I then try to ping the 3COM switch from our internal network, the rest is inaccessible.

  OTOH, if I change management VLAN-> Port setting like that...

  E2-> Mode 'access '.

  ... I can access the switch 3COM internally.

  But if I understand it right now, which leaves my 2 Port open for any kind of data, regardless of any VLAN ID used.

  ... So where I am going wrong? In my naïve world, this configuration is the "most trivial", but obviously I'm missing something...

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Apologies, I'm not trying to insult you, but my SRW224G4 is a layer switch 2 only, it can not 'road' IP packets over barriers VLAN. It is not a layer 3 switch.  He would need anything else as a router or switch three to be able to route between Gates VLANS layer. (if that's what you want)

  So, I guess the bottom line is you want 3COM to be part of the intranet and managed by behind the private side of the firewall?

  If this is the case then;

  In the 3COM switch

  step 1.  If you did the port of 3com 8 not marked one of the 55 VLAN, otherwise say no tag Ethernet frames will be evacuated outside the 3COM switch 8.

  Step 2, then do just the address of the 3COM say IP 172.20.10.3 address switch management.

  step 3. Fix the interface of the switch 3COM away from the default management VLAN and add it to 55 VLAN.

  In the SRW224G4

  step 1 then just connect a connecting cable to e3 (untagged already in the Vlan 1 because it is in access mode).

  My switch wouldn't know that unmarked packages coming out of the management of 3com interface are not members of the default VLAN, as Ethernet frames are not marked.

  These ethernet frames unmarked would mingle to VLAN1 packages ethernet frames in the SRW224G4.

  My switch would only see unmarked in the VLAN 1 3COM Ethernet frames and must assume that these images are also part of the VLAN1.

  The end result would be that the 3COM switch would be managed

  1. a 172.20.10.X network or a

  2 incoming VPN connection in the firewall.

  I hope this helps and be confused just the topic, I thought you need a approach and noticed that no one has answered your question.

  If I'm right, you owe me a beer when we meet then face to face :).  If it's completely out of context with what you ask, I can only ask for clarification or simplification of the question.

  What about Dave

• Client access in the VLAN with Any Connect

  I configured a router 1841 for SSL VPN and it works very well, the client connects and downloads all connect and then I create a VPN.  The question I have is that I have two VLAN on the router, the default VLAN 1 and 4 of VLANS on a void interface.

  The customer I can ping the IP sup and I can ping all IP addresses on a client in the vlan defautl, ping ends by request timed out so this suggests that the packet to the destination and fell on the way.  What I'm working on, it's how to connect any customer notice VLAN so it can connect to the computer in VLAN 4?

  I have not yet posted config in case it's a simple question that I need to do!

  Thank you

  Kyle

  Yes, if the Anyconnect pool is in the same subnet that vlan 4, then he would try to run the resolution arp instead of send traffic to the default gateway. I suggest that you change the pool of a single subnet, and you would need to modify the exemption ZBFW and NAT ACL accordingly.

• I have only a single ID and would like to know if its possible to monitor all the VLANS.

  With only one ID I I want to know if it is possible to monitor all my VLAN in the network. I use version 4 ID and VMS MC 1.1.

  If I have to set my internal addresses and those which I define as internal are considered as approved, in the case that I have configure a port in my central switch to monitor all the VLANS in my network and connect the ID to the destination monitor port to sniff all the VLAN, VLAN which I consider as an intern?

  Also, I have switches catalyst 6006 and 6509 with version 5.1 (3) and 12.1 in each case, can I apply for fleeing to take acctions when an attack is detected?

  Is it possible this configuration?

  Thanks for any help-

  I don't know if the ID is used to detect the specific activity you mentioned. You would need to go through our list of signatures to see if it's possible. You can even submit a new assignment and ask this question again.

  As for the actions.

  Cat OS 5.3 should allow you to be able to inject a TCP Reset packets through a span port (requires the parameter enable inpackets).

  In regards to the blocking with Cat OS 5.3, I don't think that this version supports the VACL. You may need to upgrade the version of the OS to chat if you want to block with VACL, and you also need a PFC and an MSFC on the supervisor.

  NOTE: If you have an MSFC making routing you may also block with the traditional router ACL on the MSFC.

  On the IOS running native 6509 (where IOS instead of the traditional CatOS runs on the prime contractor), there may be a problem with TCP resets. I don't know if the port of the monitor (equivalent IOS native span port) will allow the incoming TCP resets. You need to browse the documentation.

  Some versions of native IOS (I think that what you have newer versions) will also allow you to monitor through the capture of Vlan ACLS feature. If the sensor is followed by a VACL Capture port instead of a port monitor then I think that the TCP reset works OK, but I have not tested.

  With native IOS the sensor supports router blocking with the traditional ACL, it does not support blocking with Vlan ACL in native IOS.

  NOTE: The difference between router ACL and Vlan ACL is the Vlan ACL is applied to the vlan and applies to all packages comining and at the exit of the Vlan. While the router ACL is actually applied to the INTERFACE of the Vlan where an IP address has been assigned and only applies to packets routed in or off the Vlan.

  NOTE: Native IOS requires that the master has an MSFC even load the image.

• The vlan vmotion should join him vlan management for vmotion work?

  Host 1

  Management network is a vswitch. IP VLAN 350 172.31.250.201

  vMotion network is on an another vswitch. VLAN 500 IP 192.168.1.1

  Host 2

  Management network is a vswitch. IP VLAN 350 172.31.250.202

  vMotion network is on an another vswitch. VLAN 500 IP 192.168.1.2

  Running Cisco UCS, the vNIC for vmotion are the vlan 500 but vmotion works only when they have access to the vlan 350 the management vlan.

  Sorry for the question noob but not vmotion need access to the vlan management in order to work?

  Thank you

  No, what you're doing - vMotion running in a dedicated subnet - is actually recommended to do this. Ensure that the UCS switch ports are configured correctly, allowing the VLANS required.

  André

• Change the VLAN ID on a group of ports on a vSS

  We are changing the subnet that our vCenter VM resides on that will translate into change us vCenters IP address, subnet mask and gateway.

  He also goes to say that we must change the VLAN ID on the port group.

  My question is, can we change the Port Group VLAN ID first or first change vCenters details?. (So it is in VST Mode physical ports on the switch are trunk ports with say VLAN 100 and 200 with the new 300 of VLAN to add)

  Very welcome any suggetions. :-)

  Use the vSphere client to connect to the host that is running the VM vCenter.

  In this session of vSphere client, you can

  (a) change the VLAN switch vSS

  (b) open a console for the VM vCenter and change the IP settings it

  The vCenter VM will lose its network connection, but your session will continue to run, because you are connectly directly to a host (and no to vCenter).

  If the vCenter server is connected to an Active Directory server, then make sure to use a local administrative account or a domain administrator with cached credentials to connect.

  Furthermore, after you change the IP address of vCenter you will probably run the issue described here: http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1001493, but the article contains a resolution for this.

• the VLAN ID Sun subnet

  Hi all

  Once a company has started the configuration on the san and vpshere.  I have a question what they were doing to my id of vlan vmkernel san, they chose ALL (4095).  Is this fair?  My subnet on the san is 20.10.70.x, I also put it on the same subnet or leave it like that?  I know that my settings are complicated since I'm on cisco switch advance 3750 I can do for any connection junction subnet on two switches and other switches are used to connect san.

  Thanks for any comments, you can add...

  This is not a common configuration - marking is usually in the Group of ports or virtual switch. The only reason why you would do this is if the labelling was performed at the level of the physical switch - personally I would configure the VLAN evenly everywhere, for all networks - management, production, iSCSI and vmotion etc. marking at the level of the virtual switch