vMotion between a Quad Core computer host and a hexacore

Similar Questions

• "This problem was caused by a compatibility issue between Away Mode your computer system and your 64-bit version of Windows."

  Original title: "hp pavillion needs of troubleshooting"

  Printers and file devices it says my computer needs troubleshooting and this is the message I get after a repair...

  "This problem was caused by a compatibility issue between Away Mode your computer system and your 64-bit version of Windows." The system in the Away Mode is only compatible with 32-bit versions of Windows. This problem is not critical, but you can avoid it again by turning off the system Away Mode in the BIOS of your computer. Refer to the instructions provided with your computer that explain how to access the BIOS and disable the Mode system Away. »

  Where can I find instructions on disabling the system Away Mode?

  http://welcome.HP.com/country/us/en/support_task.html

  Go to the above link > 'See support and troubleshooting information' > key in your model number >, read the instructions.

  Or contact HP direct:

  http://welcome.HP.com/country/us/en/contact_us.html

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• I have a 15,4/2.2/2x2gb/500/SD/HR-AG/IEA Quad Core i7 macbook and I want to level do I need

  MacBook pro 2.2/2x2gb/500 do I need to upgrade

  Upgrade to what?

• 13 Firefox works in multithreaded mode and it can use the quad-core processors?

  When you buy a new PC, we choose between dual core vs quad core processors, and some people claim that Firefox work mode multithreaded mulch and treats each tab in a separate process and may fully use the advantage of a quad-core processor. Is this true?

  Firefox does not treat each tab in a separate process. If this can be a function in the future, I don't know of any plans to introduce any time soon. Obviously, buying a quad core processor will be significantly faster than a dual core, and your browser is usually less consume a lot of resources than other programs. I would not use it as your buying decision. Firefox will work just as well on a dual-core or a quad-core, but windows and other programs will work better with 4 cores.

• Processor Quad-Core HD Qosmio G50 and gesture of the controller error

  Hello
  I have a Qosmio G50 - 10v. For gesture controller request from the Toshiba.I site, I installed a gesture controller driver tried the English and German version, but for the Quad Core HD processor shows error. The message is
  like the following"Im Toshiba quad core HD processor Fehler aufgetreten ist. (CODE = 0X800A0100)
  Later, I formatted the pc and reinstalled the processor image driver and motion controller. When I open a Toshiba DVD player and watch DVDs, Quad core does not work and quad core shows 0%. So I watch movies with low definition.
  Please help me...
  How can I install the Quad core HD processor and controller of gesture?

  The "Toshiba Quad Core HD processor" gadget works when I've been upgraded / decommissioning or other video processing in the "Toshiba graphic Video Library»

  To check this, click on the red arrow on the left side of the gadget, click on "library graphic video Toshiba", right click on a video and select "vidéo Processing", then try and upconvert or downgrade a video according to what kind of video it is.

  Simple treatment should see the upper left quadrant the gadget turn orange or red while showing a percentage. Complex treatment, perhaps using one of the other programs in the menu drop down the gadget can do all four quadrants of the gadget actively processing colors/percentage of changes. I saw all active quadrant during certain functions of video processing. I've not seen it activates when not video processing.

  The program that you are running appears in the white box in the gadget under "request of race."

• VMotion between EVC cluster and native cluster

  Is vmotion between EVC cluster in Nehlem mode, and a standard cluster with Nehlem processors had problems?

  given that computers virtual are presented Nehlem CPU mode in clusters botyh as ok, it should work.

• updated to 16 MB on 2011 iMac 27.5 inch quad core will cause a slow start to the top?

  Have 27.5 inch iMac OSX 10.11.3 computer. The memory of 4 MB.  Recently updated to 16 MB.  Now have the very slow start up.  15 minutes.

  Should take 15 minutes to initialize 16 MB on a quad core computer?

  ewcbhc wrote:

  Have 27.5 inch iMac OSX 10.11.3 computer. The memory of 4 MB.  Recently updated to 16 MB.  Now have the very slow start up.  15 minutes.

  Should take 15 minutes to initialize 16 MB on a quad core computer?

  If you put expensive RAM and/or incorrect RAM then Yes. iMacs are very sensitive to the RAM and you must use quality RAM, more experienced on these forums users use OWC (www.macsales.com) or critical (direct purchase). RAM should also be installed in pairs. If you purchased anything else, then after a report of EtreCheck of your system and we can look for obvious problems.

• vMotion between hosts 4 ESXi and ESXi 5

  I have a group of ESXi 4.x hosts connected to a vCenter Server 4.1.  I have an another 5.1 vCenter Server Management 5.1 hosts.  I want to move my hosts ESXi 4.1 in my 5.1 vCenter Server and upgrade to 5.1.

  Since vCenter 5.1 can manage ESXi 4.x and 5.1 hosts in the same cluster (KB VMware: upgrading vCenter Server 5.1 recommended)

  Could I add my 4.x hosts to vCenter 5.1 and put them in maintenance mode one by one and then upgrade?  I'd be able to vmotion the VMs between my 4.x and ESXi hosts 5.1?

  The goal is to reduce or hopefully elimate downtime for virtual machines.

  Thank you!

  You can get the upgrade with no interruption of service, if you can:

  (a) connect the storage 4.1 hosts FC 5.1 guests, so it is shared by all hosts

  or

  (b) your license allows you to storage vMotion the VMS to storage of 5.1 hosts

  The normal steps would be:

  -Disconnect the 4.1 hosts the vCenter 4.1

  -Connect the 5.1 vCenter

  -connect storage 4.1 for the 5.1 hosts or Storage vMotion the VMs on

  -vMotion the VMs to 5.1 hosts

  -upgrade the 4.1 hosts

  Concerning

• vMotion between E5630 and e7540

  Hi all

  We can after activating the CVS vMotion between models of the following processors:

  Between

  Processor Intel Xeon E5630
  

  &
  

  Intel Xeon E7540

  
  

  
  

  Between

  Processor Intel Xeon E5630

  &

  Processor Intel Xeon E5640

  
  

  I went through the VCA compatibility chart but I don't understand it. Help, please.

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC & docType = kc & docTypeID = DT_KB_1_1 & externalId = 1003212

  New features in each generation of processor. However in order to migrate live virtual computer, the CPU characteristics presented to the virtual machine must be equal on the source and target host does not cause problems (such as BSOD). The different EVC baselines hide or reveal certain CPU features to the virtual machines that are common for all processors in the cluster. Table 1.1 in the article you mentioned some of these CPU features.

  André

• vMotion between hosts on different subnets

  Before you start, I'm a network engineer, not a server guru, please bare with me

  Is it possible to vMotion a virtual machine to a host on an IP network to another host, on a different IP network?

  Example:

  Data Center 1 - 10.1.1.1/24 with VM in the 10.1.2.0/24 ESX Server

  Same city, different site, binding fiber 10 GB between facilities 2ms latency

  Data Center 2 - 10.2.1.1/24 in the 10.2.2.0/24 with VM ESX Server

  Scenario:

  vMotion a computer virtual network 10.1.2.0/24 to the 10.2.2.0/24 network where virtual machine, on arrival on the ESX 2 data center server, now uses a IP address of 10.2.2.0/24.

  Any guidance towards a white paper or a guide would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you all for your time.

  -Chris

  Network engineer

  Press Ganey Associates

  vMotion is possible between hosts on different subnets, but unless your discussions presented to the virtual machines are on the same subnet, you will eventually drop the virtual machine on a VLAN different and IP addressing will fail.

  There are ways around this, you could script the change of IP address / present several IP addresses of the virtual machine / or reservations DHCP to use, but you will need to ensure DNS etc. records are updated.

  If you have some kind of load balancer, you could in theory balance workloads on 2 IPs hosted on the same VM, to solve the network ip address issues, although in the end, you'll want a VLAN tended to port VM coverage groups.

  Good luck

• Desktop PC's processor HP 251 - a11, Windows 10, AMD quad core A6-6310 accelerated with 4 GB memory DDR3 system and 500 GB hard drive. I installed I tunes last version and cannot operate.  Error message says Hello not activated.  Tells me to

  Desktop PC's processor HP 251 - a11, Windows 10, AMD quad core A6-6310 accelerated with 4 GB memory DDR3 system and 500 GB hard drive. I installed I tunes last version and cannot operate.  Error message says Hello not activated.  Tells me to go to the Control Panel then administrative tools and allow to Hello.  I followed these instructions, but I can't activate Hello.  What did wrong and how I can activate the Hello?  My email is * any help is greatly appreciated

  < email published by host >

  For general advice, see troubleshooting problems with iTunes for Windows updates.

  The steps described in the second case are a guide to remove everything related to iTunes and then rebuild what is often a good starting point, unless the symptoms indicate a more specific approach.

  Review the other boxes and other support documents list to the bottom of the page, in case one of them applies.

  More information area has direct links with the current and recent buildings if you have problems to download, must revert to an older version or want to try the version of iTunes for Windows (64-bit-for old video cards) as a workaround for problems with installation or operation, or compatibility with QuickTime software or a third party.

  Backups of your library and device should be affected by these measures but there are links to backup and recovery advice there.

  TT2

• VMotion between 2 remote hosts on the same site

  Hey everybody. I am new to a company that owns 2 Server vCenter, one in each data center, and we have a few servers standa-only (no not a cluster) in some places.

  All hosts are registered with several Enterprise. Let me draw the locations, you will have an idea:

  VCenter1

  -Datacenter1 (remote domain controller 01)

  * Host1

  ...

  * Host15

  2 VCenter
  

  -Datacenter2 (remote domain controller 01)

  * Host16

  ...

  * Host30

  -Data Center 3 (LAN)

  * HostLocal1

  * HostLocal2

  That make sense, as I have 15 guests on data center 1 and 2. We use 2 VCenter to manage the HostLocal1 and HostLocal2, but we don't group them together and we do not have vMotion among them, because all vMotion traffic must go to vCenter, then on the second host, is this right? Is there a way to prevent this?

  Let me rephrase: VMotion traffic would be like this:

  HostLocal1-> VCenter 2-> HostLocal2

  Or:

  HostLocal1-> HostLocal2.

  Wrote this question down make realize me that my hypothesis is incorrect, vMotion traffic has nothing to do with VCenter, activities stems from these 2 servers. Can anyone confirm?

  Thank you very much for your time.

  We use 2 VCenter to manage the HostLocal1 and HostLocal2, but we don't group them together and we do not have vMotion among them, because all vMotion traffic must go to vCenter, then on the second host, is this right? Is there a way to prevent this?

  Let me rephrase: VMotion traffic would be like this:

  HostLocal1--> VCenter 2---> HostLocal2

  Or:

  HostLocal1--> HostLocal2.

  vMotion traffic runs only between the source and the destination host ESX (i). The assumption that the traffic flows via vCenter's vMotion is downright bad. vCenter is simply required to initiate/control the vMotion between the hosts, but it is completely left out the data transferred between the host to move the virtual machine.

  The assumption that you need a cluster for vMotion object or clustering automatically implies vMotion won't as well.

• Can we do vmotion between hosts with load balancing in network cards grouping different strategy.

  Hello

  We are implementin new host in our Infra and do some vmotions between different groups. A group a host with balancing 'route based on IP hash. " Can we do Vmotion to another cluster where the hosts have different load balancing policies. In addition, if we change the policy on new hosts in furture of load balancing is loss of downtime or a package?

  Kind regards

  Vikram Kumar

  First of all, no problem from VMs one ESX to another, they use different political Multipathing.

  Second, if you use IP hash, it means you are using etherchannel (or LACP) on the physical layer - configuration/cancellation of the configuration that almost always require that the uplinks are not used by any VMs, so you have time to synchronize the physical and virtual configuration. It is not a time out, but you need to plan accordingly - all depends on your physical network capacity.

• Workstation 9 - slow network performance between the host and guest

  I am running windows 8 on the host and installed by 9 trial. Then installed windows 8.1 as a comment system.

  I'm a slow, very slow network between the two.

  If I send files to and from the computer with another guest, transfers are normal, but if I try the same files between the host and the guest, they are really slow.

  I use a bridge connection.

  I read elseware to disable the following on the guest card:

  Large Send Offload v2 (IPv4)

  Large Send Offload v2 (IPv6)

  But that did not help.

  Thoughts?

  Maybe then try Hyper-v, it help you better.

  report this incident to Vmware if you can

  Concerning

• VMotion between 2 Hosts with different processors

  Hallo,

  I have a server in my homelab I use for studies of VMsphere and I want to get a second machine to test advanced features such as HA, Vmotion etc.

  My first server has a map of X9SCM-9 with processor Xeon E3-1230V2 (Ivy Bridge). I am currently running ESX 5.0 U2 on it.

  I was counting on obtaining of material quality for the second host consumers because I don't want to spend a lot on it, so I thought that I need any CPU generation Ivy Bridge.

  I tested today with a second machine with a Pentium G2020 Ivy Bridge, but when I try to Vmotion he says "the virtual machine requires physical features that are not available or disabled on the host... ».

  So I figure there must be a difference in architecture regardless of the CPU beeing an Ivy Bridge CPU.

  When I try to activate CVS it just me are going to the 'Nehalem' Version so my virtual machines running on host 1 would not be able to use all the features of the CPU since the Xeon.

  So the question boils down to: what is the processor less which offer compatibility VCA L5?

  Or is there something else to consider in VMotion between two hosts with different processors?

  I got a shared storage, etc. of the same network configuration.

  Thank you

  Benjamin

  Hi Benjamin,

  For compatibility VCA L5 want to look at one of the following models, Intel CPU:

  • Ivy Bridge: Series E3-1200-v2
  • HASWELL

  I would recommend mental health that before rushing and a CPU purchase, check if a cheaper option would be, as Jon mentions in suppresss some fo the CPU compatibility checks so obviously, this is not desirable in a production environment, and must be applied in your study of VMware Lab to the home address.

  Hope this helps,

  Simon

  TechHead

  http://techhead.co