vpn port forward?

Similar Questions

• The ASA with crossed VPN Port forwarding

  Hello

  I worked on a question for a while and I have managed to track down the issue, but I don't know how to solve the problem.

  I have an ASA 5505 8.4 (7) running with a tunnel for incoming remote users anyconnect vpn. I also want to configure incoming Web server port forwarding.

  The question seems to be traversed rule which stops incoming port forwarding:

  NAT (outside, outside) NETWORK_OBJ_172.16.1.0_28 interface description dynamic source hairpin to natting users vpn on the external interface

  When I disable the port forwarding will work perfectly (according to tracer packet that is).

  I have attached the config to this post. I would appreciate any idea how to get the through VPN and the transfer to the incoming port working.

  The config has been condensed to remove unneed config.

  Thank you

  Hello

  What is the configuration commands, you use to put in place the static PAT (Port Forward)?

  The problem is most likely order of the NAT configurations such as configuring NAT above in the upper part of the NAT configurations.

  Configuring static PAT, that you could use to make it work would be

  the SERVER object network

  host

  service object WWW

  tcp source eq www service

  NAT (server, on the outside) of the interface to the static SERVER 1 source WWW WWW service

  The above assumes the source for the host interface is "Server" and the service that you want to PAT static TCP/80.

  Note that we add the number '1' in the 'nat' command. This will add at the top. The same should be done for any other static PAT you configure you want for these VPN Clients.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• PIX VPN & Port forwarding

  Hello!

  I installed a version the most recent Pix 6.x and have a few questions. Is it possible to have several ipadresses on the external interface? I want to connect to/from ipadresses different rules. For example, www should point to internal ip of the server. Also a VPN solution should work.

  IP outside the ISP must be aaa.bbb.ccc.82 and get VPN to work.

  I now need to allow outside aaa.bbb.ccc.90 address to accept ISPS Web server. Is it possible to get outside interface to both aaa.bbb.ccc.82 and 90 address answar? If so, I think I can work on a config.

  KR

  Mattias

  Mattias salvation,

  If I am the IP aaa.bbb.ccc.82 is the physical IP address of the PIX and th aaa.bbb.ccc.90 of intellectual property should be an outside IP of a server behind the PIX.

  In this case, you need only create a static entry in the PIX to meet these requests, like this (assuming that the outside and inside of the named interfaces 'outer' and 'inside' and inside the server IP is xx.yy.zz.90):

  static (Inside, Outside) aaa.bbb.ccc.90 xx.yy.zz.90 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Please let me know, otherwise it's the situation.

  Kind regards

  Roland

• VPN site to Site with NAT and Port forwarding on a 871

  Hello

  Could someone please look at the config 871 router attached and tell me where I'm wrong!

  VPNs all work, work, BUT anyone trying to connect to a port that is sent through the VPN port forwarding fails.

  In the config attached Port 3389 (RDP) is sent to an internal server, if you connect to the external interface Internet connection is made and it works well, but if someone tries to connect to the IP address internal to that same server through VPN, it does not.

  We've added commands to stop working on the lines VPN NAT, but these do not seem to work.

  What Miss me?

  Thank you in advance and I will adjudicate all useful responses.

  It is a common problem. Yes you added controls to prevent NAT to work above the tunnel, but your static nat port to port 3389 takes precedence over the generic nat command, and there not all orders top to prevent it is nat would be above the tunnel.

  I wrote an example configuration for this some time, see here for more details:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

  If all goes well, he explains everything. Note that it is for a general order static host, not a static port that you have, but the concept is exactly the same. Just add a statement roadmap on the end of your static command of the port, and this route map - will reference an ACL that denies are used when going up above the tunnel.

• VPN and port forwarding problem

  Hello

  I configured a VPN (IPSec) between 2 sites on Cisco 881 - K9.

  The server 'A', which the 192.168.0.X address must be accessible on port 80, 8080 and 90 of the public network.

  I have configured the ports of shipment with the command:

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 90 interface fastethernet 4 90

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 80 4 80 fastethernet interface

  IP nat inside source static TCP 8080 interface fastethernet 4 8080 192.168.0.X

  The server is accessible from the outside, the site in which it is located.

  But there is a problem with the second site:

  • I ping the server with its local address 192.168.0.X
  • But when I try to open a Web page that is using port 80 or 8080 or 90, the server appears inaccessible

  It seems that the problem is due to the translation of port because when I delete the configuration of port forwarding is no problem over on the second site.

  Thanks for your help

  Hello

  You need conditional NAT.
  When you want to Port Forwarding to work just for a part of traffic, e.g. when access to the server from the Internet
  but not for traffic entering via VPN, you can add a roadmap to the end.

  Thus,.
  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X PUBLIC_IP 4 xx xx map route VPN

  The road map tells when it is NAT that will to spend.
  It will always happen, but when traffic is coming from the VPN.

  Now... the problem is that you can add a roadmap, when you have a rule of Port forwarding to an IP address (and not an interface).

  Anyway, give it a try and let us know.

  Federico.

• Need help with the implementation of a VPN to bypass the port forwarding to access my web server

  Pretty much as the title suggests, but it's probably not clear enough. Let me explain:
  I want to host a Web site on my computer. Not another major, but something small and private.

  Before you set up a domain name, I want to make sure the site works - which it is not.
  I am currently using WAMPServer to organize it all.

  I put it so when I connect to localhost, I have access to all my files in the directory, regardless of whether or not I'm "online" or "offline" on WAMPServer (or not, others will have access to my Web page).

  When I turn WAMPServer 'on-line', it allows the connection of my WAMPServer homepage through both localhost and connection through the static IP address, I put in place, but only in LAN, meaning that only computers connected to my home network would have access to the page.

  My router cannot be configured to allow port forwarding for can I open a port to allow redirection to my computer, rather than the ambiguous router itself. As an alternative, I downloaded Hamachi to allow a computer to connect to the VPN (Hamachi) and, by extension, my IP for access to files in the directory.

  In theory, it should work, but it didn't. In my local network computers could still connect to the IP address, but the computer in the virtual private network, but not on the local network could not.

  Is there something I'm missing here, or is there any suggestions to make this work?

  Note:
  My works of static IP as what it is, however, it is different from the IP address used in Hamachi. If I change the IP address used by my computer to access the site to the IP address that uses my Hamachi, would that work? As another suggestion, can I change my static IP setting is automatic and change one used on WAMPServer (from localhost, allowing the connection to bring) than on Hamachi? Or I do all three IP addresses the same?

  Thanks for all the help and solutions,
  Elgo

  Domain/server/business questions are best addressed @ Technet.  Answers is more connected consumer.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• Unable to do port forwarding, to connect to the VPN and install Windows updates

  first of all, I tried to launch a minecraft Server trying to port forward, had problems with this, so I tried Hamachi, wouldn't connect to the VPN, then I tried Tunngle, at least, it was more useful, so I tried to use Device Manager to search for tunngle found when trying to manually install it, then he said that he could not or invaild something (or something of the sort) then it says windows may need to be put updated to fix this problem, so I tried to update to windows and it will not be updated, he is stuck at 0%, I tried the thing to download the patch to update windows and that has not helped,): I DO

  Original title: Windows Update will not be blocked at 0%

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community.

  Depending on your problem troubleshooting to establish a VPN connection, I recommend that you post your question in the TechNet forums. TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you.

  TechNet Forum

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?category=w8itpro

  Hope this information is useful.

• NETGEAR ProSafe VPN Firewall SRXN3205 and port forwarding?

  Hi, this is a long shot, but I'm pulling my hair out at this point and can be a bit over my head, as I am new on network

  Small short story, I have two servers, one is the NAS box (IE if I connect via the internet to the site via public IP network from home, I get it that site says 'my actions' I insert login and pass and get access to them.)
  That is, everything is peachy.
  The problem is when I try to connect to my FileMaker Server I'm not and instead, he takes me to the login NAS box. So I think ok, I need to port forward (5003 for filemaker) to go to different PC local LAN(192. etc)

  Security > firewall > Add Service entering:
  Service: fmserver
  Action: Always leave
  Send to LAN Server: unique address 192. etc is filemaker installed on (and different on a NAS)
  Definition of Port number: 5003<-- is="" this="" right?="" how="" else="" would="" you="" indicate="" you="" want="" all="" connections="" on="" this="" port="" to="" go="" to="" this="" specific="" lan="" machine="" from="" internet="" instead="" of="" default="" which="" seems="" to="" be="">
  rest is default, I click on apply.

  Here's what I don't understand. In the table of incoming Services, (security > firewall) I have two local IP in the list, a SIN, the other for Filemaker. But only the top works and can be connected to. I can move every top position and it will work, but they will not work at the same time, just the one that sits on the top of the sad Smiley page

  and yes I read the manual again and again and don't know how I'm screwing up the port forwarding on this point, even if I am brand new to probably something stupid Smiley Happy (our work IT guy is gone so tried to get involved through this somehow)

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello sinieq,

  There is a hierarchy on incoming service table, which is normal. I see 4 services added using "ANY" (ALL use any port number) you will need to remove/disable these because of the rule of the hierarchy on the table, all other services will be ignored when EVERYTHING is used. What is the port number used by the NAS Server? I don't see a port defined to access NAS. Try disabling services by using "ANY" and try again by adding the translation to the port number of the NAS.

  Let us know what happens.

  Thank you

• Implementation of IPSec Port Forwarding on a Windows 2012 with a LRT224 Server

  Hi all I hope someone can help me validate my troubleshooting. I'm deploying a Server Windows 2012 that will server as a server vpn for customers. In place is a LRT224 with 4 VLANS set up. I have enabled port forwarding for IPSec (UDP/500), L2TP (UDP/1701) and L2TP (UDP/4500) to go on the server.

  In my Initial test, I put the LRT224 on the same network as the client of my test and realized the Test Client (10 Windows) to try to connect to the WAN of the LRT224 interface. I get this message:

  

  Thinking it could be the configuration of the server, I then put the client system on the same vlan on the LRT224 server. When I tried to connect to it directly by using the IP address of the server as a destination, he succeeded.  It is leading me to believe that it is the LRT224.

  I confirmed that VPN passthrough is enabled.

  The firmware version is by: v1.0.5.03 (February 22, 2016 10:12:17)

  Currently, the firewall is disabled (I would activate once I'm working)

  If anyone has ideas or notice a fault in my tests, I would really appreciate the feedback.

  If additional information would be useful, please let me know what you want and I can work for it.

  Thanks to all in advance.

  FreeFallFour wrote:

  I then put the client system on the same vlan on the LRT224 server. When I tried to connect to it directly by using the IP address of the server as a destination, he succeeded.  It is leading me to believe that it is the LRT224.

  It does normally not as I KNOW because the VPN in an outside in the process. You should test the VPN connection outside the server's IP subnet.

  You have the server configuration that the DNS server in the router to DHCP with DNS Proxy is disabled?

  Are you doing load balancing Internet connection?

• WAG160Nv2 v2.00.21 Port Forwarding

  Hello my problem is that I was not able to setup port forwarding.

  WAG160Nv2 Firmware V2.00.21 (I think that Schedule A)

  configuration:

  • only the port forwarding: all OFF
  • forwarding port range: 40000 to 54000 two PC ip protocols
  • PC connects with static IP below 192.168.1.100 from where starts DHCP server on the router
  • trigger port range: all OFF
  • QoS (Quality of Service): all OFF
  • DMZ: OF
  • Access restrictions: disabled
  • SPI Firewall / filters / block WAN requests: all OFF
  • VPN Passthrough: OFF
  • Isolation of the AP: OFF
  • NAT: WE
  • RIP: disabled
  • uPnP: OFF (I tried in combination with ALG)
  • IGMP proxy: OFF
  • SIP ALG: OFF (I tried in combination with uPnP)
  • already pressing reset for a long time after the firmware update, lost all the settings (the number of seconds that I have to press it? (I must have tried 30 +) Factory Defaults did the same thing?

  How I checked:

  • Transmission (torrent program): use uPnP or NAT - PMP router is DISABLED, use port = 40101, port test shows closed
  • Nmap Pei 40000-54000 - T4 - A - v 192.168.1.1 which gives «...» All scanned ports 14001 on 192.168.1.1 are closed... »
  • EDIT: also checked http://www.canyouseeme.org/ AND http://www.portchecktool.com/
  • EDIT: have you: netstat - LNP | grep 40101 on my PC
    TCP 0 0 0.0.0.0:40101 0.0.0.0: * LISTEN 26429/transmission.
    tcp6 0 0: 40101: * LISTEN 26429/transmission.

  Thank you very much in advance

  What is your internet IP address, tsester? I think that there is a double NAT on your network. If you get a private IP address, I suggest that you contact your ISP and your current subscription go to full bridge mode. Next, configure the router again based on the new settings and see if it will solve the problem.

• port forwarding for file sharing on the internet.

  I am trying to determine what port numbers, I need to transfer to my router (in virtual server) to be able to share my NAS files over the internet with my friends? I want to use file sharing, have implemented a DDNS on the NAS with a client account to my dynamic IP address, but cannot get the numbers correct port developed to be able to configure port forwarding. Can anyone help?

  Hello

  Open sharing Ports that are used on a local area network on the Internet is a Big safety hazard.

  There are secure applications that are built for this purpose, they use their own ports and generally are safe (as on the VPN or SSH).

  A free quick simple way is shared through secure ftp server. http://FileZilla-project.org/

  An elegant way door application like this, http://download.cnet.com/WebDrive/3000-2160_4-10017919.html

  In general, http://www.practicallynetworked.com/howto/fileshare/fileshare_intro.htm

  Jack-MVP Windows Networking. WWW.EZLAN.NET

• Issue from site to site of SRP527w port forwarding

  

  Hello

  I have problem with setting up port forwarding on the VPN between two cisco 527w.

  Scenario when we see a tunnel VPN from Site to Site between Site A and B; a printer behind Site B must be accessible using the IP WAN of A Site address.

  Like the picture above:

  -From site A, I am able to ping printer and printer access locally and via 120.146.x.x with port forwarding to installation on site has to the printer.

  -From site B, I am able to ping A site gateway but not able to access the printer through 120.146.x.x. The printer can be access via 129.203.x.x if port forwarding is configured on the site B on the printer.

  Cisco SRP 527w supports port forwarding via VPN site-to-site site A to site B printer?

  Y at - it no suggest or another solution for this scenario?

  Some help would be very appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Thai

  Hi thai,

  I'm not entirely sure - I think that an IOS based router, for example, the 800 series, you could do with proper setup.

  I would say that remote access to a printer or a server like this is perhaps not the most secure solution however.  A better approach would be to use a router that supports both a remote access VPN site.  With this, you must be able to use a VPN client to access the site with the IP address static, then tunnel to the other site where the device is.  You might consider the series RV of the device as well as IOS routers for that.

  Kind regards

  Andy

• How can I enable port forwarding in the router of the time capsule

  Does anyone know how to enable port forwarding in router Time Capsule Airport please?

  Port Mapping on the time Capsule airport cannot be enabled unless you have the right type of modem on your network.

  Thus, we need the number of brand and model of the device you're calling your "modem" before we can move forward. Please post back this information.  We do not need a series number... only the name of the manufacturer and model number of the modem.

• Why isn't my port forwarding of the opening port

  I have the latest version of the 3 terabyte time capsule. I'm trying to forward a port so I can access my security cameras and it does not open.  My camera 100 port needs to be open and it will report as not open on any port test sites. Any ideas as to why, I use a static ip address of the server for the security system.

  Testing websites are useless... test by plugging actually to the camera from a device attached to a captive phone or a friend...

  Port forwarding works only if you have the public IP address on the Wan of the TC... and it's the only router in the network... is this the case?

• your external IP address for port forwarding

  OK, so I want to do a game server, but... There need Port Forwarding, so I called my InternetServiceProvider "Clear."

  Claire told me that "WE DO NOT support the external Ip addresses: then I was then told that I have to call HP because that's what my PC is under.

  I decided to go to the site and ask because they want a $ 60 million tax which is good, but... I don't have the money! This is why I need a server. In any case if you can please give me a video or tell me how do it in the response that would be LARGELY APPRECIATED!

  -Sincerely

  VladmirTodd

  Go to portforward.com and use their tutorials.