VPN split Tunneling does not

Similar Questions

• Router Cisco client VPN SPlit tunnel does not work

  Hello!
  I have configured the Cisco VPN CLient on a 2821 router, and it works fine.
  I could access the inside resourses normally >
  the problem is that when I connect with VPN I lost internet connectivity?

  What wrong with my setup?

  Below the current configuration of the router.
  Kind regards!

  CISCO2821 #sh run

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 5834 bytes

  !

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  hostname CISCO2821

  !

  boot-start-marker

  start the flash c2800nm-adventerprisek9 - mz.124 - 20.T.bin system

  boot-end-marker

  !

  forest-meter operation of syslog messages

  logging buffered 51200 warnings

  !

  AAA new-model

  !

  !

  connection local VPN-LOCAL-AUTHENTIC AAA authentication

  local AAA authorization network VPN-LOCAL-AUTHOR

  !

  !

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  !

  dot11 syslog

  IP source-route

  !

  !

  IP cef

  !

  !

  "yourdomain.com" of the IP domain name

  8.8.8.8 IP name-server

  No ipv6 cef

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  !

  voice-card 0

  No dspfarm

  !

  !

  username secret privilege 0 vpn 5 $1$ tCf1$ XAxQWtDRYdfy9g3JpVSvZ.

  Archives

  The config log

  hidekeys

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 44

  BA aes

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  life 44444

  !

  ISAKMP crypto group configuration of VPN client

  key VPNVPNVPN

  VPN-pool

  ACL VPN-ACL-SPLIT

  Max-users 5000

  !

  !

  ISAKMP crypto ISAKMP-VPN-profile

  identity VPN group match

  list of authentication of client VPN-LOCAL-AUTHENTIC

  VPN-LOCAL-AUTHOR of ISAKMP authorization list.

  client configuration address respond

  Configuration of VPN client group

  virtual-model 44

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set VPN - SET esp - aes esp-sha-hmac

  !

  Crypto ipsec VPN-profile

  transformation-VPN-SET game

  Set isakmp VPN ISAKMP-PROFILE

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.2.214 255.255.255.0

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1412

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1412

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0/0

  no ip address

  Shutdown

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  type of interface virtual-Template44 tunnel

  IP unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0

  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

  Tunnel ipsec VPN-PROFILE protection profile

  !

  interface Dialer0

  no ip address

  IP mtu 1452

  IP virtual-reassembly

  Shutdown

  !

  local pool IP VPN-POOL 192.168.1.150 192.168.1.250

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP http server

  IP 8081 http port

  23 class IP http access

  local IP http authentication

  no ip http secure server

  IP http timeout policy slowed down 60 life 86400 request 10000

  !

  !

  IP nat inside source list ACL - NAT interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

  !

  IP access-list standard ACL-TELNET

  allow a

  !

  extended ACL - NAT IP access list

  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  IP extended ACL-VPN-SPLIT access list

  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  scope of access to IP-VPN-ACL-SPLIT list

  !

  control plan

  !

  exec banner ^ C

  % Warning of password expiration.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  Professional configuration Cisco (Cisco CP) is installed on this device

  and it provides the default username "cisco" single use. If you have

  already used the username "cisco" to connect to the router and your IOS image

  supports the option "unique" user, that user name is already expired.

  You will not be able to connect to the router with the username when you leave

  This session.

  It is strongly recommended that you create a new user name with a privilege level

  15 using the following command.

  username secret privilege 15 0

  Replace and with the username and password you want

  use.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  Line con 0

  exec-timeout 0 0

  Synchronous recording

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  ACL-TELNET access class in

  exec-timeout 30 0

  privilege level 15

  Synchronous recording

  transport input telnet ssh

  line vty 5 15

  ACL-TELNET access class in

  exec-timeout 30 0

  privilege level 15

  Synchronous recording

  transport input telnet ssh

  line vty 16 988

  ACL-TELNET access class in

  exec-timeout 30 0

  Synchronous recording

  transport input telnet ssh

  !

  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

  end

  CISCO2821 #.

  I think that you made a mistake with your ACL name. the ACL applied is "VPN-ACL-SPLIT" which is an empty ACL. You must switch to that of "ACL-VPN-SPLIT" that has the entry "ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255" inside.

• Easy VPN between two ASA 9.5 - Split tunnel does not

  Hi guys,.

  We have set up a site to site vpn using easy configuration vpn between ver 9.5 race (1) two ASA. The tunnels are up and ping is reached between sites. I also configured split tunnel for internet traffic under the overall strategy of the ASA easy vpn server. But for some unknown reason all the customer same internet traffic is sent to the primary site. I have configured NAT to relieve on the side of server and client-side. Please advise if no limitation so that the installation program.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Arjun T P

  I have the same question and open a support case.

  It's a bug in the software 9.5.1. See the bug: CSCuw22886

• Split Tunneling does not

  I'm working on an installation of the laboratory program at home with my X-5506, and I got a split tunneling configuration problem.  Every change I seem to give me internet access, gives me access to the local network or remove both.  The current configuration, I took them both and I am a little puzzled.  I have attached the configuration.  Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!

  Change:

  split-tunnel-policy excludespecified

  TO:

  split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  I notice you are using 192.168.0.0/24. Make sure that you do not work VPN'ing an address 192.168.0.0/24 as well (or a subnet that is also identical to your subnet that you are trying to access remotely) or it won't work. Overall, you should avoid using 10.0.0.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 in production networks because they are so frequently used in home networks. I also note that you have configured IKEv2. IKEv2 does not support split tunneling. SO be sure you use only the AnyConnect client in SSL mode.

• Help: Customer Cisco VPN & Split Tunnel but not Internet

  Hi Forum.

  We are faced with this problem: after having successfully open a VPN connection with the Cisco VPN Client to a router Cisco, the rest of the world are not properly available more.

  This is what has been verified / so far attempted to identify the problem on a Windows Vista computer:

  -Router: Split Tunneling is allowed according to sysop

  -On the VPN-Client: "allow Local Lan access" is checked

  -On the Client (statistics): only STI VPN-rout configured listed unter "guarantee routes." "Local Lan routes" is empty.

  -Calling 'http://www.google.com' in IE fails

  -Call ' 74.125.232.116' (IE IP) IE works / ping the IP works.

  -nslookup properly lists the current DNS server

  -nslookup www.google.com resolves correctly the name of intellectual property

  It seems that it is not that the connection with the rest of the Internet is deleted, but DNS resolution fails somehow, even though all signs point to the appropriate DNS server is in force and although the command line can resolve the name.

  does anyone have a tip how to debug this correctly?

  No worries Pat...

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  -Please evaluate solutions

• Remote VPN: split tunnel filtering

  Hello!

  The question is about the split tunnel filtering capabilities without using the vpn-filter.

  Suppose, we have ASA configured for remote VPN tunneling with split without VPN filter.

  • 10.0.0.0/8 is the private netwrok.
  • 10.1.0.0/24 is the private network, defined in the split tunnel
  • 172.16.1.0/24 is the VPN SECURE network

  When the remote client connects, it receives the routes to the private network (10.1.0.0/24).

  What happens if the remote client adds the route to a private network (which is not defined by a tunnel of split) by itself (e.g. 10.2.0.0/24)?

  Our test LAB, we can see that the customer does not have access to 10.2.0.0/24.

  Where the place in this case filtering?

  • By default, all vehicles coming from VPN, bypasses all ACLs configured on interfaces ASA.
  • Filter VPN is not configured.
  • Nat0 don't traffic 10.0.0.0/8 to 172.16.1.0/24 NAT
  • of the sh ip cry his on the VPN server, we can see, this ident is 0.0.0.0/0
    • local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0)
    • Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.16.1.1/255.255.255.255/0/0)

  The ACL of split tunnel is capable for remote client traffic filtering?

  I understand that your question is in what regards the IPSec VPN Client, no AnyConnect VPN Client, however, I think that the behavior of the split tunnel is the same.

  Here's the answer to your question:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-1361#Q_How_does_the_AnyConnect_client_enforcemonitor_the_tunnelsplittunnel_policy

  A. AnyConnect applies the policy of tunnel in 2 ways:

  Monitoring of track 1) and repair (for example if you change the routing table), AnyConnect will restore it to what has been configured.

  (2) filtering (on platforms that support filter engines). Filtering ensures that even if you can perform a kind of injection of the route, the filters would block packets.

• VPN between ASA does not

  Hello world

  hope you can help us with a problem.

  We try to create a tunnel vpn site-to-site between offices in different countries. We create 4 vpn tunnel, 3 of them are working right now, but there is an ASA which does not allow the connection.

  On our side, we have an ASA 5516 running firmware version 9.5 (1) that has this configuration:

  ti_jamaica list of allowed ip extended access any object host_10.10.10.252

  NAT (inside, outside) 1 dynamic source any destination host static 10.10.10.252 host_10.111.0.10 host_10.10.10.252

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-256 ikev1, esp-md5-hmac ts_jamaica

  card crypto vpnpbs 1 match address ti_jamaica
  card crypto vpnpbs 1 set of peer XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  card crypto 1 ikev1 transform-set ts_jamaica set vpnpbs

  tunnel-group, type ipsec-l2l XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key vpn1234

  internal GroupPolicy_xxx group strategy
  attributes of Group Policy GroupPolicy_xxx
  Ikev1 VPN-tunnel-Protocol

  Crypto ikev1 allow outside
  IKEv1 crypto policy 11
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  

  On the other side, our office has an ASA (don't know the model) running firmware version 8.2 with this configuration

  permit access list extended ip host 10.10.10.252 Outside_21_cryptomap 10.111.0.10

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac

  crypto Outside_map 21 card matches the address Outside_21_cryptomap
  card crypto Outside_map 21 set pfs
  card crypto Outside_map 21 peer set XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  card crypto Outside_map 21 the transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 value

  tunnel-group, type ipsec-l2l XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  pre-shared-key vpn1234

  crypto ISAKMP policy 170
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  but I get this error on «See the ikev1 debugging»

  11 February 15:32:06 [IKEv1] group = IP XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, Session = is to be demolished. Reason: The user has requested

  11 February 15:32:11 [IKEv1] Group = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, removal table correlator counterpart has failed, no match!

  I already check that this error message, it indicates that there is a configuration issue between both sides of the VPN, according to the manual, it the encryption and hash does not match their topic, but we think we have the right configuration.

  I appreciate any help or advice on your part.

  Best regards

  First of all your cryptographic domains do not match, correct so that the first.  They are the same on both sides.

  That's what they say.

  access-list ti_jamaica extended permit ip any object host_10.10.10.252

  And the other.

  access-list Outside_21_cryptomap extended permit ip host 10.10.10.252 host 10.111.0.10

• IPSec tunnel does not work

  Hi all

  We have an IPSec tunnel that does not work. I think that Phase 2 is not established but I don't know why.

  Add the output and the newspaper.

  Thanks for your help

  ASA-VPN-PRI/act/pri # sh crypto isakmp his
  !
  13 peer IKE: 91.209.243.5
  Type: L2L role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

  !

  ASA-VPN-PRI/act/pri # sh crypto isakmp his | include the 91.209.243.5
  12 peer IKE: 91.209.243.5
  ASA-VPN-PRI/act/pri #.

  ASA-VPN-PRI/act/pri # sh crypto ipsec his | include the 91.209.243.5
  ASA-VPN-PRI/act/pri #.

  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = c516994b) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d6c)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d6c)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:48 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 29bf4142) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = b72ddf0a) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d6b)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d6b)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:43 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = ae5305df) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = b796798d) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d6a)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d6a)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:38 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 98241c 63) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = e233621d) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d69)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d69)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:33 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 36ecdf6a) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = cb1b978d) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d68)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d68)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: is.40:28 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = f25bcdb5) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 32bca075) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, build payloads of hash qm
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715046 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of empty hash construction
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715036 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, sending persistent type DPD R-U-HERE-ACK (seq number 0x7d67)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715075 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, received persistent type DPD R-U-LÀ (seq number 0x7d67)
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, processing notify payload
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 715047 | Group = 91.209.243.5, IP = 91.209.243.5, payload of hash of treatment
  7. December 17, 2014 | 15: 40:23 | 713236 | IP = 91.209.243.5, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = a3f0e3f9) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84

  Please repeat the debug with "debug crypto isakmp 100". And compare the config of the Phase 2 on both sides:

  1. Is what ACL crypto exactly in the opposite direction on both sides?
  2. Your transformation sets include exactly the same algorithms?

• AnyConnect VPN full tunnel could not access the site to site VPN

  I have a set of AnyConnect VPN upward with no split tunneling (U-turning/crossed traffic), running 8.2.5 code.

  It works fine, but I want to allow customers to AnyConnect VPN site to site, which I was unable to access.

  I checked the IP addresses of network anyconnect are part of the tunnel on both sides.

  My logic tells me that I must not turn back traffic from the network anyconnect for the site to site VPN, but I don't know how to do this.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Here are the relevant parts of my config:

  (Domestic network is 192.168.0.0/24,

  the AnyConnect network is 192.168.10.0/24,

  site to site VPN network is 192.168.2.0/24)

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface
  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  the DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 object-group network
  object-network 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
  object-network 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed object-group ip DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list inside_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  outside_1_cryptomap list extended access allowed object-group ip DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  mask 192.168.10.2 - 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0 IP local pool AnyConnectPool
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  access-outside group access component software snap-in interface outside
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (the gateway IP) 1
  WebVPN
  allow outside
  AnyConnect essentials
  SVC disk0:/anyconnect-win-3.1.05152-k9.pkg 1 image
  SVC profiles AnyConnectProfile disk0: / anyconnect_client.xml
  enable SVC
  tunnel-group-list activate
  internal AnyConnectGrpPolicy group strategy
  attributes of Group Policy AnyConnectGrpPolicy
  WINS server no
  value of 192.168.0.33 DNS server 192.168.2.33
  VPN-session-timeout no
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec svc
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall
  the address value AnyConnectPool pools
  type tunnel-group AnyConnectGroup remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group AnyConnectGroup
  address pool AnyConnectPool
  authentication-server-group SERVER1_AD
  Group Policy - by default-AnyConnectGrpPolicy
  tunnel-group AnyConnectGroup webvpn-attributes
  the aaa authentication certificate
  activation of the Group _AnyConnect alias

  Your dial-up VPN traffic as originating apears on the external interface, so I think you need to exonerate NAT pool PN traffic directed to the site to site VPN. Something like this:

   global (outside) 1 interface nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 nat (outside) 0 access-list outside_nat0 nat (outside) 1 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 access-list outside_nat0 extended permit ip any 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

• Satellite U840W - Toshiba Split Screen does not work

  Hi all

  My laptop is a Toshiba Satellite U840w. I reinstalled a new version of windows 8 pro but I lost all the software by default.

  I decided to download Toshiba Split Screen to enjoy my 21:9 screen, but the problem is that it does not work!

  When I run it, I can open his window to turn it but it does not appear in the notification area, and nothing happens.

  I don't really know what to do, I hope someone has a solution. Thank you.

  Kind regards.

  Hello

  I guess you have not installed all necessary drivers, tools and utilities that are available on the page of the Toshiba UE driver.

  Make sure that you have installed the software suite next to the Split Toshiba screen utility
  -Driver Toshiba system
  -Toshiba system configuration utility
  -Toshiba utility function of key
  -Desktop Toshiba Assist

• In split view does not not on 15 "rMBP

  Can someone give me some knowledge about why the Mode split has has stopped working? (It used to work before version 2.0.4 of El Capitan)

  This is really useful and I really need it works again. I tried restarting, try with the mail; Chrome; Monitor activity & Notes. I don't know how to activate it, just hold the button in the upper left corner (if full screen). If you need the activity logs or anything made me know. Please help, Will be.

  Details (no personnel is to say in detail. Serial number)MacBook Pro (retina, 15 inches, beginning 2013) 2.4 GHz Intel Core i7 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Intel HD Graphics 4000 1536 MB

  For general information about split view, see these articles to support:

  Use both Mac applications side by side in split view

  Focus on applications in full-screen or split mode

  Please note the following points:

  1. If certain applications to open in split mode and others are not, these need to be updated by their developers to support. If an application does not support full screen, it supports also not split.

  2. If no apps open in split mode, follow the instructions in the support article first link above to activate "poster have separate areas."

• VPN error 809 does not work

  I have a windows vista, before my vpn network worked perfectly, but when the update sp2 vpn does not work again so could any body can help me with this sound like Windows have no clue at all to this subject, so far I try most of the answers

  but none works

  Support FREE from Microsoft for SP2:

  https://support.Microsoft.com/OAS/default.aspx?PRID=13014&Gprid=582034&St=1

  Free unlimited installation and compatibility support is available for Windows Vista, but only for Service Pack 2 (SP2). This support for SP2 is valid until August 30, 2010.

  Microsoft free support for Vista SP2 at the link above.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Authentication of VPN 3000 Client does not

  Get the following error trying to authenticate on VPN 3020: Xauth required but winning proposal does not support xauth, of audit priorities of the xauth list proposal ike ike proposals

  Not really sure what it means.

  Find the proposals on the VPN3020 IKE (location varies depending on the version, so I can't tell you where). You will find some are active, others do not. Make sure that one is active when the authentication method is "pre-shared keys (xuauth)" with something like MD5, 3DES, DH group2.

  If you see a proposal named "CiscoVPNClient-3DES-MD5" that will do the trick.

• Client VPN router IOS does not connect

  Hi all

  I'm having some trouble of Client VPN connection over the internet to our Cisco IOS router. Some help would be very appreciated!

  On the VPN client log I get the following error messages:

  ---------------------------

  ...

  573 16:32:13.164 21/12/05 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE3000099

  Size invalid SPI (PayloadNotify:116)

  574 16:32:13.164 21/12/05 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0xE30000A4

  Invalid payload: said length of payload, 568, not enough Notification:(PayloadList:149)

  575 16:32:13.164 21/12/05 Sev = WARNING/3 IKE/0xA3000058

  Received incorrect message or negotiation is no longer active (message id: 0x00000000)

  ---------------------------

  We get debugging on the router that I'm trying to connect:

  ---------------------------

  router #debug isakmp crypto

  ...

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP (0:0): received 203.153.196.1 packet dport 500 sport 500 SA NEW Global (N)

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 203.153.196.1, peer port 500

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x678939E0 peer_handle = 0 x 80000031

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x678939E0, refcount IKE peer 1 for crypto_isakmp_process_block

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: insert his with his 67B0AB34 = success

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP (0:0): payload ID

  next payload: 13

  type: 11

  ID of the Group: eggs

  Protocol: 17

  Port: 500

  Length: 12

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): peer games * no * profiles

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): load useful vendor id of treatment

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): supplier code seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 215

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): provider ID is XAUTH

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): load useful vendor id of treatment

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): provider ID is DPD

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): load useful vendor id of treatment

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): supplier code seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): load useful vendor id of treatment

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): supplier code seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): provider ID is NAT - T v2

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): load useful vendor id of treatment

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): provider ID is the unit

  21 Dec 16:32:16.089 AEDT: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...

  .....

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): audit ISAKMP transform 12 against the policy of priority 3

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: MD5 hash

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: group by default 2

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xC4 0x9B

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): pre-shared authentication offered but does not match policy.

  21 Dec 16:32:16.093 AEDT: ISAKMP: (0:0:N / A:0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3

  ---------------------------

  You can apply the encryption the WAN interface card and check?

• Audition Audio 'Split function' does not?

  Have no idea why, but on my old Adobe audition 3.0 version (which works perfectly), when I go to multitrack view and want to change a track - requiring the split function - it does not work.   I pull up the menu and 'split' is one of the options (normal) - then I left click on the position where I want to change the audio track.  (normal)  THEN, when I use the right click and HOLD function on the mouse to "drag" the piece of splitting the audio down in another (normal) track, now it does not work - nothing happens.   Our here does he know why it can happen?  Very frustrated.  Is there a secondary way, I can try to 'split' or separate and 'move' the play published audio... when done, I then MIX again...

  For the record - I CAN cut section and paste it into another track, but I can't MOVE the tracj with my my right click on the mouse.

  make people of sense?  pls advise - Johnny W

  You have the right hybrid tool, selected from among the four tool icons in the menu bar? You don't do a right-click and drag if you have the choice of time or scrub tool selected.