We will encrypt on OS 6.5?

Similar Questions

• BlackBerry 10 features and functionality we will encrypt input support?

  None of the browsers or former BlackBerry supports free SSL certificates available now at we will encrypt. Any browser on any platform supporting the real we will encrypt root certificate yet, but for now they get their cross-signed by IdenTrust certificates, which means they work in browsers more desktop and mobile, with the exception of the old Windows XP and Android (2.3.5) ones. Unfortunately even the latest browsers BB10 recognize certificates, probably because the IdenTrust root is not installed.

  I have not tried, but I suspect the we will encrypt or IdenTrust roots could be installed manually, but most of the BB10 users who may want to visit our sites safely have no idea how to install this certificate root and should not have anyway. Get the Let's encrypt root installed as a built-in root in browsers BB10 would help to achieve the goal of the Internet Security Research Group to all web sites of the encrypted world. We will encrypt will probably soon huge, does anyone know if the BlackBerry has plans to support we will encrypt or IdenTrust?

  10.3.3 BlackBerry will have confidence we will encrypt built in, but for every one who executes 10.3 - 10.3.2 you can add now we will encrypt BlackBerry 10 trust with just two clicks using my multiCERT totally free application.

  multiCERT on BlackBerry World

• BlackBerry 10 functions and features of let's browser and encryption certificate?

  How can I get the browser to accept sites using certificates we will encrypt? I added CA of the certificates in the settings but still complains the browser.

  You've added DST Root CA X 3?

• IPSEC encryption package is encrypted

  IPSec will encrypt a package that is already encrypted? Don't care if IPsec package is already encrypted, or just run the encryption on the pack and decipher it without care if its encrypted already?

  IPSec do not care if the package is already encrypted. A case is ipsec in ipsec tunneling, where you would be tunnel log ipsec from your pc to a session ipsec server on a lan-to-lan (or site to site).

  The only thing that IPSec will rely on when he decided to protect/encrypt a package is if the source and dest are an interesting access list. So if the acl crypto says to allow ip net1 to net2 occurs, ipsec protection even if a previous router apply ipsec between on net1 host1 and host2 on net2.

• encryption of wireless data

  Is it possible to encrypt the data wirelessly between the hosts and access point? We use TTLS and PEAP and felt that ALL data when, through a secure tunnel, but it seems we are wrong and only authentication process goes through the tunnel. Somehow we can implement encryption? Thank you.

  Implement WPA or WPA2, it will encrypt ALL traffic data between AP & Client after authentication.

  Master encryption keys are unique to each client, to change for every package update on homelessness and group composition changes (IE, someone leaves / joined the AP)

  Currently, the safest way to implement WPA2-AES, WPA-TKIP is however still extremely secure (still not cracked up to the best of my knowledge) and has a broader support for older clients.

• difference between free WILL and IP tunnel

  Hello!!!

  I want to know when the tunnel is configured, what mode is more emotional in terms of encryption and cost less to generals.

  Thanks in advance

  Kiran

  Kiran,

  When we talk about encryption, or a GRE or IP tunnel will encrypt the traffic on their own. This process must be done using a second mechanism such as IPSec.

  Regarding less overhead, the GRE header is 24 bytes and an IP 20 byte header.

  When a GRE tunnel is generated, the original packet is encapsulated in a GRE (Protocol IP 47) package and send to the configured tunnel destination. Similarly, when using IP tunnels, the original packet must be sent is encapsulated in a new IP packet and sent to the destination of the tunnel. When you look at an IP packet with a Protocol Analyzer, the package will appear to have two headers IP it contains.

  Another thing to consider with types of two tunnels, a GRE tunnel has the opportunity to acknowledge the receipt of similar packets for TCP communication. The method of the IP tunnel has no such mechanism because it inherits the behavior without a based IP gross, similar to UDP communications package State.

  Steve

• Dbms_Crypto.encrypt

  Hi all

  I will encrypt and decrypt a particular value of number using "SHA-1 Message Authentication Code.

  I was planning to use dbms_crypto.encrypt using HMAC_SH1 users must use the same key for encryption and decryption, but seems using other key for decryption users were able to decrypt the passed string. What's wrong with the code below?

  The Oracle documentation reference: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28419/d_crypto.htm

  PLSQL Code:

  -------------------------------------------------------------

  DECLARE

  input_string VARCHAR2 (200): = '123456'.

  l_encrypt_key VARCHAR2 (2000): = '1215181167716155195232915411';

  l_decrypt_key VARCHAR2 (2000): = '1215181167716154262212312345';

  output_string VARCHAR2 (200);

  encrypted_raw RAW (2000);             -stores the encrypted binary text

  decrypted_raw RAW (2000);             -stores the decrypted binary text

  key_bytes_raw RAW (32);               -stores the encryption key

  encryption_type PLS_INTEGER: = encryption suite - type total encryption.

  DBMS_CRYPTO. HMAC_SH1 + DBMS_CRYPTO. CHAIN_CBC + DBMS_CRYPTO. PAD_PKCS5;

  BEGIN

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line ("original string: ' |") input_string);

  key_bytes_raw: = UTL_I18N. STRING_TO_RAW (l_encrypt_key, "AL32UTF8"); ---

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' key bytes Raw string: ' | key_bytes_raw);

  encrypted_raw: = DBMS_CRYPTO. ENCRYPT

  (

  SRC = > UTL_I18N. STRING_TO_RAW (input_string 'AL32UTF8'),

  Typ = > encryption_type,.

  key = > key_bytes_raw

  );

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' Raw encrypted string: ' | encrypted_raw);

  -The encrypted value 'encrypted_raw' can be used here

  key_bytes_raw: = UTL_I18N. STRING_TO_RAW (l_decrypt_key, "AL32UTF8"); ---

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' key bytes Raw string: ' | key_bytes_raw);

  decrypted_raw: = DBMS_CRYPTO. DECRYPT

  (

  SRC = > encrypted_raw,

  Typ = > encryption_type,.

  key = > key_bytes_raw

  );

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' Raw decrypted string: ' | decrypted_raw);

  output_string: = UTL_I18N. RAW_TO_CHAR (decrypted_raw, "AL32UTF8");

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' decoded string: ' | output_string);

  END;

  /

  Output:

  --------------------------------------

  Original string: 123456

  Key Raw bytes string: 31323135313831313637373136313535313935323332393135343131

  Encrypted raw string: 8F4B3B0F9FAA77D7

  Key Raw bytes string: 31323135313831313637373136313534323632323132333132333435

  Decrypted raw string: 313233343536

  Decrypted string: 123456

  There are a LOT of Oracle documentation with examples of use of encryption and hash. Here is one of them.

  Development of Applications using the encryption of data API - 11 g Release 2 (11.2)

  Example of AES 256 bits encryption and decryption of the procedures

  The following PL/SQL block shows how to encrypt and decrypt a predefined variable named input_string using the 256-bit AES with Cipher Block Chaining and #5 PKCS padding algorithm.

• Encryption of the columns and their corresponding indices

  I have a TDE on Oracle 11.2.0.2. I will encrypt the following tables:
  
  Table: APPS. ACCOUNTS
  Column: creditcard_num
  
  It is a primary key. There automatically indexes. If I encrypt the column, using the TDE column encryption, is the corresponding index automatically encrypted? Or should I encrypt the index as well?
  
  Table: APPS. SAVINGS
  Column: username
  Index: username_indx
  
  user name is not a primary key, but it has an index. If I encrypt the username column is the index encrypted as well.

  Hello

  the index will be automatically encrypted, beware that you must encrypt the column with NO salt
  and that a limitation resulting will be that you can no longer vary the scans, this means
  the credit card number only is located by its index if it is entirely known before, see:

  notes 454980.1 Encryption best practices for index encrypted columns using TDE column the.

  Tablespace encryption doesn't have this limitation,

  Greetings,

  Damage ten Monkshood

• Crypt Password Manager password already registered if it is set then?

  I had to give access to a another user root on my machine a few days ago and I have a lot of passwords saved without using a master password. I don't want this new user root to be able to copy my fx sqlite database and view them easily.
  When you set a new master password, passwords that have been already registered before you set this password master are encrypted using the new master password or should I delete all and add them manually?

  Greetings.

  Hello unreal4u, by setting a master password will encrypt the whole sqlite database and affect also all your stored passwords currently.

• FileVault2

  I have a small question about FileVault.  I have a Mac under El Capitan.  It has a SSD (currently the startup disk) and a HARD drive (for my documents and media).  Both are internal discs.  If I turn on FileVault, it will encrypt the DSS, as well as the HARD drive?  The documentation I've seen, he crypt just the only startup disk.  Is this correct or it allow you to choose?

  Thank you...

  I have my boot drive (one on a MacBook Air) and an external hard drive that is encrypted using FileVault. It was a two-step process - after that I encrypted the internal drive I encrypted then externally.

• Helps the FS7610 PS Series SAN, 10Gb network design

  Hi, we have currently a square of infrastructure EqualLogic SAN and NAS (2 x PS6510E, FS7500), a stack of two PC8024F 10 GB switches, 2 envelopes chassis m1000e blade with the A1 being a set of switches 1 GB m6220 fabric (fabric A2 a battery of the same thing), the tissue being a pile of m8024k B1 10 GB passes, (fabric B2 a battery of the same thing) and a stack of PC6224 two 1 GB (top of the grid GigE) switches.

  We all have this connected to the 10 GB being its own private network 10.1.0.x SAN network and vlan, nice and isolated from all the rest.  The blades can access the iSCSI shares via their network cards of 10 GB which is all on this network 10.1.0.x.  The NIC 1 GB on the blades are on a public network, and the FS7500 of the customer ports are on this network too via the 6224, so NFS connections are established via the public network to 1 GB.

  We intend to invest in an additional PS Series array to the host to a backup site, for replication.  At the same time, we plan to buy a FS7610 to our main site to take advantage of our 10 GB infrastructure and move the FS7500 existing to our backup site, so we can replicate iSCSI and NAS container volumes.

  That's where we could use some help, because now many things have changed.  Now, the SAN must be on the public network for replication to succeed, AND to take advantage of the connectivity of 10 GB and sharing NFS mount of the FS7610 through 10 Gbit, we need to use network cards 10 Gbit and switches in the network of the client NAS, that are already used for iSCSI traffic (and will in the future be used for connections to SAN vmware hypervisor).  In the FS7610 install and set up the guide, it says

  • Use the switches for network client and for the internal network and the SAN.
  • Use separate subnets for network client and for the internal network and the SAN.

  We can move the SAN and it is a dedicated subnet network and VLAN that is on the public network without problem, but my main concern is to be able to satisfy the recommendations/network configurations required for the FS7610 and avoid the local SAN/NAS traffic through a router to ensure connections of 10 GB.  Advice or tips are appreciated!

  It is the same thing that you are dealing with Linux, but TCP/IP standard routing.   You cannot route private subnets directly on the internet.  We need to create a "Wan".   Do not directly routed on the internet.

  Your WAN will create a private network and a tunnel over the Internet.   OpenVPN is a possible solution.

  A very widespread scenario might be:

  Once you have put WAN in place, on the internet of these routers would be a true internet address (e.g., 62.x.x.x.x) so the two WAN devices can communicate with each other.   They create a VPN tunnel with a new subnet, say 10.3.0.x.

  The WAN router primary side would have a leg on the subnet 10.1.0.x, say with 10.1.0.10 IP address as your default route on the side of EQL SAN 10.1.0.10.

  On the side of the DR this router would have a leg on the 10.2.0.x subnet, say 10.2.0.10.  The default GW on the side DR would be 10.2.0.10.   The router knows how to move packets between networks using the standard range.

  Looks like all you're missing is the "WAN" VPN tunnel between sites.  You want something that will encrypt traffic between the sites anyway.

  Who help me?

  Kind regards

• PAT on IPSEC VPN (Pix 501)

  Hello

  I work to connect a PIX 501 VPN for a 3rd party hub 3015. The hub requires all traffic to come from a single source IP address. This IP address is assigned to me as z.z.z.z. I have successfully built the VPN and tested by mapping staticly internal IP with the IP address assigned, but cannot get the orders right to do with PAT in order to have more than one computer on the subnet 10.x.x.0. This Pix is also a backup for internet routing and NAT work currently as well for this.

  I can redirect traffic to my subnet to the remote subnet via the VPN, but I can't seem to get the right stuff PAT to the VPN using the assigned IP address. If anyone can give me some advice that would be great.

  lines of current config interesting configuration with static mapping:

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 y.y.y.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 102 permit ip y.y.y.0 255.255.255.0 z.z.z.z host

  access-list 103 allow host ip y.y.y.0 255.255.255.0 z.z.z.z

  IP address outside w.w.w.1 255.255.255.248

  IP address inside 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) - 0 102 access list

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  public static z.z.z.z (Interior, exterior) 10.x.x.50 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 w.w.w.2 1

  correspondence address card crypto mymap 10 103

  mymap outside crypto map interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  Thank you!

  Dave

  Dave,

  (1) get rid of static electricity. Use more Global/NAT. The static method will create a permanent

  translation for your guests inside and they will always be this way natted. Use

  NAT of politics, on the contrary, as shown here:

  not static (inside, outside) z.z.z.z 10.x.x.50 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Global (outside) 2 z.z.z.z netmask 255.255.255.255

  (Inside) NAT 2-list of access 101

  (2) the statement, "nat (inside) access 0 2' list will prevent nat of your valuable traffic."

  Delete this because you need to nat 2 nat/global card. (as a general rule, simply you

  If you terminate VPN clients on your device and do not want inside the traffic which

  is intended for the vpn clients to be natted on the external interface).

  (3) with the instructions of Global/nat 2, all traffic destined for the remote network will be first

  translated into z.z.z.z. Then your card crypto using the ACL 103 will encrypt all traffic which

  sources of z.z.z.z for y.y.y.0 24. This translation wil happen only when traffic is destined for the vpn.

  I hope this helps. I have this work on many tunnels as you describe.

  Jamison

• VPN configuration to 150 + branches

  Hi all

  We are planing to have a new research report international 3845 at our headquarters and replace all connections of leased line VPN connections from the service provider. Currently, leased lines are finished in a set of interfaces for E1 3660.

  the service provider is to have a VPN - IP MPLS/BGP, so this will be a peer-2-peer VPN. Since we are a banking institution, we do not want to rely on VPN - L3 service providers.

  My question is, how do we achieve encryption of our new router to all branches and what will be the specific ideal IOS and FRIEND or VPN modules, we should have?

  Thank you

  uddika

  Sorry, I'm confused - you said on the original post

  "my question is, how do we achieve encryption of our new router to all branches and what will be the specific ideal IOS and FRIEND or VPN modules, we should have?"

  But you also said "the service provider is to have a VPN - IP MPLS/BGP, so this will be a peer-2-peer VPN." Since we are a banking institution, we do not want to rely on VPN - L3 service providers. "

  Just so I'm clear - your provider will encrypt the data of your through the MPLS cloud. And you're not happy with this - if you want to make your own encryption and then send it to your service provider? Essentially you want to encrypt him twice - is this correct?

• basic configuration question IPSec GRE

  

  the Sub test config has been entered at R1 (router left mostly). R4 has a similar to the inverse IP address config. R1 is able to ping R4 loopback at the present time.

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  life 120
  address of cisco crypto isakmp 203.115.34.4 keys
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set MY_TRANSFORM ah-sha-hmac esp - aes
  !
  MY_MAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined by peer 203.115.34.4
  game of transformation-MY_TRANSFORM
  match address 100
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface Loopback0
  192.168.10.1 IP address 255.255.255.255
  !
  interface Tunnel0
  IP 192.168.14.1 255.255.255.0
  source of tunnel Serial1/2
  tunnel destination 203.115.34.4
  card crypto MY_MAP

  !

  !
  interface Serial1/2
  IP 203.115.12.1 255.255.255.0
  series 0 restart delay
  !
  !
  Router eigrp 100
  network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  Auto-resume
  !
  router ospf 100
  router ID 1.1.1.1
  Log-adjacency-changes
  network 203.115.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
  !

  !

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect

  !

  !

  I see cisco samples configurations include an access list entry as follows...

  access-list 100 permit gre 203.115.12.1 host 203.115.34.4

  I understand the purpose of the ACL above regarding the test configuration that I posted here.

  Let me explain.

  LAN - router - WAN - router - LAN

  Communication between the two LANs can be on a GRE tunnel to an IPsec tunnel or IPsec/GRE tunnel.

  If you simply want to communicate between them unicast IP traffic, IPsec is recommended because it will encrypt the traffic.

  If you need non-unicast or non - IP traffic through, then you can create a GRE tunnel.

  If you want IPsec encryption for the GRE tunnel and then configure IPsec/GRE.

  The ACL you mention will not work because the GRE traffic is only between tunnel endpoints.

  The traffic that flows between local networks is the IP (not the GRE traffic) traffic where a permit GRE ACL will not work.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• BlackBerry Smartphones Media Card: What would my settings?

  I'm afraid I might have changed the setting 'factory' by accident.  Can someone tell me what they should be?

  Under the Support of the map, it has options such as the cipher Mode, mass storage Mode support... How should it be defined? Thank you.

  I recommend that you set the mass storage Support Yes

  It will allow you to access your blackberry when connected via USB as a usb flash drive.

  If you set the encryption mode WE will encrypt all the files on your memory card.

  If you don't store confidential data on micro-sd card - disable encryption.