What is checked first, GLBP or static route?

Similar Questions

• Explain SGE2000/P static routing (equal to L2 +)?

  L2 + mean?  I know these aren't L3 switches with IVR capabilities, then what is the purpose to configure static routes, if there is no functionality InterVLAN routing?

  T.I.A.,

  Chris

  Welcome to Cisco Community!

  With get them into a huge discussion, I will try to respond as quickly and directly as possible.

  Our EMS and EMS in the series switches are layer 3 switches (can also be configured as L2) so that they are able to operate as a (inter VLAN) router or gateway for all the VLANS. Once you have created the VLANS and assign an IP address, that IP address will become the GW for this VLAN. Under routing, you will not see any scholarly networks until what you assign the VLAN to a port and the port is enabled. You will then need to configure a default route to send traffic to the cloud. The router must belong to the same VLAN on the switch. So if the switch has an IP address of 172.16.30.1/24, the router will have an IP address of 172.16.30.254/24 for example. The road reads: next hop metric 172.16.30.254 0.0.0.0/0 2 (or higher).

  With respect to the static routes as a switch L2 or L3, that they would be useful when you have a device connected to another switch that is disjoint from your typical network of the local switch. In other words, let's say you have 3 (except default native VLAN 1) VLAN V10 - 30. Everything you devices belong to these VLANs, but you have a server on 30 VLAN that is not connected to this switch. You will then create a static route for the IP address of this server to the remote switch.

  VLAN30: 172.16.30.1 (local EMS)

  Server: 172.16.30.200 (on the remote switch)

  Remote switch: 192.168.20.1 (distance EMS)

  VLAN30: 172.16.30.2 (on the EMS distance)

  Static route:

  hop metric 172.16.30.2 next destination 172.16.30.200 2

  I hope that answers your question. These are really my favorite switches, because I find them very reliable and highly configurable. I love these things.

• When you use Excel or my Peachtree Accounting program, entered digital as "$152(32 in the accounting package or the same number with a square symbol as the decimal point in Excel.)". No idea what I should check first?

  When you use Excel or my Peachtree Accounting program, entered digital as "$152(32 in the accounting package or the same number with a square symbol as the decimal point in Excel.)".  No idea what I should check first?

  Thank you for visiting the website of Microsoft Windows Vista Community. The question you have posted is related to Office Excel and would be better suited to the office community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Office/Community/en-us/default.mspx?d=1

  Mike - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Static route / network Configuration?

  I have a cable modem that connects via Ethernet (eth0) of a configuration for NAT and Firewall Linux box.  Another card (eth1) connects to a switch for my cable network (192.168.1.1/24).  I added a third adapter (eth2 - 192.168.2.1/24) which is connected to a M20 (192.168.2.2).  The server DHCP M20 has been implemented to serve the 192.168.3.1/24 network.

  Is there a configuration more simple than that?

  Problems reported with the current configuration:

  (1) I think the M20 NAT function must be disabled because the Linux machine is.  However, disable NAT causes machines on 192.168.3 bad connection to the internet.

  (2) I want the machines wirelessly on 192.168.3 to see shared windows on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  Currently they do not see each other.  If I remove M20 and plug a PC eth2 and set as 192.168.2.2, this machine can see actions on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  I think a static route must be set on the M20 so that he knows what to do with traffic to 192.168.1.  However, I don't properly because he always tells me I have an invalid route when I try to enter.

  (3) is there one another device other than on the M20 motorway which would better suit my needs (adding a wireless to my private/internal network segment)?

  Kind regards

  Case No.

  OK, I just saw the previous thread on this question pop up on the first page,

  Valet parking can be defined as an access point only?

  I'll try the posted instructions here.

• Static routing question

  I just took a WRT610N and configure a few static routes for my network.

  I have the router connected to a cable modem WAN and the interface of local network connected to my LAN via 192.168.0.1.

  I have three other LAN subnets in a test environment, they are:-

  172.16.0.0/24

  172.16.100.0/24

  172.16.200.0/24

  I tried to add the following to the first subnet:

  Destination = 172.16.0.0 LAN IP address

  Subnet mask = 255.255.255.0

  Gateway = 172.16.0.1

  Interface = LAN

  No matter what I try, I get a message saying route static invalid, and I can't get anything to stick.  Everyone can't see what I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you guys!

  Gary

  The IP address of the gateway in a static route is the IP address of the connected device directly on each side of the router, either on the ethernet LAN or WAN side.

  In particular you cannot route a subnet of an IP address of the gateway inside the target IP subnet. The static route example you deposited directions where to send traffic destined to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0. It is impossible to set the address of the gateway as 172.16.0.1 because the router doesn't know where to send the traffic to 172.16.0.1.

  In other words, the IP address of the gateway must in most cases be a 192.168.0. * IP address that you use these IP addresses in the local network of the WRT. The IP address of the gateway should be the IP address of the router on the subnet specific target within your local network.

  For example, if your second router with address 172.16.0.1/255.255.255.0 IP LAN has an IP 192.168.0.2, then the 192.168.0.2 is the IP address of the gateway for the static route to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0.

• By default static route with recevied BGP default route

  Hi guys;

  I have a problem and I don't know how to find or solve it.

  My chart is attached, please check everything first.

  Secondly, I have a multihomed BGP with two Internet service providers, I received two ISPS via BGP default route.

  Now, I have two types of IP addresses as follows:

  1 - my own prifixes, who has recorded with my ACE

  2 - iPs purchased ISP2.

  I have two networks, the first will contain my own prefixes and second will contain my prifixes ISP2. so I have to go on the internet, static route by default to the ISP2 need and that's fine, now the problem that carry the second defect I received two ISPS in routing however my table if I show ip bgp I see that I received it, but because of favorite and distancing China he disappear the default road statistics.

  so now a network is already online and the second network that contain my own IPs is out of service, of course this second network I need to routed to my isps1 via bgp and when isps1 down, go through ISP2 and I do using weight and as path prefix.

  Thank you

  Hi Nathan,

  With ACB option, you config-route map is your own prefix and set its next hop ISP 1 and 2 PSI when ISP 1 IP is not accessible. Apply the road map to interface with Network1. ACB is processed before routing.

  With option VRF, put the Network1 interface and isps1 VRF1, so it will have separate routing table. Under the vrf1 you static default config with higher AD and the next hop pointing to ISP2 in the global routing table. This will be used when you lose by default isps1. Because separate ridges VRF table routing, so netwoek1 will use the default route in vrf1 to isps1 as primary, the Network2 use ISP2.

  HTH,
  Lei Tian

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Removing static route get % corresponding to any error no route to remove

  I'm trying to remove a static route, I added:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 #show ip route
  Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

  Gateway of last resort is not set

  172.168.0.0/29 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  S 172.168.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.2
  C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
  192.168.2.0/30 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
  R2 #conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  R2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
  % Corresponding to any no route to remove
  R2 (config) #r2 #show ip route

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I was training establishment of a static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1 (2600xm) via maps module T1 on the serial ports. connected to r1 is a router 2500 old called PC.

  I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 I connect to 2500 another console cable that I use to access a server I get the above error.  all IP addresses are just generic subnets that I created to play with static routing.   I can't remove someone has any ideas?

  you use the subnet mask different than the one you used. According to the route table entry mask is 29

  Try this,

  1] r2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.248 192.168.2.2

  or 2] another easy method would be to check the working config and copy stick with 'no' at the beginning.

  See the race | include the ip route

  Copy the static route statement and paste this what with 'no' in the global configuration and check the routing table.

• SG300-52. Prefer to send traffic to the default gateway rather than static route? Network stops if I disable ICMP redirects.

  I have 4 switches, each act as their own with a 26 subnet mask. They have static routes for every other switch. The firewall has a static route to each switch. If I unplug the LAN of the Firewall interface, traffic stops the flow of the switches. If I block the side LAN firewall, ICMP redirects, traffic stalls outside.

  So if you are connected to this switch, say that you pull an ip address of 192.168.122.20. Your front door is the 192.168.122.62 switch. If you try to access a server 192.168.127.142, the SG300 sends your traffic to 192.168.127.254 to get an ICMP redirect, rather than simply to communicate directly with 192.168.127.50.

  My network 'basic' is 192.168.127.0/24 vlan1 and the firewall is 192.168.127.254

  This is the route of one of my switches table (which has 192.168.122.0/26 and ports run on vlan122)

   Maximum Parallel Paths: 1 (1 after reset) IP Forwarding: enabled Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.127.254, 73:48:13, vlan 1 C 192.168.122.0/26 is directly connected, vlan 122 S 192.168.123.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.123, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.124.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.124, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.125.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.125, 73:48:14, vlan 1 C 192.168.127.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1 

  In any case, what gives? Why the switch would first try to send the stream to the firewall?

  EDIT: Here is the server routing table:

   [email protected]/* */:~$ ip route show default via 192.168.127.254 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/26 via 192.168.127.122 dev eth0 192.168.123.0/26 via 192.168.127.123 dev eth0 192.168.124.0/26 via 192.168.127.124 dev eth0 192.168.125.0/26 via 192.168.127.125 dev eth0 192.168.127.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.127.142 

  Hi Jonathan,.

  I'm sorry. I misunderstood the routing table you want to accomplish. Your concern seems relevant given that the matching rule more will be selected instead of one: page 275 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

  ... "When the routing of traffic, the next hop is decided based on the longest match on the prefix (LPM algorithm). A destination IPv4 address might match several routes in the IPv4 static routing Table. The device uses the matching route with the higher, subnet mask that is, the longest match on the prefix. "...

  So go ahead and report it to the support team so the guys can make the laboratory, confirm it and declare additional:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

  Kind regards

  Aleksandra

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• Connecting two routers via a static route

  I have a relatively simple configuration involving a Wireless-N Router and a wireless-B router (several years).  The N wireless router is connected to the internet (via DSL modem) and accepts several DHCP clients without problem.  Wireless - b router is connected to the Wireless-N router.  To do this, I connected the WAN port on the router wireless - b to a port on the router Wireless N ethernet (did not use the uplink). I have a PC connected to the router wireless - b, so I want him to be able to hit the internet, but also be accessible to DHCP clients on the Wireless N router.  The PC connects to the internet successfully, but it does not find clients on the network supported by the Wireless-N router.  It's about my setup:

  B 192.168.55.1 wireless router (LAN) 192.168.56.102 (WAN)

  PC 192.168.55.10 (active dhcp)

  Wireless N 192.168.56.1 (LAN) x.x.x.x (internet)

  (several clients dhcp... 192.168.56.100...)

  I've added a static route in the hope that a computer on the network of the Wireless N router would be able to hit the PC, but nothing helped. I've added a static route as such, on the Wireless-N router, which was the only way that that would enable the web interface:

  Destination LAN 192.168.55.0

  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0

  Gateway 192.168.56.102

  I tried to place the router without wireless - B gateway mode, then router and changed mode, then return.  I can connect to the web interface of the router wireless - b from the PC, and I can connect to the internet from the PC.  Also, the PC is able to reach customers on Wireless N, but the reverse is not true, i.e. clients on Wireless N can't find clients on the wireless - B network. Also, I turned on the port forwarding on the router wireless - B so that it points to the PC, in the hope he would lead all traffic to the PC, but still cannot access PC.  How to configure both routers (or both set up as access point?) so that clients on the Wireless N Router can talk to customers on the wireless router - B?  For now, all customers are on DHCP, but finally, I would like to create static entries for at least two or three of them.

  Thanks in advance

  Are Linksys routers teas? If so what model is router B? It may not supported for a DHCP client port forwarding. Even if you can get the port forwarding to work for a client on router B, it will not work for several clients.

  In addition, if you have the option in router B, disable the SPI Firewall. It is the cause of the problem, in my opinion. If you do this, you should port forward.

  Is there a reason that you connect the routers via the WAN port on the router B? You could uplink using an ethernet port on the B to an ethernet port on the N and avoid all this... You can always configure router B as a point of wireless access for specific customers.

• Subinterface-vlan-static route

  I tried the static route to the network 192.168.0.0/29 and 192.168.0.8/29. The result is PC1 still does not see PC3

  request: PC1 ping PC3 successful /vlan2

  photo here:

  Hello levantriet2881,

  I'm confused as to what you're asking.  On what router you add static routes, and what looked like the roads?  PC1 is unable to ping PC3?  But can ping to PC2?  Ping PC3 PC2 does What look like on each router's routing tables?  What is the configuration of uplink on the switch port look like?  Certainly need more information levantriet2881.

• Followed by static route ASA

  We have implemented this feature on four of our ASA5510s who have several ISPS attached.  It works fine, but I would like some details on the inner workings of this feature.  When I set the number of packets to 3 and the frequency at 20, causing the route be detected as failed?  Does detect three consecutive missed echoes and fail on the fourth missed package?  If she loses three, then sees echoes for the next, dows road stand?  Is the number of packets as a counter ' down/up', which means that success after breakdowns made the availability of County zero to three?  What is the time between the echo packets sent?  How dows the ASA begin to use the route taken after it's available again?  That actually mean the part "rtr" of the command?  I dug deep into Cisco and other resources online for several days, but have not found answers to these questions.  If there are documents available that answer my questions, provide links.  Thank you!

  To answer your question if 3 echos fail then the ASA mark the road as having failed and uses it. Now he keeps ping well and if he sees a response from the main road he scored again as functional and use it.

  The sssociates part of rtr a static route on track with the SLA monitoring process. The track ID corresponds to ID track given the static route to monitor: "rtr" = entry delay response time. 123 is the ID of the SLA process defined above.

  I hope it answers your question.

  PK

• Static route of VPN in EIGRP redistribution (FD is Inaccessible)

  Hi all

  I redistribute the site to site VPN static route in EIGRP, but what I noticed on the 6509 when I sh ip eigrp 200 topol, the static route to the ASA "FD is inaccessible."

  6509 output:

  Topology EIGRP-IPv4 for AS(200)/ID(10.33.95.34 table)

  Code: P - passive, A - Active, U - update, Q - Query, R - reply,.

  r response status, s - AIS status

  P 199.x.x.240/28, successors 1, FD 53760, tag is 36539

  through reallocation (53760/0)

  P 10.64.129.0/24, successors 1, FD is 28416

  Via 10.210.98.200 (28416/28160), Vlan98

  P 10.1.2.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible

  Via 10.210.98.200 (28416/28160), Vlan98

  P 10.210.98.0/24, successors 1, FD is 2816

  Via connected, Vlan98

  ASA5510 output:

  Topology EIGRP-IPv4 for AS(200)/ID(10.64.129.253 table)

  Code: P - passive, A - Active, U - update, Q - Query, R - reply,.

  r response status, s - AIS status

  P 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via Rstatic (28160/0)

  P 10.64.129.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via connected, Ethernet0/0

  P 199.x.x.240 255.255.255.240, successors 1, FD 79360, tag is 36539

  Via 10.210.98.254 (79360/53760), Ethernet0/1

  P 10.210.98.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via connected, Ethernet0/1

  The ASA config:

  200SW_EIGRP list standard access allowed 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0

  permissible static in eigrp route map 10

  200SW_EIGR match ip address

  Router eigrp 200

  redistribute static static in eigrp route map

  external route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 x.x.x.

  Thank you

  Thomas,

  When the flight director is not accessible in the EIGRP topology table, the router does not use this EIGRP route in its routing table.

  Probably, the road is overridden by any other routing protocol that has the lowest administrative distance.

  Could you please share the routing table?

  Thank you.

• I decided to change to a fixed IP address, but I was told to check first our intruder devices

  original title * search for the intruder

  Hello, in the last month, we have every time new problems of sending e-mails with attachments, particularly to the Hotmail and G-mail accounts. The emails simply cannot, without any error message. Reason is that I think that we are on the blacklist every time again. I decided to change to a fixed IP address, but I was told to check first our intruder devices that can use our computers. My question is: How can I do this?

  Hi HelenPeterse,

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  Are you still facing the question to send Emails?

  1) go to your user accounts and see if there is all unknown accounts that are administrator. If so, delete the accounts. Make sure that you have an administrator account that you created and change the password if you are the only person who knows the password.
  Then, remove all the accounts that you are not familiar with or don't want on your computer. Do not remove a network Service or Local Service account.
  Do not delete the account administrator, or system or comments. However, you can disable the guest account.

  (2) change your passwords every day until you know you're is more compromised.

  (3) right click on the taskbar and open the tasks to the top manager. Go to the users tab. There you can see if there are other users logged on to your computer. If you are not familiar with users, select the account and disconnect the user.

  (4) get your computer course before you go out on the internet. Only to connect to the internet when necessary. You can disable your router if you are not on your computer.
  If you use wireless, make sure that you use the most secure authentication type.
  Change the passwords on routers as most ships with a password. Change the router password so that no one else has the password. Check with the documentation for the router on how to change your password.

  Hope this information helps and if you have interviewed more associated with Windows do not hesitate to post on Microsoft Community we will be happy to help you.

• Static routing

  Hello

  I'm trying to set up a NSX environment using the static routes. As I am not a network expert, I need help here. Let me describe my environment:

  -NSX 6.2.1 is installed

  -DLR one is deployed and a logical switch is created. 172.16.10.0/24 is assigned to the logical switch and a few virtual machines are running.

  -One ESG is deployed. The GSS and the DLR are connected a logical switch in Transit and on the static route is added between the two.

  -The GSS was uplinked to the outside world via External-vDS and having 192.168.10.10 as IP uplink

  Now, the problem is that I can't reach the virtual computers in the VXLAN (172.16.10.0/24) from external computers.

  I have to add a static route on the device Physics (Cisco router) (route ip 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.10)?

  If it is not needed, what I have to do this work?

  I really appreciate your answers.

  Thank you

  You'll want to make sure that traffic destined to the networks behind the GSS is correctly routed through the physical network in the overlay.  One way to do would be to use a static route as you had mentioned to the physical router.  Once in place, the GSS would need a static route to send traffic for 172.16.10.0/24 network to the DLR.  The DLR would need a default route, which would point to the internal GSS interface, while the GSS would have a default route pointing to the physical router.