who called me

Similar Questions

• Re: File 4639436023 number - we have a Laserjet CP4025DN printer that doesn't work. Who call upon us

  We have a Laserjet CP4025DN printer that doesn't work. Who call us.  We are located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  The screenshot is empty and is not communiating with our computers.

  Here's the phone # for 1-(800)-474-6836 Canada

• Who calls the trigger?

  I need to identify a trigger (before deletion) who called him.
  What has been the users module and which executed sql commands.
  
  I tried the following:
  
  Select sysdate, b.MACHINE | '-' || b.OSUSER | '-' || b.MODULE | '-' || b.UserName | '-' || b.Program,
  a.SQL_TEXT
  v $ SQLTEXT,
  V$ SESSION b
  where a.SQL_ID = b.sql_id
  and select = sys_context ('USERENV', 'SID')
  and status = 'ACTIVE '.
  and UPPER (username) = "DOURADOS ';
  
  But I was just in the session of $ very exclusive v.

  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:382218730166

• Who called my stored procedure on a database connection?

  I have two instances of Oracle (ORCLA and ORCLB). ORCLB has a database of public link an ORCLA schema. This scheme has a package. Users in ORCLB need to call procedures in this package. Currently, they spend their name to the package through settings in these procedures.
  
  Passing the username as a parameter makes it somewhat easy to usurp the username. I prefer to get the user name from the context of the application or the call trace service. I was not able to do, and much of what I read leads me to believe that it is impossible. Indeed, it is impossible for a procedure called via a database link to know who called him?

  Phil Singer wrote:
  I have two instances of Oracle (ORCLA and ORCLB). ORCLB has a database of public link an ORCLA schema. This scheme has a package. Users in ORCLB need to call procedures in this package. Currently, they spend their name to the package through settings in these procedures.

  Passing the username as a parameter makes it somewhat easy to usurp the username. I prefer to get the user name from the context of the application or the call trace service. I was not able to do, and much of what I read leads me to believe that it is impossible. Indeed, it is impossible for a procedure called via a database link to know who called him?

  He is always Oracle client-server basis. And the same problem exists with all client connections (not db-link) to Oracle.

  The client opens a connection to the database using an Oracle username and password (ignoring the other authentication methods at the moment). The customer has an Oracle Server session that is service.

  The customer now calls a PL/SQL procedure. How this procedure will know who the user actually o/s on the client? Essentially the same question that you ask when the customer is a link database.

  The PL/SQL procedure does not know. The Oracle server does not either. The customer must provide these data.

  In the case of a standard client connection, the client makes. With the kind permission of the client driver, the connection string used to connect to the database includes the executable name of the program that performs the connection, the name of the client operating system user, the process ID of the client process on the client platform and so on. (these data can be accessed via views$ v).

  However, the client driver provide these data. Thus, the data can be tampered with. And for this reason, the data must be considered as a suspect, and not for reasons of security (access control).

  Your problem is no different. You, on the Oracle server, cannot determine the "o/s' (remote Oracle user) user who initiates the db-link connection.

  You must therefore provide which specifies that the client. And he may decide to usurp it. Which means that your only reliable thing is to protect your code/tables via an Oracle schema user name and the password that the client should use to open a session. And that's what it takes to put the main emphasis on your layer of security.

• I keep getting phone calls from a man who calls himself from Windows saying: I have a virus and to pay to get rid of him!

  • This man said that it comes from windows and I have a virus and you have to pay to remove! I know it's a lie and paid no attention, but I expect some vulnerable people might do! How can I report to microsoft? Has anyone actually paid these merchant scam?
  Thank you for getting back on this type of scam.
  Yes, some vulnerable people indeed caught up.

  Microsoft has none of the unsolicited telephone calls to help you fix your computer

  In this type of scam cybercriminals are calling you and claim to be of Support technique Microsoft. They offer help with your computer problems. Once scammers have earned your trust, they try to steal and damage your computer with malicious software, including viruses and spyware.

  Although the law enforcement can trace phone numbers, often authors use pay telephones, disposable cell phones or stolen cellular phone numbers. It is better to avoid being scammed rather than try to repair the damage afterwards.

  Treat all unsolicited sceptically telephone calls. Don't provide personal information.

  If you receive an unsolicited call from someone who claims to be from Technical Support Microsoft, hang up. We do not have such calls.

  If you think you might be a victim of fraud, you can report it.

  For more information, see: what to do if you think you have been scammed...

  Read more: avoid scams that use the Microsoft name fraudulently

• Who called me? And how should I call back?

  I have a simple question, but in my attempt to run before I walked entirely, I missed a step and fell.

  I have created a dialog box that contains the features that I need in my application, so I stripped everything from the element from the dialog box and placed in a class outside default package. I now need to be able to update things on the component from the class, what is the best approach to this? How can I separate the design of the feature?

  I can add event listeners to the component to listen for events generated by the class, but how would I do something like update a bar progression on a form?

  I guess the question of outerim is: How does the class know who he instantiated?

  Thanks for any help,

  Paul

  Hello

  You can always pass an instance of a property of a class.

  Suppose you have a class MyClass with a public "owner" property, then within a component, you could do something like:

  ...

  public var classInst:MyClass;

  private function buttonClickOrSomething (): void

  {

  classInst = new MyClass();

  classInst.owner = this;

  classInst.someMethod ();

  }

  Of course, the intelligent use of event listeners and the event is always preferable.

  The general idea of decoupling design of features is to use a kind of pattern mvc (model, view, controller).

  The model, which, in most cases, is a singleton class, keeps track of the accurate data (such as data from a server) and update properties. It also dispatches events. These models don't know anything about the components in your application.

  Now, the views, which are custom components use two main things to update themselves:

  -Event listeners

  -Data binding

  A very simple example is that you have a class called singelton GlobalData who has a userName property.

  Now, if you have a custom label configured like this component:

  the label will be updated automatically when the userName property is changed. Another element could change the GlobalData userName property and all components 'related' will update automatically!

  Hope this helps

  Dany

• the number who call this number 970-210-3550

  can I get the number call my wife phonoe 970-210-3550

  Hello

  It there a call saying they were from Microsoft?

  ===========

  Yes, it's a SCAM!

  The number is usurped or forwarded to another number, perhaps another country.

  970-210-3550.
  http://www.numberinvestigator.com/phone/970-210-3550.html

  ========================

  Avoid scams to phone for tech support
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspx

  Scams by e-mail or web: how to protect yourself - understands what to do if you
  think you've been scammed.
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/phishing-scams.aspx

  How to recognize phishing e-mails, phone calls or links
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/phishing-symptoms.aspx

  In the United States, you can contact the FBI, Attorney general, the police authorities and consumer
  Watch groups. Arm yourself with knowledge.

  The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation
  (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), funded in part by the Bureau of Justice Assistance
  (BJA).
  http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

  No, Microsoft wouldn't you not solicited. Or they would know if errors exist on your
  computer. So that's the fraud or scams to get your money or worse to steal your identity.

  Avoid scams that use the Microsoft name fraudulently - Microsoft is not unsolicited
  phone calls to help you fix your computer
  http://www.Microsoft.com/protect/fraud/phishing/msName.aspx

  Scams and hoaxes
  http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/cu_sc_virsec_master?ws=support#tab3

  Microsoft Support Center consumer
  https://consumersecuritysupport.Microsoft.com/default.aspx?altbrand=true&SD=GN&ln=en-us&St=1&wfxredirect=1&gssnb=1

  Microsoft technical support
  http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support#TAB0

  Microsoft - contact technical support
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/contact-support

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle=""><- mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• Microsoft has people who call and say there is a $100.00 refund either tire when you bought your computer. ?

  I get calls all the time, I think foreign countries that their language is difficult to understand that he wanted me to sign on the internet and put in www.support.we

  I know it's a scam... I'm sure...

  Microsoft never call unsolicited users. Simply hang up.

• Help connect to a return address listfield on-screen who called it with the selected data.

  
  

  "I'm ashamed to say.

  No need to be ashamed, why reinvent the wheel?

  A way I use to transmit back data is as follows:

  getAddressContacts extractScreen = new getAddressContacts();

  UiApplication.getUiApplication () .pushModalScreen (extractScreen (;)

  Contact extractedContact = extractScreen.getExtractedContact ();

  To use it, you add a getExtractedContact method to the screen of your getAddressContacts and make sure that it can return the contact of the extract.

  Make sense?

  Note: In the original post, the pushModalScreen was hurt just a pushScreen.  This note fixed to help future readers, intended to reduce confusion for anyone who reads on.

• Client listeners who call Server on fields only listeners take account of changes made on the event field

  Hello

  I have this sample application:

  1. I have a view object with a view criteria added to my data model of the app module.
  2. Then, in a page fragment /, I created a table based on this view object, and drag-and - drop operation ExecuteWithParam binds variables to the page as input fields of text with clientComponent = 'true '.
  3. Next, I added a listener client in each of the fields of type keyPress entry to call the following JavaScript method whenever the user presses the Enter key:

  function handleEnterEvent(evt) {
                        var _keyCode = evt.getKeyCode();
                        //check for Enter Key
                        if (_keyCode == AdfKeyStroke.ENTER_KEY ){
                            var comp = evt.getSource();
                            AdfCustomEvent.queue(comp, "EnterEvent", {}, false);
                            evt.cancel();
                        }
                     }
  

  4. then I added a server listener to these same "EnterEvent" type text input fields to call a method in my grain of support, that basically runs the OperationBinding ExecuteWithParam programmatically.

  The problem:

  1. I type "123" in my it1 text entry field and press the Enter key. The operation is performed and the results of the table are filtered as expected with the view criteria.
  2. I then clear the value in my it1, change the cursor in my it2 of text entry (without pressing enter), type 'Hello' and press the Enter key. The operation is performed, but the results are incorrect - the results indicate values as if the value "123" was always filled the it1 (and respective value of binding).
  3. If I do the cursor resume my cleared it1 text input and press the Enter button, the results are now correct...

  It's like bind values are updated only when the client event is triggered in this specific field... How should it be properly implemented? What Miss me?

  Thanks in advance. Kind regards

  -Tiago Vidigal

  Try to set autoSubmit = "true" for the text input element

  Timo

• SubVis computer - which is compiled by calling Vi and who are not

  I have a request in which a compiled exe dynamically load a Subvi (sub-VI-A).

  The Subvi then statically calls a Subvi (sub-VI-B) who calls statically another Subvi (sub-VI-C)...

  All the SubVis are part of a source distribution is copied on the remote computer with the executable file.

  If I change the Sub-VI-A or sub-VI-B on the remote machine, I see these changes when sub-VI-A is called.

  However, the changes in the Sub-VI-C (on the remote machine) are never seen when sub-VI-A, B... are executed.

  In fact, I can delete sub-VI-C on the remote computer without any problem.

  However, if I delete sub-VI-B, sub-VI-A raise an error because it cannot find slot-VI-B.

  I'm completely confused.   Why is sub-VI-C compiled in sub-VI-B, but sub-VI-B is not compiled into the Sub-VI-A?

  Sub-VI-C is also used within the executable itself?

• I called the support 855-346-5768. They are demanding $ to release my computer to me...

  I tried to get support on the Mozilla site. As I got on the site, I received an article that said there were many problems with the latest version of Firefox and I should call Mozilla at 855-346-5768. I did and these people who call themselves computer Tech support, certified system engineers took control of my computer and declared that there are repairs to my system and the cost is $ 99. I refused to give them any money, but they won't get out my computer to me. Jeff Vanskike

  _{Edit: removed personal information for your protection. Please note that we cannot offer support by telephone, so please continue in the forum. Thank you for your understanding! (philipp)}

  Hello Jeff, mozilla does provide no phone support - our official support to support.mozilla.org site and provides a knowledge base and Forum. Here, we will never charge you any assistance request or recommend additional paid services.

  the line you mentioned is not related to mozilla in some way, if unfortunately that we won't be able to help you with any dispute you may have with them. If you think they're mischarging or failing to get out of your computer, you could notify your local trading standards authorities.
  In addition, if this company falsely refers to the brand "Mozilla" to provide or to advertise their services, you may report it to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/legal/fraud-report/ so that more can take action against them.

  Sorry for all the evils!

• Why wouldn't I be able to hear my calls

  iPhone 5 and I am unable to hear from people who call me talk.  They can hear me very well.  If I plug my earbuds I hear them then. What is the problem

  the Lake judyfromfond wrote:

  iPhone 5 and I am unable to hear from people who call me talk.  They can hear me very well.  If I plug my earbuds I hear them then. What is the problem

  Hi judyfromfond of the Lake

  I understand that you are having problems with the inability to hear people talking. I want to assure you that I will do my personal best, I can so we can hopefully work this problem then you can start using your iPhone again as usual.

  Please follow these steps. After each step, see if you're still having problems. If you are not the issues more, you can stop there, if not continue filling all the steps until you finish all. After trying these steps and you still seem to be having problems please post back here and we'll discuss other measures we can try.

  I also want to note for you that if only one person, or only several people can't hear you, I recommend reference you this article of support for them: If you can not hear a person on an appeal or a voice message or if the sound is not clear on your iPhone - Apple in charge. Once they have followed all the steps in there, and they can't always hear you so presumably that the problem may be on the iPhone itself.

  • Step 1: restart your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support
  • Step 2: find the version of the software on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support
    • If you are not running the latest version of the software, you must update your iOS Device: update the iOS on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support software

  This Apple support article should also contribute to: If you hear no sound or distorted sound of your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch speaker - Apple supported

  Hope this helps,

  John

• I allow calls from verified contacts, but still receive unwanted calls

  in do not distrub, I allow calls from verified contacts, but always receive unwanted calls, I even got a call with my name in the caller ID!

  If you allow calls repeated under tension, then the telemarketers or who calls you are probably recall several times. As for the one with your name in the caller ID, I am one of those who earlier. Turns out be a telemarketing touting T-Mobile robot. I was incredibly ticked. So I got my carrier on the phone a few minutes asking them to open a trace. These calls are illegal.

  The foam of telemark will stop at nothing in their attempts to get through you.

• Not crossing on Windows Phone 8.1 Skype calls

  Hello everyone, I have a Skype number and go on a trip to Europe. My wifi works and I can send an email, make calls via Skype, etc. I can't incoming calls. I get emails telling me that I missed a call and the people who call me, then me text and say that my phone number is going to voicemail. I already uninstalled the app and reinstalled Skype support. It did not work. Don't know what to try next. It worked when I was in the United States - I tested it by call from another line. Regards, Rob

  Found the answer on my own. After the support of four hours on the phone with Skype and Nokia, I found an obscure post who spoke to change the program that is allowed to view the details of notifications on the lock screen. I did once all call me came by when the phone is locked. Skype support had no idea and wanted that I reset my Nokia phone. To solve the problem the problem go to settings - Notifications and Skype as the program which can shoe and particulars under Notifications.