Why an asynchronous call would lead to "the VI is not executable. The full development version... »

Similar Questions

• Why install adobe muse in install me the desktop CC version MUSE and installed on my laptop as mu profit 2015 is not open my laptop sites created on the desktop and vice versa

  Why install adobe muse in install me the desktop CC version MUSE and installed on my laptop as mu profit 2015 is not open my laptop sites created on the desktop and vice versa

  You must use the same version of Muse on the two computers.

  Don't forget that both computers running a 64-bit operating system to ensure you have the latest versions on both computers.

• Asynchronous call still slow down the main VI

  Hello!

  I currently have a 'main VI' quick process underway, and I have a Subvi, which is essentially a device data collection. However, this Subvi works at 1 Hz, while my main VI runs a lot faster.

  I created an asynchronous call to the Subvi and set it such that the hand is not expected to incoming data. I followed these very simple instructions: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361L-01/lvhowto/acbr_call_and_forget/

  However, when I run the present, my main VI is as slow as if I did not use an asynchronous call. For your information, the only node inside my main while loop is the node "Start Asynchronous Call.

  Is there something I'm missing about how works this Subvi without slowing down my main VI?

  Thank you very much!

  I guess that your main problem is that the DLL calls are set to run in the user interface thread.  This could prevent your main VI to update until the end of this call to the DLL.  Try to set their 'Run in any thread.

  In addition, there is no need keep saying this VI to run over and over again.  He needs is called only once.

• How can I convert OEM to the full retail version in Win7?

  Hello

  I have an OEM of Win7 version and I would like to convert it to a full commercial version of it for support. How can I do?

  Just buy a product key for the version the retail edition of Windows 7, you have now installed. You can use either a full retail version or upgrade of the key (do NOT use a key to upgrade Express).

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/buy/default.aspx
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/get-a-new-Windows-product-key

  Click Start, right click on computer
  Click on properties
  Scroll down to the Windows Activation
  Click on the link 'change your product key '.
  Enter the new product key and follow the wizard screen to turn on

• Core of labview 8.5.1 installed DVD (PDS) and I have the full development on my system?

  Hello everyone,

  I do not understand this self of that happening. I had labview 8.5 full development install on my computer, but I have seen that this version of labview did not support the creation of executable.

  So I uninstalled this version to install LabVIEW 8.5.1 a DVD named or SITE LICENSE version ACADEMIC (spring 2008) and not the documentation provided sti ^ pule it as well of the professional development system version.

  Once you have installed this version, the computer offer me an activation already number that does not exist on my computer pour activate LabVIEW.

  I then run LabVIEW and I realize that the version I have installed is none other that the full version of system development.

  Y ' there something I forgot when installing?

  Good to you

  Edward

  English, c/o Google translation:

  Hi all

  I don't understand what is happening. LabVIEW 8.5 full development, I have installed on my computer, but I have seen that this version of LabVIEW does not support the creation of the executable file.

  So I uninstalled this version to install the LabVIEW 8.5.1 on a DVD named OR LICENSE SITE ACADEMIC (spring 2008) and that the documentation provided sti ^ pule is indeed the version professional development system.

  Once you have installed this version, it offers me a number of activation on my existing computer to activate LabVIEW.

  I run LabVIEW and then I realize that the version I have installed is different from the development of the full system.

  Is there something I forgot when installing?

  Sincerely,

  Full development edition does not include the Application Builder. It is explained in the LabVIEW product information. You can buy the Application Builder separately, or use the professional edition.

  You said that you have the professional edition on the DVD you have, if you have installed that. But you said that the version you have installed is 'different' in full. What do you mean by 'different '? Have you checked the LabVIEW development environment and the Application Builder have been activated? You can check by looking in the License Manager, OR (which is installed with the software).

• problems with the replacement of the trial with the full released version

  So invited a new Member of the team and the members is now showing as active. Downloaded as required but the message of the trial has not disappeared and it does not appear that the fully released version has updated correctly / replaced the trial.

  Are passed through the same thing with another Member of the team and everything worked well.

  What is going on?

  Hi Ewa,

  Please see this document to activate it:

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/sign-in-out-activate-apps.html

  Let us know if that helps.

  Concerning

  Megha Rawat

• Why can't I connect to install the Indesign Trial Version?

  I created an Adobe account, loggied and downloaded the trial version of Indesign, however, when I tried to install it, the system kept saying my user ID (email address) and password do not correspond exactly, although I was able to sign before. I clicked on the problem with the signature in link and entered my e-mail address. The system is then told that the e-mail address was not valid. So I tried to use a different e-mail address to create a new account, but the system says that the new e-mail address already exists. What should I do?

  Hi sz9688,

  Please reset the password of your Adobe ID and then try to login and check.

• Start the asynchronous call brutal Typedef Bug

  There is a nasty bug which I think is the cause of many anomalies weird I see with the events of the user, like where some get fired and if I probe the refnum of the event on a VI that was launched using the asynchronous call node start I get some weird value for reference as 8450 or 5500 instead of some great typical integer. It is not also match the value that I get when I initialize the reference. This happens only intermittently, but I can reproduce the bug that I see on a smaller scale to a certain extent. This is not exactly the same as what I see in my current project, but I guarantee you both are related. Also, I'm pretty confident that this has to do with the help of LVlibs as well.

  So... to reproduce some questions:

  Unzip the attached code and open the project

  Open Main.vi. It is hard to see because it's pink, but notice the point of constraint on the node to call asynchronous start. This is provided at this point because I have a cluster of non-typedef in the connector pane, but a TD cluster plugged into it.

  Now open AsyncCall.vi

  Drag the eventcluster.ctl of the project on the façade of the asynccall.vi

  CTRL + x on the typedef cluster that has placed you on the front panel

  Select the non-typedef cluster by clicking it

  CTRL + v to replace the TD not cluster with the cluster of TD and save

  Return to main.vi, you will notice that the point of constraint does not go far.

  Open context-sensitive help and notice that the ctrl types match, but it's as if LV does not recognize it on the beginning of the node of the asynchronous call.

  Remove the node from asynchronous start call, then replace it. The cluster to the top wire. Voila, no point of constraint.

  Second question - same result but different method to get there.

  Now that you have components of connector typedef stress points and no more because you've taken the first steps of this 'exercise', remove the EventCluster.ctl from the library and record.

  WOAH, look the points of back strain, because node call asynchronous start still referencing the typedef cluster that he thinks that should be in the library. This can be seen by removing the cluster on main.vi and then right-click on the node to call asynchronous start on the side of the connector and creating a new constant of cluster

  It is creates a greyed out of control! Why? Well, we will reopen the context-sensitive help. Whadda you know, it's always looking for the control in Bug.lvlib that no longer exists.

  Now, the question that I'll have in my complete project that I can't post and can not reproduce on a smaller scale updates the typedef causes the dot of coercion. Otherwise I can't update my typedef cluster that contains all my events without going and replacing EVERY SINGLE launch async call node EVERY time I have add a new event.

  Major problem.

  Please let me know if these steps to reproduce were not clear or you have difficulties to reproduce the problem. I use LV2013 SP1. I opened the project in 2014 to see if it has been fixed in a later version, but I saw the same thing.

  I can repro with measurements of @GregFreeman and also confirm that I saw this same issue at least since the LV2012, but they have not reported it having not been able to provide a minimum test (thanks, @GregFreeman!) scenario

  For the record, it seems that the bug here, it is the spread of type sometimes makes an incorrect assumption / optimization as to if the conpane of the start the asynchronous call node must be updated when the source changes.

  A more obvious change - say, add/remove an entry, reverse order, or change data types altogether - always seems to spread properly.

  Incorrect optimization seems to be a terminal retains the same type of database, but transforms the type definitions - or, if the type definition is re-related or related outside a library owner.

  @GregFreeman watch the bug goes from non-typedef typedef, but it's actually worse in the other direction - when a link to a missing file is maintained.

  Call the asynchronous starting node seems to maintain a list of links that is distinct from that of the VI, and this list of links separated, this is what seems to not be properly invalidated. For example, in the screenshot, I illustrated example of Greg that the node generates no error in the compiler even after parenthood and rename the Typedef...

  

  ... even when we "Create Constant" on this terminal incriminated with list obsolete links, we get a compilation error. Since then, the grayed out type highlighted in the contextual help cannot be found, because 'Bug.lvlib:EventCluster.ctl' no longer exists, but the list of links separated from this node was not notified:

  

  It is worth noting that "Bug.lvlib:EventCluster.ctl" does not appear in the list of links of the VI at this stage.

  Often, no compiler error is generated after this failure occurs and as Greg reports, you could end up with undefined behavior (e.g. suspicious Refnums and events that seem to not fire not) (and I'll add it to this list a hearty portion of DAborts with diversion total number of messages).

  In addition, you * could * receive errors of cryptic linker for generations, but maybe not (the above screenshot, you'll notice I added two builds, neither of which seems to have a problem of building). (It seems that the broken link is travel with the distribution of the source, even if 'Disconnect the definitions of Type' is selected during the build process. That is why I believe anecdotally that node maintains a list of link separately the list of VI, and it's maybe part of the problem).

  It is noted that during this refactor (de-parent and rename) all screws and control remained open and in memory and all files have been saved. No funny business where LabVIEW would be unable to update links in a file that was not in memory.

  Another note - in the original example, all source files have been unifiles, and I can add anecdotal report this bug is much more insidious when separate compiled Code is active on the source files. In this case, the source may appear to be perfect - no point of constraint, no link expired - but the code that is currently running can be broken. In other words, what you see is not what you get, which makes debugging impossible. (This bug in particular is one of the few who makes "Cache of compiled clear objects" become a normal procedure controlled throughout the application development)

  Anyway, I wanted to draw attention to this issue, given that this thread is not yet associated with a CAR and it's a serious bug that generates a behavior undefined performance caused by a fairly normal refactor now has a well-characterized small repro case.

• How do I know if a VI is already running before calling Start Asynchronous Call?

  The new node to start the asynchronous call is great for the spawning of several instances of the reentrant vis.  However, I fell a little bit using for screws not reentrant the old practice of using the method "Run a VI" would allow us to check the Execution.State of the VI before calling the method to execute.  This way if the State was running or running at a higher level, we could spend the invoke node and just use a property node to open the front panel.  With the starting node the asynchronous call, it seems that we must use a strictly typed static VI reference, and when we open the reference VI, VI gets booked and his Execution.State = running.  So, how whether it is not only reserved by wire, but actually running before calling Start redundant?

  Moreover, the redundant beginning has an interesting behavior.  Actually, it will cause the targeted VI must be performed again after it stops.  Even if you tap the Abort button on the target VI, it run immediately still and always the same number of times as the starting node the asynchronous call is executed.  There is nothing wrong with that, and I guess the simple answer is to simply go back to the old method of "run a VI.  It's just that ability over these inputs directly to the connector pane is so nice.  Maybe missing me something obvious.  Oh, I am referring to the call and forget mode (0x80).

  Thank you

  Dan

  Maybe missing me something obvious.  Oh, I am referring to the call and forget mode (0x80).

  Yes you have forgotten that he forgets the Run method always seems to be a better choice for this mode

• Using asynchronous calls in a while loop. How 'Skip' node and only retrieve data as it is treated

  Maybe I'm not understand asynchronous calls... but I thought I should be able to call one another VI and essentially 'jump' it is the node and only receive data as the called VI treats.  In other words, similar to the Run of VI, I can wire a wait until done? with a fake and the main VI will not wait for the other VI end of race.  The main VI continues to function, and when it passes the called node of the VI, it will receive data if it happens to be there.

  How can I call a VI in a while loop and do not wait so he could spit out the results?  Data flow is my enemy on this one...

  The first VI treats its own figures (using the iteration count) and displays them on the PC.  Other indicators are the data of the called VI.  I want to be able to work around the blue circle node and receive data only that it will be available.

  Any help is appreciated.  Thank you.

  

  What I said OR the 'Start asynchronous call' is the preferred method for starting background tasks. This call is usually used to run background tasks. For example, you have a process of journal. When your application starts it would use the "asynchronous call Start" to start the process of journal and then move on to the other stuf. The process of the journal would then happily run in the background and the main application is free to do other things. Of course when implementing these types of systems you need a way to coordinate things like exit. This is where the queues and stuff come it.

• Debugging asynchronous calls

  When you use asynchronous calls, is there a way to see and/or kill the clones running? Let me explain my program a little structure.

  I develop a tests suite that can read in the test script files and run different (or the same) on several devices connected to a chassis OR modules of the AO. The two main components of my program are the CommandParserQueuer (CPQ) and the CommandExecutor (CE marking). A command queue is created during initialization. The CPQ reads in the script files and translated into commands adds those to the queue of the command. The controls are beams of the States of the enum and all data needed to perform this action. The CE marking is a machine of the State in queue. When queues begin to fill, the CE removes the items and perform the actions (e.g. AO tension adjustment, read data from the device, restart the device, etc.).

  Program to quit smoking, a stop command is sent to the EC, which simply sets the while loop stop true and it allows to get out. This worked well until I implemented the ability to run several tests at once, which meant from multiple instances of THIS Start Asychronous Call (options x 80 and x 40).

  Because of my design, I have to run a while loop inside the asynchronous calls, that goes against the recommended practice of not doing. During initialization, I create a command queue for each connected device. For example, if I have two devices DEVICE1, and 2 the device, two queues are created with these names and two these are called by reference to these queues. CES sitting then slowed until the queues fill up with items.

  The problem I have is that sometimes, but not always, blocks of code inside the CES are throwing errors, and also the CES not arrested in accordance with the instructions. I'm out all together of LabView. I also want to emphasize enforcement of clones. Is this possible?

  Any thoughts?

  During an instance multi-instance has a several traps.  You seem to have sailed with success some of them, but not all.  As Jed394 said, the framework of the actor should help with start and stop, but it looks like that your error is more due to a conflict of shared resource.  This resource conflict could be a hardware or software.  A few things to look for:

  1. Is the code that you share between reentrant CES?  It must all be, but nothing waiting for something (i.e. awaiting a DAQ card data) must be re-entrant, so that the two separate these may have their own instance.  There is a balance here between using a lot of memory and the contention on subVIs.
  2. You can try to use two items from the same material that cannot be used separately.  For example, you can not simultaneous, of two locations of code, read different analog inputs of the DAQ card even.  This can be quite hard to track down, since the hardware devices vary in their capabilities.
  3. Is that what your truly separate data space between your bodies?  Depending on how you configure access to data, the two CBS could try to access the same or incorrect data.

  Good luck.  Let us know if we can help you more.

• Saving the lightroom develop settings

  I have a question about registration of the development parameters in L ightroom CC 2015 once you remove a photo from the catalogue. My workflow is done in camera raw. Although I the have not used in the past I always thought that a . Xfile MP would save all adjustments of development keywords, flags etc. Now that I've tried it, I see that's not true.  I havet seems to save develop settings, but if you delete the photo, then re-import - it opens with the correct settings, but you cannot modify any of the final adjustments.  It also does not extract together with flags or color adjustments.

  Is there a way to do ? Normally, I like to keep my small catalog by removing pictures I do not wish to use it on a regular basis, but I can want to bring their return make some additional adjustments and then save them again once I was hoping that this economy and XMP file would allow me to do, but it doesn't appear to save the metadata not the setting of development parameters. Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  cpgilles wrote:

  I have a question on registration of the develop settings in Lightroom CC 2015 once you remove a photo from the catalogue. My workflow is done in camera raw. Although I the have not used in the past I always thought that one. XMP file would save all the settings development, keywords, flags etc. Now that I've tried it, I see that's not true.  It seems to save develop settings, but if you delete the photo, then re-import - it opens with the correct settings, but you cannot modify any of the final adjustments.  It also does not extract together with flags or color adjustments.

  Is there a way to do this? Normally, I like to keep my small catalog by removing pictures I do not wish to use it on a regular basis, but I can want to bring their return make some additional adjustments and then save them again once I was hoping that this economy and XMP file would allow me to do, but it doesn't appear to save the metadata not the setting of development parameters. Any help would be appreciated.

  I think you'll find (or you've already found) that Lightroom was not designed to be used in this way. Since you say that "any help would be appreciated", my Council, similar to the above, is to use Lightroom as it was expected, and you won't have these problems. The Act of deleting the photos is what you lose information and simply creates extra work for you. Don't not deleting photos is less work and ensures that you do not lose this information. The idea of keeping the small catalogues manages also against the idea behind the design of Lightroom... you want Lightroom to be the tool by which you can find all of your photos and you browse all your photos. There is no advantage to smaller catalogues and no disadvantage for large catalogs, when used correctly.

• I currently have the plan of photography, I want to upgrade to the full package

  Why, when I try to upgrade to the full package, what is proposed, it is quoting me the full price?

  Hi Gareth,

  You will need to cancel the current subscription and subscribe to the complete package.

  The price will be the actual price that is in charge of the subscription.

  Otherwise, you can check with the Adobe sales team.

  Pricing plans and creative Cloud membership | Adobe Creative Cloud

  Kind regards

  Sheena

• Where can I download the full version (no heel)?

  I'm looking for the full multilingual version and not the Stub Version for the installation of offlline. Where they can be downloaded?

  said millaard

  This is a link to the Stub version, not the full version (offline installation)...

  The mozilla.org/firefox/all page is normally where you get complete offline for Windows installation.

  Weird that they are now serving the stub Installer did not like for Windows on this page also for 36.0.4

  Try this instead.
  http://download.CDN.Mozilla.NET/pub/mozilla.org/Firefox/releases/latest/Win32/ like you just choose your language and the much larger .exe file without heel in name.

• The version of LabVIEW full development is necessary to correct the errors

  I gradually developed a large application of GOOP, he has been developing since 2012.  We have never had problems with the executable files before, but now when we're creating a generation, when you run the executable file, the arrow of execution is broken and you get the message "the LabVIEW full development version is necessary to correct the errors.  The search of the forums there are many people who have experienced the same error message but many different solutions.

  The same phenomenon occurs on any PC, I can create the version on another PC, same result.

  I can go back through SVN revsions until I found the latest copy of the project that will actually build, but then I needed to repeat all the coding done since.  Is that what I can do to track down the problem?  I suspect, it could be related to types incompatible cluster or a bad link to a sub VI, but the demand is so great, that it is impossible to look through all the code.

  Brian