With forms 10g server load balancing

Hello

I have a client who is just now dealing with a migration from a platform of client-server 6i (using Terminal servers) to a platform of web forms 10 g with several application 10 g standalone servers.

In the end, customer wants to activate load balancing in order to have some manage to each application server workload.

The idea to accomplish is to have a hardware load balancer. The customer has already a CISCO CSS 11503 SSL.
Is there a documentation where I can check more info on compatibility/configuration for this architecture.

Thank you for your attention.

Kind regards
Pedro Ribeiro

You can check this doc link: [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/hpux.1012/install.1012/install/toc.htm]
It say everything and anything mention on a load balancer, but I'll try to keep the research.

Greetings.

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • NIC teaming with the IP hash load balancing

    Hi guys

    I have a virtual machine with a VMXNET3 10 Gbps. It is usually have a heavy traffic with a special server and saturate one of my two physical NIC of 1 Gbps in its PortGroup. I want to know what's going to happen if I turn on "NIC Teaming for this portgroup with basic IP hash load balancing". In my case the source IP address and destination are not change so the aggregates of traffic between my two physical network adapters?

    To avoid saturating completely the two 1GbE NIC, it can also be useful to look in charge based on the grouping and the NIOC. It will ensure that the other streams of traffic VM are not crushed by this machine a virtual when it saturates a network card. The disadvantage is that it requires Enterprise Plus licenses (using a dvSwitch).

  • With view 5.1 load balancer

    Hey all,.

    I have a question about to lift our load balancing program and perform in our view environment 5.1.  I followed the article KB 2020913 to get our servers view running with SSL certificates.  I'm doing our load balancer in place and I keep getting errors in SSL certificate.  Here is a brief summary of our facility.  I have two servers to view (VCS1 and VCS2) connection with our internal certificate authority SSL certificates.  There is our program of load balancing.  When you use VMware View Client and go to the view.company.com address of the load balancer, I get "pipe in the certificate name is invalid or does not match.  I click on 'See the certificate' and it is to show the certificate of one of the connection view servers.  A I mess up something with the installation program, or have I missed an obvious solution?  Any help would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    -Kyle

    Hello

    It is the expected behavior. With SSL, the certificate name is checked by report specified by the client host name.

    There are two ways to deal with this. If you are using certificates with another subject of your load-balanced alias name, it all will work.

    for example if you have some certs on each connection to the server (or the Security Server) with the names cs1.myco.com and cs2.myco.com but customers do you think users will connect using a load-balanced alias view.myco.com, then by ensuring that each cert has another name of subject of view.myco.com then the hostname match control work.

    See KB. VMware.com/kb/2006751 for more information.

    Mark

  • See the connection to the server, load balancer & physical workstations

    We deploy a VMWare view environment and we use a combination of physical and virtual desktops.

    When install us the Agent to view physical workstations with the /V "VDM_VC_MANAGED_Agent = 0" settings. " This allows to specify the Server Manager to view to record the workstation during installation.

    So far we've just been specifying a connection view servers and everything was fine. But now we are getting our deployment and we want to ensure that we have the appropriate redundancy built in.

    If the server connection view that physical workstation is registered during installation fails, is grave view agent automatically knows to start watching one of the replica servers?

    If it isn't... We are keen to implement a load balancer between the workstations phyiscal on connection view servers. Are there problems with it?

    I found many articles balancer redundancy and load for VMWare View, but none don't talk specifically a load balancer between physical work stations with the agent of the view and connection servers.

    Take a look in the registry on the physical Machine, he must list all available connection brokers it.

    Linjo

  • Adpaters/active with the vPort ID load balancing

    Looking at the following configuration, my understanding is that some virtual machines in this group of ports will use vmnic1 and some will use vmnic6 (based on their ID vport).  Pretty simple.

    Assume that the uplink different swithces cards.  This works because there is no tree blocking one of the unplinks.  Question is: what happens to traffic on vmnic6 if the link fails? (failure of the local liaison, NIC failure, etc. - I'm even not consider upstream failure here).  My understanding is that vmnic1 will not resume because the windows are related to the vmnic6.  Only if there is a Standby adapter is there a link to relief for vmnic6 or vmnic1.  In other words, with vPort (no Etherchannel) of load balancing, two active/active adapters are not 'Standby' to each other.  Is that correct, or am I wrong?

    I ask because I see this routinely on customer sites.  But what I always have it set up as a channel of port for a single switch, if two switches or was to be used, then I made active/active and then included a Standby adapter for failover should one Fail of active principles.  Or, if all I need is resumed, not load balancing, I just did a single active/passive and alternate ports between them as a form of manual balancing groups.

    I always just assumed Active would not switch to another asset without a port channel/IP-hash config (where the whole reason for standby in the first place).  I'm quite right or completely wrong?  Later today, I want to test this is a lab while monitoring with top.

    img.jpg

    With the default configuration in your example, the virtual machine-> Teddy assignment is when a virtual machine is running. In the case of a Teddy/link failure the VMs will be assigned to other natachasery. A standby NIC cannot be used unless there is a power failure.

    André

  • Need help with Forms 10g documentation!

    Hi friends,

    I need documentation of forms 10g can someone give me the link I downloaded contains only the pdf installation files and documentation for reports, but I'm looking our for Forms 10 g any help would be appreciated.

    Kind regards
    Maury

    Maury,
    The simple fact of the matter is that Oracle no longer publishes a full set of documentation of the product (for example; User Manual, etc.) Everything is now in the forms help system. The last time Oracle published the kind of documentation you are looking for has been with Oracle Developer 2000 (Forms 4.5). You can still get the pdf version of these books in the Oracle Forms Developer and Forms Server Documentation. Download them quickly because they may be there much longer! It seems that Oracle is slowly remove ALL content that is more than 4-5 years old.

    Hope this helps,
    Craig B-)

    If someone useful or appropriate, please mark accordingly.

  • Hyperion Planning11.1.2.3. Server load balancing

    We will install and configure Hyperion planning in the cluster environment. After you have configured the servers planning successfully how to implement load balancing. Do we need to use hardware or software load balancing. I have no idea on balancers load. We must use to configure logical address that points to the load balancer server but do not know how the load balancing server must be? Please notify.

    Install all along planning to Server1 products and configure them.

    Go to Server2, install only the planning and deploy using the same database.

    WebLogic will create 2 (Plannin0, planning of the depenses1) servers in single Cluster (using the Round robin algorithm).

    Thus, at the time of access automatically weblogic will redirect requests internally.

    Thank you

    Mady

  • Network of twinning with Port trunks to support the host ESX VShere 4 with several NIC for load balancing across a HP ProCurve 2810 - 24 G

    We are trying to increase production of our ESX host.

    ESX4 with 6 NIC connected to HP Procurve 2810 - 24G 2 ports; 4; 6; 8; 10 and 12.

    The

    grouping of parameters on ESX is rather easy to activate, however, we do not know

    How to configure the HP switch to support above connections.

    Pourrait

    someone please help with a few examples on how to seup the HP switch.

    Help will be greatly appreciated as we continue to lose tru RDP sessions

    disconnects.

    Best regards, Hendrik

    Disabling protocols spanning-tree on the Procurve ports connected to the ESX host is going to promote a recovery more rapid port. Similarly, running global spanning tree is not recommended if you mix some VLAN iSCSI and data in the same fabric (i.. e. you do not want a STP process to hang storage IO). Spanning tree on your switches, look PVST (or Procurve BPMH) to isolate the STP VLANs unique events.

    In regard to the load balancing is, by default (route based port ID) value algorithm requires less overhead on the ESX hosts.  You may not use LACP on the Provurve the lack of facilities LACP ESX. You must use "route based on the IP hash" sideways ESX and 'static trunks' on the side of Procurve. Unless you have specific reasons why your network need loads this configuration, I'd caution against it for the following reasons:

    (1) IP hash requires thorough inspection of packages by the ESX host, increasing CPU load as load package increases;

    (2) the static configuration puts switch physics rigid and critical ESX host port mapping. Similarly, groups of ports all will fail as the Procurve batteries for management only and won't be on switches 802.3ad circuits Group (i.e. all ports of a group of circuits must be linked to a single switch) - this isn't a limitation of the port ID routing;

    (3) K.I.S.S. love port ID mix of port ID, beacon probe and failover on the port assignments you will get segregation of the raw traffic without sacrificing redundancy - even through switches.

    I hope this helps!

    -Collin C. MacMillan

    SOLORI - Oriented Solution, LLC

    http://blog.Solori.NET

    If you find this information useful, please give points to "correct" or "useful".

  • FDMEE with LCMS migration on load balancer

    Hello

    When I click on FDMEE in shared Service, I get "EPMLCM-13000: Service not available"error. "  I don't know if this is the case only because we use a load balancer.

    Some that I am not able to run in one of the environments - 11.1.2.4. Features of FDMEE are very good.

    Is just me or everyone sailing in the same boat?

    Thank you

    AA

    So if SSL is discharged then communication LWA will be on by default http and not the LB will accept that.

    Similar to the Standard deployment topology

    See you soon

    John

  • Maintain the Forms 6i with form 10g

    Hi all

    I have a case where we want to go to form 10g and one of my client doesn't want to Forms 6i. We have a utility where, in case, we say that if the version is Forms 6i and then compile as part of another (IE., Version is Forms 10g) then compile the other party. Similar to the concept of IfDef.

    Kind regards
    Alok Dubey

    There will be no conversions built-ins, only errors of compilation on built-ins obsolete if they are used which are VERY rare, migration should go very smoothly.
    I suggest you try on a couple of forms, PLL and MMB.

    Tony

  • Lighthouse of unusable probing with the IP hash load balancing.

    I read this in one Web site, but I would like to know the reason for this?

    Is it because the IP hash uses IP source and destination to select the path and so for the markup, it can only detect the failure of the link for one of the trajectory of two?

    Is there some user guide of VMware or documentation that talks about what I can read on this subject?

    Thank you and have a nice week,

    Anthony.

    Please take a look at http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1012819 and the links provided in this KB. This explains why probe headlight does not work with EtherChannel.

    André

  • The side load balancing test server

    Hello
    Can anyone tell me about any test cases for server side in a 11.1.0.7 RAC load balancing?

    I have a 2 RAC nodes with either local_listener and remote_listener correctly (for load balancing server-side). For the test, I create a TNS to my side client that points to a single node of the PAP (a single ADDRESS entry pointing to node 1 of my CARS). So, this customer, whenever I log in, it always connects me node 1 I mentioned in the LMO. This means that server-side load balancing works jointly with the client side only load balancing and I would also add the address entered my TNS for the second node? If Yes, then how can I create a test case to check server load balancing?

    Thank you

    Salman

    Dear Salman Qureshi,

    There is a small video about load balancing server (http://www.dsvolk.ru/oracle/racdd4d/demos/video/loadbalance/server/serverloadbalance_viewlet_swf.html)

  • Forms 10g 10.1.2.3 with Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 in Win 7 64 bit

    Hi all

    I'm not able to open applications developed with forms 10g (10.1.2.3) in IE8.
    I am able to open it from the same client using google chrome or Firefox 3.6.
    JRE version 1.6 is 33.

    Fact any body knows what should be the parameters of IE8 to make shapes with IE8.
    Y at - it no metalink how to document?

    Thanks in advance

    Guigui

    You have made a minor mistake.

    CLSID:CLSID:CAFEEFAC-0016-0033-FFFF-ABCDEFFEDCBA is not correct.

    Her take: either of the following:

    #Dynamic CLSID - runs with any installed JRE with Internet Explorer
    jpi_classid=clsid:8AD9C840-044E-11D1-B3E9-00805F499D93
    
    #Attempts to use any JRE in a specified family
    jpi_classid=clsid:CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-FFFF-ABCDEFFEDCBA
    
    #Static CLSID attempts to use a specified JRE or newer in the same major release.
    jpi_classid=clsid:CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0033-ABCDEFFEDCBA
    

    For browsers other than IE, you must set the MIME type. Then choose them:

    #Forces the use of a specified JRE version
    jpi_mimetype=application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.6.0_33
    
    #Attempts to use any JRE in the specified family
    jpi_mimetype=application/x-java-applet;version=1.6
    
    #Use any installed JRE
    jpi_mimetype=application/x-java-applet
    
  • Load balancing question

    Hi all

    I have a question on the load balancing between several hosts of session.

    We have 6 Guest session, I created a managed with a specifik balancing application rule "Session desktop host advanced remotely. last Friday, he started a few problems, but we have not made any changes.

    the fist session host server had 71 active users and other servers were only 30.

    How is that possible?

    Do I have to put the rule on each server load balancing?

    Hello Sander,

    You must apply the rule individually for each RDSH of load balancing. Not on the managed desktop application. In our configuration, this does not work then maybe of the same counts for you.

    concerning

    Sijtze

  • VPN load balancing

    Hello

    for Concentrators VPN load-balancing, a similar configuration must be to both devices. The master of the cluster config VPN concentrator push. for other members of the cluster, or must be manually?

    Thanks in advance

    Hi Abu Alqader,

    The decision to use load balancing or VRRP is a lot depends on your VPN environment.

    Personally, I think that load balancing is good/ideal if you have a lot of clients VPN, for example > 500 users. With 2 VPN3K of load balancing, you can share VPN connectivity between the boxes and will not weigh 1 VPN unit at any time. Also, if one of these boxes is down, affected vpn clients can still connect to the other device. But you must configure the VPN backup server in all the software VPN Client to achieve configuration.

    VRRP, however, has its own advantages. If the primary VPN device, all VPN Clients can still connect to a 1 modem router VPN, VRRP, allowing practically to the backup device to inherit/use primary/active VPN public IP (as the gateway). With regard to non max users, VRRP probably appropriate for the low-end model like 3005 (IPsec-200/50 clientless) & 3015 (IPSec 100/75 without client).

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_data_sheet09186a00801d3b56.html

    However, the final decision depends on what option you feel better suite your environment. There is no right or wrong.

    Pls rate if find you this post will help you.

    Rgds,

    AK

Maybe you are looking for