WLC 2100 limit SSID Broadcast for each AP

Similar Questions

• Limit data entries "For-Each".

  Hello
  
  I have a model with different paintings that insert lines using the syntax "For each. Is there a piece of code that allows a limit on the number of entries in the table?
  
  For example, my table is:
  
  for-each UGQualificationCompletedVORow_
  
  and I want to assure you that only ten lines are visible on the model, which would be the syntax?
  
  Thank you very much
  
  James

  Do you mean that you need to display only 10 lines of your group?
  You can then use<><11]?>

• How to limit the bandwidth for each different devices connected to my router

  Hello

  Thanks in advance!

  Can you help me to limit bandwidth on perticular devices, I use NETGEAR (WNR1000v2 - N150 wireless router) and the version of the firmware of the V1.1.2.58, like almost 4 devices are connected to this router, I want to limit the speed of bandwidth to each device.

  I have not found the Qos in my Netgear.

  It might help if you provided in details with screenshots.

  Thank you

  Samira

  Not possible with this model of router

• Disable the SSID broadcast

  I have a v1 WRT610N router and cannot find where I'm able to disable the SSID broadcast.  I thought I had looked at all the settings screens, but I can't.   can someone tell me how to disable the SSID broadcast for this router?  Thank you!

  Click on wireless on top and it should show these two things

  (On the red circles)

  

• Calendar of the apex; limit values for each day/cell

  Apex 4.2

  I'm working on a calendar widget to my page. The calendar will be specific sectors (using the abbreviation of sector space maximze) for each day. When you use the calendar, I noticed the sectors more you have, the cell for this day will begin to stretch down / vertically. I tried to change this so that a specific day / cell would show only a number of areas. For example, maybe one day 20 sectors are attributed to him, however, I only want to show 5 of them and then a text saying 'See more'. The text 'see more' will eventually be a link, but it's far from being the problem.

  Initially, the request for this was along the lines of:

  select
  the_id, the_date, the_sector, the sector_abbrev
  from Table
  where this = that
  

  It would show all sectors for all the days on the calendar. Yet once, I wanted to limit the output every day as some days would indicate all 20 sectors (their abbreviations), and some would be 3 or four in function. So to say that there are 30 sectors (10 1st), 4 of the 15, 12 on 20-4 on November 29. I want to allow only five abbreviations of sector which must appear in a cell until the link "see more" appears. I came up with the following query:

  Select
  the_sector_abbrev, the_id, the_date, the sector
  from Table
  where rownum <= 5 and (this = that)
  union all
  Select 'View More', null, null, null
  from dual
  

  I found that it would be limiting my calendar for showing that four areas throughout the month of November and not for each day / cell on the calendar. I am to discover that 'rownum' is perhaps not the way to go. I don't know how to specify for each of the calendar days rownum. I don't know how to capture every day / the Calendar cell. Maybe I need a more complicated or a subquery where clause. But overall, from my example above, the 1st show four of the sectors and then the link "See more", the 15th would show the four sectors and thats all, the 20th century would show four sectors and her "see more" link and so on.

  Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  NewApexCoder wrote:

  I had no idea of the possible application of solution would be too complex.

  It is not the case:

  with calendar_data as (
      select
          ins.sector_abbrev_name
        , sch.hwe_inspection_scheduling_id
        , sch.inspection_date
        , sch.instructions
        , sch.inspection_sector_id
        , sch.high_water_event_id
        , ins.inspection_sector_name
        , hwe.event_name
        , row_number()
              over (
                partition by sch.inspection_date
                order by sch.inspection_date, ins.inspection_sector_name) day_sector_rn
      from
          hwe_inspection_scheduling sch
            left join inspection_sectors ins
              on sch.inspection_sector_id = ins.inspection_sector_id
            left join high_water_events hwe
              on sch.high_water_event_id = hwe.high_water_event_id
      where
          (   sch.high_water_event_id = :p0_high_water_event_id
           or :p0_high_water_event_id is null))
  select
      inspection_sector_id
    , inspection_date
    , inspection_sector_name
    , sector_abbrev_name
    , ...
    , null -- Generate URL for sector links here
  from
      calendar_data
  where
      day_sector_rn <= 5
  union all
  select
      null
    , trunc(the_date) + 1 - interval '1' second
    , null
    , 'View More…'
    , ...
    , null -- Generate URL for "View More..." links here
  from
      calendar_data
  group by
      the_date
  having
      count(*) > 5
  

• SSID broadcast

  Want a couple of opinions on the broadcast of the SSID or not. We have 200 series 1200 ap on a University campus and currently distributed only in a few areas (5%) on campus we also have cisco WLSE to manage.

  In my humble OPINION, not broadcasting the SSID is security the same way that wrap you in aluminum foil you made the bulletproof. (It is not / is not, believe me).

  A large part of the decision boils down to bandwidth management.

  For example, do not broadcast your SSID, anyone using MS Windows Zero Config Wireless will have connection problems... ZWC always will prefer a SSID broadcast, often even if you have the client 'hard-coded' to associate with a specific SSID. Expect phone calls.

  Or the other decision, I hope that you have some solid backend authentication and authorization.

  It is essentially you have something other people want to (bandwidth, potentially free band). If you're lucky, people will * only * steal bandwidth.

  In the past, I think you will find that 'only' bandwidth theft is not enough, you will get some hotshot King or kiddie-script, or spammer, porn that will do malicious things in and on your network (if you are broadcasting your SSID or not.. Word bypass).

  Convenience for users and reduce the ' my laptop does not connect to your wireless system (it tries to connect to rogue AP from some students or other hotspot) calls. "

  Also keep them my mind is that if you don't broadcast your SSID, unlike someone else (malicious) (advertise * your * SSID)... they can usurp the user and capture traffic... or at least it makes it much easier to perform a man-in-the-middle attack (do a search for "ettercap").

  Advertise your SSID and have a good system of auth/auth on the back-end. Everything in the newspaper and be vigilant. Have a plan (and a strong policy) to deal with attackers and did not hesitate to run it.

  It is worth a few days of discussion, around this topic and a variety of opinions each valid in a given context. You must weigh the consumers against the administration, against the risk, compared to the budget... and a dozen other variables.

  (In general), there is no single best answer for most scenarios.

  That's why a good designer / architect system pulls down the fortunes and worth ever penny.

  Good luck

  Scott

• Uplink on the WLC 2100 series

  Hello

  I missed something in the Cisco WLC 2100 series documentation. In fact, the plug technical it is mentioned that the WLC 2100 "provides eight 10/100 Ethernet ports to support a combination of access points and rising redundant LAN", while in the configuration guide noted that the WLC 2100 supports no LAG (aggregation of links). So how WLC 2100 can use a redundant network connection without aggregation of links?

  Thank you in advance.

  You can use a port for management and interface ap - manager and another for the vlan specific used for the ssid of your wlan with connection of access points to your WLC. This way you can say that port 1 is your management and ap-Manager, port 2 is for your internal ssid vlan x, port 3 is for your voice ssid vlan x, port 4 is for the traffic of comments, 5 & 6 port is used to connect the two access points.

• Are there separate libraries for each Member in the family plan?

  We want to start the Apple family of music Plan in our House, but everyone in my family wants to add their own music and to keep it separate from the rest of the members of the plan.

  I have 2 questions about it:

  1. every member gets their own library of music that they can sort and customize without interfering with the music of other members?

  2. each member individually has the limit of 100,000 of the song, or is it 100 000 songs for the whole family?

  We will get the plan until these issues are addressed, if anything like that would be useful!

  Hi Josie1374,

  I understand that you have a few questions about the sharing of family in Apple music. I have some information for you which should be able to help answer these questions. First of all, you should know that each family member in the family of the Apple music-sharing plan will be themselves, individual account, Apple's music:

  A subscription to Apple's music for
  each Member of your family.

  With a family membership of Apple's music, up to 6 people in your family can enjoy unlimited access to music from Apple on their devices. Everyone gets full access and individual music library of Apple, recommendations of experts, radio world-wide 24/7 with 1 beats and radio on demand. This is the world of music for the creations of any

  iCloud - family sharing - Apple

  https://www.Apple.com/icloud/family-sharing/

  As is the case, this information applies to each individual account, which should solve your second question:

  How music Apple manages your downloaded songs

  • You can have up to 100 000 songs in your music library. Songs you purchased from the iTunes Store do not count against this limit.

  Add music to your collection to your music library Apple - Apple Support

  https://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT204925

  Be vigilant and thank you for visiting the communities of Apple Support.

• Limit the bandwidth for WNR614 router n300 wireless devices

  Hello

  I use the WiFi WNR614 N300 router. Is it possible to limit the bandwidth for devices that are connected on it.

  I thank you,

  Vignesh C

  Hi @vic2408

  Welcome to the community!

  To answer your question, there is no way to limit the bandwidth on each of the devices.
  You may need to use a 3rd party software to do this.

• Is it possible under the EULA to have several virtual machines on a single physical hard disk while using the same OS license or do I need a separate license for each virtual computer?

  I have several programs that are not compatible with my 64 bit Windows 7 operating system.  I would like to run each different software under another virtual machine of VMWare (5 packs of different software programs and 5 different virtual machines of Windows XP).  These would all be installed on your laptop.  I can use the same license of Windows XP for each virtual machine, or do I need a separate XP license for each (different XP in case 5 licenses)?

  It is lifted directly from my EULA:

  1. GRANT OF LICENSE.

  The manufacturer that you grant the following rights, provided that

  comply you with all terms and conditions of this EULA:

  1.1 installation and use.  You may install, use, access,

  display and run one copy of the SOFTWARE on

  THE COMPUTER.  The SOFTWARE may not be used

  by more than two 2-processor both on the

  COMPUTER, unless a greater number is

  indicated on the certificate of authenticity.
  Then...
  This means that as long as you are running two or more instances of XP at the same TIME, you agree? Or does this mean that, after you install once, you have reached your limit?
  I imagine that most people (including those who are running Microsoft!) will say that the second interpretation is correct.
  However...
  If this is the case, anyone their hard drive as a backup to clone strategy would violate the EULA!

• EA6300 SSID Broadcast

  How can I disable the ssid broadcast?

  I can't find it on my EA6500, and it might be the same for all routers Linksys EA. I found this link which explains why he is no longer available.

• Printer Hp6700: unable to connect to the router wireless D - Link DI-514 when SSID Broadcast is set to no.

  HP6700 printer: unable to connect to the router wireless D - Link DI-514 when the router Broadcast SSID is set to no. My MAC laptop and HP laptop both work with the set SSID on no. If I change the router Wireless SSID Broadcast is YES, then the printer HP6700 can connect to the wireless router. I set up the printer it saying that the SSID and password have been, the same as both of my laptops, but it connects ever, unless I have change the router to broadcast the SSID. Help!

  Have you tried to update the firmware on the DI-514?

  You can also try to set a static IP address on the printer, and then assign the printer to the list of DHCP static in the interface of the router.
  To give a static IP address to your printer:
  -Print a the front of the printer Network Setup Page. Note the IP address of the printer.
  -Enter the IP address in a browser to reveal the internal settings of the printer.
  -Choose the network tab, then wireless along the left side, then on the IPv4 tab.
  -On this screen, you want to set a manual IP address. You must assign an IP address outside the range that the router sets automatically (called the DHCP range). If you do not know the range, change the last set of numbers (those after the last '.') 250
  -Apply the subnet 255.255.255.0 (unless you know it's different, if so, use it)
  -Enter the IP of your router (on the Page of the Network Config) for the gateway.
  -Enter for the first DNS 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 for second DNS. It's Google DNS. You can choose a different external DNS if you wish.
  -Click 'apply '.
  Now, stop the router and printer, start the router, wait, and then start printing.

  After that you remove and re - add the printer to your Mac.

  Show support by clicking on the blue Kudos star in the post that solved your problem. Doing so will help the other members of the forum their solutions also.

• Unable to connect via wireless with SSID broadcast disabled

  I want to configure my router for my SSID is not broadcast, because I think it's a logical step to take for increased security. I have not been able to do since I started using my new laptop Inspiron 5558. I tried this several times and every time I turn off the SSID broadcast, I am not able to connect to the Wi - Fi on this laptop. Other remote computers in my house and my smartphone connect without problem, but nothing I've tried helps my new computer Dell laptop to connect via Wi - Fi, except for allowing the SSID broadcast.

  I have a router Actiontec MI424WR reverend E. I have installed the new driver and the Intel PROset utility and unfortunately nothing has changed. I went to the settings to investigate some of the other solutions offers, and I came across something that seems to have solved my problem. What I found in SETTINGS/network & Internet/change adapter options/Wi-Fi/see the status of my properties of connection/Wireless / on the connection tab, it was an uncontrolled area with the words "connect even if the network is not broadcasting its name (SSID). I checked this box, and since then, I was able to connect to my network wireless with SSID broadcast disabled. I will now call this resolved and if no new problems arise. start a new post. Thanks for sticking with me on this.

  Ed J.

• Remove the secondary controller and tertiary high availability for each access point

  I want to remove secondary and tertiary sector controller of high availability for each access point. I have more than 900 APs associated with a Version of the WLC 8510 8.0.121.0 software. What is the best/better way to remove secondary and tertiary controller?
  Or I can create a model first. We use version 2.2

  Hello

  Easiest way:

  Yes you can do this by using the first Cisco Infrastructure, you can create a Setup AP Lightweight model to specify the name of the PDC and the IP address and specify an empty value (choose the first empty option in the drop-down list) and 0.0.0.0 for the secondary and tertiary sector controllers.  Then you can apply this model to the AP, and she must remove (virgins all) values for these fields.

  Long way:

  Yes there is no clean way to remove it from the CLI. you need to manually remove each on the AP.

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Subject of load balancing.  An arm mode require ESG instance for each requirement of LB?

  Hello

  Most document indicates an arm mode drawback is that for each LB (One - Arm) requirements, separate

  Instance of the ESG is needed.

  Is this true?

  I feel that I can deploy an ESG for 9 balance of the load of an arm as the next parameter.

  -Deploy an ESG

  -Add vNIC 9 to the GSS and add the IP address of the LB for each segment. (EX. 10.0.0.1/24 to first vNIC, 10.0.10.1/24 to the second vNIC and so on...)

  -Disable the routing

  -Add LB VIP pool as usual.

  I said '9' to limit, because there is limitation of VM vNIC 10, and 1 can be used for future uplink...

  I'm sorry that I can't prove it by tests, because I do not have the test environment.

  Number of subnets in 1 single cutting edge

  A single cutting edge can actually be connected to the networks of more than 10.

  Indeed 1 edge interface can be of the type: 'Delete', 'Internal', but also 'trunk '.

  Use of the "trunk" type, you can create secondary interfaces and up to 200 Sub interfaces supported in 6.1.x within the same interface.

  Now on your question: 1 m LBS per subnet

  You can certainly have the same edge with several interfaces / subnets and configure VIP in each subnet.

  Note: You must opaque (SNAT) mode under the pool to the guarantee of the response from the server will return via the Edge-LB.

  The question I have is about: "disable routing."

  Do you mean that the edge will not need any itinerary to meet clients. In other words, applications for all customers hit an edge-LB VIP comes from a subnet which exists on the edge?

  If the answer to that question is 'yes '. Then, I agree.

  If the answer to this question is 'no' (customers come from Internet, for example). Then, I disagree.

  Dimitri