Workflow for interviews using markers

Similar Questions

• Flash website using the conversion (Greensock/Starling/Away3D libraries) to HTML5. Is there an efficient workflow for this kind of mass conversion?

  Hello!

  I read that demoralize him articles everywhere on the great navigators pushing Flash to the side and supporting the HTML5 for awhile now. I have a personal site that I keep and put a decent amount of work using the design. At the heart of the site is driven by external classfiles AS3 using Greensock libraries. Also, I went 3D with 2D content content using the Framework Starling and Away3D libraries. I am researching the possibilities of creating the same types of drawings in HTML5, if possible. Greensock already fully supports HTML5 with its new libraries GSAP. Starling and Away3D I'm not so sure...

  I would love to continue to grow in the same method, using FlashCC, but this is already limited to only desktop browsers. That's fine with me, if it remains bearable on workstations, but at this point I don't really know how well supported Flash will remain same in desktop browsers. I must admit that my real job keeps me pretty busy that my search time is quite limited, so I might be way off the coast.

  Is there any known and efficient workflow for the transition from a site that only uses external AS3 classFiles and 2D or 3D to the HTML5 canvas content? Is this even worth it if I'm comfortable with only to have the support of desktop browser? It seems to me that, at least in the office environment, Flash will retain a strong foot.

  I use the package full creative suite + FlashDevelop as my toolkit and have been reading upward on the discussion of FlashCC targeting HTML5 canvas. It's really interesting to me, but at the same time it seems to work with SWF movies which contain all their ActionScript. It is not the structure that I followed at all, and it wouldn't really work-able at the port just the classFiles external back into SWF movies since not all the .as files has a SWF that is directly related. In other words, I wonder if it is still possible for me to consider a transitional workflow to HTML5 canvas? It seems at some point I might have to bite the bullet and refactor everything from the beginning, which I must admit is not an appetizing idea.

  I just want to start a discussion with Adobe and other creators out there using entirely external .as files and juggle several libraries in their Flash projects for the future. I want to see what workflows are out there to conquer this kind of problem and if supported in the desktop browser environment is even really a problem.

  -Cheers and sorry for the wall of text

  I think you should read more and worry less. Microsoft include Flash Player in IE and Edge. Google include Flash player in Chrome. Firefox Announces recently committed to the development of a Flash plugin, even if they cease to support other plugins. I don't think that Apple will stop supporting plugins at all.

  Thus, all current users of your will see your site for at least the next few years.

• Audio workflow for Skype necessary records

  Hey everybody,

  My name is Quin and I did a podcast in my spare time. I use Adobe Audition for both multitrack and registration work, and a recent addition, I did the podcast is recording Skype calls with some people. I wanted to bring in Audition to work with, but I found it quite difficult. First of all, Skype audio settings are (as shown in the screenshot below) quite limited.

  The same files they are audio only - are saved in .mov format and I when I put them in hearing, they are open as stereo audio files with four channels (I think it's the phase) even if they audio seems to be exactly the same in both channels.

  

  I use the range markers to find audio clips I want to insert into the multitrack view. Records that I do at home (inside the application of hearing) with microphones and an apogee Duet, the sound comes out like this:

  

  This audio is really easy to segment and a non-destructive mix in audition multitrack mode. I can use a Bus, and transform this audio in stereo simply (the audio appears in both channels)

  What I'm trying to discern is the best way to take the first section of the audio (with four channels) and send it to the multitrack. When I take a marker of the .mov file range convert and send it to the multitrack mode, multitrack audio levels are far away. Only half of the audio comes as amplified and I can't use a bus to mix to the point where the noise levels are correct. It looks like this, which is not at all what the original noise levels were recorded (see the first screenshot of the display of waveform above):

  Does anyone have a suggested workflow for how I can convert this audio so it aligns the recordings that I make at home? I tried several methods, but they all seem quite long and contrary to intuition and I would really like to hear some busy people more professionally on how I can do that, ideally, reducing to a minimum the number of destructive changes I make to the original audio file. If I do an initial conversion, it's cool, in which case I'd like to hear some suggestions on how to do the same.

  Thank you very much for your time and help,

  Quin

  It is quite easy to get rid of the duplicates. If you click on the track controls (the L R boxes and on the RIGHT side of each track) you can turn off each duplicate, and then they will appear gray on the screen. Then go Ctrl + A to select the entire file and then Shift Alt + C to copy the selection to a new. Only the operating range will be copied, so you'll end up with just both sides of the conversation in stereo, which is what you want. You must save this, and it becomes your working copy. There is another advantage to this as well - will now change you a copy of the original and the original will remain untouched, so you can always go back to it. It is still considered to be good practice!

• "Workflow" for Slow Motion DSLR

  Hi, I've been experimenting with the creation of idle smoothly in a calendar of 1080/25 and questioned on the best workflow. (I used a Canon 70 d, stipulating that 50 frames per second at 720)

  So: Chronology 1080/25 Pro Res FCP7 (majority of the 1080/25 source footage)

  I want to add a short section of idle and for that I shot in 720/50 - but of course it is made at 25 frames per second when added to the timeline and playback is stuttering when 50% of the speed value.

  So I sent the clip (at 50%) to 4 Motion and applied optical flow - this provided a smoother playback

  (I tried to optical flow on a clip of 1080/25 to 50% but reading stuttered slightly)

  I just wanted to confirm if it is the best workflow for idling smoothly.  Also when I tried to apply the optic flow on a second Motion 4 already 'optic flow"selected clip, but when I clicked on that nothing happened - I had to close out Motion and start over with the clip under a new name.

  SMOOTH SLOW MOTION OF 60 P USING CINEMA TOOLS

  http://library.CreativeCOW.NET/ross_shane/slow-motion_cinema-tools/1

• Training for the use of the company

  Does anyone know if Adobe implements some sort of training services for businesses using the business function? With either an employee of Adobe or a tutorial?

  Expert services are available: these are 30 minute sessions focusing on the advice of workflow.

  Creative cloud for teams users are entitled to 2 sessions of Expert Services per year.

  Creative enterprise Cloud ETLA customers are entitled to unlimited Expert sessions.

  Overview Adobe Creative Cloud Expert Services and appointments

• Effective workflow for adding images

  I use RoboHelp HTML 2015 to the author of guides to the user for software products.  My workflow for creating often involves the capture and the addition of images, I have written a text in HR.  For example, I could

  • Write several paragraphs about a topic in HR
  • Make a screenshot of the software product using SnagIt to save the PNG file in a subfolder of the project named Images.
  • Back to HR and click the Image button to insert an image in Design view.

  This is the point where my workflow slows to a crawl, and I'm looking for suggestions on how to reduce the number of steps/click.  The next part of the workflow looks like this:

  • In the Picture dialog box, I navigate to the subfolder that contains my images and the new PNG file.
  • Given that I have not used the new image in a project document yet, the name of the file does not appear in the list of files.
  • I click on another PNG file that was used and manually change the name to match the name of my new image file.
  • The preview window displays the new image, and I click OK to insert the image into the document.

  We try to use a lot of images in our user guides, these extra steps end up adding a good amount of time for the process of creation.  They also distract the task at hand - the creating user's guide.

  There are two things that would make it a lot faster for me.  The first would be for me to be able to say HR folder I want to find my image files so that I don't have to navigate every time I insert a picture.  The second would be for HR to show me the image files, even if they have not been added to a document in my project.

  Does anyone have any suggestions on how to speed up my work flow while keeping the capacity of the author/capture/add images at the same time?

  Thanks for your help.

  Ben

  Hello

  Yes, I feel your pain on the bit to type a few characters as Paul suggested. I begged the developers of this feature for a long time while now nothing does not.

  I see two ways that you can consider which would probably improve this workflow. Both are eerily similar.

  In the first approach, you have a window Explorer Windows open on your site and images. So when you want a picture, you more pop to this window and just click and drag the image in the editor.

  In the second approach, the pod Resouorce Manager allows you to basically do the same thing I told in the first approach. The only real difference here is that you first need to configure the pod of Resource Manager to point to the location that you want to use.

  See you soon... Rick

• Best "workflow" for Sony A7sii and GH4 - Res Pro or DNxHD?

  Hi all

  I'm filming a documentary of 90 minutes on a Sony A7sii like Cam 1 and a Panasonic GH4 camera 2. 23.97fps to 3840 x 2160. We need to have 4 k options for future use. We will very likely use a certain amount of purchased both action sequences. I am currently working on what happens to be the best workflow with final export to the spirit. I need to export the final movie in Res Pro Apple or DNxHD - and I'm trying to figure who is going to be the best from start to finish.

  I'll be transcoding footage in function in order to make the workflow on the timeline as fluid and less tax on the processor as possible but also ensure final best made possible. I found that editing in the formats of native files (4 k) of each camera - even when the parameter/scaling to the size of the image - is very heavy on the processor and he staggers scouring or reading. So should I choose HQ or DNxHD pro.

  Also - on this basis, should what sequence settings I use? Creating a sequence of the clip with a Res Pro first clip gives me preset film Arri. Seems the timeline without effort on playback and scrub.

  Thanks in advance!

  ProRes 'was' standard in the Apple world, so became very common. DNxHD/R/HQ options are really become as well or better for most uses, it is just newer. On my PC, DNxHD cut almost as quickly as Cineform and a little faster than ProRes. They are sorta close... and is the guarantee of a your mileage MAY vary!

  So do a few quick tests. A few hours transcoding in two or three choices, then to the same projects, applying the same effects (while taking note of reading), then export on and schedule exports will give you an answer for you.

  Neil

• IOM: How to create workflows for demand

  11 GR 2 IOM 11.1.2.2

  How to create a workflow to IOM, where an administrator (except xelsysadm) in IOM is able to add a user to a role.

  Links to documentation, tutorials etc. would be useful.

  I guess you're looking at approval workflow.

  The following can be used:

  Development of Workflows for approval and commissioning Manual - 11g Release 2 (11.1.2)

  In addition, many enjoy exercise of the SOA approval workflow is available by oracle.

  ~ J

• This is for professional use? I don't understand

  so, I really like the features that it brings, but I don't understand how it must be used for professional use, and not for amateur to 'play '.

  So I would always use a professional voice artist or actor for a voice of characters. How does that fit in the workflow rather than the facilitator do?

  Just don't get it.

  Wait, shouldn't you be able to do. I did the other day.

  I followed, flashing head and movement of the arm in 3 record tracks different without problem!

• Workflow for specific products/catalogues

  Hi people. I use BC to a customer for over a year now. Online store has been produced all downloadable, so it worked pretty much on autopilot and all customers had to worry about was it supply new content on a regular basis, which was the issue of the use of BC. Problem is the client now wants to introduce one or two products that need to be delivered physically and she must be organized manually.

  My plan was to implement a workflow that automatically sends the customer whenever one of these products is bought. The problem is, I can't seem to find a way to attach a workflow to a specific product in the catalogue. The only option seems to be to set up a workflow for all orders, which means that the customer receives hundreds of emails about download purchases that she didn't need. Of course, you then run the risk of missing a manual delivery e-mail in among others. Clearly I'm missing something obvious (again). Can someone help me?

  In short, how can I get a notification if someone buys A product, but not if they buy products B, C, D, E...?

  Oh man that is rude. I really don't think there is a way to manage the workflow based on a catalogue/product in particular.

  However what we can do is set up your customer in the CRM, and then use drop shipping to warn when a physical product is purchased.

  inside, it is a notice of workflow, just a little less dynamic.

  Catalyst for help | Implement a drop shipping

• For Web use color management

  I'm sorry if this has been posted elsewhere, but I was unable to find it. It's a bit hard to find when I don't know exactly how to explain the problem.

  My problem is that I see too much difference between the images in Photoshop and the same file in web browsers. The problem seems to double. The shadows of images are appearing where blotchy, as it appears in photoshop. This is especially true in the pictures with a lot of digital noise like a digital photograph shot at high ISO. The second problem is that images appear much more contrasting in web browsers than in photoshop. This is particularly noticeable monochrome images of high contrast in photoshop as the web browser pushes the contrast levels in the Kingdom of clipping and burn.

  I'll explain my material and the workflow so that you can get an idea where the problem might be. I shoot a Canon 20 d. I am running Windows 7 64 bit with a Benq 21 '' LED monitor. RAW conversion in Digital Photo Professional (although I have transformed my raw files in Photoshop for troubleshooting reasons and had the same problems). I convert my raw to tiff 8-bit files and open in Photoshop CS5 (also troubleshooted in CS3 with the same results) for the majority of my editing before converting small JPEG for web use where they are displayed in the current version of Firefox.

  The final jpeg always look great in Photoshop, but as soon as I open them in Firefox or one of Windows Photo Viewer they look terrible. I do not understand that Photoshop displays the ICC profile image where that most web browsers don't not/can not. That's why I convert my JPEG files in sRGB (I normally shoot in AdobeRGB) I was under the impression that an application not CM as a web browser would show everything in sRGB as is the internet standard. So what I see in Photoshop while displaying a picture listed for sRGB should be the same as in an environment not CM surely? For reasons of test I tried to process the unidentified images, but the same questions always came.

  Unfortunately my monitor is not shaped as I can't currently afford equipment. Back when I was in uni, we used Spyder, but it's just out of my means. Even though I think most of the people might be inclined to this blame on the lack of monitor profiling, I have my doubts. My problems are rarely found in different colors. I even experimented with changing the gamma settings while having one of the images open in Firefox. No gamma level, no matter how extreme, makes a lot of difference to the blotchyness of my shadow. Not only that, but profiling seems to aim at the synergy between the screen and print. I don't know how it could help bridge the gap between software.

  My wife has the exact same pc than me and even monitor (although hers is LCD and LED mine) and the same problems exist when it displays images. I noticed the images look good on my laptop on Firefox. This makes me wonder if the modern LCD monitors General contrast and brightness levels bring the problems I didn't know I had when editing on a laptop (I had to move countries and that's all I had unfortunately). What worries me is any image on that I have to work hard will always terrible look on the web for someone of another look at one of my images on a modern monitor. Really, I rely on the use of the web to get my content out there. Right now, they are actually more urgent for me to get the prints to the right. If people cannot take advantage of the image on the screen, they will never want to print.

  I hope it was the right place to post such a thing. This is clearly not for the lack of Photoshop that it manages to display more information than the other pieces of software in my images. I just thought that others may have had similar experiences. I'm not professional when it comes to Photoshop or photography, but I have a good few years of experience and education behind me in the topic. It seems I've reached the limit of what I can do here. It actually feels kind of pathetic for something as simple as to a jpeg of an image of high quality for the web allows only to stumble and fall.

  I find myself baffled and confused. I welcome any help on the subject and I thank you all in advance.

  Where do you have a v4 profile in this string?

  Anyway this is much like a monitor profile problem. What are you helping? He is the one that is provided by Benq (which I wouldn't trust for a second), or the default sRGB to Windows? You can find in Control Panel > color management. If this is the swap of profile of Benq for sRGB and working with it until you can afford a calibrator (you can get one for just $90 BTW).

  Normally there will be no difference between Photoshop and Firefox because they are both fully color managed and handled the same way: the document profile is converted on the monitor profile on the fly, and that is what is sent to the screen. But Firefox is known for interpreter sometimes hurt the monitor profile.

  You should also know that if your document profile is the same as your monitor profile (for example, they are the two sRGB), you basically have a managed without color string. So all appear identically with this configuration, Photoshop, Firefox, IE, no matter.

• Workflow for the external Site visitor?

  I'm trying to find out what workflow is used when someone visits the external website AND begins its application process. I'm not able to locate the correct workflow.
  
  Thank you, Al

  Unlike SSHRC, iRecruitment don't use workflow for all its transactions. Specifically, iRecruitment uses workflows for the following operations:

  * Offers (sending, outfit and applicant responses) - IRCOFFERWF
  * Vacancies (new and edit)-IRCWF
  * Registration ex-employee (IRCREGWF)

  I don't think that iRecruitment has a workflow for internal or external from the application process, although I think that there is a "workflow" OTA for any applicant who assessment during their application process.

• Check the workflow for 11.5.8

  Hello
  
  We need to know if there any way to validate the workflow (working or not) without using the Application on Oracle Financials 11i Manager (11.5.8).
  
  Our instance of Test OAM is not working properly because there is a JSP error. But we need to test the functionality of workflow for the approval of bills.
  
  At the moment we do not have the functionality of workflow in production, that it is the first time, it must be tested.
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  Please refer to this document.

  Note: 378281.1 - How does one check that the sender of the Notification does not work properly?
  https://metalink2.Oracle.com/MetaLink/PLSQL/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=not&P_ID=378281.1

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• What is reasonable memory for Firefox use?

  Title says it all-

  What is reasonable memory for Firefox use?

  The normal use, I am an average of 1.2 G or about memory (of 16 G total); is this normal? Don't not maxing out at all but I was wondering.

  How to define and measure the use of memory for Firefox? Activity monitor? I use Firefox to write this. In the activity monitor, I see Firefox to 347 MB and Firefox Web Content to 259 MB.

• which computer is best for home use, including reports and spreadsheets?

  I've been using 'other' computer for many years at work and at home, had an iPhone several years ago and at the insistence of my daughter to Apple computer, I explore the possibility of buying an Apple computer. I need to type reports and do worksheets as a Secretary for an organization. I used Microsoft Office Word and Excel and need something similar, but without all the bugs and viruses. My laptop crashed a few days ago and I lost all the data and applications. Instead of the tedious task of restore all applications, this seems to be the time of the Apple store. Any suggestions? Mac, iPad, or do you use?

  caytn,

  I suggest to start by looking at your budget.  Knowing how much you can spend on a machine will considerably reduce the options.

  I expect that the options will be one of the following:

  MOBILE NO:

  Mac Mini: $500-$2200

  iMac: $1100 - $2400

  PORTABLE:

  MacBook: $1300-$1600

  MacBookPro: $1300-$2700

  I, personally, do NOT recommend an iPad for professional use