wrv210 IGMP
Hi all
Wrv210 router supports "Proxy IGMP"? ".
What block Multicast is disabled on the firewall > general page, Proxy IGMP is enabled on WRV210.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Dear Sir.
How can I enable IGMP for WIN XP as a host in the network.
Now, I can't see a registory this Protocol in the tcp/ip settings.
Thank you
Manijeh
Hello
Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the public on the TechNet site. Please post your question in the below link: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/categories
-
None of the applications and games for Wrv210 router
I just got a new WRV210 router yesterday. The wireless and everything works fine but I need to host again on Warcraft 3. On my last router it was easy, I just went to 192.168.1.1 and volla applications and games link was on top. On this new router it not yet displayed. I searched for this answer for about 4 hours and im about to give up. Please help if possible it is really frustrating me.
As I remember, the model number of your router falls under the devices of the series of cases. I also believe that there are different web interface. If you are looking for port forwarding to allow you to open the ports for your games, you can access the user interface and then go to the Firewall tab, then select Port Forwarding (secondary tab). It works as an Application and games for the regular Linksys router.
-
Redirect Port WRV210 not open ports
Greetings,
I have a Linksys/Cisco WRV210 Wireless-G VPN Router with RangeBooster. ISP is a dynamic IP with all ports open. I have no equipment to interact with them. they give me just a CAT5 cable on the wall. ISP-> WRV210-> LAN
Router stats
Hardware Version: WRTR-221G_V1
Software version: 2.0.0.11
Connection type: Automatic Configuration - DHCP
IP address: 10.1.222.104
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Default gateway: 10.1.222.1
Port Forwarding 22152 - 22152 192.168.1.152 enabled
No trigger port
DMZ disabled
If I am controlled within the local network
nmap -p22152 192.168.1.152Interesting ports on 192.168.1.152:PORT STATE SERVICE22152/tcp open unknown
If I am controlled from outside the router (xxx and # are just my changes of masking)
nmap -p22152 desktop.dns.xxx Interesting ports on ##.###.##.###: PORT STATE SERVICE 22152/tcp closed unknown
If I am controlled from inside the LAN on the router
nmap -p22152 192.168.1.1 Interesting ports on 192.168.1.1: PORT STATE SERVICE 22152/tcp closed unknown
It seems that the router is completely ignoring my Port Forwarding instructions. I have the hard reset of the router. I've upgraded to the latest firmware. None of them has made a difference.
My final test was to see if all ports are open on the router
nmap 192.168.1.1 Interesting ports on 192.168.1.1: Not shown: 997 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http 443/tcp open https 60443/tcp open unknown
My questikon would be if someone has a 'trick' to enable port forwarding on the road?
Thank you.
This product is managed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.
For future discussions about this product, go here.
-
Multicast IGMP Server Windows NLB rely on PowerConnect 2824
Our Cisco SG300-10 switch is not compatible with windows NLB multicast because it does not allow to add 0100.5e7f.c801 or 03bf.0ada.c801 multicast MAC addresses to ARP
Dell PowerConnect 2824 (and 2808) reference works with windows NLB multicast (IGMP multicast preference)?
Much of Dell switches support NLB in unicast mode only and NOT in multicast mode. Dell Networking Force10 switches generally support the NLB multicast mode.
Hope this info helps.
-
Hello
I have 2 N4032F in a stack.
The switches are for a VSAN cluster.
I want to enable IGMP snooping so I can use them for a 2nd VSAN cluster (in one VLAN different).
At the moment I have not put up to no matter what VLAN for the current cluster uses the native VLAN 1.
What are appropriate measures that I have to do to enable IGMP with minimum downtime?
Thank you
The best place to start is page 449 of the cli guide. It details the commands to enable IGMP snooping, and what is each order.
Dell.to/1KxGn74
Here is an example of allow the IGMP.
Console (config) # ip igmp snooping
Console (config) # interface vlan 2
Console (Config-if-VLAN2) # ip igmp snooping
IGMP snooping is enabled, but there are still other parameters that can be put in place and are dealt with in the section the guide IGMP snooping.
Once Setup you can use the following command to check the status of monitoring IGMP cuerrent.
Console (config) #show ip igmp snooping
See you soon
-
N3000 (6.1.1.7) issue igmp snooping
G ' Day!
I am setting up a new N3048P switch and having a weird problem with multicast packets invaded to all ports in the Vlan ONLY when there is no one joined in this multicast group, IE. shows "show ip igmp snooping group' the table is empty"there are currently no entries in the table."
If there is one or more hosts who have joined the multicast group that the IGMP Snooping works as expected - no flooding - multicasts packets arrive only on interfaces where the hosts 'asked' for it and in the IGMP Snooping table according to the output of the command 'show ip igmp snooping group'.
Anyone seen this before? Is this a normal behavior?
After the reading of the bible (tools.ietf.org/.../rfc4541) it comes to the behaviour expected of an 'unregistered package' in accordance with paragraph 3, of tools.ietf.org/.../rfc4541
-
Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs
Hello
I have the following scenario:
A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)
A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)
Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.
We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.
Resources work very well, but internet does not work.
We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..
We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:
192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal
192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210
We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)
What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?
Hi Willy,.
You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.
Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....
"But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.
Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.
.
A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.
So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...
If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers. A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html
But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default. I hope that I read your question correctly
Best regards, Dave
-
Connect the WRV210 router to the Internet
I'm trying to connect a new Cisco WRV210 router to the Internet via a D-Link (yes I know - you have to work with what you have) Ethernet Modem ADSL2 + DSL-320 b and can't seem to get a connection. All ideas welcome.
Thank you
should be in the SCOPE of the looks of the manual networking
FTP://FTP.Dlink.co.UK/dsl_routers_modems/DSL-320b/DSL-320b_manual.PDF
Section 3 page mode Bridged 24
-
Multicast traffic stops flowing after a while when using IGMP snooping
Hi all
I have the following configuration:
:
Where host 1 is a multicast traffic source and host 2 is a customer of multicast traffic. IGMP snooping is configured on both switches.
Host 2 boots and sends an IGMP report, in order to join the multicast host group 1. Given that SW2 does not know where the mrouter from the group, adds port Eth1/1 to the Group of snooping and removes the package, the IGMP packet. Once host 1 starts, it sends an IGMP query (which is flooded by the port channel), and multicast traffic starts to flow to host 2.
When I ran 'show ip Mattia snooping groups' I've seen the same result on both switches: on the two switches of the groups the Eth1/1 and the channel port, but after a while, the switch connected to the host 2 deleted the channel of the port of the group.
After consultation with the switch logs and sniff traffic on one of the channel port on SW1 interfaces, I came to the conclusion that happens since SW1 ceases to send queries generated by host 1 and responding to them locally (some proxy or something). I also noticed that IGMP reports generated by host 2 stop arriving on SW1 (since SW2 do not know that there a connected mrouter more across the channel of the port).My questions are:
1. How does SW1 knows he should keep the channel port as part of the group, if it does not IGMP reports coming from SW2 more?
2. what happens if the host 2 is not interested in multicast traffic, but do not send and IGMP leave message (a behavior that is supported according to the Protocol, to my knowledge)? How SW1 knows he should cease to IGMP sent from host 1 query response?
Thanks in advance,
Omer.
Hello
The problem is because you have not mrouter port sw1. It is well documented by virtue
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-6500-Series-...
There are 3 ways you can solve this problem.
1. enable Pim on Sw1.
Or
2. enable ip igmp snooping interrogator on Sw2
Or
3. create staitc mrouter port on sw2.
ip igmp snooping vlan 1 mrouter interface PoX
-
I have a Site 2 Site VPN set up from my office to my home. One of my applications use multicasting to communicate with a server on the other side of the VPN. Is there anyway that I can enable IGMP on my VPN connection?
In the Direct Encapsulation IPSec IPSec does not support multicast
In order to obtain the multicast enabled on VPN, you must use the GRE
Please visit for more information:
http://www.Cisco.com/application/PDF/en/us/guest/NetSol/ns171/c649/ccmigration_09186a008074f26a.PDF
M.
Hope that helps the rate if it isn't
-
VXLAN on UCS: IGMP with Catalyst 3750, 5548 Nexus, Nexus 1000V
Hello team,
My lab consists of Catalyst 3750 with SVI acting as the router, 5548 Nexus in the vpc Setup, UCS in end-host Mode and Nexus 1000V with segmentation feature enabled (VXLAN).
I have two different VLAN for VXLAN (140, 141) to demonstrate connectivity across the L3.
VMKernel on VLAN 140 guests join the multicast fine group.
Hosts with VMKernel on 141 VLAN do not join the multicast group. Then, VMs on these hosts cannot virtual computers ping hosts on the local network VIRTUAL 140, and they can't even ping each other.
I turned on debug ip igmp on the L3 Switch, and the result indicates a timeout when he is waiting for a report from 141 VLAN:
15 Oct 08:57:34.201: IGMP (0): send requests General v2 on Vlan140
15 Oct 08:57:34.201: IGMP (0): set the report interval to 3.6 seconds for 224.0.1.40 on Vlan140
15 Oct 08:57:36.886: IGMP (0): receipt v2 report on 172.16.66.2 to 239.1.1.1 Vlan140
15 Oct 08:57:36.886: IGMP (0): group record received for group 239.1.1.1, mode 2 from 172.16.66.2 to 0 sources
15 Oct 08:57:36.886: IGMP (0): update EXCLUDE group 239.1.1.1 timer
15 Oct 08:57:36.886: IGMP (0): add/update Vlan140 MRT for (*, 239.1.1.1) 0
15 Oct 08:57:38.270: IGMP (0): send report v2 for 224.0.1.40 on Vlan140
15 Oct 08:57:38.270: IGMP (0): receipt v2 report on Vlan140 of 172.16.66.1 for 224.0.1.40
15 Oct 08:57:38.270: IGMP (0): group record received for group 224.0.1.40, mode 2 from 172.16.66.1 to 0 sources
15 Oct 08:57:38.270: IGMP (0): update EXCLUDE timer group for 224.0.1.40
15 Oct 08:57:38.270: IGMP (0): add/update Vlan140 MRT for (*, 224.0.1.40) by 0
15 Oct 08:57:51.464: IGMP (0): send requests General v2 on Vlan141<----- it="" just="" hangs="" here="" until="" timeout="" and="" goes="" back="" to="">
15 Oct 08:58:35.107: IGMP (0): send requests General v2 on Vlan140
15 Oct 08:58:35.107: IGMP (0): set the report interval to 0.3 seconds for 224.0.1.40 on Vlan140
15 Oct 08:58:35.686: IGMP (0): receipt v2 report on 172.16.66.2 to 239.1.1.1 Vlan140
15 Oct 08:58:35.686: IGMP (0): group record received for group 239.1.1.1, mode 2 from 172.16.66.2 to 0 sources
15 Oct 08:58:35.686: IGMP (0): update EXCLUDE group 239.1.1.1 timer
15 Oct 08:58:35.686: IGMP (0): add/update Vlan140 MRT for (*, 239.1.1.1) 0
If I do a show ip igmp interface, I get the report that there is no joins for vlan 141:
Vlan140 is up, line protocol is up
The Internet address is 172.16.66.1/26
IGMP is enabled on the interface
Current version of IGMP host is 2
Current version of IGMP router is 2
The IGMP query interval is 60 seconds
Configured IGMP queries interval is 60 seconds
IGMP querier timeout is 120 seconds
Configured IGMP querier timeout is 120 seconds
Query response time is 10 seconds max IGMP
Number of queries last member is 2
Last member query response interval is 1000 ms
Access group incoming IGMP is not defined
IGMP activity: 2 joints, 0 leaves
Multicast routing is enabled on the interface
Threshold multicast TTL is 0
Multicast designated router (DR) is 172.16.66.1 (this system)
IGMP querying router is 172.16.66.1 (this system)
Multicast groups joined by this system (number of users):
224.0.1.40 (1)
Vlan141 is up, line protocol is up
The Internet address is 172.16.66.65/26
IGMP is enabled on the interface
Current version of IGMP host is 2
Current version of IGMP router is 2
The IGMP query interval is 60 seconds
Configured IGMP queries interval is 60 seconds
IGMP querier timeout is 120 seconds
Configured IGMP querier timeout is 120 seconds
Query response time is 10 seconds max IGMP
Number of queries last member is 2
Last member query response interval is 1000 ms
Access group incoming IGMP is not defined
IGMP activity: 0 joins, 0 leaves
Multicast routing is enabled on the interface
Threshold multicast TTL is 0
Multicast designated router (DR) is 172.16.66.65 (this system)
IGMP querying router is 172.16.66.65 (this system)
No group multicast joined by this system
Is there a way to check why the hosts on 141 VLAN are joined not successfully? port-profile on the 1000V configuration of vlan 140 and vlan 141 rising and vmkernel are identical, except for the different numbers vlan.
Thank you
Trevor
Hi Trevor,
Once the quick thing to check would be the config igmp for both VLAN.
where did you configure the interrogator for the vlan 140 and 141?
are there changes in transport VXLAN crossing routers? If so you would need routing multicast enabled.
Thank you!
. / Afonso
-
Setup VPN on WRV210 as second router
I'm trying to set up a network containing two routers, a primary giving me access to internet ADSL (a 3CRWDR101A-75 3com) and a secondary router which has VPN (Cisco WRV210).
The main router has the following parameters of LAN: 192.168.0.1 / 255.255.255.0 with active DHCP.
WRV210 has the following parameters of LAN: 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0 with active DHCP.
The cable connection is LAN port of the first router to second router Internet port.
In this way, I'm able to get the Internet on 2 laptops connected to WRV210
I also have a Panasonic IP/PBX connected on the second language (WRV210)
I need to configure VPN on WRV210 to be able to get SIP calls outside the local network (via internet).
As I am a novice in networks, both routers are the DEFAULT setting.
I learned a lot during the last 7 days can understand the concepts of network management, but was unable to put in place the appropriate configuration.
For example if I change WRV210 router mode gateway mode, I won't be able to surf the internet despite the assistance that says "the mode in which this router will work. If this router is hosted your connection of networks to the Internet, select gateway. If another router exists on your network, select route. When the router is selected, dynamic routing is enabled'
Also I am able to ping the LAN 192.168.0.x WRV210 first but not on the other side (from primary router WRV210).
I am confused to use and combine different settings (NAT, routing, Ports,...)
I really appreciate if someone could provide a step by step to configure the appropriate network and be able to reach my IP - PBX on the second language of anywhere.
Thank you
Hi, Ghassan, port forwarding must be configured on the WRV210 router. The 3com device is basically a non-facteurs. If you need assistance with the creation of port forwarding, please call the small business assistance Center.
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful -
RV110W replaces WRV210. IPsec VPN tunnel between them?
I have a VPN between two locations using WRV210s at the end of work. Now, I want to replace a 210 with a new RV110W. Can I get both to work together? The config is quite different.
Rod, the rv110w must be on the latest version of the software. The original version firmware did not support site to site vpn.
Site of the tunnel to the other, simply to match the parameters. If you need help with this, you can call the support center, make sure you have access to the pages of each router configuration.
-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages -
I have read these forums and noticed that many people have problems with multicast configuration. Basically, problems are bandwidth floods, no interrogator, confusing the router pim configuration...
In addition, ive seen some promisses of technical stuff that next gen linksys switches will have #ip igmp snooping inquiringly, as cat. so I am interested if anyone can give me the answer.
It's an interesting question for a lot of people who wouldn't be expensive switches chat for this kind of simple use.
Kind regards
David
Hi David,
You have much more options as seen in the GUI, so I though I'd put as simple network together and run you through a validation.
But I guess you have the updated version of the switch SRW224G4P called SRW224G4P-K9-NA.
If you have the old switch what follows is irrelevant for you.
I implemented a simple network diagram showing my simple network topology used during my wee test;
I chose the RV042 as my router from Layer 3 in this network.
It was really to provide DHCP services, but shortly after that all devices have IP addresses, I removed the RV042, becauise, I noticed he was sending IP IGMP General queries. Something that I didn't have in the next test.
I was using a software based multicast Tester, produced by the wonderful people at Twisted Pair Solutions. This software can send or receive multicasts to a defined group, and that correctly meets General IGMP queries. I'll call this software MCT (multicast test).
I got the software MCT on PC C. PC C is connected to the switch 10 port, it sends the multicasts in the switch at a rate of about 10 packages of multicast a second.
I got the software MCT on PC PC a. is plugged into the switch port 1. She is set to receive and count of multicasts from switch
I got B PC connected to the switch port 2. PC B check switch statistics, but do not try to receive multicasts of 3 PC.
I had Setup multicast snooping on VLAN 1 and mark according to the screenshot of GUI.
Note: I had only one vlan on the switch.
In a composite of two screenshots below, you can see that the status between the IGMP queries is enabled.
I removed the RV042 out of the network, because I noticed in an on PC A wireshark capture, the RV042 sent General group queries. I wanted to switch to reprise this role
I waited a few minutes and only displays the igmp activity.
It can be clearly seen in the screenshot below;
- Switch series SG300 sent General queries (2 minutes) of the IP source 172.16.1.100.
- He waited for the general query router mcast, but when none came, 60 seconds later sent it's own general request. Fair enough, he had to assume that a router mcast can send general queries every minute.
Statistics of the switch can be seen below, it showed.
- B PC on the switch port that G2 was not invaded by the multicasts, in other words snooping works;
- Port 10, PC C sends to 2962 of multicast to switch packets.
- Port 1, PC A 2900 receives multicast switch packets
- port 2B, PC is not part of the multicast group 234.55.66.77 and as such is not invaded by the multicasts.
All three PCs are windows based products, and some of the multicasts emanate from these devices.
See the interafce County property
Port InUcastPkts InMcastPkts InBcastPkts InOctets
---------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
gi1 12 9 6 3493
247 237 6 43733 IG2
gi3 0 0 0 0
gi4 0 0 0 0
gi5 0 0 0 0
gi6 0 0 0 0
gi7 0 0 0 0
gi8 0 0 0 0
gi9 0 0 0 0
GI10 26 2962 3 850881
gi11 0 0 0 0
gi12 0 0 0 0
gi13 0 0 0 0
gi14 0 0 0 0
gi15 0 0 0 0
gi16 0 0 0 0
gi17 0 0 0 0
gi18 0 0 0 0
gi19 0 0 0 0
gi20 0 0 0 0
gi21 0 0 0 0
gi22 0 0 0 0
gi23 0 0 0 0
gi24 0 0 0 0
gi25 0 0 0 0
gi26 0 0 0 0
gi27 0 0 0 0
gi28 0 0 0 0
Port OutUcastPkts OutMcastPkts OutBcastPkts OutOctets
---------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Article IG1 13 2900 9 839691
IG2 233 9 90453 343
gi3 0 0 0 0
gi4 0 0 0 0
gi5 0 0 0 0
gi6 0 0 0 0
gi7 0 0 0 0
gi8 0 0 0 0
gi9 0 0 0 0
GI10 24 343 12 47165
gi11 0 0 0 0
gi12 0 0 0 0
gi13 0 0 0 0
gi14 0 0 0 0
gi15 0 0 0 0
gi16 0 0 0 0
gi17 0 0 0 0
gi18 0 0 0 0
gi19 0 0 0 0
gi20 0 0 0 0
gi21 0 0 0 0
gi22 0 0 0 0
gi23 0 0 0 0
gi24 0 0 0 0
gi25 0 0 0 0
gi26 0 0 0 0
gi27 0 0 0 0
gi28 0 0 0 0
If I look at the groups of multicast on switch, it shows that only two ports were involved in the 234.55.66.77 multicast group. This is the correct behavior.
switch4cf17c #sh ip igmp snooping group
Group VLAN Source include Ports Ports Exclude Comp.
Address mode address
---- ------------ ------------ -------------------- -------------------- -----
1 234.55.66.77 * article IG1, gi10 v2
1 239.255.255. * gi1-2,gi10 v2
250
Just to complete the display, here's the CLI command (highlighted) to enable the feature in the interrogator on the switch.
[Kswitch4cf17c #sh run
Bridge multicast filtering
IP igmp snooping
IP igmp snooping vlan 1
applicant ip igmp snooping vlan 1
interface vlan 1
172.16.1.100 IP address 255.255.255.0
output
interface vlan 1
no ip address dhcp
output
hostname switch4cf17c
No complexity of passwords allow
No server snmp Server
The telnet server IP
Hope this helps you and others
Best regards, Dave
Maybe you are looking for
-
Qosmio G20 - XP doesn't see second HARD drive, but the BIOS is
Hello Mylène for the long post - but think if give good info, I poss of correct answer: After the crash of QOSMIO G20... managed to reinstall of XP Recovery DVD-ROM. Immed after, looked at the config with Win Explorer and two hard drives all present
-
A60-743: is it possible to upgrade the DVD/CD-RW combo
Hi, I have a Satellite A60 743 and I need to upgrade the firmware and drivers from the DVD pioneer dvr-k13A and engraver.I can't find the place where, can you help me please?Thank youRiccardo
-
Scaling inside LabVIEW DaqMX task is not being to scale correctly
I'm reading from a physical channel, scaling of this reading and an indicator on the output screen. If I do not fit the channel it will output 3.07 volts (This displays the same Max). Consider the following code. Physically, I use a 1000 psi pressu
-
Update Vista SP1 to SP2 stuck on 0% download
I'm updating Vista SP1 to SP2. The update says "download updates 0%" complete & back no change. I tried to disable the security software. It did not work. I used the tool to update reset. This doesn't work anymore
-
Pavilion 15-P153NM: cannot install Win 64 bit 8 or 8.1 on Pavilion 15-P153NM
Hello. I bought the Pavilion 15-P153NM with FreeDos. BIOS version is f13. I have an installation DVD of Win 8 with release 8.1 on it. I get this message: "Windows cannot be installed to this disk. The selected disk is a MBR partition table. On EFI sy