2000 AD to 2003 AD

Similar Questions

• Cannot install KB979909 and KB979906 for Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP

  Original title: Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 security update for Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 __Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 (KB979909) update for Windows 2000 and Windows XP (KB979906) __KB979909)

  I was warned, I got updates, I clicked on install

  he installed an and failed both

  I can't determine how to solve this problem, and the little shield that warns me still here says I need to update

  the explanation refers to the sp?

  IM unaware of what these elements affect

  See the RESPONSE message in this thread: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vistawu/thread/5dc22ff1-ba9a-4a3a-9f19-49e85908c4c9 ~ Robear Dyer (PA Bear) ~ MS MVP (that is to say, mail, security, Windows & Update Services) since 2002 ~ WARNING: MS MVPs represent or work for Microsoft

• This application can be launched with a version of Microsoft Windows 95 OSR2.1/98/ME/NT 4.0/2000/XP/Server 2003 ONLY

  Silent Hunter 3 and 4 DO NOT recognize Windows 7 (i.e., This application can be launched with a version of Microsoft Windows 95 OSR2.1/98/ME/NT 4.0/2000/XP/Server 2003 ONLY). Help!

  My OS is Windows 7 Pro. and I have quite a few other games and programs that does not work in my 64-bit system

  Hi WolfenOne,

  I tried to check the compatibility of the program with Windows 7 and could not find any information in the Windows 7 Compatibility Center.

  Access the link below to check the compatibility with Windows 7.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-7/en-us/default.aspx

  Step 1

  You can Runprogram("test.html") resolution of compatibility issues in windows 7 and check if it helps. 

  To run the troubleshooting program compatibility troubleshooter, follow these steps:

  1. open the troubleshooting program compatibility Troubleshooter by clicking the Start button, then Control Panel.

  2. in the search box, type "convenience store" (without the quotation marks) and then click Troubleshooting.

  3. in the context of programs , click on run programs for previous versions of Windows.

  4. follow the instructions in the troubleshooting.

  Access the link below to learn more about how to make older programs work in Windows 7.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/make-older-programs-run-in-this-version-of-Windows

  Step 2

  If you are unable to install the program in compatibility mode, you can access the link below and search for information about the installation and execution of programs in XP mode:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/install-and-use-Windows-XP-mode-in-Windows-7#section_1

  I hope this helps. Let us know the results.

  Thank you and best regards,

   

  Srinivas R

  Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Outlook Express 6, Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 print incomplete emails if IE8 is installed.

  The right side of the first page of a printed email from Outlook Express 6, Outlook 2000, or Outlook 2003 is truncated on a computer that is running Windows XP SP3 with Internet Explorer 8 is installed.  E-mails containing tables are specifically affected, but it may be any other emails as well. This problem is easily reproducible on any XP machine running IE8 and any version of outlook prior to 2007. It seems that Microsoft has stopped using the IE from Outlook 2007 print engine. One of these same machines that have this problem, if you uninstall IE8 and go back to IE7, the problem goes away.

  I searched all over the web trying to solve this problem. It seems that there is some workaround solutions, but not a solution for this problem for XP users. Microsoft has released a fix for this EXACT problem for users of Windows Vista and Windows 7. This hotfix will not install on a XP system. The link to the fix is here:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/980333

  There is another thread on this topic in forum windows 7:

  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/InternetExplorer/thread/8c629797-DB1C-470C-92af-015e4ea03110

  The question in this thread has been resolved with the patch that I mentioned above, but when joined XP users, it was recommended that someone start a new thread about this in XP. I did now and am waiting for a response from Microsoft.

  Possible temporary solutions (for those of you are experiencing this problem):

  1 - back to IE7 (I'm not an acceptable solution in the enterprise environment).

  2. after the opening of the email, go to the file and save it as an html file. Open the HTML in ie8 or your favorite browser and print from there.

  3 - the upgrade to Office 2007 or 2010 (if I wanted to spend the money on a new product, I would. However, I refuse to do that simply because an old version, I bought doesn't work anymore.

  Success!

  So, this is a summary of what I've done:

  1 has begun with an installation of XP SP3 updated with IE8 installed. At this point, I have the right margin bug in OE6.
  2. uninstalled the latest update of security for IE8, which to this day is KB2559049. Restarted.
  3. (you may need to perform this step in Mode safe) renamed ieframe.dll in C:\Windows\System32 ieframe.old. Ieframe.dll manually copy the LDR version in the second most recent Cumulative Security Update for IE8, which, as of this writing is KB2530548 in the C:\Windows\System32 folder. That version LDR is located at C:\WINDOWS\$hf_mig$\KB2530548-IE8\SP3QFE and is the version 8.00.6001.23165(longhorn_ie8_ldr.110420-1800). Restarted.
  4. check that the right margin bug is now fixed. Windows Update told me that the most recent Cumulative Security Update for IE8, KB2559049, was now available to the installation, I did. Restarted.
  5. check the ieframe.dll version that is now in my C:\Windows\System32 folder and it is 8.00.6001.23192(longhorn_ie8_ldr.110617-1815) as hoped. Confirmed that the bug of the right margin is always fixed.

  This procedure does 2 things that just copies the LDR latest version updated security in the System32 folder would not prove it with. :

  (A) this shows that manual copy of the dll LDR of security Cumulative Update and then apply the next update will keep the ieframe.dll on the LDR track. There is no need to worry that the next update replace with the MDM (non-hotfix) version.

  (B) there was a bunch of other DLLs that have been on the LDR track when KB2559049 has been reinstalled, it seems that the ieframe.dll LDR can have dependencies on other DLLs being also in the LDR branch, or vice versa. Simply having the LDR ieframe.dll since the 2nd upgrade newer in the System32 folder when you install the latest, due to the most recent update to other dll LDR trace. This includes iepeers.dll, ieproxy.dll, iertutil.dll, c:\windows\system32\msfeeds.dll, wininet.dll, and xpshims.dll (and probably others). Makes me conclude that my method (steps 1-4 above) is greater than the fair copy in the LDR new dll for ieframe.dll, since the other dependant dll LDR manually will be installed using my method.

  Ty Robert Aldwinckle and PA support to help me (even though I disappeared of the thread for more than a year: P)

• SQL 2000 on Windows 2003, which is a physical machine is vSphere6 (P2V) using last Converter?

  Hi all

  I am considering P2V, i.e. 2000 SQL under Windows 2003, in vSphere environment 6. Lastes converter he takes?

  If this is not the case, how can I do? With the help of old converter? I did not before P2V. Your opinion will help a lot.

  Hello

  It seems to work (tested with 6.1.1)

  I would say stop all sql processes before the conversion.

  Reg

  Chris

• Upgrade from Exchange 2000 to 2003

  Hi, can someone tell me if I need to perform an update of more Windows AD Schema on the Windows domain if offbox Exchange Server is upgraded to Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003?

  Why I asked because in the AD schema update program, we just need to choose the same key "Exchange 2000 or 2003 directory Monitor" and there is no difference in the steps to update of Exchange 2000 and Exchange 2003 schema.

  Hope someone can help out me. Thank you.

  See you soon,.

  ---

  Raymond

  You don't need to run update AdSchema.

• UPGRADE WINDOWS 2000, 2003 OR 2008 WITH EBS - 11.5.10.2 AND DB 10 GR 2

  Hello...
  
  We have a new project to start upgrading windows 2000 to 2003 or 2008 (Wich is better). As I would like to know what our options here .all reference will be more useful.
  
  
  I think the cloning option. What do you think?
  
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  
  Kind regards

  Hello

  We have a new project to start upgrading windows 2000 to 2003 or 2008 (Wich is better). As I would like to know what our options here .all reference will be more useful.

  You would need to go with Windows 2003, Windows 2008 is not certified with 11i - see (update on the Installation of Oracle Applications Release 11i (11.5.10.2) [316806.1 ID]) for more details.

  I think the cloning option. What do you think?

  You can use quick Clone to clone the instance of Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 in accordance with the following documentation.

  Documentation fund quick Clone, version 11i and 12 [799735.1 ID]

  Or, you could simply upgrade the operating system directly, and in this case, please make sure that you follow the steps described in these documents.

  Note: 356878.1 - how to recreate a link to all of the Installation Applications 11i
  Note: 407055.1 - process to upgrade the operating system and the Oracle database server

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

  We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

  I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

  a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

  b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

  c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

  Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

  Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

  Thank you

  Keith

• Voice on Exchange 2003 Cluster connector?

  I have a small question regarding to where to install a voice connector.

  We currently have a voice connector installed on a stand-alone server Exchange 2003 (running Windows 2000 Server).

  It is configured to connect to our bridge of unity via VPIM server.

  We want to install the connector on the voice on our Exchange 2003 Cluster (two Exchange servers, running Windows 2003 Server) if possible.

  The problems for me this or not do this? Or is it better to keep it on a stand-alone Exchange Server?

  I don't know since we are talking about two Exchange servers configured in a cluster and there may be additional licenses involved, etc..

  Thank you

  It seems that the implementation of bridge on a cluster is not supported by Microsoft.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/voice_ip_comm/bridge/31/Networking/Guide/31ex_5x/31cubnetex.html

  Implementation of voice for the network bridge connector

  "Install the connector of the votes on any Exchange 2000 or Exchange 2003 server that is not part of an Exchange cluster (Microsoft doesn't support connectors from third on an Exchange cluster server)." Although the voice connector can be installed on the Cisco Unity Server (when Exchange is also on the server), it is not recommended for performance reasons. "

  Please note

• VCB + Windows 2000 and SQL 2000

  Hi guys,.

  I want to know if I take a backup with VCB one of my VM (Windows 2000 + SQL2000) in full mode vm the SQL database will be consistent or not... I know that since ESX 3.5 update 2 VSS support has been improved and should not cause not compatible DB backup... But as my version of OS and SQL are unaware of VSS I would like to know the result of a backup on the DB! Also what about a SQL 2000 on Windows 2003?

  Thanks for your replies

  Concerning

  Julien

  Windows 2000 is not aware of vss.

  SQL2000 is aware of vss.

  Move to Windows 2003 with sql 2000 and you'll be fine.

  Concerning

• < cfdocument > and < cfchart > stopped working when moved to Windows 2003/IIS 6

  We moved just our content to a new server: Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 (IIS6).
  We use Cold Fusion MX 7,0,2,142559.
  
  Everything works fine after moving to the exception:

  
  1. < cfdocument > (no, that more simple) crashes, producing the error: "the document has no pages. NULL.

  
  2. < cfchart > accidents producing error: "an invalid attribute: autoAdjust null.
  
  What can be? Where should we look for? Is it some problem/feature/blocking of Windows 2003? Or it looks like Cold Fusion has not been installed properly?
  Patches are required?

  
  All ideas are welcome!

  I would avoid 7.0.1 installation patches on a 7.0.2 installation.   The 7.0.2 release notes state that "it includes also all previous ColdFusion MX 7 patches that were released to date, eliminating the need to install several hotfixes and patches."

  CF 7.0.2 Release notes
  http://www.Adobe.com/support/documentation/en/ColdFusion/mx702/cf702_releasenotes.html
  
  You can try to install the ColdFusion MX 7.02 Cumulative Hot Fix 3 or the cumulative hotfix CFDocument.
  ColdFusion MX 7.02 Update Rollup 3
  http://kb2.Adobe.com/CPS/402/kb402465.html
  
  ColdFusion MX 7.02 - CFDocument cumulative patch
  http://kb2.Adobe.com/CPS/402/kb402093.html

• RoboHelp 6 and 7 when used on Windows 2003.

  Hello:
  
  I read that the latest version of RoboHelp (RH7) does not work on Windows 2003. See http://www.adobe.com/products/robohelp/productinfo/systemreqs/ for the purposes of OS of RH7. RH7 is certified for Vista, XP and 2000; but not 2003. Isn't that surprising? Anyone know what are the issues using Windows 2003 and RH7?
  
  Surprisingly, the online help for says-RH6 RH6 is certified on OS Windows 2000 SP4 and later Windows 2003 which means must be supported. In this case, why a later version (RH7) drop support for it?
  
  I ask because we are faced with several problems of performance using RH6 on Windows 2003 (we just upgraded from Windows 2000). It takes a long time to do anything in WebHelp (for RH6). Our project is huge and uses Visual SourceSafe for version control. We had no such problems with RH6 on Windows 2000.
  
  Thank you
  Kutra

  Kutra. Do you mean Windows Server 2003? If so, you may not use RH6 or any other version of a server.

• Re: NB100-12: cannot install Windows XP

  I cannot install the operating system to start, for a clean installation, the cd boots and seems to start installation, drivers etc. start loadind
  Then before you get to the point "want install you windows page, an error message appears saying my HARD drive is damaged or has a virus?"

  Any ideas?

  I can't really help, but I see the same problem :( I tried XP, 2000 and server 2003 installation CD. Either I get the same message you saw, or Installer Blue-screens.

  I've seen it suggested elsewhere to change the SATA in the BIOS from AHCI to compatibility, but that does not help either.

  I have to admit, it's as if the Windows Installer has problems see the hard drive, but I don't know what to do about this. Install a different disk drive, maybe?

• Help for personal key on SM30-801

  I've updated my laptop under Windows Server 2003 for the work. But, the personal touch on the right do not work. Where to install the driver on CD during the reboot, an error has occurred, the FN key don't work and the video output for tv do not work. I can fix this bugs. Thank you!

  Hello

  so far, as to know, 2003 Server has not been tested on this machine by Toshiba himself.

  This addon programs often try to start as a system Service.
  Windows 2000 Server or 2003 Server does not accept this.

  I had this problem with Windows 2000 Server on another type of laptop.

  Good bye

• Microsoft updates keep repeating again and again

  I have windows xp sp 3 x 86 and what are the updates that keep repeating

  A security update for .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5 SP1 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB983583)

  Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 Security Update for Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB979909)

  Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 2 update for Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB976569)

  Please help me solve this problem

  .NET framework 3.5 includes the .NET Framework 2.0.

  @alex13542... It seems that the .NET Framework is not properly installed or the installation is corrupted.
  Please see - Update: what to do if the other .NET Framework installation troubleshooting do not help
  Try all the steps starting with the first proposal and work your way up to the last.

  MowGreen Services update - consumer safety