Voice on Exchange 2003 Cluster connector?
I have a small question regarding to where to install a voice connector.
We currently have a voice connector installed on a stand-alone server Exchange 2003 (running Windows 2000 Server).
It is configured to connect to our bridge of unity via VPIM server.
We want to install the connector on the voice on our Exchange 2003 Cluster (two Exchange servers, running Windows 2003 Server) if possible.
The problems for me this or not do this? Or is it better to keep it on a stand-alone Exchange Server?
I don't know since we are talking about two Exchange servers configured in a cluster and there may be additional licenses involved, etc..
Thank you
It seems that the implementation of bridge on a cluster is not supported by Microsoft.
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/voice_ip_comm/bridge/31/Networking/Guide/31ex_5x/31cubnetex.html
Implementation of voice for the network bridge connector
"Install the connector of the votes on any Exchange 2000 or Exchange 2003 server that is not part of an Exchange cluster (Microsoft doesn't support connectors from third on an Exchange cluster server)." Although the voice connector can be installed on the Cisco Unity Server (when Exchange is also on the server), it is not recommended for performance reasons. "
Please note
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Hello
I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise
Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter
I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?
Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me
Kind regards
Patricia
Hello SwapnilJain27,
It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.
You can find the category that fits your question below:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServerThank you!
-
Cluster Exchange 2003 on ESX4i on one physical host, use local storage
I'm trying to implement a 2 node Exchange 2003 on a physical ESX4i cluster use local storage. I have 2 network cards, assigned drives to be on a different SCSI controller, when I set up the first node of the cluster, I am not able to select the disc that I put in place for the Quorum, it will only install on the C drive, which is the OS disc. What should I do to be able to use the shared disks configured for the cluster.
So, once the scan is complete you should have a section called "Quorum resource Detection", is there something there? By default, Windows attempts to use the smallest available partition that is not the system partition, which is larger than 500 MB and a shared bus. This last point is key, see photo. It's the only thing I can think of for that is why you wouldn't see the quorum...
-alex
-
Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003
We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).
I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:
a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?
b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?
c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous
Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.
Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.
Thank you
Keith
-
Exchange 2003 FrontEnd Server Down, Bank of messages of the unit down.
Hello
The configuration of the Exchange 2003 environment with 1 Server frontend and backend (cluster) 2 servers. The Exchange FrontEnd server is down due to the problem of relay service. All outlook and exchange related services clients are point directly to the server main exchange. This cause of unity is unable to store voice messages in the exchange store. When subscribers call for unity, system will tell the Bank to the user messages are temporary offline. How re - configure the unit to make it appear the message store? Below is the version of the unit.
Cisco Unity Version 4.0
Build number 4.0 (3) SR 1
Windows Server Version Microsoft Windows 2000 version 2195 (Service Pack 3)
Pls advise.
Thanking in advance for your help.
The guide of reconfiguration:
Thank you
Keith
-
4.1 unit. (1) and Exchange 2003 SP2
Is the unit 4.1. (1) and Exchange 2003 SP2 is supported, I'm planning on the upgrade of the existing unit 4.0.5 to 4.1. (1) at - it no cisco Documentation on this subject?
Mrugresh,
SP2 is listed on the recommended cisco page updated, at the following location.
http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/voice/c_unity/cmptblty/msupdate.htm
* Please note the useful answers
-
Exchange 2007 Cluster CSC - P2V
We are currently running two physical servers to Exchange 2007 in a SCC cluster. The Exchange mailbox DB are housed on a LUN in a SAN EMC. Currently, the two physical servers have access to the LUN, but only the active node of SCC will go up the disks.
We would like to P2V servers on our farm in VMWare (ESX and vSphere 4). The SCC cluster has too many pieces attached to it (certificates, Outlook clients connect on behalf of the cluster, etc.) so we don't want to set up a new server and then migrate the data. Are there special aspects we need to know? Most of the documentation I've found is CCR and SCC No.
In the past, we ran into issues when more than WIndows servers had access to a SAN logical unit number. In fact, this caused the corruption of our Exchange 2007 databases when firstly, we migrated from Exchange 2003 to 2007. We will encounter this problem even if our ESX farm all have access to this LUN? This is necessary because we also run vMotion.
Thank you.
Yes, the new virtual machine will be the 3rd member of cluster, not the server of the mailbox 3rd (just to be clear). In order for this virtual machine be eligible, you need to make data visible LUNS per ESX host. Once added to the cluster, you will be able to move the EVS (your mailbox server resources) for the virtual machine (3rd member of the cluster). Note, all in are not normally the case, I've seen a situation when the VM could not meet the disks shared online. To fix this I had to turn off the physical host computers having locks on shared disks. Once I turned off the physical nodes I could put the Exchange virtual server online and then put on the physical nodes and freely moving resources between nodes.
If you look at the guide I linked in the previous post, you will see the section that describes the parameters to create a cluster of physical to virtual. Once the virtual is online and you have confirmed that the Exchange virtual server can freely migrate from the physical to the virtual nodes you can expel one of the physical nodes. You can then set up a second virtual machine and add it to the cluster. Once you have verified that the Exchange virtual server can migrate freely between the two virtual nodes you can then remove the remaining physical node and you end up with a virtual two-node cluster. Also, note that you cannot have two nodes in a cluster failover windows running on vSphere.
I hope this helps.
-alex
-
Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange
Hello
I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time
the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.
Server - SBS2003
Customers - Office 2007 and 2010
Thank you
Ty
Hello
Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.
I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver
And here:
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy
See you soon.
-
Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO
Hi all
Merry Christmas to start!
I work for a company that run Exchange 2003. We plan to do a migration to Office365 and I am researching on the best solution.
I am aware that there are three main options available, hybrid/intermediary/putting in service.
My instincts suggest that the best option would be to complete the migration using the staging process, but I think that if I take this route I can't implement single sign on? This is the case...
If so, is this means to ensure single sign-on can be used, then I can only implement a hybrid solution?
Hello
And a Merry Christmas to you, too.
Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.
Please repost your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy
See you soon.
-
SBS 2003 migrating exchange 2003 to exchange 2010
Hello
It is possible o migrate from exchange 2003 on SBS 2003 to new windows server 2012 STD with exchange 2010, but does not move the FSMO rules to windows 2012? I can't downgrade SBS 2003 because I have an application that cannot be migrated from Small Business SERVER 2003.
Best regards
Marcio Moreira
Try asking in Exchange Server Forums:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=exchangeserve -
Nice day
3 months ago I installed Exchange Server 2010, now I need to recover a mailbox from a backup. The backup was performed while he was still Exchange 2003. I want to know is you can restore an old Exchange 2003 database in the Exchange 2010 recovery store, and if so what is the way forward. PS I use symantec backup exec 2010 R3 as backup software.
If it is not possible, is there any other way to retrieve mailbox information
Any help will be much appreciated.
Hello Wh@pd@p,
I suggest posting your question on our forums TechNet for Microsoft Exchange Server, located here again: -
How to switch my domain server 2003 & exchange 2003 Server
I have Windows 2003 Server domain with exchange 2003 server running on the same machine, I want to improve my server domain to Windows server 2008, both my exchange to Exchange Server 2007 server, tell me the procedure, if I upgrade my server exchange server or domain first. What are the steps to do this.
Support is located in the Windows Server Forums:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/Support is found in the Exchange Server forums:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/ -
SQL Server 2005 unattended install using the script fails on Windows 2003 Cluster
We strive to perform the installation without SQL Server 2005 via the script assistance, but the installation fails on Windows 2003 Cluster, we use Windows 2008 with HyperV running a DC with two nodes (all Win 2003). Script is...
Start/wait setup.exe/qb VS = INSTALLVS SQLTEST = SQL_Engine INSTANCENAME = SQL123 ADDLOCAL = SQL_Engine ADDNODE = sqlnode-1, sqlnode-2 GROUP = SQL1 IP = 192.168.1.85, SQLNetwork ADMINPASSWORD = Windows8! SAPWD = Windows8! INSTALLSQLDIR=%ProgramFiles%\Microsoft SQL Server\ INSTALLSQLDATADIR = G:\SQLDATADIR\ SQLACCOUNT = SQLPASSWORD lab\sql_svc = Windows8! AGTACCOUNT = lab\sql_svc = Windows8 AGTPASSWORD! SQLBROWSERACCOUNT = SQLBROWSERPASSWORD = Windows8 lab\sql_svc! SQLCLUSTERGROUP = "lab\sql_grp" AGTCLUSTERGROUP = "lab\sql_grp" FTSCLUSTERGROUP = "lab\sql_grp" ERRORREPORTING = 1 SQMREPORTING = 1 SQLCOLLATION = SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
Errors on the nodes:
SQLSetup0008_SQLNODE1_Core (Local)
Running: InstallSqlAction to the: 4/14/2012 22:56:39
Installation: sql on target: SQLNODE1
Waiting for remote setup (s) to prepare
Remote Setup (s) is ready
Problem of determining the State of the virtual server for the package: '1' because of the exception of data store:
Source the name of the file: datastore\cachedpropertycollection.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Fri 29 Jul 01:13:49 2005
Function name: CachedPropertyCollection::findProperty
The source line number: 63
----------------------------------------------------------
Could not find the property 'VsDataPath' {'PackageIdStateScope', ' ', '1'} in the cache.
Source the name of the file: datastore\packageidstatescopecollector.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Wed Aug 24 13:40:04 2005
Function name: PackageIdStateScopeCollector::collectProperty
The source line number: 115
----------------------------------------------------------
dataPathValue is empty
Cluster functionality detected: SQL_Engine
Loaded DLL:C:\Program SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\sqlsval.dll Version: 2005.90.1399.0
Source the name of the file: datastore\cachedpropertycollection.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Fri 29 Jul 01:13:49 2005
Function name: CachedPropertyCollection::findProperty
The source line number: 130
----------------------------------------------------------
Unable to find property 'IPResources' {"VirtualServerInfo", "", "SQLTEST"} in the cache
Source the name of the file: datastore\cachedpropertycollection.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Fri 29 Jul 01:13:49 2005
Function name: VirtualServerInfo.IPResources
The source line number: 113
----------------------------------------------------------
Could not collect the property 'IPResources' {"VirtualServerInfo", "", "SQLTEST"}
Transact package threw an exception.
Error code: 0x8007000d (13)
Windows error text: these data are incorrect.
Source the name of the file: sqlchaining\highlyavailablepackage.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Mon Aug 29 01:18:42 2005
Function name: sqls::HighlyAvailablePackage:manageVsResources
The source line number: 490
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
SQLs::HighlyAvailablePackage:preInstall
SQLs::HighlyAvailablePackage:manageVsResources
m_dataDirPath is empty
Cluster API threw an exception during operations of virtualization.
Package first notify: 13
Error code: 0x8007000d (13)
Windows error text: these data are incorrect.
Source the name of the file: sqlchaining\highlyavailablepackage.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Mon Aug 29 01:18:42 2005
Function name: sqls::HighlyAvailablePackage:manageVsResources
The source line number: 490
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
SQLs::HighlyAvailablePackage:preInstall
SQLs::HighlyAvailablePackage:manageVsResources
m_dataDirPath is empty
Cluster API threw an exception during operations of virtualization.
SQLSetup0008_SQLNODE2_Core (Local)
Local configuration can complement
Running: InstallSqlAction at: 4/2012/14 23:23:57
Installation: sql on target: SQLNODE2
Informs the package is ready to start: 0
Waiting for notification start installation
Local configuration can begin installation
Error code: 0x8007000d (13)
Windows error text: these data are incorrect.
Source the name of the file: remotepackageengine\remotepackageinstallersynch.cpp
Compiler timestamp: Wed Aug 24 13:40:17 2005
Function name: sqls::RemotePackageInstallerSynch:preInstall
The source line number: 128
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
SQLs::InstallPackageAction: perform
SQLs::RemotePackageInstallerSynch:preInstall
Abandonment of the package: "sql", due to an error from the configuration of the host: 13
Notify all ready to commit: 13
Notify all ready to put end to: 13
Waiting for notification complete installation
Local configuration can complement
Packaging return code: 13
Complete: InstallSqlAction at: 4/2012/14 23:23:59, returned false
Error: The 'InstallSqlAction' Action failed during execution. Error during execution information:
Target collection includes the local machine.
-----------------------------------------------
Error: The 'UninstallForRS2000Action' Action failed during execution. Error during execution information:
Action: "UninstallForRS2000Action" will be marked as failed due to the following condition:
The condition 'rs has been correctly upgraded level.' returned false.
Package installation: 'patchRS2000' failed due to a precondition.
Running: ReportChainingResults at: 4/2012/14 23:24:1
Error: Action "ReportChainingResults" threw an exception during execution.
One or more packages could not be installed. See logs for details of the error. : 13
Error code: 0x8007000d (13)
Windows error text: these data are incorrect.
Source the name of the file: sqlchaining\sqlchainingactions.cpp
Compiler timestamp: 1 Thu Sep 22:23:05 2005
Name of the function: sqls::ReportChainingResults: perform
The source line number: 3097
Please notify.
Assani
Hello
The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums. You can follow the link to your question:
http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/WindowsServer/bb512923
Hope this information helps.
-
Hello Sir,
I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.
At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...
I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder. At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection). I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.
Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking. By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay. I checked for this and I have been clean. I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet. Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net? I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected. How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD. I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere. Help! There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!
TKS and best regards,
LT
Hi Lennet,
Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:
Hope the helps of information.
-
Exchange 2003 migration to Exchange 2010
Dear Sir/Madam
I have a partner who has a parent and a child domain, it has exchange 2003 is installed in the child domain.
He wonders if he can install exchange 2010 in the partner area & migrate all the exchange 2003 from the child domain in the newly installed exchange 2010 in the area of the partner.
Please repost your request in one of the most appropriate Microsoft Exchange Forums. Thank you!
Maybe you are looking for
-
Choose the paper pictures of (my) desktop wallpaper in macOS Sierra
With the update for Sierra, I apparently lost the photos as wallpaper, I would put on my different offices. When I go to system preferences / desktop and screen saver / Desktop, I see the line 'Photos' on the menu, but if I choose that, nothing else
-
Because I decided to go back to Mac Mail (under El Capitan) of Outlook 2011 and Mail is to be a nightmare. I don't import anything, but rather redownloaded all my messages in my Inbox, and then recreated my structure of folders and rules to obtain qu
-
Is Lenove t410 (2537PW4) has Bluetooth?
Hello guysI'm a new user here and lenovo new tooI bought a computer laptop lenovo t410 (2537PW4)I just want to askMy laptop is supported bluetooth?I am using windows 7 ultimate.
-
I have a new idea of Zoo Tycoon game! (Microsoft Game Studios)
I was playing Zoo Tycoon today and I thought of an idea to bring the Zoo Tycoon but better! I tried to go to zootycoon.com and bluefang.com, but they both stopped, I guess because they closed. In any case, my idea is to bring the Zoo Tycoon. Here is
-
Anyone know if microsoft has released a fix. For those who do not know the question. First of all, I have disabled wireless. During the game, as every 60 seconds vista looks for a better connection, however doing so creates a huge lag spike. That