2620xm router VPN module

Similar Questions

• EZVPN 2811 router VPN module

  Hi all

  I have a spare 2811 router that would like to use for the temporary easy VPN server.

  the router IOS is already updated security advance 15.0 K9.

  My question is the AIM - VPN a real map/module on the motherboard of the router or just pop up once the router has been upgraded to IOS security?

  SH ve | I have IOS
  Cisco IOS software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  #sh inv
  NAME: "2811 chassis', DESCR:"2811 chassis.
  PID: CISCO2811, VID: V02, SN: FTX0911Cxxx

  NAME: ' PVDMII DSP SIMM with a DSP on the Slot 0 SubSlot 4 ', DESCR: 'PVDMII DSP SIMM with a DSP.
  PID: PVDM2-16, VID: V01, SN: FOC13071xx

  NAME: "virtual private network (VPN) on the Slot Module 0 ', DESCR: 'encryption PURPOSE Element '.
  PID: AIM-VPN/EPII-PLUS, VID: v01, SN: FOC09072xx

  You have now two VPN modules in your router:

  1. The module for basic needs
  2. The module see you in "inventory to see the" which is placed in the OBJECTIVE of on-board connector. This module has a flow more and a greater number of tunnel and will be used by default.

  There are many examples of EzVPN configuration guide:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/sec_conn_esyvpn/configuration/15-Mt/sec-easy-VPN-15-Mt-book/sec-easy-VPN-Srvr.html

  If it is more then a temporary solution, I would also consider using an ASA to remote access VPN. EzVPN is more or less obsolete, and the ASA has many more features with the AnyConnect client. On the router, you can also configure remote access for AnyConnect, but it is much more complicated.

• VPN module?

  Hello, excuse my ignorance of beginners, but I came across a router 867VAE with a "VPN".

  Please can someone explain what this VPN "module.

  I now what are virtual private networks and that they are configured through the CLI but what does mean by "module VPN?

  Thanks for the clarification

  Am I right in assuming that you understand that VPN protects the traffic through the data encryption? And am I right in assuming that you understand that encryption would create significant overhead on the processor, if the calculation for encryption has been done in the CPU?

  If Yes, then it will be easy to explain that the VPN module you request is intended to reduce the CPU load by doing the calculation for encryption in a hardware module rather than according to the CPU for it.

  HTH

  Rick

• C1841 without the BUILD - IN Module, Bill VPN is a VPN MODULE?

  Hello

  Yesterday, that I just got a new router found on eBay.

  When I boot it I see 2 FastEthernet Interfaces (this is normal and I see them) BUT it also shows me 1 Module of virtual private network (VPN).

  Before I open this new router I try something like:

  Material SH

  SH crypto multicylindres

  HS cry engine Accelerator stat

  Here below you have the results:

  I opened the ROUTER and I see:

  NO ADDITIONAL MEMORY

  NO VPN MODULE

  Did you do something with a built-in CISCO VPN module

  Thanks in advance for your help

  Best regards

  Didier

  Router hardware #sh

  Cisco IOS Software, 1841 (C1841-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4 (24) T1, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)

  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Updated Saturday 19 June 09 14:00 by prod_rel_team

  ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4 (13r) T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  The availability of router is 9 hours, 47 minutes

  System to regain the power ROM

  System image file is "flash: c1841-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 24.T1.bin".

  This product contains cryptographic features and is under the United States

  States and local laws governing the import, export, transfer and

  use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply

  third party approval to import, export, distribute or use encryption.

  Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for

  compliance with U.S. laws and local countries. By using this product you

  agree to comply with the regulations and laws in force. If you are unable

  to satisfy the United States and local laws, return the product.

  A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products to:

  http://www.Cisco.com/WWL/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html

  If you need assistance please contact us by mail at

  [email protected] / * /.

  Cisco 1841 (revision 7.0) with 118784K / 12288K bytes of memory.

  Card processor ID FCZ1217905C

  2 FastEthernet interfaces

  1 module of virtual private network (VPN)

  Configuration of DRAM is 64 bits wide with disabled parity.

  191K bytes of NVRAM memory.

  250880K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (read/write)

  Configuration register is 0 x 3922

  Router #.

  Router #sh crypto multicylindres

  crypto engine name: virtual private network (VPN) Module

  crypto engine type: hardware

  Status: enabled

  Geographical area: 0 on board

  Name of product: edge-VPN

  HW Version: 1.0

  Compression: Yes

  A: Yes

  3 a: Yes

  AES - CBC: Yes (128,192,256)

  AES CNTR: No.

  Maximum length of the buffer: 4096

  Index maximum DH: 0000

  Maximum ITS index: 0000

  Maximum fluidity index: 0300

  The maximum size of the RSA key: 0000

  version of crypto lib: 20.0.0

  engine crypto in the slot: 0

  platform: hardware VPN Accelerator

  version of crypto lib: 20.0.0

  Router #sh cry engine Accelerator stat

  Device: FPGA

  Location: on board: 0

  : Statistics for device encryption since the last clear

  counters 35534 seconds ago

  68607 68607 out packages packages

  49819692 bytes in 50341181 bytes on

  1 paks/s to 1 output paks/s

  11 Kbps in 11 Kbits/sec out

  29298 decrypted packets 39309 encrypted packets

  4074464 bytes before decipher 45745228 encrypted bytes

  2537109 bytes decrypted 47804072 bytes after encrypt

  0 0 packets compressed decompressed packets

  0 bytes before Dang 0 bytes before comp

  0 bytes after Dang 0 bytes after model

  0 packets bypass decompression 0 by-pass compressor packages

  Derivation of 0 bytes 0 bytes decompression work around compressi

  0 packets not unzip 0 uncompressed packages

  0 bytes not decompressed 0 bytes not compressed

  1.0:1 overall compression ratio 1.0:1

  last 5 minutes:

  11 packages into 11 out packets

  0 paks/sec output paks/s 0

  32-bit/s at 28 bits/sec out

  496 bytes decrypted 329 bytes encrypted

  13 decrypted Kbps 8 Kbps encrypted

  1.0:1 overall compression ratio 1.0:1

  FPGA:

  DS: 0x6538DE50 idb:0x6538CD08

  Statistics for virtual private network (VPN) Module:

  68607 68607 out packages packages

  1 paks/s to 1 output paks/s

  11 Kbps in 11 Kbits/sec out

  29298 decrypted packets 39309 encrypted packets

  package overruns: 0 packets output dropped: 0

  tx_hi_drops: 0 fw_failure: 0

  invalid_sa: 0 invalid_flow: 0

  null_ip_error: 0 pad_size_error: 0 out_bound_dh_acc: 0

  esp_auth_fail: 0 ah_auth_failure: 0 crypto_pad_error: 0

  ah_prot_absent: 0 ah_seq_failure: 0 ah_spi_failure: 0

  esp_prot_absent:0 esp_seq_fail: 0 esp_spi_failure: 0

  obound_sa_acc: 0 invalid_sa: 0 out_bound_sa_flow: 0

  invalid_dh: 0 bad_keygroup: 0 out_of_memory: 0

  no_sh_secret: 0 no_skeys: 0 invalid_cmd: 0

  pak_too_big: 0

  tx_lo_queue_size_max 0 cmd_unimplemented: 0

  flow_cfg_mismatch 0 flow_ip_add_mismatch: 0

  unknown_protocol 0 bad_particle_align: 0

  35535 seconds since the last cleaning counters

  Interruptions: Notification = 54892

  Router #.

  vpn module on board can certainly improve VPN performance comparing to pure VPN software, but is not as good as the AIM - VPN module.

  So, this will depend on your vpn traffic load, etc...

• Route VPN site to site on one path other than the default gateway

  I want to route VPN site-to-site on one path other than the default gateway

  ASA 5510

  OS 8.0 8.3 soon

  1 (surf) adsl line interface default gateway

  line 1 interface SDSL (10 VPN site-to-site)

  1 LAN interface

  What's possible?

  Thank you

  Sorry for my English

  Here is the assumption that I will do:

  -Your IP SHDL is 200.1.1.1, and the next hop is 200.1.1.2

  -Your LAN-to-LAN ends on this interface (interface card crypto SHDL)

  -VPN peer 1 - 150.1.1.1 and LAN is 192.168.1.0/24

  -VPN peer 2 - 175.1.1.1 and LAN is 192.168.5.0/24

  This is the routing based on the assumption above:

  Route SHDL 150.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 175.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 200.1.1.2

  Route SHDL 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 200.1.1.2

  Hope that helps.

• Static and NAT router to router VPN

  Hello

  I have two site VPN using routers. The VPN is fine, BUT - at the end of the seat, the customer has NAT entries static to allow incoming connections - any service that has a NAT static to allow incoming connections from the Internet is inaccessible in the same way. Ping, for example, doesn't have this problem because there is no static NAT entry. I tried to configure a route map-"No. - nat" according to the http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949ef.shtml , I thought I was working.

  H.O. has the IP 131.203.64.0/24 and 135.0.0.0/24 (I know, I know - I'm trying to change), and the R.O. 192.168.1.0/24.

  Bits of configuration:

  IP nat inside source overload map route SHEEP interface Ethernet0

  IP nat inside source static tcp 135.0.0.248 131.203.100.27 3389 3389 extensible

  (other static removed)

  Int-E0-In extended IP access list

  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  (other entries deleted)

  access-list 198 deny ip 131.203.64.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 198 deny ip 135.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 198 allow ip 135.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  SHEEP allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 198

  1 remove the static entry for the specified host the VPN problem, but obviously breaks things :(

  2. as mentioned, the VPN itself works fine, I can ping hosts perfectly.

  Any help greatly appreciated :)

  Thank you

  Mike.

  You must use the option of the route to the static NAT map. This is a new feature in 12.2 (4) T according to this page:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/ipras_r/ip1_i2g.htm#1079180

  He must do exactly what you want. The old, another way to do is use "The thing", where you create a loopback interface and don't make a nat interface and use routing strategy for routing VPN traffic to one address on the same subnet as the loopback interface, but not the address of the loop. IOS then that réacheminera traffic to the real destination (in this case the remote VPN site), but since now it is not a 'ip nat inside' interface, the static nat translations does not apply and the VPN traffic will not be translated. The problem with this solution is that all loopback traffic is switched to the process, so it is a bit of a hack, but these things are sometimes necessary.

  HTH

• Router VPN 3005 and 7500

  Hi all

  Could you someboy help me on that?

  I have a network like this:

  Internet Internet

  | |

  router VPN - 3005

  |

  Internal

  I can set up Lan to Lan VPN 3005 and other PIX aside, but I can't ping internal network with the back of my internal network. I've already put the static route to the subnet of setbacks in the router and my subnet route internal VPN. What should I do? Thanks in advance.

  Banlan

  in fact the 3000 can do a ping will depend on your network-lists / lists access so that my not be a relevant question.

• IOS router + VPN + ACS downloadable IP ACL

  I want to use the function "Downloadable IP ACL" 3825-router VPN (OI 12.4 T) in combination with a CBS.

  In many documents and discussions, I read that it is possible to use the DACLs on "devices Cisco IOS version 12.3 (8) T or higher.

  Authentication and authorization by the AEC works and the device gets some settings of the av-pair-feature.

  I have tried several things to apply the DACL as the use of av pairs or ACS "Downloadable IP ACL" function, but nothing works.

  In the debug log, I see that the av pair is transmitted to the device, but it is not used.

  --> Can you tell me, is it possible to use the DACLs on the IOS routers?

  --> How does it work? What can I change?

  --> Is there a good manual to apply it?

  Thanks for your help!

  Martin

  It would be useful to know the PURPOSE of what you're trying to do...

  AFAIR client config mode requires no ACL for filtering short tunnel split ACL... and I have no way to test right now.

  If you want to allow or not some clients access to certain subnets why not investigate tunneling ACL and vpn-filter in combination with ACS split will rather than for the DACL.

• Unusual routing VPN configuration

  Hi, I use a PIX 525 to our main site, and one of the remote sites using a router in 1721. The 1721 connects to the LAN. All traffic is forced to use a virtual private network between the remote sites and main. The intention was to force the internet traffic from the remote site through the filter of content on the main site, rather than use the split tunneling to leave straight out to the internet through their DSL connection.

  The problem is that, of course, internet traffic this VPN comes back the PIX, Internet. Our content filter reflects the way of the switch connected to the internal interface of a PIX.

  I need to find a way to route VPN traffic from the remote site to an ethernet on the PIX interface which will be connected to our switch stack. If I can do this without breaking the VPN, traffic should be filtered on the main façade and through VPN to the remote side.

  Yes, you're pretty much toast unless:

  you choose to configure a web proxy to Headquarters and set up remote PCs to use it. In this way, they use a proxy that is located behind the 8e6.

  Same pix os 7 will not help, as all nat occurs on this topic - just remote communication will flow through the pix, never hit its physical interface or internal switch ports inside and so the 8e6.

• Connect to the router VPN using PPTP (Ubuntu)

  Hello

  As I mentioned in other post, I try to get the VPN works for my Ubuntu workstation. I'm not an expert of VPN, so I need help.

  So far, people seem to agree that pptp is easier to config that IPSec (under Linux platform). Select the PPTP Protocol and add a user account for the Linksys router.

  Now, the Linux part.

  I have pptp-linux installation (it is the best client for linux pptp seams). I try to set it up, but I missed something relatd to coding or something.

  I try to follow this documentation: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VPNClient#PPTP

  When I run this command: pon myvpn nodetach

  I get the following error:

  Using interface ppp0
  Connect: ppp0 <-->/dev/pts/2
  MPPE required, but not executed [v2] MS-CHAP authentication.
  Connection down.

  Here is the log of the router:

  15 Oct 21:51:02 2008 Client Remote System Log [] disconnect PPTP server.

  Kind regards

  Hello

  Thanks for your help and this useful link.

  I have change my configuration file and I managed to set up the pptp connection.

  Here the configuration file that I use (for people with the same problem):

  RemoteName until-vpn
  LinkName until-vpn
  ipparam entmd-vpn
  Pty "pptp exemple.dyndns.org - nolaunchpppd.
  name budderball
  usepeerdns
  require mppe
  garbage-eap
  /noauth
  file /etc/ppp/options.pptp

  Also, I change the contents of/etc/ppp/chap-secrets:

  Budderball until vpn-based *.

  With this configuration, I can launch the tunnel and communicate with the gateway and LAN.

  Here the command line I use to establish the connection and than create road so that any request for 192.168.1.0/24 use the ppp0 interface.

  sudo pon entmd-cpn debug dump logfd 2 nodetach

  sudo route add - net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev ppp0

  Finally, by reading the documentation, I found a plugin for Network Manager. It's a work like a charm.

  For ubuntu: sudo apt - get install network-manager-pptp

  An installation, you must restart to 'activate' the plugin. (this is a bug)

  You can use the network - manager to configure your pptp connection. I intend to post a wikiw on the Ubuntu Wiki page.

• 5 routing VPN site

  Hi all

  I threw myself little in this project without a lot of lead in.  Basically, we have 5 sites

  Site A: HQ with ASA 5520

  Site B: Remote with 5505 with L2L at Site A

  Site C: Remote with 5505 with L2L at Site A

  Square D: distance with 5505 with L2L at the Site

  Site E: Remote with 5505 with L2L at Site A

  In an emergency, I had to get phone running systems when a T1 PTP line was cut at the beginning by the customer! I created a VLAN on each phone named 5505 and created the Tunnels of VPN L2L all return to the HQs 5520.  Everything was good in the neighborhood, phones were talking about main PBX server to HQ, we could compose and in no problem.  The problem is now the phone Vender tells us that we need routing between each site. We cannot compose between each remote site without using external number (whereas before you dial internal extensions in order to reach all other sites)

  Site B needs to talk to the PBX to C, D and E (A, obviously as well but that is already at work) and so on.

  I found topics dealing with 2 remote sites requiring a routing, however, with 4 that all need to routing to the other configs will very quickly very vast and complicated.  There is already extra virtual private networks to of the HQ 5520 who go elsewhere and a good amount of security configurations, so the config is already pretty decently sized.

  Is there a better way to do this, or should I start to write my setups now?

  If I understand your question, you need to configure a list of VPN networks on each VPN Ray and the hub.

  For example on the RADIUS B a crypto access list that is similar to:

  ip-> A B permit

  ip-> C B permit

  ip-> D B permit

  ip-E > B permit

  corresponding Cryptography ACL on the hub for talks would be like:

  IP-> B to allow

  IP C-> B permit

  allow the ip D-> B

  E-> B ip license

  Repeat for each Department accordingly.

  So basically your configuration crypto would ' t grow, only the ACL crypto.

  You can work with groups of objects to simplify the ACL crypt, in this case:

  Crypto ACL on Hub B:

  object-group VoIP-dst

  object A

  object C

  object D

  object E

  object-group VoIP-src

  object B

  permit ip src VoIP VoIP-dst

  And so on...

  Just make sure your config allows same-security-traffic intra-interface

• Cisco VPN router VPN client commercial provider

  Hello

  IM new Cisco VPN technology so please forgive my ignorance.

  I am trying to connect my router to a comercial that support IPSec VPN provider gave me only that here the server ip, user name and password Secret.

  With this information, that I can, for example, to connect with an iPhone using the monofamille in Cisco's VPN IPSec.

  My question is how I put this up directly on a cisco router, or using CCP or config?

  Thanks in advance for all the help/pointers

  with the info given, there are the following config:

  Crypto ipsec VPN ezvpn client
  connect auto
  Astrill key way2stars group
  client mode
  Peer 1.2.3.4
  Astrill-email Astrill-password username password

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• RA on IOS router VPN

  Hello Experts,

  Can someone send me the link on how to set up remote access VPN on Cisco IOS routers (authentication of remote users based on user names configured locally on the router itself)?    I found a few links, but they are all authencating by certificate, LDAP users.     I need authentication direct simple remote control-users by using the name of normal user/pass created on the router IOS locally.

  I don't have CA or LDAP server to authenticate remote users.  I just need simple authentication as what Cisco ASA.

  Hi Wade,.

  In addition to this shared Neno, you can check this link to third party which is pretty clear:

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/remote-access-VPN-connection-using-a-Cisco-router

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• Router VPN, where to place?

  I have a Cisco ASA NAT fact.

  I have a 2801 with OBJECTIVE VPN.

  Should I place external int of the router outside the firewall and internal int of the router in the DMZ of firewall IOS execution of ASA-then on the outside... or place the external int of the router in the DMZ - ASA and internal int of the router network internally, then do a NAT one to one in external int of the router with ASA? If I do the 2nd option, I have headaches with NAT and IPSec tunnels? More precisely if I want to protect the public NAT had the IP address of the servers in a DMZ instead of private so I don't overlap LANs...?

  Thank you!

  I knew of your sugestion ecrypted ipsec rehbeh will go to the DMZ-1 for the router, and then after it cracked me he switch to the router on the inside interface, then to the ASA dmz-2 finally to the asa inside the interface to the private network.

  It is good for security but a cuple of disadvantages as u mentioned it will be higher performance on the firewall and it will consume more public ip address and interfaces

  as I sujested before

  and also it is sujested by sevral cisco cruises and the design of the security templates

  It's better to divide your network to the security layer

  so when you put the router in front of the fire wall, it will be considered as router permiter and at this point, you can allow only know good circulation (called model of security policy) and also to terminate the vpn on it so the vpn will be decrypted for the firewall (the idea even URS) while the vpn connection traffic will be exposed to the firewall for inspection for example inspection request extra packages for the filltering filltering been on the permiter router, mybe will be sent to the AIP - ssm IPS firewall model for inspection signtures (called model signture who deny traffic unfamiliar)

  will, is also part of the security in the deployment depth

  Thank you and so useful rates

• Between asa 5510 and router VPN

  Hello

  I configured ASA 5510 to vpn LAN to LAN with router 17 857. and between the routers.

  between vpn routers works very well.

  from the local network behind the ASA I can ping the computers behind routers.

  but computers behind routers, I cannot ping PSC behind ASA.

  I have configured the remote access with vpn cisco 4.X client, it works well with routers, but cannot work with asa.

  the asa is connected to the wan via zoom router (adsl)

  Are you telnet in the firewall?

  Follow these steps to display the debug output:

  monitor terminal

  farm forestry monitor 7 (type this config mode)

  Otherwise if its console, do "logging console 7'.

  can do

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Debug crypto ipsec

  and then generate a ping from one device to the back of the ASA having 192.168.200.0 address towards one of the VPN subnets... and then paste the result here

  Concerning

  Farrukh