Cisco VPN router VPN client commercial provider

Similar Questions

• IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

  Hello

  I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

  The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

  There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

  Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

  Can someone help me please?

  Thank you

  Peter

  RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

  Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

  !

  the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

  x key

  pool vpnclientpool

  ACL 190

  include-local-lan

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  !

  card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

  client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

  ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set peer x

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 180

  card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description $ES_WAN$

  card crypto ETH0

  !

  IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

  !

  !

  overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

  !

  IP access-list extended LOCAL

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

  Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

  DE:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

  DE:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

  Hope that helps.

• Problems to connect via the Cisco VPN client IPSec of for RV180W small business router

  Hello

  I tried to configure my router Cisco of RV180W as a customer VPN IPSec, but have encountered a problem that I hope someone can help me with. "" I managed to do the work of configuration so that the Cisco's VPN IPSec client authenticates successfully with the XAUTH user, I put on the router, but during the negotiation, the client ends with the following, which appears several times on the router error message: ' Mar 20 Oct 19:41:53 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [34360] has no config mode.

  I've read around the internet and a number of people seem to say that the Cisco VPN Client is not compatible with the router, but the same thing happens to my iPhone VPN client.

  Is it possible that this can be implemented? Below, I have attached the full configuration files and the log files. Thank you much in advance.

  Router log file (I changed the IP addresses > respectively as well as references to MAC addresses)

  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - T with counterpart > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: notification to ignore INITIAL-CONTACT > [44074] because it is admitted only after the phase 1.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [4500]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: is located behind a device. NAT and alsoPeer is behind a NAT device
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: login successful for the user "myusername".
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser connected from the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [10381]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28684
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: remove the invalid payload with doi:0.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: purged-Association of ISAKMP security with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser Logged Out of the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:16 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>

  The router configuration

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm.png

  

  IKE policy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm_001.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.01_pm.png

  

  VPN strategy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm_001.png

  

  Client configuration

  Hôte : < router="" ip=""> >

  Authentication group name: remote.com

  Password authentication of the Group: mysecretpassword

  Transport: Enable Transparent Tunneling; IPSec over UDP (NAT/PAT)

  Username: myusername

  Password: mypassword

  Please contact Cisco.

  Correct, the RV180 is not compatible with the Cisco VPN Client.  The Iphone uses the Cisco VPN Client.

  You can use the PPTP on the RV180 server to connect a PPTP Client.

  In addition, it RV180 will allow an IPsec connection to third-party customers 3.  Greenbow and Shrew Soft are 2 commonly used clients.

• PIX: Cisco VPN Client connects but no routing

  Hello

  We have a Cisco PIX 515 with software 7.1 (2). He accepts Cisco VPN Client connections with no problems, but no routing does to internal networks directly connected to the PIX. For example, my PC is affected by the IP 172.16.2.57 and then ping does not respond to internal Windows server 172.16.0.12 or trying to RDP. The most irritating thing is that these attempts are recorded in the system log, but always ended with "SYN timeout", as follows:

  2009-01-06 23:23:01 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302013-6-PIX: built 3315917 for incoming TCP connections (172.16.2.57/1283) outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 (ALAI2/3389)

  2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Info 217.15.42.214% 302014-6-PIX: TCP connection disassembly 3315917 for outside:172.16.2.57/1283 inside: ALAI2 / 3389 duration 0:00:30 bytes 0 SYN Timeout

  2009-01-06 23:23:31 Local4.Debug 217.15.42.214% 7-PIX-609002: duration of disassembly-outside local host: 172.16.2.57 0:00:30

  We tried to activate and deactivate "nat-control", "permit same-security-traffic inter-interface" and "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface", but the results are the same: the VPN connection is successfully established, but remote clients cannot reach the internal servers.

  I enclose the training concerned in order to understand the problem:

  interface Ethernet0

  Speed 100

  full duplex

  nameif outside

  security-level 0

  IP address xx.yy.zz.tt 255.255.255.240

  !

  interface Ethernet1

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  172.16.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248

  !

  access extensive list ip 172.16.0.0 outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.2.56 255.255.255.248

  !

  VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0

  !

  IP local pool pool_vpn_clientes 172.16.2.57 - 172.16.2.62 mask 255.255.255.248

  !

  NAT-control

  Global xx.yy.zz.tt 12 (outside)

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 12 172.16.0.12 255.255.255.255

  !

  internal VPN_clientes group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy VPN_clientes

  xxyyzz.NET value by default-field

  internal VPN_client_group group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy VPN_client_group

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list VPN_client_group_splitTunnelAcl

  xxyyzz.local value by default-field

  !

  I join all the details of the cryptographic algorithms because the VPN is successfully completed, as I said at the beginning. In addition, routing tables are irrelevant in my opinion, because the inaccessible hosts are directly connected to the internal LAN of the PIX 515.

  Thank you very much.

  can you confirm asa have NAT traversal allow otherwise, activate it in asa and vpn clients try again.

  PIX / ASA 7.1 and earlier versions

  PIX (config) #isakmp nat-traversal 20

  PIX / ASA 7.2 (1) and later versions

  PIX (config) #crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20

• Cisco VPN Client 2801 router

  Hello

  I installed a router cisco 2801 to accept vpn connections, I use the cisco vpn client and the tunnel is created and is being created of the its.

  However, I cannot ping my vlan (only those who have a nat inside the ACL, those who have not said I can ping), so I have a NAT problem, just don't know where.

  Heres part of my setup on the ACL,

  IP local pool ippool 192.168.100.10 192.168.100.100

  by default-gateway IP X.X.X.X (ISP GATEWAY)

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP http server

  no ip http secure server

  IP http flash path:

  !

  !

  IP nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 2 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 3 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 6 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  overload of IP nat inside source list 20 interface FastEthernet0/1

  IP nat inside source map route SHEEP interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X (external IP)

  Route IP 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.40.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  IP route 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2

  !

  NAT extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.60.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.90.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any

  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any

  IP 192.168.30.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  IP 192.168.60.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  IP 192.168.90.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 1 permit 192.168.90.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 2 allow to 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 3 allow 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 6 permit 192.168.60.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 20 allow 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  SHEEP allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP NAT

  !

  The 192.168.90.2 address is my switch L3 (Cisco 3750)

  Any pointer is more than welcome,

  Concerning

  Miranda,

  Have you tried to remove the following lines:

  IP nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 2 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 3 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  IP nat inside source list 6 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  overload of IP nat inside source list 20 interface FastEthernet0/1

  And simply let this one:

  IP nat inside source map route SHEEP interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  ?

  I have all the neceary allowed in the ACL of NAT, so you do not have individual lines for each network.

  Also, I noticed that your ACL 20 reads

  access-list 20 allow 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  But your NAT ACL bed

  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any

  I think you have a typo in there, you have a 200 on 20 and on the other.

  Check it out and let me know how it goes. Don't forget to clear the NAT table after deleting these lines:

  clear the ip nat trans *.

  I hope this helps!

  Raga

• Using Cisco VPN Client VPN

  Is it possible to use a private network virtual created with the WRVS4400N router with VPN Client from Cisco Systems (ver 5) software? (Although QuickVPN works very well.)

  Is it possible to use with Account customer VPN mode? Or is it possible to use with IPSec VPN (Tunnel) mode? If so, please provide together how to client-side and the router. Thank you!

  Unfortunately Small Business routers are not compatible with the Cisco VPN Clients. The Cisco VPN Clients have more parameters that are not available in the materials of the series of small businesses, so all we can use is the application of QVPN.

• How to create a VPN file .pcf for the CISCO VPN CLIENT software profile

  Dear all

  How to create a VPN file .pcf for the CISCO VPN CLIENT software profile

  Concerning

  Hi Imran,

  Can't do much about that because it depends on what authenticate you the VPN server and how the settings. But let me introduce you to the memory layout. Once you install and open a VPN client. Press it again and it opens up a new page for the VPN config.

  Example of configuration as it is attached. But it differs depending on the configuration of your vpn server.

  Once you create and save this profile. Your FCP file is stored.

  Please assess whether the information provided is useful.

  By

  Knockaert

• Cisco vpn client is supported on the analogue ppp connection

  can someone pls tell me if we can use the client vpn cisco on a ppp connection analog and put a pix that is not PPPs running. If it works, then why do we need to VPN L2tp/ipsec. can someone pls tell me something abt it. It is very urgent.

  concerning

  Assane

  Assane,

  If I understand your question, you speak with PPP initially to get an IP address from your service provider, then use the Client VPN VPN in your Pix Firewall. If so, yes it is possible.

  To name a few reasons why PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC is used instead of Cisco VPN Client are:

  1. because companies have used a PPTP or L2TP/IPSEC solution for some time and are migrating to Cisco VPN

  2. do not install vpn on the PC client software

  3. won't pay for the VPN Client software licenses

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

• Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP VPN Client IPSec to ASA

  I configured ASA for IPSec VPN via Cisco VPN Client and XP VPN client communications. I can connect successfully with Cisco VPN Client, but I get an error when connecting with the XP client. Debugging said "misconfigured groups and transport/tunneling mode" I know, they use different methods of transport and tunneling, and I think that I have configured both. Take a look at the config.

  PS a funny thing - when I connect with client VPN in Windows Server 2003, I have no error. The only difference is that client XP is behind an ADSL router and client server is directly connected to the Internet on one of its public IP of interfaces. NAT in the case of XP can cause problems?

  Config is:

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2.30

  Description remote access

  VLAN 30

  nameif remote access

  security-level 0

  IP 85.*. *. 1 255.255.255.0

  !

  access-list 110 scope ip allow a whole

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.10 eq ssh

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.26 eq ssh

  access-list extended ip allowed any one sheep

  access list nat-ganja extended permit tcp any host 10.254.17.18 eq ssh

  sheep-vpn access-list extended permits all ip 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  flow-export destination inside-Bct 192.168.1.27 9996

  IP local pool raccess 192.168.121.60 - 192.168.121.120 mask 255.255.255.0

  ARP timeout 14400

  global (outside-Baku) 1 interface

  global (outside-Ganja) interface 2

  NAT (inside-Bct) 0 access-list sheep-vpn

  NAT (inside-Bct) 1 access list nat

  NAT (inside-Bct) 2-nat-ganja access list

  Access-group rdp on interface outside-Ganja

  !

  Access remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.*. *. 1 2

  Route outside Baku 10.254.17.24 255.255.255.248 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside Baku 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Outside-Baku route 192.168.39.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.184.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside Baku 192.168.208.16 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.208.112 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.18 1

  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  Crypto ipsec transform-set newset aes - esp esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac vpnclienttrans

  Crypto ipsec transform-set vpnclienttrans transport mode

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac raccess

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 214748364

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life security-association 214748364

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  vpnclientmap 30 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

  card crypto interface for remote access vpnclientmap

  crypto isakmp identity address

  ISAKMP crypto enable vpntest

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Baku

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Ganja

  crypto ISAKMP enable remote access

  ISAKMP crypto enable Interior-Bct

  crypto ISAKMP policy 30

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  No encryption isakmp nat-traversal

  No vpn-addr-assign aaa

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 Interior-Bct

  internal vpn group policy

  attributes of vpn group policy

  value of DNS-server 192.168.1.3

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel

  BCT.AZ value by default-field

  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  raccess address pool

  Group-RADIUS authentication server

  Group Policy - by default-vpn

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  pre-shared-key *.

  Hello

  For the Cisco VPN client, you would need a tunnel-group name configured on the ASA with a pre-shared key.

  Please see configuration below:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  or

  http://tinyurl.com/5t67hd

  Please see the section of tunnel-group config of the SAA.

  There is a tunnel-group called "rtptacvpn" and a pre-shared key associated with it. This group name is used by the VPN Client Group name.

  So, you would need a specific tunnel-group name configured with a pre-shared key and use it on the Cisco VPN Client.

  Secondly, because you are behind a router ADSL, I'm sure that's configured for NAT. can you please activate NAT - T on your ASA.

  "crypto isakmp nat-traversal.

  Thirdly, change the transformation of the value

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  Let me know the result.

  Thank you

  Gilbert

• Configuration of Cisco for Cisco VPN Client ASA 5505

  Our firm has finally made the move from Sonicwall Cisco for our SMB customers. Got our first customer with a VPN site-to site solid and you have configured the main router for connections via the Cisco VPN Client VPN Wizard.

  When I install the VPN Client on desktop computers that does not capture all the necessary options (unless you have a SSL VPN). I guess that there is a process that I am missing to export a connection profile that Cisco VPN Client users can import for their connection.

  There step by step guides to create the connection profile file to distribute to customers?

  Hello

  The ASDM wizard is for the configuration on the SAA. This wizard will help you complete the VPN configuration on the end of the ASA.

  You will need to set the same in the client, so that they can negotiate and connect.

  Input connection in the client field, that's what you want to be seen that on the VPN client - it can be any name

  Host will be the external ip address of the ASA.

  Group options:

  name - same tunnel as defined on the ASA group
  Password - pre-shared as on ASA.

  Confirm password - same pre-shared key.

  Once this is over, you will see the customer having an entry same as a login entry. You must click on connect there. He will be a guest user and the password. Please enter the login crendentials. VPN connects.

  You can distribute the .pcf file that is formed at the place mentioned in the post above. Once the other client receive the .pcf, they need to import it by clicking this tab on the VPN client.

  Kind regards

  Anisha

• RV120 VPN with full Cisco VPN Client?

  Is it possible to configure the RV120 for a VPN IPsec for use with the complete Cisco VPN client?

  I tried, but it does not appear to support "Goup of authentication.

  I see in the confi router I can put a PSK, but the complete VPN client seems only accecpt "Goup authentication."

  I managed on the basis for the work "Fast VPN", how it works is beyond me, because he does not appear to create an adapter with an IP address or anything on the local line, and I didn't even create a VPN policy...

  Or put another way, what alternative (Free) VPN clients are there to work with the RV120?

  Try the following link for instructions for Cisco VPN and the SA500:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/multi_function_security/multi_function_security_appliance/sa_500/TechNote/note/SA500_vpnclient_appnote.PDF

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Rick Roe

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

• Cisco VPN client with internet

  Hello

  I have a big problem, we have implemented Cisco VPN client to connect to outside to our internal servers. My problem is that all users access to the internet while using the Cisco VPN client. We use the split tunneling, but still all VPN clients access the internet. An advisor to prevent access to the internet through VPN client.

  Thank you

  You said earlier that you allow split tunnel. Are you still doing that?

  We would need to see all of the VPN configuration - including access lists or objects referenced - to provide comprehensive advice.

• Cisco VPN Client

  Hello

  I would like to know why when it failed to connect to the private network through the Cisco VPN client and trying to establish an Internet connection, the connection Internet.

  Thanks in advance,

  SK

  Which would be configured on the vpn, firewall/router endpoint etc..

• Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

  Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

  The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

  Any ideas why this would happen?

  Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

  Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

  Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

• How to allow access to a local area network behind the cisco vpn client

  Hi, my question is about how to allow access to a local area network behind the cisco vpn client

  With the help of:

  • Cisco 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) that is running version 8.2 software
  • Cisco VPN Client version 5.0 software

  Cisco VPN client allows to inject a local routes in the routing table Cisco ASA?

  Thank you.

  Hi Vladimir,.

  Unfortunately this is not a supported feature if you connect through the VPN Client. With VPN Client, that the VPN Client can access the VPN Client LAN host/local machine, not host from the local network to business as customer VPN is not designed for access from the local company network, but to the local corporate network.

  If you want to access from your local business to your LAN network, you need to configure LAN-to-LAN tunnel.