5.2 ACS access policy

Similar Questions

• Parental Controls + Internet Access Policy 'Add' is shaded on

  I need to add several new devices to my "target devices" in the Parental control-Internet access policy and program schedules that devices can get online. But my 'Add' is shaded out and I'm not allowed to add devices. I use the browser to log in to the router.

  To manage access to the Internet, you have two methods available, Parental control and Internet access policy. That a method can be used at a time. So my first question which option you are trying to use to block or plan the Internet access?

  As the Parental controls can restrict internet access for up to five computers or devices. You can block access to the internet or to limit it to specific times, and you can also block specific Web sites.

  So if you have several devices then 5 to add then you should use the political Internet access option.

• Cannot change the access policy (firepower 6.1)

  Hello

  I use the Service Module of firepower on ASA5525 and MC, firepower, the two version 6.1.

  After the upgrade to version 6.1, I can't save any changes on my access policy. I always get a message "error saving data - another operation by another user has prevented this operation. Please try again after some time.
  I am the only on access to the MC, there is no task that is running and I tried to reload the MC, but I got the same error.

  Please, did anyone see that? This could be the cause?

  Thank you.

  I solved the problem by replacing all the objects 'Private network' by 'IPv4-private-All-RFC1918.

• apply access policy file policy

  Hello world

  I created a policy file on the center of the defense and must apply to the access policy so that it can reach the sensor.

  How can I do

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  To associate a policy file with an access control rule:

  Step 1 Select policies > access control.
  Step 2 Click Change next to the access control policy to change.
  Step 3 Click Add an article.
  Step 4 Ensure that Action is set to allow, block Interactive or Interactive block with reset.
  Step 5 The tab control.
  Step 6 Select a policy file.
  Step 7 Click Add to save your changes.

• What is the dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access?

  Can Hi anyone explain the following? I examine documents Cisco Anyconnect SSL VPN. It does not have these commands. What is the relationship of the Anyconnect VPN with these commands? Or send a link. Thank you

  -----

  dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access

  Description 'access ABC '.

  WebVPN

  the value of the URL - list A_Intranet, ABC_Access

  SVC request to enable default svc

  --------------------

  I checked the document from Cisco, which say:

  Operating instructions

  Use the dynamic-access-policy-record command in configuration mode global to create one or more DAP records. When you use this command, you dynamic-access-policy-record mode, in which you can set attributes for the record named the DAP. The commands that you can use dynamic-access-policy-recording mode are:

  • Action (continue, terminate or quarantine)
  • Description
  • network-acl
  • priority
  • message from the user
  • WebVPN

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/ASA-command-reference/...

  That is - this to create one or more DAP records for?

  Please see the following guide for a good overview and details on the use and deployment of DAP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

• How to recover Access Policy based on OUD groups

  I have a table named userdata with 3 columns

  1 user name

  2 take

  3 OUDgroup(associated with user)

  I need to find the access policy attached with this OUD group and then retrieve the role associated with this access policy. Please help me

  Concerning

  SuperCoolDamnAwsome

  Hello

  By joining the POL, POG and UGP tables, we can get the name of role associated with the access policy.

  Here is the query to get the name of role associated with the access policy.

  Select p.pol_name, u.ugp_name, u.ugp_rolename in pol p, u of the PMU, pog where p.pol_key = pog.pol_key and you.ugp_key = pog.ugp_key;

  Hope this helps

  Thank you

• Access policy - value of the attribute of provisioning failure

  Hello

  is it possible to configure a value for the attribute of non-entitlement to access policy applies to all users? I changed a strategy of access and successfully implemented a change in the rights of the system target, but did not at the disposal of another value of the attribute (by changing the form of target system in the definition of the access policy).

  Peter

  In this case, you will need to write your own custom code and need to trigger as an adapter of task of process or event handlers.

  ~ J

• Harvest access policy does not

  Hello

  I'm accommodating a target system LDAP connected to IOM 11 GR 2 PS2 and I would like to use the political feature of harvest. I reconciled an account and it's target (rights) system roles in IOM and I waited this work to "Evaluate the user policies" would be given a role of IOM corresponding to the user (based on the system of law and the target defined in the access policy). But it doesn't work--not even after setting manual USER_PROVISIONING_ATTRS explicit. POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED = 1 (in the comic book) - after the work performed to the value of POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED is 0, but there is no association between the user account and the corresponding IOM role (I expect that this is the result of the harvest of the access policy).

  My setup - I set the cfg attributes XL system. AllowAPHarvesting, XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning to access TRUE, corresponding policy must be harvested system target filled in and also the corresponding payment is defined in the policy. Retro indicator is on. I did not set the discriminator to account for the target system because there is max one account per user in the target system LDAP.

  Can you help me identify the reason why the harvest is not working?

  Peter

  Hello

  Evaluate user policies does not associate a role of IOM with the user.

  The following post associate old user role:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E40329_01/admin.1112/e27149/Scheduler.htm#OMADM738

  Refresh the role memberships

  It assesses the role memberships and assigns users to roles based on rules. This work evaluates all the roles which the composition rules have changed since the last work performed and their immediate assessment have not been chosen by the administrator.

  None

  Yes

  ~ J

• Access policy owner OIM 11 G PS3

  Hello

  During the creation of the OIM 11 g PS3 access strategy, you can specify the owner of the policy. What is the use of this field and how does it serve practically?

  Thank you

  Access policy owner

  In this version, access policy owner has no any special privileges. The policy configuration UI access are available in the Administration of identity system, only system administrators can access this feature. There is also no authorization from added control of access policy of API access management policy owners.

  Reference: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E52734_01/oim/OMADM/accesspolicies.htm#OMADM3124

• Resource not available for selection in the access policy

  
  Hello

  I'm working on OIM11g R2 PS2 explore all of the new features available.

  I created a resource COMPUTING (SunONE_Resource) for the provision to users of SunONE (using the connector of the OID ) and got users provisioned it successfully asking for it by the Instance of the Application. Now I want to do it Auto-mis in service. So, I created a single policy role and access. But in step 2 of the access policy where we Julie IT resource, my resource (SunONE_Resource) IT is not visible and is the resource available only: LDAP User. I have selected LDAP user as a resource and create access policy.

  But when I'm allocating the specific role of the user, the user does not have configured my SunONE resource.

  I have run the Task Scheduler to assess access policies manually as well.

  Please help me in this regard.

  Kind regards

  Maryse

  Thanks for your quick response.

  I have fixed the problem. The problem was there 2 political access do the same thing. Thus, the system searches for a system property: XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning and it has been set to false.

  So, I changed the settings to another AP who was who collide with mine. Then it worked.

• API for access policy

  Hi all

  IOM have APIs for access policy?

  I use 11 GR 2 IOM SP13.

  Thanks in advance.

  dongsu

  Hello

  9.x API - tcAccessPolicyOperationsIntf (Oracle Fusion Middleware Java QAnywhere for Oracle Identity Manager)

• Access policy - remove a child table element

  Hello world

  I know that I can add the security group (child table of resource user AD) an AD with a Pollicy to access user account.

  Can I delete a group of security with an access policy?

  Thank you.

  Best regards.

  Yes you can.

  Case 1: Using existing access policy

  Change the access policy and to remove political access groups and access policy reassess existing aid assess political task of the user.

  This reapply the access policy and remove the eligibility list from the user groups and has AD.

  Case 2: Creating new access policy

  In this can create new policy without children table entries/groups.

  Then you must change the value of rule out based on your new political will to triggered.

  Role a rule say role is 'Full Time'

  unless and until what your role does not change new access policy will not comes into picture.

  suggestion if you perform commissioning using the access policy and then also use political access of shortages of resources and rights it will work well.

• How to pre-populate the organization name, and other fields in the form of access policy?

  Hi all

  I created a strategy of access to users to autoprovision for MS AD, but I need to solve a problem. I do not know how to pre-populate e.g. name of the Organization (or other fields) of resource AD user in the access policy and prepopulate the plugins created for user AD form do not work here.

  Please, could you help me to solve this "problem"?

  Thank you

  Milan

  Access policies get a static value.  You can't fill a field with an adapter.  If you do, leave the field blank and put an adapter on the process shape to your field which must be filled by using code or logic.

  -Kevin

• Notification does not send when supply is triggered by the access policy

  Hello
  
  I implemented a notification when a user is created in the ad. In fact the mail is sent when I set up the resource through the administration interface. I have an access policy that may trigger the commissioning of the AD resource; but in this case, no mail is sent.
  
  What I want to achieve, send an email to someone (not the usermanager nor the plaintiff fields) when the AD account is provisionned. I have put an assignment to a user and check the assignment, but no mail is sent if the resource is supplied via the access policy.
  
  Thanks in advance for your help

  I solved this problem by writing custom process tasks 'send Email Notification on creation of the user'...

  In the Java Code of the adapter, I read the values of the "Mail server", IT resource and my custom message template definition...

  (Using tcITResourceOperationsIntf and tcEmailDefinitionOperationsIntf)

  Then, using the OOTB class in mail.jar and xlDataObjects.jar, I sent the email...

  import com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcEmailNotificationUtil;

  tcEmailNotificationUtil emailNotificationUtil = new tcEmailNotificationUtil (dataProvider);

  emailNotificationUtil.constructEmail (emailTemplateName);

  emailNotificationUtil.sendEmail (toEmailAddress);

  Since simply assigning this task to that specific user sends notification by e-mail to this user, trigger this task 'Send Email Notification on creation of the user' too with the task you want to assign to this user... that is to trigger the two tasks at the same time... It is simply divide (a solution) of the functionality of the original task

• [IOM 9.1.0.2] Being evaluated to a disabled IOM user access policy.

  Hi gurus,
  
  I have an access under evaluation strategy and provision of resources (AD) of the IOM disabled user.
  
  Any information on what I should check?
  
  Thanks in advance.

  There is a system property

  XL. EvaluateMembershipForInactiveUser

  Make sure the access policy is applied to users inactive too true

  It's in9.1.0.2BP14