What is the dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access?

Similar Questions

• What is the network access Protection Agent and when should it be on?

  It seems to be disabled by default in the Action Center Security Section.  What does if it is turned on?

  Hello

  The network access Protection agent service collects and manages health information for client computers on a network. The information collected by the NAP agent are used to ensure that the client computer has the required software and settings. If a client computer is not compatible with the health policy, it can be equipped with restricted network access until their configuration is updated. Depending on the configuration of health policies, client computers may be automatically refreshed allowing users to quickly regain full network access without having to manually update the computer. By default, the startup type of Network Access Protection (NAP), agent service is manual under services.msc.

  See also:
  What is the network access Protection?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/what-is-network-access-protection
  Networking of information that it pros

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/networking-information-for-it-pros

• What is the dynamic property used to retrieve the IP address of the CV?

  What is the dynamic property used to retrieve the IP address of the CV?

  If we get as below as we get VM kernel Port Group

  HostSystem - & gt; HostListSummary - & gt; managementServerIp

  But how do we get Service Console port group?

  Let me know thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Is your VC a harware installed or is installed in a virtual machine?

  If it is based on a material maybe you can retrieve it with

  ->->-> HostNetworkInfo HostNetworkSystem HostConfigManager HostSystem (or config)

  There is a portgroup HostPortGroup entity, but I'm a noob and never did.

  Maybe it helps.

  Christian

• Unable to provision of a receiver Office via the IOM access policy

  Hi all
  
  We have created a group membership and attaches it to an access policy that is put in service of a particular ro.
  When we try to use it, the procurement process gets stuck in the State of 'system Validation '.
  
  However, manual commissioning works perfectly well.
  
  The server is looking for something while he tries to provision?
  
  Thank you!

  http://rajivdewan.blogspot.com/2010/07/system-validation-with-pending-status.html

• What is the network access Protection?

  What is the simplest and most effective way to protect a home/business wireless network? (Other than WEP or WPA encryption).

  Hello RickMetta,

  Thanks for your post.  There are many methods that can help secure your wireless network.  Take a look at some of the literature that I've linked below:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/security/wireless.mspx

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/home-wireless.aspx

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb530679.aspx

  See you soon

• Limit of the dynamic access policies?

  Hello

  Is there a maximum number of DAP supported by ASA 55XX 9.1?

  Thanks for your information

  Patrick

  Patrick,

  No policy limit is imposed, but less than 100 is recommended (for high-end deployments). Realistically 20-50 is what we see in the more advanced deployments.

  Impose us limits on the amount of attributes (999) in DAP.

  M.

• How to map a dynamic access to a group policy strategy?

  Experts,

  I'm doing an SSL implementation and a part of the requirement is to have the authentication of users in LDAP, are mapped to a particular group policy. They need this mapping for a particular bookmark assigned to them, because they are strictly using the WEBVPN portal. I have several DAP is configured and I want to map the user that is matched for each DAP, to a particular group policy. I read you can use the LDAP attributes on the user account in AD, but I want to map the DAP "mortgage" in Group Policy "mortgage", as opposed to reading additional AD attributes of the user. Is this possible?

  DAP and group policy are two ways to implement access control on the remote access vpn client.

  DAP must take precedence over group strategy.

  When the responses from the LDAP server for authentication request with the LDAP group member attribute, you can map this attribute of joining a DAP folder or a group policy.

  If you want to map the LDAP group member attribute to group policy, you must set the attribute LDAP map. Please see the example below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808d1a7c.shtml

  If you want to map the attribute for LDAP group membership in politics of the DAP, you will find the guide in ASDM

  Edit-> Advanced-> Guide dynamic access policy.

  The below is copied from the guide above.

  Example of composition of group

  You can create a basic logical expression for the special criteria of belonging to an AD Group. Because users can belong to several groups, DAP analyzes the response from the LDAP server in separate fields in a table. You need an advanced feature to accomplish the following:

  • Compare the memberOf a string field (in which case the user belongs to a group).

  • Iterate over each field returned memberOf if the data returned is of type "table".

  The function that we have written and tested for this purpose is shown below. In this example, if a user is a member of a group, ending by "-stu" they correspond to the DAP.

  assert(function()
  
         local pattern = "-stu$"
  
         local attribute = aaa.ldap.memberOf
  
         if ((type(attribute) == "string") and
  
             (string.find(attribute, pattern) ~= nil)) then
  
             return true
  
         elseif (type(attribute) == "table") then
  
             local k, v
  
             for k, v in pairs(attribute) do
  
                 if (string.find(v, pattern) ~= nil) then
  
                     return true
  
                 end
  
             end
  
         end
  
         return false
  
      end)()
  
      

• Access Policy Update or Revoke AD does not

  Hello
  
  Problem:
  
  I'm automating the AD Provisioning user via the IOM access policy. I am able to provision users in AD, but the user is not visible in the "resources" tab. If something is updated the IOM attributes and are not transfer of IOM to your user AD process. If I removed the user role, the user was not revoked the pub.
  
  Configuration:
  
  I created the following task to automate the configuration of the user. They are
  
  (1) rule
  Name: All users of the AD
  Rule criteria: user login! = NULL
  
  (2) role
  
  Name: AD role
  Member ship rule: all users of the AD
  
  (3) access policy:
  
  Access policy information
  
  Name of access policy: access AD policy
  Access Policy Description: Access AD policy
  With approval: No.
  Renovation of access policy: Yes
  Priority: 1
  
  Resources to be put in service by this access policy
  
  Name of the resource: AD user
  Revoke resource and entitlement (s) If is no longer applies: checked
  Forms of process: AD user details
  User AD form details are fed by pre-fill adapter in create and change < FieldName > fill in update operation.
  
  Role
  Name: AD role
  
  I could not see any error in the log of AD connector file.
  
  What I want to do something outside of politics to access AD to view resources in the resource TAB and also update the attributes of the user (process of change tasks are configured) and Revoke.
  
  
  Help is greatly appreciated.

  What do you mean by this statement:

  But the user is not visible in the "resources" tab

  Do you mean that when you go to resource a user profile, then you can not see that AD user is provisioned to this user?

  Check the checkbox "Auto Save" on "AD User" process Defintion
  Add a user in this role explicitly in this role/group

  Resources to be put in service by this access policy

  I hope you give values for AD server and the name of the Organization in the form of courses in this section.
  Allow the newspapers as well as user AD spots are called or not

  And

  To send the attributes changed to AD, you create corresponding tasks such as change of name, change last name etc in the defintion of user AD process and made its entry in the search for relaxation?
  If yes then it will work only when you see AD user configured/active status in the profile of the user of resources

  Let me know the results

• Using the dynamic keyword in front of a class

  Hello

  I have seen a few examples on Flex, where when you create a ValueObject with ActionScript, they specify the dynamic Word before

  the class.

  See, for example, the code below.

  public dynamic class Employee
  {

  private var name: String;

  private var age: String;

  
  

  public void Employee()
  {
  }

  }

  Thank you.

  If your question is probably what is the dynamic keyword?

  Flex 3 livedocs is your friend: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=03_Language_and_Syntax_10.html

• Question of dynamic access Cisco policy

  I have my cisco ASA pulling active directory. So far I have only deployed vpn without client for intranet access. But iin test I have cisco anyconnect vpn works also from active directory. I would like to give different levels of access to the anyconnect vpn. I've been messing around with dynamic access policies. However, when I create a new policy and map it to the users group in the AD and the access network list, then I click Finish on the dfltaccesspolicy, I can connect is no longer in the clientlessvpn. I gave my DAP policy a priority 2147483647 I read was the highest, but it still does not work. What I am doing wrong?

  Thanks in advance for your help

  Awesome Neal!

  Thanks for sharing about how you solved your problem with others is the idea of this great forum.

  Please mark this message as answered.

  Have a good.

• Bought more Adobe Photoshop CS on Amazon with the key! What it will not accept my registration SR #. How can apply me this correctly!

  Bought more Adobe Photoshop CS on Amazon with the key! What it will not accept my registration SR #. How can apply me this correctly!

  CS? or CS3: CS6?  If this is the CS, it is worthless.

  The CS/CS2 activation servers have been removed. Download CS2 and use the new number given to the right of the download link.

  ml https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/Policy-Pricing/Creative-Suite-2-activation-end-Life.HT

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two "listener: Dynamic &amp; static record.

  Hello
  What are the advantages and disadvantages of dynamic registration of the listener?
  and
  What are the advantages and disadvantages of the static recording of the listener?
  
  Thank you
  Uday

  Some facilities (for example, restart with the Data Guard Broker) will not work unless you appropriate defne registered staticly service. Other facilities (failover of such service) do not work unless you use a dynamically registered service.
  Decide what you want to implement and configure registration accordingly. There is no "advantages and disadvantages".

• Notification does not send when supply is triggered by the access policy

  Hello
  
  I implemented a notification when a user is created in the ad. In fact the mail is sent when I set up the resource through the administration interface. I have an access policy that may trigger the commissioning of the AD resource; but in this case, no mail is sent.
  
  What I want to achieve, send an email to someone (not the usermanager nor the plaintiff fields) when the AD account is provisionned. I have put an assignment to a user and check the assignment, but no mail is sent if the resource is supplied via the access policy.
  
  Thanks in advance for your help

  I solved this problem by writing custom process tasks 'send Email Notification on creation of the user'...

  In the Java Code of the adapter, I read the values of the "Mail server", IT resource and my custom message template definition...

  (Using tcITResourceOperationsIntf and tcEmailDefinitionOperationsIntf)

  Then, using the OOTB class in mail.jar and xlDataObjects.jar, I sent the email...

  import com.thortech.xl.dataobj.util.tcEmailNotificationUtil;

  tcEmailNotificationUtil emailNotificationUtil = new tcEmailNotificationUtil (dataProvider);

  emailNotificationUtil.constructEmail (emailTemplateName);

  emailNotificationUtil.sendEmail (toEmailAddress);

  Since simply assigning this task to that specific user sends notification by e-mail to this user, trigger this task 'Send Email Notification on creation of the user' too with the task you want to assign to this user... that is to trigger the two tasks at the same time... It is simply divide (a solution) of the functionality of the original task

• several resources configured by the access policy, allow multiple set to no

  Hi Experts,
  
  I have a problem with the automatic supply of the resource based access policy Ad and Exchange resource (or any two resources that are dependent on each other).
  
  That's what I'm doing (11.1.1.3 bp2):
  The user of the ad and the Exchange are the two auto-save, auto - prefill and do not allow several. Exchange depends on the AD Server (which assigns the user ad). Based on a rule, the user gets a role, having an access policy giving the user of the ad server and Exchange resources.
  
  Because my AD Server/user implementation updates the user profile during deployment of the access policy is either revalued. At this point the resource Exchange has not any State yet, even if it is waiting on the AD resource to be configured. Accordingly, another Exchange resource is added to a kind of queue, no AD resource yet again in a wait state. As soon as the resource AD is supplied all the wait resource Exchange are provided leading to many Exchange resources.
  
  On a side note, when a resource is assigned manually in the interface web IOM, that once all void tasks are made (or failed) the resource appears on the tab "resources" for a user. I think it would be more logical that this resource is listed immediately to the provision of status. Maybe it's to be able to perform a restore or validation occurs only after all the tasks are performed.
  Bundle 4 Patch did not help at all.
  
  Suggestions are welcome.
  
  Kind regards
  
  Jan Willem Beusink

  Hello

  Thank you, we did the debug more. The real problem was setting a value on the profile of the user, by a membership rule added a user to a different role, leading to the evaluation of access policies. in the process of AD in combination with prepopulators on the Exchange form that take time to complete (a few seconds). If Exchange prepops where not ready before access where assessed to new policies, we got two exchange resources. We solved the problem by using (a variant of) your suggestion leaving the task of Exchange processes a UDF and adapt the rule to check for this field's initial membership.

  Hi low (member of the team of Jan Willem)

• Flash Access Manager: create the update list policy generates SERIOUS: Servlet.service () Exception

  I have created a new policy and want to broadcast its existence to our server to access the Flash, but using the list of update of political strategy-> add-> create a list updated policy, I have an error message (Note: the only parameters different when comparing the new policy to the RFA - policy.pol is the addition of the HDCP Encryption tab right to play) :

  The server encountered an internal error () that prevents to satisfy this demand. java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException exceptions : 2

  com.adobe.flashaccess.refimpl.userinterface.UICommunicator.createPolicyUpdateList (UICommu nicator.java:817)

  com.adobe.flashaccess.refimpl.userinterface.UICommunicator.doPost (UICommunicator.java:145)

  javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)

  javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)

  It is also registered by Tomcat:

  February 1, 2012 12:57:57 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve invoke

  SERIOUS: Servlet.service () for servlet UICommunicator threw the exception

  java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2

  at com.adobe.flashaccess.refimpl.userinterface.UICommunicator.createPolicyUpdateList (UICommu nicator.java:817)

  at com.adobe.flashaccess.refimpl.userinterface.UICommunicator.doPost (UICommunicator.java:145)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter (ApplicationFilterChain.j ava: 290)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)

  at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)

  at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)

  at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:845)

  at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$ Http11ConnectionHandler.process (Http11Protocol.ja goes: 583)

  to org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$ Worker.run (JIoEndpoint.java:447)

  at java.lang.Thread.run (unknown Source)

  Here are a few screenshots with all my settings Flash of Access Manager:

  

  

  

  

  -EDIT: MORE INFO.

  I also tried to creating policy using command line tools, specifically the AdobePolicyManager.jar by using the following:

  java-jar AdobePolicyManager.jar new poltest.pol o - x w 210240 - opAnalog NO_PLAYBACK - opDigital NO_PLAYBACK

  with my flashaccesstools.properties configured. (I can reach so useful)

  The policy is created, but the errors of content about authentication during playback.

  Content plays successfully when encrypting using the default ad - policy.pol, but new policies do not seem to be recognized by FAX3, and I can't get them to be recognized correctly.

  Post edited by: Derek J Entringer

  This is now solved. Policies were properly created, and the content was being encryption properly.

  The problem occurred because the Protection of output type was not matching what has been implemented within our Treaty custom authentication backend.