API for access policy

Similar Questions

• Native API for contacts

  Does anyone know where is placed description of API for access to the address book of contacts native?

  you would probably do it with contact service, https://developer.blackberry.com/cascades/reference/bb__pim__contacts__contactservice.html

  as a familiar type of SQL CRUD system, I think it would be quite simple

• Resource not available for selection in the access policy

  
  Hello

  I'm working on OIM11g R2 PS2 explore all of the new features available.

  I created a resource COMPUTING (SunONE_Resource) for the provision to users of SunONE (using the connector of the OID ) and got users provisioned it successfully asking for it by the Instance of the Application. Now I want to do it Auto-mis in service. So, I created a single policy role and access. But in step 2 of the access policy where we Julie IT resource, my resource (SunONE_Resource) IT is not visible and is the resource available only: LDAP User. I have selected LDAP user as a resource and create access policy.

  But when I'm allocating the specific role of the user, the user does not have configured my SunONE resource.

  I have run the Task Scheduler to assess access policies manually as well.

  Please help me in this regard.

  Kind regards

  Maryse

  Thanks for your quick response.

  I have fixed the problem. The problem was there 2 political access do the same thing. Thus, the system searches for a system property: XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning and it has been set to false.

  So, I changed the settings to another AP who was who collide with mine. Then it worked.

• Policy approval 11 GR 2 IOM for access rights policy

  I have gurus,

  I'm trying to define a policy on approval (or a couple to demand and operational levels) to ask BeneficiaryManager (default wf) to approve a payment (Group OUD) assigned by an access policy.

  I have a couple of policies for approval that run perfetctly when a user manually asked for equal rights, I'd get approval even when the access policy assigns (task ' To evaluate user policies ' currently running).

  I tried different configurations of trust policy, but I've always had the right to assign without asking for approval. Of course, the AccessPolicy has = YES "with approval".

  Many thanks and best regards.

  I suggest you always have an automatic approval to the level of demand.  This level does not take into account the specific resource.  It's like the approval Standard since version 9 x.

  With regard to your rules, if you create the query as a type 'Access Policy based Provisioning' you should not need to put in your political access rule is based.  Instead, describe what instance of resource/application that's in your rules.

  -Kevin

• Access policy for the user whose status is "disabled until the start date.

  Hello
  
  By default political access does not work for the user whose start date is later in OIM 11 g. I have an access policy that the provisions of all users of Xellerate OID. This policy is not work for users who start date is later, i.e. status = disabled until the start date.
  
  No workaround to make the strategy work is much appreciated.
  
  
  
  Thank you
  GYAN

  up to 10g it work very well if you put provisining date as the current date. But, you cannot apply even in oim 11g

  Try below

  Add new udf to the user profile
  reconcile the start date in the new udf and leave the start of oim null date
  In this case the access policy will be triggers and you will be able to get an account created to the OID, and then set the start workflow OID IOM

  for reminder and all just to add trigger for the new udf and update on the changes.

  Note: In your case as OID in disable State it will cause no problem after the user status "disable up to that Start Date. If the resource object in activate State and change you the status to disable up to that starting date, it does not fire disable the user trigger.

  Kind regards
  Mireille nayan

• Provisioning of users of automated Seggregate using Access Policy-Diff groups/Org

  Hello
  
  By default, users created in IOM - via GTC / via self-registration / via administrator - they all are assigned to the "All Users" group Can we assign these users to another group, defined by the user, for example "trialgroup", default and Unassign the group "All Users". If so, how can we do?
  
  This issue is related to another question of mine:
  
  I want to avoid all the users that are created in the IOM system - to be all together put in service to a single IT resource in my case OID directly via the access policy that can be applied to each group. I want to keep the system extensible for future purposes. And the only way is to the provision of resources direct seggregate via access through different 'groups' strategy. So the solution I could think about was to assign all users who are currently created (via GTC and via the load mass in IOM) to a separate group and assign a policy of access to the group so that in the future if another resource comes into picture then the system can be extended by creating more groups and design of individual to separate for the same access policies.
  
  Is it makes sense?
  
  Please provide your inputs! Advice/suggestions/ideas are welcome.
  
  TIA,
  -oidm.

  I'm actually not sure, what you want to achieve form the content of this post. If you mean that you don't want each user to IOM to be configured in OID automatically via the access policy, then I suppose that in this case you aplly the ALL_USERS group access strategy.

  Well I miss the flow of your question, but here's what you can based on my understanding:

  (1) forget the ALL_USERS group. We cannot do anything about it. Any created user will be a part of this group, and you cannot delete a user in this group.
  (2) instead of what you can do is create another group, such as trialgroup and all users a member of this group as well. It would be simple to do. See the next step. Use the addMemberUser() of addMemberUser interface API.
  (3) create an adapter of the entity with an added javatask, which takes a username entry and assigns this user to this group (trialgroup) in the use of the IOM above API. Mount this adaptation for the trigger for insertion after the Manager of data objects "users." (He also has an other entity ootb adapter that adds all users to the Group of ALL_USERS).

  (4) attach your strategy of access to this group.
  (5) now you are also free to expand your system by creating more groups and access policies. It shouldn't be a problem.

  Thank you

  Sunny

• Parental Controls + Internet Access Policy 'Add' is shaded on

  I need to add several new devices to my "target devices" in the Parental control-Internet access policy and program schedules that devices can get online. But my 'Add' is shaded out and I'm not allowed to add devices. I use the browser to log in to the router.

  To manage access to the Internet, you have two methods available, Parental control and Internet access policy. That a method can be used at a time. So my first question which option you are trying to use to block or plan the Internet access?

  As the Parental controls can restrict internet access for up to five computers or devices. You can block access to the internet or to limit it to specific times, and you can also block specific Web sites.

  So if you have several devices then 5 to add then you should use the political Internet access option.

• API for UDP multicast and UPnP

  Hi all

  I'm a newbie in the development of Blackberry,

  what I need is to implement the UPnP protocol stack.

  Can someone kindly tell me that, don't the JDE provides the api for UPnP directly? or the api for "MulticastSocket" or "Connection UDP Multicast", which is used by UPnP?

  Thanks in advance!

  

  No, you do not get access to any BlackBerry of additional APIs ISV BlackBerry Alliance member.

• API for the identity of the BB device

  Hello, in my business each device is enabled on BES by e-mail account. Is this possible with the API 5.0.0 and less than get this e-mail address => for example. The device was activated using [email protected] on BES. Is there a way to get this email? If this isn't the case, provide BES service (webservice,...) that would resolve this email by sending the PIN (DeviceInfo.getdeviceID ()) to this service? Thank you Joe380 PS is there an API to access the data, whereas the device identity?

  Try this

  Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance();
  if (session != null) {
      Store store = session.getStore();
      ServiceConfiguration serviceConfig = store.getServiceConfiguration();
  
  String emailAddress = serviceConfig.getEmailAddress();
  

• What is the dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access?

  Can Hi anyone explain the following? I examine documents Cisco Anyconnect SSL VPN. It does not have these commands. What is the relationship of the Anyconnect VPN with these commands? Or send a link. Thank you

  -----

  dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access

  Description 'access ABC '.

  WebVPN

  the value of the URL - list A_Intranet, ABC_Access

  SVC request to enable default svc

  --------------------

  I checked the document from Cisco, which say:

  Operating instructions

  Use the dynamic-access-policy-record command in configuration mode global to create one or more DAP records. When you use this command, you dynamic-access-policy-record mode, in which you can set attributes for the record named the DAP. The commands that you can use dynamic-access-policy-recording mode are:

  • Action (continue, terminate or quarantine)
  • Description
  • network-acl
  • priority
  • message from the user
  • WebVPN

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/ASA-command-reference/...

  That is - this to create one or more DAP records for?

  Please see the following guide for a good overview and details on the use and deployment of DAP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

• 5.2 ACS access policy

  Hello

  could you recommend me how I accomplish the following task, I need to configure ACS 5.2 to authenticate WIRELESS users.

  There are two types of users: users in domain and not domain users.  I want to authenticate users in domain with PEAP-MSCHAPv2.

  And no domain users, I want to authenticate the host lookup (MAC).

  The question is how to properly organize access policy? I need to access several services or access service will be sufficient.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Your understanding is very close but MAB to work to work with wireless users, you need to activate the option for mac filtering to the SSID. This setting is global and will always trigger unlike port based authentication where you can define a sequence of authentication.

  You can create a service and strategy with which you can leave several policies. For the parameters of the identity of this policy, you will need to create an identity store sequence so that either AD is used first, then the internal hosts serves as a second, or vice versa. For the identity parameter, you need to set the indicator not found user to continue.

  Let me know if it works.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani

  Please rate if useful!

• Access policy - value of the attribute of provisioning failure

  Hello

  is it possible to configure a value for the attribute of non-entitlement to access policy applies to all users? I changed a strategy of access and successfully implemented a change in the rights of the system target, but did not at the disposal of another value of the attribute (by changing the form of target system in the definition of the access policy).

  Peter

  In this case, you will need to write your own custom code and need to trigger as an adapter of task of process or event handlers.

  ~ J

• Harvest access policy does not

  Hello

  I'm accommodating a target system LDAP connected to IOM 11 GR 2 PS2 and I would like to use the political feature of harvest. I reconciled an account and it's target (rights) system roles in IOM and I waited this work to "Evaluate the user policies" would be given a role of IOM corresponding to the user (based on the system of law and the target defined in the access policy). But it doesn't work--not even after setting manual USER_PROVISIONING_ATTRS explicit. POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED = 1 (in the comic book) - after the work performed to the value of POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED is 0, but there is no association between the user account and the corresponding IOM role (I expect that this is the result of the harvest of the access policy).

  My setup - I set the cfg attributes XL system. AllowAPHarvesting, XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning to access TRUE, corresponding policy must be harvested system target filled in and also the corresponding payment is defined in the policy. Retro indicator is on. I did not set the discriminator to account for the target system because there is max one account per user in the target system LDAP.

  Can you help me identify the reason why the harvest is not working?

  Peter

  Hello

  Evaluate user policies does not associate a role of IOM with the user.

  The following post associate old user role:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E40329_01/admin.1112/e27149/Scheduler.htm#OMADM738

  Refresh the role memberships

  It assesses the role memberships and assigns users to roles based on rules. This work evaluates all the roles which the composition rules have changed since the last work performed and their immediate assessment have not been chosen by the administrator.

  None

  Yes

  ~ J

• Access policy owner OIM 11 G PS3

  Hello

  During the creation of the OIM 11 g PS3 access strategy, you can specify the owner of the policy. What is the use of this field and how does it serve practically?

  Thank you

  Access policy owner

  In this version, access policy owner has no any special privileges. The policy configuration UI access are available in the Administration of identity system, only system administrators can access this feature. There is also no authorization from added control of access policy of API access management policy owners.

  Reference: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E52734_01/oim/OMADM/accesspolicies.htm#OMADM3124

• API to access an external database

  Is it at all possible to implement an API that will allow me to access and write to a database puts off the BC server. I need to include multiple forms requiring reading and writing abilities in the same form. I was jumping to connect to the Rackspace or Azure MS SQL Server. Anyone who has tried to do something like that?

  British Colombia has REST API for apps and soon 3rd party access and SOAP API currently has:

  http://docs.BusinessCatalyst.com/developers/API