837 routers not reconnected to VPN concentrator

Similar Questions

• VPN concentrator + PIX on LAN-> customers can not reach local servers

  Hello

  I have a problem wrt. remote access clients coming via a VPN3000 concentrator and trying to access local servers.

  For the topology:

  The internal network is 10.0.1.0/24. It connects with the outside world, as well as via a PIX DMZ; the PIX has 10.0.1.1 in the internal network.

  On the same LAN (internal), I have the VPN concentrator for the inside address 10.0.1.5. It assigns addresses in the 10.0.100.0/24 range to the

  VPN client-PCs.

  I can sucessfully connect using the VPN client SW to the hub, i.e. remote access clients out addresses

  the 10.0.100.0/24 range.

  The problem: access from VPN clients to internal network is * not * possible; for example, a customer with 10.0.100.1 cannot connect to

  internal to the 10.0.1.28 server.

  To my knowledge, this is a routing problem because the server (10.0.1.28) has no idea on how to reach customers in

  10.0.100.0/24. The only thing that the server is a default static route pointing to the PIX, i.e. 10.0.1.1.

  So I set up a static route on the PIX for 10.0.100.0 pointing to the hub-VPN, that is

  Mylan route 10.0.100.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.5 1

  This does not solve my problem though.

  In the PIX logs, I see the entries as follows:

  % 3 PIX-106011: deny entering (no xlate) tcp src trainee: 10.0.1.28 (atlas) / 445 intern dst: 10.0.100.1 (pending) 1064

  The PIX seems to abandon return packages, i.e. traffic from the server back to the client

  To my knowledge, the problem seems to be:

  Short traffic VPN - client-> Concentrator VPN-> Server-> PIX - where it gets moved.

  My reasoning: the PIX only sees the package back, i.e. the package back from the server to the client - and therefore decreasing the

  package because he has not seen the package from the client to the server.

  So here are my questions:

  (o) how do I configure the PIX that I be connectivity between my remote VPN clients (10.0.100.0/24) and

  computers servers on the local network (10.0.1.0/24)?

  (o) someone else you have something like this going?

  PS: Please note that the first obvious idea, installation of static routes on all machines on the local network is not an option here.

  Thank you very much in advance for your help,.

  -ewald

  Hello, PIX the because can not route traffic on the same interface (prior to version 7.0 anyway), I suggest you two places your hub to the outside with the inside of the legs on a zone demilitarized or (if you can not do a makeover of the network) you remove your pool with 10.0.100.0 - addresses and create a pool with 10.0.1.0 - addresses which is a part of the address space. No, NOT all. A little book that it is not used inside.

  Best regards

  Robert Maras

• problem of traffic flow with tunnel created the network with a tunnel to a VPN concentrator

  Hi, I worked with Cisco and the seller for 2 weeks on this.II am hoping that what we are witnessing will ring a Bell with someone.

  Some basic information:

  I work at a seller who needs from one site to the other tunnel.  There are currently 1 site to another with the seller using a Juniper SSG, which works without incident in my system.  I'm transitioning to routers Cisco 2811 and put in place a new tunnel with the seller for the 2800 uses a different public ip address in my address range.  So my network has 2 tunnels with the provider that uses a Cisco VPN concentrator.  The hosts behind the tunnel use 20x.x.x.x public IP addresses.

  My Cisco router will create a tunnel, but I can't not to hosts on the network of the provider through the Cisco 2811, but I can't get through the tunnel of Juniper.  The seller sees my packages and provider host meets them and sends them to the tunnel.  They never reach the external interface on my Cisco router.

  I'm from the external interface so that my endpoint and the peers are the same IP address.  (note, I tried to do a static NAT and have an address of tunnel and my different host to the same result.)  Cisco has confirmed that I do have 2 addresses different and this configuration was a success with the creation of another successful tunnels toa different network.)

  I tested this configuration on a network of transit area before moving the router to the production network and my Cisco 2811 has managed to create the tunnel and ping the inside host.  Once we moved the router at camp, we can no longer ping on the host behind the seller tunnel.   The seller assured me that the tunnel setting is exactly the same, and he sees his host to send traffic to the tunnel.  The seller seems well versed with the VPN concentrator and manages connections for many customers successfully.

  The seller has a second VPN concentrator on a separate network and I can connect to this VPN concentrator with success of the Cisco 2811 who is having problems with the hub, which has also a tunnel with Gin.

  Here is what we have done so far:

  (1) confirm the config with the help of Cisco 2811.  The tunnel is up.  SH cyrpto ipa wristwatch tunnel upward.
  (2) turn on Nat - T side of the tunnel VPN landscapers
  (3) confirm that the traffic flows properly a tunnel on another network (which would indicate that the Cisco config is ok)
  (4) successfully, tunnel and reach a different configuration hosting
  (5) to confirm all the settings of tunnel with the seller
  (6) the seller confirmed that his side host has no way and that it points to the default gateway
  (7) to rebuild the tunnel from scratch
  8) confirm with our ISP that no way divert traffic elsewhere.  My gateway lSP sees my directly connected external address.
  (9) confirm that the ACL matches with the seller
  (10) I can't get the Juniper because he is in production and in constant use

  Is there a known issue with the help of a VPN concentrator to connect to 2 tunnels on the same 28 network range?

  Options or ideas are welcome.  I had countless sessions with Cisco webex, but do not have access to the hub of the seller.  I can forward suggestions.

  Here's a code

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  Crypto ipsec transform-set mytrans aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 30
  Set transform-set RIGHT

  ISAKMP crypto key address No.-xauth

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE $ 0/0
  IP 255.255.255.240
  IP access-group 107 to
  IP access-group out 106
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  crypto mymap map

  logging of access lists (applied outside to get an idea of what will happen.  No esp traffic happens, he has never hits)

  allowed access list 106 esp host host newspaper
  106 ip access list allow a whole
  allowed access list 107 esp host host Journal
  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal

  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal
  107 ip access list allow a whole

  Crypto isa HS her
  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    QM_IDLE ASSETS 0 1010

  "Mymap" ipsec-isakmp crypto map 1
  Peer =.
  Extend the 116 IP access list
  access - list 116 permit ip host host (which is a public IP address))
  Current counterpart:
  Life safety association: 4608000 kilobytes / 2800 seconds
  PFS (Y/N): N
  Transform sets = {}
  myTrans,
  }

  OK - so I have messed around the lab for 20 minutes and came up with the below (ip are IP test:-)

  (4) ip nat pool crypto-nat 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 prefix length 30 <> it comes to the new address of NAT

  !
  (1) ip nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload <> it comes to the interface by default NAT

  !
  IP nat inside source map route overload of crypto-nat of crypto-nat pool <> it is the policy of the NAT function

  !

  (6) access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> defines the IP source and destination traffic

  !

  (2) access-list 102 deny ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not NAT the normal communication

  (3) access-list 102 deny ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not re - NAT NAT

  (1) access-list 102 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any <> allows everyone else to use the IP Address of the interface for NAT

  !

  (5) crypto-nat route-map permit 5 <> condition for the specific required NAT
  corresponds to the IP 101 <> game of traffic source and destination IP must be NAT'td

  (7) access list 103 permit ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> crypto acl

  Then, how the works above, when a package with the what IP 172.16.1.0/24 source wants to leave the router to connect to google, say the source will change to IP interface (1).  When 172.16.1.0/24 wants to talk to172.16.2.0/24, it does not get translated (2).  When the remote end traffic equaled the following clause of NAT - the already NAT'td IP will not be affected again (3) when a host 172.16.1.0/24 wants to communicate with 172.16.2.20/24 we need a NAT NAT specific pool is required (4).  We must define a method of specific traffic to apply the NAT with a roadmap (5) which applies only when the specific traffic (6), then simply define the interesting traffic to the VPN to initiate and enable comms (7) corresponding

• What has replaced the vpn concentrator?

  Greenhorn here, I was not to sit in this place.  We have three remote sites, sister of institutions, we share an app with.  Host us the app.  A site has a configuration of vpn concentrator, the other two use a leased from point to point line. They each have a router that connects to a single router.  They want to replace the lines leased by using a vpn.  Do the digging, I see that the hubs are EOL.

  So, what is used to replace the hub today?  What is a solution today from leased lines? They are all poor profit. My guess is that they will say look on Ebay for a hub if the solution is too expensive.

  Thanks Jim

  Jim

  The package of security (CISCO2901-SEC/K9 or CISCO2921-SEC/K9) is the convenient way to get the combination of the router, the software and licenses you will need. I don't think that you need something more elaborate than one of these security packages.

  I think one of these would be a good choice for you. It's been a while since I looked at the details of these routers. My recollection is that the 2921 offers more power, more interfaces and a few other benefits and would be attractive to many of us. But I think I understand your needs, I believe that the 2901 router cheaper and quite adequate for you.

  HTH

  Rick

• aid required for the image backup vpn concentrator

  Hi, I am unable to download the vpn concentrator ios image to the tftp server. is someone can pls tell me what is the procedure for that. I can't find good documentation on it. pls help someone.

  concerning

  Assane

  Assane,

  You try to save the image of the hub to the VPN concentrator. Like the 4.7.2.D or the version E or F of the code. If this is the case, it is not possible to copy the image file from the hub to the tftp server.

  You must download the CEC file.

  He had an answer to your question earlier, but it pointed you on how to make a backup of your CONFIGURATION file.

  If this answers your question, feel free to write it down.

• 3015 VPN concentrator Version help

  The 3015 comes not only as no redundant hw together? If not, how do I know which version I have?

  I don't have the CD of VPN client supplied with the appliance, can it be downloaded or bought?

  Thanks for any help.

  Jeff

  The 3015 comes with no card encryption HW (SEPs). This is the same chassis as the 3030, 3060 and 3080, the only difference between the models is the memoy in the box and how many MS and feeds they included. The 3015 allows you to upgrade to a more powerful area by simple addition of MS, but as is, it's basically empty.

  The client code and the VPN concentrator here are downloadable from EAC:

  http://www.Cisco.com/Kobayashi/SW-Center/SW-VPN.shtml

  You will need a CCO login that has access to this page.

• Download the firmware from the 3030 VPN concentrator?

  Hello

  I would like to download a newer firmware our vpn concentrator but wish to download a copy of the old firmware. Is this possible and how can I do? It seems that the only option is to download, as well as a fall on a document that indicate how to go back but still doesn't explain not how can I get a copy of the old firmware. Thank you

  I think that Cisco pulls some of the older minor revisions out of the web for major versions when the image becomes a bit old. 3.5 (3), you should be fine with 3.6 (which is available for download). You cannot copy the picture from the hub as far as I know.

• Cisco VPN concentrator 3005

  FW 4.1.7r

  I can't the https management work on the device.  The event logs tell something, of not being able to add the ssl certificate to the private interface.  I tried to turn on/off box https without success.  I also restarted the device.

  Anything else I can try?

  You can check if the self-signed certificate VPN concentrator has expired.

  It will be under the Administration--> Management of certificates

• VPN concentrator 3005 - problem of IP attribution

  I have a strange problem with the VPN concentrator 3005. I have the private interface configured with 192.168.3.3/24 as the ip address. For all the users I assign an ip address from the same network (for example) 192.168.3.105/24 or use an IP address pool (192.168.3.100 - 192.168.3.150) the connection fails and the hub will specify that it cannot assign an ip address to the client.

  However, if I configure the user address pool or a client on a subnet different it works and the user GET connected. For example, 192.168.2.105/24. I hit him a back-end switch and do not really want to have to add a router to talk between subnets.

  Am I missing something?

  Any help is appreciated!

  Alan,

  It is recommended to assign another pool of IP addresses for VPN clients to internal network.

  Although it is not recommended, you should be able to assign a Pool of IP addresses that is part of the same internal network and it should work. The only thing that you must be aware of, is that this range of IP addresses assigned to customers should not be used on the internal network

  You can post the VPN3000 logs when its not able to assign an IP address to the VPN Client.

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

  * Please note all useful messages *.

• 501 to 3000 PIX VPN concentrator

  I know that a lot of these configs have been covered here and have read a few today. Here's my dilemma.

  We have a VPN concentrator in our GOING to Florida. We set up a remote site of contract in another State. The customer is what allows us to place our PIX 501 on their (private) network and out to the internet to return to our VPN concentrator. According to the staff of the company, you have to cross a their corporate firewall. We have assigned a private to our internal ethernet IP address and has assigned a private one for us to use on our external interface on the PIX. The two private investigation periods are in the 192.168.129.x/24 (our inside) and 192.168.96.x/26 (on the outside provided by customer)

  Initially, they were to provide a public IP address peer with against our public IP hub. Now, they are unable to do so.

  They provided a possible PAT range of public IP addresses to go against, but there is no way of knowing what particular IP peer against. Is it possible to be able to point the VPN concentrator for a range of public IP addresses and hope a peers. I can ping from the PIX coming out to our public address of VPN concentrators. Any help would be appreciated.

  We configure ezvpn, however, the problem is that the vpn tunnel can only be activated from the pix not starting from the hub.

• Impossible to reconnect the VPN to ASA on the internet

  Hello

  I ASA5540 running IOS 8.04 - K8, users are able to the VPN connection over the internet but impossible to reconnect the VPN when users disconnected abnormally (abnormally means they are not manually disconnect, VPN disconnect everything manually without problem occur). ASA showing an active session of the disconnected user and the user having reason 433 at the re-login VPN.

  Any suggestion and recommendation for this case.

  Awaiting your repies.

  Thank you very much.

  Kind regards

  Arsalan

  Hello

  under the tunnel-group, try to reduce the keepalive interval... Can help detect that the peer is down faster...

  Best wishes

  McLaughlin

• Connection VPN concentrator 3000 problem

  Hi all

  I hope that u all experts will be able to help me through this time thick. Our VPN 3000 Concentrator admin password has been changed by someone in order to reset the password using directly by serial cable, now the problem is it allows me to connect with admin console but not via the web administration or telnet interface. I have activated access telnet and http, but always without success. Concentrator uses the internal database so no AAA server is configured.

  Can someone help me please thanks to this?

  Kind regards

  The console password should be the same as the telnet and HTTP password.

  The problem doesn't seem to be on the password.

  Please check under: Administration--> access--> access control list--> and check if your IP is in the list. If this isn't the case, please add your IP address/subnet to the list for you HTTP access to the VPN concentrator.

• Recovery of password on the vpn concentrator 3000 4.0 running above

  Hi all

  I looked in the collection of information about a vpn concentrator 3000 for one our clients who have recently begun to support. We have no documentation on the user name or password for the hub:

  The link on cisco http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_password_recovery09186a008009434f.shtml
  tells you how to reset the administrative password. But can someone confirm after doing so, the hub will retain the old configuration, I am very reluctant to do so because we have no documentation anywhere configuration and saw that you can lose it in some of the old pix/switches/routers.

  Thank you very much.

  For what it's worth, I followed this procedure to properly reset the administrator password on a VPN 3000 Concentrator without loss of the active configuration.

• Failover with VPN concentrator

  Hi all

  We have unique VPN concentrator which is the single point of failure, so need your help to mitigate the same

  The topology diagram is attached

  Site A and Site B.

  Site B has internet gateways where we have existing VPN.

  The intention to introduce the site A & Concentrator VPN gateway VPN is set as well

  Our design is provided for in

  Connectivity between the two locations & other office is managed by BGP.

  Default route is pointing at the Internet gateway.

  Info by the Internet Segment.

  ·         We have the SP independent IP range

  ·         Switching between 2 SP to site B is obtained by using the iBGP and eBGP

  Challenge: VPN concentrator single Point of failure (the Cisco VPN concentrator 3000)

  Here are the design goals

  ·         Implement internet gateways to the Site - A which will have redundancy level of Portal Site

  ·         Place on the VPN concentrator, which will act as a switch between site

  o If the concentrator vpn site B is out of box A VPN site must support all traffic.

  Concentrator VPN active o replica of Site B

  Is it possible to achieve the objectives of design.

  Please help about the VPN concentrator... How I can set VPN concentrator in failover mode... Just as we do firewalls?

  Help, please

  Hi yogesh,

  Concentrator VPN supports failover through VRRP. Please find the following for your reference document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_tech_note09186a0080094490.shtml

  As for the addition of failover for VPN concentrator, you happen to have a spare hub VPN to run VRRP?

  Don't know if you know, however, VPN concentrator comes end of life and the last delivery date was November 2007, as a result, you will not be able to buy VPN concentrator more.

  Here's the EOL notificatin for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5749/ps2284/prod_end-of-life_notice0900aecd805cd5a0.html

• Satellite U400 not reconnect to WLAN after coming out of hibernation

  I have a Satellite U400, and I connect to my office wireless network. It works great until my laptop goes into hibernation mode.

  When I bring it from hibernation, it do not reconnect to my wireless network and I have to restart.
  Once restarted, it connect fine.

  Does anyone has an idea why this is happening and what I can do to fix this?

  Thank you

  David

  Hello David

  Usually these problems are resolved with BIOS and WLAN driver update. Have you tried to solve this problem with any of these updates?