A maximum performance and sync lgwr claim

Similar Questions

• The difference b/w maximum performance and maximum availability

  Hello
  
  What is the basic difference b/w maximum performance and maximum availability.
  If maximum performance scenarios is used and ensures db stops, changes in the primary db will apply to the next time you start backup db.
  
  Thanx

  Hello

  I have read all answer your thread.

  If you create a broker - managed DataGuard configuration, you can use
  quick start failover (FSFO) for your dataguard.
  When your primary is down, your sleep will change primary role.

  Concerning
  Mr. Mahir Quluzade

• Question about the MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode

  An excerpt of the ML note: 239100.1
  
  

  To participate in maximum performance the following requirements must be met:
  
      Redo Archival Process : LGWR or ARCH
      Network Transmission mode : ASYNC when using LGWR only 
      Disk Write Option : NOAFFIRM
      Standby Redo Logs : No, but recommended and required for Real-Time Apply   

  What is

  Standby Redo Logs : No

  What means? Cannot create a database without Online redo logs. Right?

  Standby Redo Logs are not the same as online newspapers. They are used only in the role of Eve (by RFS background process) to allow primary LGWR.
  You always want to create them regardless of the level of protection. They are (in theory) an option with Max Performance.

  Kind regards
  Uwe Hesse

  http://uhesse.WordPress.com

• Satellite 145 turns off when running with a maximum performance (3.4 Ghz)

  Hi people

  Satellite 145 P4 538 / XP HE / 512 MB / 60 GB / 17WXGA / DVD-SupermultiDL /.

  I have a question that stirs in me a right pain in the ass, everytime I run my laptop at full speed (3.4 Ghz) for more than 5 minutes and the laptop is on a flat surface with good air circulation but works hard for example video editing or Gamming the stupid thing is just too hot and goes out... But when the laptop works to mask (1.8 GHz) its fine and dandy just without the factor additional ka-boom...

  ideas for the most part welcomed

  Thank you

  Mike
  E-mail: [email protected]

  Hello

  It seems like your laptop is overheating. You should check the cooling module if possible works with maximum performance. In addition, you can try to clean the fans with the vacuum cleaner. Especially fans can not work properly because of the dust inside the laptop.

  In addition, you can also check the settings for standby power. The cooling module must be set to max.

• How to play games with maximum performance?

  Hello
  There is a problem with my laptop (HP Pavilion dm4-1265dx Entertainment PC) performance, the gmes are really slow, my brother has a HP Pavillion dv6 and it supports all types of games, I may know the answer, when it plug the charger the whole screen goes black and then return in 1 second and then he can play games.

  The dm4 is better than the dv6, but I think the dv6 supports ATI Readon Mobility when plug it in the charger, but I can not activate my Readon SMA so I guess how to use performance professionalism when I plug the charger.

  I've tried so far things:

  The advanced 1) Changed power settings and selecting maximum performance when I plug in the charger.
  (2) Changed the graph options, Intel Graphics Media Panel and the maximum performance when connected to the charger.

  Please answer, thanks :)

  Looks like its included video card is much more powerful than the included Intel graphic card using your laptop. Who can make a huge difference in the game.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Maximum CPU and RAM to the Virtual Image

  Hi all

  I have the host whose hardware 2 cpu machine each with 4 core that is all of the 8 and 16 GB of Ram. On this server image Linux single runs, which has mysql in there. currently image use 4 core processor and 4 GB of RAM.

  As I'm observing some performance issue, I want to increase cpu and memory allocated to the virtual machine.

  Can someone will let me know maximum CPU and RAM I can attribute to the image without destabilizing or errors.

  I'm under VMware ESXi 5.5.0

  Hi again mithrandirr,

  you don't have to worry about the allocation of CPU. The ESXi VMkernel is very flexible in terms of handling & plan the resources of the processor. You'd be fine same allocation the CPU power you have (so 2 Sockets x 4 cores per Socket) to the server. The CPU cycles are carried out on request if you don't have to worry about making your physical host fails or otherwise degraded performance. Therefore, you can go ahead and increase the number of base to 6 in what either I described above. Just for your information, the internal processes of the ESXi (referred to as 'worlds') always run on CPU logic 0 and consume very little resources.

• Big client - vCenter 5.5 response time of the customer Web U1c / questions of Performance and Navigation

  So we're all aware of the issues with vCenter 5.5U1 WebClient and how we are forced to use it to make use of all the features of the v10, vDS 5.5 vHardware (config switch changes the synchronization problems if an emergency change is done on c# client vDS) VSAN only available via the web client, flash, sluggish to questions do not respond the questions and the list goes with the presentation of the menus and hard to navigate, issues SSO (always after 5.5 upgrades)

  So @ VMware vCenter Architecture Team is going to make an effort to hear and give due to the much needed performance improvements and improvements to the user interface before adding more features and SSO type services which majority of clients don't use not and not force it's customers continue to loose faith its vCenter product?

  Looking for answers with options to remove vCenter 5.5 U1c installation as well as a promise to answer to these in vCenter 6.0 version!

  Here is your answer. First of all, to use Chrome as your browser, then you need to go with at least 4vCPU * 32 GB of RAM & adjust the segment size of java for SSO, Tomcat, (TC) Management Server, inventory server and profile based storage to "refine" vCenter device with DB Oracle embedded or external memory. I did, and performance gains went 10 X. This includes the vSAN enabled running clusters. My recommendation that works very well based on design documents:

  vCenter Server inventory	VMware VirtualCenter Management Webservices (tc Server)	The inventory service	(Sps) profile-based storage service
  Large (more than 400 guests or 4000 VMS) stock	4 GB	12 GB	4 GB

  Setting on the vCenter server 5.5 of the memory unit

  • Connect the unit to vCenter server using SSH
  • VI /usr/lib/vmware-vsphere-client/server/wrapper/conf/wrapper.conf configuration file, locate the JVM memory section and change maxmemory to 4096

  Line 66

  # Memory #wrapper.java.initmemory = 512wrapper.java.maxmemory = 4096 JVM

  • /usr/lib/vmware-vpx/inventoryservice/wrapper/conf/wrapper.conf VI configuration file, find the setting. MaxMemory and replace it with 12288

  Line 116

  # Size (in MB) maximum Java heap wrapper.java.maxmemory = 12288

  • VI /usr/lib/vmware-vpx/sps/wrapper/conf/wrapper.conf find the setting. MaxMemory and change from 1024 to 4096

  On line 154

  # Size (in MB) maximum Java heap wrapper.java.maxmemory = 4096

  • Restart the vCenter device w / DB (1000 hosts) external /embedded for lab (100 guests)

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=2005086&sliceId=1&docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&dialogID=294472825&StateID=1%200%20294492358

  Documentation Centre of vSphere 5.5

  PS: vCenter 6.0 has much better performance based on my beta test... so don't lose hope yet. Many improvements to come...

  PS: I've also broken down on this here until I figured this out just recently: Re: big client - vCenter 5.5 response time of the customer Web U1c / questions of Performance and Navigation

• maximum performance for storage

  Hello Experts,
  
  I am in the phase of implementation of a new box of EMC for the database (oracle10g) of production. We are going to implement of the ASM.what is the best arrangement of the discs to be implemented to obtain maximum performance, the administartion and redundancy of the Oracle view?
  
  
  Thank you

  If we implement hardware lavel, sayRAID10 storage level itself then what level of redundancy should be used in ASM?

  It depends on. You must select external redundancy only if your storage space is available. With external redundancy, your storage space is (potentially) a single point of failure.
  If you want to mirror your data between two storage (so you can fail with no impact on your database), you must select NORMAL redundancy.

  --
  Ronny Egner
  My Blog: http://blog.ronnyegner-consulting.de

• Documents and Sync that keeps depleting my data

  Nice day

  I have an I Phone 4s, to the title of System Services is a menu called Documents and Sync that keeps depleting my data, is it possible that turns off?

  You can stop using iCloud for your applications or even remove iCloud account at all if you can't use it in your data plan.

  Also try settings > iCloud > iCloud Drive > disable Mobile Data use

• My application Snapchat says "pending". I already saved, restarted and synced my phone and nothing works. When I try to delete the app it still doesn't let me.

  Snapchat is usually a good app on my iPhone work 6. Yesterday, my application is gray and says "pending". I thought it was an update, so I don't worry. Come to find out that when I rebooted, backed up and synced my phone, it does not always work. In addition, if I tried to remove the app it will not work.

  Hi there larry.mcgill,

  Thanks for stopping by the communities Support from Apple! Looks like the Snapchat app on your iPhone 6 is grayed out, despite trying to restart, backup, synchronize your device and delete the app. I'll be more than happy to offer some suggestions to solve this problem.

  To start, go to settings > general > storage & use of iCloud. From there, press "Manage storage" under "Storage". You should see a list of your applications to fill out after a while. Scroll down and locate the app Snapchat tap on it and see if it will allow you to remove it from there! If so, you can go back into the App Store and reinstall.

  If you are unable to remove the application in this way, you can try to reset the settings on your iPhone. To do this, go to settings > general > reset > reset all settings. This removes any of your personal data. You may need to adjust some of your user-specific settings (for example, wallpaper, etc.), as well as re - enter your Wi - Fi connection information.

  In addition, you want to watch resetting your device to factory settings to rule out any software issues. It could install a new copy of iOS on your iPhone. Once you test that you are able to access Snapchat, you can restore from a backup. Here's a link with information on how to restore the factory settings:

  Use iTunes on your Mac or PC to restore your iPhone, iPad or iPod to factory settings

  Relax your day wonderful!

• "Erase and sync" removes my app data?

  I've seen tons of posts on this topic already, but they are all rather outdated and never seem to apply exactly to my situation. I have an iPod Touch 4th generation which I want to synchronize with a new PC. I've used homeshare to get all my music and other multimedia content from my old PC. When I press the sync button in iTunes, I get the notorious "this iPod is synced with another iTunes library. Message you want to erase this iPod and sync with this iTunes library? ». I have a few apps on my iPod with content that I would not like to lose, like the best scores in games, books, and videos uploaded within third-party applications. My question is, I'll lose data when I sync or it erases just my music, videos and other stuff in the Apple of specific applications? Thanks :).

  Also, I use the latest version of iTunes and I am on iOS 6 on my iPod Touch.

  With all applications and other media in your iTunes library, backup iPod to iTunes and restore the backup.

  To restore backup see:

  Restore your device from an iCloud or iTunes backup - Apple Support

  If you restore from a backup of iCloud apps will be automatically downloaded. If you restore from backup iTunes, applications and music must be in iTunes since synchronized as music media library and apps are not included in the backup of the iOS device what iTunes does.

• What is the best software to improve performance and free hard disk cleanup. I used MacKeeper, but I'm tired of paying annual fees for this service.

  What is the best software to improve performance and free hard drive cleanup? I used MacKeeper, but I'm tired of paying annual fees for this service.

  You shouldn't have these software.  See discussion of Klaus1

  Do not install MacKeeper

  See also this one by Klaus1

  Viruses, Trojans, Malware - and other aspects of Internet Security

• Daily series VS Performance and entertainment?

  HP has desktop computers in the "Everyday Computing" and "Performance and Enterment" series.

  I adapted a desktop computer in both series.  For the series of performance and Entertainment Office, you get more choice of components.

  However, the components that I need are available for both series.

  In addition, desktop computers has the same motherboard.

  If desktop computers have been adapted with the same components, wouldn't they have the same performance?

  I understand what you ask because I did the same thing and had the same questions.  The answer is Yes.

  But there are other differences between the two lines, in addition to the customizable options of cpu, ram, disk hard size and chip/card graphic.  Click the tab of the sheet and you'll see different chassis sizes, sizes of power, a different number of slots, etc.

  The series 'Performance and play' has a more robust architecture and is easier to add updates in the future, as the media platforms continue to evolve.  Also gives you a little more space inside to work with.

  I hope this helps.

• iTunes asks me to erase and sync with the computer, I have always used

  I have Apple's music service and I did a new playlist on my computer in iTunes. I went to manually transfer the playlist and the option was no longer available, and he said that iCloud music library was on and it does not give me the option to manually add music. I turned iCloud music library off on my iPhone and the option to add manually the music once again appeared in iTunes. When I clicked "Sync Music", he acted as if I've never used this computer to add music and said it would erase all the data and sync with this library. Did register for Apple music destroy my ability to still add music manually from iTunes? It is quite frustrating. Please can someone explain if there is a way to listen to my new playlist without erasing and reloading of music again?

  I use a Macbook Pro. All the software on the phone and the computer is up-to-date.

  If both your device and your library are implemented for Apple music then you don't synchronize with iTunes. Content or playlists added to the library appears on the device and can be listened to or downloaded by Wi - Fi.

  TT2