A NAS 4 TB of indexing drive.

Dear Sir, dear Madam, a SIN 4 TB of indexing drive.

Our firm supports all 5 computers attached to a NAS drive 4 TB with approximately 1.5 TB of data to document on the NAS system. All our computers are running Widows 7 Professional and are 64-bit operating systems.

We are one of the 100 most systems administered by a Government Department. The it Department is unable to find a way for each of our computers in our office network to index the NAS drive.

It is not order via a right click on the NAS drive or a folder on the NAS drive and select 'always available offline '. We also tried a number of other workaround solutions which none provide access.

Help, please

Robin Chapple

This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

Tags: Windows

Similar Questions

  • Iomega StorCenter ix2-200 how automatically save everything on the NAS to my external HARD drive?

    Hey, I have a WD 3 TB my book around the pose I want to connect to my IX2-200 and use the external hard drive to automatically back up everything that's stored on my NAS.

    How can I do this?

    Thank you.

    Not sure wheter ix2 is able to work with > 2 TB is spread over its USB ports, but normally you would create a copy job that contains "all directories".

    If your ix2 doesn't detect your USB, try to repartition your drive USB-2 to + 1 TB

  • Windows OS: Part indexing drives

    I'm working on a project in order to to make it easier and more time efficient to find files on a drive to share. Now I have Windows 7, so I don't know how the other Windows OS would work with it. I fell on indexing, which I learned is a type of search by using the search bar 'start' mechanism and the most common result or the newest files when you search for a keyword. Correct me if that's wrong, some info I found on the internet. Places can be added or removed from the index? I heard that if a part of the road is indexed, then the hard drive is filled quickly enough. Can someone explain why this happens? Why the hard drive fills if the share drive is an external source? Indexing of the drive leaves make a copy of the share drive and all files, or make reference to it? Thank you!

    It does not have a copy.  He puts an index.

    Depending on your configuration it usually "does not upward" the hard drive and the index is stored on the operating system drive.

  • R7000 drive NAS cannot delete the folders permissions question user-person not

    I have the R7000 with a Seagate STBV4000100 4 to USB 3.0 drive connected. I can connect to it very well, driving shares of work etc. Since a WIN 7 64 bit OS file system using windows Explorer I can create folders, etc.

    It comes occasionally when I try to delete some files or folders, I get the following message;

    "You must be authorized to perform this action."
    You need authorization of Unix User\nobody to make changes to this file"

    It would seem that I am not able to change the permissions of either windows Explorer.

    If anyone knows how I can change the permissions so I can delete from windows Explorer?

    One thing of note. When I copied the files/folders on the NAS of the windows system drive, some files have been marked read-only. Not sure if this is part of the question, but anyway. How do I set the permissions to something so I can remove them from windows?

    NOTE: If I disconnect the drive of the router and connect directly to the computer... it works fine. As the router and the PC are not on the same floor, is not practical and defeated the purpose. Suggestions welcome!

    After a few reformats the drive, it worked for me. The eSata disk files are exactly like Windows Explorer 'standard '. I can save, load, delete, change properties, etc... Because it worked, I had to turn off the router once, and after a reboot, nothing had changed. While working. (except the bad 5G wifi and "freaky" interface, but it was like before)...

  • Question of swap hard drive NAS Datastore

    I make a hard drive on my QNAP NAS hotswap... as long as it's RAID 1. I have RAID 6, so I have to stop my NAS to swap a hard drive.

    Stupid question: can I stop my NAS without closing all my virtual machines? I can make sure there is no change to the VMs. Sorry, I'm looking for an easy solution < g >. I don't have a storage vMotion-enabled.

    One of my hard drives in the NAS is to launch during the self-test read errors.

    Thank you

    Mark

    Without stopping the virtual machine, you will need to move to a different external storage device.  If you have any other storage to move the virtual machine then your only option is to stop.

  • What is the best solution when my external drive for Time Machine is full?

    Hello

    I use the latest version of Mac OS X on my iMac 27 ". I use a drive outside of 3 TB G-Tech for Time Machine backup. Due to my recently many RAW photo images, I have less 8% left storage on my external hard drive, so I'm trying to figure out next steps in what concerns the strategy of external storage and have the following questions:

    • When my external drive for Time Machine is full, it is my understanding that older backups on external hard drive will be deleted to make room for newer backups. If the oldest backups contained pictures (whose records have not changed since the time they are initially stored), then I guess that these photos will be removed from the external drive - correct?
    • If I had to replace my external drive for Time Machine with a new external drive which is as big or bigger than the one it replaces, what should I expect on the size of the initial backup on the new drive? I guess the size of the backup would be exactly equal to the current amount of storage used on my drive hard iMac - correct?
    • Would it not be possible to connect the external drive for Time Machine existing at a new Time Machine external drive so that when the original disk is full, the overflow will be automatically stored on the new external hard drive for Time Machine? (If feasible, it seems that this strategy would maximize my external storage capacity vs just replace external drives.)

    I realize that my first two questions are rather basic, but I don't want to make any false assumptions. The third idea is intriguing and I would like to know if this is a viable option.

    Thank you

    Brian

    older files are starting to get deleted because the disk fills up then Yes, they went

    the backup drive should ideally be 4 times the capacity of your current drive, twice is good but has its limits. Also factor in what you store: a jpeg from the web and a raw photo file are the two images, the size of a is very different. If you work in high-resolution or large native files, or audio files (record pro, no music files) or video production twice the disk fills up very quickly. If you collect photos and JPEG and mp3 files or a handful of videos not so much is necessary.

    I would keep the old drive intact if you want to replace and start over with a new drive, if that's the plan. You have the old data, you can keep it somewhere safe and have a redundant backup which you can reconnect at any time to restore from. Let the new index drive itself with new data and take if from there, in the case otherwise you can copy the backup to the new drive and set the drive as the new source of backup but personally I wouldn't copy of the data, that's my preference, it may not be yours and that's fine.

  • RN102 3 on 4 hard drives failed in 2 years

    Hi all

    New for communities, but I got the RN102 (purchased from NETGEAR on Amazon with 2 Seagate (ST3000DM001) of 3 TB drives)

    Since all mid 2013. Long story short, I had not set up correctly on the NAS notification alerts, and on mid 2014 did not have two disks. After much back and forth with NETGEAR Tech Support, they sent me two new drives (also ST3000DM001), and I had to send the failed disks to Seagate Recovery Services (they recovered data for a tidy sum!).

    Flash forward to the mid-2015, and one of the replacement burners has failed. I'm pretty bummed.

    My questions - are these disks Seagate just rubbish? Is this normal behavior for them? Can I get something like a red WD drive instead? Or, is there something wrong with my NAS he keeps murdering hard drives? I bought this because I thought it would be a relatively stable place to store files, but it was the storage device hard disk less stable that I have ever owned!

    I would appreciate any ideas or recommendations!

    Don

    Hi dbreda,

    No worries. You will get a replacement soon.

    Kind regards

    BrianL
    NETGEAR community

  • Centrifuge the USB drive

    Hello!

    Can the firmware disable external USB drives when idle?

    Ideally I see him rinse all the pads, turn the drive down, but don't not dismantling.

    I have EAP6300, try to use as NAS filesystem with an external drive (IOmega),: HFS + (Mac) if it's important.

    Thank you!

    Probably not because it works as expected.

  • Why does movement of files on a USB flash drive last so long?

    I don't know if this is a Windows problem, but when I move a lot of files/folders (no copy, but select, then drag, or cut and paste) a place on the USB to another place on the flash drive, it takes much longer than the same hard disk.

    What is a Windows problem or a problem of flash player?

    If Windows is somehow move the files into pieces on the hard drive, then moving them back to the flash drive, I could see that as being the reason, but this seems very inefficient. If Windows says just the flash drive to move files and it does itself, I wonder if it is an inefficiency in the flash drive (or formatting) or just the nature of how flash drives move some files.

    I don't know that you have understood my problem. I moved the files to the flash drive from one folder to another on the flash drive. When I move tons of files in a folder on the Windows Installer by car, no matter where the records are or the number of files/folders are moved, it usually happens instantly and occasionally perhaps takes a fraction of a second or two; I know it's simply by changing the index (do not physically move the files). With a USB flash drive, it takes seconds to minutes, depending on how much is moved, which is usually much less to install on the windows drive. It's because flash player must physically move the files on the disk, there is no index to put it as on a fixed drive.  In addition the only way to move is to copy in memory, and then write it to the new location.  This means that each overflow bit must go through the USB connection (which is thousands of times slower than SATA cable on the real hard disk), and since then he has to go twice (in and out), it is even half as slow as new.

    There is no transfer between the hard drive and the flash player I know.

    What this means for me, it is the index or take more time to rewrite, or files are actually moved. What I'm asking is if Windows is somehow data transfer (even if it's the index) drive flash disk, then moving them backwards, slowing things down. I think that even moving them by RAM would slow it down, but I'm not sure.  Also considers that the internal drive is cached. So even if a bit should be moved, Windows will just notice "Yes move this bit later."  The progress box says it completed instantly, but really uses lazy writeback just finish the job later.  That is why if you lose power to your computer, it corrupts the files got reported as fact, but were not actually written on the disc.  Flash drives do not use the lazy "write behind caching" because they never know when the user will disconnect unexpectedly, so that they take the slow lane and check writing all ended before they say the progress bar to advanced. 

    You can change this second element by setting your USB device to "best performance" in the device, as Manager below.  But I do not recommend because it cannot handle unplug you the reader more.

  • requirments for nas Win7 backup

    I wonder if you can backup win7 Home premium to nas or a mapped network drive. or do you need win7 pro?

    Hi James,

    Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community and we give the opportunity to help you.

    It seems that you wanted to backup Windows 7 Home Premium to NAS (Network-Attached Storage) or to a mapped network drive.

    Yes, you can backup data to Network-Attached Storage files or mapped network drive.

    Here are some articles that provide more information about the backup of data or files in Windows:

    Back up your files

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/back-up-your-files

     

    Back up and restore: frequently asked questions

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/back-up-and-restore-frequently-asked-questions

     

    Backup and restore

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/backup-and-restore

    Hope this information helps. For any other corresponding Windows help, do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to help you.

  • Publish on the hard drive is no longer writes XMP files?

    To save my raw files and metadata XMP to my NAS, I have a hard drive configuration Service post and pointed toward the mounted directory. He was works perfectly (writing of CR2 files with XMP), but from the most recent update (v3.4.1), it seems that LR3 is no longer writes XMP sidecar files when I publish on the hard disk through this service. I haven't changed anything on the service configuration, and I can't find any useful options in the service settings.

    This change for someone else? Why would he suddenly no longer export the XMP files with my raw CR2 files? Other than me having to manually copy the files from my cataloge, nobody knows how to fix this so I can get my simple drag & drop publication backup back?

    Thanks for any help,

    Mike

    Mike,

    Sorry, I guess I copied the wrong link in my answer for filing a bug report. It should have been this one.

    In the meantime, I've created this bug report for this issue.

    Beat

  • Change of external drives for the LR catalog

    I keep my lightroom catalog file on my computer, but I store my images on an external drive.

    I recently bought a new external NAS RAID 1 drive to replace my NAS RAID 1 older, smaller drive and all my images are passed to this new disc.


    I've been looking through the forums and googling and just groping in LR, but can't figure out how to make my catalog aware of the fact that the images are on the new drive.

    Two things: I'm on a Mac and my external drives are drives NAS (there is no involved and unmapped Windows drive letter).

    The structure is the same thing, I just need to educate the new disc instead of the old disk catalog.

    My Setup was

    /Volumes/old -player/photos /.

    2003 /.

    2004.

    2005 /.

    ... etc...

    My new Setup is

    /Volumes/-newdisc/photos /.

    2003 /.

    2004.

    2005 /.

    ... etc...

    My catalog is in

    /Users/ < I >/pictures/Lightroom catalogs/Network Storage.lrcat

    Is there a way to change the Storact.lrcat network so that it looks for images on 'new disc' instead of 'old-player "?

    The function you are looking for is right-click (cmd-click? don't know) on the high-level folder in LR and reconnect it to the new location of the disk.  It will allow you to navigate to the new folder location.

    If you make the top, it will reconnect them just below the...

    See you soon!

  • Spotlight privacy and strength of transmission usb eject

    I use an external usb drive, as my Time Machine drive. almost every time that I try to eject it, I get a message that it cannot be ejected and I should use the ejection Force. In the past, I was able to avoid this by turning off Spotlight indexing drive. However, when I try to add this drive (or other) for the Spotlight privacy settings, I get an error message and I cannot add anything. What happens in the privacy of Spotlight? Why can't I eject this drive? I use two other USB external drives on a regular basis and do not have this problem with either. Is - this specific Time machine?

    You have some sort of problem with the drive. I would try using first aid in disk utility to solve this problem, if it is repairable.

    Repair the hard drive and permissions - El Capitan

    HD recovery start:

    Restart the computer and after the buzzer, press on and hold down the COMMAND and R until the menu screen appears.

    Repair

    When the recovery menu appears, select disk utility and press the continue button. Disk utility charges and select the withdrawal of external volume of the Scripture list on the left.  Click the first aid tab in the toolbar... If disk utility reports any errors that have been corrected, then re-run first aid until no errors are reported. Wait until the operation is complete, then quit disk utility and return to the main menu. Select restart from the Apple menu.

  • NAS200 JBOD/LVM scandisk fails

    Hello

    as I set up my new NAS200, using disks 2x1To as a disc in JBOD mode, scandisk fails every time. Newspaper accessible via the administrative Web interface, a scandisk boot process leads to the entrance of the newspaper " LVM: ' (i.e. no results are saved!)" or "": scandisk failed '. " I use the latest firmware version 3.4R79.

    To try to solve this problem, I tried the following two:

    * I changed the firmware JAC4, connected via SSH and descended from xfs_repair, with the result of the SIN all suspended after xfs_repair for maybe 15 minutes running, but before he finished (after agno2).

    * I have detached the two discs of the NAS, attached to a PC, started using Knoppix 6.2 and made xfs_repair on the logical volume with no problems (in 40 seconds). I have attached the two drives on the NAS again, but still no scandisk initiated through the administration Web interface!

    What - what, there is a problem with the firmware?

    Are there other balls to distinguish who said to me why scandisk fails?

    Will I go back to JAC4 and run scandisk via SSH using different commands?

    I would like to regain my confidence to the NAS200...

    Welcome,

    Martin

    mbern wrote:

    However, when I try to test on the NAS via SSH and xfs_repair, the process fails. So far, I thought that the process crashes, but now when I try again, it seems that, indeed, the xfs_process is killed by the operating system:

    The program can be killed by oom_killer the kernel if it allocates too much memory too quickly. If you had a serial port on the console, you would be able to see. Another way to see if this happens is to start /etc/rc.syslog (she normally doesn't start) and enter the command "tail-f var &" so that syslog messages are dumped to your ssh session where they occur. Don't forget to disable syslog again by entering "killall syslogd, klogd" and remove var because they eat RAM too!

    The time-out that I referred to has a possible timeout the web GUI can be used when it is waiting for the xfs_repair program. Of course, if you start the command line xfs_repair this applies to you.

    mbern wrote: too bad that they tested it with 750Go only, I wan't able to find a good official statement (on the Web page, in the manual). But I remember my dealer claimed the support of 1 TB, otherwise I would not have bought the NAS with two 1 TB drives. I also used the NAS in Raid 1 with drives of 1 TB without worries as above.

    The manual and the site doesn't mention that they have tested with 750 GB drives, they just mention (mentioned?) that drives up to 750 GB are supported. I guess they have tested with larger disks as possible...

    I use a drive 1 TB and never had no problem, theoretically there could be a problem if you install a disk that is longer than 2 TB (tera-byte binary) because this corresponds to the maximum value that can be managed by access 48-bit LBA. Most likely, the readers with a capacity of 2.5 (decimal) to claim are the first readers who won't be able to use 2 (binary) TB because of this problem. I have not seen all reports of anyone using the latter on a NAS200 yet.

    = Jac

  • Why Windows backup will not work on a network share?

    I am running Vista Home Premium and have a drive WD MyBookWorld NAS on a MS LAN.  OneCare used to do all my backups, never had any problem, but OneCare is no more.  I also have a NAS Iomega 2 TB hard drive and the problem is exactly the same for that too - XP and 7 can save on it, Vista can not.

    Windows backup works very well for readers SIN of my XP and 7 machines, but both the Vista, those who refuse.  I can drag and drop files from Vista to NAS, it's just the backup center who is the problem.  When I select the NAS drive for the backup on, he asks a user name and password.  My login to the Vista machine id does not work, and the administrator to the NAS password does not work.  The procedure fails with the 0x800706C6 message.  He refuses also backup on XP or 7 machines (with different messages).  He would be the backup on my other machine to Vista, but I do not have spare storage!
    I have read articles countless and tried to turn on/off control of accounts and mapping changes the network drive, without success - the error message, but does not go far.
    There is an industry on the internet trying to sell people PCHA (what is described as a Microsoft product), but I can't find any help on the Microsoft web site.  It is very bad, when the fault is so common.
    Help, please.  What should I do?

    Hello

    Windows Home Premium backup can't backup on a network location.
    So you will need to use an application of part 3. Professional, comprehensive and Enterprise edition
    backup to a network share.

    You can share files and use the 3rd backup XP to do or use Acronis or other
    party utilities.

    I prefer for the most of backup data and prefer to do it in a way that makes it easy to find
    and to restore a file as well as many.

    Replicator - free - excellent backup tool for backing up the data
    http://www.KarenWare.com/PowerTools/ptreplicator.asp

    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for