A small animation for export of a high-resolution movie - problem.

Similar Questions

• Cursor becomes very small on W550S with a display high resolution (2880 x 1620)

  I have a W550S with a disply 2880 x 1620 running Windows 10. Once logged in, after a few minutes, the mouse pointer becomes very small, about 1/2 the size of the regular cursor. I use 200% scaling (recommended for high resolution viewing). I can restore the normal size pointer by selecting under the mouse settings, but finally it switches back on about 1/2 size.

  It seems that Windows 'forget' that she runs at 200% scale and turns again to the normal scale of 100% of IPR.

  Does anyone else have this problem? It is a problem because when she becomes so tiny I can't often found on the screen.

  Oh and I sometimes run with an external monitor-normal DPI connected to the laptop. I think the problem started when I plugged the external monitor, but it happens even if I do not have the external monitor connected.

  Thanks in advance,

  -Steven

  All the...

  Please see the recent Synaptics update package:

  http://support.Lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/ThinkPad-W-series-laptops/ThinkPad-W55...

  Version 19.0.17.27

  • (Fix) Removal of the option of size of button for touchpad.
  
  
  • (Fix) Fixed a problem where the cursor of the mouse become small after used average trackpoing scrolling.
  
  
  • (Fix) Fixed a user interface text size is not properly aligned.

  Kind regards.

• Replace the screen for one with a higher resolution on Satellite P850-12Z

  Hi all

  I read a lot on the internet about the replacement of the screen on computers laptop toshiba and also I saw a video on [how to replace the screen for a Toshiba Satellite P855 | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ncz3ZaI2I-s].

  Is it possible to replace the screen for a Toshiba Satellite P850 12Z (original: 15.6"@1366x768) to another screen with a higher resolution (say: 15.6"@1920x1080 or 15.6"@1600x900)?

  I'm sure that the graphics card is able to function perfectly with this screen (nVidia GeForce GT630M 2048 MB dedicated) and also I read a lot on laptop screen replacement, and I know that this screen has a connector 40 pin and it is an LED Panel, so I won't have to worry about the ups.

  I found several screens (15.6"@1920x1080) who say they are compatible with Toshiba, but I wan't to make sure a higher resolution Panel replacement is possible.

  Thank you in advance.

  Hello

  Exchange of the display is not supported by Toshiba, so I don't think that someone here can help you with this.
  I assume that Toshiba offers multiple views for this model of laptop. Only seller is different but resolution 1366 x 768 is always the same as on the original laptop specification.

  You can try to contact the nearest Toshiba service provider and ask for help. If someone can help you with that service of Toshiba. They have access to the database of Toshiba and can possibly tell if another view is usable on your machine.

  All this is quite complicated.

• How to export to PDF with crop marks * and * an image high resolution?

  HI - firstly, apologies - I have another query here and this is a related issue. Because I have been unable to solve this problem, which is with InDesign CS5, I downloaded the demo of InDesign CC, as I work at a date limit.

  OK, so I'm used to be able to export PDF files of high quality with crop marks in CS5. That's what I want to do with my file.

  In InDesign CC, it seems that if I simply 'export', I don't give me no option to add placemarks of crop, even if the file is configured to have a bleed.

  If I rather 'print' in Adobe PDF format, I * can * add crop marks. However, I then lose the option to export images in high resolution (300 dpi), and they come out pixelated.

  Maybe I'm missing something, but for now it seems to me that I have a choice of images of high quality but without crop marks or crop marks and bad quality images!

  Any help is appreciated!

  Thank you!

  PDF presets are the same in InDesign CC, they are in InDesign CS5.

  Choose file > export > Adobe PDF (Print)

  Simply choose a preset PDF which defines the resolution of the image in order to treat his high enough for your printing. There is also an option to print the Page guides and funds lost.

• Need help for export to 1080 p 60 fps into 14 components (the video is silent)

  I just bought 14 items two days before, so I'm incredibly at this news. In which case it is important, I run 64 bit Windows 10.

  So, I create a 3D animation in MMD (MikuMikuDance), a program of 3D animation to be animated music videos.

  Following another problem with MMD, if I want to make the animation to superior qualities, I need to make it into pieces - if it's 1080 p 60 fps, then the pieces is executives from 1999. Once it restores a 2000th image without taking a break, the program crashes. For the same reasons, I can't use the audio in the original clip, so I need to add it separately.

  So, I use editing programs to combine these pieces and audio into a single file, I can then save on my hard drive and download on various websites. That's what my edit looks like so:

  

  When I tried to export the file to MP4, I discovered that there is no integrated adjustment for export to 1080 p 60 fps; I could do 720 p 60 fps or 1080 p 30 fps, but 1080 p 60 fps was not an option. I decided to customize a setting for 1080 p 60 fps, but when I watched the videos, it was 1080 p 60 fps, but it is also completely silent, with no sound whatsoever. At first, I wondered if it was just a fluke and it made again. He was still silent. I restarted my computer, and left the computer alone while it has made, but he was still silent.

  A test, I used the setting for 1080 p 30 fps, and while it was not the quality I wanted, the audio worked well in this one. So, the problem - I guess - is with my fps setting custom 1080 p 60. If it works on an integrated framework, but not a customize one, then this is the only conclusion I can come to.

  Here is a series of screenshots showing my custom setting:

  

  Because you can't see it all, the name of the preset is "MP4 - H264 1920 x 1080 p 60 fps 15Mbps Medium ' (I just changed pre-set at 60 fps 1080 p and reflects by changing the 30 in the title to 60; "I do not understand most of the title); and in case it is too small to see, the custom settings are:

  Resolution: 1920 x 1080

  Format: H.264

  Frame rate: 60

  Audio: MPEG, 160 kbps, 48 kHz, stereo

  Lasted: 3 minutes, 34.34 seconds

  Flow: 15 MB/s

  Now, here's the complete list of parameters for the screening:

  

  

  

  

  So, which-if whatever this is-am I hurt? Should I change the bitrate or something?

  Try to set your audio Dolby Digital instead.

  But a lot depends on a lot.

  I don't have "everything about the specs of the MMD video that you use in your project, but which could also be a factor in this problem."

  And so couldn't your video settings, personalized 1920x1080p60 MP4, which can not be in the capacity of the program.

  And no matter what video player you play your MP4 on. Unless you use a good versatile player like VLC Media Player, you don't hear no audio from your video could be due more to the media player as the audio file itself.

• Resolution? Small screen for the Ant people. PLEs help.

  Hello people out there in the internet

  I am new to the whole experience of Muse, but I learned quickly and felt pretty confident with myself.

  For the life of me I can't understand why my entire screen ever good sites.
  I do the resolution 960px as tutorials suggest.
  The site itself is still perfect in my Muse directives and when I export and download, it turns into a Web site for people of the Ant.

  Y at - there anyone out there who might be able to help me.
  I hope it's a stupid mistake that I'm on.

  Thanks in advance

  I have attached a screenshot for reference

  

  Hi Sarah,.

  It is difficult to know without more information - if you can publish the site somewhere (temporarily, for example) that make it easier or source files or additional information.

  Many possibilities but have you checked:

  -browser scaling (easy to have 50% by accident)

  -your screen resolution - if you have a 1080 p (1920 pixels wide) or a higher resolution screen, your site can be perfectly display (1366 x 768 screen resolution is still widespread, and the site would fill most of the screen on such a device). You can check how your site as by right-clicking in chrome would look-> inspect-> click the icon at the top right-> enter your desired resolution (more frequent google) phone/tablet. The tutorial will be recommended width 960px page you should be designing your site to be viewable on your screen smaller resolution, that a visitor to your site is likely to have. Opening such a site on very high resolution such as 4 k screens results screens in a slim column with more screen space taken as empty margins. The answer to that is to design sensitive sites - sites which updates change if they look good on low, medium and high res screens. Muse was only sensitive in early 2016, so if the tutorial is before this date, it will not be admissible (issue with catering to the two high and low res screens without workarounds). I would recommend stroungly creating a site with breaking 960px and 1440px 1920px points (or whatever you decide fits your site/audience).

  -Is you making use of the HDPI of Muse option for site high resolution?

  -You run Windows 10, which has integrated scale - have you checked the settings for this?

  That said, I think you will find that your site looks tiny because your screen resolution is high - change in chrome or windows to 1366 x 768 or 1280 x 800 and see what it looks like.

  I hope this helps.

• Small animation star

  I don't know if it's a question of forum so please tell me don't ask if necessary. My character runs and collects objects. When it is successful, I would like a small animation star to start success indication - much like Mario galaxy. Someone knows how to do this or is there a ready to use swf there. In the old flash - double clip sounds a low.

  All you have to do is to create a new instance of the animation of a star.  Create the animation as a movieclip in your library.  Right-click and select link.  In the Panel that opens, select export for Actionscript and assign a class name in the textfield with this label.  Let's say that you assign a name of Star class.

  Whenever you want to create an instance of this star, you use just...

  Star: Star of var = new Star();

  addChild (star);

  and then use whatever criteria you need to place it where you want.  You can also create a function that removes the star when he ends up animation.

• Monitors high-resolution produce unreadably small fonts in software from third-party manufacturers with Windows 7 Professional.

  Operating system
  Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1
  CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT
  Intel Xeon E3 1226 v3 3.30 GHz 33 ° C
  Technology 22nm Haswell-WS
  RAM
  16.0 GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 798 MHz (11-11-11-28)
  Motherboard
  LENOVO SHARKBAY (SOCKET 0) 28 ° C
  Graphics
  LEN E2323swA (1920x1080@60Hz)
  LEN E2323swA (1920x1080@60Hz)
  2047 MB NVIDIA Quadro K620 (NVIDIA) 40 ° C
  Storage
  931GB Western Digital WDC WD10EZEX-08M2NA0 SCSI Disk Device (SATA) 34 ° C
  931GB TOSHIBA external USB 3.0 Flash DRIVE (USB (SATA)) 33 ° C
  29GB SanDisk Cruzer Glide peripheral USB (USB)
  Optical drives
  HL-DT-ST DVD-RAM GHC0N SCSI CdRom Device
  Audio
  Realtek High Definition Audio

  The default resolution and "recommended" for my two monitors lenovo is 1920 x 1080. I have a new system and I tried for a few weeks now to something to work with screen resolution and third-party apps. I am under W7 Pro right now, but will soon be getting to 10.

  The high resolution is not a problem in 7 with any Microsoft stuff. With the help of a custom of the DPI setting takes care of all the native stuff. Some third-party applications can be set as well. For example, Corel Photo Paint X 7 has bars of detachable command with command icons that can be set to small, medium or large. When the size of the icon is changed, the size of the font adjusts accordingly and it is perfectly feasible, acknowledging the icons or by reading the text. It is perfect for this dual screen system and works like a charm.

  However, most of other software companies are not quite as respectful of their clients. Bryce, formerly owned by Corel, but now DAZ despicable, is not removable toolbars and there is no options available to adjust the sizes of icons in order. Even if preferences to provide an engaging, multiple monitor option not to release the toolbars or increase the font size. It only opens the Bryce "Labs" in the second monitor in a position at the end of the dialog box, half of the Cup.

  It also applies even in a top of the range of applications such as VIEW and Smith Micro, Poser Pro. They present menus and toolbar icons that are so tiny, it is necessary to use the Magnifier Microsoft to make and which isn't real solution when your work with graphics programs. It's incredibly awkward.

  My old system, running XP Pro, SP3, which I always put in place and operational, has a screen resolution of 1280 X 768, and it displays all the software of third party very well. If I try to use this resolution with W7 and these monitors high resolution, I get a crushed image down and half on the screen which is useless. I can read everything very well, but all images are short and fat! If it was possible to type values for the height and width, using an infinite scale rather than the fixed scale that is provided by the slider over, nicked in W7, it would be possible to find a combination that worked. Then, once the wreck was set for third party stuff, the custom DPI settings Windows could take care of the native stuff.

  I had an Oracle VirtualBox running for awhile and loaded the third of things out there and it worked for awhile but it did not offer the ability double screen and, in any case, after awhile it started to get really uptight and I finally just had to get rid of.

  Really, I would be much happier if I could just load XP Pro on this machine and do run as quickly as things that made to run on it. The only reason why I got a new system was the need for more speed and muscle. But if I can't use my favorite, applications worth it?

  Is there no workaround solution that will make it possible to adjust the resolution so that the third-party applications are fully functional using all the space on the screen?

  Thank you to everyone who takes the time to read and respond.

  Since no one answered I'll provide the solution myself. Doing right thing 'upgrade' to Windows 10 has this problem of resolution.

  Other than that, getting W10 to work even at halfway was a nightmare.

• Doubt on the export of pages in JPG format at high resolution with Indesign

  Hello

  I use to work two software, your skill of QuarkXpress and Indesign. If I had to choose one, I prefer Indesign, it is very nice and I love it, but I have to work with the software.

  Well, I have a doubt about the use of Indesign method to export a page in JPG, high-resolution, because QuarkXpress do the same job, but in a different way, so my doubt is about the quality of the files produced.

  It is a very technical issue, if someone with experience in the professional press and print or an Adobe expert could answer, I would be grateful.

  InDesign, producing a poor quality file or QuarkXpress that producing a poor quality file?

  My question is as follows:

  I opened a document in Indesign, and I decide to export it. To simplify things, we have a unique page DIN A4 document.

  So I tell Indesign to export the pageand I want a JPG, high-resolution 300 DPI file.

  Indesign do his job very well, and produce the file exported. This is a JPG file, there are 300 dpi.

  If I open the document in Photoshopand I'm going to... Image of ... Image size...

  I see the Indesign document indicates the exact measurements of a DIN A4 210 x 297 mm and the resolution of the file, I have 300 DPI.

  Therefore seems to be that indesign has done a great job.

  Very well.

  Now, I explain what is happening with QuarkXpress.

  I do the same thing, I have a document to a single page, DIN A4 and I export it as JPG format at high resolution of 300 dpi.

  Well, now QuarkXpress, create the file and I open the file in Photoshop.

  Surprise.

  The file has larger than DIN A4 and a lower resolution dimensions!

  Exactly, QuarkXpress produce a jpg of the following dimensions: 874,89 x 1237,9 mm and a resolution of 72 dpi

  When I see 72 dpi, I think that the document is in low resolution. However, I have a larger document?

  I open the QuarkXpress file in Photoshop, then I uncheck resampling, in this way Photoshop will never change the image. Now, I change the value of resolution of 72 dpi, 300 dpi, which is the value I want.

  And what happens? What happens is that I get a document with measurements of a DIN A4 and also at 300 DPI.

  ???

  So basically QuarkXpress does the same work in Indesign, but in a different way.

  The file QuarkXpress are 2.29 MB more or less. The Indesign file are 3.84 MB more or less.

  So why these differences?

  Which method is the best and why Indesign produce a different file to QuarkXpresss?

  See you soon

  As far as I know, the ppi is not the required metadata for the images.

  So Im guessing that Quark exports jpg ppi worthless.

  But Photoshop is to assign a value of ppi when it opens an image without specified ppi value.

  This value is be 72, but it could be anything, because the pixel dimensions do not change.

• Hello, I'm trying to export jpg high-resolution printing

  Hello, I'm trying to export jpg high-resolution printing, 3000px.

  2 questions:

  Should what settings I do for this export?

  How can I check what size he is after export?

  In Mac Help, Lightroom 6, no cc.

  current settings under:

  image resizing

  resizing to fit - enabled

  3000px long edge

  Resolution 300pixels by thumb

  do not enlarge: checked

  Thanks for the reply

  also if a request for a photo output is simply, ' high resolution jpeg, 3000px ' would be - that give what I need?

  It is an unfortunately typical piece of nonsense about what you need to submit a photo. This is a meaningless statement. You should ask for details. It might be, they don't really know what they want, or they can not properly express what they want, or that they are so poorly informed about digital photography, all they tell you is nonsense.

  How can I check which is the number of px?

  If you choose to export with long edge to 3000 pixels, you should not check. I just accept that Lightroom has given me what I asked. But if you check, your operating system can tell you the size in pixels.

• Why is - this 3 minutes 4K video 24 hours for export?

  I am a complete newbie to creation, so I'm still learning how do, but even though I know that 3 minutes 4K video should not take 24 hours to export.

  Here is some information on the situation:

  Export settings:

  Using the H.264 format with the YouTube 4 K preset.

  

  FX applied:

  Small exposure compensation, contrast, saturation, etc.

  Lumetri color to apply READ

  Denoiser II 200%

  Add an MP3 soundtrack

  Using an adjustment layer for the color adjustment and an another adjustment layer to create an effect of culture

  Added a few titles of text

  Slow motion of a clip to 20% of the speed

  Source of images:

  Slog2 XAVCS 60Mbps 4K video in .mp4 format

  Image size: 3840 x 2160

  Bitrate: kbps 56722

  Rate: 24 p

  Specifications of the PC:

  i5 - 4790K

  GPU Radeon HD 7950

  8 GB RAM DDR3

  Windows 10

  Power supply 600W

  Let me know if you need more information about my project and I would appreciate any guidance at all! I'm so completely new to this, so I will try to learn as much as I can.

  Hello noahthomas,

  But even though I know that 3 minutes video 4 K should not take 24 hours for export.

  He could.

  First of all, I just created a FAQ for those who have the same problem as you. Please read and see what you think: FAQ: how to speed up making, export or encoding?

  My assessment for why it might take a long time to export your short project:

  1. Material considerations
     1. CPU: encoding is a CPU-intensive process.
        1. Consider that your processor can be not powerful enough for the encoding of the 4K images at the rate you would expect.
        2. Think also that you don't have several processors, like many computers.
     2. GPU: the GPU can be used to speed up some processes for export.
        1. Consider that your GPU is unable to be activated.
           1. Since you have a GPU that can probably be activated for GPU acceleration, ensure that it is enabled in the settings of the project.
           2. If you use SOUL, make sure this option is enabled, as well.
     3. Hard drive: fast hard disks can help exporters faster.
        1. You use a separate hard drive?
        2. If so, it is internal or external?
        3. How this player is connected?
           1. The hard drive is connected via wired broadband or a slower?
  2. Media optimized
     1. Your support is optimized for coding?
  1. No current scaling: good. However, you encode to an enormous size. Take into consideration the size of the actual image that you encode.
  2. You encode the original camera film, so that the smart rendering process cannot be used to speed up the encoding process unless it was converted.
  3. You add Lumetri effects, which can represent time in the encoding process.
     1. Technique to avoid this problem: transcode original camera to intermediate codec while at the same time adding the Lumetri same effect via Media Encoder before editing it.
  4. You use the effects of the third party: some third-party effects are known to considerably increase export time. Any image as Neat or Denoiser II denoiser are particularly notorious for jacking up your time for export. It's probably the cause of your long time export.
     1. A good way around this time intensive process is to transcode the images to an intermediate codec with the denoiser plug-in for Adobe Media Encoder.
     2. In a process of one night or more, before you start same edition. The treatment of effects, you know that you will use to forward the unloading can save loads of time ultimately encoding.
• You use rendered intelligent?
  1. You do not use made smart, therefore, you cannot export the absolute quickest way that Premiere Pro is capable.
  2. You can use smart making encoding tasks in the future, however, a large part of the benefits of smart rendering cannot be used unless you allow for it in the preparatory stages of the project planning. Again, see the FAQ for more information on the smart rendering and how it can save you time while being a more reliable way to export at the same time.

Hope this helps you for your encoding job and future encodes. Please return to the questions.

Thank you

Kevin

• Images high resolution that I matter IIN indesign appear in a definition very mlauvaise to the screen and once exported to pdf, they are still quite far from the original. Perhaps to remedy these problems.

  Images high resolution that I import in indesign appear in a very bad definition on-screen and when exported to pdf, they are still quite far from the original. Perhaps to address these problems?

  The bad export quality could be linked to the pre-selection of PFD you have chosen. Some of the presets are designed to re - sample images to make a smaller final PDF

• What is the best way to archive images high resolution for cloud storage?

  I have a library of 100 gigabytes. Is it possible to retain the vignettes catalog and image on my computer, but archive images high resolution for cloud storage somewhere in order to save space on my hard drive? If so, is it possible that Lightroom can automatically recover if they are needed, IE. If I want to print or export the image?

  Lightroom does not really work with images cloud storage.

  If you want to archive the images in the cloud, you will need to do this manually and get the images manually. (Which means there are plenty of chances to make a mistake, and so I do not recommend this unless you are sure to 100%, you know what you're doing in both the fine mist of things and with Lightroom)

  Or you could buy an external HD, which are relatively expensive and move the photos here.

• "PP can now take full advantage of the PC with several GPU cards for export substantially accelerated time"

  On the features page Adobe clearly shows:

  Export multiple GPU support

  Premiere Pro can now take full advantage of computers with multiple GPU cards for export substantially accelerated time. Rendering and compression just got a whole lot faster.
  
  

  Can someone PLEASE be very specific as to how it works with the new 2015 CC?  I just bought my 2nd GTX 970 and SLI it had.  Now I read a lot of conflicting testimony online and can't seem to get a straight answer.  Please don't refer either items that are either outdated or forums.  Adobe CC 2015 was just released there not too long ago, which is what this new feature.
  

  Is having two 970's beneficial for first use SLI and AE?  Can I use the SLI bridge or not?   Can I turn in NVIDIA SLI Control Panel?  Or did I frankly just lose $330?

  Any educated idea would be GREATLY appreciated to help relieve this anxiety.  Thank you...

  
  
  
  

  Eric Bowen of computers ADK is frequently here on this forum, and with Bill Gehrke, can give you the best technique advises compared to your current and future workflow exact. Change style and which codecs you use are very important.

  Given that you JUST improved don't panic... There are a few simple adjustments, you can do to get the most out of your current equipment.

  1. make sure your Samsung 850 pro has ONLY your operating system, programs and Windows swap file on it... nothing more. Turn off "Indexing" for all your disks in the system. You will need a separate and quick 'reader' for ALL your other files (images, previews, projects, export, media cache and cache files). The IDEAL reader for this is the new SSD Samsung SM951 PCI, which runs more than 1.5 GB/s.  The performance is going to be super fast. the use of this drive, but its capacity is LIMITED. You would then be advised to add drive hard level of large companies 'offload' all files to the guard. These recent hard drives crashed at 200 MB/s with a 128 MB cache on them and go up to at least 6 TB of size... they are not expensive.

  2. your CPU is designed to be overclocked... TAKE ADVANTAGE of that and try to get the highest stable frequency, you can with it, ensuring that you use a good cooling solution--probably water. Performance will get a significant boost of this MOST important factor.  Of course, your CPU has "only' '8 processors" with hyperthreading from the end superior Haswell E CPUs that can give you sixteen YEARS... but, SPEED of CPU CLOCK is KING and will affect your performance because MOST of the video are processed ONLY with the CPU. NVidia GPU support will BE GREATLY whenever SPECIFIC on your timeline functions are those which can be CUDA accelerated... i. e "scaling", "ultra key", "dissolves" and a host of effects and other features. When it is the GPU CAN speed up the heavy calendar saturated with CUDA effects by a factor of TEN TIMES when "made this preview," or, "exporting media" your CPU has a stock speed of 3.6 Ghz and will be turbo up to 3.8 on all 4 cores. MANY users are overclocking your processor to a stable 4.7 Ghz... Some are more than 5 GHz! You can see that an increase of a full Ghz would give you about 20-25% performance... it's a LOT!

  It has been said here on this forum that once the processor is more than 4 GHz, it's OK even to 4K.

  However, I've ALSO seen here, (Eric, I think), that certain types of 4K really needs to have a GPU that has a minimum of 4 GB of memory DDR5 video memory due to "frame problem", or "frame buffer".    Thus, a return of the 970 s and KEEP one, (if it has 4 GB of video memory or more). Use the return to SM 951 drive.

  3. make sure all your settings are properly defined. In Windows, power settings make sure that all settings are for OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE so that Windows reduce NOT anything automatically... I learned this lesson on my laptop... the DEFAULT settings have been throttling the CPU and the GPU all the time until I fixed it!

  Then, first, make sure that you have the correct settings to allocate the amount of memory for first use... Eric has said here, it should be at least 3 GB by thread (I think... it can called ' base'...) I forgot). In YOUR case it means assign 24 GB of system memory for first, (8 'threads' x 3 = 24 GB). The rest can be defined for use in 'other programmes' of course, you can experiment and increase the amount of 3.5 or another higher.

  4. do not panic... Bill and I have the same laptops Asus who two years now with the 765 m 2 GB NVidia GPU in them and the HQ of 4700 i7 CPU. We shitcanned included and 5400 RPM hard drive and we both installed two quality SATA III SSD in each of the two hard drive bays. We also each increased the memory of the laptop to 24 GB. Bill has already done a few projects 4K basic on his laptop and I have experimented with 4K on mine. On my laptop, basic editing is not a problem with 4K, but addition of video tracks and effects slowing it... However, the chronology which fixes not making it. YOUR machine correctly overclocked, with more memory than we and a SM 951 and a GPU 970 should do very WELL at the moment... I think.   Unless you want to spend 4 to 5 $000 on a new machine of Haswell E X 99!

  p.s. If you are working with 4K and 1080 p quality, you need a couple of good monitors. I recently bought TWO 27 inch Acer IPS monitors that are WQHD, or, 2560 x 1440 p in the resolution. They were rated very high in addition to a review and are IPS... the density of pixels is IDEAL... to 27 inches, 1440 p video looks LIKE 4 K!   The quality of the color and the image is amazing. My laptop powers BOTH monitors at full resolution! We use HDMI 1.4 and the other the 'mini displayport' 1.1 connection... (which is also called Thunderbolt version 1). This monitor is only $200 on the egg, (including a $50 discount). Others in this class are 6 to 7 cents.

• CS6 version fonts on Win8 are extremlly small high resolution

  on my computer laptop im working at high resolution: 3840 X 2160

  and I put all the settings of fonts to be as large as possible.

  all photoshopmenus are very very small and its not reasonable to work like this.

  It is important to say that any other resolution I've tried can not show 'windows' and other applications in the common sense (too big).

  I'd appreciate if some can please let me know if there is anything I can do to solve it? its very important for me to work on Photoshop and keep this resolution.

  Here is the hack to change the registry - for Win only:

  Adobe App scaling on the screens to high-resolution (FIX) | Dan Antonielli