Access WAN LRT214

Similar Questions

• Drops connection WAN LRT214

  Hello

  I just put up my new LRT214 as a replacement for my D-Link standard DWR-921.

  My ISP have active DHCP and my old router was just set up to automatically get and it just worked.

  Now I have implemented mt LRT214 in the same way. Router mode: Bridge, WAN: get an ip via DHCP. Nothing else configured.

  Now, after a minute or so he obtain an IP and DNS, default GW. Everything is great and I can't Web browser.

  Now, after a minute or two then the connection to the Wan has been abandoned. Wait a minute and his place again. Another minute and it falls again. And so on and so forth.

  Check the system log:

  Time Event-Type Message
  Jul 9 20:01:59 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:02:02 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:06:57 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 62.212.73.138:60000->5.103.237.176:5632 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:20 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:07:39 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:39 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:07:46 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:07:52 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:08:36 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:08:56 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:09:07 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 118.249.91.161:18339->5.103.237.176:1433 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:09:28 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 199.168.141.47:18339->5.103.237.176:1433 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:03 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:10:22 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:22 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:10:51 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 222.186.52.2:6000->5.103.237.176:5904 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:11:37 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 62.75.145.240:67->5.103.237.176:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:00 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:27 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation UDP 5.103.237.1:67->255.255.255.255:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:27 2015 Log WAN connection is down
  Jul 9 20:12:33 2015 Log WAN connection is up : 5.103.237.176/255.255.255.0 gw 5.103.237.1 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:12:51 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 77.105.106.32:67->5.103.237.176:68 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:13:20 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 222.186.51.72:50989->5.103.237.176:22 on eth1
  Jul 9 20:15:10 2015 Connection Refused - Policy violation TCP 80.85.84.75:43601->5.103.237.176:5800 on eth1
  

  If I put my old D-link between WAN and LRT214 (in router mode), then everything works perfectly, but not an ideal of facilities at all.

  Have I misconfigured / you forgot something?

  Concerning

  Casper

  Which firmware version are you running?

  Try disabling the "Block WAN request" under the firewall settings.

• Cisco RV042G problems?

  Hello

  Im having a problem with a router cisco RV042G and im hoping that someone could give some advice.

  I have two Cisco 1720 routers and router RV042G. I use the RV042G as a "border" router, which gives access WAN/internet outside of two 1720 routers.

  The two 1720 routers are connected to each other (ports eth0 on both) with crossover. Also, each 1720 router is also connected to one of the 4 ports on the RV042G router switch. The fa0 on each 1720 router port is connected to its own switch with customer (s)

  Logically, it is what is the page layout...

  

  I have configured all interfaces whose IP correct using VLSM. The two LANs are on their own subnet, and each router to router connection is on its own subnet.

  I have configured RIP version 2 on the two routers in 1720 and also on RIP on the RV042G and configure it to send and receive updates V2. RIP version 2 is working great between all three routers.

  View the routing on the two routers in 1720 table is perfect. They RIP routes to each subnet and also received a route RIP of the border for the WAN to the outside router.

  Both routers are also capable of ANYTHING, ping clients on both sides, each router interface, the border and outside addresses WAN router.

  My problem is with the customers. Both Clients can ping EVERYTHING except the border router (RV042G). They can ping each other, they can ping all the interfaces on the routers of 1720, but they cannot ping the RV042G or whatever it is in addition to the WAN (where customers will receive their internet from)

  Im a little confused. If it were another manageable router as the 1720 I could get this race. Throw the NAT on the router to border and move on with life. But because it is a router in the web interface, I can't seem to understand why clients cannot reach the border router when two routers have RIP routes and can ping it very well.

  The firewall on the RV042G is completely right now, as well as client firewalls.

  Here is the config of the two 1720 routers:

   outhfieldRouter#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 799 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname SouthfieldRouter ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ! no aaa new-model ! resource policy ! mmi polling-interval 60 no mmi auto-configure no mmi pvc mmi snmp-timeout 180 ip subnet-zero ip cef ! ! no ip dhcp use vrf connected ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.7.138 255.255.255.252 full-duplex ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 172.16.7.131 255.255.255.248 full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 172.16.7.65 255.255.255.192 speed 100 ! router rip version 2 passive-interface FastEthernet0 network 172.16.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ! no ip http server ! ! control-plane ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end SouthfieldRouter#

   TroyRouter#copy run start Destination filename [startup-config]? Building configuration... [OK] TroyRouter#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 792 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname TroyRouter ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ! no aaa new-model ! resource policy ! mmi polling-interval 60 no mmi auto-configure no mmi pvc mmi snmp-timeout 180 ip subnet-zero ip cef ! ! no ip dhcp use vrf connected ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.7.137 255.255.255.252 full-duplex ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 172.16.7.130 255.255.255.248 full-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 172.16.7.1 255.255.255.192 speed 100 ! router rip version 2 passive-interface FastEthernet0 network 172.16.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ! no ip http server ! ! control-plane ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end TroyRouter#

  I had a model of plotter package physical layout that worked very well. Packet trace is not similar to the RV042G router, so I used three of the same routers.

  Anyone have any ideas?

  Thanks in advance

  > Both Clients can ping EVERYTHING except the border router (RV042G).

  based on this, I hope that RV042G did not know where to send the icmp response - i.e. RV042 is missing information on both client subnets. ICMP echo is received successfully by RV042G, but the response is sent to the wrong direction (default route to the internet?).

  > RIP v2 is working great between all three routers.

  How did you get this? can you show us routing table from at least RV042G router? for me, for some reason any RIP routing updates are not accepted/Treaty by RV042 router.

  1720 routers configuration seems perfect, part of RIP configuration as well and routing updates to be sent out of all interfaces except Fa0 interfaces.

• Internet via VPN

  Hello

  I have a server EZVPN configuration and it works well. Client can connect to the LAN on the EZVPN server side. I have not split tunneling so local LAN access to the customer is lost.

  Currently, when the VPN client is connected, they are not able to get internet through their LAN or VPN. I would like it so they could get internet access (WAN) through the VPN tunnel. Is this possible?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes, not really familiar with the router side of this. I think that its probably works not because of NAT rules or the router does not correctly forward traffic

  Here are some links that I could find on the subject. I don't know if they are of any help

  Router and VPN Client for Internet audience on a stick Configuration example

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_configuration_example09186a008073b06b.shtml

  Cisco VPN Client Configuration - installation for router IOS

  http://www.firewall.CX/Cisco-technical-Knowledgebase/Cisco-routers/809-Cisco-router-VPN-client.html

  -Jouni

• VPN with NAT Interface

  Hello

  I am trying to set up a VPN between a VLAN I have defined and another office. I have been using nat on the interface for internet access with a NAT pool.

  I created the VPN with crypto card and the VPN is successfully registered.

  The problem I encounter is that with NAT is enabled, internet access is working but I can ping through the VPN.

  If I disable NAT, VPN works perfectly, but then him VLAN cannot access the internet.

  What should I do differently?

  Here is the config:

  Feature: 2911 with security package

  Local network: 10.10.104.0/24

  Remote network: 192.168.1.0/24

  Public beach: 65.49.46.68/28

  crypto ISAKMP policy 104

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key REDACTED address 75.76.102.50

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac strongsha

  OFFICE 104 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peer 75.76.102.50

  Set transform-set strongsha

  match address 104

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  IP 65.49.46.68 255.255.255.240

  penetration of the IP stream

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  full duplex

  Speed 100

  standby mode 0 ip 65.49.46.70

  0 6 2 sleep timers

  standby 0 preempt

  card crypto OFFICE WAN redundancy

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2.104

  encapsulation dot1Q 104

  IP 10.10.104.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat pool wan_access 65.49.46.70 65.49.46.70 prefix length 28

  overload of IP nat inside source list 99 pool wan_access

  access-list 99 permit 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104. allow ip 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104. allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104 allow icmp 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104 allow icmp 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  ISAKMP crypto #sh her

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  DST CBC conn-State id

  65.49.46.70 75.76.102.50 QM_IDLE 1299 ACTIVE

  Hello!

  Please, make these changes:

  extended Internet-NAT IP access list

  deny ip 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 10.10.104.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  IP nat inside source list Internet-NAT pool access-wan overload

  * Please do not remove the old NAT instance until you add that above.

  Please hold me.

  Thank you!

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• i6400: how Intel WirelessPRO without DHCP?

  Hello

  Recently, I have switsched my home lan DHCP Server Manual. But the built in Client wireless in my inspiron 6400 (Intel-WirelesspPRO abg) seems to have problems with a manual ip address. I have properly configuered in windows settings manual ip address.

  After about 1 hour of connection to the issue of router becoms an i can no longer access wan (I always strangely access lan-devices)

  As soon as I turn the router DHCP and windows fo the customer settings wireless on 'automatic' my connection is back...

  .. .but I want to be able to run a lan configured manually without DHCP!

  ... any ideas?

  Thank you...

  ter111

  
  

• Use WAN connected airport Time Capsule as a wireless access point

  I had to replace a failed 4 Gen Time Capsule. I tried to install a new Gen 5 airport TimeCapsule via WAN and set up the airport to act as a wireless access point. It is installed in an area of my house with wireless coverage. In the network of AirPort Utility Mode section, I chose "extend a wireless network. The TC is restarted, I get an error message cannot find the intended wireless network.

  What I lack?

  "Extend a wireless network" is a parameter that is only used if the time Capsule need to connect to another router from Apple with the help of a Wi-Fi connection.

  You use Ethernet to connect, you must use the parameter to "create a wireless network. Use the same wireless network name and the same password as your "primary" router

• Why can't I access my server sharepoint since the WAN?

  When you try to access my sharepoint since the WAN Portal get the login prompt for my domain credentials that I get them & the answer I get is "the current Web page is trying to open a site on your intranet. You want to allow this? Yes takes me to the my part of sites. Don't give me internet explore cannot display the Web page. & in the URL, I see the name of the server as I see on my local network. I did the following: DNS has a CNAME record for the sharepoint server and the good record for the good IP. I made sure that the ISP has NAT for the server sharepoint LAN ip:100 to the external IP address. Also ensured that the public dns ip corresponds to the external ip address. Don't know what I'm missing.

  Ask the question in the SHAREPOINT FORUMS:
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/SharePoint/

• E4200: no WAN access, can't Flash firmware

  Hey all,.

  I got my E4200v1 by yesterday and the installation was easy enough... Apart from two problems:

  1. He's not through an internet connection. I use a de Vigor120 ADSL2 modem that connects to the internet just fine. When I plug in the router and a wired / wireless, I can't access the web.

  Then, I put the modem to use the router as my DMZ. The E4200 correctly displays my WAN IP in State and gateway/DNS to my ISP servers. Still no internet access.

  I am sure this should work (or the router is broken)... Please advise! 

  02:02 hours of head, tremors, I tried to update the firmware of the router. 1.0.04)is will fail as soon as it downloads. The DD - WRT build from the wiki page fails as soon as it downloads. I always do a 30/30/30 reset before each.

  Any ideas? I'm at the limit of my understanding and experience. The next thing this router is returned... Something I've never had to do before! (Also, I bought in Australia if it makes a difference).

  Thanks for any input

  mafro

  Edit: I'm working on the assumption that 'v1.0.02' on the admin of my router shows my router really * is * a E4200v1.

  Just in case anyone else has this problem - I have just flashed with build 18777 BrainSlayer's DD - WRT wiki (Google it).

  Everything works now. It's a real shame for a large part of the cost of this router is so obviously lost in the software.

  I would recommend to anyone who knows what they are actually doing to purchase Draytek. Loads of features, no frills, it works.

  Good night

• RV220W - rules of access/redirection of port with multiple WAN IP addresses

  I just installed a Cisco RV220W - that works very well for outbound traffic, however for incoming it seems unable to work with multiple WAN IP addresses.

  We have a block of 6 WAN IPs assigned to us by our ISP, and I want to use each of them to expose certain ports on our servers to the outside world.

  I tried to do with rules (by using HTTP, for example) with the following parameters:

  Connection type: Inbound (WAN (Internet) > LAN (local area network))

  Action: Always leave

  Service: HTTP

  Source IP: Unique address

  Start:

  Send to the Server Local (DNAT IP):

  Use other WAN (Internet) IP address: disabled

  Status: Activated

  However, the port of the inaccessible Server/rest.

  I tried:

  • Restart the server with power power off again
  • implement the same port forwarding settings
  • triple-checking all the IP addresses used

  The only way that I have working is by changing the access rule so that it applies to any specific source rather than to another address... but this isn't a solution for us because we need to use specific IP addresses to the internal servers/ports specific.

  The interface of the router admin certainly suggests that this should be possible, but using it seems to break all incoming access!

  Any suggestion is welcome.

  You must use "ANY" as the source IP address, you publish your internal server to the internet and the internet means that the request comes from any source IP address (you don't know what it is, so that's all.

  Basically, you want any source IP to hit one of your WAN IP on port 80, and then your firewall will redirect the request to the internal private IP address of the server on the same port 80. And when the answer comes back internal server, the firewall will already have this translate entry in and reverse NAT won't happen (you must configure it, the default firewall function).

  I hope that I have answered your question.

  Please mark as correct, if you like the answer.

  Thank you

• RV016 access to the modem in wan1 administration page, wan 2... from LAN

  Hello

  We have installed router rv016, balancing 5 adsl conections.

  We can access the router rv016 with IP 192.168.1.1 LAN.

  We can access the administration modem1 page in wan1 which has IP 10.0.0.1

  But we cannot access other pages of Directors of modems as fitted wan2 IP 10.0.0.2, or modem wan3 with IP 10.0.0.3, modem wan4 or wan5...

  In the diagnosis of rv016 page, we can make a successful ping 10.0.0.1, but not to another wan...

  All modems have active DHCP ok with access authorization.

  Can you help us?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Change modems to get LAN IP addresses in different subnets:

  10.0.0.1

  10.0.1.1

  10.0.2.1

  10.0.3.1

  10.0.4.1

  Then, everything should work perfectly.

  Please mark this thread as answer or reply if you have any additional questions.

  -Marty

• RV042G - access modem connected to a WAN port

  Hello

  I've set up my RV042G with that one line WAN currently using a modem Alice IAD to connect to my ISP. This unit has an own web server for configuration currently configured IP 192.168.0.1. The dual WAN router got the address of WAN IP 192.168.0.4 (the fixed address) and a LAN IP 192.168.0.5. Now, I need to access the modem from time to time for maintenance but can not reach address 192.168.0.1. The RV042G can be configured to allow communication between the modem and the LAN devices? I tried to put a static route, but that did not help. I'm certainly not a network expert.

  Thank you

  Mike

  Hi Mike, if your modem is able to log on locally, then the LAN RV042G subnet should be different from that of the modem LAN subnet. Given that your modem is 192.168.0.x your RV042G can be 192.168.1.x for LAN. So the RV042G WAN is 192.168.0.x.

  This should be your goal.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• PCoIP WAN access

  Hi all

  I have a problem regarding the PCoIP and access from WAN. No problem to connect to connect to the server, but when trying to open the office, I'll be connected but the black ramins display. RDP works well. I created firewall rules for this office-VM on port UDP and TCP 50002 computer, but still does not.

  Does anyone have any idea?

  Best regards

  Sebastian

  HaM1 wrote:

  Is it planned to tunnel packets PCoIP? Won or ' little ever be possible because of Protocol restrictions?

  Obviously I can't discuss the features in future versions, but there is no restriction that prevents us from application support of tunnel to PCoIP. VMware commit to PCoIP as primary in view, the priority Protocol was given in the 4.0.0 release Protocol main rather than extras to bring it up to parity with view & RDP functionality, but something missing in this release is sought.

• How to install a pppoe network miniport driver extended wan without internet access?

  I have a yellow excalmation point on the network driver and currently do not have internet access. I tried to re - install the player, but he says it was blocked as a result does not not with windows. If I could download the driver to a flash drive and reinstall on my father'd computer, hopefully that will solve my problem.

  Hello

  What is the brand and model of the computer?

  Yes, you can download the appropriate drivers for the device to another computer and transfer it to the computer of the problem. You can install the drivers and let us know the results.

• Local Access Mode - manual removal via WAN connection

  I would like to set up local access to some desktop computers, but want to use the option of manual control (pg 254 of the admin View 4.6 guide) I released the base image which was published on the forwarding server, but when a user try to complete the payment process they get the error "a connection to the forwarding server could not be established. Please check your network settings. They are able to see their jobs right and that it points to the base image they received via other channels of distribution (and not directly from the servers of the view)

  My security server firewall is configured to allow the ports on the JMS, JMSIR, AJP13 connection server, http, https and PCoIP but how to configure the forwarding server to adapt to configuration or are there alternatives to opening ports on the server to transfer inside the LAN of business if I want to just use it for access in local mode

  Hi Mobcdi,

  Option 1 (tunnel) description says "network traffic is routed via the view connection server or a server security if one is configured."

  Sequence - 1 is seems more correct, but with slight modifications.

  Form SS must be a SSL connection to TS, because all local traffic is routed directly between the SS and TS

  Firewall rules of back-end on Page 61 of the www. VMware.com/pdf/view-46-architecture- planning.pdf said

  "If you configure the connection to the server display to use SSL for operations in local mode and office supply, security servers using port 443 for downloads and the replication between the local mode desktops and server transfer."

  -noble