Address translation w/Cisco Pix
How can I make translation of addresses of destination on a Pix in the more secure to least secure orientation?
Use the static command as follows:
public static 10.1.1.1 (exterior, Interior) 200.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
Note interfaces are exchanged around a normal static command.
That said, it is that if the PIX sees a package inside interface destined to 10.1.1.1, send him outside outside inside and indicate the destination 200.1.1.1
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
Erase the old Cisco PIX beyond recovery
I have an old Cisco PIX that has been configured with the VPN site - to many who have been migrated to a new ASA last year. The same IP addresses, PSK, etc are still active on the SAA new config info stored in the PIX is still valid. I want to erase the memory on the PIX beyond all recovery-ability, to the same specifications of DoD to erase hard drives. I don't like leaving the ASA in a usable state after - it goes to the recycling center. I'd like to open the case to remove internal parts.
I am aware of the process to restore the default settings, but this process is secure? If a hacker were to get the PIX may recover data deleted from memory? Cisco certifies all process of erasing/destroying data securely?
Thank you in advance.
Cisco had a download that would actually crush flash with zeros that you could use. It is no longer available because this product is long after the end of life. Even if you had a copy, it is not spec compliant DoD for sanitation.
Unfortunately, your option at this stage would be to open the casing and physically destroy the internal memory card.
-
Connectivity random Cisco Pix 501
Hello. I'm having some trouble with my CISCO PIX 501 Setup.
A few months I started having random disconnects on my network (from inside to outside). The machines can ping the DC or the Pix, but impossible to surf the internet. The only way to make them go outside is a reboot of Pix.
My configuration is:
-----------
See the ACE - pix config (config) #.
: Saved
: Written by enable_15 at 09:23:07.033 UTC Tuesday, June 3, 2014
6.3 (3) version PIX
interface ethernet0 car
interface ethernet1 100full
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
activate 8Ry34retyt7RR564 encrypted password
2fvbbfgdI.2KUOU encrypted passwd
hostname as pix
domain as.local
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol esp-ike
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol pptp 1723
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
access-list acl_out permit icmp any one
ip access list acl_out permit a whole
access-list acl_out permit tcp any one
Allow Access-list outside_access_in esp a whole
outside_access_in list access permit udp any eq isakmp everything
outside_access_in list of access permit udp any eq 1701 all
outside_access_in list of access permit udp any eq 4500 all
outside_access_in ip access list allow a whole
pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
outside 10.10.10.2 IP address 255.255.255.0
IP address inside 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 10.10.10.8 - 10.10.10.254 (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access to the interface inside group acl_out
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 0
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.255 inside
http 192.168.10.101 255.255.255.255 inside
http 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.255 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
ISAKMP nat-traversal 20
Telnet timeout 5
SSH 192.168.10.101 255.255.255.255 inside
SSH timeout 60
Console timeout 0
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
dhcpd outside auto_config
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:7f9bda5e534eaeb1328ab08a3c4d28a
------------Do you have any advice? I don't get what's wrong with my setup.
My DC is 192.168.100.2 and the network mask is 255.255.255.0
The network configuration is configured to set the IP of the gateway to 192.168.100.1 (i.e. the PIX 501).
I have about 50 + peers on the internal network.
Any help is apprecciate.
Hello
You have a license for 50 users +?
After the release of - Show version
RES
Paul
-
Hi, I have a problem affecting this pix 2 for my client. I did the exact configuration of the cisco document, but it still does not work. I cannot ping another eath and cannot access anything whatsoever. Thank you
try to apply this command 'isakmp identity address' on the two pix.
then kick off another ping t
on the pix, do "sh cry isa his" to check whether or not the ipsec tunnel is released. also "sh cry ips its" to check the current number of packets being encrypted/decrypted.
-
RV-320 Port Address Translation does not
Hi all
I have a really weird question that drives me crazy. I have a somewhat complex configuration that goes something like: access provider Internet by Modem cable ==> internal ==> ASA5505 ==> LAN router. Have a few servers on the internal network, I want to be able to access from the outside.
Everything worked fine until I decided to trade in my old router 1841 for this RV router, because it has faster WAN interfaces and uses less energy. Initial Setup was extremely easy. Port Address Translation is enabled by default, my internal clients can get out of the 'net without problem. But no matter what I try, I can't access internal servers.
I contacted the support of Cisco. They spent about 2 hours on my machine and ultimately told me that the problem is with my ASA (it is no longer under warranty). But still I can disconnect the RV and reconnect the 1841 (or a former 1605, I still have) and all begin to operate.
To prove or disprove the ASA being the culprit, I decided to test trying to open an SSH session to the SAA itself. Should not be double-nat, as the ASA didn't need to pass this traffic to another internal peripheral.
Once I try a connection (and it fails), I check the log "inbound" on the RV he gets 3 hits, indicating 'successful connection '.
Details of the journal are strange. It shows the port as Eth1 and port out Eth0. Seems to me this should be reversed, as I use as my ISP port WAN1 and WAN2 for my network internal.
The IP Source address matches the external IP I use; lists correctly inside the ASA
Most confusing are the MAC addresses. The MAC Source does not belong to everything that I have, I would say. I checked all the interfaces on the RV, the ASA and my switches. The MAC (00:12:d9:54:a7:63) shows that belonging to Cisco. My cable modem is a Cisco device. But it shows a completely different Mac. It is a mystery. Then address MAC of Destination solved the WAN1 on the RV is interface * that * correct?
Please tell me where I can go from here. I can't believe that this device cannot successfully perform a translation of port address / redirect.
Thank you!
Brian
Brian,
Sorry about the way it had to go on the creation of personalized services, I didn't it would fail to ports known. I'll see if I can find someone here who can give advice on the installation of the ASA, although this would be a good idea to post your questions and config in these forums.
-Marty
-
I need help setting up a Cisco PIX 506th Version 6.3 (5)
I use the PDM to configure the device, because I don't know enough of CLI. I want to just the simplest of configurations.
Here is what is happening, I set up then I hang the Interface 1 to my laptop and use DHCP to get an ip address, but I can't get out to the internet like that. Thanks PDM tools, I can ping outside the IPS very well.
6.3 (5) PIX version
interface ethernet0 car
Auto interface ethernet1
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
activate the encrypted password of DkreNA9TaOYv27T8
c4EBnG8v5uKhu.PA encrypted passwd
hostname EWMS-PIX-630
domain ciscopix.com
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
object-group service udp test
port-object eq isakmp
inside_access_in ip access list allow a whole
access-list inside_access_in allow a tcp
access-list inside_access_in allow icmp a whole
Allow Access-list inside_access_in esp a whole
inside_access_in tcp allowed access list all eq www everything
inside_outbound_nat0_acl list of permitted access interface ip inside 10.10.10.96 255.255.255.240
inside_outbound_nat0_acl ip access list allow any 10.10.10.192 255.255.255.224
pager lines 24
timestamp of the record
recording of debug trap
host of logging inside the 10.10.10.13
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP outdoor 75.146.94.109 255.255.255.248
IP address inside 10.10.10.250 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
location of PDM 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.255 inside
location of PDM 10.10.10.13 255.255.255.255 inside
location of PDM 10.10.10.253 255.255.255.255 inside
location of PDM 75.146.94.105 255.255.255.255 inside
location of PDM 75.146.94.106 255.255.255.255 inside
location of PDM 10.10.10.96 255.255.255.240 outside
location of PDM 10.10.10.192 255.255.255.224 outside
PDM logging 100 information
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.146.94.110 1
Timeout xlate 0:05:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Sip timeout - disconnect 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-RADIUS (inside) host 10.10.10.1 server timeout 10
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
ISAKMP allows outside
ISAKMP peer ip 206.196.18.227 No.-xauth No.-config-mode
ISAKMP nat-traversal 20
ISAKMP policy 20 authentication rsa - sig
encryption of ISAKMP policy 20
ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash
20 1 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 40
encryption of ISAKMP policy 40
ISAKMP policy 40 md5 hash
40 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP duration strategy of life 40 86400
ISAKMP policy 60 authentication rsa - sig
encryption of ISAKMP policy 60
ISAKMP policy 60 md5 hash
60 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP strategy life 60 86400
Telnet 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
dhcpd address 10.10.10.2 - 10.10.10.5 inside
dhcpd dns 68.87.72.130
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
dhcpd allow inside
btork encrypted Ww3clvi.ynWeGweE privilege 15 password username
vpnclient Server 10.10.10.1
vpnclient-mode client mode
vpnclient GroupA vpngroup password *.
vpnclient username btork password *.
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:5ef06e69c17b6128e1778e988d1b9f5d
: end
[OK]any HEP would be appreciated.
Brian
Brian
NAT is your problem, IE.
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0presumanly first NAT is fot your good VPN that acl looks a little funny, what exactly are you doing with that?
The second NAT is the real problem but for outgoing internet access - the NAT statement, you said not NAT one of your addresses 10.10.10.x which is a problem as 10.x.x.x address is not routable on the Internet.
You must change this setting IE. -
(1) remove the second NAT statement IE. "no nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.
(2) add a new statement of NAT - ' nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.
(3) add a corresponding statement global - global (outside) 1 interface.
This will be PAT all your 10.10.10.x to external IP addresses.
Apologies, but these are some CLI commands that I don't use PDM.
Jon
-
Cisco PIX VPN pass through (sorry, tricky!)
Hello
I'm having some problems with allowing IPSEC through a Cisco PIX 501. The configuration is the following:
Host (mail Client) (192.168.1.111)
|
PIX (NAT)
|
INTERNET
|
(Checkpoint) VPN server
The problem is, the PIX guard dropping my outgoing isakmp packets on its * internal * inetrface!
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
710005: request UDP and eliminated from 192.168.1.111/500 to inside:192.168.1.1/isakmp
Does anyone know why it does this? Anyting to my in-house (security level 100) should go directly to my giving and external interface on the net. For some reason, is to treat the isakmp packets differently...
I have included my config as an attachment, can we see what I missed or have any ideas why it loses the isakmp packets?
Thanks for any help.
Nick Chettle
Check users. C and edit it with your favorite editor. Check if you have a private or public IP address!
I tried to find in the really safe base article I've seen a couple of months ago but I can't find any more.
https://SecureKnowledge.checkpoint.com/SK/public/intro.jsp
See also this FAQ:
http://www.phoneboy.com/bin/view.pl/FAQs/SecureClientFAQs
See CheckPoint VPN-1 Guide that is on the installation CD or go to the web site of checkpoints, BUT you need a valid account Center user to read and download the documentation. Start looking at page 119 and 211.
As usual, nothing is free at the checkpoint.
http://www.checkpoint.com/support/technical/documents/docs_r55.html
sincerely
Patrick
-
The 6.3 (3) Cisco PIX 506 will work as an endpoint? How to configure it?
Do you mean IPSEC endpoint. If so, Yes... You can configure the following:
No nat:
NAT (inside) - 0 100 access list
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.180.1 host 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
IP local pool vpnpool 10.1.1.1 - 10.1.1.254
Crypto map configuration:
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10 transform-set RIGHT
map mymap 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap
client configuration address map mymap crypto initiate
client configuration address map mymap crypto answer
client authentication card crypto LOCAL mymap
mymap outside crypto map interface
ISAKMP allows outside
ISAKMP identity address
The policy configuration:
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10
ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption
ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash
10 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400
VPN group configuration:
vpngroup address vpnpool pool abcvpn
vpngroup split tunnel 100 abcvpn
vpngroup idle 1800 abcvpn-time
vpngroup password abcvpn *.
username cisco password cisco
-
Cisco PIX 501 to Cisco 3005 concentrator via remote access
Hello people,
I need your help.
We got a Cisco PIX 501 in one place and this pix is configured for pppoe connection. The pix connects to internet via the pppoe client. an official ip address ping works well.
So what I want to do is to establish a tunnel von between this pix and a cisco 3005 concentrator.
But I failed to establish it.
Here are the pix config. the acl? s are only for the test and will be replaced if it works.
6.3 (4) version PIX
interface ethernet0 10baset
interface ethernet1 100full
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
activate the password xxx
passwd xxx
hostname PIX - to THE
domain araukraine.ua
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol they 389
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
outside ip access list allow a whole
inside_access_in ip access list allow a whole
pager lines 24
opening of session
Monitor logging warnings
logging warnings put in buffered memory
MTU outside 1456
MTU inside 1456
IP address outside pppoe setroute
IP address inside 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
PDM location 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.224 inside
forest warnings of PDM 500
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
outside access-group in external interface
inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
Timeout xlate 0:05:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
Enable http server
255.255.x.x 192.168.x.x http inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
255.255.x.x telnet inside 192.168.x.x
Telnet timeout 5
SSH 194.39.97.0 255.255.255.0 outside
SSH timeout 5
management-access inside
Console timeout 0
VPDN group pppoe_group request dialout pppoe
VPDN group pppoe_group localname [email protected] / * /
VPDN group ppp authentication pap pppoe_group
VPDN username [email protected] / * / password *.
encrypted privilege 15
vpnclient Server 212.xx.xx.xx
vpnclient mode network-extension-mode
vpntest vpngroup vpnclient password *.
vpnclient username pixtest password *.
Terminal width 80
the hub, I created a user pixtest, a group vpntest and I? ve created the rules of the network for example to what server, users behind the pix will be able to access.
And that? s all.
I couldn't send you exit pix or hub because I don't have an error or a message that the tunnel will be established.
What can be wrong?
Thanks for the replies
This configuration example shows how to create an IPsec tunnel to a computer that is running the Client VPN Cisco's (4.x and later versions) to a Cisco VPN concentrator 3000 to allow the user to safely access the network inside the VPN concentrator.
-
I want to detect if my PC supports
Level address translation Hyper-V and the second customer (SLATS)
and activated it. Hyber VT - X
How?
my PC is
HP Pavilion Elite m9372.gr Desktop PC 2008-2009
Series number:
PART_NUMBER: FZ110AA-B1A
the processor is Intel core 2 Quad
You are right, that the CPU will not support it little matters not matter what OS you are using.
-
Active FTP problem between Checkpoint and Cisco PIX
Hello
I am facing a strange problem.
Many of our customers have achieved a Checkpoint FW-1/VPN-1 4.1 SP6 (the last before NG). When they try to connect to an FTP server that is located behind a Cisco PIX firewall, they are not able to transfer data: the connection is established, the authentication to follow, but at the stage of the 'LIST' the connection 'freeze' and the user must close the FTP client.
Users are facing this problem ONLY in Active mode: passive mode works very well. Turn passive mode FTP client isn't acceptable workaround for most of my clients.
The problem seems to be related only to the firewall Cisco PIX and active FTP.
Please, what is someone encountered the same problem?
Could someone give me any help?
Thank you in advance.
Paolo
Yes it is a (global) problem, even with the last checkpoint firewalls. What happens with Active FTP, it's that each command (get, list, etc.) causes another log on the client (source port) to the server on port 21. If you run netstat from the customer you can check this for yourself.
What normally happens, with HTTP, FTP, telnet, which have are, it's that the client makes a connection to port 21, 23 etc then returns with a port source such as 1936, 1980, 3000, etc..
Connect problem with statefull firewall is they do not allow multiple sessions control port number on a destination, as well as a source port can be bound to a destination port, in this case, 21 for FTP. I Don t see it changed, an extreme security risk any time soon, since it s, someone else might be hopping session and block this type of traffic, it's what the stateful firewall are all about and FTP servers are problably the machines more pirated on the planet.
You´ve mentioned the workaround solution, unfortunately that s the only way, change your passive customers, I think that Unix/Linux customers have a problem with this, change your FTP server can also help, there are multiple servers that can be configured to disable Active FTP, I wouldn know exactly, I only network & firewall... maybe someone else can move on this...
-
Best practice: Forwarding or Port Address Translation
I have a RV320 of delivery and some of the services I want to expose to the internet.
When you configure the router, I found 2 features allowing me to expose services, and both work as expected.
Transmission: Transmit a range of ports to an internal host (for example, 80-80).
Port Address Translation: Pass a port outside to another port (e.g. 80-> 80) inside
The question is this: is it better to use the transfer, specifying several slices 1 port each (e.g., 80, 443, 25, 22), or is it better to use PAT, specify the same port on both outside and inside?
Both have the same purpose, it would be easier to follow if you just use transfer. Port Address Translation is really used if you want to specify individual ports or multiple ports to a single port (e.g. 123-> 80)
-
More than one unit performs (NAT network address translation
Trying to help someone: tried to implement a "Wired home network private. Connected a laptop VISTA and Win7 desktop Ethernet Netgear struggling
NR 2000 wireless router. Restart both computers with a wireless switch on laptop OUT to connect with a wired connection through a Verizon DSL modem router. Two internet access computers.
Computer laptop (VISTA) is able to see and access files on the desktop (Win7) (part);
Desktop computer (WIN7) is able to SEE, but is NOT able to access the files on the laptop. Test results received two:More than one device performs network address translation (NAT...) Reconfigure your network of
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have seen many requests for help on this topic and no seems to have no idea how to fix it.
Anyone know what to do?If I switch the wireless on the laptop, a wireless connection is established and the network functions are now OK (access, two ways of sharing files)
Well guess what; I found the problem. The above result "devices (PC) is not configured to accept the file and printer sharing (SMB) port connections.
I checked the properties for adapter WIRED on Win7 and VISTA and found files and printers sharing DISABLED on the VISTA laptop. Checked the box, clicked on install (I guess that was not necessary, was probably installed but not selected), and then the re-verification properties, it has now been verified. SO I tried to access the computers on both sides (dsktop > laptop, laptop > dsktop) and everything worked fine.Trouble had apparently NOTHING to do with performing NAT network address translation
-
/ * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}
/ * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabla normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;} Hi I need to estimate the time of installation and configuration of addresses IP of Cisco (Cisco IPS NM at 3800, 2811, 2821 and no. 2851).
In your experience, would you give this information?
Thanks for any help you can give on this subject.
You are welcome. If things are clear please mark it as answered.
-
Remote Desktop from Win7 not passing is not by the cisco pix firewall, but xp can.
our company lan remote office work like this:
Win7 for win7 ok
Win7 for xp ok
XP and win7 ok
XP to xp ok
Which leads me to believe that all the parameters and features of firewall and rdp pc work fine.
our remote users connect via the cisco through our cisco pix vpn client business and Remote Desktop works like this:
inside lan xp ouside xp OK
inside lan xp ouside win7 OK
Here's the problem:
inside to outside win7 win7 ==> does NOT connect to (rdp that is)
inside win7 for xp outdoor ==> does NOT connect to (rdp that is)
External clients CAN of course accept rdp because it works when initiated by the xp machine.
ONLY win7 machines cannot use rdp through the cisco firewall
Yes, the dns resolves properly throughout.
Yes, remote desktop IS active (Yes, some may ask me that...)
Ping is not allowed through the firewall, so it makes no difference.
the result is the same whether the win7 firewall is on or off.
all the necessary pc firewall settings are good, as demonstrated in the first part.
Why can you connect the NO Win7? but the XP machines?
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
I think that there are some weird setting in Win7 that didn't exist in winxp.
Hello
The question is more suited in the TechNet forums. So I would say you mention the link and send the request in this forum for better support.
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itpro
For any information related to Windows, feel free to get back to us. We will be happy to help you.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Laptop HP pavillion ts 11: RAM upgrade
Dear specialists is it possible to increase the ram in my pc I went to a Web site that has scanned and said I could, but I'm not sure where I'd put the memory as there are no screws to undo whatever it is based on the laptop pls help
-
Error code: 646 won't let me update the microsoft downloads
won't let me update the microsoft downloads
-
Photo Story 3 for Windows English project
My son saved his photo story 3 for Windows (English project) on his computer. It is a windows XP. Teacher wants that this format used (Photo Story 3 for windows) and asked his students to save it in a removable format or a zip drive. We erased all
-
How to find capabilities of scanning with C5180 all in one with Windows Vista? CC = en
I can print with C5180. I can't scan. When I go to programs on my Windows Vista computer, I can see is no longer my unit indicated. I tried to reinstall the disc that came with the device. Install doesn't work.
-
Question about verification of step 2
I'm just joining Microsoft, got my user and password. But then I was invited to participate in the verification of the 2 step. When I said yes I was asked again for my user and my password and he could not be the same as what I enter. so, I thought